Good Samaritan - George

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 36 beds and averages 32.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.20 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.38 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility investigation review, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy review the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse to a supervisor and the alleged prepetrator continued to work unattended behind closed doors with other residents. On June 27, 2024, the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) learned of a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) slapping Resident #12 on his upper arm which occurred on June 19, 2024. This failure resulted in residents living at the facility to be exposed to the potential of abuse therefore causing an Immediate Jeopardy to the health, safety, and security of the resident. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of June 19, 2024 on August 27, 2024 at 2:01 p.m The facility staff removed the IJ on June 27, 2024 through the following actions: a. The local police, residents physician and family/responsible party were notified of the allegation on 6/27/24. An initial report was made to DIAL on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents at risk for elopement were unable to exit the facility unattended for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for elopement (Resident #31). The facility failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy to the health, safety, and security of the residents. The facility reported a total census of 33 residents. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of May 3, 2023 on September 20, 2023 at 2:30 p.m., The Facility Staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on May 3, 2023 through the following actions: a. Resident #31 ' s wander guard was checked and working. All other residents who wear a wander guard were checked immediately and all were working. b. Maintenance checked that all doors and alarms were functioning. c. Elopement drill was performed that shift on 5/3/2023, Day shift on 5/4/2023 and continued to be performed until all staff are present for at least…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report from Fiscal Quarter 2, 2025 (January 1 through March 31) review, facility staffing review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to meet staffing requirements in all metrics. The facility reported a census of 31 residents.Findings include:The PBJ Staffing Data Report with a run date of 8/13/25 triggered submitted weekend staffing data excessively low within the quarter.Review of staffing for nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) scheduled similarly for weekdays and weekends. In an interview on 8/21/25 AM at 9:05 AM, the Administrator reported he had no knowledge of how the corporate office submitted staffing data. The Administrator reported the data should reflect that weekend staffing remained the same as during the week. The Administrator reported the facility failed to have a policy regarding PBJ.In an interview on 8/21/25 AM at 9:05 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported the low weekend staffing data error may have occurred when the corporate office…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility staff failed to serve proper serving amounts for residents. The facility identified a census of 31 residents. Findings include:During an ongoing observation on 8/20/2025 at 11:21 a.m., of Staff A, [NAME] completed the puree process for 2 residents in the facility. Staff A added 3 servings of meat, potatoes, roll and gravy into the blender and added a couple spoons full of thickener and pureed the mixture. When the process was completed, Staff A placed the mixture into the measuring cup and had a total of 3 cups of pureed food. According to the chart the residents were to get 2 #8 scoops of the mixture. Staff A then added 3 servings of spinach to the blender, a couple scoops of thickener and added butter and pureed the mixture until smooth. Once the mixture was smooth Staff A poured the mixture into a measuring cup and the amount was over the 1 cup measurement on the cup. Staff A stated the measurement was 1 and 1/4 cup. When asked how Staff A knew for sure there was 1 and 1/4 cup of food in the measuring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions. The facility identified a census of 31 residents.Findings include: On 8/18/2025 at 10:49 a.m., during the initial walkthrough in the kitchen was conducted and following concerns were noted. The following items were in the kitchen open and ready for use:a. open container of Cheerios with no label and no open dateb. open container of rice cereal with no label and no open datec. open bottle or raspberry syrup with no label and no open dated. open container of oatmeal with no label and no open date e. open box of cornstarch with no label and no open date. The following items were in the refrigerator read for use:a. 32 servings of cake uncovered on a tray b. open carton of liquid egg with no open datec. open carton of heavy whipping cream with no open dated. open gallon of white milk with no open datee. pitcher of orange juice with no open datef. pitcher of apple juice with no open dateg. open carton of thickened water with no open…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure bed hold notice was signed by residents and or the resident's responsible person when residents transferred out of the facility for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Residents #7). The facility reported a census of 31 residents.Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #7 documented diagnoses of hypertension, anemia and arthritis. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #7's Census tab revealed the following information:11/7/24- no pay hospital leave11/8/24- active12/10/24- no pay hospital leave12/12/24- active Review of Progress Notes revealed the following:On 11/7/24 at 8:47 p.m., resident will be admitted to hospital for observation. On 11/8/24 at 5:07 p.m., resident arrived back at the facility. On 12/10/24 at 9:02 a.m., resident left facility to hospital for hip surgery.On 12/12/24 at 1:13…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews and policy reviews, the facility failed to provide staff with current continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine settings, failed to enter the faxed order into the electronic chart, and failed to enter CPAP information into the care plan for 1 of 12 residents reviewed (Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #6 documented diagnoses of renal insufficiency, diabetes and anemia. The MDS failed to indicate Resident #6 used a non-invasive mechanical ventilator. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. In an interview on 8/19/2025 at 11:03 AM, Resident #6 reported using a CPAP nightly.Observation on 8/19/25 at 1:48 PM revealed a CPAP on Resident #6's bedside table. The faxed Physician's Order dated 6/19/25 for Resident #6 showed an order for a CPAP.The Order Summary Report with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the menu, observation, and staff interviews the facility failed to serve the full portions of food and failed to consistently fill and empty scoop utensils when preparing meals for residents. The facility identified a census of 27 residents. Findings include: In an interview on 8/28/24 at 11:35 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) reported the meals for 8/27/24 and today were partially switched due to meat not being completely thawed. The following replacement meal served to residents per the DM: a. 4 ounces (oz.) pork loin b. 2 oz. pork gravy c. 4 oz. mashed potatoes d. 4 oz. corn e. Bun with margarine Residents on a pureed diet received: a. 4 oz. minced pork loin b. 2 oz. pork gravy c. 4 oz. mashed potatoes d. 4 oz. minced buttered broccoli florets e. Bun with margarine pureed During meal service the DM failed to completely fill and empty the scoop when serving corn and minced pork. When asked if scoops should be completely filled and emptied when plating food, the DM reported yes, but thought the scoop used to serve corn looked too big. The DM reviewed the information…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0851 — pattern
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report (January 1-March 31) review, facility staffing reports review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit accurate staff reports for the PBJ Staffing Data Report. The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: The PBJ Staffing Data Report run date 8/21/24 triggered for excessively low weekend staffing- submitted weekend staffing data is excessively low and failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 Hours/Day - four or more days within the Quarter with <24 Hours/Day Licensed Nursing Coverage. Review of staffing for nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) scheduled similarly for weekdays and weekends. No issues for nursing coverage found. In an interview on 8/26/24 at 8:57 AM, the Administrator and Director of Nursing reported incorrect payroll data resulted from the amount of hours the employees were not punched in for breaks and worked to correct the issue. The facility planned to check with CMS to see if the change impacted the most…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility record review, staff interviews and facility policy the facility failed to appropriately implement interventions to protect 1 out of 3 residents reviewed from physical abuse, (Resident #12). The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #12 documented diagnoses of stroke, hypertension and depression. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the facility provided Incident Report dated 6/27/24 at 5:00 p.m., completed by the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) staff presented to my office to report that on 6/19/24 while providing bedtime cares one of the other CNA staff was frustrated with Resident #12 when he yelled out as his pericare was being provided and she swatted his upper arm as he yelled out. Review of Resident #12 ' s Progress Notes revealed on 6/27/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Iowa Department of Inspections & Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) within 2 hours of an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse (Resident #12). The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #12 documented diagnoses of stroke, hypertension and depression. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the facility provided Incident Report dated 6/27/24 at 5:00 p.m., completed by the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) staff presented to my office to report that on 6/19/24 while providing bedtime cares one of the other CNA staff was frustrated with Resident #12 when he yelled out as his pericare was being provided and she swatted his upper arm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to provide proper hand hygiene during urinary catheter care for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #16). The facility reported a total census of 27 residents. Findings include: Observation on 8/28/24 at 1:09 PM, Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) donned personal protective equipment (PPE) then retrieved the urine colander out of the closet. Staff D placed the colander in the bathroom, removed and discarded gloves, failed to complete hand hygiene then donned new gloves. Staff D lowered Resident #16's pants then assisted the resident to sit in the recliner. Staff D removed and discarded gloves, failed to complete hand hygiene then donned new gloves. Staff A cleansed the leg bag urine catheter drainage spout, drained the urine, cleansed the drainage spout then placed the spout back into the holder. Staff D emptied urine from the colander into the toilet, removed and discarded gloves, failed to complete hand hygiene then donned new gloves. Staff D then assisted the resident to pull up and fasten pants. Staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$18,142 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $8,827 — penalty dated 2024-08-29
• $9,315 — penalty dated 2023-09-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 54 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $626K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA