Aperion Care Demotte
10352 N 600 E County Line Rd, Demotte, IN 46310 · For profit - Corporation · 93 certified beds · (219) 345-5211 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Feb 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.6% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.7% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 48.9% | 25.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.9% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.5% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.9% | 23.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.1% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.2% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.4% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 33.7% | 13.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 64.5% | 79.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.8% | 22.2% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.6% | 10.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.94 | 1.61 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.37 | 1.44 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.5%CMS range 40.2–65.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.9%CMS range 5.9–14.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 28.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 61.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.5–12.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 84.0 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.64 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.45 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.78 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and in place for urinary incontinence care for 1 of 7 resident care plans reviewed. (Resident F)Finding includes:Resident F's record was reviewed on 3/17/26 at 12:01 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus.An ADL Care Plan, dated 2/15/26, indicated a deficit in activities of daily living. The toilet hygiene section indicated the resident's usual performance was not documented. There was no intervention of how much care the resident required.A Care Plan, dated 2/15/26, indicated there was a potential of impairment of the the skin integrity related to incontinence. There were no interventions that indicated what care should be done for the incontinence.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/18/26, indicated the resident was dependent for toileting and was frequently incontinent of the bowel and bladder.During an interview on 3/17/26 at 12:08 p.m., the MDS Coordinator indicated she needed to tighten up the Care Plans.During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance for activities of daily living (ADL's) received bathing/showers as scheduled for 3 of 3 residents who required assistance for ADL's. (Residents B, C, and D)Findings include:1. Resident B's closed record was reviewed on 3/16/26 at 1:19 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fractures of the right and left lower extremities.A Care Plan, dated 12/11/25, indicated a deficit in ADL self care and was dependent on staff for bathing.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/16/25, indicated he was dependent on staff for bathing.The Plan of Care indicated the resident's preference for bathing was on day shift on Wednesdays and Saturdays.The Shower Sheets and Task forms, dated 1/2026, indicated bathing had not occurred on 1/3/26. 2. Resident C's record was reviewed on 3/17/26 at 8:37 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, seizures and bipolar.An Annual MDS assessment, dated 3/6/26, indicated moderate assistance was required for bathing.A Care Plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly, with appropriate labeling and not expired, for 2 of 2 medication carts observed and in 2 resident rooms. (ACU Cart, [NAME] Hall Cart, room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]) Findings include:1. On [DATE] at 10:24 a.m., the following was observed on the ACU Cart with RN 2.- A Basaglar KwikPen (insulin) was opened with no open date written on the pen. During an interview, RN 2 indicated she had used the insulin pen that day. She was unsure when it was opened, and staff should have written the open date on the insulin pen. 2. On [DATE] at 10:35 a.m., the following was observed on the [NAME] Hall Cart with LPN 1.- Lantus (insulin) vial was opened with no open date written on the vial or the box. During an interview, LPN 1 indicated she was unaware when the insulin vial had been opened. The staff should have written the open date on the insulin vial. 3. During random observations on [DATE] at 11:19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity related to lack of dignity bag on a urine collection bag, wearing a hospital gown during the day, and not being fully dressed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident 74)Finding includes:During random observations on 9/2/25 at 11:41 a.m., 9/3/25 at 10:41 a.m., 9/4/25 at 7:13 a.m., and 9/5/25 at 10:51 a.m., Resident 74 was observed resting in bed. The urine collection bag from her Foley catheter (a tube that drains the bladder) was visible from the hallway. There was no dignity bag in place. On 9/3/25 at 10:42 a.m. and 9/8/25 at 10:06 a.m., the resident was observed wearing a hospital gown.On 9/5/25 at 10:51 a.m. and 11:29 a.m., the resident was observed from the hallway. She was in bed, wearing only a shirt and disposable brief. Her brief was pulled down and her bare skin was exposed. Several staff members were observed walking past the resident's room.The record for Resident 74 was reviewed on 9/4/25 at 2:13 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had the right to choose what time of day she received a shower for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for choices. (Resident 18)Finding includes:During an interview on 9/3/25 at 10:34 a.m., Resident 18 indicated she took a shower twice a week whenever the staff had time to give her one. The staff would have her take showers at nighttime. She had told them on multiple occasions that she preferred not to take a shower at night and preferred to take them in the morning. She did not like to go to bed with wet hair. Staff would tell her that was her scheduled time to take a shower but never asked her preference or when she wanted to shower. Record review for Resident 18 was completed on 9/8/25 at 1:22 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, hypertension, Parkinson's disease, and depression. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/3/25, indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was indication for use and interventions were attempted prior to administering a PRN (as needed) antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 90)Finding includes:Record review for Resident 90 was completed on 9/4/25 at 8:49 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, alcohol dependence with induced psychotic disorders with delusions, dementia, and hypertension. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].A Care Plan, dated 8/29/25, indicated the resident had potential for adverse side effects related to medication use of an antipsychotic. An intervention included to administer the medications per order and to observe for side effects.A Physician's Order, dated 8/28/25, indicated to administer quetiapine fumarate (antipsychotic medication) 25 mg, give 1/2 a tablet every 24 hours as needed for agitation.A Fall Initial Occurrence Note, dated 8/28/25 at 9:45 p.m., indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to successfully complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in timely manner for 1 of 24 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. (Resident 6) Finding includes: Closed record review for Resident 6 was completed on 9/9/25 at 10:46 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 5/14/25.A Nurses Note, dated 5/14/25 at 2:05 p.m., indicated the resident was discharged to another healthcare facility.There was a lack of documentation to indicate a discharge MDS assessment had been completed on the resident after his discharge from the facility. During an interview on 9/9/25 at 11:15 a.m., the MDS Coordinator indicated she had worked on the resident's discharge from the facility but had forgotten to complete the MDS discharge assessment.3.1-31(d)(1)
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately completed related to an anticoagulant medication and insulin administered for 2 of 24 MDS assessments reviewed. (Residents 24 and 8) Findings include:1. Record review for Resident 24 was completed on 9/9/25 at 9:55 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anemia, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. The Significant Change MDS assessment, dated 7/2/25, indicated the resident had received an anticoagulant medication during the assessment period. There was a lack of documentation of a Physician's Order for an anticoagulant medication or that the resident had received an anticoagulant medication during the assessment period. 2. Record review for Resident 8 was completed on 9/9/25 at 10:06 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, hypertension, and dementia. The Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 7/23/25, indicated the resident had received 7 days of insulin injections during the assessment period. There was a lack of documentation of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess and document a wound for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. (Resident 32)Finding includes:During a random observation on 9/2/25 at 11:15 a.m., a dressing was observed on Resident 32's right leg stump. At that time, the resident indicated the surgical incision from her leg amputation had previously healed, but part had re-opened.The resident's record was reviewed on 9/4/25 at 12:11 p.m. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, bleeding stomach ulcer, stroke, and right leg amputation. The 8/14/25 Medicare-5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making, required maximum assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) and moderate assistance with transfers. An 8/29/25 Physician's Office Visit Note indicated the orthopedic doctor saw the resident in his office. He consulted infectious disease as well as wound care for the resident's right stump infection. The record lacked any wound assessments since 8/21/25.During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's electronic smoking materials were locked up and fall precautions were in place for a resident with a history of falls for 2 of 11 residents reviewed for accidents. (Residents 58 and 82)Findings include:1. On 9/3/25 at 2:06 p.m., Resident 58 was observed lying in bed in his room. There were 2 electronic cigarette vapes observed on his bedside table. The resident's daughter was in the room and indicated his smoking vapes were supposed to be locked up. On 9/4/25 at 3:05 p.m., Resident 58 was observed propelling himself in his wheelchair out of his room. There were 2 electronic cigarette vapes observed on his bedside table. CNA 1 indicated the resident was going out to smoke and she was unsure if his smoking vapes were supposed to be locked up or not and she had not given the resident his smoking vapes. Record review for Resident 58 was completed on 9/4/25 at 2:20 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food consumption logs were complete for residents with a history of weight loss for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 20)Finding includes:The record for Resident 20 was reviewed on 9/3/25 at 3:49 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart disease, pressure ulcer of buttock, and dementia.The 8/18/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment, required maximal assistance with ADLs and transfers, and had a weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or 10% or more in last 6 months. The resident's record lacked documentation of 3 meal intakes per day on 8/13/25, 8/14/25, 8/16/25, 8/17/25, 8/18/25, 8/19/25, 8/20/25, 8/23/25, 8/25/25, 8/28/25, 8/29/25, 9/1/25, and 9/2/25.A care plan, revised 8/13/25, indicated the resident was at risk for fluctuations in weight. Interventions included monitoring and recording the resident's intake each shift.During an interview on 9/4/25 at 11:50 a.m., the MDS Coordinator indicated the resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for 1 of 11 residents observed during medication pass. Two errors were observed during 26 opportunities for errors during medication administration. This resulted in a medication error rate of 7.69%. (Resident 17) Finding includes:On 9/5/25 at 3:11 p.m., RN 1 was observed preparing Resident 17's medications to be administered. The nurse popped out 1 Flomax 0.4 mg (milligrams) capsule (urinary medication) and 1 senna 8.6 mg (stimulant laxative) pill into a cup. She then proceeded to place the medications into a clear plastic bag and crushed the medications. She poured the crushed medications into a cup and put a spoonful of pudding on top of the medications and stirred. The capsule was not crushed and was flattened out but still intact. The nurse indicated she was finished and ready to administer the resident's medications. The nurse locked her medication cart and proceeded to go into the resident's room. The nurse was then asked to stop and not to administer the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented related to duplicate medications on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 10)Findings include:The record for Resident 10 was reviewed on 9/8/25 at 10:23 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and diabetes.The 8/5/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision or touching assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) and transfers.The September 2025 MAR indicated, . Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% [a lubricating eye drop] . Instill 1 drop in both eyes one time a day. and .Refresh Tears Solution (Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium) Instill 1 drop in both eyes one time a day. Both entries were signed out as given each morning. During an interview on 9/8/25 at 11:03 a.m., LPN 1 indicated the resident received one drop to each eye every morning, and that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented related to a dirty bedside table used for wound care supplies and lack of hand hygiene with glove changes during wound care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 20)Finding includes:Wound care for Resident 20 was observed on 9/4/25 at 7:10 a.m. After removing the old dressing, the Wound Nurse took gauze that was placed directly on a bedside table, soaked it in Dakin's solution (a wound cleanser), and used it to cleanse the open wound on the resident's buttock. There was no barrier, and the table was visibly dirty. The Wound Care Physician assessed and measured the wound, removed his gloves, and put on gloves he got from his pocket. He debrided the wound, again removed his gloves and put on gloves from his pocket, and cleansed inside the open wound with gauze from the table. He did not perform hand hygiene after removing his gloves. During an interview on 9/4/25 at 7:40 a.m., the Wound Nurse indicated she told someone to clean the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of resident property related to drug diversions of residents' narcotic pain medications (hydrocodone and oxycodone) for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property. (Residents B, F, and G) The deficient practice was corrected on 1/3/25, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Finding includes: A Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) reported incident indicated on 12/27/24 at 10:01 a.m., it was reported to the Assistant Director of Nursing and the Administrator that the facility was unable to account for a Resident B's narcotic pain medication or oxycodone 15 mg (milligrams). A 5-Day Follow-up to the reported incident, dated 1/3/25, indicated a registered nurse had admitted to taking Resident B's oxycodone 15 mg. The investigation of the incident, undated and completed by the RN Nurse Consultant, indicated all residents' medications and count sheets were reviewed. There were discrepancies for the narcotic pain medications for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a 5-Day follow up to a reported incident of misappropriation to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) contained thorough and complete information from the facility's investigation of the incident, for 1 of 1 reported incident reviewed. Finding includes: A Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) reported incident indicated on 12/27/24 at 10:01 a.m., it was reported to the Assistant Director of Nursing and the Administrator, the facility was unable to account for a Resident B's narcotic pain medication or oxycodone 15 mg (milligrams). The Staff involved were RN 3 and RN 4. A 5-Day follow-up to the reported incident, dated 1/3/25, indicated the drug diversion was substantiated due to RN 4 admission of taking the oxycodone. Cross reference F602. The 5-day follow up lacked information from the investigation that indicated two other residents were found to have missing narcotic medication, how many narcotics were unaccounted for, and that RN 3 was not involved in the misappropriation of the medication. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received necessary care and services related to no investigation for the root cause for a resident's multiple skin tears for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care and skin tears. (Resident C) Finding includes: During an observation and interviews on 2/5/25 from 8:45 a.m. to 9:42 a.m., CNA 1 and CNA 2 entered Resident C's room to provide care. The resident was observed to have two dressings on the right arm and two dressings on the back of her right hand. CNA 1 indicated the resident had skin tears on her arms. Resident C's record was reviewed on 2/5/25 at 11:46 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia and diabetes mellitus. The resident was receiving hospice care. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/10/24, indicated the resident had short and long term memory problems, was dependent for all activities of daily living, had skin tears present, and received hospice care. The Wound Report indicated a skin tears were identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pressure ulcers were assessed thoroughly and timely, the Physician was notified timely of a decline in a pressure ulcer, and an intervention to prevent pressure ulcers was in place, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident C) Finding includes: During an observation and interviews on 2/5/25 from 8:45 a.m. to 9:42 a.m., CNA 1 and CNA 2 entered Resident C's room to provide care. When the resident was turned to the right side, there was a large dressing on the left hip with copious amount of bloody drainage that was seeping under the dressing onto the pad underneath the resident and a foul odor was present from the dressing. There was a dressing also observed on the sacral area. At 9:24 a.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) entered the room and indicated she was also the Wound Nurse. The ADON indicated she completed wound rounds with the Wound Nurse Practitioner (NP) weekly. Resident C was on hospice and the Wound NP did not see the resident weekly. The ADON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure correct Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was used by staff members (CNA 1 and CNA 2) when providing care to a resident (Resident C) who was in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), for two random observations for infection control. Finding includes: During an observation on 2/5/25 at 8:45 a.m., CNA 1 and CNA 2 entered Resident C's room to provide care. There was a sign on the resident's door which indicated the resident required EBP and there was PPE stored in a container in the hallway. An indwelling urinary catheter was present and CNA 1 indicated the resident had skin tears and pressure ulcers. CNA 1 and CNA 2 wore gloves and no gowns. They were stopped prior to starting care. CNA 1 and CNA 2 indicated they should have a gown on while providing care. During an observation on 2/5/25 at 11:49 a.m., CNA 2 and LPN 5 were at Resident C's bedside and was repositioning the resident in bed. They wore gloves. They were not wearing a gown. LPN 5 indicated EBP PPE should have been worn during care. Cross…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored for 2 of 4 medication carts observed. (ACU Cart, and [NAME] 1 Cart) Findings include: 1. On 9/20/24 at 2:33 p.m., the ACU Medication Cart was observed with Agency QMA 1. There were multiple pills of different sizes and colors that were loose and out of the packages throughout the bottoms of the drawers in the cart. The QMA indicated that was the first day she had worked on the cart. 2. On 9/20/24 at 2:47 p.m., the [NAME] 1 Medication Cart was observed with RN 2. There were multiple pills of different sizes and colors that were loose and out of the packages throughout the bottoms of the drawers in the cart. The RN indicated that nursing was responsible to clean the carts. During an interview on 9/20/24 at 2:45 p.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing indicated the Director of Nursing was usually responsible to make sure the carts were cleaned. 3.1-25(j) 3.1-25(o)
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for self-administration of medications and had a Physician's Order to self-administer medications, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Residents 9 and 32) Findings include: 1. During a medication pass observation on 9/19/24 at 11:12 a.m., LPN 1 was observed preparing Resident 9's medications. The nurse indicated the resident was to have a nebulizer breathing treatment. She poured a plastic vial of ipratropium-albuterol (medication to help control the symptoms of lung disease) 3 ml (milliliters) into a medicine cup attached to an oxygen mask. She then placed the oxygen mask over the resident's face, turned on the treatment machine, and told the resident to take a few deep breaths. She then told the resident she would be back in to remove the breathing treatment in about 10 minutes. The LPN then proceeded to leave the room and walked back to the medication cart to prepare the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident involved in a physical altercation with another resident received psychosocial follow up care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident 136) Finding includes: The closed record for Resident 136 was reviewed on 9/19/24 at 9:30 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to home on 9/8/24. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia, hypertension and depression. He resided on the locked memory care unit. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 8/29/24, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. An IDOH (Indiana Department of Health) Facility Reported Incident, dated 9/5/24, indicated another resident had approached Resident 136 and struck him numerous times. The residents were immediately separated and assessed for injuries. The other resident was sent to the hospital for aggressive behaviors to be evaluated, and Resident 136 was to be monitored for signs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident and/or their Responsible Party were notified in writing related to a transfer to the hospital for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 27) Finding includes: Resident 27's record was reviewed on 9/18/24 at 3:01 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus and elevation of levels of liver transaminase levels (liver enzymes). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/23/24, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. A Nurses' Note, dated 7/12/24 at 6:47 p.m., indicated the Physician was in to see the resident and new orders to send the resident to the hospital were obtained due to elevated liver enzymes. The Responsible Party was notified and report was called to the hospital. The resident was sent with appropriate paperwork. A Physician Order Note, dated 7/12/24 at 6:48 p.m., indicated the resident was seen due to elevated liver enzymes. The resident indicated he had nausea and emesis, but he did not inform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident and/or their Responsible Party were sent the facility's bed-hold and reserve bed payment policy before and upon transfer to the hospital for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 27) Finding includes: Resident 27's record was reviewed on 9/18/24 at 3:01 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus and elevation of levels of liver transaminase levels (liver enzymes). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/23/24, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. A Nurses' Note, dated 7/12/24 at 6:47 p.m., indicated the Physician was in to see the resident and new orders to send the resident to the hospital were obtained due to elevated liver enzymes. The Responsible Party was notified and report was called to the hospital. The resident was sent with appropriate paperwork. A Physician Order Note, dated 7/12/24 at 6:48 p.m., indicated the resident was seen due to elevated liver enzymes. The resident indicated he had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with abnormal lab results received timely intervention for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident 68), medications were given as ordered for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 24 and 55), and skin discolorations were assessed and monitored for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. (Resident 37) Findings include: 1. On 9/18/24 at 9:31 a.m., Resident 68 was observed lying in bed with his eyes closed. Normal Saline 0.9% intravenous fluids were infusing at 100 ml (milliliters) per hour to his left upper arm PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter, intravenous access) line. The record for Resident 68 was reviewed on 9/18/24 at 9:43 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction, chronic kidney disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/30/24, indicated the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received ancillary services to maintain vision and hearing in a timely manner, for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for vision/hearing. (Resident 27) Finding includes: During an interview on 9/16/24 at 10:43 a.m., Resident 27 indicated he could not hear or see and required outside services, however, the facility had not done anything to help him with hearing or vision services at the time. Resident 27's record was reviewed on 9/18/24 at 3:01 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, encephalopathy (brain disease), legal blindness, and hearing loss. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/23/24, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. He had moderate difficulty with the ability to hear and did not have hearing aids. He had highly impaired vision and did not have corrective lenses. A Care Plan, dated 3/25/24, indicated the resident had a behavior problem related to being hard of hearing and yelling out and speaking loudly. A Care Plan, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall precautions were in place for a resident with a history of falls for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 21) Finding includes: On 9/16/24 at 10:23 a.m., Resident 21 was observed seated in her wheelchair near the front Nurse's Station. Observation of her room at that time, indicated there were no non-skid strips to the floor anywhere in her room or bathroom. On 9/18/24 at 9:27 a.m., Resident 21 was assisted by staff to her room and was seated in her wheelchair. There were no non-skid strips observed to the floor anywhere in her room or bathroom. The record for Resident 21 was reviewed on 9/19/24 at 11:05 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with psychotic disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and anxiety disorder. The Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/15/24, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. She had one fall with major injury and one fall with no injury since the prior assessment. A Care Plan, updated 10/23/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary care and treatment related to oxygen not administered as ordered or monitored for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 7) Finding includes: On 9/17/24 at 9:44 a.m., Resident 7 was observed seated in her recliner. There was an oxygen concentrator next to her that was turned on. The oxygen tubing and nasal cannula were lying on the floor. The resident indicated she only used the oxygen at night. On 9/18/24 at 11:53 a.m. the resident was observed seated in her room. The oxygen concentrator was off and the oxygen tubing was in a plastic bag. The resident's record was reviewed on 9/18/24 at 10:25 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute and chronic respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus, schizoaffective disorder and depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 8/15/24, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive deficits, required substantial assistance for transfers and moderate assistance for bed mobility. A Physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for residents who received hemodialysis, related to not monitoring the dialysis access site, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis. (Resident 231) Finding includes: On 9/16/24 at 10:19 a.m., Resident 231 was seated in his wheelchair near the front Nurse's Station. He had his dialysis bag on his lap and indicated he was waiting to leave for dialysis. He went to dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. He had a catheter to his right chest that was used for dialysis. The record for Resident 231 was reviewed on 9/19/24 at 11:05 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/10/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and received hemodialysis services. The resident was hospitalized on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Physician's Order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure abnormal lab results were reported to the Physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident 68). Finding includes: On 9/18/24 at 9:31 a.m., Resident 68 was observed lying in bed with his eyes closed. Normal Saline 0.9% intravenous fluids were infusing at 100 ml (milliliters) per hour to his left upper arm PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter, intravenous access) line. The record for Resident 68 was reviewed on 9/18/24 at 9:43 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction, chronic kidney disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/30/24, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident was hospitalized [DATE] and returned to the facility on 7/15/24. The resident was again hospitalized on [DATE] and returned to the facility on 8/24/24. A Care Plan, updated 3/4/24, indicated the resident was at risk for decreased…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure multiple use equipment was disinfected after use on residents for 1 of 8 residents reviewed during a medication administration observation. (Resident 9 and LPN 1) Finding includes: During a medication pass observation on 9/19/24 at 11:12 a.m., LPN 1 was observed preparing Resident 9's medications. The nurse indicated she had to check the resident's blood pressure prior to giving him his medications. She removed a blood pressure wrist cuff from her medication cart and took it into the resident's room. She then proceeded to apply the blood pressure cuff to the resident's right wrist and turn on the machine. The blood pressure was completed and the LPN removed the blood pressure cuff and returned the blood pressure cuff to the medication cart. The LPN then proceeded to prepare and administer the residen'ts medication before moving onto the next residents. The LPN was not observed to clean the blood pressure cuff before or after applying it to the resident's wrist. During an interview after the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (full code) was initiated as requested by the resident's Responsible Party/Health Care Representative, for a resident (Resident B) who was admitted into the facility on hospice, for 1 of 3 deceased residents who were reviewed for cardiopulmonary resuscitation status. Finding includes: Resident B's record was reviewed on [DATE] at 9:42 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, urinary retention, prostate cancer, severe vascular dementia, acute and subacute stroke, coronary artery disease, and quadriplegia. A family member was listed as his Health Care Representative (HCR). A Hospital Physician's Note, dated [DATE] and signed by Hospital Physician 1, indicated the resident was to be discharged from the hospital on [DATE] with an order for hospice care. A Post Scope of Treatment form, dated [DATE] and signed by the HCR, indicated a request for CPR to be initiated if there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the pneumococcal and influenza immunizations after the resident/Responsible Party had signed a consent for the immunizations, and failed to thoroughly investigate if prior immunizations had been completed, for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Residents C, D, and J). The facility also administered the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations to a resident who had a declination signed by the Responsible Party for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident E) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 3/12/24 at 11:54 a.m., Resident C indicated he was unable to remember if he had been questioned about his immunizations when he was first admitted to the facility. He indicated if he was due for any of the immunizations, he would like to receive them. Resident C's record was reviewed on 3/12/24 at 2:47 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure. The resident's admission date was 1/29/24. The admission Minimum Data (MDS) assessment, dated 2/5/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident D) Finding includes: During an observation on 3/12/24 at 12:05 p.m., Resident D was lying in bed. The mattress he was lying on was a regular mattress without bolsters. The wheelchair was positioned next to his bed. There were no anti-tip bars on the wheelchair. During an observation on 3/12/24 at 5:05 p.m., the resident was lying on the bed. There were no anti-tip bars on the wheelchair next to the bed and no bolsters on the mattress. LPN 1 indicated there were no anti-tip bars on the wheelchair and no bolsters on the mattress. Resident D's record was reviewed on 3/12/24 at 4:24 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus, and stroke. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/20/24, indicated a severely impaired cognitive status, maximum assistance was required for bed mobility and transfers, and had one fall with a non-major injury. A Care Plan, dated 12/5/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was set at the correct flow rate, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen usage. (Resident D) Finding includes: During an observation on 3/12/24 at 12:05 p.m. and 5:05 p.m., Resident D was lying in bed. Oxygen was being administered through a nasal cannula, and the oxygen flow rate was set at 3.5 liters per minute. LPN 1 was interviewed on 3/12/24 at 5:05 p.m., and indicated the oxygen was being administered between 3 and 3.5 liters per minute. She was unsure what the Physician's Order was for the oxygen administration flow rate. Resident D's record was reviewed on 3/12/24 at 4:24 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus, and stroke. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/20/24, indicated a severely impaired cognitive status, maximum assistance was required for bed mobility and transfers, and oxygen was administered. A Care Plan, dated 12/6/23, indicated oxygen therapy was required. Oxygen was to be administered per the Physician's Orders was an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the COVID-19 vaccination and boosters were administered to the residents who signed consents to receive them. They also failed to ensure accurate documentation of when and what COVID-19 immunizations had been given prior to admission into the facility, for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for COVID-19 immunizations. (Residents C and J) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 3/12/24 at 11:54 a.m., Resident C indicated he was unable to remember if he had been questioned about his immunizations when he was first admitted to the facility. He indicated if he was due for any of the immunizations he would like to receive them. Resident C's record was reviewed on 3/12/24 at 2:47 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure. The resident's admission date was 1/29/24. The admission Minimum Data (MDS) assessment, dated 2/5/24, indicated an intact cognitive status. The Immunization Record indicated the COVID-19 booster immunization was refused. The admission Agreement, dated 1/30/24, indicated he received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in form to meet individual needs related to not following a recipe for pureed food or making pureed food the correct consistency. This had the potential to affect all 4 residents who received a pureed diet. Finding includes: On 11/1/23 at 11:10 a.m., [NAME] 1 was observed preparing pureed food. She indicated she was going to puree tacos. There was no recipe out for reference. She measured 5 scoops of taco meat and placed it in the blender and pureed. She then placed the meat in a prepared serving pan and put it on the steam table. The taco meat looked dry and chunky, not smooth. There were no additional ingredients added to the mixture. She indicated it was completed. The Dietary Manager (DM) observed the meat and indicated it was not smooth, it should be creamier. She also indicated it should not be just meat, but the whole taco that was pureed. At 11:40 a.m., the pureed taco mixture was observed. It was creamier and smoother. The [NAME] indicated she had just added liquid to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an inventory record of a resident's property was provided to a resident and/or the resident's representative on admission or discharge from the facility for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for personal property. (Resident B) Finding includes: Record review for Resident B was completed on 10/30/23 at 2:02 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dementia. The resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 9/25/23. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/28/23, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. A Nurse's Note, dated 9/25/23 at 2:30 p.m., indicated the resident's son called and requested his dad be dressed and up in his chair around 4:00 p.m. and then hung up the phone. The last progress note in the resident's record was a Social Service Note, dated 9/26/23 at 10:00 a.m., that indicated she spoke with APS (Adult Protective Services) in regards to inappropriate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were completed quarterly and/or included the family and IDT (interdisciplinary team) members as required for 2 of 19 residents reviewed for care planning. (Residents E and 5) Findings include: 1. Resident E's record was reviewed on 10/31/23 at 9:12 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Diabetes Mellitus and vascular dementia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 7/21/23, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required substantial/ maximum assistance for bed mobility and transfers. There was no documentation a quarterly care plan meeting had been completed since November 2022. Telephone interview on 11/1/23 at 9:46 a.m. with the resident's health care representative, indicated she had not been invited to or attended a care plan meeting in about a year. Prior to that, she had been invited regularly. A copy of the last invitation to the health care representative was provided by the Social Service Director (SSD) and was post marked 10/25/22. Interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received the ADL (activities of daily living) assistance needed related to uncut, dirty fingernails for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Residents D and E) Findings include: 1. On 10/30/23 at 11:29 a.m., Resident D was observed seated in his room. His fingernails were long and some were broken and jagged. On 10/31/23 at 10:28 a.m., the resident was observed seated in his room, his nails were still long and jagged. The resident's record was reviewed on 10/31/23 at 10:17 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteoarthritis of the knee and frequent falls. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/4/23, indicated the resident had significant cognitive impairment and required partial/ moderate assistance for eating, transfers and toileting. Interview with CNA 1 on 10/31/23 at 11:13 a.m., indicated staff did resident fingernail care on Sundays. She was unable to locate documentation the resident had nail care recently, but would complete it today. 2. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment of edema related to compression stockings not in place, a skin discoloration was assessed and monitored, and a Physician's Order was in place for a resident with a back brace for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for edema, 1 of 2 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for positioning and range of motion. (Residents D, 57 and 220) Findings include: 1. On 10/30/23 at 11:29 a.m. and 10/31/23 at 10:28 a.m., Resident D was observed seated in his room. He had on two pair of regular socks and shoes, there were no compression socks worn. The resident's record was reviewed on 10/31/23 at 10:17 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteoarthritis of the knee and frequent falls. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/4/23, indicated the resident had significant cognitive impairment and required partial/ moderate assistance for eating, transfers and toileting. The current Edema Care Plan indicated the resident had edema to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for a resident with a history of falls for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident C) Finding includes: On 10/30/23 at 10:00 a.m. and 10/31/23 at 10:29 a.m., Resident C's bed was observed. It was a standard mattress without bolsters. On 10/31/23 at 11:27 a.m., the resident was seated in the activity room. CNA 1 assisted the resident to a standing position from her wheelchair. There was a cushion in place, but there was not a Dycem (a non slip device for chairs) in place on the chair. The CNA indicated she thought the Dycem was in place, but it was not. The resident's record was reviewed on 10/30/23 at 2:35 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, difficulty walking, and repeated falls. A Progress Note, dated 10/24/23, indicated the resident had a witnessed fall in the bathroom attempting to self transfer. A Progress Note, dated 10/28/23, indicated the resident had an unwitnessed fall and was found lying on the floor next to her bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Physician's Orders were in place for feeding tube maintenance and a feeding bag was changed daily for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for tube feeding. (Resident 119) Finding includes: On 10/29/23 at 9:47 a.m., Resident 119 was observed in bed. He was non-responsive, had a trachea with oxygen flowing and tube feeding connected and running. The bag with the feeding solution was noted to have dried, clumpy solution on the inside sides of the bag and the date had been covered with a black marker. The date underneath the black marker was visible and indicated 10/24/23. On 10/29/23 at 2:40 p.m., the tube feeding was observed with the Nurse Consultant, it was still hanging and running. The Nurse Consultant indicated she could see the date beneath the black marker and she would look into it. The resident's record was reviewed on 10/30/23 at 1:15 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, persistent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-11-03 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to have daily nurse staffing postings. This had the potential to affect all 70 residents residing in the facility. Finding includes: On 10/29/23 at 9:35 a.m., the Nursing Staff Sheet was posted at the front entryway on top of a desk. The sheet was dated October 27, 2023. On 11/2/23 at 1:06 p.m., the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for Quarter 3 2023 (April 1-June 30) was reviewed. It had triggered submitted weekend staffing data was excessively low. The daily Nursing Staff Sheets were reviewed for April 1- June 30, 2023 and October 2 - November 1, 2023. There were no daily sheets for the following days: April 2023 -Saturdays: 4/1, 4/8, 4/15, 4/22, and 4/29/23 -Sundays: 4/2, 4/9, 4/16, 4/23, and 4/30/23 May 2023 -Saturdays: 5/6, 5/13, 5/20, and 5/27/23 -Sundays: 5/7, 5/14, 5/21, and 5/28/23 June 2023 -Saturdays: 6/3, 6/10, and 6/17/23 -Sundays: 6/4, 6/11, and 6/18/23 October 2023 -Saturdays: 10/7, 10/14, 10/21, and 10/28/23 -Sundays: 10/8, 10/15, and 10/22/23 Interview with the Administrator on 10/29/23 at 9:58…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to APERION CARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APERION INDIANA INVESTOR GROUP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 12% | since 05/01/2014 |
| 1219 LIMTED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| 257 LIMTED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| 42170 LIMTED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| FREDERICK S FRANKEL TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| ISLAND CITY EQUITY PARTNERS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| MORRIS ESFORMES 2021 REVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| SAHRA AND DOV SEGAL | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| KODER, MICHELLE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| WIRTENBERG, DELECIA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| WROTSLOVSKTY, SHELDON | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| YOLINSKY, JACK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| JOHNS, MARYLYN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| CLAXTON, RYAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| ULBERT, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| APERION CARE DEMOTTE, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/15/2025 |
| APERION CARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| ATTINGER, JEFFERY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| DEYOUNG, KELLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| TEODORI, KRISTINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| APERION CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2014 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155572. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.