Aperion Care Elgin
134 North McLean Boulevard, Elgin, IL 60121 · For profit - Individual · 101 certified beds · (847) 742-8822 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $56,661 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-28)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.6% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 6.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 94.9% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.0% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.7% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.0% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 38.3% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 41.8% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.2% | 26.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.1% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.35 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.27 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 74.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.3%CMS range 26.3–58.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.6–14.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 74.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 64.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 71.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 3.5–11.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.38 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 90.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.72 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.51 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.86 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with substance use disorder was safe for independent community access after being hit by a car the previous day while out in the community. This failure resulted in R2 being found on the side of the road by a bystander and requiring hospitalization. Hospital records show R2 had fractures of the left fourth through 12th ribs, and an elevated blood alcohol level. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for accidents in the sample of 6. The Immediate Jeopardy began on March 24, 2024 at 9:14 AM when R2 signed out of the facility without being assessed to be safe for independent community access after presenting to the nurse with alcohol on his breath, and after being hit by a car the previous day while out on community pass. V1 (Administrator) and V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on April 17, 2024 at 10:28 AM. The facility presented an abatement plan to remove the immediacy on April 17, 2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure emergency sized tracheostomy tubes for a resident (R1) who required tracheostomy care were available. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing acute respiratory distress and requiring an emergency hospitalization for acute respiratory failure. R1 had to be connected to mechanical ventilation for emergency respiratory support. The facility also failed to ensure licensed nurses were trained on how to change tracheostomy tubes and to dispose of expired tracheostomy inner cannulas. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for respiratory care. The findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage from an intracranial artery, ruptured aneurysm, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy, obstructive sleep apnea, and hypertension. R1's EMR showed he was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident attended infectious disease (ID) follow-up appointments, documenting and notify the attending the ID specialist of the missed appointment, resident refusal of care and the resident's discharge from the facility. This applies to 1 of 3 (R6) residents reviewed for care regarding active infections. The findings include:Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) showed that R6, a [AGE] year-old resident, was admitted to the facility from the hospital on September 5, 2025. R6's multiple diagnoses included non-traumatic spinal cord injury, acute paraplegia, surgical site infection, sepsis, lumbar radiculitis, diabetic amyotrophy, diabetes mellitus type 2, and multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis.Hospital records dated September 5, 2025, documented that R6 had undergone extensive lumbar spinal surgery on July 31, 2025. His postoperative course was complicated on August 8, 2025, by fever, severe sepsis, and a postoperative lumbar infection.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to prevent the verbal/mental abuse of a resident. This applies to 1 of 3 (R1) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 17. The findings include:On 9/15/25 at 12:30 PM, R1 stated V4 (CNA- Certified Nursing Assistant) and V5 (CNA) were harassing him at the facility. R1 alleged V4 called him Honey Bunn7 and came into his room uninvited in a threatening manner making threatening comments such as her father purchased her a gun and telling R1 he had not better be talking about V4. R1 stated one day V4 was standing in the hall and pointed to R1 and began a hoola dance. R1 stated he reported the harassment to V1 (Administrator) and V1 prohibited V4 and V5 from working near the unit on which R1 was residing. R1 stated on 9/13/25, R1 left his room to warm up food and saw V4 and V5 at the nursing stating in his hall. R1 stated he told his nurse that V4 and V5 were not to be near his hall and to call V1 to confirm they needed to leave. R1 stated he began recording the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow sanitary practices in the facility kitchen and during meal service in the dining room. This applies to all 84 residents that received foods prepared in the facility kitchen. The findings include: Facility's CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Form 671 dated April 21, 2025 showed that the facility census was 86 residents. Facility provided information that two residents are NPO (nothing by mouth) status. On April 21, 2025 at 09:19 AM, the initial tour of facility kitchen was done in presence of V3 (Dietary Manager). V5 (Dietary Aide) was washing dishes at a low temperature dish machine. On request, V5 ran a test strip through the dish machine and the tip turned from white to orange showing 200 ppm (parts per million) per instructions for chlorine test strip guidance on the dispenser bottle. When asked, V5 stated that he did not test the dish machine earlier with test strips and that the sanitizer range should be 100-200 ppm. Guidance for chlorine test strips posted on the wall showed the ppm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their Water Management Plan for Legionella. The facility also failed to follow their policies for handling soiled laundry, contact isolation, hand hygiene during provisions of care, and cleaning medical devices between residents. This applies to all 86 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The facility's Long-term Care Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated April 21, 2025, showed the facility's census was 86 residents. 1. On April 22, 2025, at 4:00 PM, V10 (Maintenance Director) said for the facility's Water Management Plan for Legionella, V10 does not do anything because there is no risk for Legionella in the facility. V10 said there is one eye wash station in the facility, in the kitchen, and V10 activates the eye wash station once a month. V10 demonstrated activating the eye wash station, V10 turned the eye wash station on, the water pushed the eye wash covers off, and V10 immediately turned off the eye…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance to residents requiring moderate assistance with grooming. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R75) reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) in the sample of 18. The findings include: R75's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis, weakness, and pseudobulbar affect (condition that causes inappropriate laughing or crying). R75's MDS (Minimum Data Set) date January 21, 2025, showed R75 had moderate impaired cognition and required moderate staff assistance for grooming. R75's care plan showed R75 had an ADL self-care/mobility performance deficit that may fluctuate with activity throughout the day related to fatigue, multiple sclerosis, and a need for assistance with personal care. On April 21, 2025, at 10:14 AM, R75 said she cannot remember when she had her last shower but thought is was at least a week ago. R75 said she needs to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to quarterly assess a resident's nutritional status. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R63) reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 18. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including polyosteoarthritis, legal blindness, vitamin D deficiency, chronic gastritis, and nicotine dependence. R63's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated April 8, 2025, showed R63 was cognitively intact. R63's nutrition care plan dated November 3, 2023, showed I have a nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem secondary to HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), cannabis dependence, legally blind, vitamin D deficiency, hypertension, history or COVID-19, and medications which may affect appetite and/or weight. The care plan continued to show a goal revised on October 21, 2024, I will maintain stable weight plus/minus 5% (percent) through next review. On April 21, 2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and care for a midline peripheral intravenous catheter. This applies to 1 of 1 residents (R48) reviewed for intravenous catheters in the sample of 18. The findings include: R48's electronic medical record showed R48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stable burst fracture of second lumbar vertebra, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, dependence on renal dialysis, gait abnormalities, and need for assistance with personal care. On April 21, 2025 at 10:10 AM, R48 stated that she is receiving intravenous antibiotics. R48 showed the surveyor, her right arm intravenous catheter which had a transparent dressing that was dated April 14, 2025. Underneath R48's transparent dressing, there was a gauze dressing which was stained with dried blood and was covering the insertion site. On April 21, 2025 at 1:24 PM with V2 (Director of Nursing/DON), observed R48 right upper arm intravenous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report a suspicion of a crime to law enforcement and the survey agency in a timely manner in accordance to the facility policy. This applies to 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for incidents in sample of 5. The findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged from the facility on March 29, 2025. R1 had multiple diagnosis including cachexia, severe protein -calorie malnutrition, dysphagia oropharyngeal phase, unsteadiness on feet, and cognitive communication disorder, adult failure to thrive, and cognitive communication deficit. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated March 5, 2025, showed R1 was severely cognitive impaired, and required assistance for ADLs including partial assistance with eating, substantial assistance with oral hygiene, bed mobility, and upper body dressing, and dependent on staff assistance for toileting, bathing, lower body dressing and transfer. On March 30, 2025, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to investigate an incident of a suspicion of a crime in accordance with their policy. This applies to 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for incidents in the sample of 5. The findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged from the facility on March 29, 2025. R1 had multiple diagnosis including cachexia, severe protein -calorie malnutrition, dysphagia oropharyngeal phase, unsteadiness on feet, and cognitive communication disorder, adult failure to thrive, and cognitive communication deficit. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated March 5, 2025, showed R1 was severely cognitive impaired, and required assistance for ADLs including partial assistance with eating, substantial assistance with oral hygiene, bed mobility, and upper body dressing, and dependent on staff assistance for toileting, bathing, lower body dressing and transfer. On March 30, 2025, at 10:13 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to hold care plan conferences with residents and their representatives and failed to invite residents and their representatives to participate in the care planning process. This applies to 6 of 6 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and R6) reviewed for administration in the sample of 6. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including convulsions, abnormal gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, diarrhea, chronic pain syndrome, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, mild vascular dementia with agitation, violent behavior, and low back pain. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated December 23, 2024 shows R1 has severe cognitive impairment, requires setup assistance with eating, partial/moderate assistance with showering, and supervision with all other ADLs (Activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to schedule neuropsychological testing for a resident as ordered by the neurology physician. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for improper nursing care in the sample of 6. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including convulsions, abnormal gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, diarrhea, chronic pain syndrome, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, mild vascular dementia with agitation, violent behavior, and low back pain. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated December 23, 2024 shows R1 has severe cognitive impairment, requires setup assistance with eating, partial/moderate assistance with showering, and supervision with all other ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). R1 is occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. On March 3, 2025 at 11:55 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to schedule an ophthalmology appointment for a resident as ordered by the neurologist. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for improper nursing care in the sample of 6. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including convulsions, abnormal gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, diarrhea, chronic pain syndrome, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, mild vascular dementia with agitation, violent behavior, and low back pain. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated December 23, 2024 shows R1 has severe cognitive impairment, requires setup assistance with eating, partial/moderate assistance with showering, and supervision with all other ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). R1 is occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. On March 3, 2025 at 11:55 AM, R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received an MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) as ordered by the neurologist. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for improper nursing care in the sample of 6. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including convulsions, abnormal gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, diarrhea, chronic pain syndrome, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, mild vascular dementia with agitation, violent behavior, and low back pain. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated December 23, 2024 shows R1 has severe cognitive impairment, requires setup assistance with eating, partial/moderate assistance with showering, and supervision with all other ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). R1 is occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. On March 3, 2025 at 11:55…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0778 — isolatedHelp the resident make transportation arrangements to and from radiology services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure transportation arrangements were made for a resident with a scheduled physician follow-up appointment. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for improper nursing care in the sample of 6. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including convulsions, abnormal gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, diarrhea, chronic pain syndrome, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, generalized anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, mild vascular dementia with agitation, violent behavior, and low back pain. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated December 23, 2024 shows R1 has severe cognitive impairment, requires setup assistance with eating, partial/moderate assistance with showering, and supervision with all other ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). R1 is occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. On March…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to discard expired food items from the dry storage. The facility also failed to follow its dishwashing machine operation guidelines by not checking the dishwashing machine before its first use to ensure sanitization. This applies to all 87 residents consuming food from the kitchen. The Findings Include: On 4/30/24 at 10:12 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen, the kitchen dry storage was observed with two one-gallon Worcestershire sauces used by the date of 12/13/2022. On 4/30/24 at 10:15 AM, V11 (Dietary Manager) stated that the expired sauce shouldn't be there and that he would discard it. The facility presented food storage guidelines and procedural Manual (2020) document: c. Discard food that has passed the expiration date, and discard food that has been prepared in the facility after seven days of storing it under proper refrigeration. On 5/1/24 at 9:48 AM, the kitchen was observed with V10 (Dietary Aide) running the dish machine after breakfast. As per the surveyor's request, V10 reran the machine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess residents for self-administration and storage of medication, as well as notifying and ordering medications for residents who were self-administering. The facility also failed to ensure residents took their medications during medication pass. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R12, R25, R34, R71) reviewed for administration and storage of medications in a sample of 26. The findings include: 1. On April 30, 2024 at 10:40 AM, R25 had a 245-milliliter bottle of generic day time severe cold and cough medicine which contained acetaminophen, dextromethorphan hydrobromide, and phenylephrine hydrochloride on the bedside table. R25's bottle of cough medicine appeared half empty. R25 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, abnormalities of gait and mobility, chronic respiratory failure, chronic pulmonary edema, hyperlipidemia, and muscle wasting. R25's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated April 18,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and care plan residents that smoke per facility policy. The facility also failed to ensure smoking materials were kept in the designated secure location. This applies to 5 of 9 residents (R46, R62, R71, R74, and R387) reviewed for safe smoking in the sample of 26. The Findings Include: 1. R46 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with moderately impaired cognition as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. R46 was observed on 4/30/24 at 10:45 AM in his room with an opened pack of cigarettes and matches on the bedside table. R46 stated, I have cigarettes and matches with me to go for smoking. I may go for a smoke after lunch. Record review on smoking safety risk assessment for R46 dated 1/15/24 document: All smoking materials will be kept locked in the facility designated area. A review of the care plan documents that R46 was care planned for smoking non-compliance with interventions, including smoking materials, will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to verify the counting logs accuracy for residents with controlled medications (R28, R47, and R52) and failed to dispose of controlled medications (R43) per facility policy. This applies to 4 out of 4 (R28, R47, R43, and R52) residents in a sample of 26. Findings include: 1. On 4/30/2024 at 2:45 PM, R28's Pregabalin 100 mg (milligrams) medication punch card was observed with #27 through #30 pill slots punched out with no medications. R28's Control Drug Administration Record sheet did not show any entries for medication removal. V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) was present during the observation and said he was not sure why the medications removed were not logged in R28's sign-off sheet. R28's Medication Review Report (MRR) dated 5/01/2024 did not show an order for Pregabalin. 2. On 4/30/2024 at 2:46 PM, R43's Hydrocodone-APAP 5-325 mg medication punch card was observed with the #3 through #6 pill slots punched open, with tape over them with a pill inside each slot. V4 (LPN) was present during the observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care to a resident dependent on toileting and failed to keep indwelling catheter drainage bag off the floor. This applies to 2 out of 2 residents (R46 and R48) observed for incontinence care and indwelling catheter care in a sample of 26. 1. On 4/30/2024 at 11:29 PM, R48 had a strong smell of urine. On 4/30/2024 at 11:32 AM, skin check with V13 (CNA-Certified Nurse Assistant) showed R48's incontinent brief was soaked with urine. R48's shirt and bed pad were soaked with urine. R48's coccyx was observed to be red. V13 provided incontinence care but did not apply barrier cream. On 5/2/2024 at 11:22 AM, V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) said she expects staff to check for incontinence care frequently at least every two hours. She said she expects staff to provide timely incontinence care to prevent skin breakdown and infection. R48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. MDS (Minimum Data Sheet) dated 3/27/2024 documents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow its oxygen and respiratory equipment changing/cleaning policy by not changing respiratory tubing and humidifier on weekly basis and not storing nasal cannula and nebulizer mask in a plastic bag with zip loc. This applies to 3 of 3 residents reviewed (R10, R40, R46) for respiratory care in a sample of 26. The Findings Include: 1. R46 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with moderately impaired cognition as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. On 4/30/24 at 10:45 AM, R46 was observed on his bed with his nasal cannula on the floor with no date/label. The humidifier was observed to be dirty and had no date/label. On 4/30/24 at 10:45 AM, R46 stated, They don't care about the tubing change. I filled the humidifier water chamber a couple of times. 04/30/24 at 10:51 AM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN), The night shift is supposed to change tubing, date, and label tubing, and fill the water reservoir. Oxygen tubing should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and document behaviors; and failed to develop and update plan of cares with interventions for residents (R1 and R61) with known behaviors related to mental disorders. This applies to 2 out of 2 residents (R1, R61) reviewed for behaviors in a sample of 26. Findings include: 1. R61's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) showed R61 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R61's EMR showed multiple diagnoses including psychosis, paranoid delusions, and dementia. R61's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/20/2024 showed R61 was cognitively intact. R61's MDS continued to show R61 did not show any behaviors of potential indicators of psychosis, including delusions. On 4/30/2024 at 10:34 AM, R61 was in his room and his privacy curtain was pulled. R61 had an untouched old meal tray with a ham sandwich, brussels sprouts, potatoes, a carton of milk, and a [NAME] Krispie treat on his bedside table. R61 said the facility staff was trying to poison him by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered. There were 25 opportunities with 3 errors resulting in a 12% error rate. This applies to 2 out of 2 (R29, R77) residents in a sample of 26. Findings include: 1. On 5/01/2024 at 8:10 AM during medication administration, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) said R77 had scheduled 11 units of Aspart (insulin). V5 turned R77's Aspart FlexPen dose knob to 11 units then administered it on R77's right arm and quickly removed the pen from the injection area. R77's Medication Review Report (MRR) dated 5/01/2024 showed an order for Insulin Aspart FlexPen Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Aspart) Inject 11 unit subcutaneously with meals for DM2. 2. On 5/01/2024 at 8:38 AM during medication administration, V5 said R29 had scheduled 12 units of Humalog (insulin). V5 turned R29's Humalog Kwikpen dose knob to 12 units then administered it to R29's right mid abdominal area and quickly removed the pen from the injection area. 3. Then V5 continued to say R29 had 2 units of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer the correct doses of insulin medications to residents (R29 and R77) and scheduled pain medication to a resident (R26). This applies to 3 out of 3 (R26, R29, R77) residents in a sample of 26. Findings include: 1. On 4/30/2024 at 2:46 PM during medication cart check, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) said he signed off R26's scheduled 9 AM Tramadol medication in the MAR (Medication Administration Record) but forgot to administer it that morning. R26's Tramadol 50 MG TAB medication punch card showed R26's 9 AM scheduled dose for 4/30/2024 was not removed. R26's Medication Review Report (MRR) dated 5/01/2024 showed an order for Tramadol HCI Oral Tablet 50 MG (Tramadol HCI) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Chronic pain. 2. On 5/01/2024 at 8:10 AM during medication administration, V5 (LPN) said R77 had scheduled 11 units of Aspart (insulin). V5 turned R77's Aspart FlexPen dose knob to 11 units then administered it on R77's right arm and quickly removed the pen from the injection area. R77's MRR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of expired medications. This applies to 2 of 2 (R34, R47) residents in a sample of 26. Findings include: 1. On 4/30/2024 at 3:12 PM, the medication storage task was done with V3 (Registered Nurse/RN) in the facility's [NAME] Hall medication room. The medication storage refrigerator had multiple medications stored including two bottles of R34's Vancomycin liquid solution with liquid solutions inside with expiration labels date of 4/01/2024. The Vancomycin bottle's labels said Use this bottle for dispensing after reconstitution. Contents MUST be used within 14 days, discard if hazy. R34's Medication Record Report (MRR) dated 5/01/2024 did not show an order for Vancomycin. 2. The medication storage refrigerator also had an opened hospice kit box with R47's medications. R47's box kit had one bottle of Lorazepam oral solution with liquid solution inside and an expiration label date of 3/02/2024, two needless syringes of Scopolamine gel with solution inside and they had an expiration label date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R8 and R9) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 11 The findings include: 1. On 11/02/2023 at 11:23 AM, R8 was wheeling his wheelchair and showed where R7 hit him to his right arm. R8 did not provide details and said he was fine now. R8 said he entered R7's room, and he did not like it. On 11/02/2023 at 11:28 AM, R7 was sitting in his wheelchair and said he had a sign on by his door not to enter his room and R8 did anyway. R7 said he was wrong, apologized to R8, and it's all good now. On 11/03/2023 at 3:37 PM, V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant) said that on 10/21/23, she heard a call light in R8's room, and when she checked, he was not there, and at the same time, yelling was coming from R7's room. V12 said R7 was swinging his cane towards R8 who was by the door, and R8 had a skin tear in his right chin and discoloration in his arm. R8 said R7 was talking bad…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve palatable meals to the facility residents. This applies to all 91 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: Facility Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 6/5/23, shows the facility census was 91 residents. On 6/6/23, V4 (Food Service Director) stated all residents in the facility were receiving oral diets and there were no residents with physician orders for NPO (Nothing by Mouth). On 6/05/23 at 12:21 PM during lunch service, a test tray of a regular diet was performed. The food was being served from the steam table in the main dining room onto room-temperature plates and the plated food was being covered with an insulated cover and placed on a tray rack for service to resident rooms. The room trays were delivered to the resident hallway and at 12:33 PM, the facility staff finished serving the room trays to the facility residents in the hallway. The food temperatures of the test tray were tested, and the pork entree measured 101.6 degrees F (Fahrenheit), the vegetables…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner. This applies to all 91 residents residing at the facility receiving oral diets. The findings include: 1. On 6/05/23 at 10:00 AM during initial tour of the kitchen the following concerns regarding sanitation were identified: There were dried food streaks down left side of fry top and down left side of stove top. V26 (Cook) was standing at the cook prep table utilizing the chemical sanitizing solution wiping cloth from the sanitizing bucket located at the cook station to wipe/sanitize the prep table in front of stove. V26 measured the chemical sanitation solution in the bucket at cook station measured 100 ppm (parts per million). V26 walked to the three-compartment sink and replaced the chemical sanitizing solution in the sanitizing bucket. V26 measured the concentration of the sanitizing solution which measured 100 ppm. Facility sanitizing chemical manufacturer information, dated 2018, shows the quaternary sanitizer test paper reading was expected to read…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their water management program for prevention of legionella growth. The facility also failed to follow their policy for hand hygiene during R69 and R88's wound care. This applies to all 91 residents residing in the facility. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report dated June 5, 2023, shows the facility census as 91 residents. The findings include: 1. On June 5, 2023, at 4:05 PM, V1 (Administrator) said V15 (Maintenance Director) is in charge of the water management prevention program. On June 5, 2023, at 4:08 PM, V15 said, I do not do anything for the water management program for legionella. I do not believe we can have legionella here because it comes from water towers. On June 6, 2023, at 4:23 PM, V15 said, I check the hot water temperatures once a week. I do not keep a log of the water temperatures. The facility has an eye washing station in the kitchen, and monthly I turn them on to make sure the covers come off.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nail, facial care and transfer for toilet needs to residents needing assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). This applies to 4 of 8 (R16, R25, R19 and R76) residents reviewed for ADL in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1. On 06/05/23 at 10:00 A.M., R16 was in her room. R16 was sitting in her reclining wheelchair. R16 was observed with long, jagged fingernails. There was black substance under R16's fingernails. During this observation, V11 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) came in to R16's room and proceeded to take R16 to the dining room. On 06/06/23 at 11:42 A.M., R16 was in the main dining room. R16 was still observed with long, jagged edges fingernails and black substance under her nails. On 06/07/23 at 10:58 A.M., R16 was in the hallway being propelled by her brother-in-law. R16 was observed with same long fingernails. V18 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) was present during this observation. V18 said that R16 is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for wound treatment and failed to provide pressure redistribution wheelchair cushion for a facility acquired pressure ulcer per physician orders. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R14) reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention and treatment in the sample of 20. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows that R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R14's diagnoses include heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, bipolar II disorder, fibromyalgia. The EMR also shows that on June 23, 2022, R14 acquired an unstageable pressure ulcer on the left posterior thigh at the facility. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated March 13, 2023, shows that R14 was cognitively intact, needed limited assistance for transfer from bed to wheelchair, and used a wheelchair for mobility. The MDS shows R14 independently propelled her wheelchair. Initial wound note, dated June 23, 2022, shows V22 (Wound Care Physician)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions for R54 when providing personal care. This applies to 1 (R54) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision in the sample of 20. The Physician Order Sheet (POS), printed 6/7/23, shows R54's diagnoses included dysthymic disorder, dysarthria, anarthria, psychosis, depressive disorder, adjustment disorder, anxiety disorder, agoraphobia, osteoarthritis, and history of falling. Resident Fall Care Plan, initiated on 12/2021 and revised 2/28/23, shows R54 fell on [DATE] and interventions implemented at the time of his 12/16/22 fall included providing two staff to assist him with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). The care plan shows R54 also fell on 2/23/23. Nursing progress note, dated 2/23/23, show R54 fell from bed when R54 began flailing arms and his CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) stepped away from resident to avoid being hit. The progress note does not indicate two staff were assisting R54 at the time of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide physician-ordered weight loss prevention interventions for a resident who experienced significant weight losses. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R54) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 20. The findings include: POS (Physician Order Sheet), printed 6/7/23, shows R54's diagnoses included dysthymic disorder, dysarthria, anarthria, psychosis, depressive disorder, adjustment disorder, anxiety disorder, agoraphobia, osteoarthritis, and history of falling. The POS shows R54 had physician orders for pureed diet, whole milk with all meals, fortified mashed potatoes and ice cream with all meals, super cereal daily with breakfast, and house nutrition supplement four times a day for supplement. Nutrition care plan, revised 6/5/23, shows R54 experienced a 9.8% weight loss from March 2023 to May 2023. Nutrition interventions included monitoring oral nutrition intake, documenting intake every meal, and providing nutrition supplements as ordered. Review of resident diet tickets show R54 was to receive ice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-06-08 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — widespreadHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a private area for the Resident Council to meet without staff proximity to the meeting. This applies to all the residents in the facility. Findings include : On 6/6/23 at 1:30pm, members of the resident council met in the rear dining room. The rear dining room has an open arch entrance that is next to the Nurses Station for the C and D Halls and the rear dining room is exposed to the staff and activities in and around the Nurses Station. On 6/6/23 at 1:30pm, R29 (President of Resident Council) stated they have had no room to meet in since the facility was remodeled. R29, speaking for the Resident Council, stated the main dining is open to staff and resident traffic and cannot be closed, and there is no other room large enough for the resident council to meet. The Main dining room, indeed, is open on two sides and cannot be closed.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$56,661 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $29,280 — penalty dated 2026-05-28
- $12,948 — penalty dated 2025-02-15
- $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-04-22
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to APERION CARE — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 1.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.3 | +1.7 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELISHEVA MEYSTEL IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 22% | since 01/01/2021 |
| FREDERICK S FRANKEL TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| KODER, MICHELLE | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/14/2023 |
| BEHR, JOSHUA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| JUDE, JODIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| MARTIN, LORNA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| ULBERT, LISA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| APERION CARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/18/2025 |
| SHROFF, PRANAV KUMAR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| BERKOWITZ, DAVID | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/18/2025 |
| FRANKEL, FREDERICK | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/16/2025 |
| MEYSTEL, YOSEF | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/18/2025 |
| 134 N. MCLEAN BLVD., LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/18/2025 |
| APERION CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2015 |
| DAVID A BERKOWITZ DELTA TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| DAVID A BERKOWITZ REVOC TR DAVID BERKOWITZ TTEE | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| YOSEF MEYSTEL DECLARATION OF TR OF YOSEF MEYSTEL TTEE | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| YOSEF MEYSTEL DELTA TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145740. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.