Good Samaritan - Decatur County

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 18.7 residents a day — about 42% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.35 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.64 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 2.03 to 0.99 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 31 residents with three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from abuse and/or neglect. On 02/09/24, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M forcefully grabbed R1's wrist, took the glass of orange juice out of R1's hand, and slammed the orange juice on the table. Then CNA M aggressively grabbed R1's wheelchair to start moving her, and R1 put her foot down on the floor. CNA M yelled at R1 and aggressively placed R1's feet on the foot pedals. Social Services X attempted to intervene, but CNA M ignored Social Services X and continued to try and wheel R1 out of the dining room. CNA M treated R1 in a manner that did not uphold the resident's sense of self-worth and individuality. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for physical harm, pain, and mental anguish. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 30 residents with three reviewed for falls. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent Resident (R) 1 from falling out of bed and failed to ensure intervention in place to prevent injuries for R1 who had multiple falls from her bed. As a result, R1 fell out of bed and sustained an acute left hip fracture. This deficient practice also placed R1 at risk for further falls and injuries. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 06/22/23, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of three, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R1 required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-07-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 13 residents of which five were reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify the risk for pressure injuries and implement preventive interventions for Resident (R)8 who had pressure areas on her buttocks and had a decline in health. As a result, R8 developed a pressure injury to her left heel, which progressed to an open wound. The facility further failed to ensure weekly monitoring of skin conditions in order to assess wound status including wound bed, healing, and effectiveness of treatments for R7 and failed to review and offer treatment options to R31. This deficient practice placed those residents at risk for delayed healing or worsened wounds. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 18 residents. Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ) as required. Findings included:- The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 4 2024 (July 1 - September 30) indicated the facility did not have licensed nurse coverage 24 hours a day on the following dates:07/07/24 (SU), 07/27/24 (SA), 07/28/24 (SU)08/11/24 (SU)09/29/24 (SU).Review of the facility's daily nursing staff coverage revealed the facility had licensed nurse coverage 24 hours a day on the above dates, and revealed the facility had adequate licensed nurse coverage.On 10/21/25 at 08:37 AM, Administrative Staff A stated the human resource staff was responsible for submitting the PBJ during that period of time, and she no longer worked for the facility.The facility's Reporting Direct Care Staffing Information (PBJ) Policy, revised May 2024, documented that complete and accurate direct care staffing information would be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-11-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 18 residents. The sample included eight residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility, in coordination with the licensed pharmacist, failed to provide a system of medication records that enabled periodic, accurate reconciliation and accounting for all resident medications when the emergency medication kit (E-Kit) was unlocked in the medication room. The facility staff failed to label and date Resident (R) 6's Insulin aspart (rapid acting) insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) pen (a device for giving insulin shots). This placed the residents at risk for being charged for a medication not administered to them from the e-kit. Findings included:- On 09/23/25 at 08:50 AM, during inspection of the facility medication room with Licensed Nurse (LN) G, revealed that the blue E-Kit sat on the counter to the left of the entrance door was unsecured with a note in between the handles which read Stop!! New E-Kit instructions. For all medications taken from the E-kit on the inventory sheet, fill out the bottom…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 18 residents. The facility had one main kitchen and one main dining room. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the director of food and nutrition services had the required qualifications of a certified dietary manager (CDM). Findings included:- On 09/22/25 at 08:37 AM, during the initial tour of the facility kitchen, Dietary BB stated that she was currently taking the classes to become certified but had not taken her test yet. Dietary BB further stated that the registered dietician came to the facility twice a month to review the residents' diets and address any weight loss.On 09/23/25 at 09:18 AM, Administrative Staff A stated that Dietary BB would soon be taking her test to become a certified dietary manager.The facility lacked a policy for Certified Dietary Manager as requested on 09/24/25.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 18 residents. The sample included eight residents, with one reviewed for hospitalization and one reviewed for discharge. Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO - a public official who works to resolve resident issues in nursing facilities) and failed to provide one resident, Resident (R) 20, with written information regarding the facility's bed hold policy when they were transferred to the hospital. The facility failed to complete a recapitulation (a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility) for R22.Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R20 documented diagnoses of fracture of the part of the neck of the femur (broken thigh bone), diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 18 residents. The sample included eight residents, with two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 18 had a functional pair of glasses needed for her impaired vision. Findings included:- R18's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and a history of falling.R18's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented she had adequate vision with glasses or other visual appliances and required corrective lenses. R18 had both short and long-term memory problems. R18 had moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. R18 was dependent on staff for her ADLs. R18 required the use of a wheelchair for mobility that staff propelled. R18's Functional Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 02/10/25 documented she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 18 residents. The sample included eight residents, with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to obtain blood pressure parameters from the physician for one resident, Resident (R) 1, who received medication to treat hypertension (high blood pressure). Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R1 documented diagnoses of hypertension, occlusion and stenosis of the right carotid artery (narrowing and blockage of one of the main blood vessels that run up the right side of the neck), and occlusion and stenosis of the right posterior cerebral artery (narrowing and blockage of the artery of the right side of the brain).The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R1 had intact cognition. R1 was independent with activities of daily living and did not ambulate. The MDS further documented R1 received antidepressant (a class of medication that calms and relaxes people), anticoagulant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 18 residents. The sample included eight residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date Resident (R) 6's Insulin Aspart (rapid acting) insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) pen (a device for giving insulin shots).Findings included:- On 09/22/25 at 03:45 PM, observation revealed in the medication cart, R6's Aspart insulin pen was undated when it was opened.On 09/22/25 at 03:45 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G verified R6's insulin pen had been used and was undated to indicate when it was opened. LN G stated staff should date the insulin pen when they open it. LN G discarded the pen in a sharps container (a puncture-resistant, rigid plastic receptacle designed to safely collect and dispose of sharp medical objects like needles, syringes, and scalpels, preventing injuries and the spread of infection).On 09/24/25 at 12:21 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she expected staff to date an insulin pen when they opened it with the expiration date and opened date.The facility did not provide a policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 14 residents, with five residents reviewed for resident rights, activities, staffing, and activities of daily living (ADL). Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient nurse staffing with the appropriate skill sets and competencies to treat Resident (R) 2, R3, R4, R5, and R7 with respect, dignity, and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing. (Refer to F677) Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R2 had diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), mood disorder (category of mental health problems, feelings of sadness, helplessness, guilt, wanting to die were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 14 residents, with five residents reviewed for resident rights, activities, staffing, and Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 2, R3, R4, R5, R6, and R7 with the resident's right to a dignified existence by ensuring the residents were well groomed, clean, and dressed appropriately for the day. This deficient practice placed R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, and R7 at risk for impaired dignity and psychosocial impairment. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R2 had diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), mood disorder (category of mental health problems, feelings of sadness, helplessness, guilt, wanting to die were more intense and persistent than what may normally be felt from time to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 14 residents, with five residents reviewed for resident rights, activities, staffing, and Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 2, R3, R4, R5, R6, and R7 with appropriate ADL care for each resident to maintain a dignified existence and quality of life to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing. This deficient practice placed R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, and R7 at risk for an undignified existence and a decline in their mental and psychosocial well-being. (Refer to F725) Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R2 had diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), mood disorder (category of mental health problems, feelings of sadness, helplessness, guilt,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$20,207 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $20,207 — penalty dated 2023-09-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $554K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS