No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aperion Care Greenfield

5430 W Us 40, Greenfield, IN 46140 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (317) 894-3301 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (317) 894-3301 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 24% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
740 W Green Meadows Dr Ste 105 · (317) 318-7777 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens1.2 mi
1195 N State St · (317) 462-8923 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2212 W Main St · (317) 318-9328 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.6%11.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.5%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.3%11.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.0%23.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.4%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table65.1%13.6%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.181.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.641.441.80typical

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.80
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.92
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
38.5%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 50.7 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.92 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-30)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-30)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions as care planned for Resident 7's edema, failed to follow the user manual's guidelines for safe operation of a Broda chair for Resident 5, failed to set up a gynecologist appointment for Resident 18, failed to complete neurological checks for Resident 40 after an unwitnessed fall, and failed to monitor, document, and address drooling for Resident 8. The deficient practice affected 5 of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 7 was reviewed on 9/29/2025 at 2:35 p.m. The medical diagnoses included atypical atrial flutter and schizophrenia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/27/2025, indicated Resident 7 was cognitively intact and did not use diuretics. A cardiovascular care plan, initiated 6/9/2024 and last revised 6/9/2025, indicated to monitor for, document, and notify the provider of any edema. An order for a bilateral lower extremity doppler was ordered, on 9/23/2025, with a diagnosis of venous insufficiency.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the narcotic reconciliation records were signed by the on-going nursing staff and the off-going nursing staff at each of three (3) shift changes daily to reflect the accuracy of the narcotic medication counts and the facility did not maintain expired medications within the facility for 1 of 1 resident. These actions had the potential to adversely affect all residents of the facility that receive narcotic medications and 1 of 1 resident who had one expired medication. (Resident 24) Findings include:1. An observation of the narcotic count sheets was conducted with Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 3, on 9-26-25 at 11:55 a.m., for the facility's east medication cart for September, 2025. The form was set up to reflect the unit or hall for the count sheet, with entries to reflect each date for the month, entries to reflect the three shifts, identified as first, second and third shift, as well as entries to reflect the signature or initials of the nursing staff that was leaving the shift, specified as off, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident with putting on a bra, provide a resident with clean clothes and geriatric chair, and transport a resident in a geriatric chair in a dignified manner by pulling them backwards for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident 38, Resident 5 and Resident 24). Findings include: 1. During an observation conducted on 9/25/25 at 12:20 p.m., Resident 38 was sitting in front of the dining room fully dressed. The resident had no bra in place. During an observation conducted on 9/26/25 at 12:10 p.m., Resident 38 was sitting in front of the dining room fully dressed with no bra in place. During an observation conducted on 9/29/25 at 1:18 p.m., Resident 38 was sitting in front of the dining room fully dressed with no bra in place. During an observation conducted on 9/30/25 at 11:25 a.m., Resident 38 was in the dining room in an activity with several other residents. She was fully dressed with no bra in place. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/29/25 at 1:22 p.m., they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately encode a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospice. (Resident 5)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 9/26/2025 at 11:45 a.m. The medical diagnosis included bipolar and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.An Annual MDS assessment, dated 9/5/2025, indicated Resident 5 was not cognitively intact, did not refuse care, had a 6 month or less prognosis, and was on hospice.A nursing progress note, dated 8/28/2025, indicated Resident 5 was discharged from hospice.A census change, dated 8/28/2025, indicated Resident 5's payor source was changed from hospice to Medicaid. During an interview on 9/29/2025 at 1:45 p.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) indicated Resident 5 was discharged from hospice and they were currently trying to get Resident 5 admitted to a new hospice company, but Resident 5 was currently not on hospice care. During an interview on 9/29/2025 at 2:05 p.m., the MDS Coordinator indicated it was the expectation to code to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an intervention after a fall, failed to provide appropriate footwear, and failed to have fall interventions in place as care planned for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident 38 and Resident 24). Findings include: 1. During an observation on 9/25/2025 at 12:20 p.m., Resident 38 had on house slippers with no nonskid soles on her feet while sitting in a regular chair. The resident was assisted into a wheelchair with standby assistance provided. During an observation on 9/26/2025 at 12:10 p.m., Resident 38 was sitting in a wheelchair with slippers on with no nonskid soles. During an observation on 9/29/2025 at 12:46 p.m., Resident 38 was sitting at the dining room table, with slippers on with no nonslip grip. During an observation on 9/30/25 at 11:25 a.m., Resident 38 was in the dining room with house slippers with no nonskid soles. During an interview with Certified Occupational Therapist Assistant (COTA) on 9/29/2025 at 12:36 p.m., they indicated she was not able to find where therapy had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to flush an indwelling catheter ( a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine continuously) with normal saline every shift as ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for catheter care. (Resident 40)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 40 was reviewed on 9/29/2025 at 11:07 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, dementia, and benign prostatic hyperplasia (the prostate gland, located below the bladder in men, enlarges) with lower urinary tract symptoms. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 6/20/25, indicated Resident 40 had an indwelling catheter. A physician's order, dated 2/24/24, indicated to irrigate/flush catheter with 30 cc (milliliters) of normal saline every shift. The September 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed on 9/29/25 at 11:30 a.m. It indicated a physician's order for catheter: irrigate/flush with 30 cc (milliliters) of normal saline every shift. Omissions indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure only medications with appropriate labels were present in 1 of 2 medication carts during 1 of 2 medication cart observations. (Facility) Findings include:On 9-29-25 at 10:04 a.m., an observation of the west hall medication cart was conducted with Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 4. One bottle of Milk of Magnesia, a saline laxative, was observed which had only the manufacturer's label present. There was no labeling present which indicated the resident's full name, physician's name, specific physician instructions for use, prescription number, date of issue, date opened, or name and address of the pharmacy which dispensed the medication. The label appeared to have been torn off. In an interview with QMA 4 at this time, she indicated it appeared as if the label had been torn off the bottle in some manner as a small piece of label-type material was located on the side, but was without any identifying information. The manufacturer's label indicated directions for use which included, but was not limited to,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) timely for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 10/15/24 at 10:14 a.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety and depression. An interview was conducted with Resident B on 10/11/24 at 12:20 p.m. She indicated on Sunday, 10/6/24, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 grabbed her left arm and shook her, telling her 'you don't talk to me like that,' and called her a crazy b along with other names. CNA 3 ran out of the room when one of the nurses came in. CNA 3 was screaming she was never going in that 'damn b's' room again. Resident B reported this to the night shift nurse, who was right outside the door when CNA 3 was still screaming. On 10/11/24 at 1:11 p.m., the Business Office Manager (BOM) provided a copy of an email sent to her from Resident B on Monday, 10/7/24 at 6:14 a.m., with Serious complaint in the subject line. The email indicated CNA 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure trash was contained within the dumpster and lids were closed on the dumpster for 52 of 52 residents in the facility. Findings include: A tour of the kitchen was conducted with the DM (Dietary Manager) on 8/27/24 at 11:15 a.m. During the tour, an observation was made of the outside dumpster area. There were two dumpsters next to each other located near the outside dry storage food shed. Each dumpster had two lids. The left lid of the left dumpster, when facing the dumpsters, was completely opened. There was a clear bag of trash on the ground to the left of the left dumpster. There was a blue glove on the ground to the right of the left dumpster. There were several bags of trash inside of the opened dumpster. An interview was conducted with the DM during observation of the outside dumpster area. She indicated she was unable to reach the dumpster door. On 8/28/24 at 10:04 a.m. and 8/29/24 at 11:28 a.m., the same dumpster lid as reference in the 8/27/24, 11:15 a.m. kitchen tour was observed open again. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fluids were available at the bedside for 7 of 7 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. (Residents 21,19, 30, 43, 41, 31, and 35) Findings include: 1. Resident 21's record, reviewed on 8/28/24 at 2:40 p.m., indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar, and dementia. During an observation and interview on 08/27/24 at 12:34 p.m., Resident 21 indicated no ice water was ever passed. Resident 21 indicated staff used to pass ice water at night, now if they wanted water, they got it themselves. A cup was located at Resident 21's bedside and was less than half full. Fresh ice water had not been passed, thus far, on 8/27/24. During an observation on 08/29/24 at 10:26 a.m., a Styrofoam cup was on the bedside table with 8/28 written on it. Another empty cup was sitting on the bedside table. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated, 7/19/24, indicated Resident 21 was cognitively intact for daily decision making. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents 2, 13, 31, 33, and 45) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 45 was reviewed on 8/28/24 at 12:15 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and major depressive disorder. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from another facility. The 8/1/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. An interview was conducted with Family Member 2 on 8/28/24 at 12:29 p.m. She indicated Resident 45 was transferred to her current facility from another facility. Family Member 2 received a voicemail from the previous facility that Resident 45 was being transferred the following day. By the time Family Member 2 received the voicemail, Resident 45 was already transferred to her current facility. Resident 45 had behaviors daily. She was combative and hallucinated. Another male resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to place soiled linen in bags when transported through the hallway; ensure soiled linen was contained in soiled utility bins located in the hallway of the facility; and ensure PPE (personal protective equipment) was properly discarded after resident care, prior to leaving the room for 2 of 2 soiled utility bins randomly observed; 1 of 1 random observation of soiled linen transportation by staff; and 7 of 7 residents who were or resided in rooms with a roommate who were in EBP (enhanced barrier precautions). (Residents 5, 11, 29, 30, 36, 45, and 150) Findings include: On 8/27/24 at 1:10 p.m., an observation of a soiled linen bin in the hallway was made. There was unbagged, soiled linen hanging out of the bin. The unbagged, soiled linen was piled so high within the bin, that the lid was unable to be closed and was resting on top of the soiled linen. On 8/29/24 at 10:16 a.m., an observation of a soiled linen bin in the hallway near the social services office was made. There was white linen hanging out of the bin,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for 2 of 12 residents reviewed for a clean environment. (Resident 43 and Resident 31) Findings include: 1. Resident 43's clinical record, reviewed on 8/28/24 at 2:47 p.m., indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver, and schizophrenia. During an observation on 8/27/24 at 1:43 p.m., Resident 43's bathroom floor was sticky to walk on, a bedpan, uncovered, with an open bag of adult diapers were laying on the floor, and there was paint peeling off the walls behind the bed frames. During an interview on 8/30/24 at 2:00 p.m., the Executive Director (ED) indicated she was aware of the paint peeling on the wall. The ED indicated the two residents in the room kept moving their beds around and [scuffing] up the paint on the wall. The ED indicated maintenance had been in the room to repaint it several times. 2. Resident 31's clinical record, reviewed on 9/30/24 at 12:46 p.m., indicated diagnoses that included, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation Resident 5's representative was provided with a bed hold policy for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 8/29/24 at 2:34 p.m. The diagnoses included stroke. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/28/24, indicated Resident 5 was cognitively intact. The census flowsheet for Resident 5 indicated a therapeutic leave from 7/22/24 to 7/26/24. During an interview on 8/30/24 at 1:45 p.m., Resident 5 indicated he did not know what a bed hold policy was and did not receive any paperwork prior to going to the hospital in July of 2024. During an interview on 8/30/24 at 3:20 p.m., the Executive Director indicated the staff could not find the bed hold policy for Resident 5's July hospitalization. The expectation was nursing staff would provide the bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the resident or their representative. A blank copy of the Bed Hold Policy Notice was provided, on 8/30/24 at 3:20 p.m., by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately encode Minimum Data Set (MDS) information for 2 of 19 residents reviewed from MDS accuracy. (Resident 5 and Resident 19) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 8/29/24 at 2:34 p.m. The diagnoses included bipolar disorder. An admission MDS assessment, dated 2/1/24, indicated that Resident 5 did not have a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level II. A PASARR Level II, dated 6/21/19, indicated Resident 5 had a serious mental illness but did not need specialized services. During an interview on 8/30/24 at 11:45 a.m., the Social Services Director indicated Resident 5 had a serious mental illness and the most current Level II was the one dated 6/21/19. 2. The clinical record for Resident 19 was reviewed on 8/30/2024 at 1:30 p.m. The medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 7/26/24, indicated Resident 19 did not have a prognosis of six months or less but received hospice services. A hospice care plan, revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 11 had a completed Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) prior to admission to the facility for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 11 was reviewed on 8/30/24 at 12:15 p.m. The diagnoses included schizophrenia. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/1/24, indicated Resident 11 did not have a PASARR Level II. Per the Indiana State Department of Family and Social Services Administration, all applicants to Medicaid-certified nursing facilities in Indiana are entered in the state's web-based PASARR system, and a Level I screen is completed to initiate the PASARR process. If indicated, a PASARR Level II evaluation is performed to identify the specialized needs of individuals with mental illness (MI), intellectual or developmental disability ID/DD, or both (MI/ID/DD). A PASARR Level I for Resident 11, dated 1/24/19, indicated that Resident 11 needed an on-site Level II review. During an interview on 8/30/24 at 12:55 p.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to hold regularly scheduled care plan meetings for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for care planning. (Resident 45) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 45 was reviewed on 8/28/24 at 12:15 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and major depressive disorder. She was admitted to the facility, on 11/6/23, from another facility. The 11/6/23 nursing note read, Resident is a new admit from [name of previous facility,] came to the facility via facility van. Resident is alert to name but confused with place where she is and time of day . The 8/1/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. An interview was conducted with Family Member 2 on 8/28/24 at 12:29 p.m. She indicated Resident 45 was transferred to her current facility from another facility. Family Member 2 received a voicemail from the previous facility that Resident 45 was being transferred the following day. By the time Family Member 2 received the voicemail, Resident 45 was already…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow scheduled activities calendar or provide outside activities for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for activities. (Resident 34, Resident 41, and Resident 35). Findings include: 1. Resident 35's record, reviewed on 8/28/24 at 2:43 p.m., indicated Resident 35 had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, fibromyalgia, type 2 diabetes, alcoholic cirrhosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and alcohol abuse. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident 35, dated 8/20/24, indicated he was cognitively intact for daily decision making. During an interview on 8/27/24 at 1:16 p.m., Resident 35 indicated that the activities director did not offer a variety of activities. We were supposed to play cards one day, which it was on the activities calendar, but no one had any cards, so we couldn't play. Resident 35 had requested to go on outings with the facility, but the facility told him no, because they do not have enough…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to date a dry dressing to a skin impairment (Resident 1) and failed to complete skin assessment as care planned (Resident 34) for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for skin impairments. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 1 was revied on 8/30/24 at 1:50 p.m. The medical diagnoses included schizophrenia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 8/15/24, indicated that Resident 1 was cognitively impaired. Resident 1 needed minimal to substantial assistance for activities of daily living and was at risk for developing skin alternations. A nursing assessment, dated 8/20/24, indicated that Resident 1 was at high risk of skin alternations. A wound evaluation, dated 8/28/24, indicated Resident 1 had a non-pressure wound to the scalp with undetermined thickness from a fall. Measurements for the wound were 3 centimeters (cm) x 2 cm x Not Measurable. A skin care plan, revised 8/28/24, indicated Resident 1 had an abrasion to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure optometry services were provided timely to a resident who consented to receive optometry services for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for vision or hearing services. (Resident 34) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 34 was reviewed on 8/28/24 at 1:00 p.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, major depressive disorder, and hypertension. He was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The 2/9/22 ancillary services care plan, revised 7/15/24, indicated he consented to receive optometry services through the facility's optometry provider with interventions for him to be seen by the appropriate provider to ensure any issue was resolved. The 10/30/22 physician's order indicated he may be seen by the optometrist, as needed. The 8/12/24 Ancillary Services Assessment form indicated Resident 34 needed assistance with corrective lenses. The 8/13/24 Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to complete quarterly smoking assessments for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for smoking safety. (Resident 23) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 23 was reviewed on 8/29/24 at 2:00 p.m. The diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. An Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 7/30/24, indicated Resident 23 was cognitively intact and utilized tobacco products. A smoking care plan, revised 12/5/23, indicated Resident 23 was a cigarette smoker with an intervention of smoking assessment upon admission, quarterly and as needed. During an interview on 8/30/24 at 2:15 p.m., the Executive Director indicated the staff could not locate the quarterly smoking assessment for Resident 23 for the last year. Activities and social services were to split the duty of completing smoking assessments. A policy entitled, Smoking Safety, was provided by the Social Service Director on 8/30/24 at 8:40 a.m. The policy indicated smoking assessment will be completed at the time of admission, quarterly, and as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based in interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to supervise a dependent resident with administration of an aerosol generating procedure for 1 of 1 reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 30) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 30 was reviewed on 8/30/24 at 11:05 a.m. The diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease. An Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 7/26/24, indicated Resident 30 was cognitively impaired. Resident 30 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. A respiratory care plan, revised 8/19/24, indicated Resident 30 had altered respiratory status related to a diagnosis of asthma with an intervention of administer medications as ordered. A physician order, dated 6/19/24, indicated to administer an aerosolized medication to Resident 30 every six hours. During an observation on 8/27/24 at 1:46 p.m., Resident 30 was sitting in a wheelchair in the resident's room. A nebulizer was running with the tubing detached from the face mask and the mask was placed under Resident 30's chin. During an observation and interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication storage rooms did not contain expired supplies for 2 of 2 medication rooms observed. (Facility) Findings include: An observation conducted of Medication Storage room [ROOM NUMBER], on [DATE] at 9:40 a.m., indicated a urinary catheter with expiration of 2022 and a box of tuberculin syringes with expiration of 2023. An observation conducted of Medication Storage room [ROOM NUMBER] with Registered Nurse (RN) 12, on [DATE] at 9:45 a.m., indicated a box of tuberculin safety syringes expired, on [DATE], and six safety syringes with an expiration date of [DATE]. RN 12 indicated there was a supply room with all needed medical supplies and the medication storage rooms would consist of medical supplies needed for the daily tasks. It was the nurses' responsibility to check the medication storage rooms to ensure the supply items were not expired. A policy titled Medication Storage, revised [DATE], was provided by the Executive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 19 had a routine lab drawn per physician order for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for laboratory services. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 19 was reviewed on 8/30/24 at 1:30 p.m. The medical diagnoses included hypothyroidism. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 7/26/24, indicated Resident 19 was cognitively impaired. A physician order, dated 5/23/24, indicated routine labs every six months to review Resident 19's thyroid levels. A nursing progress note, dated 5/23/24, indicated lab was unable to obtain blood for the routine tests and Will try next lab day . During an interview, on 8/30/24 at 2:15 p.m., the Executive Director indicated that the facility could not find where the labs were obtained for Resident 11's thyroid levels in May of 2024. The thyroid level lab was missed in May 2024. The nursing staff was responsible for obtaining labs per physician order. A policy entitled, Physician Notification of Laboratory/Radiology/Diagnostic Results, was provided by the Social Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided timely to a resident with no bottom dentures for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dental status and services. (Resident 34) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 34 was reviewed on 8/28/24 at 1:00 p.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, major depressive disorder, and hypertension. He was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The 2/25/22 ancillary services consent form indicated Resident 34 consented to receiving dental services in the facility. The 2/9/22 dentures care plan, revised 7/15/24, indicated he wore upper dentures with an intervention to refer to the dentist routinely and as needed. The 10/30/22 physician's order indicated he may be seen by the dentist, as needed. The 8/12/24 Ancillary Services Assessment form indicated Resident 34 needed assistance with dental or dentures. The 8/13/24 Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic was appropriate for the treatment of a urinary tract infection (UTI) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for antibiotic therapy. (Resident 45) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 45 was reviewed on 8/30/24 at 11:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, psychotic disorder, and recurrent UTIs. A progress note, dated 7/9/24 at 4:31 a.m., indicated a urine specimen was obtained for a urinalysis with culture and sensitivity (a diagnostic test to identify and quantify the microorganisms present in a urine sample and determine their sensitivity to various antibiotics). A physician note, dated 7/10/24, indicated a possible concern for a UTI. The urine culture was pending, and if the results were not available (on 7/10/24), the plan was to start Macrobid 100 milligrams twice daily for 7 days. A care plan, initiated 7/11/24, indicated Resident 45 had a UTI. The interventions included, but were not limited to, administer antibiotic therapy as prescribed and monitor laboratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a dignity bag to cover a catheter. This affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for catheters. (Resident 13) Findings include: On 6/21/23, at 11:57 a.m., Resident 13 was observed sitting in a specialty chair, and the catheter bag was uncovered and hung from the underneath of the chair. During an observation, on 6/22/23, at 12:45 p.m., with the ADON, Resident 13's uncovered catheter bag hung from the side of her bed that faced the door. On 6/26/23, at 12:28 p.m., Resident 13 was seated in her specialty chair in the dining room and her catheter was uncovered and attached to the underneath of the chair. Resident 13's record was reviewed, on 6/22/23, at 10:44 a.m. The record indicated Resident 13 had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, high blood pressure, and anxiety. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 5/8/23, indicated Resident 13 was cognitively intact, had an indwelling catheter, and did not walk. Resident 13 had physician's orders for a foley catheter, with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a grievance form to include the date of resident and/or responsible party notification of the resolution of a grievance and to list the disposition of the grievance for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for the grievance process. (Resident 22) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 22 was reviewed on 6/26/2023 at 1:33 p.m. The medical diagnosis included quadriplegia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated for 4/11/2023, indicated that Resident 22 was cognitively intact. A grievance form for Resident 22, dated for 6/20/2022, indicated that Resident 22 stated a staff member broke his tablet. The form did not indicate who the grievance was received by, department to resolve the issues, actions taken to resolve the outcome, date resolved, resolved by or date of the administrator's signature. An interview with Resident 22 on 6/26/2023 at 2:30 p.m. indicated he still did not know the resolution of the grievance for from June 2022. He stated a staff member had broken his tablet last year and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement pressure relieving boots as ordered by the physician for a resident with a pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer (Resident 12). Finding include: During an observation on 6/21/23 at 10:42 a.m., Resident 12 was laying in bed with heels/feet laying on the bed. The resident had pressure relieving boots laying in a chair in across his room. During an interview with the Director Of Nursing (DON) on 6/26/23 at 1:35 p.m., indicated the nurse and CNA's were responsible to ensure Resident 12 had his pressure relieving boots in place. Review of the record of Resident 12 on 6/27/23 at 11:30 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteoarthritis, weakness, diabetes and dementia. The physician recapitulation for Resident 12, dated June 2023, indicated the resident was to wear bilateral pressure relieving boots at all times every shift for healing (5/18/23). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident 12, dated 5/24/23, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a Foley catheter in a manner to prevent Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) by keeping it from being in contact with the floor for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for catheter (Resident 12). Finding include: During an observation on 6/21/23 at 10:40 a.m., Resident 12 was laying in bed. The resident's urinary Foley catheter was laying on the floor at the foot of his bed with no dignity bag. During an interview with the Director Of Nursing (DON) on 6/27/23 at 1:35 p.m., indicated the CNA's and Nurses were responsible to ensure Resident 12's catheter was in a dignity bag and not laying on the floor. Review of the record of Resident 12 on 6/27/23 at 11:30 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, history of Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). The plan of care for Resident 12, dated 1/5/23, indicated the resident was at risk to develop a UTI related to having a history of UTI's and anchored Foley catheter. The plan of care of Resident 12, dated 1/5/23, indicated the resident had a Foley…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was utilized for at least 8 hours a day on 1/14/23, 1/28/23, 2/25/23, 3/25/23, 6/4/23, and 6/18/23, upon review on the daily schedules for June of 2023 and the Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data Report for the quarter of January 1, 2023, to March 31, 2023. Findings include: Upon review of the Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data Report, dated January 1, 2023, to March 31, 2023, indicated there were no RN hours for 1/14/23, 1/28/23, 2/25/23, and 3/25/23. Upon review of the daily schedules for June of 2023, the following days were noted without RN hours or partial hours: 6/4/23- no RN hours & 6/18/23- only 5.5 hours. An interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 6/22/23 at 2:35 p.m., indicated there was no RN coverage on the dates of 1/14/23, 1/28/23, 2/25/23, and 3/25/23. On 6/18/23, the DON indicated she came in at 12:30 p.m. and stayed until 6:00 p.m. 3.1-17(b)(3)

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to APERION CARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 2 of 51.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aperion Care Arbors Michigan CityMichigan City, IN 1 of 5Aperion Care DemotteDemotte, IN 1 of 5Aperion Care DoltonDolton, IL 1 of 5Aperion Care Forest ParkForest Park, IL 1 of 5Aperion Care HanoverHanover, IN 1 of 5Aperion Care InternationalChicago, IL 1 of 5Aperion Care KokomoKokomo, IN 1 of 5Aperion Care LakeshoreChicago, IL 1 of 5Aperion Care LincolnEvansville, IN 1 of 5Aperion Care MidlothianMidlothian, IL 1 of 5Aperion Care MonroeBloomington, IN 1 of 5Aperion Care Oak LawnOak Lawn, IL 1 of 5Aperion Care Tolleston ParkGary, IN 1 of 5Aperion Care VincennesVincennes, IN 1 of 5Aperion Care WesleyChicago, IL 1 of 5Aperion Care WilmingtonWilmington, IL 1 of 5Arcadia Care MortonMorton, IL 2 of 5Alta Rehab At FairmontChicago, IL 2 of 5Alta Rehab At Oak BrookOak Brook, IL 2 of 5Aperion Care Chicago HeightsChicago Heights, IL 2 of 5Aperion Care DekalbDekalb, IL 2 of 5Aperion Care Marion LLCMarion, IN 2 of 5Aperion Care PeruPeru, IN 2 of 5Aperion Care West ChicagoWest Chicago, IL 2 of 5Park Ridge Healthcare CenterPark Ridge, IL 3 of 5Aperion Care BurbankBurbank, IL 3 of 5Aperion Care ElginElgin, IL 3 of 5Aperion Care WestchesterWestchester, IL 5 of 5Alta Rehab At WaucondaWauconda, IL 5 of 5Aperion Care Fox RiverElgin, IL 5 of 5Aperion Care NilesNiles, IL 5 of 5Aperion Care SummerfieldCloverdale, IN

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DAVIESS COUNTY HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/01/2017
ADAMS, JENNIFERIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/01/2024
ROSSELOT, CARLAIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/01/2024
STEINER, DERONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2017
CONROY, TRACYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2017
RODEWALD, AMANDAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2017
APERION CARE GREENFIELD, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
APERION CARE INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
BERKOWITZ, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
GOLDFARB, BRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
HOFFMAN, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
MEYSTEL, JAYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
MEYSTEL, YOSEFIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
SPECTOR, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
TUROFSKY, STEVENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
ULBERT, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense24% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 90%Medicare 3%Other / private 8%

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$324per resident / day
operating cost
$9,843per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$316per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155254. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next