Aperion Care Monroe

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 38 beds and averages 31.6 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment for 2 of 9 resident rooms and 1 of 1 sit to stand mechanical lift. The sit to stand mechanical lift was dirty and resident rooms had flies and gnats. (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], Sit to Stand mechanical lift) Findings include:1. On 6/18/26 at 10:45 a.m., the foot platform of the sit to stand lift in the north hallway was observed to contain food crumbs and debris. On 6/19/26 at 9:50 a.m., the foot platform of the sit to stand lift in the north hallway was observed to contain food crumbs and debris. On 6/22/26 at 10:50 a.m., the foot platform of the sit to stand lift in the north hallway was observed to contain food crumbs and debris. 2. On 6/18/26 at 10:50 a.m., numerous flies and gnats were observed flying in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 6/19/26 at 9:55 a.m., numerous flies and gnats were observed flying in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 6/22/26 at 11:00 a.m., numerous flies and gnats were observed flying in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff prepared food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. This had the potential to affect 31 out of 31 residents served from the kitchen.Findings include:During a kitchen tour on 8/3/25 at 10:45 a.m., a large pork loin was observed thawing in the bottom of a three compartment sink with running water flowing onto the meat. The meat was not submerged in water and the water was flowing down the drain.During an interview on 8/6/25 at 12:25 p.m., the Dietary Manager indicated the cook should have had the meat in a deep pot while the water was running onto the meat. On 8/3/25 at 11:05 a.m., the Administrator provided the facility policy, Thawing Foods, and indicated it was the policy currently being used. A review of the policy indicated, . 4. Thawing foods under cool running potable water (This process is not recommended and should only be used in an emergency and if you cook food immediately) . b. Food items should be completely submerged under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and clinical records, the facility failed to ensure flies and gnats were not present in 1 of 10 resident rooms (Resident 5, Resident 6, Resident 25), sit to stand lift foot platforms were clean for 2 of 2 sit to stand lifts used by 3 residents (Resident 2, Resident 17, Resident 26), and exposed wires were covered for 1 of 4 communal resident bathrooms observed for environmental concerns. Findings include: 1. On 8/3/25 at 1:47 p.m., 8/5/25 at 2:20 p.m., and 8/6/25 at 10:15 a.m., gnats and flies were observed in the room of Resident 5, Resident 6, and Resident 25 on the privacy curtains, walls, bedside tables, and the residents themselves. During an interview on 8/16/25 at 10:17 a.m., Resident 6 indicated there were flies and gnats in the room all the time unless it was wintertime. During an interview on 8/16/25 at 10:18 a.m., Resident 25 indicated there were almost always gnats and flies in the room. He frequently fashioned a fly and gnat swatter out of paper to combat the pests. 2. On 8/3/25 at 9:45 a.m. and 2:50 p.m., and 8/4/25 at 9:30 a.m. and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to be informed of and participate in their treatment for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 7 and Resident 33)Findings include:1. On 8/5/25 at 11:00 a.m., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder (a condition characterized by a combination of schizophrenia and mood disorder symptoms), psychosis (a mental health condition where a person experiences a disconnect from reality), generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life).A review of the physician's orders indicated the following:On 7/8/25, an order for Lorazepam (a medication used to treat anxiety) 1 mg (milligram) twice daily was prescribed for generalized anxiety disorder.On 7/9/25, an order for Cymbalta (a medication used to treat depression) 60 mg once daily, to be taken with Cymbalta 30 mg to equal 90 mg, was prescribed for major…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's representative and physician was notified of significant weight loss for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 25)Findings include: During an interview on 8/3/25 at 1:44 p.m., Resident 25 indicated in the last month, he had lost weight. On 8/5/25 at 12:24 p.m., Resident 25 was observed to be eating lunch. On 8/5/25 at 11:09 a.m., Resident 25's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizophrenia and hypertension. Resident 25's weight indicated the following:-On 6/3/25, Resident 25 weighed 156 pounds -On 7/9/25, Resident 25 weighed 144 pounds which was a 7.69% weight loss in a month. -On 7/28/25, Resident 25 weighed 140 pounds. The care plan, dated 1/20/23, indicated Resident 25 was at nutritional risk due to schizophrenia. The intervention was to report to the physician as needed of significant weight loss of 5% or greater in a month and to weigh resident and record as ordered. The Nutrition Progress note, dated 7/10/25 at 10:17 am,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff submitted a comprehensive assessment within 14 days of a resident's discharge for 1 of 15 residents reviewed for MDS assessments and timing (Resident 13).Finding includes: On 8/4/25 at 10:19 a.m., Resident 13's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and sacral pressure ulcer. A 7/17/25 progress note indicated the resident was sent to the hospital for a bleeding sacral wound and was admitted after she had wound surgery to stop the bleeding. A 7/17/25 discharge MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was listed as 'in process' and incomplete. The assessment reference date (ARD) was 7/17/25. During an interview on 8/6/25 at 1:19 p.m., the Director of Nursing indicated the facility was aware of the incomplete MDS assessment and the corporate staff was working to complete it.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment for 1 of 15 residents reviewed for MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment accuracy. (Resident 27)Findings include: On 8/4/25 Resident 27's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, traumatic brain injury (an injury to the brain caused by an external force) and major depressive disorder. A review of the physician orders dated 3/25/25, indicated Resident 27 was prescribed Alprazolam (a medication used to treat anxiety disorders) for a diagnosis of anxiety. The resident's MAR indicated this remained an active order. A review of the provider progress note, dated 6/10/25, indicated the resident had an active diagnosis of anxiety. A review of the Resident 27's care plan, dated 9/16/24, indicated the resident used anti-anxiety medications.A review of the Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 6/30/25, indicated anxiety was not marked as an active diagnosis. During an interview with the DON (Director of Nursing) on 8/6/25 at 9:40 a.m., she indicated the resident had an active…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident received nutritional supplement for a resident with an assessed weight loss for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 25)Findings include: During an interview on 8/3/25 at 1:44 p.m., Resident 25 indicated in the last month he had lost weight. On 8/4/25 at 12:42 p.m., Resident 25 was observed to be resting in his bed. His lunch tray was observed to be in his room with no ice cream on the lunch tray. On 8/5/25 at 12:24 p.m., Resident 25 was observed to be eating lunch. No ice cream was observed on his lunch tray or on his meal ticket. During an interview on 8/5/25 at 1:45 p.m., Resident 25 indicated he did not get ice cream on his lunch tray. On 8/5/25 at 11:09 a.m., Resident 25's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to schizophrenia and hypertension. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/26/25, indicated Resident 25 was cognitively intact. Resident 25's weight indicated the following:-On 6/3/25, Resident 25 weighed 156 pounds…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the written notification required for a transfer and discharge was provided to the resident and the resident representative for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 33) Findings include: Residents 33's clinical record was reviewed on 10/22/24 at 2:02 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and fracture of the left femur. Resident 33's progress notes indicated the resident was sent to the hospital on 9/30/24. The clinical record lacked documentation the written notification of the Transfer and Discharge forms were provided to the resident and the resident representative. During an interview on 10/24/24 at 2:45 p.m., the Administrator indicated the forms were sent in writing to the resident representative but was not documented. On 10/25/24 at 12:09 p.m., the Administrator provided the facility's policy,Discharge Transfer of Resident, dated 11/28/12, and indicated it was the policy currently being used by the facility. A review of the policy did not indicate sending the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the notification of the bed hold policy required for a resident who transferred to the hospital was provided in writing to the resident or the resident representative for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 33) Findings include: Residents 33's clinical record was reviewed on 10/22/24 at 2:02 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and fracture of the left femur. Resident 33's progress notes indicated the resident was sent to the hospital on 9/30/24. The clinical record lacked documentation the written notification which specified the facility's bed hold policy was provided to the resident or the resident representative. During an interview on 10/24/24 at 2:45 p.m., the Administrator indicated the forms were sent in writing to the resident representative but was not documented. On 10/25/24 at 12:09 p.m., the Administrator provided the facility's policy,Bed Hold and Return to Facility, dated 11/28/12, and indicated it was the policy currently being used by the facility. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to APERION CARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $911K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN