Aperion Care Tolleston Park
2350 Taft St, Gary, IN 46404 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 178 certified beds · (219) 977-2600 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 33% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.0% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.7% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 89.8% | 25.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 3.9% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.0% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.5% | 23.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.7% | 95.4% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 3.6% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.8% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 33.9% | 13.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 49.3% | 79.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.3% | 22.2% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.8% | 10.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.39 | 1.61 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.01 | 1.44 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 48.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.0%CMS range 27.0–52.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.2–15.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 48.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 54.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 83.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 4.4–13.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.35 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 178 beds and averages 125.4 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 53 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable pressure ulcer for an at-risk dependent resident resulting in the resident developing a facility-acquired stage four (full thickness of the skin) pressure ulcer with infection to the buttocks one month after admission to the facility. (Resident B)The immediate jeopardy began on 5/26/26, when the nursing staff found a malodorous stage four pressure ulcer to the buttocks which tested positive for infection when cultured. The Administrator, RN Corporate Wound Specialist, RN Consultant, Corporate Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the immediate jeopardy on 6/10/26 at 3:06 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed and the deficient practice corrected on 6/9/26, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Finding includes: Resident B's closed record was reviewed on 6/10/26 at 9:54 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, stroke, and malignant cancer of the bladder.An admission Braden Scale assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were completed for dependent residents related to shaving, nail care, providing showers, and incontinence care for 6 of 11 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Residents H, E, G, D, F, B)Findings include: 1.During an interview on 2/16/26 at 3:24 p.m., Resident H indicated staff did not set him up to brush his teeth. He also indicated the razors were dull and shaving was very brutal, he would like an electric razor but no one had offered one. On 2/17/26 at 10:30 a.m., the resident was observed in his room and he had a large amount of facial hair. On 2/18/26 at 7:45 a.m. and 12:30 p.m, the resident's facial hair remained and oral care had not been provided. On 2/19/26 at 11:10 a.m., the resident had a large amount of facial hair and he indicated his teeth had not been brushed. At 11:17 a.m., CNA 3 searched the resident's drawers and she was unable to find a toothbrush or toothpaste. She indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a skin assessment was completed following an angiogram for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for change in condition and medications were administered as ordered for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents G, 24, 72, and 96)Findings include: 1. The record for Resident G was reviewed on 2/18/26 at 1:30 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure and peripheral vascular disease. The Modification of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/9/25, indicated the resident was not cognitively intact for daily decision making. A Nurse's Note, dated 12/1/25 at 6:32 p.m., indicated the resident arrived back to the facility from a physician's appointment. The resident was alert and in no distress. The resident was scheduled for a follow up appointment on 12/23/25 at 8:30 a.m. A note from the vein clinic, dated 12/1/25, indicated the resident had an angiogram (a minimally invasive procedure to visualize…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was clean and in good repair related to dirty and discolored floor tiles, marred walls and door frames, dusty ceiling vents, and dead insects in light fixtures for 2 of 3 units observed. (South and PCU) Findings include: During the environmental tour with the Environmental Supervisor on 2/24/26 at 1:37 p.m., the following was observed:1. South Unita. In the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER], the toilet paper holder was broken and detached from the wall. The bathroom door frame was scratched and marred. One resident resided in the room and used the bathroom. b. The wall behind the head of bed one in room [ROOM NUMBER] was scratched and marred. The floor tile around the base of the toilet was discolored with a white substance. Two residents resided in the room and used the bathroom. c. The floor tile located at the base of the toilet in room [ROOM NUMBER] was discolored with a white substance. Two residents resided in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity related to wearing a hospital gown during the day for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident 35)Finding includes: During random observations on 2/16/26 at 11:13 a.m., 2/18/26 at 10:27 a.m., 2/20/26 at 9:03 a.m., 10:56 a.m., and 2:39 p.m., and 2/24/26 at 10:12 a.m., Resident 35 was observed in his bed, wearing a hospital gown. During interviews on 2/16/26 at 11:13 a.m., 2/20/26 at 2:39 p.m., and 2/24/26 at 10:12 a.m., the resident indicated he did not want to wear a hospital gown, and he had his own clothes in his closet. The resident's record was reviewed on 2/18/26 at 10:48 a.m. The Medicare-5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/14/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making, and was dependent in activities of daily living (ADLs). The resident's record lacked documentation that the resident preferred to wear a hospital gown during the day.During an interview on 2/24/26 at 10:15 a.m., the Director of Nursing was informed of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure evidence was provided related to Level 1 and Level 2 PASARR (Pre admission Screening and Annual Resident Review) screening for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 2)Finding includes:The record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 2/19/26 at 10:30 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from another long term care facility. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/31/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident had the coded diagnoses of post traumatic stress disorder and depression. A Care Plan, dated 2/6/26, indicated the resident suffered from trauma informed care due to military trauma or exposure. Interventions included, but were not limited to, provide emotional support and psychiatry/psychology services. A Level 1 PASARR (Pre admission Screening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was in place for pain for a resident receiving opioid (narcotic pain medication) medication for 1 of 31 residents whose care plans were reviewed. (Resident 131)Finding includes:The record for Resident 131 was reviewed on 2/19/26 at 10:07 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, polyneuropathy.A Physician's Order, dated 11/9/25 and discontinued on 2/12/26, indicated hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 milligrams (mg) 1 tab twice a day. A Physician's Order, dated 2/13/26, indicated hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325mg 1 tab every 6 hours as needed for pain.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/15/26, indicated the resident had received scheduled pain medication and had received opioid medication in the past seven days.The Medication Administration Record, dated 2/2026, indicated the resident had received the opioid medication as ordered.There was a lack of any care plan for pain or opioid medication use.During an interview on 2/19/26 at 12:03 p.m., the Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan conference was held quarterly for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for care planning. (Resident 1)Finding includes:During an interview on 2/16/26 1t 11:20 a.m., Resident 1 indicated he was his own responsible party and had not been invited to or participated in any care plan conferences for a while.The record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 2/18/26 at 1:25 p.m. A Care Plan Meeting Progress Note, dated 9/30/25, indicated a care plan conference was held and the resident had attended. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/9/26, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired.There was lack of documentation the resident had been invited to any care plan meetings, or any care plan meetings had been held since 9/30/25.During an interview on 2/19/26 at 12:05 p.m., the Nurse Consultant indicated the last care plan conference was completed in September 2025. She was unable to find any further care plan meeting documentation.3.1-35(d)(2)(B)
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide activities to support the psychosocial well-being of cognitively impaired, dependent residents for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for activities. (Resident 8)Finding includes: During a random observation on 2/16/26 at 3:23 p.m., Resident 8 was lying in bed. She was blankly staring at the wall, and did not respond to verbal stimulation. The television was on. No staff was observed interacting with resident. On 2/18/26 at 10:20 a.m., two staff members entered the resident's room, repositioned her, and immediately left the room. At 1:26 p.m., the resident was observed lying in bed, staring blankly. The television was on. At 1:42 p.m., the Activities Director entered the resident's room, spoke to her for 1-2 minutes, and left the room. On 2/19/26 at 10:43 a.m. and 3:06 p.m., the resident was observed lying in bed, staring blankly toward the wall. The television and radio were off. No staff interaction was observed. On 2/20/26 at 9:05 a.m. and 11:02 a.m., the resident was observed lying awake in bed. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of pressure ulcers was completed upon admission for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents 2 and 133)Findings include: 1.The record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 2/19/26 at 10:30 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, history of traumatic brain injury, and severe protein calorie malnutrition. The resident was admitted to the facility from another long term care facility on 1/28/26. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/31/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident had two Stage 3 pressure ulcers (a full thickness skin loss exposing subcutaneous fat, but not muscle, tendon, or bone) that were present on admission. An admission Assessment, dated 1/28/26, indicated the resident had an ace wrap to the bilateral lower extremities. The resident refused a skin assessment. A discharge instruction sheet, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with adequate supervision to prevent falls and accident hazards were not present in resident rooms for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Residents B and C)Findings include: 1.The closed record for Resident B was reviewed on 2/17/26 at 2:35 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain) and chronic respiratory failure. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had a hospital admission on [DATE], returned to the facility briefly on 12/18/25, then was readmitted to the hospital on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/24/25, indicated the resident was not cognitively intact for daily decision making. She had no history of falls, was dependent on staff for toileting, and was dependent on staff for transfers from the bed to the chair. A Care Plan, dated 11/22/25, indicated the resident was at risk for falls due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure acceptable parameters of nutrition were maintained related to obtaining a re-weight in a timely manner following a hospitalization for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident H)Finding includes: The record for Resident H was reviewed on 2/19/26 at 2:20 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic kidney disease and anemia. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].A Care Plan, dated 2/2/26, indicated the resident had a nutritional problem related to receiving a therapeutic diet and dietary restrictions. Interventions included, but were not limited to, provide and serve diet as ordered. The 2/7/26 5-Day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was moderately impaired for decision-making. The resident held food in his mouth, weighed 219 pounds, had a significant weight loss, and received a therapeutic diet.On 1/30/26 the resident weighed 237 pounds.On 2/7/26 the resident weighed 219…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with a gastrostomy tube (g-tube, the surgical insertion of a feeding tube) received the appropriate treatment related to administration of the tube feeding for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for tube feedings. (Residents 50 and 133)Findings include:1. On 2/16/26 at 3:09 p.m., Resident 50 was observed lying in bed. The tube feeding, Jevity 1.5 (tube feeding formula), was connected and infusing at 75 milliliters per hour (ml/hr).The resident's record was reviewed on 2/18/26 at 10:33 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, gastrostomy, dysphagia, and adult failure to thrive.A Care Plan, updated 11/23/25, indicated the resident had a swallowing problem and required the tube feeding.The 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/19/25, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired and received the majority of their nutrition by tube feeding.A Physician's Order, dated 2/4/26, indicated the resident was to receive Jevity 1.5 at 75 milliliters per hour (ml/hr) continuously for 21 hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended on top of the medication cart during medication administration for 2 of 6 residents observed during medication pass. (Residents 7 and 46)Findings include:1. On 2/18/26 at 3:52 p.m., a punch card containing two pills was observed unattended on top of the medication cart on the PCU Unit. There was no name on the punch card. At 4:03 p.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing and LPN 3 were observed sitting behind the nursing station and the medication was still on top of the medication cart. During an interview on 2/18/26 at 4:24 p.m., LPN 3 indicated she thought the pills were empty, she then pulled them out of the garbage can where she threw them away and indicated there were 2 pills left and they were Aricept (medication to manage dementia). 2. On 2/18/26 at 3:55 p.m., LPN 4 was observed completing a glucometer blood sugar check for Resident 46. The LPN gathered her supplies and entered the resident's room at 3:59 p.m. to wash her hands. She left the resident's insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medical record was complete and accurately documented related to a resident death for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident J)Finding includes:Resident J's record was reviewed on 2/20/26 at 2:36 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease.A Death in Facility Minimum Data Set (MDS) entry was completed on 12/11/25.A Progress Note, dated 12/11/25 at 9:39 a.m., indicated the resident had left the facility to go to dialysis. No acute distress noted at this time. There were no further progress notes documented.During an interview on 2/24/26 at 10:25 a.m., the Director of Nursing indicated the resident had gone out to dialysis and coded while there. She had passed away that day and had not returned to the facility. The resident's death had not been documented in the progress notes, but her discharge would have been reflected in the midnight census.This citation relates to Intake 2712287.3.1-50(a)(1)
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place and implemented related to the storage of urinals and wash basins on 1 of 3 units. (The South Unit) The facility also failed to ensure a catheter port was cleansed prior to administering intravenous (IV) antibiotics for 1 of 1 resident observed for IV medication administration. (Resident 7)Findings include:1.On 2/16/26 at 2:30 p.m., two urinals were observed hanging from the grab bar in the bathroom. A yellow wash basin was observed on the floor underneath the bathroom sink. The urinals and wash basin were not contained. On 2/24/26 at 1:50 p.m., three urinals were observed hanging from the grab bar in the bathroom and the wash basin remained on the floor underneath the bathroom sink. Again, the urinals and wash basin were not contained. Two residents resided in the room and used the bathroom.During an interview on 2/24/26 at 3:45 p.m., the Director of Nursing indicated the urinals and wash basin should have been contained in plastic bags when not in use. 2. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B)Finding includes:An Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) report form, dated 12/19/25 at 9:01 a.m., indicated Resident C had reported to the Administrator that a male entered his room several times during the night and touched his roommate, Resident B, inappropriately. Resident C became very agitated, was evaluated by the Nurse Practitioner, who indicated he was having an acute exacerbation of his mental illness. Investigation included review of staffing and camera footage. The preventive measure taken was sending Resident C to the ER for psychiatric evaluation. The incident follow-up documented that Resident C was admitted to the hospital, and the care plan would be adjusted upon his return to the facility.The facility investigation notes, received as complete from the Administrator on 12/30/25 at 11:20 a.m., indicated the Director of Nursing performed a head-to-toe assessment on Resident B on 12/19/25, and no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were completed for dependent residents related to showers not being completed and documented for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Residents B and D)Findings include:1.Resident B's record was reviewed on 12/15/25 at 10:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, spinal cord disease, schizophrenia, gout, difficulty walking, depression, and bipolar disorder.The 8/8/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident had impairment on one side of the lower extremity and required substantial/maximum assistance for eating, oral hygiene, and personal hygiene. All other ADLs required dependent care. The resident required substantial/maximum assistance for all transfers.The Care Plan, revised on 9/3/25, indicated the resident had an ADL self-care/mobility performance deficit related to gout. An approach indicated the resident was dependent with shower/bathing self.The record lacked any shower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary care and services, related to 72 hour assessments and neurological assessments not completed for a resident with an unwitnessed fall and medication not given as ordered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Residents C and G)Findings include:1.Resident C's record was reviewed on 12/15/25 at 3:00 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart disease, copd, sepsis, depression, dementia, and anxiety.The 11/13/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was not cognitively intact for daily decision making. The Medication Administration Records (MAR), from October and November 2025 indicated the medications were blank and not signed out as being completed on the following days:aspirin: blank on 10/25, 10/29, 11/8, and 11/28/25zoloft: blank on 10/25, 10/28, 11/8, and 11/28/25norco: blank on 11/8, 11/14, and 11/28/25A Physician's Order, dated 12/13/24, indicated to administer Aspirin 81…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a pressure ulcer received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing, related to treatments not completed as ordered by the Physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident C) Finding includes: During an observation on 1/23/25 at 11:08 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) completed Resident C's pressure ulcer treatments with the assistance of Unit Manager 1. The DON indicated the pressure ulcer treatment on the coccyx was a duoderm (hydrocolloid dressing) and was to be changed every three days. She indicated the treatment had been completed on 1/22/25. The dressing on the coccyx at the time of the observation was a border gauze dressing with the date of 1/22/25 on the dressing. Resident C's record was reviewed on 1/23/25 at 11:02 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia. A Physician's Order, dated 12/15/24, indicated a duoderm dressing was to be applied to the coccyx every three days. The order was discontinued on 1/22/25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure correct Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was used by a staff member (Housekeeper 1) when cleaning a room where a COVID-19 positive resident resided (Resident F) and was in COVID-19 Transmission-Based Precautions, for one random observation for infection control. Finding includes: During an observation on 1/22/25 at 12:00 p.m., Resident F was lying in his bed in his room. There was a red sign on the door that indicated the resident's room was a Red Zone, which meant the resident was COVID-19 positive. The Red Zone sign indicated the resident should be asked to put a mask on when the staff were in the room and gloves, gown, face shield and a N95 mask were to be worn when in the room. Housekeeper 1 was observed in the room and mopping the floor. Housekeeper 1 had a surgical mask on and was not wearing a face shield. Housekeeper 1 was interviewed at the time and indicated she was unsure if she should have a N95 mask and face shield on. She indicated the resident was asleep so she had not asked him to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete adequate fall follow up related to missing neurological assessments for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident B) Finding includes: The record for Resident B was reviewed on 11/21/24 at 9:26 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, malignant neoplasm (abnormal growth) of the head, face, and neck, malignant neoplasm of the tongue, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and tracheostomy status. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/5/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident was receiving tracheostomy care. A Care Plan, reviewed on 10/3/24, indicated the resident was a fall risk related to cancer and medications. Interventions included, but were not limited to, follow facility fall protocols and evaluate and treat as ordered or as needed. Resident B had an unwitnessed fall on 10/20/24. The Neurological 24 Hour Assessment was initiated on 10/20/24 at 12:25 p.m. The assessments were recorded as completed on the following dates and times: - On 10/20/2024 at 12:25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was clean and in good repair related to dirty and discolored floor tiles, marred walls, dirty and missing baseboards, broken mini blinds, dirty and rusty toilet bolts, missing toilet bolt covers, and caulk missing around the toilet for 3 of 3 units observed. (North, South and PCU) Findings include: During the environmental tour with the Maintenance and Housekeeping Supervisors on 9/20/24 at 3:23 p.m., the following was observed: 1. North Unit a. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the floor in the room was discolored and had an accumulation of dirt and debris along the baseboard throughout the room. The left closet door was off the track. There was dirt and debris along the track of the closet door. The bathroom floor had dirt and debris along the base board. There was no trash can in the room. b. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the entry way trim had build-up of dirt and debris. Behind the entry doorway there was a build-up of dirt and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's privacy was maintained related to staff not knocking on the door prior to entering the resident's room for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for privacy. (Residents 2 and 9) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 9/16/24 at 2:44 p.m., Resident 2 indicated staff do not always knock on her door prior to entering her room. On 9/16/24 at 2:55 p.m., CNA 3 opened the door to the resident's room without knocking. The CNA proceeded to close the door and exit the resident's room. On 9/16/24 at 2:58 p.m., a staff member, partially opened the door and then closed it. The staff member did not knock on the door prior to opening it. The record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 9/19/24 at 9:56 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bipolar, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/15/24, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. During an interview on 9/18/24 at 4:10 p.m., the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were completed for dependent residents related to dirty and long fingernails and the removal of facial hair for 3 of 10 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Residents 35, 58, and 236) Findings include: 1. During random observations on 9/16/24 at 9:32 a.m., 11:44 a.m., and 2:38 p.m., on 9/17/24 at 9:00 a.m., 1:38 p.m., and on 9/18/24 at 9:09 a.m., 11:15 a.m., and 1:57 p.m., Resident 35 was observed with dirty fingernails on her left hand and long and dirty fingernails on her right hand. On 9/19/24 at 8:15 a.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) 2 was asked to observe the resident's fingernails. At that time, ADON 2 indicated her nails were long and dirty. The record for Resident 35 was reviewed on 9/17/24 at 2:05 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, aphasia (a language disorder that makes it difficult to understand or express language), diabetes, hemiplegia (paralysis on one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure non-pressure ulcer treatments were completed as ordered for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for skin conditions and failed to obtain a psychiatric consult as ordered for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents 94 and 107) Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 9/16/24 at 10:26 a.m., Resident 94 was observed sitting on a couch in the dining/day room. The resident's left lower leg was observed to be scaly, with scabbed and inflamed red areas. There were no bandages on her left lower leg. The record for Resident 94 was reviewed on 9/18/24 at 9:45 a.m. Diagnoses included, buy were not limited to, schizophrenia, morbid obesity, cellulitis, high blood pressure, major depressive disorder, anxiety, osteoarthritis, and bipolar disorder. The 6/15/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was not cognitively intact for daily decision making. A Care Plan, revised on 3/25/24, indicated the resident was resistive to care and refused wound care. A Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a palm protector was donned as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for range of motion. (Resident 35) Finding includes: During a random observation on 9/16/24 at 9:32 a.m., Resident 35 was observed sitting in a geri chair, dressed in street clothes and finishing breakfast. At that time, her right hand was clenched like a fist and there was no anti-contracture device in her hand. On 9/16/24 at 11:44 a.m., the resident now was observed with a palm protector in her right hand The record for Resident 35 was reviewed on 9/17/24 at 2:05 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, aphasia (a language disorder that makes it difficult to understand or express language), diabetes, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), heart disease, and high blood pressure. The 6/16/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident was not cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident had a functional limitation of range of motion impairment to one side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Foley (urinary) catheter bags and tubing were kept off of the floor for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 58) Finding includes: During a random observation on 9/16/24 at 9:30 a.m., Resident 58 was observed in bed. Her anchored catheter bag was on the floor at the side of the bed. During an interview at that time, CNA 1 indicated the catheter bag should not be on the floor. During random observations on 9/18/24 at 9:12 a.m. and 10:04 a.m., the resident was up and dressed and observed sitting in her wheelchair. At those times the catheter bag and tubing was observed on the floor under the wheelchair. On 9/18/24 at 10:29 a.m., the Director of Rehabilitation entered the resident's room and asked if she was ready for therapy. The resident indicated she was, so the director pushed her out of the room to the therapy room. At that time, the catheter bag and tubing remained on the floor while being pushed down the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. During an observation on 9/18/24 11:05 a.m. Resident 107 had asked to use the bathroom. At that time, he was wheeled out of the dining room by RN 1 and assisted back to his room. The Medical Record Supervisor (who was also a CNA) assisted RN 1 in placing the resident on the toilet. At that time, RN 1 was asked to lift up the resident's shirt so his peg tube (a tube that was inserted directly into the stomach for nutrition) could be observed. The peg tube was intact and there was dried crusty drainage around the stoma site. There was no bandage covering the stoma site. During an interview on 9/18/24 at 11:09 a.m., RN 1 indicated he has flushed the tube on his shift but he has never cleaned around it. After he had checked in the computer, he indicated there were no orders for the peg tube site to be cleaned. The record for Resident 107 was reviewed on 9/19/24 at 10:55 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, high blood pressure, psychotic disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia without behaviors, and type 2 diabetes. The resident transferred to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 9/16/24 at 11:18 a.m. and 12:22 p.m., Resident 55 was observed wearing oxygen via nasal cannula. The oxygen flow rate was on at 3 liters. The record for Resident 55 was reviewed on 9/17/24 at 3:11 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anoxic (no oxygen to the brain) brain damage, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hypertension (high blood pressure), vegetative state (severe brain damage), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/12/24, indicated the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making and the resident required oxygen therapy. A Care Plan, dated 2/8/24, indicated the resident required oxygen therapy. Interventions were to monitor signs of respiratory distress and to administer oxygen settings via nasal cannula per oxygen orders. A Physician's Order, dated 12/17/23, indicated to administer oxygen at 2 liters per nasal cannula continuously every shift. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for 2 of 6 residents observed during medication pass. Two errors were observed during 33 opportunities for errors during medication administration. This resulted in a medication error rate of 6.06%. (Residents 3 and 126) Findings include: 1. During an observation of medication pass on 9/18/24 at 4:00 p.m., LPN 1 prepared the insulin Fiasp flex touch pen for Resident 3. She opened the insulin pen, wiped the seal with an alcohol swab, attached the needle, dialed the pen to 10 units, and proceeded to administer the medication to the resident. The LPN did not prime the pen before administration of the insulin. During an interview on 9/20/24 at 9:25 a.m., the 200 Unit Manager indicated the insulin pen should have been primed prior to giving the insulin. The facility policy titled, Insulin Pen Procedure was reviewed on 9/20/24 at 1:54 p.m. The policy was provided by the nurse consultant and identified as current. The policy indicated the following, .7. Prime the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had seen the dentist at least yearly for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dental care. (Resident 88) Finding includes: On 9/16/24 at 10:43 a.m., Resident 88 was observed with missing upper and lower teeth. During an interview at that time, the resident indicated he had not seen the dentist since he arrived at the facility in 2022. The resident expressed he wanted dentures and indicated he had been on the dental list for a long time. The record for Resident 88 was reviewed on 9/18/24 at 8:45 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypotension (low blood pressure), anemia (low iron), adult failure to thrive, respiratory failure, heart failure, kidney disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/28/24, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. There was no dental care plan. A Physician's Order, dated 2/5/24, indicated the resident could receive dental care as needed. During an interview on 9/19/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were accurate and complete related to 15 minute checks for a resident who had pushed another resident down to the ground for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident 94) Finding includes: The record for Resident 94 was reviewed on 9/18/24 at 9:45 a.m. Diagnoses included, buy were not limited to, schizophrenia, morbid obesity, cellulitis, high blood pressure, major depressive disorder, anxiety, osteoarthritis, and bipolar disorder. The 6/15/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was not cognitively intact for daily decision making. A Care Plan, dated 7/31/24, indicated the resident had the potential to be physically aggressive. A Social Service Progress Note, dated 7/31/24, indicated the resident had an altercation with her roommate. Resident 94 indicated she was in the bathroom sitting on the toilet and her roommate entered the bathroom and told the her she was going to hit her, so Resident 94 got off the toilet and hit her first and left the room. The other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place related to hand hygiene during glove use for 1 of 1 glucometer blood sugar checks observed, staff failing to donn personal protective equipment (PPE) for a resident who was in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), and ensuring Foley (urinary) catheter bags were not on the floor during random infection control observations. (Residents 3, 36, and 113) Findings include: 1. On 9/18/24 at 4:00 p.m., LPN 1 was observed completing a glucometer (a test to check the resident's blood sugar) procedure for Resident 3. The LPN entered the resident's room, proceeded to donn a pair of gloves and completed the glucometer check. The LPN sanitized her hands after removing her gloves. She did not wash her hands or use hand sanitizer upon entering the resident's room or before donning the gloves. During an interview on 9/20/24 at 2:28 p.m., the Nurse Consultant indicated hands should be washed and/or sanitized upon room entry so it would be expected for staff to sanitize their hands…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) immediately or within the 2 hour time period for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) The facility also failed to ensure the allegation submitted was not misleading with the facts reported, related to the dates of the allegation, names of residents possibly involved, description of the area at the time of the allegation, and the description of the allegation. (Residents B & C) Finding includes: During a family interview on 2/8/24 at 8:20 a.m., they indicated they came to visit on 2/6/24, and they thought Resident B was being abused by his roommate. They had been told by another resident at the facility, the roommate was burning him with a cigarette or a lighter. They also indicated the resident had bruises on both arms. During an interview on 2/8/24 at 10:46 a.m., Employee 3 indicated on 2/6/24 at approximately 4 p.m., she was in another room and saw the family member talking to another resident, and overheard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was discharged in a safe manner and the facility completed guardianship papers timely for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. (Resident B) Finding includes: The record for Resident B was reviewed on 11/6/23 at 9:35 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and, per facility documentation, was discharged Against Medical Advice (AMA) from the facility on 10/29/23. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances, osteoarthritis, cognitive communication, and cerebrovascular disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/25/23, indicated the resident was not cognitively intact and needed supervision with most of her activities of daily living. The hospital History and Physical Notes, dated 8/16/23, indicated a social service consult would be needed for placement for suspected elder abuse. The resident had not seen a physician in 4 years and had minimal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions related to expired food in the reach in cooler, a dirty oven hood, grease build up on the stove, as well as touching food items with a gloved hand and the lack of hand hygiene after glove removal. This had the potential to affect the 125 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. (The Main Kitchen) Findings include: 1. Observation during the initial kitchen tour, on 8/21/23 at 9:15 a.m. with the Dietary Food Manager (DFM), indicated the following: a. There were 3 bowls of pudding, dated 8/16/23, in the reach in cooler. b. The flour scoop was stored directly in the flour. c. The oven hood had a heavy accumulation of dirt and grease noted in all the slats. d. There was a heavy accumulation of grease build up on the back splash of the stove. e. The transportation cart that housed the dome lids for the plates was rusted out in many places. Interview with the DFM at that time, indicated all of the above was in need of cleaning. The current 2020 Food Storage (Dry,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with ADL's (activities of daily living) related to nail care for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for ADL's. (Residents 63, 27, 35, and 68) Findings include: 1. On 8/21/23 at 1:55 p.m., Resident 63 was observed in his room in bed. His fingernails on both hands were long and in need of trimming. On 8/22/23 at 9:04 a.m. and 2:10 p.m., the resident's fingernails remained long. On 8/23/23 at 7:55 a.m. and 11:04 a.m., the resident's fingernails remained long. On 8/24/23 at 9:15 a.m., 10:07 a.m., 1:35 p.m., and 2:45 p.m., the resident's fingernails remained long and were in need of trimming. The record for Resident 63 was reviewed on 8/24/23 at 1:44 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke and hemiplegia (muscle weakness on one side of the body). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/23/23, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired for daily decision making and he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was clean and in good repair related to dirty and stained floor tiles, marred walls, stained privacy curtains, dirty baseboards, and improper storage of wash basins and bed pans for 3 of 3 units. (North, South and PCU) Findings include: During the environmental tour with the Maintenance and Housekeeping Supervisors on 8/25/23 at 1:12 p.m., the following was observed. 1. North Unit a. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the room walls and bathroom walls were marred. There were rust stains on the floor around the toilet and there was a yellow bedpan and pink wash basin on the floor under the sink in the bathroom. The bed pan was placed inside the wash basin. There were 2 residents in the room and shared the bathroom. b. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the tube feeding pole located next to bed 2 had dried tube feeding spillage on the base. There was also dried tube feeding on the ceiling above the tube feeding pump. The wall behind bed 2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's dignity was maintained related to wearing a hospital gown during the day for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident 63) Finding includes: On 8/21/23 at 1:55 p.m., Resident 63 was observed in his room in bed. The resident was awake and wearing a hospital gown. On 8/22/23 at 9:03 a.m. and 2:10 p.m., the resident was observed in his room in bed wearing a hospital gown. On 8/24/23 at 9:15 a.m., 10:07 a.m., 1:35 p.m., and 2:45 p.m., the resident was observed in his room in bed. He was wearing a hospital gown at those times. The record for Resident 63 was reviewed on 8/24/23 at 1:44 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke and hemiplegia (muscle weakness on one side of the body). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/23/23, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired for daily decision making and he required extensive assistance with dressing. The resident did not have a care plan or documentation related to any preference of wearing a gown during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately completed related to hospice care, anticoagulant use, and tracheostomy care for 3 of 30 MDS assessments reviewed. (Residents 24, 37, and 60) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 24 was reviewed on 8/22/23 at 1:50 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, atherosclerotic heart disease, congestive heart failure, and hypertension. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/6/23, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired and he had received an anticoagulant (blood thinner) for 7 days during the assessment reference period. A Physician's Order, dated 10/27/21 and listed as current on the August 2023 Physician's Order Summary (POS), indicated the resident was to receive Plavix (an antiplatelet) 75 milligrams (mg) daily. The resident had no orders for an anticoagulant during the assessment reference period. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 8/24/23 at 3:00 p.m., indicated the resident's MDS had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with diagnoses of mental illness received a new Level 1 PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 22) Finding includes: The record for Resident 22 was reviewed on 8/24/23 at 10:30 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bipolar disorder and schizoaffective disorder. The 8/14/23 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A Level 1 PASARR, completed on 10/20/2016 (prior to the resident's admission to the facility), indicated a PASARR Level 2 was not required. There was no other Level 1 PASARR completed after 10/20/16. Interview with the Social Service Director on 8/22/23 at 11:45 a.m., indicated she was not aware the resident had a mental illness diagnosis and she did not have a Level 2 completed. 3.1-16(d)(1)(A)
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a Care Plan related to hospice care and oxygen use for 1 of 30 Care Plans reviewed. (Resident 37) Finding includes: On 8/21/23 at 10:40 a.m., Resident 37 was observed in his room. He was wearing oxygen by the way of a nasal cannula. The record for Resident 37 was reviewed on 8/24/23 at 9:34 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia without behavioral disturbance and Alzheimer's disease. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/19/23, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making and he was not receiving hospice services while a resident of the facility. The resident was also identified as receiving oxygen. A Physician's Order, dated 7/6/23, indicated the resident was admitted to hospice. A Physician's Order, dated 7/7/23, indicated the resident was to receive oxygen at 2 liters per nasal cannula continuously. The resident's Care Plan was revised on 7/14/23. He had no Care Plan related to hospice care and oxygen use. Interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an ongoing activity program was implemented for alert and oriented, cognitively impaired, and dependent residents for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for activities. (Residents 63 and 10) Findings include: 1. On 8/21/23 at 1:55 p.m., Resident 63 was observed in his room in bed. The resident was awake and his television was turned off. On 8/22/23 at 9:04 a.m. and 2:10 p.m., the resident was observed in his room in bed. The resident was awake and his television was turned off. On 8/23/23 at 7:55 a.m., the resident was observed in his room in bed. The resident was awake and his television was turned off. On 8/24/23 at 9:15 a.m., 10:07 a.m., 1:35 p.m., and 2:45 p.m., the resident was observed in his room in bed. The resident was awake and his television was turned off. The record for Resident 63 was reviewed on 8/24/23 at 1:44 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke and hemiplegia (muscle weakness on one side of the body). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/23/23, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure areas of skin discoloration and scabbing were assessed and monitored for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions non-pressure related. (Residents 97 and 45) Findings include: 1. On 8/21/23 at 10:45 a.m., Resident 97 was observed with numerous areas of reddish purple discoloration to both of his arms and his right hand. He was wearing a short sleeve shirt at that time. No geri sleeves (a protective layer of fabric that is worn on the arms to prevent skin damage) were in use. On 8/22/23 at 9:04 a.m., the discoloration remained to his right arm and his right hand. The resident had a geri sleeve in place to his left arm but not his right. He was wearing a short sleeve shirt. Interview with the resident at that time, indicated he did not know how he got the areas but they wanted him to wear the sleeves on his arms. On 8/23/23 at 7:55 a.m., the resident was in his room in bed. No geri sleeves were in use and he was wearing a short…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall precautions were in place for a resident with a history of falls for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 52) Finding includes: On 8/21/23 at 10:35 a.m., Resident 52 was observed standing in her room reaching towards the over bed table. She was dressed in only a hospital gown and wearing plain gray socks. The socks did not have a non-skid surface. Her gown was falling off of her shoulder and she was unsteady on her feet. She was attempting to walk in the room and was redirected by the surveyor to sit back down on the bed. The resident's breakfast tray, which she had already finished, was on the over bed table. On 8/24/23 at 8:40 a.m., the resident was observed in bed with her eyes closed and dressed in a hospital gown. At 10:05 a.m., she was still in bed and her eyes were closed. The head of the bed was elevated, and her head was leaning to one side. The breakfast tray was placed in front of her on the over bed table. The record for Resident 52 was reviewed on 8/24/23 at 11:30 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to care for a PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter, intravenous catheter placed into the peripheral veins of the upper arm) in accordance with professional standards of practice, related to flushing the PICC line for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for intravenous care. (Resident 379) Finding includes: On 8/23/23 at 9:02 a.m., LPN 2 was observed passing medication to Resident 379. He prepared the cefepime (an antibiotic medication) 2 grams. He primed new intravenous (IV) tubing, cleaned the right upper arm PICC access lumen with an alcohol swab, flushed the PICC with 5 milliliters (ml) of normal saline, attached the IV tubing containing the cefepime, and started the IV infusion. At 9:44 a.m., LPN 2 was observed disconnecting the IV tubing after the medication had completed infusing. He flushed the PICC with 5 ml of normal saline, flushed the PICC with 5 ml of heparin (an anticoagulant), and applied a new cap to the lumen. Resident 379's record was reviewed on 8/23/23 at 9:56 a.m. Diagnoses included, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide proper respiratory care and services related to oxygen at the correct flow rate for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen. (Residents 37 and 35) Findings include: 1. On 8/21/23 at 10:40 a.m., Resident 37 was observed with oxygen by the way of a nasal cannula in use. The resident's oxygen concentrator was set at 3 1/2 liters. On 8/22/23 at 9:19 a.m. and 2:10 p.m., the resident was wearing his oxygen per nasal cannula and his oxygen concentrator was set at 3 1/2 liters. On 8/23/23 at 7:55 a.m., the resident was in his room in bed. His oxygen per nasal cannula was in use and the concentrator was set at 4 liters. At 11:05 a.m., the resident was in the main dining room. His oxygen was in use and his portable oxygen tank was set at 4 liters. On 8/24/23 at 9:16 a.m., the resident was in his room in bed sleeping. His oxygen was in use and his concentrator was set at 1 1/2 liters. At 10:27 a.m., the resident was in the main dining room. His…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor a fluid restriction for a resident receiving hemodialysis for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dialysis. (Resident 46) Finding includes: The record for Resident 46 was reviewed on 8/24/23 at 9:45 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. The 7/26/23 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact and received dialysis while a resident. A Care Plan, revised on 8/1/22, indicated the resident received hemodialysis three times a week. The approaches were to check the perma cath (dialysis access port in the upper chest) site every shift and record and encourage diet as ordered. Physician's Orders, dated 4/26/23, indicated hemodialysis three times a week on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Provide a renal, no added salt regular texture diet. Serve double proteins every meal and follow a 1.8 liter fluid restriction with 600 milliliters (ml) every shift. The Treatment and Medication Administration Records (TAR) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was an adequate indication for the use of a hypnotic medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 52) Finding includes: The record for Resident 52 was reviewed on 8/24/23 at 11:30 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited, major depressive disorder, hallucinations, bipolar disorder, dementia, and catatonic disorder. The 7/7/23 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was not cognitively intact. In the last 7 days, the resident had received an anti-anxiety medication 7 times. There was no Care Plan for a hypnotic medication. Physician's Orders, dated 7/26/23, indicated Temazepam (a hypnotic medication) oral capsule 15 milligrams (mg), give 1 capsule by mouth every day. An After Care Summary from the hospital, dated 7/26/23, indicated to continue the medication of Temazepam 15 mg daily. There was no indication for the use of the hypnotic medication. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 8/25/23 at 11:10 a.m., indicated she had just…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a controlled substance was double locked at all times for 1 of 2 medication rooms observed. (PCU) Finding includes: On 8/22/23 at 1:23 p.m., the PCU Medication Room was observed with LPN 1. Inside the unlocked refrigerator was a black tackle box. The box was not locked. Inside the box was a medication card of dronabinol (Marinol) pills. Interview with LPN 1 at that time, indicated the black box was normally locked. She wasn't sure why it was not locked currently. She would notify the Director of Nursing (DON). Interview with the DON on 8/22/23 at 1:46 p.m., indicated earlier in the day the QMA had notified her the lock on the black box had broken. They had requested a new lock from the pharmacy, and it was coming in tonight. She had asked the Maintenance staff to go to the store and get a lock until the new lock arrived from pharmacy, but they had not gotten to it yet. A facility policy, titled Medication Storage, indicated, .12. Controlled substances storage .12.2. After receiving controlled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the puree recipe for scrambled eggs, sausage, and waffles for the 1 resident who received a pureed diet from the kitchen. (Main Kitchen) Finding includes: On 8/23/23 at 7:41 a.m., [NAME] 1 was observed preparing the puree breakfast meal. The cook donned clean gloves to both hands and placed 2 scoops of scrambled eggs from the pan into the blender. She blended the mixture until smooth and stirred the contents. She added 1 piece of bread to the egg mixture and blended again. She removed the blender and stirred the eggs and put them in an aluminum pan. She washed the blender and utensils in the 3 compartment sink. She removed 17 sausage links from the steam table and put them into the blender and blended them. She added 1/2 cup of prepared chicken broth to the mixture and blended again. The cook removed the blender and stirred the contents and placed them into an aluminum pan. She washed the blender and the utensils in the 3 compartment sink. [NAME] 1 then removed 3 cooked waffles from the steam table and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented related to medication administration and a dialysis access site for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dialysis. (Residents 24 and 46) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 24 was reviewed on 8/22/23 at 1:50 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, atherosclerotic heart disease, congestive heart failure, and hypertension. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/6/23, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired and he had received an opioid medication during the assessment reference period. A Physician's Order, dated 5/5/23, indicated the resident was to receive Norco (a narcotic pain medication)10-325 milligrams (mg), 1 tablet three times a day for chronic pain. The August 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the resident's Norco was not signed out on the following dates and times: - 8:00 a.m. on 8/5/23 - 2:00 p.m. on 8/1, 8/5, and 8/11/23 - 10:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to APERION CARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BEATY, JEFF | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| CALDWELL, DANA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| COFFIN, JOHN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| HAEHL, PHILLIP | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| SANDMAN, JAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| STEVENS, MELANIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| TANDY, SHERRI | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| BLACK, STEPHEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| BURTON, KAREN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| CLAXTON, RYAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/26/2025 |
| GUSTAFSON, PAULA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| KUHN, HEATHER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| MERCURI, RALPH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2023 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2014 |
| ULBERT, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2014 |
| APERION CARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/13/2026 |
| ANEKWE, ADOLPHUS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2014 |
| BENSEMA, FRANK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2014 |
| DAWSON, CARLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2014 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2014 |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2014 |
| KODER, MICHELLE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/21/2026 |
| WIRTENBERG, DELECIA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/21/2026 |
| WROTSLOVSKTY, SHELDON | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/21/2026 |
| YOLINSKY, JACK | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/21/2026 |
| APERION CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2014 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2014 |
| ATTINGER, JEFFERY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2014 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 52 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $5.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 33% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155580. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.