Aperion Care West Chicago
201 West North Avenue, West Chicago, IL 60185 · For profit - Corporation · 213 certified beds · (630) 876-8100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (20% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $289,723 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-31)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.3% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 100.0% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.8% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 39.9% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.5% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.3% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 87.1% | 21.7% | 17.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 56.5% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.8% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.3% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.00 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.94 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 13.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 6.1–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 13.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 7.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 2.9–17.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 213 beds and averages 209.3 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 1.69 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 0.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 1.78 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
55 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was supervised to prevent the resident from leaving the grounds of the facility, and failed to ensure nursing staff were aware R1 was out of the building resulting in a 6 hour delay in identifying R1 was missing. This failure resulted in R1 leaving the facility grounds at 5:57 PM on [DATE], and being found deceased about 600 feet from the facility's main entrance at 7:50AM on [DATE]. The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] when R1 signed out of the facility, left unsupervised, and failed to return at the expected time. The receptionist failed to notify the nurse R1 had not returned to the facility by the 8:00 PM curfew and nursing staff was therefore unaware R1 was not in the facility until after 11:00 PM, when police were finally notified. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 2:30 PM. The surveyor confirmed by interview and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed, and the deficient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to reassess and update R1's capacity for sexual consent after a significant decline in her cognition, failed to timely report an incident of sexual abuse as per facility guidance This failure resulted in the sexually inappropriate behavior between R1 and R2 in a public area. R1 is not able to consent to sexual activity due to her severe impairment in cognition and diagnosis of Dementia, and a reasonable person would not want to perform sexual acts without consent. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for sexual assault in the sample of 5. The Immediate Jeopardy began on June 25, 2024, when the facility failed to update the Capacity for Sexual Consent form when R1 was assessed to be severely impaired in cognition, and therefore unable to consent to sexual activity. V1, Administrator, and V2, Director of Nursing, were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on July 15, 2024 at 10:37 AM. The surveyor confirmed by interview and record review that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required supervision and safe swallowing strategies while eating was provided supervision while eating. This failure resulted in R1 eating alone in her room and experiencing a choking incident requiring the Heimlich maneuver and CPR (Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation). R1was transported via emergency response and expired. The facility also failed to have a system in place to identify residents who require supervision with eating and ensure Speech Therapy recommendations are implemented. This applies to 48 of 48 residents (R1, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R11-R51) reviewed for supervision while eating in the sample of 51. The Immediate Jeopardy began on January 18, 2024 when V12 (BA-Behavioral Aide) served a meal tray to R1 in her room, and left R1 unattended with the meal tray. R1 was later found unresponsive in her room by facility staff. R1 was transported to the local hospital and expired at the hospital on January 18,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from mental and physical abuse by a facility resident. This failure resulted in R4 experiencing psychosocial harm including flashbacks of prior abuse, sadness/crying, panic, fear of individuals walking into her room, and shame.This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R4) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 4. The findings include:Care plan, provided 6/17/26, showed R4's diagnoses included major depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, depression, dissociative and conversion disorder, The care plan showed R4 was at risk for abuse due to a history of abuse, poor insight and judgement. The care plan showed R4 was at risk for suicidal issues and had a history of voicing suicidal thoughts and/or intentions and had a history of a suicide attempt.MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 4/6/26, showed R4's cognition was intact.Facility Final Abuse Investigation Report, dated 6/9/26, showed, On 6/3/26 resident [R4] reported that at times while interacting with peer resident [R3] he would sometimes take hold of her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from resident-to-resident physical abuse. This failure resulted in a resident experiencing severe shoulder pain with a possible fracture, and subsequent psychosocial harm. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R131) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 38. The findings include: R131's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicated that progress notes, dated 1/18/2026, documents at approximately 10:15 PM, R131 was suddenly attacked by another male resident (R200) without provocation when R200 attempted to place his arm around R131's neck. V9 (RN) documented that he and another resident (R37) intervened and were able to separate the two residents, and that R200 stated, I'm not on for the 3rd floor (secure unit), adding, I'm here for murder, which was also heard by R131. On 1/20/2026 at 6:11 AM, V12 (LPN) documented that R131 reported 8/10 left shoulder pain, for which PRN Acetaminophen-Codeine was administered;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect when the facility failed to provide services to support safe eating environment for R1 who was identified to need direct supervision and safe swallowing strategies to prevent choking and aspiration. The facility neglected to develop and implement a care plan with interventions for R1 to include the recommended eating plan and the facility neglected to train direct care staff on the services R1 needed to prevent aspiration. The facility also neglected to have a system in place to identify other residents with eating and swallowing precautions and train direct care staff on monitoring and supervising these residents and following speech therapy recommendations. As a result, R1 was served a meal tray in her room without supervision by an untrained staff member, aspirated and later expired. This applies to 1 of 48 residents (R1) reviewed for supervision while eating in the sample of 51. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse. This failure resulted in R108 receiving sutures after R304 hit him in the face two times. This applies to 2 of 35 residents (R108 & R304) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. R304's care plan, date initiated 8/24/23, shows, Focus: I am/have the potential to be physically aggressive. AEB (as evidenced by) I Punched a fellow resident in the face on December 23, 2023 r/t (related to) dx of other schizophrenia, generalized anxiety disorder, and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. Interventions: .12/23/2023- res punched another resident after going into res room to hug them and fellow res punched them. Res punched res back cutting them on the face . R108's nursing progress note, dated 12/23/23, shows, Call light activated and aide went to room to check on the light. Resident was at the doorway bleeding from a 2-3 inch laceration on his left eyebrow and ½ inch on middle of forehead . Resident stated that co-peer (R304) hit him twice.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to report resident allegations of abuse.This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R4) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 4.The findings include:Care plan, provided 6/17/26, showed R4's diagnoses included major depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, depression, dissociative and conversion disorder. The care plan showed R4 was at risk for abuse due to a history of abuse, poor insight and judgement. The care plan showed R4 was at risk for suicidal issues and had a history of voicing suicidal thoughts and/or intentions and had a history of a suicide attempt.MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 4/6/26, showed R4's cognition was intact.On 6/17/26 at 2:45 PM with V7 (Social Services) present, R4 and V7 both stated between 6/3/26 and 6/8/26, they reported allegations R3 hit R4's hand, slapped R4's face, opened an umbrella toward R4's forehead hitting R4, was verbally abusive to R4, and bent R4's friend's fingers backward to V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Administrator in Training). V7 stated R4 demonstrated to V1 how R3 hit R4's hand to V1 and V2 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to investigate resident allegations of abuse.This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R4) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 4.The findings include:Care plan, provided 6/17/26, showed R4's diagnoses included major depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, depression, dissociative and conversion disorder. The care plan showed R4 was at risk for abuse due to a history of abuse, poor insight and judgement. The care plan showed R4 was at risk for suicidal issues and had a history of voicing suicidal thoughts and/or intentions and had a history of a suicide attempt.MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 4/6/26, showed R4's cognition was intact.On 6/17/26 at 2:45 PM with V7 (Social Services) present, R4 and V7 both stated between 6/3/26 and 6/8/26, they reported the following allegations to V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Administrator in Training): R3 hit R4's hand, slapped R4's face, opened an umbrella toward R4's forehead hitting R4, R3 was verbally abusive to R4, and R3 bent R4's friends fingers backward. V7 stated R4 demonstrated to V1 how R3 hit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep residents free from verbal and mental abuse. This failure applies to 2 of 6 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 8 residents. The findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses that include a single episode of major depressive disorder, alcohol dependence in remission, insomnia, and peripheral vascular disease. R1's current care plan-initiated September 12, 2025, shows he has a history of verbal aggression and poor impulse control. R2's EMR shows R2 is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses that include anxiety disorder and problems related to social environment. On May 26, 2026, at 11:10 AM, R2 said there was altercation between him and R1 on May 14, 2026, at approximately 8:00 AM, in the dining room. R2 said R1 was teasing R5. He was making fun of his name by mispronouncing it. R2 said he could see that R5 was getting upset, so R2 asked R1 to stop it and pronounce his name…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an incident of abuse to the State Agency. This failure applies to 2 of 6 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 8 residents. The findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses that included a single episode of major depressive disorder, alcohol dependence in remission, insomnia, and peripheral vascular disease who was admitted to the facility August 1, 2025. R1's current care plan-initiated September 12, 2025, shows he has a history of verbal aggression and poor impulse control. R2's EMR shows R2 is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder and problems related to social environment who was admitted to the facility March 28, 2024. On May 26, 2026, at 11:10 AM, R2 said on May 14, 2026, at approximately 8:00 AM while in the dining room, R1 was teasing R5 by mispronouncing his name. R2 said you could see it was bothering R5, so R2 said he asked R1 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to investigate an incident of verbal and mental abuse. This failure applies to 2 of 6 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 8.The findings include:R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses that included a single episode of major depressive disorder, alcohol dependence in remission, insomnia, and peripheral vascular disease who was admitted to the facility August 1, 2025.R1's current care plan-initiated September 12, 2025, shows he has a history of verbal aggression and poor impulse control.R2's EMR shows R2 is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder and problems related to social environment who was admitted to the facility March 28, 2024.On May 26, 2026, at 2:25 PM, V5 (Restorative Aide) said on May 14, 2026, he was sitting at a table with R1 in the dining area, facing and talking with R1. R2 was sitting at another table behind him when V5 said suddenly R1 stood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve meals at palatable temperatures.This applies to all residents who receive food from the kitchen.The findings include:The CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) shows the survey start date of 1/27/26 and a resident census of 211. On 01/30/2026 at 2:39 PM, V2, DON (Director of Nursing), confirmed all residents residing in the facility at the time of survey start on 01/27/26 receive services from the Dietary department.On 01/27/2026 at 12:19 PM during the dining observation, R118 stated the food isn't always served to them while it is hot.R207 stated the food served is usually barely warm.R100 stated the meals are usually not served hot.On 01/27/2026 at 12:51 PM, R40 stated the food isn't usually served hot. R40 stated she will request staff to reheat her food, but she is told they can't reheat if for her. R40 stated staff will not get her a new tray from the kitchen, so she must eat it cold.On 01/28/2026 at 12:23 PM, food holding temperatures were done with V4, Dietary Director and V39 Cook. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store refrigerated resident food safely in the refrigerators on the units. This has the potential to apply to all 211 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:On 01/29/2026 at 2:59 PM, the second-floor small refrigerator (identified by V32 and V33 CNAs [Certified Nursing Assistants] as the supplement refrigerator) had no thermometer or temperature log. The supplement refrigerator contained:An opened 20 oz (Ounce) bottle of colaTwo opened cans of citrus sodaa clear plastic bag containing a bun wrapped in a paper towel with white crystal powdered substancea green apple with two brown bite marks wrapped in paper towels.A small plastic cup with vanilla pudding covered in plastic wrap without any dates or label.A 32oz (Ounce) carton of nutritional supplement without an open on or use by date.The larger refrigerator (identified by V32 and V33 as a staff and resident shared refrigerator) had no thermometer or temperature log. The refrigerator contained:A 15.4 oz cup of homestyle chicken noodle soup expired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer and record individualized supplemental nutritional interventions for residents being treated for weight loss. This applies to 4 of 4 (R51, R8, R10, and R121) residents reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 38.The findings include:1. On 1/27/2026 at 10:10 AM, R51 was in bed and unable to recall if he had eaten breakfast. R51 was thin and frail. At 11:50 AM, V37 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) said R51 skipped breakfast, and she was now going to inform the nurse.On 1/28/2026 at 9 AM, V38 (CNA) said she supervised R51 for breakfast, and he only ate his served scrambled eggs, which was approximately less than 50% of his meal.On 1/29/2026 at 8:35 AM, R51 was in bed, sleeping. R51 was fatigued and unsure if he had eaten breakfast. V32 (CNA) said R51 did not eat breakfast and had a history of refusing meals. V32 said she informed V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN). On 1/29/2026 at 8:40 AM, V18 (LPN) said R51 received an ordered nutritional supplement for his nutrition management. V18 said she administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor, identify, and document side effects of medications, and failed to monitor for the therapeutic blood level of a medication.This applies to 4 of 5 (R82, R93, R182, and R51) residents reviewed for medications in a sample of 38.The findings include:1. R82 was admitted to facility on 11/13/23. Diagnoses include anxiety disorder, psychosis, schizophrenia, depression and extrapyramidal and movement disorder. R82's MDS (Minimum Data Sheet) dated 12/22/25 documents that he has intact cognitive functions.On 1/27/26 at 10:54 AM, 1/28/26 at 9:24 AM and 10/29/26 at 9:30 AM, R82 was observed drooling excessively while talking. He was observed constantly wiping his mouth and there were moisture marks on his shirt below his mouth. He said he cannot control it and feels embarrassed by his drooling.R82's POS (Physician Order Sheet) documents R82 was receiving Clozapine 50 mg, three tablets by mouth in the morning and Clozapine 50 mg, five tablets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-31 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have thermometers, keep temperature logs, remove expired items, and maintain resident refrigerators. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R66, R118, R119, R168, R207) reviewed for refrigerators in a sample of 38.The findings include:1.On 1/27/26 at 11:05 AM, R119's refrigerator did not have a thermometer inside. R119 was not in her room. R119's roommate stated the staff was supposed to bring a thermometer, but they never did.2.On 1/27/26 at 11:19 AM, R207's refrigerator did not have a thermometer inside. Inside, there was a package of chicken salad and container of apple sauce. R207 said she's never seen a thermometer inside her fridge.3.On 1/27/26 at 11:22 AM, R168's refrigerator had ice built up in her freezer and the door's hinge was broken, causing difficulty in opening and closing it. R168 stated it has been like that for some time. She told staff, but nobody came to fix it.4.On 1/27/26 at 11:41 AM, R118's refrigerator had no thermometer inside. Inside, there was a 1/2 pint of 2% milk with a best by date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-31 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light system was working in resident rooms. This applies to 28 of 28 (R102, R6, R156, R103, R77, R47, R202, R4, R206, R13, R209, R171, R96, R108, R177, R52, R24, R25, R31, R44, R8, R19, R109, R183, R10, R90, R113, and R210) residents reviewed for call lights.On 1/27/2026 at 10:05 AM, R113 was in bed. R113 said he was extremely upset because his call light had not worked since yesterday. R113 said the facility reported they fixed the call system problem, but it frequently continued to malfunction, causing the call lights for his entire hall to stop working for extended periods of time. R113 pressed his call light, but it was not sending a call signal outside his door and to the nurses' station main panel. R113 said it was very upsetting because he had no way of getting assistance with his care needs and for emergency situations. R113's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 11/17/2025, said he was cognitively intact and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's wishes to have food warmed in a microwave at their preferred time.This applies to 1 resident (R37) reviewed for accommodation of needs.On 01/27/2026 at 12:43 PM, R37 stated there use to be a microwave available for residents' use, but it was taken away. The only microwave available is at the nursing station and is not accessible to the residents. R37 stated if residents want any food reheated, they must request the facility staff do it for them, but the time for reheating food is limited. If he wants any food reheated after 9:30 PM, staff will not heat his food. On 01/28/2026 at 4:10 PM, V8 RN (Registered Nurse) stated residents are not allowed behind the nursing station to use the microwave. Staff will reheat food for residents, but only during the posted specified times (8:30 AM to 9:30 AM, and 8:45 PM to 9:15 PM). V8 stated it's to prevent the residents from interrupting staff while they are working and because the residents need to go to sleep at night. V8 stated if there isn't a cut…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-31 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify abuse, investigate an incident of resident-to-resident abuse, implement interventions to prevent further recurrence, and report the incident. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R131 and R200) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 38. The findings include: On 1/27/2026 at 10:37 AM, R131 was observed sitting in bed, holding his left shoulder and wincing in pain. R131 stated he was experiencing severe left shoulder pain that began on 1/18/2026 when he was physically attacked by R200. According to R131, R200 suddenly charged at him, grabbed him, and placed both arms around his upper torso, putting him in a headlock. On 1/28/2026 at 3:12 PM, V1 (Administrator/Abuse Coordinator) stated he had reviewed the facility's security camera footage from 1/18/2026 and confirmed he was made aware of the incident that night. V1 described the footage showed R200 approaching R131 from behind and placing both arms around his upper torso. V1 stated he did not report the incident to the Illinois Department of Public Health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of physical abuse between 2 residents. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R131 and R200) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 38. The findings include: On 1/27/2026 at 10:37 AM, R131 was observed sitting in bed, holding his left shoulder and wincing in pain. R131 stated he was experiencing severe left shoulder pain that began on 1/18/2026 when he was physically attacked by R200. According to R131, R200 suddenly charged at him, grabbed him, and placed both arms around his upper torso, putting him in a headlock. On 1/28/2026 at 3:12 PM, V1 (Administrator/Abuse Coordinator) stated he reviewed security camera footage from 1/18/2026 and confirmed awareness of the incident that night. V1 stated he did not report the incident to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) at that time because he did not believe it met the definition of abuse, reasoning there was no serious injury, bodily harm, or psychosocial effects. V1 further acknowledged the incident was not reported to IDPH until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-31 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain assessment and management was provided for a resident's new onset of pain. This applies to 1of 1 resident (R131) reviewed for pain management in a sample of 38. The findings include: On 1/27/2026 at 10:37 AM, R131 was observed sitting in bed holding his left shoulder and wincing in pain. R131 reported his shoulder pain began ten days earlier on 1/18/2026 following a physical altercation with another resident. R131 described his left shoulder pain as severe, rating it 8-10/10, with 10 being the worst pain he has ever experienced. R131 stated his current pain medication was not relieving his left shoulder pain and he had been requesting an X-ray and transfer to the hospital to have the injury evaluated. Review of R131's N Adv - Long Term Care Evaluation documented a pain level of 8, categorizing it as severe, with indicators including vocal complaints of left anterior shoulder pain and facial expressions consistent with pain. The assessment identified this as a new issue and further documented the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-31 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide physical therapy that was ordered by the physician.This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R151) reviewed for rehab services in a sample of 38. Findings Include:R151's diagnosis list includes Parkinsonism, idiopathic progressive neuropathy, recurrent major depressive disorder, and drug-induced subacute dyskinesia.R151's current care plan includes limited range of motion in bilateral upper and lower extremities related to pain and limited mobility; interventions include to demonstrate exercises and have resident return-demonstrate the exercises.On 01/27/2026 at 11:02 AM, R151 stated for two years he's had numbness and tingling in both legs and his fingers. R151 stated his Neurologist wrote orders for him to have PT (Physical Therapy) that was never set up for him. R151 stated he provides his after-visit summary from his doctor's office visit to the floor nurse on duty and to V29, Scheduler.On 01/28/2026 at 2:59 PM, V8, RN (Registered Nurse), stated R151 had not recently received any physical therapy services.On 01/28/2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain hot water temperatures at a comfortable range for residents in bathrooms and showers. This applies to all 206 residents residing in the facility.The findings include:On December 16, 2025 at 10:30 AM, R3 said the water at the facility had been freezing for the last three weeks. R3 said he had a doctor's appointment earlier in the day and he had to take a freezing cold shower. R3 said a lot of residents had been complaining about the temperature and it was making the residents angry. R3 said it was the water everywhere in the building including the bathrooms and the showers. R3 said administration was not doing anything about it, based on what he could see. On December 16, 2025, the water was tested in the facility. At 11:12 AM, V3 (Maintenance Director) tested the hot water in a resident's bathroom sink, which showed it was 68 degrees. V3 said the hot water temperature should be between 102 to 110 degrees. V3 said he found out on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an abuse allegation. This applies to 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for reporting abuse allegations. The findings include:On October 17, 2025, multiple requests were made for abuse allegations for October 2025 to V1 (Administrator) and V2 (DON/Director of Nursing), with none provided. On October 17, 2025 at 1:50 PM, R1 said she was in pain a lot and it hurt her when she was changed, especially when V3 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) would change her. V3 said she told the staff she was in pain because she felt they pull and hurt her when they change her. R1 said when V3 changed her, she would lift her leg high up, and when she would say she was in pain, V3 would apologize. R1 said she told the nurse she did not want V3 to care for her anymore. The EHR (Electronic Health Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, major depressive disorder, seizures, persistent mood (affective) disorder, generalized osteoarthritis, contracture of the left hand and left ankle, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable, homelike environment for residents. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for inadequate cooling in the sample of 3. The findings include:Findings Include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including major depressive disorder, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and asthma. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated August 8, 2025, showed R1 was cognitively intact. R2's EMR showed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and major depressive disorder. R2's MDS, dated [DATE], showed R2 was cognitively intact. On August 18, 2025, at 11:24 AM, R1 and R2 were in their room. V3 (Maintenance Director) obtained temperatures of R1 and R2's room. V3's thermometer showed the room temperature was 77.5 degrees Fahrenheit, the humidity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-14 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolatedHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide visitation rights to 2 residents, both sisters, who reside at the facility.This applies to 2 of 6 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for right to receive visitors in the sample of 6.The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's diagnoses included but not limited to generalized anxiety, recurrent depressive disorder, schizophrenia, and suicidal ideation. The EMR also showed R1 has a twin sister (R2), who also resides in the facility. R1 resides on the third floor, a secured unit, and R2 resides on the first floor.R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated January 7, 2025, shows R1 is cognitively intact. The assessment also showed R1 had not exhibited behavior issues.R1's current care plan, dated February 23, 2018, showed R1 was at risk for depression. R1's care plan shows multiple interventions, including, encourage participation in activities of choice and interest, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R3) reviewed for resident-to-resident physical abuse. The findings include: The facility's 4/29/2025 Facility Reported Incident showed On 4/16/2025 resident [R2] had an altercation with her roommate [R1]. Staff immediately separated . On 5/01/2025 at 11:30 AM, R2 was in bed. R2 was confused and unable to be interviewed. R2's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed she had multiple diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, dementia with anxiety, and major depressive disorder. R2's MDS dated [DATE] showed R2 was cognitively impaired. R2's MDS also said she had symptoms of being short-tempered and easily annoyed nearly every day. R2's care plan initiated on 3/06/2018 documented, I have a hx (history) of becoming physically and verbally aggressive with my peers and staff due to my medications/treatment noncompliance, poor coping skills, and diagnosis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the facility Abuse Coordinator and the State Agency of an allegation of physical abuse. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for physical abuse in a sample of 4. The findings include: R3 is a [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE], having cognition intact as per the MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 4/7/25. On 4/22/25 at 12:30 PM, R3 stated, (R4) hit me on my head and face. But I don't remember the day exactly. It happened in my room, and nobody saw it. R2 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE], with cognition intact, as per the MDS, dated [DATE]. On 4/22/25 at 11:40 AM, R2 stated, One of the residents (R4) hit me on my head four times last week. I had a headache after that for two days. The incident happened in front of the nurse's station and (V7, Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) and (V8, CNA) witnessed the incident. I reported the incident directly to (V9, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Coordinator/PRSC) and (V10,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based of interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the the pharmacy was completing monthly MRR (Medication Regimen Review) for residents residing in the facility. The facility failed to provide documentation that showed residents identified as having irregularities on their monthly MRR were addressed by the physician. This applies to 4 of 5 residents (R54, R64, R70, R122) reviewed for monthly MRR (Medication Regimen Review) in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. R54's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, dysphasia, unspecified mental disorder due to a physiological condition, altered mental status, schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. R54's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated October 16, 2024, showed R54 had severe cognitive impairment. R54's Psych notes and Pharmacy notes were reviewed. R54's MRR (Medication Regimen Review) for February…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained while in the dining room during meal service. This applies to 1 of 2 (R70) residents reviewed for dignity in the sample of 35. R70's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R70 was [AGE] years old and had been admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R70 was admitted with multiple diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, generalized anxiety disorder, abnormal posture, and chronic peripheral venous insufficiency. R70's MDS (Minimum Data Set). dated October 21, 2024, showed R70 was cognitively intact, and required assistance with ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) including substantial assistance with bathing and supervision/touching assistance with dressing. R70's care plan. dated April 24, 2024, showed R70 needed supervision/touching assistance with both upper and lower body dressing. R70's care plan did not address any concern regarding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor R196's decision to observe a vegan diet. This applies to 1 of 1 residents (R196) reviewed for self determination in the sample 35. The findings include: MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated September 5, 2024, shows R196's cognition was intact. POS (Physician Order Sheet), printed December 4, 2024, shows R196's diagnoses included major depressive disorder, suicidal ideation, and personal history of suicidal behavior. The POS shows R196's diet order, ordered November 28, 2023, shows General diet, Regular texture, Regular consistency. The POS shows, Allergies: Dairy Products. On December 4, 2024 at 10:10 PM with V1 (Administrator) present, R196 stated she was upset she was made to drink milk because she had no other protein sources in the diet served to her by the facility. R196 stated she chose to be vegan over 20 years prior, and was vegan when she was admitted to the facility a year ago. R196 stated in March of 2024, she spoke with V6 (Corporate Dietitian) via teleconference with V1 (Administrator) present in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy regarding care and management of implanted central venous catheter to prevent infection. This applies to 1 of 1 (R26) reviewed for central venous catheter in the sample of 35. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows that R26, a [AGE] year-old with diagnoses that includes type 2 diabetes mellitus, foot ulcer, osteomyelitis, PVD (peripheral vascular disease), PD (Parkinson's Disease), and Schizophrenia. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated November 26,2024 showed that R26's cognition was intact with BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15/15. The assessment also showed that R26 was identified with no behavior. The POS (Physician Order Sheet) shows a physician order dated December 2,2024 for R26 to have antibiotic medication of Vancomycin HCl Intravenous Solution 2000 MG/400ML (Vancomycin HCl) to be administered intravenously via the implanted central venous catheter. The Vancomycin 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident assessment was documented upon return to the facility after dialysis. This applies to 1 of 1 (R109) residents reviewed for dialysis services in the sample of 35. R109's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R109 was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R109 had multiple diagnoses including end stage renal disease with dependence on hemodialysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified asthma, schizophrenia, unspecified, history of falling, and essential hypertension. R109's care plan, dated November 5, 2024, showed R109 receives hemodialysis at the local dialysis center on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. R109's care plan for dialysis was initiated on November 26, 2019, upon his admission to the facility. Review of R109's progress notes from November 1, 2024, through December 4, 2024, showed there was no documentation of a resident assessment upon return from dialysis. On December 4, 2024, at 1:30 PM,V2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were obtained from the pharmacy in a timely manner to prevent residents from missing medication doses as ordered by the physician. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R412) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 35. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R412 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including major depressive disorder, polycystic ovarian syndrome, Lyme disease, insomnia, and anxiety disorder. On December 2, 2024, at 10:18 AM, R412 said she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R412 continued to say she had not received her pregabalin since she was admitted to the facility. On December 3, 2024, at 12:25 PM, V9 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) said the facility did not have R412's pregabalin, and V9 did not administer R412's pregabalin morning dose. V9 said medications are usually delivered within 24 hours of a resident being admitted , but R412's pregabalin was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and follow a vegan and dairy free diet for a resident who adhered to a vegan diet and who was allergic to dairy. This applied 1 of 1 (R196) reviewed for vegan diet menus in the sample of 35. The findings include: POS (Physician Order Sheet), printed December 4, 2024, shows R196's diagnoses included major depressive disorder, suicidal ideations, and personal history of suicidal behavior. The POS shows R196's diet order, ordered 11/28/23, shows General diet, Regular texture, Regular consistency. The POS shows, Allergies: Dairy Products. On December 4, 2024 at 10:10 PM with V1 (Administrator) present, R196 stated she was upset she was made to drink milk because she had no other protein sources in the diet served to her by the facility. R196 stated she chose to be vegan over 20 years prior, and was vegan when she was admitted to the facility a year ago. R196 stated in March of 2024, she spoke with V6 (Corporate Dietitian) via teleconference with V1 (Administrator) present in V1's office. R196 stated they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to eliminate a known dairy allergen from a resident's diet at the facility. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R196) reviewed for food allergies in the sample of 35. The findings include: POS (Physician Order Sheet), printed December 4, 2024, shows R196's diagnoses included major depressive disorder, suicidal ideations, and personal history of suicidal behavior. The POS shows R196's diet order, ordered November 11, 2023, shows General diet, Regular texture, Regular consistency. The POS shows, Allergies: Dairy Products. R196's Care plan documents, I am allergic to dairy (Date initiated March 7, 2024). Ensure allergy is noted on MAR (Medication Administration Record), TAR (Treatment Administration Record), tray care and [NAME]. Notify nurse of allergic reaction symptoms, such as shortness of breath, rash, itching, swelling and redness. On December 2, 2024 at 11:30 AM, R196 had (lactose free) milk sitting on the dresser in room, and stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely report an incident of sexual abuse as per facility guidance shown in their policy and procedure for sexual abuse. This applies to 1 of 6 residents (R1) reviewed for sexual abuse in the sample of 10. The findings include: Facility Initial Reported Incident, dated July 11, 2024 at 10:49 AM, included as follows: Staff reported an interaction between R1 and R2 in the 3rd floor dining room on July 9, 2024 at approximately 7:00 PM. Staff intervened and separated both residents .Both residents stated that the interaction was consensual. Facility will conduct a thorough investigation . R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Records) included nursing progress notes, dated July 9, 2024 at 6:45 PM, included R1's behavior noted at that shift was socially inappropriate with R1 being sexually inappropriate with co-peer R2 in the dining room. On July 11, 2024 at 11:00 AM, R5 stated she was in the dining room and saw R1 and R2 in the corner, Doing something they should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly conduct a thorough investigation of an incident of sexual abuse. This applies to 1 of 6 residents (R1) reviewed for sexual abuse in the sample of 10. The findings include: Facility census, dated July 9, 2024, showed R1-R6 reside on the secure behavioral unit of the facility. Facility provided information R3 and R4 are unable to provide sexual consent. Facility Initial Reported Incident, dated July 11, 2024 at 10:49 AM, included as follows: Staff reported an interaction between R1 and R2 in the 3rd floor dining room on July 9, 2024 at approximately 7:00 PM. Staff intervened and separated both residents .Both residents stated that the interaction was consensual. Facility will conduct a thorough investigation . R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Records) included nursing progress notes, dated July 9, 2024 at 6:45 PM, included R1's behavior noted at that shift was socially inappropriate, with R1 being sexually inappropriate with co-peer R2 in the dining room. On July 11, 2024 at 11:00 AM, R5 stated she was in the dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update and revise a care plan after a resident's change in cognitive status and inability to consent to sexual activity. This applies to 1 of 6 residents (R1) reviewed for sexual abuse in the sample of 10. The findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Records) showed R1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, Schizoaffective disorder, depressive type, need for assistance with personal care, mood disturbance, and anxiety, mixed obsessional thoughts and acts, and difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified, other lack of coordination. R1's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated June 25, 2024, showed R1 was severely impaired in cognition. R1's care plan, initiated April 23, 2024, included R1 is able to exercise the right to engage in a sexual/intimate relationship and has received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to be free from acts of physical abuse by their peers. This included 10 of 10 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10) reviewed for abuse. The findings included: On June 18, 2024 at 9:10 AM, V1 (Administrator) was asked to provide a list of physical altercations. V1 provided a list of Abuse Reportables. The list provided did not include the incident with R1 and R2. V1 was asked to provide any information he had on an incident that occurred on April 23, 2024. V1 said he has a list in his office of incidents he did not report because he said the direction he was given was if the incident did not cause emotional distress or physical injury, the incident did not need to be reported to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health). V1 later stated this directive came from corporate. At 1:42 PM, record review showed 10 residents had been involved in physical altercations with a peer and incidents were not reported to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) Regional Office within two hours of the notification of the allegation of abuse. This applies to 10 of 10 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10) reviewed for allegations of abuse. The findings included: On June 17, 2024 at 10:25 AM, V1 (Administrator) said he was given the directive that if an allegation of abuse did not cause emotional distress or physical injury, then the allegation did not need to be reported to IDPH. V1 said this directive came from the facility's corporation. On June 17, 2024 at 3:00 PM, V4 (PRSD/(Psychiatric Rehabilitation Service Director), said, When we have a physical altercation between two residents, we follow the chain of command and we first notify (V1, Administrator), and if he is not available, then the DON (Director of Nursing), if can't reach her, then the staff contact PRSD. We also involve corporate. After an incident happens,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to care for residents. This has the potential to affect all 206 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The Facility Data Sheet, dated January 31, 2024, shows the facility census as 206 residents. On January 31, 2024 at 4:15 PM, V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) said the facility does not have a staffing coordinator, and she does the staff scheduling with V7 (ADON-Assistant Director of Nursing). V2 (DON) continued to say nurses and CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) work day shift from 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM, evening shift from 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM, and night shift from 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM. V2 said [NAME] (Behavioral Aides) help out on the resident units but cannot provide hands-on care to residents such as incontinence care or feeding. [NAME] are able to help answer resident call lights, pass meal trays, and take residents for smoking breaks. V2 continued to say staffing for the facility's census during January 2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a healed pressure ulcer on the coccyx area received care to prevent the development of another pressure ulcer. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 51. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EMR continues to show R2 was transferred to the local hospital on December 20, 2023 due to abnormal lab values and did not return to the facility. R2 had multiple diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes, dementia, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), hypertension, depression, bilateral above the knee amputations, anemia, and high cholesterol. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated December 4, 2023, shows R2 had severe cognitive impairment, required supervision with eating oral hygiene, substantial/maximal assistance with dressing and personal hygiene, and was dependent on facility staff for toilet hygiene, showering, bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to submerge a food processor container for 60 seconds to ensure sanitation. This applies to 6 of 6 (R99, R36, R81, R120, R51, R192) residents reviewed for puree diets in the sample of 35. The findings include: Facility provided Diet Type Report, dated 1/8/24, shows R99, R36, R81, R120, R51, and R192 receive a puree diet. On 1/8/24 at 10:16 AM, V22 (Cook) started to puree food for lunch. V22 started with barbecue pork. At 10:18 AM, V22 brought the food processor container to the three compartment sink and washed and rinsed the container. After rinsing the container, V22 put the food processor container under a stream of running water with pre-diluted sanitizer and removed it within ten seconds. V22 did not fully submerge the container for a minimum of 60 seconds. Facility provided Safety Data Sheet for the sanitizer used in the kitchen shows the sanitizer uses quaternary ammonium compounds (quat) to sanitize. Facility Dishwashing Instructions form, no date, states, . 4. Soak in sanitizer. Collect and soak all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure COVID 19 positive residents remained isolated in their rooms, and failed to ensure doors were kept closed on COVID 19 positive residents for 5 of 35 residents (R175, R1, R151, 154, and R60) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. R175's Rapid (COVID) Testing Results form, dated 1/4/24, showed R175 tested positive for COVID-19. The form showed R175 had symptoms of COVID including a cough. R175's (physician) Order Summary Report, dated 1/4/24, showed, Strict Isolation-Droplet and Contact for COVID-19. On 1/8/24 at 9:03 AM, R175 was seated on a chair in one of the hallways on the second floor. R175 wore no face mask. V13, Behavioral Aide, walked down the hall, past R175. V13 said nothing to R175. When this surveyor asked V13 about R175's COVID status, V13 stated, (R175) is COVID positive. V13 then continued down the hallway. V13 made no attempt to direct R175 back into his room. On 1/8/24 at 9:32 AM, R175 remained seated in the hallway of the second floor with no mask…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who requires extensive assist was provided ADL (activities of daily) care. This applies to 1 of 35 residents (R74) reviewed for ADL's in the sample of 35. The findings include: R74's care plan, date initiated 4/19/23, shows, Focus: I have an ADL (activities daily of living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) epilepsy, dementia, major depression, intellectual disabilities, chronic ischemic heart disease, scoliosis. Interventions: Dressing: Extensive assistance, one person assist. R74's care plan, date initiated 4/27/23, shows, Focus: I require extensive x 1 assistance with grooming r/t dementia intellectual disabilities. On 1/8/24 at 10:35 AM, R74 was wandering around the unit. He was wearing blue pants, a blue shirt, and white socks. He did not have any shoes on. The sole of his socks were black from walking around the unit. His shirt had a brown dry crusted substance on the back by his buttock. At 12:45 PM, there was something wet on the floor in R74's room. R74 had stepped in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's blood glucose value was monitored for a resident with a diagnosis of diabetes, and failed to ensure a resident's sutures were removed who sustained a laceration to his eyebrow/forehead. This applies to 2 of 35 residents (R53 and R108) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. R53's face sheet shows she is a [AGE] year old female with diagnosis including type 2 diabetes, bipolar, glaucoma, and generalized anxiety. R53's Medication Administration Record (M.A.R) for December 2023 and January 2024 shows an order, dated 12/21/23, to check blood sugar before meals for the next 30 days related to type 2 diabetes. The M.A.R shows no documentation of R53's blood sugar for 18 out of 19 days. R53's M.A.R. shows orders for Trulicity (antidiabetic) injection 0.75 mg(milligrams)/05 ml (milliter ). R53's Physician Progress note, dated 12/21/23, documents, (R53's) Power Of Attorney (POA) contacted my…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had hearing aids that were in working order to maintain a resident's hearing for 1 of 35 residents (R127) reviewed for hearing and vision services in the sample of 35. The findings include: R127's resident assessment, dated 10/17/23, showed R127 was hearing impaired and required hearing aids. A physician progress note for R127, dated 9/12/22, showed, Audiologist referral due to HOH (hard of hearing) . A Transportation Request Form, dated 10/12/22, showed R127 was sent out for an appointment with an audiologist. On 1/8/24 at 9:05 AM, this surveyor attempted to interview R127 in her room. R127 wore eyeglasses, but no hearing aids were noted in R127's ears. After this surveyor repeated the same question three different times to R127, R127 stated, I can't hear well. I need hearing aids that work. They got me some 1-2 years ago but they didn't help me at all so I stopped wearing them. I couldn't hear any better with them in. I don't even know where they are anymore. R127 stated she had reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to supervise a resident in the shower (R16), and the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred in a safe manner (R126). These failures apply to 2 of 35 (R16, R126) residents reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. R16's Fall Risk Assessment, dated 8/24/23, showed R16 was at high risk for falls due to her history of falls, a balance problem with walking, instability when making turns, and use of psychotropic medications. R16's Fall-Initial Occurrence Note, dated 12/10/23, showed, Resident had an un-witnessed fall. At 5:35 AM, Resident asked to go take her shower when I suddenly heard screaming inside (the shower) that she fell so I came and found her on the floor lying on her back .Resident stated that when she is about to go inside the shower she fell on her back . The note showed R16 sustained no injuries from the fall. R16's current care plan showed R16 required assistance with walking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain was managed who has a history of chronic pain. This applies to 1 of 35 residents (R196) reviewed for pain management in the sample of 35. The findings include: R196's face sheet shows she is a [AGE] year old female with diagnoses including anxiety, Raynaud's syndrome, polyneuropathy, muscle spasm, scoliosis, and schizoaffective disorder. R196's Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 12/19/23, shows she has pain frequently, pain frequently limits her day to day activities, and is receiving scheduled and as needed pain medication. R196's Physician Order Sheets (POS) dated through January 2024, shows orders on 10/3/23 for pain clinic consult for chronic back pain, and a second order on 11/22/23 for pain consult for chronic back pain per patient request for scoliosis, polyneuropathy, and osteoarthritis. The POS shows orders for Acetaminophen with Codeine 300-30 mg (milligrams) every four hours as needed for scoliosis, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to order a medication after a resident was hospitalized for 1 of 35 residents (R138) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 35. The findings include: A facility assessment done on 12/15/23 showed R138 was cognitively intact. R138's admission Record showed R138 was diagnosed with COVID-19 on 1/5/24. R138's Order Summary Report showed Paxlovid (medication to treat COVID-19) was ordered to be given twice a day for 5 days starting on 1/6/24 and ending on 1/11/24. R138's Progress Notes indicated on 1/6/24, R138 was hospitalized and returned to the facility on 1/7/24. R138's hospital discharge paperwork, dated 1/7/24, showed Paxlovid was to be continued at the nursing home. R138's Order Summary Report showed Paxlovid was not ordered when R138 returned from the hospital. On 1/9/24 at 11:27 AM, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) said R138's Paxlovid was not ordered on R138's return from the hospital because R138 had refused the medication. On 1/9/24 at 12:01 PM, R138 said he never refused Paxlovid. R138 said, Why would I do…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications at ordered times and in ordered dosage. There were 26 opportunities with 6 errors resulting in a 23.08% error rate. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R73 & R185) observed in the medication pass. The findings include: 1. On 1/8/24 at 11:15 AM, V7, Registered Nurse (RN), was giving R73 medications. V7 gave R73 2 gabapentin (pain) capsules, 1 Ativan (anti-anxiety) tablet and 12 units of NovoLog insulin. R73 has a Novolog insulin pen. V7, RN, did not prime the needle prior to giving the 12 units. (The resident only received 10 units). R73's January Medication Administration Record (MAR) shows, Novolog flexpen, subcutaneous solution pen injector 100 unit/ml (milliters) (insulin aspart), inject per sliding scale . The same MAR shows, Gabapentin capsule, 300 mg (milligram), give 2 capsules by mouth three times per day . The medication is scheduled for 9:00 AM, 1:00 PM and 5:00 PM. V7 gave the medication 45 minutes early. 2. On 1/8/24 at 11:20 AM, V7 was giving R185 his medications. V7 gave him…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the prescribed dose of insulin. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R73) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 35. The findings include: On 1/8/24 at 11:15 AM, V7, Registered Nurse (RN), gave R73 her medications. R73's blood sugar was 295. V7 had an insulin pen. V7 was to gave R73 12 units of insulin. She applied the needle to the insulin pen and then turned the dial to 12 units. She did not prime the needle prior to turning the dial to 12 units. (The resident only received 10 units). R73's Medications Administration Record (MAR) shows, Novolog flexpen, subcutaneous solution pen injector 100 unit/ml (milliters) (insulin aspart), inject per sliding scale: if 150-200 = 6 units, 201-250 = 9 units, 251-300 = 12 units, 301-350 = 15 units, 351-400 = 18 units, 401+ call MD, subcutaneously before meals . The facility provided a insulin aspart, recombinant medication guidelines on 1/10/24. The guidelines show, To use the Flexpen or Flex Touch Pen: Prime the pen by removing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep a resident free from abuse from another resident. This applies to 1 resident out 4 (R2) reviewed for resident to resident abuse. Findings include: The facility Resident Abuse Investigation Report, dated 7/30/2023, documented a disagreement between R1 and R2 on 7/30/2023 in the third floor lounge. According to the report, [R1] and [R2] were sitting at a table in the third floor lounge on 7/30/23. They got into an argument regarding [R2] talking in his sleep. A verbal altercation broke out and [R2] stated [R1] lost himself and hit him. [R1] denied hitting [R2]. Peer resident who was in the room notified nursing staff that residents were arguing. Nursing staff immediately separated both residents and ensured safety. R2 was interviewed on 8/8/2023 at 12:34PM, and stated he was beat up by R1, and the local police were called. According to R2, he was sitting at a table in the third floor lounge on 7/30/2023 when R2 and R1 got into an argument and R1 started to hit him. R2 stated that nursing staff intervened and stopped the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$289,723 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $39,375 — penalty dated 2026-01-31
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-01-23
- $118,489 — penalty dated 2024-07-18
- $114,514 — penalty dated 2024-01-10
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-02 for 35 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to APERION CARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHIRA MEYSTEL IRRV TR UAD 1-1-21 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 21% | since 11/01/2017 |
| 1219 LIMTED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| 257 LIMTED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| 42170 LIMTED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| FREDERICK S FRANKEL TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| JUDE, JODIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| SANTOS, PAMELA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| ULBERT, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| APERION CARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| BOTKNECHT, AVIGDOR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| KLEIN, TOM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| BERKOWITZ, DAVID | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| MEYSTEL, YOSEF | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| 201 W NORTH AVE, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| APERION CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| DAVID A BERKOWITZ REVOC TR DAVID BERKOWITZ TTEE | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| YOSEF MEYSTEL DECLARATION OF TR OF YOSEF MEYSTEL TTEE | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145830. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.