Aperion Care Kokomo

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 56.1 residents a day — about 53% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who entered the facility without a pressure ulcer did not develop a pressure ulcer and a wound assessment was completed when the wound was discovered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident C) This deficient practice resulted in Resident C developing a pressure ulcer which was not discovered until it was a stage III (a serious full-thickness skin injury appearing as a deep, crater-like wound which exposes subcutaneous fat) The deficient practice was corrected on 12/2/25, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance.Findings include:During an observation, on 2/3/26 at 9:52 a.m., Resident C was lying in his bed. His coccyx dressing was dated 2/3/26. He indicated the dressing was changed a few minutes ago.During an interview, on 2/4/26 at 1:25 p.m., Resident C indicated the staff found the sore on his coccyx area when they bathed him. He had complained to staff it was very sore back there prior to them finding the wound.The clinical record for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2023-09-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from mental and verbal abuse and intimidation, failed to ensure a staff member intervened while a resident was being mentally and verbally abused and intimidated, and failed to provide 72-hour psychosocial follow-up for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) Resident B indicated while being abused by the Executive Director, she thought she was going to be hit, her personal space was invaded, she was in fear for her life, and following the incident she thought the Executive Director (ED) sent an unidentified man hit man into the facility to harm her in retaliation for the ED being suspended. Finding includes: On 9/28/23 at 9:45 a.m., the Business Office Manager (BOM) indicated the previous ED was no longer the ED at the facility anymore. A document, titled Indiana State Department of Health Survey Report System, dated 9/28/23 at 12:39 p.m., indicated on 9/20/23 at 9:15 a.m., during a meeting between the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure equipment settings for prescribed oxygen flow rates were include in the clinical record for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 52, 40, 34 and 36)Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 8/10/25 at 1:22 p.m., Resident 52 had oxygen per nasal cannula set at a flow rate of 3 and 1/2 liters per minute (L). During an observation, on 8/11/25 at 9:28 a.m., Resident 52 had oxygen per nasal cannula set at a flow rate of 4L. During an observation, on 8/12/25 at 10:12 a.m., Resident 52 had oxygen per nasal cannula set at a flow rate of 4L. During an observation, on 8/14/25 at 10:26 a.m., Resident 52 had oxygen per nasal cannula set at a flow rate of 5L. The clinical record for Resident 52 was reviewed on 8/12/25 at 10:32 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, osteoarthritis, dementia without behavioral psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. A care plan, dated 1/17/22, indicated Resident 52 was at risk for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident or resident's representative received notification in writing of the facility's bed hold policy and the reason for the resident's transfer and discharge to the hospital for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 36)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 36 was reviewed on 8/12/25 at 11:59 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left side, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, morbid obesity, anxiety, insomnia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, dysphagia, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, a history of urinary tract infection, and kidney stones. A nursing progress note, dated 7/14/25 at 12:13 p.m., indicated Resident 36 had an altered level of consciousness and was sent to the emergency room via ambulance.A nursing progress note, dated 7/21/25 at 4:45 p.m., indicated Resident 36 was transported back to the facility from the hospital via ambulance.The clinical record did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed related to hypertension, heart failure, and anticoagulation therapy for 1 of 20 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident 52)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 50 was reviewed on 8/12/25 at 10:32 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, chronic systolic congestive heart failure, hypertension, acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins, and history of pulmonary embolism. A physician's order, dated 7/8/25, indicated to administer apixaban (an anticoagulant medication) 5 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time daily.The care plans for Resident 50 did not include a care plan for hypertension, heart failure, or the use of anticoagulant medication. During an interview, on 8/13/25 at 1:22 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated there were no care plans for hypertension, heart failure, or the use of anticoagulant medication. There should have been care plans in place.A current facility policy, titled Comprehensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was followed according to the ordered parameters for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 50)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 50 was reviewed on 8/12/25 at 10:32 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, chronic systolic congestive heart failure, hypertension, acute embolism and thrombosis of the deep veins, and a history of pulmonary embolism. A physician's order, dated 7/8/25, indicated give metoprolol tartrate (used to treat high blood pressure) by mouth two times a day for hypertension and to hold the medication for a systolic blood pressure of less than 120 or a heart rate of less than 60.A medication administration record (MAR), dated 7/1/25 through 7/31/25, indicated metoprolol was administered outside of the ordered parameters on:a. the morning of 7/25/25 with a systolic blood pressure of 109.b. the evening of 7/11/25 with a systolic blood pressure of 111.c. the evening of 7/14/25 with a systolic blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-03 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's specialized wheelchair was treated with respect when the wheelchair was unable to be located after his discharge from the facility for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for personal property. (Resident B) Finding includes: A document, titled Intake Information, dated 11/22/24, indicated an anonymous person notified the Indiana Department of Health Resident B was loaned a Quickie QRI blue wheelchair from a specialized wheelchair company, when he was discharged from the rehabilitation hospital on 7/12/24. After he was admitted to the facility, he was placed in bed, and he never saw the loaner wheelchair again. He was transferred to the hospital on 7/30/24, and never returned to the facility. The facility was unable to find the loaner specialty wheelchair the resident was admitted to the facility in and his insurance company was being charged for the loaner chair. During an interview, on 12/2/24 at 12:05 p.m., the Executive Director (ED) indicated Resident B was transported to the facility from the hospital on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed an accurate admission assessment of a resident's pressure ulcer by a licensed nurse qualified to assess pressure wounds according to their policy and procedure for 1 of 1 new admission reviewed for a pressure ulcer. (Resident B) Finding includes: During a phone interview, on 12/2/24 at 12:31 p.m., a confidential interviewee indicated Resident B had a pressure ulcer which was almost healed when he arrived at this facility, on 7/12/24, but when he left the facility to be hospitalized on [DATE], the pressure ulcer on his coccyx was a Stage 4. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 12/2/24 at 1:19 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, flaccid neuropathic bladder, complete paraplegia, and muscle wasting and atrophy. A rehabilitation hospital document, titled Wound Care Note, dated 6/21/24, from Resident B's admission prior to his admission to the facility indicated on admission to the hospital he presented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff anchored an indwelling catheter with proper placement into a resident's bladder for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for an indwelling catheter. (Resident B) Finding includes: During a phone interview, on 12/2/24 at 12:31 p.m., a confidential interviewee indicated prior to Resident B being admitted to the hospital on [DATE], two nurses placed indwelling catheters in the wrong place and caused trauma to his urinary tube. The first nurse put too large of a tube in, and it had to be removed because of the blood in the catheter, then the second nurse put too large of a catheter in as well and it was inserted in the wrong place. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 12/2/24 at 1:19 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, flaccid neuropathic bladder, complete paraplegia, and muscle wasting and atrophy. A nursing progress note, dated 7/29/24 at 10:50 a.m., indicated an indwelling catheter size 16 French/10 cubic centimeter (cc)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was able to receive personal funds when requested for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for personal funds. (Resident 36) Finding includes: During an interview, on 9/16/24 at 11:17 a.m., Resident 36 indicated she asked several times to get money from her account and she was not able to get money out of her account. An email, dated 9/17/24, from the Corporate Business Office Manager indicated she had deposited the resident's check into the AR side instead of her RFMS (Resident Fund Management Service) account. During an interview, on 9/23/24 at 9:27 a.m., the Administrator indicated the facility did not have a business office manager. The Corporate Business Office Manager was covering multiple facilities. During an interview, on 9/23/24 at 10:00 a.m., the Administrator indicated when the resident was discharged to another facility they cancelled Resident 36's funds. When the resident was readmitted , her funds were messed up. The resident's funds could take more than 30 days to get resolved. During an interview, on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was reviewed and revised as appropriate for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 23) Finding includes: During daily observations, on 9/16/24, 9/17/24, 9/18/24, 9/19/24 and 9/20/24, a mattress was noted on the floor on the right side of Resident 23's bed with the left side of the bed positioned against the half wall in the room. The clinical record for Resident 23 was reviewed on 9/17/24 at 3:22 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, seizures, schizoaffective disorder, depression, pseudobulbar affect, dementia- moderate with behavioral disturbance, cerebellar ataxia, bipolar disorder, chronic kidney disease-stage 3, intellectual disabilities, and atrial flutter. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/26/24, indicated Resident 23 was discharged to an inpatient psychiatric facility and was expected to return to the facility. The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer oxygen at the correct flow rate as ordered by the physician for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents 32 and 43) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 9/16/24 at 4:03 p.m., Resident 32 was receiving oxygen at a flow rate of 2 liters per minute (LPM) via a nasal canula. During an observation, on 9/17/24 at 9:15 a.m., Resident 32 was receiving oxygen at a flow rate of 2 LPM via a nasal canula. During an observation, on 9/18/24 at 11:35 a.m., the resident was receiving oxygen at a flow rate of 2 LPM via a nasal canula. During an observation, on 9/19/24 at 1:29 p.m., Resident 32 was receiving oxygen at a flow rate of 2 LPM via a nasal canula. The clinical record for Resident 32 was reviewed on 9/19/24 at 12:35 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen in the body), asthma, atrial fibrillation, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and anxiety disorder. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to APERION CARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN