Alta Rehab At Wauconda

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 694 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 37.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 332 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 149 beds and averages 144.2 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.06 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.16 to 0.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was positioned in a safe manner for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of three. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing a fall which required sutures and resulted in R1 obtaining a small subdural hematoma. The findings include: R1's Face Sheet shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including alcohol abuse, fall from bed, mood disorder, vascular dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, Parkinson's disease, and malnutrition. R1's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE], shows that R1 is at risk for falls. R1's Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], shows R1 is not cognitively intact, has an impairment on both upper and lower extremities, is dependent (helper does ALL of the effort. Resident does none of the effort to complete the activity. Or the assistance of two or more helpers is required for the resident to complete the activity) on staff for toileting, personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure reducing interventions were in place for residents with pressure injuries for 2 of 8 residents (R106, R183) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 28. This failure resulted in R106's coccyx excoriation progressing to an unstageable pressure injury and R183's Stage 3 coccyx pressure injury advancing to an unstageable pressure injury. The findings include: 1. On 07/24/23 at 10:34 AM, R106 was in her room, sitting up in her wheelchair on a flattened pillow. R106 said she has a dressing on the sore on her bottom. R106 said the wound doctor comes, but her wound is not getting better. R106 said the wound doctor did a procedure the last time and her bottom is very inflamed and burns. R106 did not have a pressure reducing cushion in her wheelchair or a pressure reducing air mattress on her bed. On 07/24/23 at 12:57 PM, R106 was sitting in her wheelchair in the dining room on a flattened pillow. R106's Most Recent Skin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to determine the residents' wishes upon admission for advanced directives. This applies to one of three residents (R1) in the sample of seven reviewed for advanced directives.The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview and record review that the deficiency practice occurred on [DATE] and was corrected on [DATE], prior to the start of this survey and was therefore past noncompliance.The findings include:The facility face sheet for R1 shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. The diagnoses for R1 include but are not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, urinary tract infection and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The section of the face sheet for advanced directive is blank. The admission observation form dated [DATE] shows R1 was alert and orientated to person, place, time and situation.A nursing note dated [DATE] shows R1 was admitted to the facility with altered mental status and was alert and oriented but was forgetful. No…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to communicate and document a fall incident in a timely manner, failed to a complete a post fall assessment or perform any subsequent assessments following a fall, and failed to implement interventions to prevent any future incidents. This failure affects one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls in the sample of 3.The findings include:R1's face sheet documented an admission date of 01/06/2026 from an acute care hospital where she was hospitalized from [DATE] through 01/06/2026. Her past medical history upon admission included but not limited to seizures, anemia, hypertension, anxiety, osteoarthritis to left wrist, and chronic kidney disease. (Review of R1's census record indicates she is on hospital leave.)R1's fall risk assessment with effective date 01/06/2026 (same day as admission) documented score of 8 which indicated R1 is not at risk for falls. Assessment with effective date of 01/08/2026 (signed on 01/16/2026) documented score of 14 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 4. The findings include: The facility's Incident Report for R1 shows on 12/23/24 resident was overheard in the dining room (during breakfast) stating that she was abused by a CNA (certified nursing assistant) on the previous day. Social Service Designee interviewed the resident who claimed that the day before she overheard a CNA and an Activity Aide arguing in the hallway. According to the resident, she tried to intervene and tell them to stop, and the CNA allegedly pointed her finger in the resident's face and used profanity at her. On 12/30/24 at 9:47 AM, R1 was in her room re-arranging her things on her bed. R1 stated on 12/22/24 after breakfast, she heard yelling in her hall. R1 stated she went out of her room and as she got closer to the people yelling, she saw V6 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was yelling at V5 Activity Aid.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 4. The findings include: The facility's Incident Report for R1 shows on 12/23/24 resident was overheard in the dining room (during breakfast) stating that she was abused by a CNA on the previous day. Social Service Designee interviewed the resident who claimed that the day before she overheard a CNA and an Activity Aide arguing in the hallway. According to the resident, she tried to intervene and tell them to stop, and the CNA allegedly pointed her finger in the resident's face and used profanity at her. On 12/30/24 at 9:20 AM, V1 Administrator said the incident was determined to be a 2 staff verbal altercation witnessed by R1. V1 said the initial report said R1 used profanity at her, but as they interviewed staff, the profanity was toward the other staff and not the resident. V1 said they did not substantiate abuse. On 12/30/24 at 9:47 AM, R1 was in her room re-arranging her things on her bed. R1 said…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred in a safe manner for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for safety in the sample of 3. The findings include: On 12/9/24 at 12:55 PM, R2's room had handwritten signs above her bed and on the wall by the bathroom that said, Fall Risk, Use Gait Belt. On 12/9/24 at 12:57 AM, R2 was sitting in her wheelchair at the dining room table. R2 stated when she first got to the facility she walked to the bathroom with her walker. R2 stated when she was coming out of the bathroom, V13 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was with her, and she started to fall. R2 stated V13 assisted her to the floor. R2 stated V13 did not put a gait belt on her. R2 stated they should use a gait belt, now I make sure! On 12/9/24 at 1:34 PM, V13 stated R2 had walked with the walker to the bathroom by herself. V13 stated she assisted R2 to walk out of the bathroom with the walker and R2's legs got weak. V13 stated she assisted R2 to the floor. V13 stated she was holding R2's pants and did not have a gait belt on R2. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess and monitor a resident after a fall for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's Final Incident Report shows that R1 had an assisted fall on 10/11/14. R1 had an X-ray done on 10/14/24 that showed an acute nondisplaced oblique distal radial fracture with soft tissue swelling. On 11/4/24 at 9:19 AM, R1 was sitting in her wheelchair in her room. R1 had a brace on her left wrist and was unable to move her left arm. On 11/4/24 at 9:19 AM, R1 stated that she had a fall in the bathroom. R1 stated that she must have hit her left arm on the wheelchair when she fell. R1 stated that after she fell, the nurse came in and helped her back up into the wheelchair. R1 stated that it did not appear that the nurse did any type of assessment after the fall. R1 stated that she had pain and tingling in her left arm right after the fall. On 11/4/24 at 1:32 PM, V6 (Registered Nurse) stated that she was the nurse on duty when R1 fell. V6 stated that she was alerted by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify a physician prior to and after holding a blood pressure medication. This applies to 1 of 27 residents (R84) reviewed for notification of changes in the sample of 27. The findings include: R84's August 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) shows, Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg (milligrams), give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to essential hypertension (high blood pressure) and Lisinopril 20 mg tab, give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to essential hypertension. The same report shows, both medications were held on August 1st, 5th & 18th, 2024. R84's electronic medical record shows, her physician was not notified on August 1st, 5th or 18th, 2024 of her blood pressure medication being held. On August 19,2024 at 10:17 AM, V16 LPN stated, whenever they hold a medication, they contact the doctor and let them know. The facility's physician-family notification-change in condition dated November 13, 2018 shows, Purpose: To ensure that medical care problems are communicated to the attending physician or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer prevention interventions for a resident who is at risk for developing pressure ulcers for 1 of 5 residents (R9) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 27. The findings include: On 8/19/24 at 10:12 AM, R9 was laying in bed. R9 did not have blankets on and R9's heels were observed directly on her mattress (not a low air loss mattress). R9 stated that she is not sure if she has wounds on her heels or not, but they are a little tender. R9 also stated that she is supposed to wear pressure relieving boots but sometimes they do not put them on. R9's pressure relieving boots were sitting in the chair in R9's room. At 11:45 AM, R9's heels were still directly on the bed and her boots were still in her chair. On 8/20/24 at 1:03 PM, V20 (Wound Registered Nurse) stated R9 is at risk for developing pressure ulcers and should have her heels offloaded to prevent pressure ulcers. V20 stated that R9's heels should not be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow occupational therapy recommendations for a resident with a contracted hand. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R70) reviewed for range of motion/restorative in the sample of 27. The findings include: R70's face sheet lists his diagnoses to include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. On August 19, 2024, at 10:30 AM, R70 was lying in bed. All 4 of his fingers were bent in a fist like shape on his right hand. He stated, he can open his fingers some but not all the way. His hand was not like that when he came to the facility and has gotten worse. He tries to do hand exercises. The facility does not do any exercises/anything with his hand. On August 20, 2024, at 9:20 AM, R70 was lying in bed. His hand was in the same position as the day before. On August 21, 2024, at 9:34 AM, V17 Occupational Therapy (OT) Assistant stated, R70 has a non-fixed contracture to his right hand. They were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to safely transfer a resident by preventing the resident's head from hitting the mechanical lift, failed to safely transport a resident and failed to update a resident's care plan after a fall. This applies to 2 of 27 residents (R19 and R5) reviewed for safety in the sample of 27. The findings include: 1. R19's Face Sheet showed R19 was a [AGE] year-old female with the diagnoses of dementia and anxiety. On 08/19/24 at 10:10 AM, R19 was sitting in her wheelchair. R19 had bruising to the left side of her forehead. The bruising started at R19's hairline and extended down to her left eyebrow. The bruising was about the width of R19's eyebrow/eye. The bruised area had a darker purple area about the size of a quarter near R19's hairline. R19's Skin- Other Skin Condition Report dated 8/14/24 showed R19 hit her forehead on a mechanical lift resulting in a red area to R19's forehead and ice was applied. On 08/20/24 at 09:01 AM, V4 (Certified Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to APERION CARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

What families pay in IL