Alta Rehab At Oak Brook
2013 Midwest Road, Oak Brook, IL 60521 · For profit - Corporation · 156 certified beds · (630) 495-0220 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $76,863 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-14)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 24% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.1% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.6% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 35.6% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.2% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.3% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.6% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.8% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 56.9% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.4% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.1% | 13.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.63 | 2.02 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.66 | 2.22 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 670 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 53.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 241 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.0%CMS range 58.9–65.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 7.5–11.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 44.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.6% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 4.3–8.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.98 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 156 beds and averages 86.6 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 69 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.38 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.72 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.53 to 1.00 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's foot was supported during wheelchair transport which resulted in a fracture of the lower leg. This past noncompliance occurred from October 27, 2025, through October 29, 2025.This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents in the sample of 6.The findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, spastic hemiplegia affecting the right dominant side. Paraplegia, fracture of both the right and left femurs with surgical repair, diabetes mellitus, dementia, and left tibia fracture added October 27, 2025. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated November 26, 2025, showed R1 was cognitively intact and required assistance with ADLs including set up assistance with eating, partial assistance with oral hygiene, substantial assistance with upper body dressing and dependent on staff for lower body dressing, toileting, bathing, bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to transfer a resident using a mechanical lift safely. This failure caused R1 to be dropped from mechanical lift resulting in an ankle fracture. This applies to one of three (R1) reviewed for falls in the sample of 7.This past non-compliance occurred from May 16, 2024, to June 2, 2024.Past noncompliance-no plan of correction required.The findings include:On 10/31/2025 at 11:30 AM, V10 (R1's family) said R1 was dropped from the mechanical lift on 05/16/2024 due to only one staff member attempting the transfer and without properly applying the sling. V10 stated the fall broke R1's ankle. V10 said R1 was transferred to the hospital the next day. R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of dementia, atrial fibrillation, congestive failure, and pain. A physician order dated 05/06/2024 showed R1 was admitted to hospice care. Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed R1 was severely cognitively impaired. The care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report, assess, and obtain treatment orders for a resident identified with a new wound before it became unstageable. This failure resulted in R61 receiving delayed wound care and deterioration of the wound. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R61) reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of 23. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R61 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R61's EMR showed multiple diagnoses including encephalopathy, malnutrition, intervertebral disc degeneration of the lumbar region, history of malignant neoplasm of the prostate, dementia, anxiety, pain, ataxia, and left foot drop. R61's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/15/2024 showed R61 required substantial to maximal staff assistance with personal hygiene and bed mobility. The MDS continued to show R61 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers because R61 had acquired an unstageable ulcer at the facility. On 7/16/2024 at 11:23 AM, V16 (Wound Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-04-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate nutrition, thorough assessment and assistance with eating to prevent significant weight loss. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing a weight loss of 20.7 % in three months. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 4. The findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia, presence of left artificial hip, malignant neoplasm of the prostrate, and pressure ulcer of the sacrum. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated March 15, 2024, showed R1 was severely cognitively impaired and required assistance with ADLs including partial assistance with eating and dependent on staff for bed mobility, dressing, bathing, toileting and transfer. R1's care plan for ADLs revised on March 27, 2024. showed per report, resident noted able to lift utensils and appear to place food in his mouth during meals but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to inform a resident's Healthcare Power of Attorney of the provision of atypical care requests. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for resident rights in a sample of 5.The findings include:MDS, dated [DATE], shows R1's cognition was severely impaired. Grievance dated 12/29/25 shows V4 (Healthcare Power of Attorney) expressed concern that R1's pubic hair was shaved by a facility CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) without permission. The grievance resolution shows education to staff was provided regarding notifying resident power of attorney of special requests that do not fall within standards listed in facility policy. On 1/14/26 at 11:53 PM, V4 (Family - Healthcare Power of Attorney) stated she never gave the facility staff permission to shave R1's pubic hair. On 1/13/26 at 10:53 AM with V2 (Director of Nursing) and V17 (Restorative), R1's pubic area was examined, appeared to have been recently shaved, and showed approximately 1/4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident representative was given accurate information regarding authorization to use an electronic monitoring device in the resident room, resulting in miscommunication and lack of informed consent related to resident rights. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for electronic monitoring device in the sample of 8.The findings include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), acute bronchitis, and positive Covid 19, based on the face sheet.R1's admission observation record dated August 29, 2025 showed that the resident was alert and oriented x two (to person and place). R1's OT (occupational therapy) evaluation dated August 30, 2025 showed that the resident was moderately impaired with decision making. R1's OT treatment encounter notes dated September 1, 2025 showed, that the resident was confused. On September 4, 2025 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that grievances were identified, documented, and addressed in accordance with facility policy. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for grievances.The Findings Include: Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) showed that R1, a [AGE] year-old male, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], from a hospital following a fall. R1's documented diagnoses included, but were not limited to: dementia, repeated falls, ataxia, muscle wasting, lack of coordination, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cirrhosis, protein-calorie malnutrition, and depression. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 as having moderately impaired cognition and requiring substantial to maximum assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs).An admission skin assessment dated [DATE], documented the following impairments: -Left elbow skin tear measuring 0.5 cm x 0.5 cm x 0.1 cm with 100% bright pink tissue and light…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment for a skin tear as ordered by the physician. The facility also failed to reassess a worsening skin impairment, did not notify the physician of its changes to ensure timely and appropriate interventions, and lacked a care plan outlining specific interventions to manage multiple skin impairments.This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for skin impairments. The Findings Include:The Electronic Medical record (EMR) showed that R1, a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], from a hospital following a fall. R1's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, repeated falls, ataxia, muscle wasting, lack of coordination, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cirrhosis, protein-calorie malnutrition, and depression.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 as having moderately impaired cognition and requiring substantial to maximum assistance with activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were transferred in a safe manner to 2 of 62 residents (R9, R42) reviewed for safety in the sample of 62. The findings include:1.R9's face sheet printed on 8/4/25 show R9 has diagnoses that include hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, multiple sclerosis, renal failure and bladder mass.R9's facility assessment show R9 has no cognitive impairment.R9's progress notes dated 7/18/2025 timed at 4:20 PM, documents, resident (R9) was transferring from wheelchair to bed with two staff assist using stand lift machine when her legs started to give out, resident said she has right leg pain and cannot stand longer in the machine, so resident was lowered to the floor by staff. Resident eased to lie down on the floor with pillow underneath her head, resident wanted to go back to bed so staff transferred resident to bed using (Mechanical lift machine). NP was notified with orders to administer PRN pain medication and if pain persists order an X-ray follow up assessment, resident said she's fine, no new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care for residents who required staff assistance for toileting, repositioning, and bathing. This applies to 16 of 16 residents (R1-R16) reviwed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care in a sample of 16. The findings include: 1. Face sheet, dated 3/18/25, shows R3's diagnoses include senile degeneration of brain, Alzheimer's disease, bipolar disorder, history of seizures, depression, psychosis, and anxiety. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 1/7/25, shows R3 was severely impaired and required substantial assistance from staff for toileting. The MDS showed R3 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Bowel and bladder incontinence care plan, initiated 2/17/25, shows R3 was unable to make her needs known and needed assistance with toileting. The care plan shows R3's approaches include checking R3 every two hours and assisting with toileting her as needed. Advanced Practice Registered Nurse progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was promptly assessed for injury following an incident during transfer with the mechanical lift machine. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for assessment, in the sample of 7. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to the local hospital on September 6, 2024. R1 did not return to the facility. R1 had multiple diagnoses including drug-induced polyneuropathy, sepsis, left food drop, metabolic acidosis, hemorrhage, UTI (Urinary Tract Infection), acute kidney failure, colon cancer, abnormal posture, history of falling, cardiac arrhythmia, anemia, and atrial fibrillation. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated June 25, 2024 shows R1 was cognitively intact, required supervision with eating, oral and personal hygiene, substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility, and was dependent on facility staff for all other ADLs (Activities of Daily Living),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's leaking indwelling urinary catheter was changed in a timely manner, and a resident's indwelling urinary catheter was changed monthly as documented by the physician. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R2, R4) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters in the sample of 7. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EMR continues to show R2 was sent to the local hospital on December 24, 2024 and returned to the facility on January 6, 2025. R2 has multiple diagnoses including, cellulitis of the left and right lower limbs, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, acute kidney failure, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), lack of coordination, unstageable pressure ulcer of the sacral region, nicotine dependence, unsteadiness on feet, morbid obesity, and PVD (Peripheral Vascular Disease). R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated January 9, 2025 shows R2 is cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred with two people while using a mechanical lift as shown in the facility's policy. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls in the sample of 5. The findings include: On November 25, 2024 at 9:01 AM, R1 was sitting in the dining room in a high back wheelchair. R1 was unable to answer questions due to her cognitive status. On November 25, 2024 at 10:28 AM, R1 was transferred to her bed from the high back wheelchair using a mechanical lift. V8 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) provided incontinence care to R1. As V8 removed R1's pants, a four-by-four-inch dressing was visible on R1's left shin. The date 11/24 was written on the dressing. The dressing was dry and intact. No bruising was noted. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 has multiple diagnoses including, senile brain degeneration, dementia with agitation, depressive episodes, dysphagia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders to administer antihypertensive and pain medications to a resident (R1) with diagnoses of hypertension, recent back surgery, and chronic back pain. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for significant medications in the sample of 4. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed that R1, a [AGE] year-old with diagnoses that includes spondylosis with radiculopathy, lumbar region, encounter for orthopedic after care, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, GERD (gastro-esophageal regurgitation disease), hypothyroidism, anemia, protein calorie malnutrition, lactose intolerance, s/p (status post) L5/S1 (lumbar and sacral) laminectomy on October 8,2024, and chronic back pain. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 1:36 P.M., and was discharged home against medical advice on October 11,2024. R1 left the facility at 9:45 A.M. The POS (Physician Order Sheet) for the month of October 2024 showed physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide feeding assistance and timely incontinent care to dependent residents. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R1 and R4) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care in a sample of 4. The Findings Include: 1. R1 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with an admitting diagnosis, including cervical spine myelopathy. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documents that R1 has intact cognition. R1's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 10/17/24 documented that R1 is on a regular, thin-liquid diet, with one to one feeding. On 10/31/24 at 8:45 AM, R1 stated, I need feeding assistance; they just started feeding me yesterday. Before, I was like a dog, putting my face on a plate to eat what I could get like a dog. I don't have a good grip on my hand. My condition deteriorated from cervical myelopathy. On 10/31/24 at 11:10 AM, V3 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated, If a resident is a feeder, it should be on the diet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy ensure resident and family grievances are promptly resolved. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) in the sample of 4. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including, lymphedema, hypertension, morbid obesity, polyosteoarthritis, bursitis of right shoulder, depression, noncompliance with medical treatment, candidiasis of skin and nails, uterine cancer, and functional urinary compliance. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated July 8, 2024 shows R1 is cognitively intact, requires setup assistance with eating and oral hygiene, partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene, and is dependent on facility staff for toilet hygiene, showering, lower body dressing, bed mobility,, and transfers between surfaces. R1 is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to develop resident-centered care plans. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for resident rights and policy and procedure in the sample of 4. The findings include: 1. On September 16, 2024 at 11:20 AM, R1 was lying in bed in her room. R1 said her incontinence brief was wet and no staff had changed her brief since 2:00 AM. V5 (Agency CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) said she reported for duty at the facility at 9:30 AM, was assigned to care for R1, and had not changed her incontinence brief during the time she had been on duty. V5 continued to say she had never worked with R1 and was not familiar with R1's care preferences, including if R1 requires assistance with turning in the bed, or has incontinence or skin care concerns. V6 (CNA) and V7 (WCN-Wound Care Nurse/RN-Registered Nurse) entered the room to assist with R1's incontinence care. R1 was very particular regarding her positioning during the incontinence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promptly respond to call lights when a resident required assistance, failed to provide timely incontinence care, failed to provide feeding assistance as ordered by the physician, and failed to provide showers/bed baths as shown in the facility's policy. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) in the sample of 4. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including, lymphedema, hypertension, morbid obesity, polyosteoarthritis, bursitis of right shoulder, depression, noncompliance with medical treatment, candidiasis of skin and nails, uterine cancer, and functional urinary compliance. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated July 8, 2024 shows R1 is cognitively intact, requires setup assistance with eating and oral hygiene, partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene, and is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to discard outdated food items and maintain the kitchen in a manner that prevent food borne illness. This applies to 108 of 109 residents serviced by the dietary services. Findings include: 1. On 7/16/24 at 10:10 AM, the kitchen was toured with V4 Dietary Manager. On 7/16/24 at 10:29 AM, the vent covers over the stove were covered with grease and lint / dust. On 7/16/24 at 10:32 AM, the covered meat slicer had smears of grease on the blade and crust on slicers base. On 7/16/24 at 10:35 AM, V4 Dietary Manager stated testing logs were not maintained for the three sanitizing buckets. On 7/16/24 at 1:17 PM, V5 Dietary Staff stated the kitchen staff was responsible for maintaining the unit refrigerators cleaning, discarding outdate items, and the temperature logs. On 7/16/24 at 1:30 PM, V4 stated the same sanitizer that is used for the three-compartment sink is used for the disinfecting buckets. V4 stated the policy the facility follows for the three-compartment sink applies to the sanitization buckets. The label on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to place residents' call lights within reach. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R41, R58) assessed for accommodation of needs in a sample of 23. The findings include: 1. On July 16, 2024 at 1:20 PM, V37 (R41's Family Member) said when she arrived at the facility, R41 was sitting in the wheelchair and her call light was behind her, out of reach. V37 said her biggest concern was the staff would put R41 in the chair and the call light was not in reach, and she wanted her mother to be able to call for help. On July 17, 2024 at 2:05 PM, V37 said she noticed the housekeeping staff do not put the call light within reach of R41 after making the beds and felt the facility staff should attach the call light to the wheelchair. On July 18, 2024 at 9:14 AM, R41 was lying in bed and V39 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) and V30 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) were providing care for R41. After providing care, V39 and V30 left R41's room, and R41's adaptive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reassess a resident for an appropriate-fitting device who had a hand wound; failed to ensure skin prevention interventions were implemented for a resident with a known behavior of scratching; and failed to check blood glucose levels prior to a resident eating or wipe the first drop of blood. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R58, R61) reviewed for quality of care in a sample of 23. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R61 had multiple diagnoses including encephalopathy, dementia, and anxiety. R61's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/05/2024 showed R61 was dependent on facility staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). On 7/16/2024 at 10:41 AM, R61 was assisted back to bed after his shower for dressing by V17 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA). R61 had dressings to his left hand and right anterior thigh; and an open area to his left anterior thigh. V17 said she noticed R61's left thigh open area that morning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a resident's decrease in range of motion. This applies to 1of 3 residents (R36) reviewed for range of motion in a sample of 23. Findings include: R36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R36's primary diagnoses include acute kidney failure, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, hypertension, gout, dementia and poly-osteoarthritis. On 7/17/24 at 1:58 PM, R36 was lying in bed and her left hand was contracted; R36 was unable to extend the fingers of her left hand. R36 stated she did not have a splint for her hand. On 7/17/24 at 2:02 PM, V6 C.N.A (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated R36 did not have hand splint on her plan. On 7/17/24 at 2:06 PM, V7 Restorative Nurse stated when R36 was admitted to the facility, she should have had an OT (Occupational Therapy) and PT (Physical Therapy) assessment. The assessments direct the staff on how she transfers and the care assistance she requires. V7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to act on the pharmacy MRR (Medication Regimen Review) and provide documentation monthly MMR. This applies to 2 of 5 (R44 and R52) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and Monthly MMR in a sample of 23. Findings include: 1. R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R44 has diagnoses that include dementia with anxiety and agitation, hyperlipidemia, psychosis, major depressive disorder, osteoporosis, and repeated falls. R44 is currently being followed by hospice and has a physician's order for DNRCC (Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care). The pharmacist MRR for R44 dated 1/10/24 states resident on psychotropic therapy Mirtazapine 7.5mg at bedtime since 2/2/23. Pharmacist request for physician review for GDR, such as discontinue Mirtazapine via gradual taper and document if any change in therapy is contraindicated. V43 MD written response No changes. Continue Mirtazapine on 3/18/24, more than two months after MRR was submitted by pharmacist. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prime an insulin pen prior to administration. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R58) reviewed for significant medication error in a sample of 23. The findings include: On July 17, 2024 at 8:17 AM, V25 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) was observed during medication pass. V25 said he was going to administer 25 units of Humalog insulin and after cleaning the pen and attaching the needle, turned the pen to administer 25 units. V25 did not prime the insulin pen prior to administration. V25 then administered the 25 units of Humalog insulin to R58. On July 18, 2024 at 12:55 PM, V25 said you have to prime the needle before giving a dose using the insulin pen. On July 18, 2024 at 12:53 PM, V27 (LPN) said the procedure is to prime the insulin pen with two units of insulin prior to administration. On July 18, 2024 at 1:41 PM, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) said the insulin pen should be primed with two units of insulin prior to administration. R58's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dental services to a resident requesting and requiring dentures. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R41) reviewed for dental services in a sample of 23. The findings include: On July 16, 2024 at 1:20 PM, V37 (R41's Family Member) said R41 had dentures that no longer fit and she had asked for a new set. V37 said a dental hygienist came to visit R41 and said she needed dentures, but no dentist came to see her. V37 said the visit happened two months ago. V37 said R41 was on a mechanical soft diet because she needed new dentures and had passed the swallow test to have a regular diet. On July 18, 2024 at 2:10 PM, V37 said a dental hygienist came in and cleaned and sanitized R41's dentures, gave her oral swabs, and tested out R41's dentures and said they were the wrong size and she needed to be seen by the dentist. V37 said R41 had a stroke, and she was told by the staff who assisted with testing her feeding ability that R41 could be seen by a dentist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to explain and obtain an appropriate arbitration agreement contract from a resident (R67) with impaired decision-making. This applies to 1 out of 5 (R67) residents in a sample of 23. The findings include: R67's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) showed R67 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple admission diagnoses including dementia. R67's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/16/2024 showed R67 was severely cognitively impaired. On 7/17/2024 at 2:05 PM, R67 was in bed. R67 was confused and unable to engage in an interview. V13 (Registered Nurse/RN) said R67 was very confused and unable to make decisions. On 7/16/2024 at 3:55 PM V12 (Admissions Assistant) said she was responsible for obtaining arbitration agreement contracts for residents. V12 said she shows the residents or residents' representatives an arbitration video and at the end of the video she asks them if they want to sign or decline the arbitration agreement contract. V12 said if a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement strategies and equipment to prevent pressure injury. This applies to 1 resident (R2) of 3 residents observed for prevention and treatment of pressure injury. According to the MDS (minimum data set) for R2, R2 was admitted to the facility January 9, 2024 with advanced dementia and requires moderate assistance with bed mobility and substantial assistance with all transfers. The facility provided records of R2's pressure injuries which shows R2 has a pressure injury to the left heel, diagnosed on [DATE]. The wound is described as unstageable. The wound assessment performed by the Wound Doctor, dated April 10, 2024, shows the wound as worsening. The wound assessment performed by the Wound Doctor, dated April 17, 2024, shows the wound as improving. On April 17, 2024 at 11:30am, R2 was in the dining room eating lunch. After lunch was finished, R2 was assisted to bed and was in bed at 1:00pm. R2 was positioned on turned to the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician and failed to follow the facility's policy for medication administration. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for improper nursing care in the sample of 3. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 left the facility AMA (Against Medical Advice) on December 31, 2023. R1 had multiple diagnoses including periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right knee joint, fracture of right tibia, bronchitis, sleep apnea, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and heart disease. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated December 19, 2023 shows R1 was cognitively intact. R1 was able to eat with set up assistance, required partial/moderate assistance with oral hygiene, personal hygiene, and bed mobility, and substantial/maximal assistance with toilet hygiene, showering and dressing. R1 was occasionally incontinent of urine,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident would be free from accident/hazards. This applies to 1 of 3 resident (R1) reviewed for accidents/hazards. The findings include: The facility's 12/21/23 Final Incident Report showed that R1 complained of pulsating right index finger pain on 12/11/23 that happened during mealtime. The Report showed the time the incident was reported was 12 noon. The Report then showed on 12/13/23, R1's right index finger was observed with increased swelling, redness/dicoloration and her MD ordered a hospital evaluation. The Report showed R1 returned from the hospital the same day, and per hospital report, resident with superficial burn of right index finger and she was to continue with her oral antibiotic. On 12/29/23 at 10:15 AM R1 was in her room, alert and in a wheelchair. R1 said she burned her right pointer finger (index finger) on a meal plate that was too hot but could not remember the date when the incident occurred. R1 said the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 9. R24 has multiple diagnoses which includes encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbation, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and type 2 diabetes mellitus, based on the face sheet. R24's admission MDS (minimum data set) dated May 1, 2023 shows that the resident is cognitively intact and requires extensive assistance with most of her ADLs (activities of daily living), including personal hygiene. On May 8, 2023 at 10:27 AM, R24 was in bed, alert, oriented and verbally responsive. R24 was observed with accumulation of facial hair on her chin area. R24 stated that she wants the staff to shave her chin hair. V10 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) was present during the observation and was aware of R24's request to be shaven. R24's active care plan effective since April 22, 2023 shows that the resident requires assistance with personal hygiene. During separate interviews held on May 10, 2023 which started at 11:53 AM, V3 (Director of Nursing) and V4 (Assistant Director of Nursing) both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were not left exposed while in bed during the provision of incontinence care. The facility also failed to ensure that urinary catheter drainage bags are covered. This applies to 3 of 20 residents (R50, R192 and R193) reviewed for privacy in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1. R50 has multiple diagnoses which includes hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, dementia without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, primary open-angle glaucoma (bilateral), and muscle wasting and atrophy, based on the face sheet. R50's annual MDS (minimum data set) dated April 2, 2023 shows that the resident is moderately impaired with regards to cognitive skills for daily decision making and requires extensive assistance from the staff with most of his ADLs (activities of daily living) including bed mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. The same MDS shows that R50 is always incontinent of bladder function and occasionally incontinent of bowel function. On April 8, 2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to discontinue and intervene when a resident began to exhibit signs of coughing, throat clearing and increased secretions while being fed. The facility also failed to provide feeding supervision to a resident requiring supervision during eating. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R33 and R39) reviewed for aspiration precautions in a sample of 20. The findings include: 1. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 5/5/23, shows R33's cognition was severely impaired. Physician note, dated 5/4/23, shows R33's diagnosis included dysphagia/possible aspiration with food and dementia. The note shows R33 was evaluated after possible aspiration and coughing while eating lunch. Speech therapy and a pulmonary evaluation were ordered and a chest x-ray was performed. The note shows R33 required close monitoring. Nursing note, dated 5/4/23, shows R33's diet was downgraded from regular texture/thin liquids to mechanical soft/nectar thick liquids. Physician note, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the catheter tube and bag were not touching the floor and not positioned over the bladder. The facility also failed to provide urinary catheter care and failed to secured the catheter to the resident. This applies to 3 of the 4 residents (R53, R192, R193) observed for urinary catheter care in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1. Face sheet shows that R193 is 85 years-old, who has multiple medical diagnoses which include benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). On 5/08/23 at 12:30 PM, R193 was in the dining room sitting in his wheelchair with indwelling urinary catheter bag directly touching the floor. On 5/10/23 at 1:33 PM, V38, V39, V40, and V42 (All Certified Nursing Assistants/CNA) transferred R193 via mechanical lift from wheelchair to the bed. V42 placed the catheter bag on the floor while they were attaching the sling of the mechanical lift. As R193 was being lifter up by the mechanical lift from the wheelchair, V40 took the urinary bag from the floor and held it higher than R193's bladder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow physician's order with regards to administration of continuous oxygen via nasal cannula. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R11) reviewed for oxygen therapy in the sample of 20. The findings include: R11 has multiple diagnoses which includes chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, persistent atrial fibrillation, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, pleural effusion and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), based on the face sheet. R11's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated April 25, 2023 shows that the resident is moderately impaired with cognition and requires extensive assistance from the staff with most of her ADLs (activities of daily living). R11's active physician's order showed an order dated April 27, 2023 for, continuous oxygen at 3 liter per minute via nasal cannula every day. On May 8, 2023 at 10:26 AM, R11 was in bed, alert and verbally responsive. R11 was observed with shortness of breath. R11 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 4 liters per minute using an oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician. There were 25 opportunities with 6 errors resulting in a 24% error rate. This applies to 2 of 7 residents (R193 and R391) in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1. The Physician order sheet (POS) shows R391 has diagnoses that includes acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation and seasonal allergies. On May 9, 2023 at 9:01 AM during medication administration observation of R391, V21 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) prepared and administered multiple oral medications. V21 (LPN) stated she is not giving two anticoagulant medications due to a physician order to hold for three days. V21 did not mention any medication that would not be given because of unavailability. Upon reconciliation of medication administration, V21 had not administered Azelastine 0.1% nasal spray scheduled to be given twice a day (9:00 AM and 9:00 PM) and Metamucil 3.4 grams oral powder scheduled to be given twice a day (9:00 AM and 5:00 PM).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve 2 Gram Sodium diets as ordered/planned to residents who had physician orders for the therapeutic diets. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R27, R11 and R9) reviewed for therapeutic diets. The findings include: Facility Client List Report, dated 5/9/23, shows R27, R11 and R9 all had physician diet orders which included two gram sodium diet. Facility Daily Spread Sheet Week Three Monday, undated, shows residents with a 2 gram sodium diet order were to be offered/served either baked fish or roasted turkey on a bun. The Spread Sheet showed residents receiving general diets were to be offered stuffed shells with tomato sauce or bratwurst. 1. Face sheet, dated 5/9/23, shows R27's diagnoses included dementia, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, and essential hypertension. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 3/27/23, shows R27's cognition was severely impaired. On 05/08/23 at 11:45 AM during meal service, R27 received two cheese-stuffed shells with tomato sauce as her entree for lunch. R27's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident for self-administration of medications and obtain physician orders for resident medication to be at the bedside. This applies to 1of 1residents (R8) reviewed for medications in the sample of 29. Findings include: On 8/9/22 at 12:15 PM, in R8's room, there were 3 cups of medication stacked in each other on R8's bedside table. The medication cups had 4 round unlabeled medications. R8 said the nurse left medications for her to take earlier, but she was falling asleep, so she did not take the medications. On 8/9/22 at 12:58 PM, V4 (Agency Nurse) said R8 only gets Aspirin and Lisinopril in the morning. V4 said R8 told her she would take her medications after eating and R8 has no issues with taking her medications. V4 said I just come back to make sure she takes it, R8 takes her medications when she wants to. V4 said she does not usually leave resident's medications at the bedside; she makes sure they take their medications. On 8/9/22 at 1:28 PM, V1 (Administrator) said, we do not have anyone on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively communicate with 2 out of 2 residents (R46 and R31) that do not speak or understand English, in a sample of 29. The findings include: 1. On 8/10/22 at 11:34am R46, a Chinese speaking only person, was in her room with V7 (Wound Doctor) and V5 (Wound Nurse). R46 was receiving wound care to a wound to the left side of her face. V5 said that R46 received 2 Tylenol extra strength at 10am for pain. V5 said that R46 speaks English and when V5 asked R46 twice was she in pain she nodded her head yes. V5 said that she doesn't know if R46 understood her, but she didn't believe she was in pain. V5 then called V13, R46's daughter, who asked her mother if she was in pain and according to V13 R46 denied pain. Then after the phone call V5 began wound care and asked R46 to turn her head to the right. She asked this of her twice and R46 did not do what was asked and showed a look of confusion on her face. Then R46 stood up and turned toward her right. V5 touched her and gestured to sit down and began cleaning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line care and Midline care by not measuring the length of the external catheter and upper arm circumference upon admission. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R148 and R151) reviewed for intravenous access site care in a sample of 29. Findings include: 1. R151 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. On 8/9/22 at 12:36 PM, R151 was observed with a left upper arm PICC line with a dressing dated 8/3/22. Record review on Administration Documentation History Detail Report (ADHDR) for R151 documents that the facility didn't measure the length of the external catheter (PICC) and upper arm circumference upon admission on [DATE] (initially measured on 8/9/22). On 8/9/22 at 1:52 PM, V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing - ADON) stated, We are supposed to measure the length of the external catheter (PICC) and upper arm circumference upon admission. We didn't have the PICC line dressing change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to manage residents' pain during wound treatment for 2 of 2 residents (R46 and R53) reviewed for pain in the sample of 29. Findings include: 1. On 8/10/22 at 11:13 AM V5 (Wound Care Nurse) gathered supplies for the wound dressing change, performed hand hygiene, don gloves and informed R53 of the dressing change. V6 CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) had positioned R53 to her right side. V5 proceeded with the wound treatment to R53's sacral wound. While V5 was cleaning the wound, V6 asked if R53 was in pain, R53 said she was in pain and said ouch. V5 said I'm sorry, but continued to clean the wound. After that, V5 began applying treatment to R53's wound, V5 asked R53 was if she was fine or if she should wait before continuing the treatment. R53 said you can wait. V5 waited about 5 seconds and continued to apply treatment and completed the treatment. V5 and V6 repositioned R53; V5 gathered her supplies and garbage and washed her hands. V5 did not address or offer R53 pain medication during the wound treatment. On 8/10/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to follow the ordered food preferences regarding food choices for 1 of 29 residents (R196) reviewed for diets. Findings include: R196 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R196's diagnoses included but were not limited to sepsis, osteomyelitis left heals and foot, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension. On 08/09/2022 at approximately 11:45 AM, during an initial tour of the facility, R196 was observed sitting in his room alert, oriented, and interviewable. R196 was eating pasta, and his meal tray was on his side table with mashed potatoes, gravy and a salad. R196 said he is a vegetarian and the mashed potatoes has a gravy that has meat in it. R196 said he had eaten a tomato sandwich without realizing it had meat in it. R196 said he tried to remove the meat part and eat it. However, R196 said he doesn't like the meat smell. R196 said he had been here only for a week, but has had meat served…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to serve food in a sanitary condition for 1 of 1 residents in a sample of 29. The findings include: On 8/9/22 at 12:30pm R41 was in his room with his lunch tray on his bedside table and his urinal, with a clear liquid in the urinal, was laying on its side next to the lunch tray. No food had been touched. On 8/9/22 at 12:30pm V10 CNA (Certified Nurse's Assistant) said I shouldn't have put his lunch tray down on his bed side table with his used urinal next to it because it is cross contamination and can cause infections. On 8/9/22 at 1:43 pm V2 - ADON (Assistant Director of Nurses) said, The lunch tray should not have been put on the table next to the urinal, because of infection control. The facility's Use of Bedpans, Urinals & Basins, no date, showed under Procedure 1. All bedpans and urinals will be stored in the drawer inside the washroom when not in use.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0916 — patternEnsure each resident has a room at or above ground level.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rooms were located at or above ground level. This applies to 25 residents (R65, R59, R2, R55, R44, R81, R54, R52, R74, R18, R17, R26, R68, R67, R7, R33, R10, R51, R36, R40, R24, R61, R82, R50, and R354) reviewed for facility environment. The findings include: On 7/16/2024 at 10:32 AM during the initial tour of the facility, 25 residents (R65, R59, R2, R55, R44, R81, R54, R52, R74, R18, R17, R26, R68, R67, R7, R33, R10, R51, R36, R40, R24, R61, R82, R50, and R354) were observed residing on the lower-level floor in rooms located below ground level. The facility's Resident Roster report dated 7/16/2024 showed R65, R59, R2, R55, R44, R81, R54, R52, R74, R18, R17, R26, R68, R67, R7, R33, R10, R51, R36, R40, R24, R61, R82, R50, and R354 were all residing in rooms on the lower floor below ground level. On 7/16/2024 at 10:24 AM, V14 (Regional Administrator) said she was aware of the facility's noncompliance with having residents residing in rooms below grade level on the lower-level floor. V14 said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0916 — patternEnsure each resident has a room at or above ground level.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that all resident rooms in the lower level (Gardenview Units) are located at or above grade level. This affects 19 of 19 residents (R3, R4, R5, R15, R25, R27, R33, R34, R37, R40, R41, R46, R47, R55, R56, R60, R63, R68, R242) reviewed for rooms below grade level in sample of 20. The findings include: On May 10, 2023 during a tour of the unit for the annual survey, 13 rooms (100 - 112, 114) in the lower level residential nursing care unit, were observed to be below the surrounding ground level . There were 19 residents living residing in this unit (R3, R4 R5, R15, R25, R27, R33, R34, R37, R40, R41, R46, R47, R55, R56, R60, R63, R68, R242). Lighting in the lower level residential unit was sufficient. Daylight is provided through windows in the dining room and all resident rooms had at least one window which provides daylight. No resident or family member made any complaint about their room being below the grade level during the annual survey. On May 10, 2023 at 1:35 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated that there were no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0916 — patternEnsure each resident has a room at or above ground level.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that all resident rooms in the lower level Gardenview Units are located at or above grade level. This affects 21 out of 21 residents (R6, R58, R10, R85, R43, R31, R34, R29, R42, R48, R81, R47, R24, R61, R28, R41, R245, R46, R37, R7 & R27) reviewed for rooms below grade level out of a sample of 29. Findings include: On 8/9/22 during the screening process of the annual survey, 14 resident rooms (100-114) in the Gardenview Unit were observed to be below the surrounding ground level. There were 21 residents living in this unit (R6, R58, R10, R85, R43, R31, R34, R29, R42, R48, R81, R47, R24, R61, R28, R41, R245, R46, R37, R7 & R27) Lighting in the Gardenview unit is sufficient. Daylight is provided through windows in the dining room and all resident rooms have at least 1 window which is operational, and which provides daylight. No resident or family member made any complaint about their Gardenview room during the annual survey. On 8/11/22 at 11:58 AM, V1 (Administrator) denied receiving any complaints about the Gardenview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$76,863 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $8,788 — penalty dated 2025-12-14
- $28,782 — penalty dated 2025-08-06
- $39,293 — penalty dated 2024-07-19
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-09 for 6 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to APERION CARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 1.6 | +2.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APERION CARE EXEC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 15% | since 01/01/2024 |
| LAN 3 INVESTOR GROUP LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 01/01/2024 |
| GOLDFARB, BRIAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| ULBERT, LISA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| JUDE, JODIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| KASSEL, DIANA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| APERION CARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| DAMICO, JEFF | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| TARR, ALEXANDER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| BERKOWITZ, DAVID | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/22/2025 |
| HOFFMAN, JOSHUA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/22/2025 |
| MEYSTEL, YOSEF | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/22/2025 |
| 2013 MIDWEST ROAD, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/17/2025 |
| APERION CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| DAVID A BERKOWITZ DELTA TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| JOSHUA HOFFMAN TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| YOSEF MEYSTEL DELTA TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $5.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145458. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.