Aperion Care Dekalb
1212 South Second Street, Dekalb, IL 60115 · For profit - Corporation · 119 certified beds · (815) 758-8151 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $44,190 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-23)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.8% | 13.4% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 6.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 98.9% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.1% | 14.3% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.7% | 18.3% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.5% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.3% | 20.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.8% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 16.2% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.6% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 24.7% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.60 | 2.02 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.99 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 93 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 64.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.9%CMS range 39.4–59.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 6.9–13.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 3.9–12.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.20 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 75.1 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow wound treatment orders for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for wounds in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R1's wound deteriorating and requiring R1 to be hospitalized and recieve a surgical intervention. The findings include: On 6/17/25 at 9:00 AM, R1 was in bed with an intravenous antibiotic infusing to a peripherally inserted central catheter in his left arm. R1's left leg was amputated below the knee and was wrapped in a dressing with a wound vacuum attached. R1 said he originally had surgery on his knee back around the Superbowl of this year. R1 said the wound had been infected and he has had pills and shots and surgery and now this. R1 said the wound became infected and he was sent to the hospital and the surgeon did a procedure a couple weeks ago. R1 said he was in the hospital for 6 days where they jabbed him with more needles. R1 said now they have him hooked up to the antibiotics and the wound vac machine. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to safely reposition a resident in bed for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for safety/supervision in the sample of three. This failure resulted in R1 rolling out of bed onto the floor and experiencing increased pain and a humeral fracture. This past noncompliance occurred from March 11, 2025- March 17, 2025. The findings include: R1's Face Sheet dated March 19, 2025, shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia, dysphagia, aphasia, unsteadiness on feet, contracture left knee, low back pain, adjustment disorder with anxiety, depression, and heart failure. R1's Care Plan initiated December 8, 2022, shows R1 had an ADL self care performance deficit related to a stroke with left side effected. R1 was at risk for falls. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated March 4, 2025, shows, R1 had an impairment to one side of her upper and lower extremities. R1 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. R1 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify a wound prior to becoming an unstageable wound, failed to have pressure ulcer interventions in place, and failed to ensure wound treatment orders were in place for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 3. These failures resulted in R1 being at an increased risk of infection and delayed wound healing. The findings include: 1. R1's face sheet printed on 3/6/25 showed diagnoses including but not limited to encephalopathy, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, malnutrition, Alzheimer disease, and chronic kidney disease. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed severe cognitive impairment and total staff assistance required for hygiene, transfers, and bed mobility. The same assessment showed R1 is always incontinent of urine and bowel. R1's pressure ulcer risk assessment dated [DATE] showed a moderate risk for pressure ulcer development. R1's medical record showed an original facility admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify that a resident who is at risk for developing pressure injuries and who had a pressure injury would be at a higher risk for developing a second pressure injury; and failed to implement preventative measures and adequate skin assessments for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for wounds in a sample size of 7. This failure resulted in R1 developing two pressure injuries to the back of his ears that were both identified at a stage 3 when found. Findings include: R1's face sheet indicated that resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a past medical history not limited to sepsis, acute respiratory failure, pneumonitis, encephalopathy, scoliosis, dysphagia; and discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. R1's admission pressure ulcer risk assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 is at moderate risk for developing pressure injuries. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Resident Assessment and Care Screening, dated 02/03/2025 documented that R1 was dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify areas of pressure, assess areas of pressure and implement interventions for pressure prevention. These failures resulted in deterioration of the pressure area for R22. These failures resulted in R43's pressure deteriorating into an unstageable pressure injury. These failures resulted in R178 developing a deep tissue injury. This applies to 3 of 8 residents (R22, R43, R178) in the sample of 19 reviewed for pressure. The findings include: 1. The facility face sheet for R22 shows diagnosis to include dementia, hypertension, schizoaffective disorder. R22's facility assessment dated [DATE] shows R22 has severe cognitive impairment and requires extensive assistance of 2 for bed mobility and is always incontinent of urine. The facility wound report printed on 8/3/2022 shows R22 had a stage 4 pressure injury to her coccyx on 3/23/2022. The initial wound report dated 3/23/2022 by the facility shows a stage 4 facility acquired pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean environment for seven residents. This applies to seven of ten residents (R1-R7) reviewed for environment in the sample of ten.The findings include:1. On 6/30/26 at 9:42 AM, R1 said a few days ago he got up at 6:30 AM to use the bathroom and the floor surrounding the toilet was covered with urine. V1 said there was so much urine he could not avoid it and his socks got saturated with urine. V1 said he asked the staff 6-7 times to clean it up and no one did. V1 said by 2:30 PM he had grown so frustrated, he used his cell phone and called the facility to report the urine on his bathroom floor. V1 said finally a staff member came to his room and cleaned it up. The facility assessment dated [DATE] shows him to be cognitively intact.2. On 6/30/26 at 8:50 AM, R2 said the housekeeping staff would just push the dirt around with the mop. R2 said the floor up against the walls is caked with black debris and she can't tell if it's dirty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain the south shower room in a safe, sanitary, functional and comfortable condition for residents. This applies to 51 residents residing on the south wing. The findings include: The findings include:The facility census dated 3/31/26 showed 51 residents reside on the south hall. On 3/31/26 at 11:30 AM, R4 was sitting up on the edge of his bed. R4 said he takes a shower at the facility and when he first came to the facility he had to use the south shower room, but then he found out about the north shower room, and he prefers to use it. R4 said it would be nice if the shower room on this side of the building had warm water. I had to take a shower in there a few times and it was cold to luke warm water. That's no way to take a shower. R4 said we should be able to take a nice shower in warm water.On 3/31/26 at 11:41 AM, R6 said she gets showers, but she goes to the shower on the other side of the building (north) because the south shower doesn't have warm water. On 3/31/26 at 11:48 AM, V4 (Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to a resident with a history of falling for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls in the sample of 6. The findings include:The facility's Fall Report dated 10/31/25 to 3/31/26 showed R1 had un-witnessed falls on 2/1/26 at 10:15 AM, 2/10/26 at 2:20 PM, and 2/20/26 at 8:50 PM. R1's Facesheet dated 3/31/26 showed she had diagnoses to include, but not limited to unspecified fracture of right patella for closed fracture routine healing (1/15/26); diabetes; unsteadiness on feet; abnormalities of gait and mobility; fracture of right pubis (1/15/26); gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); chronic gout; history of falling; dementia; major depressive disorder; age related osteoporosis; osteoarthritis and hypertension. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed she had severe cognitive impairment; required partial/moderate assistance with toilet hygiene and bed mobility; required substantial/max assist for shower/bathing, sit to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide ordered wound care for 2 of 3 residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for nursing care/wound care in the sample of 13. The findings include: 1. R3's admission Record showed diagnoses to include but not limited to dementia, diabetes type 2, heart failure, and an antibiotic resistant organism infection. R3's 12/10/25 Wound Assessment Details Report showed he had an open venous stasis (poor venous circulation) ulcer to his left lower leg front measuring 7.5 centimeters (cm) by 2.0 cm by 0.1 cm deep. The wound assessment showed a second wound/skin tear to his right lower leg measuring 2.0 cm by 1.5 cm by 0.0 cm deep. R3's November 2025 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed an order for daily wound treatments to his left and right legs. The treatments consisted of cleansing, ointments, oil emulsion dressings, and gauze wraps. The order was started on 10/16/25. The TAR showed treatments were not documented as having been done on 11/3/25, 11/16/25, 11/20/25, 11/25/25, and 11/28/25. R3's December 2025 TAR showed the same…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide ordered medications and failed to administer the correct medication. This applies to 2 of 5 (R5 & R1) reviewed for medications in the sample of 13.The findings include: 1. R5's admission Record showed diagnoses to include but not limited to stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillation (rapid and irregular heartbeat). R5's December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed her 12/18/25 diltiazem for her congestive heart failure 240 milligrams (mg) extended release medication was documented as not given. R5's MAR also showed her 12/18/25 duloxetine 30 mg for her depression was documented as not given. On 12/18/25 at 9:20 AM, V4 stated R5 was out of her duloxetine and diltiazem. V4 stated the medication refills were rejected by the pharmacy for an unknown reason. V4 said the diltiazem was rejected on 12/15/25 and the duloxetine was rejected on 12/17/25. V4 stated it is the policy that the nurses notify the Director of Nursing if medications are rejected. On 12/19/25 at 9:30 AM, R5's December 2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-06 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dietary support staff completed a food handler's training course within thirty days of hire and failed to have a policy in place to ensure dietary staff complete this required training for safe food handling per Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) regulations. This failure affects all 80 residents who currently reside at the facility.The findings include:Facility data sheet completed by V1 (Administrator) and dated 12/06/2025 indicated 80 residents currently reside at the facility. On 12/06/2025 from 12:05 to 12:38 PM, main dining room and kitchen observations were conducted. During this time, V5, V6, V7 (Dietary Aides) and V8 (Cook) were all observed preparing lunch trays and handling resident's food in the kitchen.On 12/06/2025 at 01:55 PM, V5 (Dietary Aide) said she is food handler certified then added that the course is about three hours long and included a lot of information related to safety in food service. On 12/06/2025 at 01:57 PM, V6 (Dietary Aide) said she has been employed by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was not verbally abused by staff. This applies to 1 of 4 (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 4. The findings include: On 5/12/2025 at 9:55AM, V7 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) said she was working on 5/2/2025 on the evening shift with [V3 CNA]. V7 said [V3] seemed to be frustrated that day. V7 said [V3] was helping [R1] with her communication device and the device fell onto the resident's leg. V7 said [R1] was crying and [V3] was saying sorry to [R1]. V7 said [R1] wasn't communicating with staff and [V3] started mocking her with fake crying and copying what the resident was saying. On 5/12/2025 at 10:06AM, V3 said she was working on 5/2/2025 and was caring for [R1] that day. V3 said [R1] wanted her communication device, and she was trying to help her with that. V3 said the latch slipped and the monitor fell out on the resident's shin/foot area. V3 said [R1] was crying, and she went to get her an ice pack. V3 said the resident would not stop crying. V3 said she told [R1] you need to be quiet. V3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to notify a resident representative of an advanced stage wound for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for notification of changes in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's face sheet printed on 3/6/25 showed diagnoses including but not limited to encephalopathy, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, malnutrition, Alzheimer disease, and chronic kidney disease. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed severe cognitive impairment and total staff assistance required for hygiene, transfers, and bed mobility. The same assessment showed R1 is always incontinent of urine and bowel. R1's medical record showed an original facility admission on [DATE]. The record showed R1 was sent to the local hospital on 2/25 and returned 2/28. R1's hospital records showed a wound consult on 2/27/25. An unstageable coccyx pressure ulcer (lower back/upper buttocks area) measuring 4.5 cm x 2 cm (centimeters) was present. The note showed the wound was present upon admission to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the physician of an ongoing change in condition in a timely manner. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for notification of changes in the sample of 5. The findings include: R1's eINTERACT change in condition evaluation dated December 18, 2024, shows, she had a change in condition of weakness that started the morning of December 18, 2024. The same evaluation continues to show, V5 Nurse Practitioner (NP) was notified of the changes, and nothing was ordered or done. On January 8, 2024, at 12:48 PM, V5 NP stated she did not recall if she was notified of R1's change in condition or not. There was nothing documented in R1's chart that showed she was. I get so many messages; I can't remember them all. R1's progress notes continue to show, her condition stays the same with no changes. R1's electronic medical records did not show any other documentation that R1's primary care physician or Nurse Practitioner were notified of any changes in condition from December 18th - December 22, 2024. On January 8, 2024, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify and assess a resident for an ongoing change in condition. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 5. The findings include: R1's face sheet lists her diagnoses to include: cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus II, cerebral aneurysm, hemiplegia, adjustment disorder with anxiety and dementia. R1's eINTERACT change in condition evaluation dated December 18, 2024, shows, she had a change in condition of weakness that started the morning of December 18, 2024. The evaluation shows, she has weakness or hemiparesis, arm or leg: Gradual recent onset not resolving spontaneously. There is nothing else documented in R1's electronic medical record about her change of condition until December 21, 2024 (2 days later). R1's 72 hours charting progress notes dated December 21, 2024, at 2:06 PM and 6:08 PM show, Since the change in condition, the symptoms have remained the same. still weak and unable to feed herself. being assisted in eating. Vitals within normal limits. The physician that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medication orders were verified prior to administering medications for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 8. The findings include: R1's face sheet shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: joint replacement surgery, major depressive disorder and history of falls. A nursing progress note completed on 10/14/24 at 1:56 PM for R1, shows R1 had went out to an appointment with a podiatrist and returned to the facility with new orders for Oxycodone 10-325 milligrams (mg.) every six hours as needed for pain, and to discontinue the current order for Hydrocodone 5-325 mg. R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 10/1/24-10/31/24 and her current Physicians Order Summary both show the order was carried out and Oxycodone was started, and Hydrocodone was discontinued on 10/14/24. On 10/15/24 at 8:45 AM, R1 said she had gone out to a doctor's appointment yesterday and her medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by not removing staff from resident care during an abuse investigation for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. The findings include: On 9/17/24 at 11:27 AM, V6 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) said the morning of 9/12/24 she was assigned to the north hall. V6 said she went to the south hall to retrieve a sling. V6 said V2 Social Services Director stopped her on the south hall and asked her to assist R1. V6 said she went into R1's room and assisted him to clean up, get dressed and transferred to a wheelchair. V6 said R1 became rude and agitated that V6 had to leave to continue providing care on her assigned hall. V6 said she did not push or lay her hands on R1 in an aggressive manner. V6 said she left the room and reported to the nurse R1's change in temperament and the need for another staff person to approach him. V6 said she returned to the north hall to continue providing care for the residents for at least an hour before she was called in to a meeting with V2 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. On 7/15/24 at 9:58 AM, R61's bed (hospital bed that raised up and down) and air mattress pump were plugged into a power strip. 5. On 7/15/24 at 10:17 AM, R11 had an air mattress pump hanging on the headboard of the bed. The air mattress pump was plugged into a power strip. 6. On 7/15/24 at 10:03 AM, R53 had an air mattress pump hanging on the headboard of the bed. The air mattress pump was plugged into a power strip. On 7/15/24 at 12:40 PM, V12 (Maintenance Director) said medical equipment should be plugged into wall outlets and not power strips. V12 added power strips are not used because they can be turned off or easily lose power. V12 said medical equipment should be plugged into a wall outlet because a wall outlet provided a more reliable source of electricity. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to supervise 1 resident (R36) at risk for aspirating foods during meals. The facility failed to ensure 2 residents (R34, R46) were transferred in a safe manner. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prepare and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This applies to 5 of 5 (R3, R26, R14, R36, R23) residents reviewed for pureed diets in the sample of 74. The findings include: On 7/15/24 at 11:04 AM, V17 (Cook) was observed at the food prep table making pureed pasta and meat. V17 picked up an oven mitt which had fallen on the floor and placed it back onto the clean food prep table near the blender and did not wash her hands. On 7/17/24 at 8:41 AM, V15 (Food Service Director/FSD) said if things fall on the floor they should be put in a dirty area and not near clean food. V15 said hand washing should be completed after picking something up from the floor. The facility provided pureed diet list dated 7/18/24 shows R3, R26, R14, R36, R23 as being on pureed diets.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided for a resident dependent on staff for cares. This applies to 1 one 18 residents (R18) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) in the sample of 18. The findings include: R18's ADL care plan initiated on 5/22/24 shows she is totally dependent on staff for toileting and bed mobility. R18's 5/7/24 Minimum Data Set assessment shows she is cognitively intact. On 7/15/24 at 9:48 AM, R18 was lying in bed a faint odor of urine was noted. R18 stated, I haven't been changed since about 5 AM today. I need staff to change me, and they are busy and have not been in. I am incontinent of urine and wear a brief and course I am wet I take a water pill. On 7/15/24 at 10:05 AM, V9 (Certified Nursing Assistant) said R18 had not been changed yet that morning and she would be in to change her. V9 said incontinence care should be done every 2 hours and as needed. The facility provided Incontinence Care Policy revised on 1/16/18 shows the purpose of incontinence care is to prevent skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment for a resident's fractured arm. The facility failed to obtain daily weights for a resident with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure. These failures apply to 2 of 18 residents (R34, R18) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R34's fall note and nurses notes dated 7/5/24 showed R34 had an unwitnessed fall in the facility. R34 was sent to a local hospital for an evaluation where she was diagnosed with a fracture of her left ulna (arm). R34's nurses note dated 7/12/24 showed R34 was seen by an orthopedic physician for her fractured arm. The note showed, The paperwork the resident returned with said for her to continue to maintain splint at all times and to cover when showering. Splint may be removed at the sink to wash arm/hand but avoid wrist/forearm motion when splint comes off for cleaning at the sink . A physician order for R34, dated 7/11/24, showed R34 was to continue to maintain her left arm splint at all times and to cover it when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to obtain physician prescribed medication and failed to follow physician orders for eye drops for 2 of 18 residents (R2, R32) reviewed for physician services in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R2's 7/1/24-7/31/24 Medication Administration Summary shows she should receive Farxiga 5 milligrams (mg.) at 9:00 AM and Memantine 10 mg. at 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM. R2's active Physician Order Summary shows orders for both Farxiga and Memantine. On 7/16/24 at 8:10 AM, V8 (Registered Nurse/RN) administered medication to R2 and omitted Memantine and Farxiga because he did not have it in the cart and said it looks like it was ordered from the pharmacy on 6/14/24 but has not arrived at the facility. On 7/16/24 at 9:44 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said she was aware that R2 did not receive the 2 morning medications that were prescribed, and she called the pharmacy who told her it was a medication reordered too soon. V2 said she asked pharmacy to check why the medication is considered too soon to fill and was awaiting a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident on a PRN (as needed) antipsychotic medication was evaluated by a physician after 14 days and failed to monitor a resident for antipsychotic side effects by not doing an AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) test every 6 months for 2 of 5 residents (R32, R11) reviewed for psychotropic medications in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R32's Physician Order shows an active order dated 5/28/24 for Seroquel Oral Tablet 25 mg (milligrams). Give 25 mg by mouth every 24 hours PRN for anxiety. R32's Consultant Pharmacist Recommendations to MD (physician) dated 6/28/24 shows Resident has an order for the antipsychotic quetiapine (Seroquel) 25 mg 1 tab(let) every 24 hours PRN with no stop date. In accordance with State and Federal Guidelines PRN (as needed) orders for antipsychotic medications are limited to 14 days with no exceptions. To continue use of PRN antipsychotic beyond 14 days, the attending physician or prescribing practitioner must first directly evaluate the resident to determine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to administer physician prescribed medications as ordered. There were 29 opportunities with 3 errors resulting in a 10.34% error rate. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R2, R12) observed during medication pass. The findings include: 1. R2's July 2024 Medication Administration Summary shows she should receive Farxiga 5 milligrams (mg.) at 9:00 AM and Memantine 10 mg. at 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM. R2's active Physician Order Summary shows orders for both Farxiga and Memantine. On 7/16/24 at 8:20 AM, V8 (Registered Nurse/RN) administered medication to R2 and omitted Memantine and Farxiga because he did not have it in the cart. V8 said he could not give those medications because they were not in the medication dispensing system the facility has. On 7/16/24 at 9:44 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said she was aware that R2 did not receive the 2 morning medications that were prescribed. 2. R12's Physician Order Summary dated 12/17/22 and Medication Administration Record dated July 2024 each showed R12 was to receive a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to explain binding arbitration in a manner the resident understood. This applies 1 of 3 (R68) in the sample of 18 reviewed for arbitration. The findings include: On 7/16/24 at 9:08 AM, R68 said she does not recall signing an arbitration agreement. R68 said if she did it was one of those sign here things and wasn't explained. R68 said she does not recall being told about arbitration at all. R68 said she would not have signed a document like that if it was explained to her. R68 said she would not give up her right to litigation. On 7/16/24 at 12:46 PM, V1 (Administrator) said the arbitration agreement is completed upon admission. V1 said residents aren't required to sign it to be admitted , they have 30 days to rescind it, the arbitrator's decision is final, and the resident will not be entitled to attorney fees. R68's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows a BIMS score for 15, cognitively intact. R68's admission Record show's an admission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff wore Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for a resident on Contact Isolation and a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 2 of 18 residents (R6, R16) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 7/15/24 at 9:52 AM, R6 had a contact isolation sign posted outside the room. Two staff where observed walking into R6's room with no PPE on. V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) and V14 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) came out of R6's room at 9:54 AM. R6 was observed sitting up in bed. V12 stated We boosted her up, me and the nurse. We should have worn PPE, a gown and gloves because she is on contact isolation for a urinary tract infection and is incontinent. R6's Urine Culture Lab Report dated 7/2/24 shows Positive for ESBL (Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase. ESBL-producing organisms are resistant to common antibiotics). Isolation precautions may be required. Please refer to you Infection Control Policy. On 07/16/24 at 01:27 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe transfer for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include disease of spinal cord, Parkinson's Disease, weakness, repeated falls, ataxia, schizophrenia, and anxiety disorder. R1's physical therapy evaluation dated 9/19/23 showed he was a two person max assist for transfers. R1's Post Fall Assessment form dated 9/21/23 showed R1 fell during a staff assisted transfer. This assessment showed, Resident unable to bear weight during transfer . R1's 9/25/23 Fall IDT (Interdisciplinary team) note showed, . Resident was lowered to the floor during a transfer after [R1's] knees buckled. Root cause of fall: Resident was inappropriately transferred via 2 CNA assist . On 11/17/23 at 1:00 PM, V7 CNA said they are always supposed to use a gait belt for residents who require assistance for transfers to prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for falls in the sample of 8. The finding include: R2's face sheet showed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 6/22/23 with diagnosis of hydrocephalus, cerebral cysts, cerebral infarction, dementia, metabolic encephalopathy, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. This face sheet photograph showed a smiling female with a helmet on. R2 was not provided activities or access to a call light during observations. On 10/11/23 at 8:38 AM, R2 was seated in a recliner near the south nurse's station. There was no call light available for R2's use at that location. At 8:42 AM, R2 was assisted to ambulate from the south hall to the dining room by V8 Certified Nursing Assistant- CNA. R2 had a shuffling gait (walking while dragging feet without lifting the feet fully from the ground). V8 held R2's hand while walking with her and did not use a gait belt. R2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance for residents' requiring extensive assistance with ADLs for two of three residents (R2, R3) reviewed for ADL assistance in the sample of three. The findings include: 1. R2's Face Sheet shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including primary lateral sclerosis, dysphagia, exposure to Covid-19, osteoarthritis, lack of coordination, urinary tract infection, bipolar, motor neuron disease, urinary incontinence, cognitive communication deficit, and pain. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated August 8, 2023, shows R2 is cognitively intact. R2 has showed no rejection of care behaviors and requires extensive assistance of two staff for toilet use and requires total assistance with personal hygiene. R2 is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. On September 27, 2023, R2 was observed in the same spot in his room and in his wheeled recliner at various times from 9:32 AM-12:18…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure multidose insulin pens were labeled with an open date for 4 of 4 (R59, R8, R33, R37) residents reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 8/15/2023 at 1:11PM, the facility's southwest medication cart was checked with V17 Registered Nurse (RN). On 8/15/2023 at 1:11PM, R8's Lispro Insulin pen was not labeled with an opened date. On 8/15/2023 at 1:57PM, the facility's southeast medication cart was checked with V7 RN. On 8/15/2023 at 1:57PM, R37's Lispro Insulin (Lyumjev Kwik) pen was not labeled with an opened date. On 8/15/2023 at 1:57PM, R59's Insulin Glargine pen and Insulin Lispro pen were not labeled with an opened date. On 8/15/2023 at 1:57PM, R33's Humalog Kwik insulin pen was not labeled with an opened date. V17 said R8's insulin pen was in use and should be labeled with an open date. V17 said the insulin pen is good for 28 days after being opened. On 8/15/2023 at 1:57PM, V7 said R37, R59, and R33's insulin pens were in use and did not have an opened date. V7 said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their lunch menu by not serving the pureed bread option for four of four residents (R45, R60, R19, R36) reviewed for food menus in the sample of 18. The findings include: The facility's Menu dated August 13-August 19, 2023, shows a dinner roll on the menu for the lunch meal on August 14, 2023. The facility's Diet Spreadsheet dated Spring/Summer 2023 shows residents on pureed diet should receive a pureed dinner roll. 1. R45's Medication Review Report dated August 16, 2023, shows R45 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia and an order for a pureed diet. 2. R60's Order Summary Report dated August 16, 2023, shows R60 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit and altered mental status and an order for a pureed diet. 3. R19's Order Summary Report dated August 16, 2023, shows R19 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia and an order for a pureed diet. 4. R36's Order Summary Report dated August 16, 2023, shows R36 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assist a resident with discharge planning. This applies to 1 of 18 residents (R35) reviewed for discharge planning in the sample of 18. The findings include: R35's electronic medical record (EMR) shows he is a [AGE] year old male that was admitted to the facility on [DATE] (1 year and 1/2 ago) with a fractured hip. His EMR lists his diagnoses to include: discitis lumbar region, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia, hypertension, unspecified dementia, alcoholic polyneuropathy, fracture of right femur, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, alcohol abuse, major depressive disorder and vascular dementia. On August 14, 2023, at 9:48 AM, R35 stated, he wants to leave the facility and doesn't belong there. They aren't helping me get out of here. They tell me to do my homework and won't help me. I am [AGE] years old and don't relate with these people here. They are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) assistance for residents' requiring staff assistance to complete ADLs for 2 of 18 residents (R54, R32) reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R54's current care plan showed R54 required the assistance of 1-2 staff for toileting and bathing related to his diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with right arm and right leg deficits. The care plan showed R54 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. On August 14, 2023, at 9:44 AM, R54's call light was on. R54's call light was answered by V4 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and V5 CNA. R54 stated, I need to get cleaned up. R54 was in bed, dressed in a soiled shirt and soiled incontinence brief. R54's hair was greasy and not combed. V4 and V5 began providing cares to R54. R54's incontinence brief was removed. R54's brief contained a large amount of urine and mushy brown stool. Stool was noted leaking out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure interventions to promote healing were in place to a non-pressure wound for 1 of 18 residents (R25) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 18. The findings include: R25's admission Record showed R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, obesity, lower extremity edema, and a non-pressure, chronic ulcer of her left heel and midfoot, with necrosis of bone. R25's Wound Evaluation Summary dated July 28, 2023, showed R25's left heel (diabetic) wound measured 1.0 cm (centimeters) x 0.3 cm x 0.7 cm. The summary showed R25 was to wear a pressure relieving boot on her left heel with recommendations of off-loading her left heel wound as much as possible. R25's Wound Evaluation Summary dated August 11, 2023, showed R25's left heel wound measured 0.4 cm x 0.4 cm x 2.2 cm. On August 14, 2023, at 10:30 AM, R25 was seated in a wheelchair in her room. An elastic wrap dressing was noted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility to prevent a decline in range of motion for 1 of 6 (R17) residents reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 8/14/2023 at 11:15AM, R17 was observed lying in bed. R17 had expressive aphagia when interviewed. R17 appeared to have decreased range of motion to her right side as she did not move her right leg or right arm. R17 did move her left arm and leg without difficulty. On 8/15/2023 at 10:20AM, V16 Restorative Registered Nurse said residents not in physical therapy receive restorative services. V16 said all residents receiving restorative services should be getting restorative services three times per day. V16 said R17 was receiving passive and active range of motion as part of her restorative services three times per day. V16 said R17's documentation of active and passive range of motion does not show R17 was receiving range of motion 3 times per day. On 8/15/2023 at 2:56PM, V15 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)/…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to transfer a resident safely. This applies to 1 of 18 residents (R69) reviewed for safety in the sample of 18. The findings include: R69's incident report dated January 16, 2023, shows, Witnessed fall: Resident: R69. Incident location: Resident's room. Incident Description: Nursing Description: This RN (V21 Registered Nurse) was notified by CNA (V12 Certified Nursing Assistant) that resident fell while being transferred to her bed. Went to check the resident in her room and found her on the floor lying on her back. According to the CNA, she was transferring her when the resident lost her balance and fell hitting her back and head on the floor. On August 16, 2023, at 12:28 AM, V12 CNA stated, at the time of R69's fall she was transferring with a slide board. V12 was using the slideboard by herself to transfer R69 to bed. She (R69) lost her balance and fell backwards and hit her head. She stated, R69 is a 2 person assist with transfers. I thought I could do…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with an outpatient dialysis center for 1 of 1 resident (R31) reviewed for dialysis services in the sample of 18. The findings include: R31's admission Record showed R31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including fluid overload and end stage renal disease which required renal dialysis. R31's care plan dated April 8, 2023, showed R31 received hemodialysis every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, at an outpatient dialysis center. On August 14, 2023, at 12:27 PM, R31 was not in her room or anywhere in the facility. V7 Registered Nurse (RN) stated R31 was out of the facility, at dialysis. When V7 RN was asked for any ongoing dialysis communication records or documentation for R31, between the facility and the outpatient dialysis center, R31 stated, We don't have any records. On August 15, 2023, at 7:55 AM, R31 was seated in her room eating breakfast. V7 RN was passing medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received food that accommodated their food preferences and intolerances for 2 of 18 residents (R228, R26) reviewed for food preferences/intolerances in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R228's admission Record showed R228 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, morbid obesity, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. On August 14, 2023, R228 was seated in a wheelchair in her room. R228 stated, I have been here a little over a week. I came from the hospital. I was diagnosed with heart failure. My issue here is the food. I am supposed to have a lower sodium diet. They can't seem to get my diet right. Shortly after I was admitted , I met with (V3 Kitchen Manager). We went over the foods I don't like and the foods I really shouldn't have. They put gravy on everything. I hate gravy. I eat in my room. My breakfast should be here soon. On August 14, 2023, at 9:15 AM, a breakfast…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated in a dignified manner for one of one resident (R178) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 19. The findings include: R178's face sheet printed 8/4/22 showed diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes mellitus, alcohol use unspecified with alcohol induced persisting amnestic disorder, alcohol dependence in remission, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, and repeated falls. R178's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed severe cognitive impairment and memory problems. The same assessment showed extensive staff assistance needed for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and hygiene. On 8/2/22 at 1:00 PM, R178 was lying in bed wearing a night gown. The gown was pulled up to his chest and his bare groin area was completely exposed. R178 was fully visible from the room doorway. R178 was calling for help and his right leg was hanging out of the bed. At 1:02 PM, V17 (CNA-Certified Nurse Aide) walked down…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to shower a resident two times a week. This applies to one of three residents (R228) reviewed for activity of daily living (ADL)'s in the sample of 19. The findings include: The facility face sheet shows R228 has diagnosis to include Type 2 diabetes, chronic pulmonary disease, and schizoaffective disorder. The facility assessment dated [DATE] for R228 shows moderate cognitive impairment and extensive assist of 2 staff for ADL care. On 8/3/2022 at 3:10 PM V11 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) said R228 takes a shower just fine for her. On 8/3/2022 at 3:16 PM, V13 CNA said she had never showered R228 before but never heard of her refusing one. On 8/04/22 at 10:15 AM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) said with R228 behaviors giving showers may be difficult, but I expect the staff to try numerous times, try different approaches and always document if a shower cannot be completed and why. The facility shower sheets for the month of July 2022 shows 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to put interventions in place for a resident (R4) with hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs and facial muscles) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 19. The findings include: R4's admission Record provided by the facility on 8/4/22 showed diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting right dominant side, aphasia (loss or ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage), dementia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids), cognitive communication deficit and weakness. R4's Nursing Rehab/Restorative program reviewed from July 5, 2022, through August 2, 2022, showing one dressing/grooming program. The program showed (R4) will maintain hygiene and dressing with set up, verbal cues, and extensive 1 assist on right side. The facility assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent a resident fall, failed to assess a resident after a fall, and failed to transfer residents in a safe manner for two of ten residents (R178, R70) reviewed for safety in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. R178's face sheet printed 8/4/22 showed diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes mellitus, alcohol use unspecified with alcohol induced persisting amnestic disorder, alcohol dependence in remission, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, and repeated falls. R178's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed severe cognitive impairment and memory problems. The same assessment showed extensive staff assistance needed for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and hygiene. R178's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] showed at risk for falls. R178's care plan showed a focus area initiated 7/8/22 related to activities of daily living and an intervention for: TRANSFER-The resident requires mechanical lift hoyer and 2 staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate incontinence care was given and failed to give incontinence care in a manner to prevent cross contamination for a resident with a history of urinary tract infection for 1 of 1 resident (R51) reviewed for incontinence care in a sample of 19. The findings include: R51's electronic face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R51 has diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, urinary tract infection, dementia without behaviors, dementia with behavior, hypertension, and need for assistance with personal care. R51's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/30/22, shows she is severely cognitively impaired. She requires extensive assist of two person with bed mobility, total dependence of two person with transfers, total dependence with toileting with two persons assist, and R51 is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R51's Care Plan printed on 8/4/22 showed R51 is incontinent of bowel, and bladder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to check placement and residuals of a feeding tube prior to starting liquid nutrition for one of two residents (R15) reviewed for feeding tubes in the sample of 19. The findings include: R15's face sheet printed 8/4/22 showed diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral infarction, dysphagia, dementia, encephalopathy, and heart disease. R15's August 2022 physician orders showed an order for enteral feedings (liquid nutrition via gastrostomy tube) one time a day to start at 9 am and run at 60 ml/hr for 21 hours. Orders also included: Check residuals before beginning a feeding and before medication administration. If greater than 100 cc, hold feedings and recheck in one hour. If not resolved, call MD. On 8/3/22 at 8:59 AM, V18 (Registered Nurse) gathered supplies to begin running R15's feeding tube. V18 used a stethoscope and listened to the pushing of water through R15's feeding tube before starting the liquid nutrition. V18 was questioned about what he was doing and stated he was checking the tube for patency.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to remove gloves after providing incontinence care and failed to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) as recommended. This applies to 3 of 4 residents (R22, R70, R56) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. R70's admission Record provided by the facility on 8/4/22 showed diagnoses including altered mental status, cognitive communication deficit, weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility and lack of coordination. The facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R70 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making and required assistance of staff members for bed mobility and toileting. On 8/02/22 at 12:09 PM, R70 was sitting in a geriatric chair in the hallway. R70 said she needs to lay down. V16 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) pulled his surgical mask down to his chin and leaned in towards R70 telling her that she needs to eat first. V16 stood up, saw this surveyor and pulled the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$44,190 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $22,586 — penalty dated 2025-06-23
- $10,542 — penalty dated 2025-02-21
- $11,062 — penalty dated 2025-02-21
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to APERION CARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILVER LAKE INVESTOR GROUP LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 09/01/2019 |
| JEREMIAS, SHRAGA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 33% | since 09/01/2019 |
| FALK, ERICA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| LEMUS, LORENA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| PEDRE, MANNY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| ULBERT, LISA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| FRANKEL, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| APERION CARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/18/2025 |
| SALWAN, MANAV | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/02/2025 |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| BERKOWITZ, DAVID | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/18/2025 |
| MEYSTEL, YOSEF | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/18/2025 |
| 1212 SOUTH SECOND ST., LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/18/2025 |
| APERION CARE EXEC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| APERION CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| DAVID A BERKOWITZ REVOC TR DAVID BERKOWITZ TTEE | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| DECLARATION OF TRUST OF YOSEF MEYSTEL | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145261. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.