Good Samaritan - Waukon

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 51.8 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, document review, and staff interview, the facility's administrative staff failed to ensure the staff secured all locked exit doors, resulting in 1 of 3 reviewed residents (Resident #1) at risk for elopement exiting the facility without the nursing staff's knowledge. Due to the facility staff's failures, Resident #1 eloped from the building through the maintenance office door without the nursing staff's knowledge and was missing for approximately 45 minutes before the nursing staff realized Resident #1 was missing by locating Resident #1 laying outside on the ground. The facility's administrative staff identified a census of 51 residents at the time of the on-site investigation.The Iowa State Survey Agency (SA) notified the facility's administrative staff that the situation presented an Immediate Jeopardy situation on [DATE] at 6:00 PM. The immediacy began on [DATE]. The facility's administrative staff removed the immediacy on [DATE] when they took the following actions:- The nursing staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, dishwasher instructional manual, document review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were competent in procedures to test and document the hot water sanitation of the dishwasher. The facility identified a census of 57 residents.Findings include:A Vendor Service Ticket dated 10/1/25 documented the installation of a new high temperature dishwasher.Observation on 4/27/26 at 1:26 PM revealed a hot water sanitation dishwasher. The dishwasher placard located on the right upper side of the dishwasher documented a required wash temperature of 150 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and a final rinse temperature of 180 degrees (F). Staff D, Lead [NAME] obtained the quat bucket test strips and dipped the test strip in the water, then reported she didn't think that was right. Staff E, [NAME] voiced they use the digital thermometer to check the dishwasher to ensure it is sanitizing to temperature. After four cycles, the dishwasher displayed a wash temperature of 156 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and a final rinse temperature of 187 degrees F. Staff E…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to prevent bare hands from contacting food during food preparation and keep cold foods below 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) during meal service. The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include:Observation on 4/28/26 at 10:26 AM Staff D, Lead [NAME] opened a plastic package of buns with her bare hands and proceeded to remove three buns from the bag and place the buns into a blender as she prepared a pureed taco burger for Resident #10. At 10:50 AM Staff D moved a dirty blender, measuring cup and spatula to the left side of the countertop, wiped her hands on along her uniform at both sides of her hips, then used a spatula to scrape three cookies off a baking sheet touching the cookies with her left hand as she scraped them from the baking sheet onto the spatula to place into a blender to puree. The pureed taco burger and cookie were served out to resident #10 during the lunch meal service. Observation on 4/28/26 at 11:25 AM the Nutrition and Food Service Supervisor (NFSS) washed her hands, applied…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an electronic health record (EHR) review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to submit a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessment for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #7). The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include: Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of anxiety disorder, depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD- mental health condition triggered by experiencing or witnessing terrifying events). Resident #7 current PASRR Level 1 Screening Outcome dated 10/11/23 reflected a PASRR Level 1 outcome for no Level II required- no serious mental illness (MI)/intellectual disability (ID)/related condition (RC). The Level I included diagnosis of anxiety disorder and depression.Review of the EHR medical diagnoses listed active diagnoses of PTSD and major depressive disorder…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to implement a Baseline Care Plan for 1 of 3 newly admitted residents (Resident #21). The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include:Resident #21's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. Resident #21's diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, and depression. Resident #21 required staff assistance for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and used a walker and wheelchair for mobility.In an interview on 4/30/26 at 10:17 AM, the MDS Coordinator confirmed that Resident #21 was admitted on [DATE] and the Baseline Care Plan should have been completed within 48 hours.In an interview on 4/29/26 at 11:35 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the MDS Coordinator covered two facilities. The DON acknowledged that the facility experienced a breakdown in communication regarding who was responsible for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to implement a Comprehensive Care Plan to include psychotropic medications for 1 of 3 newly admitted residents (Resident #21). The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings include: Resident #21's MDS assessment dated [DATE], triggered Care Area Assessments (CAAs) for cognitive loss/dementia, urinary incontinence, psychosocial well-being, activities, falls, nutritional status, pressure ulcers, and psychotropic drugs. Resident #21 took antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant medications and was working with physical therapy.A review of Resident #21's Comprehensive Care Plan on 4/28/26 revealed that it did not include psychotropic medication monitoring or side effects.In an interview on 4/30/26 at 10:17 AM, the MDS Coordinator stated that a Comprehensive Care Plan should include medications, ADLs, diagnoses, skin integrity, treatments, falls, infections, and triggered items from the MDS. Regarding Resident #21, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to revise 1 of 1 residents Care Plan after the resident had Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) symptoms and was put on an antibiotic for a UTI (Resident #16). The facility reported a census of 57 residents:Findings include: Resident #16's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Resident #16's diagnoses included dementia, personal history of urinary tract infections, and benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate).Review of Resident #16's Communication/Visit with Physician progress note indicated that on 4/23/26 at 3:16 AM, the Physician responded to a fax regarding malodorous urine and increased weakness, and the Physician ordered a urinalysis with Culture and Sensitivity (C&S) for Resident #16.Resident #16's Health Status progress note showed that on 4/27/26, the Physician Assistant-Certified (PA-C) ordered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide assessment and intervention for a resident who presented with Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) symptoms and obtain a Urinalysis (UA) timely after it was ordered by his Provider for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for UTI (Resident #16). The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: Resident #16's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS noted Resident #16 required substantial to maximal assistance with toileting and transfers and was always incontinent of urine (loss of bladder control). Resident #16's diagnoses included dementia, personal history of urinary tract infections, benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate) with lower urinary tract symptoms, and weakness. On 4/20/26 at 4:12 PM, the Health Status progress note indicated a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) provided…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility staff failed to provide 2 of 2 residents restorative programs as frequently as the program ordered (Resident #28 and Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #28's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated he entered the facility in October 2011 and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He relied on staff for toileting, shower/bathing, and moving from a sitting to standing position. He did not complete a Restorative Program for at least 15 minutes during the past 7 days. He had diagnoses of a need for assistance with personal care, other abnormalities of gait (walking pattern) and mobility, and a traumatic brain injury. Resident #28's Care Plan, last revised on 12/8/25, included 3 Restorative Programs related to his traumatic brain injury: ambulation in the hallway, riding a pedaled bike for 15 minutes, and lifting a 4…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0868 — pattern
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee consisting at a minimum the Director of Nursing (DON), the Medical Director or his/her designee; at least three other members of the facility's staff, at least one of who must be the administrator, owner, a board member or other individual in a leadership role; and the Infection Preventionist (IP) were all in attendance for the first quarter of 2025 Quality Assurance (QA) meeting. The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include: Record review of the facilities Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI) committee meeting Sign-in Sheet's for the first quarter of 2025 revealed the following: 1/24/25 - Medical Director and IP not in attendance 2/21/25 - Medical Director and IP not in attendance 3/28/25 - DON and IP not in attendance During an interview on 4/16/25 at 11:08 AM the Administrator revealed she would like the Medical Director to attend monthly meetings but scheduling has been hard and would expect all required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on electronic health record (EHR) review, Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 user's manual review, and staff interviews the facility failed to submit six completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #201). The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include: A review of the EHR, MDS detail listing for Resident #201 revealed the following: 3/13/2025 - Annual - None PPS / M D S 3.0 - Completed 12/19/2024 - Quarterly - None PPS / M D S 3.0 - Completed 10/3/2024 - Quarterly - None PPS / M D S 3.0 - Completed 7/18/2024 - Quarterly - None PPS / M D S 3.0 - Completed 6/11/2024 - End of PPS Part A Stay / M D S 3.0 - Completed 4/20/2024 - admission /Medicare - 5 Day / M D S 3.0 - Completed 4/17/2024 - Entry / M D S 3.0 - Accepted A review of all completed but not accepted MDS's for Resident #201 documented the unit was neither Medicare nor Medicaid certified and MDS data is not required by the state. The submission information for all completed but not accepted MDS's for Resident #201 documented do not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-09-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $929K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA