Aperion Care Westchester

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 29.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 115.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.93 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.04 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop an effective plan to prevent and/or reduce the risk of falling for a resident identified to at high risk for falls, and failed to follow their fall prevention protocol to complete fall risk assessments quarterly and accurately assess and document fall risk factors. This affected 6 of 6 residents (R1, R2, R4, R5, R6 and R7) reviewed for falls and fall risk assessments. This failure resulted in R1 having multiple falls R1 had a fall in his room on 8/27/24 at 7:45AM, and then another fall same day at 1:47PM in the dining room that resulted laceration in left side eye brow forehead requiring sutures on 8/27/24 and third fall on 9/12/24 in the dining room that resulted in left eyebrow laceration re-opening. Findings Include: R1 is [AGE] year old resident and still currently in the facility. BIMs score of 2 (severe cognitive impairment). Fall risk assessment dated [DATE] scored 13, and on 9/13/24 scored 14. On 10/24/24 at 9:30AM, V12 (Restorative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-06-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform pressure ulcer dressing changes as ordered by the physician for 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 9. This failure resulted in R1 developing an infected right heel pressure wound. The findings include: 1. R1's Wound Assessment Report dated 2/4/24 shows that she admitted to the facility with an unstageable pressure ulcer on her right heel measuring 5.5 cm (centimeters) x 6.8 cm x 0.1 cm with light serosanguineous (pink thin fluid secreted from wounds in the healing process) drainage present. R1's Wound Physician note dated 4/17/24 shows that R1's right heel pressure ulcer was now a stage 4 pressure ulcer measuring 8.5 cm x 5 cm x 1.9 cm. R1's right heel pressure ulcer had heavy purulent (thick pus like drainage from an infection) drainage and the wound progress was not at goal. That same report shows that Metronidazole (antibiotic) 250 mg crushed and sprinkled on wound daily for odor was ordered on 4/3/24 for 30 days. R1's Right Heel Wound Culture Report collected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect a confused and vulnerable resident (R1) from being physically abused by a staff member and failed to follow their abuse policy by not preventing staff to resident physical abuse. This failure resulted in R1 obtaining facial injuries with noted scratches with active bleeding, swelling, pain and bruising that required the resident to be transferred emergently to a local hospital for further evaluation. Findings include: R1's face sheet indicated that resident admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on [DATE] and has a past medical history not limited to: Alzheimer's Disease, Seizures, Vascular Dementia, Psychosis, Difficulty in Walking, Lack of Coordination, Weakness, Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Malignant Neoplasm of Brain, Atrial Flutter, Cerebral Infarction, and History of Falling. R1's Minimum Data Set Section C dated 11/13/2023 documented a score of BIMS (brief interview for mental status score) of 11…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform a physician of abnormal labs prior to a resident's change of condition of 4/03/2023 for one of thirty residents (R3) in the sample. This failure resulted in R3 having to be hospitalized due to acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, seizures, and hypernatremia. Findings Include: R3 is a [AGE] year old female who was originally admitted to the building on 7/26/2012 and still currently resides in the facility. R3 has multiple diagnoses including but not limited to the following: epilepsy, vitamin D deficiency, multiple sclerosis, severe protein calorie malnutrition, dementia, hypernatremia, hypokalemia, pressure inducted deep tissue damage, and gastrostomy. Facility lab report dated 4/3/23 shows in part but not limited to the following: blood urea nitrogen (BUN): 30 (High) and Sodium (Na): 157 mEq/L (Critically High). Facility progress note dated 4/5/23 states in part but not limited to the following: R3 was observed during rounds with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy by not reporting an allegation of physical abuse to the Illinois Department of Public Health's Regional Office for one out of three residents reviewed for abuse in a total sample of nine. Findings Include: R4 is a [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, mild cognitive impairment, and contracture of the right hand and wrist. On 5/27/26 at 12:52PM, R4 was able to state name and birthdate correctly. R4 stated the date was 5/20/16 and R4 was in [NAME], IL. When asked if R4 has any issues or concerns in the facility, R4 stated no. When asked if R4 felt safe in the facility, R4 stated no. R4 reported a lady tried to drown R4 in the shower last week. R4 was unsure of the exact date and was unable to name the CNA. R4 described the CNA as a black female with long black hair. R4 reported the CNA sprayed R4 in the face with the water hose. R4 stated R4 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that call lights were placed/secured within reach, failed to ensure that essential equipment was functioning, and failed to supervise an at risk for falls resident while outside smoking, This failure affects three of three residents (R1, R3, R4) reviewed for falls on the sample of four. Findings include:1.The (2/23/24-2/1/26) fall report affirms R1 fell on 3/18/24, 10/1/24, 12/8/24, 3/23/25, 8/12/25, 1/2/26, and 1/13/26 therefore seven (7) times within the last 24 months. R1's (3/18/24) fall occurrence note was requested, however was not received during the survey, on 3/5/26 at 1:40pm, V1 (Administrator) affirmed that the facility doesn't have it.R1's diagnoses include but not limited to dementia, bipolar disorder, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, difficulty walking and unspecified fall. R1's (1/9/26) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 7 (severe impairment). R1's (1/9/26) functional assessment affirms R1 requires substantial/maximal assistance with chair/bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to clarify physician orders, failed to ensure that the required rate for IV (Intravenous) infusion was ordered (prior to administration) and failed to document the rate of IV infusion for one of four residents (R2) reviewed for change in condition. Findings include:R2's care plan (revised 1/29/26) states the resident requires use of IV (Intravenous) fluids/medications related to hydration therapy. Interventions: Provide IV fluids as ordered. R2's (1/1/26) Physician Orders include Dextrose Intravenous Solution 5%. Use 2 liter intravenously one time only for dehydration for 2 days [infusion rate was excluded].R2's (January 2026) MAR (Medication Administration Record) includes Dextrose Intravenous Solution 5%. Use 2 liter intravenously one time only for dehydration for 2 days, which was documented as administered at 6:32pm, however the infusion rate was excluded.R2's (1/2/26) progress notes state, iv fluids d5 ns (normal saline) infusing and IV fluids continuous running however the infusion…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its Medication Administration Policy by failing to administer medications in a timely manner. This applies to four of 15 residents (R2, R7, R4 and R5) reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 15.The Findings include:On 9/23/25 at 10:12 AM, V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) was passing medication and stated, I have 10 more residents (R2, R3, R4, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R14, and R15) to pass the morning medications, which were supposed to be administered at 8:00 AM. We are supposed to administer medications within 2-hour window (one hour before and one hour after) around the scheduled time. I would be able to finish by 10:45 AM.R2 is an [AGE] year-old female with moderate cognitive impairment as per MDS dated [DATE]. On 9/24/25 at 12:30 PM, R2 stated (with Spanish interpreter V8/Housekeeping), I don't know what time I received my medications today. I would like to get my medications on time.A review of the R2's POS and MAR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to wear gloves while touching food while taking food temperatures before lunch was served, failed to wear beard nets and properly wear hair nets while in the kitchen area. This failure has the potential to affect all residents receiving meals in this facility. Findings include:The census on 7/22/25 was 114 residents. V12 DON (director of nursing) stated that there are four residents that are strict nothing by mouth.On 7/22/25 at 9:55 AM, V14 (cook), V15 (dietary aide), and V16 (dietary aide) were observed to have facial hair. V14, V15, and V16 were not wearing beard nets. V15 and V16 were observed with a hair net on head with hair extending below the hair net.On 7/22/25 at 10:40 AM, this surveyor observed a bag of hair nets and a bag of beard nets attached to door to the kitchen. V13 (dietary supervisor) arrived at the kitchen and placed a hair net on head with hair extending below the hair net.On 7/22/25 at 11:00 AM, V14 was observed preparing the gravy for the lunch meal service. V13 was not wearing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to have an effective pest control program and ensure the kitchen area was free from flying insects. This failure affects all residents that receive meals in this facility. Findings include:On 7/22/25 at 10:40 AM, this surveyor toured the facility's kitchen with V13 (dietary supervisor). In the pantry where canned goods are stored, there were several, too active to count, fruit flies present.On 7/22/25 at 10:50 AM, V13 stated that there is no food stored in the pantry. V13 stated they are just fruit flies. V13 stated that the outside pest control company came to facility yesterday and provided treatment in the kitchen.On 7/23/25 at 12:15 PM, V7 (maintenance director) stated that the outside pest control company are here today placing extra traps for fruit flies throughout facility, mostly in the kitchen. V7 stated that some fruit flies were observed under the dishwasher. V7 stated that V13 informed him yesterday afternoon of fruit flies in the kitchen.The outside pest control company's service inspection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, this facility failed to follow its policies and procedure to ensure resident received incontinence care at least every two hours or as needed, and failed to ensure a resident was positioned per physician order for feeding. This affected four residents (R103, R48, R61, and R113) reviewed for activities of daily living assisted by staff on the sample of 45.Findings include:On 7/22/25 at 12:25 PM, R48 was observed in reclining chair in dining room; head was raised 30 degrees. R48 was brought lunch tray. R48 was not repositioned, the chair back was not raised to the upright position. R48 was observed coughing after each bite taken.On 7/23/25 at 8:50 AM, R48 was observed in bed with head of bed raised 30 degrees. R48's breakfast tray was positioned in front of R48. V10 CNA (certified nurse aide) was observed in R48's room. R48 asked V10 to have the head of bed raised so R48 could eat breakfast. V10 stated that R48 can raise the head of bed herself and exited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the medication storage policy by having opened undated medication and expired medication of the medication cart. This affected four of four residents (R3, R74, R113 and R95) reviewed for labelling and storage in the sample of 45. Findings Include:R3 was diagnosis with Dementia Mellitus. R3's physician order dated [DATE] documents: Insulin lispro solution - Inject as per sliding scale (start date [DATE]). R74's physician order dated [DATE] documents: Brimonidine Tartrate Ophthalmic Solution 0.2 % (Brimonidine Tartrate) Instill 1 drop in right eye eve (start date [DATE])On [DATE] at 12:18pm, during medication cart inspection with V31 (nurse), R3 was observed with lispro insulin dispensed date [DATE] open and not dated. V31 said, R3's insulin was used, open and not dated. V31 said, R3's insulin should have been dated when it was initially opened. R74 was observed with Brimonidine eye drop dated [DATE]. V31 said, R74's eye drops are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed the facility failed to ensure staff wear gloves when handling soiled laundry and failed to follow the facility failed to follow its glucose testing policy by not placing a barrier between a used glucometer and the medication cart, and failed to perform hand hygiene and clean the glucometer while taking blood glucose levels. This affected two of two residents ( R7, R3) reviewed for infection control practices and residents residing on the 200 hall. Findings Include: The findings include: On 07/23/2025 at 11:00 AM V4, Laundry Aide, observed in the 200 hall removing laundry from 1st soiled bin. V4 wearing no gloves. V4 then pushed her laundry cart to a 2nd bin wearing no gloves and adjusted the bag inside, closed the bin and then went to 3rd laundry bin. V4 wore no gloves when removing or adjusting bags on the soiled laundry bins. At 11:04 AM V4 said they tell us not to wear gloves when collecting laundry in the hall way. On 07/23/2025 at 11:52 AM V6, Infection Preventionist, said gloves should be worn when handling gloves with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner by providing timely toileting assistance. This failure affected three residents (R48, R61, and R113) reviewed for resident rights on the sample of 45. Findings include:On 7/22/25 at 3:20 PM, R48 was observed sitting in the dining room. R48 stated that R48 was wet and staff won't change R48's brief. R48 stated that staff had not changed her brief since she got in reclining chair for breakfast.On 7/22/25 at 3:40 PM, V18 CNA (certified nurse aide) was observed providing incontinence care for R48. R48 was observed to have a saturated panty liner (13 inches x 28 inches) in a saturated brief.On 7/22/25 at 3:40 PM, V18 CNA stated that V18 provides incontinence care to assigned residents twice, once at the beginning of shift and once at end of shift.On 7/23/25 at 12:50 PM, R113's call light was observed to be activated. At 1:00 PM, when questioned if R113 needed staff assistance, R113 removed blanket and pointed to incontinence brief. When questioned if R113…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$53,141 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $38,948 — penalty dated 2024-06-28
• $14,193 — penalty dated 2023-12-03
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-18 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to APERION CARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL