Aperion Care Marion LLC
614 West 14th Street, Marion, IN 46953 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 70 certified beds · (765) 662-3701 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $15,935 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-26)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.9% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 97.5% | 25.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 3.9% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.6% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.1% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 50.9% | 95.4% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.4% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.2% | 23.3% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.7% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 62.7% | 79.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.7% | 22.2% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.7% | 10.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.72 | 1.61 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.41 | 1.44 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
64.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 64.3%CMS range 51.2–73.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 5.8–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 58.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 86.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.4–16.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 60.3 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify the risk for the development of wounds and failed to develop and implement interventions to prevent wounds for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds. (Resident B) This deficient practice resulted in the resident requiring hospitalization and surgical intervention to treat a severely infected diabetic ulcer to their foot.Findings include:An anonymous report submitted to the Indiana Department of Health indicated Resident B had developed a wound to his foot the facility failed to notice and then had blamed the resident of causing it by using nail clippers to cut his skin.Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 2/25/26 at 9:44 a.m.A nurse practitioner progress note, dated 2/16/26, for a follow up related to a urinary tract infection indicated the resident's family member approached the nurse's station demanding that someone examine the resident's left foot. The nurse practitioner and the facility nurse entered the resident's room and noted a wound to the bottom of the resident's left foot. His left forefoot had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-22 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) worked the required hours to manage the Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP), including infection surveillance, staff training, and antibiotic stewardship monitoring to mitigate the risk of the spread of infection. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 62 of 62 residents living in the facility. Findings include:During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 4/16/26 at 3:55 p.m., she indicated she had served as the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP) for the last five years. During an interview with the DON on 4/20/26 at 9:57 a.m., she indicated she was the person in charge of infection prevention. The ADON was her backup, when needed. The ADON was also certified in infection prevention. The ADON worked 30 hours a week. The DON worked 40 hours a week as the DON. She indicated she focused on IP during her regular workday(s) as needed. If she needed to stay over an hour or two here and there, she would. During an interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for residents when steam tables were left on and unattended in the main dining room. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 9 cognitively impaired and independently mobile residents of 62 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:During an observation, on 4/16/26 at 10:30 a.m., a four compartment steam table in the main dining room, between D and E halls, was left unattended and on the high setting. Steam was noted coming from all four compartments. The two chains blocking off the cooking area of the dining room were down, allowing for direct access to both sides of the steam table. During an interview, on 4/16/26 at 10:36 a.m., the Dietary Manager walked into the serving area of the dining room and indicated the chains were down and should be up after each meal service. The steam tables were turned off after meal service, and staff turned them back on about an hour and twenty minutes before each meal service, so they were hot during the meal. Only dietary staff and nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) at the end of Medicare A-covered services for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notification. (Resident 7).Finding includes:On 4/15/26 at 12:37 p.m., the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Notification Review Forms were reviewed and indicated the following:Resident 7 was admitted to Medicare Part A Skilled Services on 11/11/25. The last covered day of Part A services was 1/25/26. The facility/ provider initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A services when benefit days were not exhausted. A NOMNC was not provided since the beneficiary initiated the discharge.The resident transferred to a local area hospital on 1/18/26 and returned to the facility on 1/23/26 under Medicare Part A services.Resident 7 had an Occupational Therapy visit on 1/23/26.A Therapy Payor Verification Form, dated 1/23/26, indicated Resident 7's payor source was Medicare Part A.Resident was discharged from Medicare Part A on 1/25/26.The SNF Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from the use of a chemical restraint related to the use of an antipsychotic medication without clinical indication and without the development of non-pharmacological interventions for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 21)Findings include:During an observation on 4/17/26 at 12:02 p.m., Resident 21 was in his room, asleep in bed. The room was dark and the television was playing. On 4/20/26 at 9:02 a.m., Resident 21 was lying in bed watching television. He indicated he was comfortable at the facility. The staff treated him kindly. Resident 21's clinical record was reviewed on 4/16/26 at 3:37 p.m. Diagnoses included personal history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), major depressive disorder, recurrent, psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to a known physiological condition, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, and dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents and/or their representatives with written notice of transfer/discharge and bed hold policy for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Resident 2 and Resident 70). Findings include: 1. Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed on 4/17/26 at 11:34 a.m. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), chronic kidney disease, and atrial fibrillation (rapid irregular heartbeat).A 12/10/25, quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A progress note, dated 12/14/25 at 9:49 p.m., indicated the resident was sent to the hospital for altered mental status. The resident was difficult to wake up and would not stay awake. He followed commands slowly but returned to sleep. Vital signs were obtained and within normal limits. The hospital was called and given a report of the resident's condition. Two attempts to notify the resident's representative were unsuccessful. A progress note, dated 12/14/25 at 10:18…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure shift to shift narcotic count and reconciliation was completed to mitigate risk of misappropriation for 2 of 3 carts reviewed for medication reconciliation. (D1 Hall and E1 Hall)Findings include: 1. During a medication storage observation of the D1 Hall medication cart, on 4/16/26 at 12:15 p.m., accompanied by LPN 14, the Shift change controlled substance inventory count sheet and the Pharmscript Controlled Drug Count Sheets were reviewed and the following dates lacked shift to shift count and reconciliation signatures of controlled medications:April 2026:April 5: day shift, evening shift and night shiftApril 6: evening and night shiftApril 7: evening shiftApril 8: evening shiftApril 9: evening shiftApril 10: evening shift During an interview at the time of observation, LPN 14 indicated the narcotic count sheets were incomplete due to missing shift to shift signatures. 2. During a medication storage observation of the E1 Hall medication cart, on 4/16/26 at 12:06 p.m., accompanied by QMA 15, the Pharmscript…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were developed and implemented for a resident prior to ordering an antipsychotic medication for insomnia for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 3) Finding includes:Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed on 4/17/26 at 10:45 a.m. Diagnoses included post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and depression. Orders included amitriptyline (antidepressant) 50 mg at bedtime for depression (3/20/26 -4/6/26), amitriptyline 50 mg at bedtime related to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and depression (4/10/26), trazodone (antidepressant) 50 mg at bedtime for insomnia related to depression and insomnia (3/20/26 - 4/6/26), trazodone (antidepressant) 50 mg at bedtime for insomnia (4/10/26), quetiapine (antipsychotic) 25 mg every 24 hours as needed (PRN) for insomnia related to bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and depression for 14 days (3/20/26 - 4/3/26), and quetiapine 25 mg every 24 hours PRN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served under safe and sanitary conditions when food was handled with bare hands during a meal service observation. Findings include: During a lunch service observation, on 4/17/26 at 12:37 p.m., the following was observed:Cook 16 picked up a roll with her bare hands before placing it on a resident's plate. [NAME] 16 grabbed a single scoop of mashed potatoes and place them on the food portion of the plate. A ping pong ball - size of mashed potatoes fell off the scoop and onto the handle of the stainless-steel pan. [NAME] 16 scooped up the mashed potatoes from the pan's handle with her bare hand before tossing it back into the pan of mashed potatoes.Cook 16 plated three rolls for three plates with her bare hand before using tongs.During an interview, on 4/17/26 at 1:16 p.m., [NAME] 16 indicated she could have slipped up and touched a piece of bread with her bare hands. She did not recall touching the mashed potatoes with her bare hands. Staff should not touch food with their bare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served under safe and sanitary conditions regarding food handling during a meal observation for 1 of 16 residents observed in the dining room. (Resident 49)Findings include:During a lunch observation, on 4/21/26 at 12:42 p.m., the following was observed:CNA 9 assisted Resident 49 with his meal tray. CNA 9 grabbed the top hamburger bun from Resident 49's fish sandwich with her bare hands before she placed the bun on Resident 49's tray. CNA 9 picked up a small plastic container of tartar sauce and asked Resident 49 if he wanted any on his sandwich. Resident 49 declined. CNA 9 put down the small plastic container of tarter sauce, picked up the top bun again with her bare hand and placed it on top of Resident 49's sandwich before walking away from the table.During an interview, on 4/21/26 at 12:46 p.m., CNA 9 indicated she touched Resident 49's hamburger bun with her bare hands. She should not touch any food bare handed.During an interview, on 4/21/26 at 2:25 p.m., the DON indicated staff should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement individualized interventions to mitigate the risk of pressure injuries for a resident experiencing decreased mobility while recovering from a hip fracture for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. (Resident E)Findings include:Resident E's clinical record was reviewed on 2/26/26 at 8:56 a.m. Diagnoses included chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, presence of automatic (implantable) cardiac defibrillator, encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, multiple sites, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility.Current physician's orders included sugar free nutritional supplement (promotes wound healing) 30 milliliters (ml) twice daily, nutritional supplement three times daily, dialysis friendly nutritional supplement three times…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse and intimidation by a staff member for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident C)Findings include:Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 9/29/25 at 12:10 p.m. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, depression, atrial fibrillation, and congestive heart failure.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/4/25, indicated Resident C was cognitively intact, had depression, required supervision for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and eating. Resident C did not exhibit hallucinations, delusions, or behaviors.A current care plan, initiated on 7/30/25, indicated Resident C had a diagnosis of depression. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, encouraging socialization, and observing signs and symptoms of depression (crying, seclusion from others, isolation, decreased appetite, withdrawal).A current care plan, initiated on 9/22/25, indicated Resident C used antidepressant medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for blood pressure and heart rate parameters were followed when medications were administered for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for blood pressure medications. (Resident B and Resident D) Findings include: 1. Resident D's clinical record was reviewed on 9/9/25 at 11:11 a.m. Diagnoses included essential hypertension, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery (plaque buildup in the artery) with unspecified angina pectoris (severe chest pain), and heart failure, unspecified. Physician orders included metoprolol tartrate (for blood pressure) 50 milligrams (mg) two times a day - hold for systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 100 either/or heart rate (HR) less than 60 (started 4/16/25 and discontinued 8/9/25), metoprolol tartrate 50 mg two times a day - hold if SBP less than 100 or HR less than 50 (started 8/9/25), losartan potassium (for blood pressure) 100 mg daily - hold for SBP less than 110 or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) less than 60…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and ensure the resident environment remained free of potential hazards for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for smoking. (Resident B, Resident E)Findings include:1.During an observation, on 7/16/25 at 12:14 p.m., Resident B held her cigarettes and lighter as she walked away from the designated smoking area. Resident B indicated she smoked independently and she was headed back to her room to store her cigarettes and smoking supplies. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 7/17/25 at 1:44 p.m. Diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive lung disease that makes it hard to breathe), depression, and anxiety.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/1/25, indicated Resident B was cognitively intact.Resident B's clinical record lacked an order for smoking.A smoking safety risk assessment, dated 4/28/25, indicated Resident B smoked daily and used cigarettes and a lighter. She did not have a history or currently present with unsafe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager completed the required education to meet the qualifications for a dietary manager. This deficiency had the potential to impact 58 of 58 facility residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. Finding includes: The employee record form, completed by the facility and provided following entrance conference on 4/27/25, indicated the Dietary Manager had been employed by the facility since 2/1/25 and lacked a dietary manager certification. During an interview, on 4/30/25 at 3:00 p.m., the Dietary Manager indicated he was in the process of getting his food manager certification. During an interview, on 5/1/25 at 11:59 a.m., the Nurse Consultant indicated the Dietary Manager did not have any food service manager certifications. During an interview, on 5/1/25 at 3:08 p.m., the Dietary Manager indicated he had twenty years of food service experience but was not technically a dietary manager until he started at the facility. He was not currently certified but was getting ready to take the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served under safe sanitary conditions regarding food handling and hand washing. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 55 of 55 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Findings include: During a lunch service observation, on 04/29/25 12:30 p.m. to 1:15 p.m., the following food handling and food service concerns were observed: Dietary Employee 7 (DE 7) propelled a resident forward in her wheelchair and locked the wheelchair brake. She did not perform hand hygiene before touching a set of tongs to place a lemon slice into a drink. She then touched the back of another female staff member before she lifted a container of lemon slices, with her left thumb touching the inside of the lemon slice container. Dietary Employee 8 (DE 8) grabbed a hot dog bun with his bare hands, place it on a plate, and opened it. No hand hygiene was performed. DE 8 crossed his ungloved hands, placing his hands on his waist and lower back. He went through meal tickets one by one like he was dealing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-02 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure mail was distributed to the residents on Saturdays. This deficiency had the potential to affect 58 of 58 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: During a Resident Council meeting, on 4/30/25 beginning at 3:35 p.m., Resident 40 indicated the facility did not deliver mail to the residents on Saturdays. The activity department staff was to deliver mail after the business office manager sorted it. The business office manager did not work weekends. Residents 41, 45, 58, 10, 28, 51, 2, 33, and 25 indicated they did not receive mail on Saturdays. During an interview, on 5/1/25 at 10:06 a.m., the Activity Director (AD) indicated the activity department delivered mail to the residents. Mail was distributed on the days that the Business Office Manager /Financial Coordinator (BOM) was at the facility. The BOM received and sorted the mail and placed it on the front desk when it was ready for distribution to the residents. During an interview, on 5/1/25 at 10:14 a.m., the BOM indicated that she sorted the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-02 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives received a copy of their baseline care plans on admission for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident 8, 52, 57, 61, and 264) Findings include: 1. Resident 52's clinical record was reviewed on 4/29/25 at 10:48 a.m. Diagnoses included alcoholic hepatic (liver) failure without coma, hepatic encephalopathy (disease or damage that affects the brain, leading to a change in mental state), type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar), unspecified anemia, and thrombocytopenia (low platelet count in the blood which can cause prolonged bleeding). A progress note, dated 12/5/24 at 12:45 p.m., indicated the resident was admitted to the facility. The clinical record lacked documentation that the resident or the resident's representative was provided with a copy of the baseline care plan prior to the completion of the comprehensive care plan. During an interview, on 5/1/25 at 11:04 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
During observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to change, label, and date oxygen and nebulizer supplies for 4 of 4 residents (Resident 5, 34, 56, and 264) and ensured residents received the correct flow rate of oxygen for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for oxygen use of 8 residents in the facility who required supplemental oxygen (Resident 56). Findings include: 1. Resident 34's clinical record was reviewed on 4/30/25 at 9:53 a.m. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), anxiety, and heart failure. Current orders included change out, date, and label oxygen humidifier and tubing every Sunday night. Oxygen at 4 liters per minute (LPM) continuously via nasal cannula. During an observation, on 4/27/25 at 2:55 p.m., Resident 34's oxygen tubing bag was dated 2/2/25. During an observation, on 4/30/25 at 10:32 a.m., Resident 34's oxygen tubing bag was dated 2/2/25. During an interview, on 4/27/25 at 3:54 p.m., QMA 21 indicated Resident 34's oxygen tubing bag was labeled 2/2/25. During an interview, on 4/29/25 at 1:39 p.m., LPN 22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were at an appetizing temperature for 12 of 15 residents reviewed for palatable meals. (Resident 17, 35, 61, 116, 23, 4, 53, 38, 56, 7, 2, and 30) Findings include: During an interview, on 4/27/25 at 10:12 a.m., Resident 61 indicated the food was always cold. During an interview, on 4/27/25 at 4:28 p.m., Resident 17 indicated the food was generally not hot at all. She was getting used to eating cold scrambled eggs. During a Resident Council meeting, on 4/30/25 at 3:35 p.m., the resident group indicated the room tray meals, especially in the evening, were cold. A facility document, provided during the entrance conference on 4/27/25, indicated breakfast was at 7:45 a.m., lunch at 12:30 p.m., and dinner at 5:45 p.m. During an observation, on 4/30/25 at 6:27 p.m., a closed meal cart was on the D Hall unit. At the same time, RN 6 indicated the meal cart had just arrived. During an observation, on 4/30/25 at 6:31 p.m., CNA 18, 19, and 20 began serving trays. During an observation, on 4/30/25 at 6:47…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's right to self-determination and communication for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Resident Rights. (Resident 19) Findings include: During an observation on 4/27/25 at 10:50 a.m., Resident 19 was lying in bed with a touch pad call light within reach. She indicated she was unable to turn and reposition herself and unable to call her family member. She relied on staff to help with all activities of daily living (ADLs). The Administrator had spoken to her about her frequent calls to her family member, telling her she called him too much and gave him too much information. Resident 19's clinical record was reviewed on 5/1/25 at 11:30 a.m. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, obsessive-compulsive disorder, mild intellectual disabilities, fibromyalgia, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. The resident's cognitive status was moderately impaired. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/9/25, indicated Resident 19 was dependent on staff for eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an accurate code status for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for advance directives. (Resident 10) Findings include: Resident 10's clinical record was reviewed on [DATE] at 10:13 a.m. Diagnoses included hypertension and dementia. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The current, main page on Resident 10's electronic health record indicated a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) code status. A current physician's order, dated [DATE], indicated Do Not Resuscitate. A current care plan, initiated on [DATE], indicated Resident 10 had a signed and valid DNR in the event she should stop breathing and display no pulse, as a result of failure of the heart to contract effectively or at all. Interventions included I will be enabled to live to the limit of my potential ability physically, mentally, and spiritually, administer medications as ordered, encourage the resident and family members to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding physician/nurse practitioner notification of a resident's weight gain for 1 of 23 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident 17) Findings include: Resident 17's clinical record was reviewed on 4/29/25 at 12:01 p.m. Diagnoses included essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, personal history of other diseases of the urinary system, presence of urogenital implants, presence of cardiac pacemaker, obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage and flow from the bladder backs up into the ureters which connect to the kidneys), and chronic kidney disease, stage 3a (moderate decline in kidney function). A current order, dated 3/27/25, indicated to weigh the resident daily and notify the physician or nurse practitioner if the resident had a weight gain of three pounds in a day or five pounds in a week. The resident weighed 178 pounds on 4/11/25. On 4/18/25, she weighed 183.4 pounds with a greater than five-pound weight gain in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment related to a clean, sanitary environment in a resident's room for 1 of 3 resident's reviewed for environment. (Resident 34) Findings include: During an observation on 4/27/25 at 2:55 p.m., Resident 34's trash can overflowed. Trash was on the floor beside the bed. A mask lay on the floor in the entryway of the room. A second mask lay on the floor beside the oxygen concentrator. The bedside table was visibly dirty. A pile of clothing was on the bathroom floor underneath the sink. A navy-blue clothing item lay on top of the pile. During an observation on 4/28/25 at 10:48 a.m., the resident's room continued to have trash surrounding the trash can and on the floor beside her bed. The previously observed masks remained on the floor, laying in the same locations. The bedside table had a large area (the size of large dining plate) of dried, sticky residue. During an interview on 4/29/25 at 9:54 a.m., Resident 34 indicated that housekeeping emptied her trash and swept the floor on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's representative or resident was notified in writing of transfer/discharge appeal rights for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Resident 31 and 52) Findings include: 1. Resident 52's clinical record was reviewed on 4/29/25 at 10:48 a.m. Diagnoses included alcoholic hepatic (liver) failure without coma, hepatic encephalopathy (disease or damage that affects the brain, leading to a change in mental state), type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar), and thrombocytopenia (low platelet count in the blood which can cause prolonged bleeding). A progress note, dated 12/8/24 at 5:50 p.m., indicated the resident was admitted to the hospital for hepatic encephalopathy. The resident's clinical record lacked indication that the resident and the resident's representative were notified of the transfer/discharge appeal rights in writing for the resident's transfer to the hospital. During an interview, on 5/1/25 at 2:59 p.m., RN 6 indicated she was not sure if the notice of transfer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's representative or resident received a written notice of the bed hold policy at the time of transfer for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Resident 31 and 52) Findings include: 1. Resident 52's clinical record was reviewed on 4/29/25 at 10:48 a.m. Diagnoses included alcoholic hepatic (liver) failure without coma, hepatic encephalopathy (disease or damage that affects the brain, leading to a change in mental state), type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar), and thrombocytopenia (low platelet count in the blood which can cause prolonged bleeding). A progress note, dated 12/8/24 at 5:50 p.m., indicated the resident was admitted to the hospital for hepatic encephalopathy. The resident's clinical record lacked indication that the resident and the resident's representative were notified of the bed hold policy in writing at the time of the resident's transfer to the hospital. During an interview, on 5/1/25 at 2:59 p.m., RN 6 indicated she was not sure if the bed hold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a recapitulation of the resident's stay was included in the discharge summary when the resident discharged from the facility. (Resident 27) Finding includes: Resident 27's clinical record was reviewed on 4/29/25 at 1:01 p.m. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), obstructive sleep apnea, other specified diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, bipolar disorder, unspecified, peripheral vascular disease, unspecified, gangrene, not elsewhere classified, and chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe). The resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 4/21/2025 at 10:00 a.m. to another long-term care facility. Her discharge paperwork lacked a summary of the resident's stay in the facility. A facility form, provided by the DON on 4/30/25 at 3:30 p.m., titled Discharge instructions, included the resident's vital signs, the resident's ordered medications, the resident's equipment and referral needs, the resident's dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding daily weight monitoring and administration of blood pressure medication according to ordered parameters for 2 of 23 residents reviewed for medications. (Residents 17 and 5) Findings include: 1. Resident 17's clinical record was reviewed on 4/29/25 at 12:01 p.m. Diagnoses included essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, personal history of other diseases of the urinary system, presence of urogenital implants, presence of cardiac pacemaker, obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage and flow from the bladder backs up into the ureters which connect to the kidneys), and chronic kidney disease, stage 3a (moderate decline in kidney function). A current order, dated 3/27/25, indicated to weigh the resident daily and notify the physician or nurse practitioner if the resident had a weight gain of three pounds in a day or five pounds in a week. The medication administration record for 4/1/25 through 4/1/28 indicated the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be protected from sexual abuse perpetrated by an employee engaging in sexually-toned conversations and behavior for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for sexual abuse. (Resident B) Findings include: A facility reportable document, dated 2/3/25 at 6:01 p.m., indicated it was reported to the DON and the Administrator that an employee, CNA 3, was texting Resident B inappropriate pictures. The employee was suspended and an investigation was initiated. During an interview on 2/13/25 at 12:45 p.m., Resident B indicated he had received pictures from CNA 3. He was okay with their relationship. He had no concerns with the situation except the CNA lost her job. He managed his own money and had given CNA 3 $50.00, but this was not for the photos. He had not asked her to send them to him, but he had not minded receiving them. CNA 3 and her husband had come to the facility to take him to a department store to buy a phone card, but were stopped by facility staff from transferring him into their vehicle. A clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the active licensure of a Practical Nurse (PN) who provided care to residents for 1 of 55 employees reviewed for active licensure. (PN 2) Findings include: During Employee Record Review, PN 2's nursing license was indicated as expired on [DATE] on the MyLicense.IN.gov website, accessed on [DATE] at 11:20 a.m. PN 2 worked as a nurse, providing resident care, following the expiration of her licensure on the following dates: [DATE], 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 27, and 28, 2024. [DATE], 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 25, 26, 30, and 31, 2024. [DATE], 5, 8, 9, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 27, 28, and 31, 2025. During an interview on [DATE] at 3:52 p.m., the DON indicated human resources was responsible for tracking staff licensure. PN 2 was allowed to continue working in her role as an LPN due to the facility not realizing her licensed had expired. She should not have been on the schedule until her licensure was updated and valid. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure sanitary kitchen food storage and handling conditions. This deficient practice had the potential to effect 59 of 59 facility residents who received their meals from the facility kitchen. Findings include: During a kitchen tour with [NAME] 1, on 12/11/24 at 10:10 a.m., the following concerns were observed: a. An open bag of sugar in a bin containing unknown particles of and trash in the bottom of the bin. b. Clean cups, bowls, and plates stored upright, exposing the eating surfaces. c. A cart holding clean dishes visibly soiled with dried food and splash stains. d. A bucket with dirty mop water and a mop leaning against the clean dishes rack. e. A cleaning bucket with used cleaning cloths stored under the oven. f. Soiled serving utensils on the preparation table. g. Dried spillage and trash over the surface of the floor. h. An open sleeve of bread on the preparation table with no open date on the packaging. i. An open, uncovered box of cream of wheat with no open date on the packaging. j. The three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report a resident to resident altercation to the State Agency. (Resident F and Resident G) Findings include: During an interview on 12/16/24 at 12:31 p.m., Resident F indicated she was hit by another resident in the chest. Resident F indicated she was attempting to enter the dining room and Resident G was blocking the entry way. She asked Resident G to move and the other resident became aggressive. Resident F indicated she had a bruise on her chest as a result of being hit. Resident F indicated she hit Resident G in response and there were staff witnesses to the incident. Resident F's residential clinical record was reviewed on 12/16/24 at 1:16 p.m. The clinical record lacked indication of behavioral concerns. Resident G's nursing home clinical record was reviewed on 12/16/24 at 1:25 p.m. Diagnoses included depression, dementia, anxiety, schizoaffective disorder, and hypertension. The resident had a history of verbally aggressive behaviors. During an interview on 12/16/24 at 2:19 p.m., the Corporate Regional [NAME]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication administration error for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 11/14/24 at 11:27 a.m. Diagnoses included cervical region spinal stenosis, type 2 diabetes, muscle wasting and atrophy, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and depression. Physician orders for October 2024 indicated the resident had an order for hydrocodone-acetaminophen (opioid analgesic) 10-325 mg every 6 hours as needed for pain, dated 10/10/24 and discontinued on 10/18/24. An order for hydromorphone (opioid analgesic) 4 mg every 4 hours as needed for severe pain was dated 10/11/24 and discontinued 10/18/24. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for October 2024 indicated the following for Resident B: a. RN 1 administered hydrocodone-acetaminophen 10-325 mg on 10/12/24 at 10:38 p.m. On 10/12/24 at 10:35 p.m.,hydromorphone 4 mg was given. The pain rate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were competent in the administration of controlled medications as evidenced by RN 1 administering two opioid analgesics together to a resident (Resident B). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 11/14/24 at 11:27 a.m. Diagnoses included cervical region spinal stenosis, type 2 diabetes, muscle wasting and atrophy, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and depression. Physician orders for October 2024 indicated the resident had an order for hydrocodone-acetaminophen (opioid analgesic) 10-325 mg every 6 hours as needed for pain, dated 10/10/24 and discontinued on 10/18/24. An order for hydromorphone (opioid analgesic) 4 mg every 4 hours as needed for severe pain was dated 10/11/24 and discontinued 10/18/24. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for October 2024 indicated the following for Resident B: a. RN 1 administered hydrocodone-acetaminophen 10-325 mg on 10/12/24 at 10:38 p.m. On 10/12/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a qualified dietary manager supervised the kitchen staff and operations. This deficiency had the potential to affect 54 of 55 residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. Finding includes: During an interview, on 6/24/24 at 10:13 a.m., the Head [NAME] indicated the kitchen had been without a manager for six to seven months. During an interview, on 6/24/24 at 4:14 p.m., the Administrator indicated the facility did not currently have a dietary manager. She was filling in as the dietary manager. The employee records, provided by the Administrator on 6/25/24 at 9:50 a.m., did not include a dietary manager. During an interview, on 6/27/24 at 9:24 a.m., the Head [NAME] indicated she was not certified as a dietary manager, but she and the Administrator had been discussing getting her into a certification class. She indicated the dietician came in about three times a month. During an interview, on 6/28/24 at 11:55 a.m., the Administrator indicated a new dietary manager had started on 6/24/24. The prior dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain physician orders for medications and assess residents for self-administration of medications for 2 of 2 residents with medications stored in their rooms. (Resident 35 and Resident 52) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 6/24/24 at 11:38 a.m., a mometasone furoate nasal spray (used to treat and prevent symptoms of seasonal and perennial hay fever) was on Resident 52's bedside table. Resident 52 indicated she gave herself a spray in each nostril in the morning and evening. During an observation, on 6/26/24 at 12:41 p.m., the nasal spray remained on the resident's bedside table. During an observation, on 6/27/24 at 2:37 p.m., the nasal spray remained on the resident's bedside table. Resident 52's clinical record was reviewed on 6/25/24 at 2:19 p.m. and lacked a physician's order for mometasone furoate spray and a self-administration of medication assessment. During an interview, on 6/27/24 at 3:57 p.m., LPN 8 indicated the residents were permitted to have medications in their rooms if there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were developed and signed by the resident, who was cognitively intact and their own representative, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for advance directive. (Resident 35) Findings include: Resident 35's clinical record was reviewed on 6/26/24 at 9:23 a.m. Diagnoses included unspecified adrenocortical insufficiency (Addison's disease), epilepsy, unspecified, not intractable, without status epilepticus, and cirrhosis of liver. Current physician's orders included full code (9/7/23). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/9/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. An Indiana Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form was completed on 9/7/23. Section E indicated in order for the POST form to be effective the patient or legally appointed representative must sign and date the form. Under the signature of patient or legally appointed representative section, the resident's representative had signed the form on 9/7/23. The resident's profile indicated the resident was the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code medications on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication use. (Resident D) Finding includes: Resident D's clinical record was reviewed on 6/25/24 at 4:12 p.m. Diagnoses included depression, delusional disorders, hallucinations, unspecified, vascular dementia, moderate, with agitation, and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery (a build-up of fats, cholesterol, and other substances in and on the artery walls causing obstruction of blood flow) without angina pectoris (chest pain). Current physician orders included the following: clopidogrel bisulfate (antiplatelet - used to inhibit blood clot formation) 75 mg daily (11/20/23), mirtazapine (antidepressant) 7.5 mg daily at bedtime (2/16/24), risperidone (antipsychotic) 0.5 mg daily in the morning (3/2/24), risperidone 1 mg daily at bedtime (3/1/24), and sertraline (antidepressant) 100 mg daily (1/24/24). A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 2/20/24, indicated the resident received insulin. The assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide grooming assistance (Resident C and D) and provide scheduled showers (Resident D) for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 6/25/24 at 11:43 a.m., Resident D's representative indicated the resident's fingernails were always dirty. During an observation, on 6/25/24 at 4:26 p.m., Resident D was lying in bed. Her fingernails had a brown substance under the tips. During an observation, on 6/26/24 at 9:44 a.m., the resident was lying in bed. A brown substance was under her fingernail tips. The resident indicated she wanted a sponge bath. Resident D's clinical record was reviewed on 6/25/24 at 4:12 p.m. Diagnoses included depression, delusional disorders, hallucinations, unspecified, vascular dementia, moderate, with agitation, and need for assistance with personal care. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/5/24, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. No behaviors were identified. She required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of a pressure injury for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. (Resident 31) Finding includes: During an observation, on 6/24/24 at 12:15 p.m., Resident 31 was lying on his back in bed with heel boots on. During an observation, on 6/25/24 at 2:19 p.m., the resident was lying on his back in bed with heel boots on. During an observation, on 6/26/24 at 12:42 p.m., the resident was lying on his back in bed with heel boots on. Resident 31's clinical record was reviewed on 6/26/24 at 2:25 p.m. Diagnoses included methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere, nontraumatic hematoma of soft tissue, other mechanical complication of surgically created arteriovenous fistula, dependence on renal dialysis, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and need for assistance with personal care. Current physician orders included the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to address the dietary needs for a dialysis resident related to impaired nutrition for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis. (Resident 28) Finding includes: During an observation, on 6/25/24 at 2:32 p.m., Resident 28 was sitting in a wheelchair in his room. His lunch tray was sitting on his table in front of him with meatloaf, mixed vegetables, a dessert, coffee and an empty cup with remnants of a brown liquid. He ate less than 25% of his meatloaf and nothing else. He indicated the food lacked something but could not verbalize what. There were no condiments on his tray. He stated, It's just too hard with these teeth. He was wearing dentures. During an observation, on 6/26/24 at 9:19 a.m., the resident was eating his breakfast while watching TV. His breakfast plate was empty and he indicated his food was actually warm today. He did not eat any of the oatmeal. He drank his coffee and there was a milk carton on his tray. He indicated that he did not get lunch prior to or during dialysis that he attended every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Resident 108's clinical record was completed on 6/26/24 at 9:36 a.m. Diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), abnormalities of gait and mobility, unsteadiness on feet, and a need for assistance with personal care. An admission MDS assessment, dated 6/22/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A physician's order, dated 6/20/24 at 6:00 p.m., indicated the resident should be assessed for pain every shift. A physician's order, dated 6/19/24 at 5:00 p.m., included Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (a narcotic pain reliever) 5-325 mg, 1 tablet by mouth, every 4 hours, as needed, for moderate pain. A current care plan, dated 6/20/24, indicated to give medications as ordered by physician and to monitor and document side effects and effectiveness of medications. A review of routine shift pain assessments indicated a zero (0) pain rating, on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable, was documented by nursing on 6/20/24, 6/21/24, 6/22/24, 6/23/24, 6/25/24, and 6/26/24. On 6/20/2024 at 9:30 a.m., the resident had rated his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow pharmacy recommendations for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 1) Findings include: Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed on 6/26/24 at 2:39 p.m Diagnoses included schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, unspecified intellectual abilities, and anxiety disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set evaluation, dated 5/20/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required substantial to maximal assistance from staff for activities of daily living. A gradual dose reduction recommendation from the pharmacist, dated 11/22/23, indicated the resident was receiving the antipsychotic medication Risperdal (antipsychotic) 2 mg by mouth twice a day. Residents taking Risperdal required an AIMS (abnormal involuntary movement scale) assessment to be performed every 6 months. The last assessment, noted by the pharmacist, was performed on 5/22/23. The resident was due for an AIMS assessment at the time of the recommendation. On 12/18/23, a second request from the pharmacist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide prompt dental services for ill-fitting dentures to 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dental services (Resident 28). Finding includes: The resident's record review was completed on 6/25/24 at 2:39 p.m. Medical diagnoses included, but were not limited to: unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition; anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD); and unspecified dementia with unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety. Current physician orders included regular diet,thin consistency with no tomatoes, bananas, orange juice or potatoes (5/20/2024). The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 5/13/24 indicated the resident did not have broken or loosely fitting full or partial dentures (chipped, cracked, uncleanable, or loose). A current care plan, initiated on 9/12/21, included: I exhibit dental/mouth problems: I have no natural teeth (9/12/21), I will not develop oral/dental complications (5/20/24), report changes in oral status to MD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention strategies related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions. (Resident 44 and Resident 53) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 6/24/24 at 12:15 p.m., Resident 53 was lying in his bed. The resident's door and room had no posted signage. During an observation, on 6/25/24 at 2:19 p.m., the resident was lying on his back in bed with his eyes closed. The resident's door had no posted signage. Resident 53's clinical record was reviewed on 6/26/24 at 2:25 p.m. Diagnoses included methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere, nontraumatic hematoma of soft tissue, other mechanical complication of surgically created arteriovenous fistula, and dependence on renal dialysis. The physician orders lacked an order for enhanced barrier precautions. A progress note, dated 1/19/24 at 1:24 p.m., indicated the resident readmitted to the facility with a wound to the left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's preference to utilize a foot pedal for her wheelchair for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for resident rights. (Resident C) Findings include: Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 2/7/24 at 11:25 a.m. Diagnoses included embolism and thrombosis of other specified veins, recurrent, unsteadiness on feet, need for assistance with personal care, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, and unspecified fracture of shaft of right tibia (lower leg bone), subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing. Her orders included fondaparinux sodium (blood thinner) 0.4 milliliter subcutaneously daily and weight bearing as tolerated to her right lower extremity. During an interview with Resident C, on 2/7/24 at 12:18 p.m., she indicated she had broken her right leg, it was swollen from the knee down, and she couldn't put the brace on it for her foot drop (unable to flex foot toward knee). She wanted to be able to put her foot up because of the swelling. They told her to elevate her leg and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure competent treatement for a pressure injury was completed according to physician's orders for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for wound care. (Resident D) Findings include: Resident D's clinical record was reviewed on 2/7/24 at 3:26 p.m. Diagnoses included methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy and peripheral vascular disease. His physician's orders included Santyl ointment (enzymatic debridement), apply to right heel topically daily. Wash wound with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply to wound bed, cover with nonstick pad, and wrap with Kerlix. He had an unstageable (full-thickness pressure injuries in which the base is obscured by slough and/or eschar) pressure ulcer to his right heel that measured 2.5 cm (centimeters) length by 3.5 cm width. During a wound care observation for Resident D, on 2/7/24 at 2:34 p.m., LPN 15 applied medical grade honey (autolytic debridement) with a gauze pad to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0942 — isolatedEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure annual resident rights training was completed for 1 of 4 employees (the Administrator) reviewed for annual resident rights training. Findings include: Employee records were reviewed on 2/8/24 at 1:56 p.m. and indicated the following: The Administrator annual resident rights training was not completed. During an interview with the Administrator, with the Nurse Consultant present, on 2/8/24 at 3:22 p.m., she indicated a lot of the inservices had not opened yet. They opened according to the employee's hire date, but the employees should had completed last year's inservices. A current facility policy, dated 10/1/22, titled Employee Education, provided on the conference room table on 2/8/24 at 3:41 p.m., indicated the following: .Guidelines: The facility shall provide a Staff Education Plan in accordance with State and Federal regulations .4. The staff education plan shall ensure that education is conducted annually for all facility employees, at a minimum, in the following areas .e. Resident rights This citation relates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure required abuse training was completed for 2 of 4 employees reviewed for annual abuse training. (Administrator and LPN 12) Findings include: Employee records were reviewed on 2/8/24 at 1:56 p.m. and indicated the following: The Administrator's annual abuse training was not completed. LPN 12's annual abuse training was not completed. During an interview with the Administrator, with the Nurse Consultant present on 2/8/24 at 3:22 p.m., she indicated a lot of the inservices had not opened yet. They opened according to the employee's hire date, but the employees should had completed last year's inservices. A current facility policy, dated 10/1/22 and titled Employee Education, provided on the conference room table on 2/8/24 at 3:41 p.m., indicated the following: .Guidelines: The facility shall provide a Staff Education Plan in accordance with State and Federal regulations .4. The staff education plan shall ensure that education is conducted annually for all facility employees, at a minimum, in the following areas .c.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report a communicable disease outbreak to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) involving 7 of 44 residents who resided in the facility (Residents 3, 7, 16, 24, 33, 34, and 36). Finding includes: During on observation, on 12/12/23 at 9:30 a.m., a sign on the facility entrance doors indicated the facility had COVID-19 in the building. During an interview, on 12/12/23 at 9:40 a.m., the Administrator indicated they had an outbreak of COVID-19 in the building. Four residents were currently infected with COVID-19. She was uncertain of the number of staff who were infected. During an observation, on 12/12/23 at 11:00 a.m., signage on the doors of rooms 135, 136, 140, and 142 indicated transmission-based precautions were required to enter the rooms. A line list for COVID-19 surveillance, provided by the Administrator on 12/12/23 at 3:16 p.m., indicated three residents had tested positive for COVID-19 on 11/25/23. Four residents had tested positive for COVID-19 on 12/4/23. Eleven employees had tested positive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan to prevent further falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident C) B. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to develop care plans for residents with pressure related wounds for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds (Resident B, D and F). Findings include: A. Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 11/8/23 10:52 a.m. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, essential (primary) hypertension, epilepsy, unspecified, intractable, with status epilepticus, Parkinson's disease, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, muscle weakness (generalized), aftercare following joint replacement surgery, cognitive communication deficit, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/25/23, indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. She required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a wound VAC (Vacuum - Assisted Closure) was placed on a resident's wound after a surgical procedure in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds (Resident B). Findings include: Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 11/8/23 at 9:47 a.m. Diagnoses included chronic viral hepatitis, essential (primary) hypertension, heart failure, unspecified, chronic kidney disease, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and other specified postprocedural states. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/24/23, indicated she was cognitively intact. She required supervision for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. She had a surgical wound. A hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated Resident B had a history of a bowel obstruction and diverticular stricture which resulted in multiple bowel resections with end colostomy. She underwent colostomy reversal. She had minimal pain and tolerated her diet.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$15,935 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $15,935 — penalty dated 2026-02-26
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to APERION CARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.3 | +1.7 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APERION INDIANA INVESTOR GROUP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 12% | since 09/21/2018 |
| BERKOWITZ, BENJAMIN | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 09/21/2018 |
| ATTINGER, JEFFERY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/21/2018 |
| MARSHALL, LATISHA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/21/2018 |
| CLAXTON, RYAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/21/2018 |
| ULBERT, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/21/2018 |
| APERION CARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/16/2025 |
| MAJOR HOSPITAL | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/16/2025 |
| MAZHAR, ALIZA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/21/2018 |
| SHIRELS, TAMERA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/21/2018 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/21/2018 |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/21/2018 |
| BERKOWITZ, DAVID | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/05/2026 |
| MEYSTEL, YOSEF | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/05/2026 |
| APERION CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/21/2018 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/21/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $833K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155799. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.