Aperion Care Peru

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 10.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 75.2 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment in resident rooms and resident areas for three of four halls. (100 Hall, 200 Hall and 400 Hall)Finding includes:During the initial observations of residents, conducted between 1/25/2025 at 11:04 A.M. through /27/2025 at 2:30 P.M, the following observations were made:-In room [ROOM NUMBER], the inside of the door was missing paint in numerous areas.-In room [ROOM NUMBER], the inside of door had paint scraped off in several places.-In room [ROOM NUMBER], the door had multiple scrapes without paint and the wall next to the resident's bed was dirty. -In room [ROOM NUMBER], the bathroom ceiling vent above the shower had a heavy build-up of dust and there was blue masking tape wrapped around the smoke alarm.-In room [ROOM NUMBER], the wall surrounding the window was buckled and cracked. -In room [ROOM NUMBER], there were three holes behind the bed.-In room [ROOM NUMBER], the window well above the window…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secure on 2 of 4 carts observed and in 1 of 16 resident rooms) (Wound Cart, South Treatment Cart and Resident 14's room) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 1/25/2026 at 10:55 P.M., the South Treatment Cart was unlocked and had medicated ointments, powders and sharp supplies, such as needles and scissors noted in the cart. During an interview on 1/25/2026 at 11:01 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 indicated the Treatment Cart was unlocked. 2. During an observation 1/27/2025 at 9:45 A.M., the Wound Treatment Cart was unlocked and contained medicated ointments, powders and sharp supplies, such as needles and scissors in the cart. During an interview on 1/27/2025 at 9:50 A.M., Registered Nurse 3 indicated she had been responsible for the Wound Treatment Cart and the cart was not locked. 3. Upon entering the room of resident 14 on 1/25/2026 at 11:08 A.M , a medication cup with 10 pills was observed on the bedside tray. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to communicate with staff providing services was protected for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Resident's rights. (Resident 36)Finding includes:During an interview and observation on 1/27/2026 at 11:01 A.M., Resident 36 indicated, There he is ., and further stated he is a great guy when Employee 6 arrived to deliver the resident's clean laundry. However, Employee 6 did not acknowledge Resident 36 after the resident made the statements nor did the employee attempt to communicate with the resident. When Employee 6 was putting the Resident 36's clothes in his closet, the resident again indicated, There is my guy and attempted to engage the employee with conversation, but Employee 6 never acknowledged the resident before he put away the resident's clean laundry and left the room. During an interview on 1/27/2026 at 11:03 A.M., Employee 6 was asked if he could answer a few questions but he walked away without responding. Employee 6 was wearing a pink colored earbud in both of his ears. During an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant weight loss for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for nutrition. Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 52 was reviewed on 1/28/2026 at 10:34 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, anxiety and dementia. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed as a quarterly review, on 12/1/2025 indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required supervision for eating needs. Nursing Progress notes indicated on 12/3/2025, the resident weighed 108.5 pounds. On 1/6/2026, the resident weighed 104.5 pounds a -3.69% loss in one month.On 1/6/2026, the resident weighed 104.5 pounds, on 1/30/2026, the resident weighed 99 pounds a -5.26% loss in less than a month. There was no documentation the physician had been notified of the significant weight loss.On 8/5/2025, the resident weighed 117 pounds, on 1/30/2026, the resident weighed 99 pounds a -15.38% loss in less than 6 months.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered comprehensive care plan was updated for a resident with a significant weight loss for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 52)Findings include:The record for Resident 52 was reviewed on 1/28/2026 at 10:34 A.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, anxiety and dementia. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed as a quarterly review on 12/1/2025, indicated Resident 52 had severe cognitive impairment, required supervision for eating needs and was a smoker. Resident 52 was observed, on 01/25/2026 at 10:40 AM, walking around the unit. She was thin, her skin was dry and flaky and her clothes did not fit and were loose and baggy.A current care plan, initiated on 12/10/2024, indicated the following problem: I have an unplanned/unexpected weight gain related to improved intake.(sic) The goal for the plan was . The interventions included. The plan indicated it had been reviewed on 12/9/2025 but there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers or bed baths for a dependent resident for 1 of 4 residents who were reviewed for Activities of Daily Living needs. (Resident 3)Finding includes: During an observation on 1/25/2026 at 12:08 P.M., Resident 3's hair was sticking up and was unbrushed. During an interview on 1/25/2026 at 1:59 P.M., Resident 3's right hand was sticky and she was unable to recall the last time she had had a shower. Resident 3's record review was completed on 1/28/2025 at 10:30 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: schizophrenia, epilepsy, major depressive disorder, dementia with moderate behavioral disturbances and generalized anxiety disorder. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/9/2025, indicated Resident 3 had clear speech, usually made herself understood and had been able to understand others, had severe cognitive impairment, had had no behaviors and had not rejected care and was dependent on staff for all transfers and for showering or bed baths needs. Resident 3's January showers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement physician recommendations in a timely manner after a fall with injury for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for falls. (Resident 5)Finding includes:During an interview, on 1/27/2026 at 2:23 P.M., Resident 5 indicated he had a recent fall and had elbow pain.During an interview and observation, on 1/29/2026 at 8:51 A.M., Resident 5 indicated his elbow painful and there was obvious swelling around the elbow. In addition he wore a compression stocking on his right arm.During an observation, on 1/30/2026 at 9:15 A.M., Resident 5 was observed to have purple and red bruising below and above the left elbow.A record review for Resident 5 was completed on 1/28/2026 at 9:15 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: neuropathy, gout, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus type 2 and schizoaffective disorder.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/3/2025, indicated Resident 5 had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision for transfers. A Nursing Progress Note, on 1/25/2026 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a timely nutritional assessment and initiate interventions to prevent weight loss for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 52) This resulted in continued significant weight loss of 15.38% over the previous 5 months. Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 52 was reviewed on 1/28/2026 at 10:34 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, anxiety and dementia. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed for a quarterly review, on 12/1/2025, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required supervision for eating needs and was a smoker. Resident 52 was observed, on 01/25/2026 at 10:40 AM walking around the nursing unit. She was thin, her skin was dry and flaky, her clothes were loose, baggy and did not fit her. A care plan dated 12/10/2024, indicated I have a nutritional problem or potential nutritional problems related to Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, chronic obstructive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain ordered laboratory orders for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 1)Finding includes:A record review for resident 1 was completed on 1/28/2026 at 10:00 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: bipolar disorder, hepatitis C, diabetes mellitus and history of alcohol use. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDs) assessment, dated 12/18/2025, indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment and was administered medication of an antipsychotic, antidepressant, opioid and anticonvulsant.A Physician's Order, dated 11/18/2024, indicated laboratory orders for a prealbumin, vitamin D, vitamin B12 and folate level annually in October. However, these laboratory values, due in October 2025, could not be located in the medical record, nor provided by the laboratory facility.During an interview, on 1/30/2026 at 9:02 A.M., LPN 3 indicted the ordered laboratory values could not be located and the laboratory orders should have been drawn.A current policy was provided by the Executive Director, on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete dental recommendations from the in-house dentist for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dental care. (Resident 77) Finding includes:During an interview, on 1/25/2026 at 1:59 P.M. Resident 77 indicated he had mouth pain due to something messing with his teeth. He indicated, I have some cavities.A record review for Resident 77 was completed on 1/28/2026 at 1:05 P.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: diabetes mellitus type 2, dementia and obstructive sleep apnea.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/3/2025, indicated Resident 77 had severe cognitive impairment and had no dental issues.A Physician's Order, dated 1/2/2025, indicated dental care as needed.A Dental Consult Note, dated 12/8/2025, indicated Resident 77 had upper right mouth pain sometimes and lower left nerve pain if his tongue touched his teeth. Resident 77 also had a draining fistula between teeth number 20 and 21 (lower left bicuspids). An outside referral for full mouth extraction was made.A Dental Hygienist Encounter Form, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to APERION CARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN