Aperion Care Lincoln
1236 Lincoln Ave, Evansville, IN 47714 · For profit - Corporation · 47 certified beds · (812) 464-3607 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $53,454 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-09)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.0% | 11.0% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.0% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 64.7% | 25.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.5% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.3% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.2% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.5% | 95.4% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.3% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.6% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.6% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 6.5% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 23.7% | 79.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.5% | 22.2% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.0% | 10.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.84 | 1.61 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.20 | 1.44 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 73% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 8.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.34 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 47 beds and averages 45.0 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-04-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. A resident did not receive blood pressure medications and was admitted to the hospital two times for hypertensive emergencies. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 4/7/25 at 9:24 A.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertensive encephalopathy. The most recent Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 1/3/25, indicated Resident B was moderately cognitively intact. Care plans included, but were not limited to: Resident had a diagnosis of hypertension: Administer medications as ordered; Assess for side effects and effectiveness; Notify physician of noted signs/symptoms for further evaluation, initiated 2/17/24. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Carvedilol (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) oral tablet 12.5 mg (milligrams) give one tablet by mouth two times a day for hypertension; Start date 2/9/24 Isosorbide Mononitrate (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-03-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective treatment and services were provided to residents with Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) in 2 of 3 residents reviewed for UTIs. Urinalysis (UA) and Culture and Sensitivity (C&S) tests were not completed or followed up on, antibiotics were not prescribed in a timely manner, and catheter care was not performed correctly. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 21 being hospitalized for the treatment of pyelonephritis (a kidney infection). (Resident 21 and Resident 9) Findings include: 1.On 2/29/24 at 11:19 A.M., Resident 21's clinical record was reviewed and indicated the resident was re-admitted to the facility from a hospital on [DATE] with a newly initiated indwelling urinary catheter and diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic kidney disease, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and acute kidney failure. The most current Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 1/17/24, indicated Resident 21 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards for 2 of 4 residents reviewed. A cognitively impaired resident had medications in their room, unlocked and unattended. Resident 24 had six falls in two months, one resulted in a fracture to the left hip with one additional fall after the fracture. (Resident 24, Resident 13) Findings include: 1. On 7/29/22 at 9:07 A.M., Resident 24's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, depression, dementia, and osteopenic bones. The most recent significant change MDS (minimum data set) Assessment, dated 6/2/22, indicated Resident 24 required extensive assistance of two staff with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, and was completely dependent on one staff for bathing. The MDS indicated Resident 24 had a moderate cognitive impairment. A current care plan for risk for falls, dated 6/25/21, included the following interventions: anti rollback to wheelchair, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served under sanitary conditions for 2 of 2 random observations. An ice scoop was located on top of the ice machine without a cover, food was left uncovered on the steam table prior to food service, and staff touched food with contaminated gloves while serving lunch. (Dietary Pantry and Dining Room)Findings include: 1. Continuous random lunch observation in the first-floor dining room on 5/18/26 at 11:58 A.M., staff were observed placing food trays in the steam table. The food was not covered. The food included chicken, potatoes, carrots, mashed potatoes, gravy, rolls, hot dogs, and cheeseburgers. The food remained uncovered until staff put lids over the food at 12:10 P.M. At 12:16 P.M., [NAME] 7 put on gloves, touched a towel, the tray tops, serving ware, and her face. At 12:19 P.M., [NAME] 7 began plating food without changing gloves. She placed rolls onto plates using her hand. Plating continued in that way until 12:33 P.M. when [NAME] 7 began to use tongs to plate the rolls. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices and standards were followed for 4 of 4 residents observed during medication administration (Resident S, Resident R, Resident L, and Resident K) and 2 random observations of wound care (Resident G and Resident H). The rubber injectable port for insulin was not cleaned prior to placing the needle on the insulin pen. The resident's arm was not cleaned with alcohol prior to insulin administration. Vital sign equipment was not cleaned in between residents. Gloves were not changed between touching contaminated surfaces and clean surfaces. A gown was not worn while providing care for a resident who required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Findings include:1. On 5/21/26 at 7:24 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) 3 was observed preparing medications for Resident S. RN 3 put on gloves, touched the medication cart, the computer, and the water jug. Without changing her gloves, RN 3 obtained two medication cards from the medication cart drawer, popped one tablet from each card into her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided bathing on their scheduled days for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for bathing. ( Resident F, Resident T) Findings include: 1. Random observation on 5/20/26 at 11:00 A.M., Resident F was observed sitting in a wheelchair with greasy hair, unshaven face, and dark substance coming out of his nose. Random observation on 5/21/26 at 1:30 P.M., Resident F was observed lying in bed with greasy hair, an unshaven face, emesis in the bed and floor, and dried feces in the sheets. On 5/19/26 at 9:47 A.M., Resident F's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included but were not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, anxiety, and depression.The current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident F was cognitively impaired. Resident F was dependent on bathing. The Point of Care (POC) Task for Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) was reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment in resident spaces on 1 of 2 units observed. (100 unit ) Findings include: On 4/8/26 at 9:37 a.m., the following was observed on the 100 Unit: The stairs leading up to the 100 Unit were observed to have debris build up on the surface and in the corners, a folded up band-aid was lying on the steps. The common area wall by the stairwell, and a wall across from a room marked medical suite had cove base coming off the walls.Dirt was built-up under the water fountains.The double fire doors on the unit had dirt build up around the door frames and wall.The hallways on the unit had dirt build up in the corners and around door frames to resident rooms.A room that contained a fireplace and piano had soiled stained carpets. A kitchenette by the main dining room had debris on the floor, debris under a metal storage rack, and a large dead bug under the rack.The outside of the trashcan was soiled, the inside of the refrigerator was soiled with a black and red substance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was admitted with pressure ulcers was provided care and services to promote healing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident D)Finding Includes: On 4/9/26 at 9:35 a.m., Resident D was observed in his room sitting in a power wheelchair. Resident D indicated he thought he had been at the facility for three weeks or longer. On 4/9/26 at 10:16 a.m., Resident D's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, traumatic brain injury, paraplegia, complete traumatic amputation of lower leg, and cognitive communication deficit. A Hospital After Visit Summary, dated 3/11/26 through 3/22/26, indicated throughout the admission, Resident D was supported with specialty beds and wound care for pressure injuries.The Facility Admission/readmission Observation document, dated 3/23/26 at 3:55 p.m., was reviewed and included but was not limited to, right trochanter (hip) stage 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0659 — widespreadProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure employees held an active license required to provide nursing care to residents. An employee did not have an active nursing license that provided care to residents. (100 unit, 200 unit) This deficient practice was corrected on November 3, 2025, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance.Finding includes: On 3/25/26 at 11:15 a.m., an employee file for LPN 2 (Licensed Practical Nurse) was reviewed. The file did not contain documentation of a license for a Licensed Practical Nurse. LPN's hire date was 9/30/25, termination date 11/1/25. On 3/25/26 at 11:50 a.m., the Administrator indicated the facility was unable to verify LPN 2 had an active nursing license, she was hired without verifying she held a license, was sent home on [DATE] after she could not verify she held a nursing license. On 3/26/26 at 9:52 a.m., the Administrator indicated LPN 2 worked on all units in the facility during her employment. The Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate pharmaceutical services were available to provide physician prescribed routine medications for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. Residents routine medications were not readily available from the pharmacy to be administered per the physician orders. (Resident C, Resident D)Findings include:1. During an interview on 2/4/26 at 9:25 A.M., Resident C indicated that she had recently not received her routine antianxiety medication due to the facility running out of the medication.During record review on 2/4/26 at 9:40 A.M., Resident C's diagnoses included, but were not limited to depression and anxiety. Resident C's physician orders included but were not limited to; Ativan 1 milligram (mg) 1 tablet three times daily (started 12/19/24). Resident C's January 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the order for Ativan 1 mg three times daily was not documented as administered on 1/27/26 for the 2:00 P.M. and 8:00 P.M. dose. Resident C's nurse's progress notes on 1/27/26 included but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to report an alleged violation of sexual abuse to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 1 allegation of abuse reviewed. (Resident T)Finding includes:In an anonymous interview, it was indicated that Resident B asked Resident T for sex and to see her breasts, and that Resident T was not capable of giving consent.During an interview on 9/24/25 at 9:24 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated that a few weeks prior, a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) had reported to her that Resident B went into Resident T's room and asked her to be his girlfriend and if she had ever had sex. Resident T responded no and Resident B left. The DON was unable to remember when that incident occurred.During an interview on 9/24/25 at 11:00 A.M., the DON indicated that the CNA also reported to her that Resident T showed Resident B her breasts. She indicated that the incident occurred on or around 8/23/25.During an interview on 9/24/25 at 1:04 P.M., the Administrator indicated he was aware of the incident that occurred between Resident B and Resident T. He was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident T)Finding includes:In an anonymous interview, it was indicated that Resident B asked Resident T for sex and to see her breasts, and that Resident T was not capable of giving consent.During an interview on 9/24/25 at 9:24 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated that a few weeks prior, a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) had reported to her that Resident B went into Resident T's room and asked her to be his girlfriend and if she had ever had sex. Resident T responded no and Resident B left. She completed a capacity for sexual consent assessment for both residents at that time and told Resident B he could not ask those questions to other residents. She indicated that there was no other documentation surrounding the incident between Resident B and Resident T.During an interview on 9/24/25 at 11:00 A.M., the DON indicated that the CNA also reported to her that Resident T showed Resident B her breasts.During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wound treatments were completed as ordered for 1 of 3 resident's reviewed for wounds. (Resident C) Finding includes:On 9/23/25 at 1:39 P.M., Resident C's clinical record was reviewed. Resident C's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 7/21/25, indicated Resident C was cognitively intact, and had a surgical wound. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Wound vac to be changed every three days; Start Date 8/8/25 The electronic treatment administration record indicated Resident C's wound vac was scheduled to be changed on the following days in September 2025, but was not changed:9/7/259/10/25 During an interview on 9/24/25 at 12:32 P.M., the Director of Nursing indicated Resident C's wound vac was not changed on 9/7/25 or 9/10/25. On 9/24/25 at 3:02 P.M., the Administrator provided a policy titled Skin Condition Assessment and Monitoring, revised 6/2018, that indicated Physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bath or shower was provided for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for bathing. (Resident C) Finding includes:On 9/23/25 at 1:39 P.M., Resident C's clinical record was reviewed. Resident C's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 7/21/25, indicated Resident C was cognitively intact and required moderate assistance (staff do part of the work) for bathing. During an observation on 9/23/25 at 1:00 P.M., Resident C indicated that bathing had not been completed or bed linen hadn't been changed in weeks. Resident C had a very pungent sour smell, greasy hair, and long, soiled fingernails. The point of care (POC, a certified nurses aide charting system) indicated Resident C preferred bathing twice weekly in the evenings. Paper and electronic shower records were reviewed for the last 30 days, and indicated Resident C had not received or refused a bath or shower on the following dates: 8/26/259/12/259/19/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for behavior management. An incident with another resident was not documented, a resident's care plan was not updated following the incident, and behaviors were not monitored. (Resident B)Finding includes:In an anonymous interview, it was indicated that Resident B asked Resident T for sex and to see her breasts, and that Resident T was not capable of giving consent.During an interview on 9/23/25 at 1:10 P.M., Resident B indicated that he struggled with mental health disorders due to his time in the war. He indicated that he would like to move to a facility closer to his family.During an interview on 9/23/25 at 1:22 P.M., Resident T indicated that a male resident would open her door sometimes and then leave, but she did not know who it was or recall any specific encounters with any male residents.On 9/23/25 at 2:08 P.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications for 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed. The medication room, treatment cart, and medication refrigerator were not locked. (First Floor Medication Room)Finding includes: On 9/23/25 at 1:04 P.M., the first floor medication room that contained the Emergency Drug Kit (EDK) was observed unlocked. Inside the room, the treatment cart and the refrigerator that contained insulin, suppositories, and other cold medication was observed unlocked. At that time, Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 16 indicated that the medication room, treatment cart, and medication refrigerator were all supposed to be locked.On 9/24/25 at 2:27 P.M., the Administrator provided a current Medication Storage policy, revised 7/2/19, that indicated Facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals, including treatment items, are securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by residents and visitors.This citation relates to Intake 2615731.3.1-25(m)
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dignity was provided for 1 of 1 observations of meal trays passed. Staff were observed to enter resident rooms without knocking or announcing themselves. ( room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident F) Finding includes: On 7/3/25 at 10:14 a.m., resident council minutes dated 5/29/25 were reviewed and included a complaint of staff not knocking or introducing themselves before entering the room. On 7/7/25 at 12:34 p.m., CNA 2 was observed to deliver lunch trays to room [ROOM NUMBER], 211, 213, 214, and 216. CNA 2 did not knock or announce herself before walking in the rooms. On 7/7/25 at 1:10 p.m., CNA 3 indicated before delivering a meal tray to a resident in their room, you should knock and let them know you have food for them. On 7/7/25 at 2:41 p.m., the Administrator provided the current policy on resident rights with a revision date of 4/23/18. The policy included but was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was served at an appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 meal tested on unit 200. ( Unit 200, Resident F) Finding includes: On 7/3/25 at 8:55 a.m., Resident F indicated food was not always served hot, it was sometimes ice cold depending on what time it was delivered to her. On 7/7/25 food temperatures were taken on the 200 unit for the noon meal. The temperature of the herb roasted pork loin was 115, stuffing 85, peas 79. On 7/7/25 at 2:41 p.m., the Administrator provided the current guideline and procedure for monitoring food temperatures for meal service with a date of 2020. The guidelines included but were not limited to: Food temperatures will be monitored to prevent foodborne illness and ensure foods are served at a palatable temperature .8. meals that are served on room trays may be periodically checked at the point of service for palatable food temperatures. Food temperatures of hot foods on room trays at the point of service are preferred to be at 120 F (Fahrenheit) or greater to promote…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served in a sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 2 of 2 observations of the kitchen. Floors were soiled, food unlabeled. (Kitchen) Findings include: On 7/3/25 at 8:17 a.m., during observation of the kitchen the following was observed: 1. The walk in freezer contained partially used bags of breaded chicken, mixed vegetables, and garlic bread. The bags were unlabeled. 2. The floor behind the stove and deep fryer, stainless steel table that contained a sink had soil buildup and debris. On 7/3/25 at 8:21 a.m., the Dietary Manager indicated the floors under equipment are usually cleaned once a week. On 7/7/25 at 1:00 p.m., the floors were observed to still be soiled. The walk in freezer contained a box of fish squares that were open to air, unsealed. On 7/7/25 at 1:06 p.m., Dietary Aide 2 indicated when food is opened, it is put in a plastic bag with the open date and dated 30 days out. On 7/7/25 at 2:41 p.m., the Administrator provided the current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records, quarterly assessments were completed and documented in the clinical record. The Facility elopement risks were not documented in the clinical record. (Resident E) Finding includes: On 7/7/25 at 9:08 a.m., Resident E's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, cognitive communication deficit. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident E's cognition was severely impaired, uses walker, once standing, the ability to walk at least 150 feet in a corridor or similar space, supervision or touching assistance, helper provides verbal cues or touching/steadying assistance as resident completes activity. Care plans were reviewed and included but were not limited to: Resident is at risk for elopement per elopement risk assessment, initiated 4/27/23, revision 8/22/24. Interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in sanitary manner for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. Food containers were not labeled in the reach in refrigerator and dry storage. Findings include: On 4/3/25 at 10:35 A.M., the following was observed in the dry storage area: - One bag of [NAME] noodles with no open date - One bag of marshmallows with no open date On 4/3/25 at 10:57 A.M., the following was observed in the reach in refrigerator: - One container of orange juice without preparation date or use by date - One container of apple juice without a preparation date or use by date - One green container with orange colored fluid without a label, preparation date, or use by date - One pink container with brown colored fluid without a label, preparation date, or use by date - One clear container with purple colored fluid without a label, preparation date, or use by date - Two green colored containers with fluid, without a label, preparation date, or use by date -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-09 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure designation of a certified Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP did not currently dedicate at least part time hours to the role of IP for 1 of 1 staff members reviewed for IP. Finding includes: On 4/9/25 at 9:30 A.M., the DON's employee file was reviewed. The employee file lacked a signed job description for the Infection Preventionist role. On 4/9/25 at 9:37 A.M., the DON indicated she was currently responsible for the infection prevention and control program in the facility. She indicated she also worked full time in the facility as the DON. On 4/9/25 at 12:14 P.M., the DON provided a current Infection Preventionist job description, dated 4/14/22, that indicated Reports to: Director of Nursing and/or Administrator . The role of the Infection Preventionist is to oversee the infection prevention and control program for the surveillance, investigation, prevention, and control of healthcare-associated infections and other infectious diseases. On 4/9/25 at 12:14 P.M., the DON provided a current Director of Nursing job…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were completed quarterly for 6 of 7 residents reviewed for care plan conferences. (Resident P, Resident S, Resident D, Resident N, Resident B, and Resident F) Findings include: 1. On 4/7/25 at 12:35 P.M., Resident P's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy, diabetes mellitus, and major depressive disorder. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/25/25, indicated Resident P was cognitively intact. The most current care plan conference was completed on 10/31/24. 2. On 4/4/25 at 12:40 P.M., Resident S's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited, to dementia, repeated falls, and major depressive disorder. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 2/20/25, indicated that Resident S had severe cognitive impairment. The most current care plan conference was completed on 11/14/24. 3. On 4/7/25 at 2:40 P.M., Resident D's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public for 11 random observations on 5 of 5 days. Offensive odors were detected in public hallways, alcoves and stairwells (throughout 100-unit hallways, in front of chapel, alcoves on 200 unit, outside of rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], Holy Family Nurses Station), dirty showers and resident room floors were observed. (Resident P and Resident D) Findings include: 1. On 4/3/25 at 9:30 A.M., during a random observation, the smell of urine was observed on the first floor outside of the chapel. 2. On 4/3/25 at 11:35 A.M., during a random observation the strong smell of urine was observed outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] and 113. 3. On 4/4/25 at 10:03 A.M., during a random observation, the strong smell of urine was observed in the hallway outside of the chapel. 4. On 4/7/25 at 8:50 A.M., during a random observation, the strong smell of urine was observed in the hallway in front of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents dependent on staff for ADLs (activities of daily living) were showered and hair was shampooed for 9 of 10 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Resident P, Resident S, Resident G, Resident D, Resident B, Resident N, Resident F, Resident L, and Resident U) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 4/4/25 at 9:03 A.M., Resident P indicated that she only got a shower once a week most weeks. She preferred a shower because staff didn't wash her hair when they gave her a bed bath. She indicated that she was told they were short staffed and sometimes didn't have time to get her up for a shower. She indicated that there was no one in the facility to cut her hair and that her family tried to fill that role. At that time, Resident P's hair was observed to be oily. On 4/7/25 at 12:35 P.M., Resident P's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy, diabetes mellitus, and major depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food that was served at palatable temperature for 1 of 1 trays tested for food temperature. Findings include: On 4/7/35 at 12:50 P.M., a hall tray was obtained on the 200 Unit. The following temperatures were observed: Carrots-115 degrees F During an interview on 4/7/25 at 12:45, the Dietary Manager indicated that the holding temperatures on the steam table should be 145 degrees F or higher. On 4/9/25 at 12:14 P.M., The Director of Nursing (DON) provided a current, non-dated policy Monitoring Food Temperatures for Meal Service. The policy indicated . food temperatures will be monitored to prevent foodborne illness and ensure foods are served at palatable temperatures .serving/holding temperatures require 140 minimum when checked prior to meal service .meals that are served on room trays .prefer hot foods to be at 120 degrees F or greater for the palatability for the resident . This citation relates to Complaint IN00449780. 3.1-21(a)(2)
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate a resident's choice of activity for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for choices. A resident's morning care was not completed in time for the resident to attend mass. (Resident P) Finding includes: On 4/4/25 at 9:05 A.M., Resident P indicated she wanted to go to mass, but staff didn't always get her up in time to go. Mass was scheduled daily in the facility at 11:00 A.M. On 4/7/25 at 12:35 P.M., Resident P's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy and major depressive disorder. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/24/25, indicated that Resident P was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff (staff does all of the effort) for toileting and bathing. The most current care plan conference was completed on 10/31/24. Care plans were reviewed and updated. A current preferences care plan, initiated 2/12/21, indicated that the resident preferred to get up for the day at 10:00 A.M. or as desired. A current self care deficit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0572 — isolatedGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident signed admission paperwork and resident rights and was provided a copy for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for new admissions. (Resident L) Finding includes: During an interview on 4/4/25 at 8:36 A.M., Resident L indicated she was unaware of her rights as a resident in the facility, and had not signed or received an admission packet. On 4/7/25 at 8:55 A.M., Resident L's clinical record was reviewed. Resident L was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, malignant neoplasm. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/25/25, indicated Resident L was cognitively intact. An admission packet was signed 3/21/25 by the Social Services Director (SSD) and Resident L. During an interview on 4/8/25 at 1:53 P.M., Resident L stated the signature on the admission packet was not hers. During an interview on 4/9/25 at 9:19 A.M., the SSD indicated residents sign the admission packets electronically and were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical documentation was sent with a resident during a transfer for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Resident B and Resident D) Findings include: On 4/7/25 at 9:24 A.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hypertensive encephalopathy. The most recent Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 1/3/25, indicated Resident B was moderately cognitively intact, required partial assistance from staff (staff do half of the work) for toileting and transfers, and required substantial assistance for bathing (staff do more than half of the work). Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Carvedilol oral tablet 12.5 mg (milligrams) give one tablet by mouth two times a day for hypertension; Start date 2/9/24 Isosorbide Mononitrate ER (extended release) oral tablet 60 mg give one tablet by mouth two times a day for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; Start date 2/9/24 Lisinopril oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a notice of transfer was provided to the ombudsman for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospital transfers. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 4/7/25 at 9:24 A.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hypertensive encephalopathy. The most recent Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 1/3/25, indicated Resident B was moderately cognitively intact, required partial assistance from staff (staff do half of the work) for toileting and transfers, and required substantial assistance for bathing (staff do more than half of the work). Resident B was transferred to the hospital on 6/25/24, 9/8/24, and 12/8/24. A list of transfers and discharges for June, September, and December 2024 sent to the ombudsman was requested, but failed to be provided. During an interview on 4/9/25 at 12:49 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated there was no notification to ombudsman for June, September, or December 2024 transfers. On 4/9/25 at 12:14 P.M., the DON provided an undated policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold was provided upon transfer for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Resident B and Resident D) Finding includes: 1. On 4/7/25 at 9:24 A.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hypertensive encephalopathy. The most recent Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 1/3/25, indicated Resident B was moderately cognitively intact, required partial assistance from staff (staff do half of the work) for toileting and transfers, and required substantial assistance for bathing (staff do more than half of the work). Resident B was transferred to the hospital on 6/25/24 and 12/8/24. The clinical record lacked documentation of a bed hold provided for the transfer to the hospital on 6/25/24. The clinical record lacked documentation of a bed hold provided for the transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. During an interview on 4/9/25 at 12:49 P.M. the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed accurately for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for weight loss. (Resident S) Finding includes: On 4/4/25 at 12:40 P.M., Resident S's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, diabetes mellitus, and dysphagia. The most current Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 2/5/25, indicated Resident S had severe cognitive impairment, required setup assistance from staff for eating, weighed 179 pounds (lbs), and had no weight loss. The most current Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 2/20/25, indicated Resident S had severe cognitive impairment, required setup assistance from staff for eating, weighed 132 lbs, and had no weight loss. A review of the weights and vitals tab indicated Resident S was weighed on the following days: - 1/3/25 - 179.3 lbs standing - 2/18/25 - 131.7 lbs wheelchair (a 26.55% weight loss) On 4/8/25 at 2:51 P.M., CNA 18 weighed Resident S. The resident weighed 162.8 lbs including the wheelchair weight. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0659 — isolatedProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Qualified Medication Aides (QMA) practiced within the QMA scope of practice for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident U and Resident P) Findings include: 1. On 4/7/25 at 12:29 P.M., Resident U's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/24/25, indicated Resident U was moderately cognitively intact. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Hydrocodone-acetaminophen (pain medication) oral tablet 7.5-325 mg (milligrams) give one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain for 30 days; Start date 3/18/25. The following days indicate a QMA administered Hydrocodone-acetaminophen 7.5-325 mg tablet without prior authorization from a nurse: - 3/24/25 7:02 P.M. - 3/28/25 9:37 A.M. - 3/29/25 3:41 P.M. 2. On 4/7/25 at 12:35 P.M., Resident P's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy, diabetes mellitus, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to identify the potential for the development of pressure ulcers, perform routine skin checks, and follow the plan of care to promote wound healing for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for facility acquired heel wounds. (Resident F, Resident F) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 4/4/25 at 2:29 P.M., Resident N was observed to have a wound vac (a medical device that uses negative pressure to promote wound healing) on his right heel. Resident N indicated it started out as a blister and developed larger requiring surgical debridement and a skin graft. Resident N indicated the wound resulted in him staying in the facility longer than anticipated. On 4/4/25 at 12:48 P.M., Resident N's clinical record was reviewed. Resident N was admitted on [DATE] for therapy following a recent fracture surgery. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow fall protocol, revise care plans, and follow interventions to reduce the risk of falls for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident D and Resident S) Findings include: 1. During a confidential interview during the survey, it was indicated that Resident D had fallen a lot while attempting to self toilet because when he pushed his call light no one came to help him to the bathroom. On 4/4/25 at 1:26 P.M., Resident D was observed sitting by himself in his wheelchair in his room eating. The call light was wrapped around the bed rail and was not clipped to or within reach of the resident. There was not a dycem in his wheelchair. The resident was wearing socks without nonskid bottoms. Non skid strips were not observed anywhere in the resident's room. On 4/7/25 at 2:40 P.M., Resident D's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, epileptic seizures, wedge compression fracture of unspecified lumbar vertebra, repeated falls, unsteadiness on feet, and weakness. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional care and services including failure to identify significant weight loss, failure to notify the physician of significant weight loss, and failure to be reviewed by the Registered Dietician for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for weight loss (Resident S). Finding includes: On 4/4/25 at 12:40 P.M., Resident S's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, diabetes mellitus, and dysphagia. The most current Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 2/5/25, indicated Resident S had severe cognitive impairment, required setup assistance from staff for eating, weighed 179 pounds (lbs), and had no weight loss. The most current Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 2/20/25, indicated Resident S had severe cognitive impairment, required setup assistance from staff for eating, weighed 132 lbs, and had no weight loss. The most recent care plan conference was completed on 11/14/24. The care plan was reviewed and updated. A current nutritional status care plan, revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed and a resident's nutritional feedings were administered for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for tube feedings. A resident's enteral nutrition refusals were not documented, and feeding equipment was not changed daily. (Resident G) Finding includes: On 4/3/25 at 11:44 A.M., Resident G was observed sitting in her wheelchair in her room. Jevity (tube feeding) formula, dated 4/2/25, was observed in the room but was not hooked up to the resident. A syringe was observed hanging in a bag and was dated 4/1/25. On 4/4/25 at 1:24 P.M., the enteral nutrition was observed turned off in Resident G's room. Resident G was not in her room at that time. A syringe was observed hanging in a bag and was dated 4/1/24. On 4/7/25 at 11:37 A.M., the enteral nutrition was observed turned off in Resident G's room. Resident G was not in her room at that time. The feeding tube was wrapped around the pole and there was no cap on the end of the tubing. On 4/8/25 at 10:57 A.M., the enteral nutrition was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented for 2 of 3 residents observed for care. Gloves were not changed and hand hygiene was not performed. (CNA 23, RN 28, RN 7) Findings include: 1. On 4/8/25 at 10:42 A.M., incontinence care was observed for Resident 22. CNA 23 sanitized with hand sanitizer and donned gloves while RN 28 only donned gloves. CNA 23 gathered supplies with the gloves on, turned the resident to the right side, and removed the resident's sweatpants and soiled brief. CNA 23 provided incontinence care using three wash cloths and turned the resident to the left side, then RN 28 completed the incontinence care with two more washcloths. RN 28 removed the soiled gloves and washed hands with soap and water. CNA 23 utilized the same gloves to place barrier cream on Resident 22. CNA 23 wiped the gloved hands with the barrier clean inside the clean incontinence brief and then put the clean incontinence brief on Resident 22. 2. During an observation of wound care on 4/9/25 at 11:40 A.M., RN 7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate safety measures were in place to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. This deficient practice resulted in Resident B obtaining injuries that resulted in medical intervention. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 3/18/25 at 9:23 a.m., Resident B indicated a staff member was transferring her from bed to a shower chair, the Hoyer(mechanical lift) tipped over and fell on top of her. Resident B indicated the staff member had started pulling the Hoyer lift closer to herself, all of a sudden it tipped over and fell on her, causing injury to her right knee, bruising, she felt like it broke her little toe, she had low back pain at times. Resident B indicated the staff member protected her and sustained a few injuries herself, there was only one staff member who transferred her, another staff had asked if she needed help and was told no. Resident B was unsure of staff names. On 3/18/25 at 10:10 a.m., Resident B's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances were documented and resolved for 3 anonymous residents interviewed and 9 of 9 residents who attended Resident Council. Findings include: 1. In an anonymous interview, a resident indicated a complaint was made to the Social Services Director (SSD) in January 2024 about a housekeeper who had been disrespectful to the resident. The resident indicated they didn't want the housekeeper to clean their room anymore. At that time, the resident indicated the complaint was never followed up on, and the housekeeper still cleaned their room, but they don't talk to each other. 2. In an anonymous interview, a resident indicated a complaint was made to the Administrator about a staff member who spoke harshly to them about the use of a call light. The resident indicated the Administrator followed up with them about the call light, but not about the behavior of the staff member. 3. In an anonymous interview, a resident indicated the procedure to file a grievance was to write it down on a piece of paper and give it to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary tract infections and 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 9, Resident 26, Resident 17, Resident 30, and Resident 32). Findings include: 1. On 2/27/24 at 1:06 P.M., Resident 9's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Multiple Sclerosis, epilepsy, and schizoaffective disorder. The most recent Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 12/4/23, indicated Resident 9 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance from two staff members for toileting. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Keppra (anticonvulsant) Tablet 1000 MG (milligrams) - Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for seizures related to epilepsy, start date 3/5/2020. Cranberry Tablet 450 MG - Give 2 tablets by mouth at bedtime for urinary supplement, start date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide proper storage of medications in 1 of 3 medication carts and 1 treatment cart observed. Loose pills and unlabeled medications were found in the medication and treatment carts. (Holy Name Medication Cart and JJ Nurses Station) Findings include: 1. On 2/28/24 at 8:15 A.M., the following was observed in the Holy Name Medication cart: 1 large brown pill 1 large white pill The following, found at the same time, were marked with [resident name] but lacked an open date or label: 1 bottle of stool softener 1 bottle of Donepezil 1 bottle of acetaminophen 500 mg (Milligrams) 1 bottle of calcium 1 bottle of daily fiber 1 bottle of women's multivitamin 1 bottle of powdered laxative 2. On 2/28/24 at 8:27 A.M., the following was observed in the treatment cart in the JJ Nurses Station: 1 bottle of Tuberculin Solution with an open date of 11/22/23 and an expiration date of 2/25, lot number 66059 1 tube of pain relief cream with [resident name] that lacked an open date or label 1 bottle of powdered laxative that lacked a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, labeled, and dated properly in accordance with professional standards for food service for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. Finding includes: On 2/26/24 at 9:22 A.M., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following items were observed: In the reach-in refrigerator: a clear plastic container with a green lid contained a white liquid; not labeled with contents or date A sour cream container with soup inside; not labeled with contents or date 1 opened can of dessert topping; no date 1 red drink pitcher with no date or contents label, and 1 red drink pitcher with a prep date 2/23/24 and use by date 2/25/24 2 blue drink pitchers; not labeled with contents or date In the walk-in freezer: a gallon plastic Ziploc bag labeled spaghetti sauce dated 12/20/23 and use by 6/2/23 1 opened bag of pepperonis with a manufacture expiration date 12/17/23 In the dry storage area: 1 dented can stewed tomatoes 2 dented cans…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices and standards were followed in 2 of 2 residents observed during care and 3 of 3 residents observed during medication administration. Hand hygiene was not performed correctly and vital sign equipment was not cleaned between residents. (Resident 32, Resident 8, Resident 29, Resident 21, and Resident 26) Findings include: 1. On 2/28/24 at 6:45 A.M., during a medication pass for Resident 32, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 7 was observed entering the room without performing hand hygiene. LPN 7 took a temperature of 97 degrees Fahrenheit using a digital temporal thermometer and administered medications. Upon completion, LPN 32 left the room without hand sanitizing or cleaning the equipment after usage. 2. On 2/28/24 at 7:15 A.M., during a medication pass for Resident 8, LPN 8 was observed taking a blood pressure of 152/74 for the resident, and did not clean equipment after usage. 3. On 2/28/24 at 7:51 A.M., during a medication pass for Resident 29, LPN 8 was observed taking a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-04 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed timely within 14 days of admission for 1 of 2 new admission residents reviewed. (Resident 135) Finding includes: On 2/26/24 at 2:39 P.M., Resident 135's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 135 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 2/1/24, indicated it was still in process and not completed. During an interview on 3/4/24 at 10:16 A.M., the MDS Coordinator indicated the MDS Assessment was not completed within 14 days of admission. A policy was requested but not provided. The MDS Coordinator stated the facility follows RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Manual guidelines that indicate For the admission Assessment, the MDS Completion Date must be no later than 13 days after the Entry Date. 3.1-31(d)(1)
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment was completed accurately for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 23) Finding includes: On 2/27/24 at 2:27 P.M., Resident 23's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, atrial fibrillation. The most recent quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 12/18/23, indicated Resident 23 was cognitively intact and did not receive an anticoagulant during the 7-day look back period. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Eliquis (an anticoagulant) Tablet 5 MG (milligrams) - Give 5 mg by mouth two times a day for blood thinner related to atrial fibrillation, dated 8/17/23. The December 2023 MAR (medication administration record) indicated Resident 23 received Eliquis twice daily in December. On 2/29/24 at 2:20 P.M., the MDS Coordinator indicated that the Eliquis should have been coded as an anticoagulant on the 12/18/23 quarterly MDS Assessment and was overlooked. At that time, the MDS Coordinator indicated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-04 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a base line care plan for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dementia care, respiratory care, and antipsychotic medications. (Resident 85) Finding includes: On 2/28/24 at 10:20 A.M., Resident 85's clinical record was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbances, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbation. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Aricept (a cognition-enhancing medication) Oral Tablet 5 MG (Milligrams) (Donepezil Hydrochloride), Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime related to dementia in other diseased classified elsewhere, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbances, dated 2/23/24. Buspirone (an antianxiety medication) HCl Oral Tablet 5 MG (Buspirone HCl). Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to anxiety disorder, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was properly labeled and oxygen services were provided according to physician order for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 85, Resident 17) Findings include: 1. On 2/26/24 at 10:48 A.M., Resident 85 was observed lying in bed with oxygen that lacked a label or date on the tubing and humidification bottle. There was also no storage bag observed anywhere in the room. On 2/28/24 at 11:15 A.M., Resident 85 was sitting in a wheelchair with oxygen on, the tubing and water bottle were not dated. There was no oxygen tubing storage bag present. On 2/29/24 at 2:06 P.M., Resident 85's oxygen tubing was observed to be in an undated, unlabeled storage bag. On 2/28/24 at 10:20 A.M., Resident 85's clinical record review was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation and acute and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A resident's as needed antianxiety medication was ordered for greater than 14 days. (Resident 17) Finding includes: On 2/27/23 at 11:01 A.M., Resident 17's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 12/11/23, indicated Resident 17 was cognitively intact and received an antianxiety medication during the 7-day lookback period. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Klonopin (an antianxiety medication) Oral Tablet 1 MG (milligrams) - Give 1 tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for anxiety, dated 1/26/2024 with no stop date indicated. The January 2024 MAR (medication administration record) indicated Resident 17 received PRN (as needed) Klonopin on 1/26. The February 2024 MAR indicated Resident 17 received PRN Klonopin on 2/8, 2/21,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Dates of indwelling catheter changes were incorrectly documented. (Resident 21) Finding includes: On 2/29/24 at 11:19 A.M., Resident 21's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic kidney disease, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and acute kidney failure. The most current Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 1/17/24, indicated Resident 21 was cognitively intact, had an indwelling catheter, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Change indwelling catheter 16fr (French) 10ml (milliliters) Q (every) month and PRN (as needed) every day shift every 30 day(s) for catheter change, dated 12/10/23. Change indwelling catheter 16fr 10ml Q month and PRN every day shift starting on the 11th and ending on the 12th…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor rights of the residents. The chapel was closed and residents were restricted to certain areas of the facility for 6 of 6 days of the survey. (Resident 37) Findings include: On 7/25/22 at 9:15 a.m., the chapel on the 100 unit was observed to have a chain and padlock attached to both entry doors with a sign that stated Due to being in outbreak status related to COVID -19 the Chapel will be CLOSED until further notice! On 7/26/22 at 8:44 a.m., the same was observed. On 7/27/22 at 8:33 a.m. the same was observed. On 7/28/22 at 10:10 a.m., the same was observed. On 7/29/22 at 8:45 a.m., the same was observed. On 07/26/22 at 9:22 a.m., Resident 37 indicated the facility had chains on the doors to the chapel, mass was not being offered, residents were told to stay on the floor where they resided, they thought the chains were extreme and residents in the facility were upset about it. On 7/27/22 at 10:29 a.m., an anonymous resident interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a plan of care was implemented to address the resident's medical and physical needs for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. A resident did not receive weekly skin assessments, and a dressing was not changed per the physician's order. (Resident 11) Finding includes: On 7/28/22 at 10:28 A.M., Resident 11's clinical record was reviewed. The most recent significant change MDS (minimum data set) Assessment, dated 5/13/22, indicated Resident 11 was currently receiving hospice services, was at risk for pressure ulcers, and a had a moderate cognitive impairment. Current physician's orders included, but were not limited to, the following: Cleanse on and around below coccyx, apply med honey and cover with foam dressing, once a day, dated 7/14/22 Weekly skin assessments, dated 1/31/22 A current risk for skin impairment care plan, dated 1/27/22, indicted interventions, but were not limited to, weekly skin assessments, dated 1/27/22. Weekly skin assessments were completed on the following dates from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide showers/baths for 2 of 3 residents reviewed. Residents were not given showers or baths. (Resident C, Resident D) Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 10:41 a.m., Resident C indicated she was not getting a shower twice a week, the staff turned her side to side and cleaned her up. On [DATE] at 9:05 a.m., Resident C's clinical record was reviewed. Resident C had diagnoses that included, not limited to, Hypertension, chronic kidney disease stage 3, spondylolistheses, multiple sites in spine. An MDS (Minimum Data Set) quarterly assessment dated [DATE], indicated C's cognition was intact, physical help in part of bathing, one person assist. Care plans were reviewed and included, not limited to, Resident preferences for daily care and care planning include: Shower: 2x weekly, bathing time of day: no preference, revision on [DATE]. Bathing documentation was revived for June and July of 2022 and contained the following: 6/3- bed bath 6/7- bed bath 6/14- bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-03-04 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post accurate actual hours worked for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift daily for 4 of 5 days during the annual survey period. Finding includes: During an observation on 2/26/24 at 12:24 P.M. a posted nursing staffing data sheet was observed on the wall in the lobby near the entrance to the main stairwell. The sheet included, but was not limited to, the following information: Census, total number of staff for each shift and total hours of each shift for CNA (Certified Nurse Aide), LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), Med Tech (Qualified Medication Aide), and RN (Registered Nurse) with Administration Duties. The sheet did not specify which actual hours were worked by each discipline during the specified shift when the total hours were not equal to the number of staff. During an observation on 2/27/24 at 3:03 P.M. a posted nursing staffing data sheet was observed on the wall in the lobby near the entrance to the main stairwell. The sheet included, but was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$53,454 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $43,230 — penalty dated 2025-04-09
- $10,224 — penalty dated 2024-03-04
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to APERION CARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAVIESS COUNTY HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/01/2017 |
| LEWIS, MERRAL | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| MCNEELY, TERI | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| STEINER, DERON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/01/2017 |
| CONROY, TRACY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/01/2017 |
| RODEWALD, AMANDA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/01/2017 |
| APERION CARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| APERION CARE LINCOLN, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| BERKOWITZ, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| GOLDFARB, BRIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| HOFFMAN, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| MEYSTEL, JAY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| MEYSTEL, YOSEF | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| ULBERT, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2024 |
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155820. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.