No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Edgewater Woods

1809 N Madison Ave, Anderson, IN 46011 · Government - County · 81 certified beds · (765) 644-0903 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (765) 644-0903 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Aug 2025
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Aug 2025
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1515 N Madison Ave · (765) 298-2778 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2940 Broadway St · (765) 649-9289 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3 Jackson St · (765) 393-0205 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1112 Broadway St · (765) 648-6858 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.4%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.9%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms14.8%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.4%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication36.7%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.1%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.8%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.2%79.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission12.0%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.1%10.8%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.0%CMS range 48.7–70.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 6.5–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 4.9–14.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.26
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
36.9%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 73.6 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-20)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain surgical wound care instructions for a newly placed suprapubic catheter (a urinary drainage device inserted directly into the bladder) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care. (Resident C)Findings include:Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 6/15/26 at 10:56 a.m. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection (antibiotic resistant infection), and obstructive and reflux uropathy candidiasis.A progress note, dated 5/21/2026 at 11:28 p.m., indicated a dressing to the suprapubic catheter was intact with minimal yellow drainage.A progress note, dated 5/23/2026 at 12:10 a.m., indicated a dressing to the suprapubic catheter was intact with minimal yellow drainage.A progress note dated 5/23/2026 at 11:28 a.m., indicated a suprapubic catheter dressing had a slight amount of drainage.A progress note, dated 5/26/2026 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents and/or their representatives with written notice of transfer/discharge and bed hold policy for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Resident 78)Resident 78's record was reviewed on 4/15/126 at 3:51 p.m. Diagnoses included liver cancer, altered mental status, and malnutrition.A 1/29/26 at 12:22 p.m. nurse's note indicated the resident was visited by a Nurse Practitioner (NP) and found to be lethargic and difficult to rouse. The NP ordered the resident sent to the emergency room (ER).A 1/29/26 6:30 p.m. nurse's note indicated the resident was admitted to the hospital.A 1/29/26 notice of transfer/discharge document, provided by the DON on 4/20/26 at 11:18 a.m., lacked an attached bed hold policy. The clinical record lacked documentation that the resident and/or their representative was provided with a written copy of the transfer/discharge form and/or bed hold policy.During an interview, on 4/20/26 at 11:34 a.m., RN 7 indicated when a resident was sent to the ER, a packet of paperwork including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a required Preadmission Screening and Record Review (PASRR) Level I screening assessment to determine if a Level II assessment was required when the resident received a new major mental illness diagnosis for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASRR. (Resident 11)Finding includes:Resident 11's clinical record was reviewed on 4/17/26 at 3:43 p.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. This diagnosis was added in July 2024. A 6/6/24, preadmission Level I PASARR Outcome document indicated a Level II assessment was not required. Rationale: There is no evidence of a PASARR condition of an intellectual/developmental disability or a serious behavioral condition. If changes occur or new information refutes these findings, a new screen must be submitted.A current care plan, initiated 7/11/24, indicated the resident had behavioral symptoms of delusions, tangential thoughts, agitation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure communications with a dialysis provider were reviewed to prevent duplicate pneumococcal vaccinations and to ensure continuity of care for 1 or 1 residents reviewed for dialysis. (Resident 2) Findings include:Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed on 4/16/26 at 3:12 p.m. Diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease, chronic kidney disease with heart failure, and acute kidney failure. Current orders included dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday (1/6/26).A review of the resident's March 2026, Dialysis Communication facility binder indicated Resident 2 received the Pneumococcal 20-valent conjugate vaccine (Prevnar 20) in her left deltoid while at dialysis on 3/2/26.Review of the resident's clinical record vaccination history indicated a Prevnar 20 vaccination was provided, at the facility, on 3/26/26, in the resident's left deltoid.The clinical record lacked historical data of any previous immunizations.A 3/26/26, quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was moderately cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were completed in a timely manner and per facility policy for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1.Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed on 4/16/26 at 1:01 p.m. Diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type 2 diabetes mellitus, and morbid obesity due to excess calories. Discontinued orders (on 3/11/26) included ipratropium-albuterol (to treat airflow) solution 0.5 milligrams (mg)-3 mg/3 milliliters (mL); use one vial by inhalation, every 6 hours as needed for shortness of breath; ondansetron (to treat nausea) disintegrating tablet 8 mg, give one tablet every 8 hours as needed for nausea and vomiting; polyethylene glycol 3350 powder (laxative) give 17 grams (gm) oral, mixed with 8 ounces (oz) of fluid, once daily as needed for constipation. A 1/7/26, pharmacy review indicated to see the report for irregularities. A 1/7/26, pharmacy recommendation indicated to consider discontinuation of the as needed orders of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccinations were provided following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and facility policy to prevent duplication of administration for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident 2) Findings include:Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed on 4/16/26 at 3:12 p.m. Diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease, chronic kidney disease with heart failure, and acute kidney failure. A review of the resident's March 2026, Dialysis Communication facility binder indicated Resident 2 received the Pneumococcal 20-valent conjugate vaccine (Prevnar 20) in her left deltoid while at dialysis on 3/2/26.Review of the resident's clinical record vaccination history indicated a Prevnar 20 vaccination was provided, at the facility, on 3/26/26, in the resident's left deltoid.The clinical record lacked historical data of any previous immunizations.A 3/26/26, quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired.During an interview, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from misappropriation when residents' Institutional Special Needs Plan (ISNP) benefits were utilized by a staff member for purposes other than the individual resident's benefit for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property (Resident D, Resident E, and Resident F). This deficient practice was corrected on 7/18/25, prior to the start of survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include: 1. Resident E's clinical record was reviewed on 8/28/25 at 11:21 a.m. Diagnoses included aphasia following cerebral infarction, cognitive communication deficit, and expressive language disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/4/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A progress note, dated 6/23/25 at 1:28 p.m., indicated the resident's representative was notified of a discrepancy with the resident's ISNP card and funds. The facility verified transactions and adjusted as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's catheter was anchored according to the physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for catheters. (Resident C) Findings include: Resident C's closed clinical record was reviewed on 8/27/25 at 3:36 p.m. Diagnoses included infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, subsequent encounter, other obstructive and reflux uropathy, urinary tract infection, and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms. Physician orders included cefpodoxime (antibiotic) 200 milligrams (mg) every 12 hours for urinary tract infection (7/25/25 - 7/27/25), levofloxacin (antibiotic) 500 mg daily (7/30/25 - 8/5/25), trospium (for overactive bladder) 20 mg twice a day (7/24/25), Foley catheter: 16 French 5-10 milliliter (mL) bulb (7/25/24 - 7/30/25), Foley catheter: 18 French 10 mL bulb (7/30/25), If resident does not void in six hours anchor foley catheter (7/29/25 - 7/30/25), and May use 18 French catheter to re-anchor until a 16 French 10 mL is available (7/29/25). An admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide physician ordered pain medication in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for admission. (Resident C) Finding includes:Resident C's closed clinical record was reviewed on 8/27/25 at 3:26 p.m. Diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis, polyneuropathy, post-laminectomy syndrome (syndrome after spinal surgery characterized by persistent or worsening pain, numbness, tingling, and weakness in the legs or back), and chronic pain due to trauma. Physician orders included fentanyl (opiate pain medication) patch 75 mcg (micrograms)/hour every other day (7/25/25), hydromorphone (opiate pain medication) 4 milligrams (mg) every four hours as needed (PRN) for moderate pain (7/24/25), ibuprofen (anti-inflammatory medication) 600 mg three times a day (7/25/25), acetaminophen (Tylenol) 650 mg every four hours PRN (as needed) for mild pain (7/24/25), and acetaminophen every four hours (7/24/25). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident representatives of cognitively impaired residents were invited to participate in care plan processes for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for notifications. (Resident B and Resident D) Findings include: 1. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 6/9/25 at 9:20 a.m Diagnoses included dementia, depressive episodes, gastric ulcer, migraine, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, scoliosis, dysphagia, and hypothyroidism. A quarterly MDS (Minimal Data Set) assessment, dated 3/26/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A care plan summary dated 1/10/25, indicated Resident B was in attendance for the meeting. No resident representative was listed in attendance. No resident representative was listed as being invited to the summary. A Care Plan Summary dated 3/26/25, indicated Resident B was in attendance for the meeting. No resident representative was listed in attendance. No resident representative was listed as being invited to the summary. Progress notes, dated December 2024 through April 2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide transportation to a medical procedure appointment as previously arranged for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transportation concerns, resulting in the resident missing the appointment. (Resident C) Findings include: Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 3/19/25 at 12:09 p.m Diagnoses included emphysema, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, angina pectoris, diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease with arterial ulcers to bilateral lower extremities, hypertension, and alcohol abuse. The most recent quarterly MDS (Minimal Data Set) assessment, dated 11/27/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required substantial to maximum assistance for toilet hygiene, lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, chair to bed/chair transfers, toilet transfers, and shower transfers. Method of mobility was a wheelchair. A care plan, dated 11/8/24, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to utilize infection prevention and control practices related to hand hygiene during laundry delivery. This deficiency had the potential to affect 69 of 70 residents who received facility laundry services. B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize infection prevention and control practices related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) during care for residents at higher risk for infection with an indwelling urinary catheter or a feeding tube, for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for infection control. (Residents 8, 10, and 9) Findings include: A1. During a continuous observation on 2/10/25 from 10:24 a.m. to 10:29 a.m., Laundry Attendant 9 pushed the laundry rack onto the Golden Orchard Unit with the curtains in place over the clothing rack. Without performing hand hygiene and using both hands, she opened the curtain on the clothing rack and removed clothing on hangers from the clothing rack. The curtain was placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure urinary output was monitored as ordered and abnormalities reported to the provider for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 8) Finding includes: On 2/10/25 at 11:35 a.m., Resident 8 was asleep in her bed with her catheter hung on the left side of her bed. Urine in the catheter drainage tube was observed to be milky-white. During an interview on 2/11/25 at 11:22 a.m., Resident 8 indicated she was unaware of any current treatment for infections. The urine in the urinary catheter tubing was cloudy and yellow. Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed on 2/11/25 at 2:40 p.m. Diagnoses included dementia of unspecified severity, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, pyuria, stage 4 chronic kidney disease, and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/9/25, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. She was dependent on staff assistance for toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, turning and transfers. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure staff handled medications in a sanitary manner and performed hand hygiene during a medication administration observation on the [NAME] Lane Unit. Findings include: During a medication administration observation on the [NAME] Lane unit, on 3/21/24 at 8:48 a.m., RN 2 was preparing medications for a resident. She punched six capsules from the medication card into her bare hand. She opened each capsule with bare hands and emptied the contents into a medication cup. She proceeded to administer the medication to the resident with other crushed medications. RN 2 did not sanitize her hands following administration. At 8:59 a.m., RN 2 prepared an as needed pain pill for a resident and administered the medication. She failed to sanitize her hands. At 9:01 a.m., RN 2 prepared medications for a resident and administered the medications. Upon returning to the medication cart, LPN 3 spoke with RN 2 regarding sanitizing her hands. RN 2 performed hand hygiene using an alcohol based hand rub. During the observation, RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 89 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Valparaiso Care & RehabilitationValparaiso, IN 2 of 5Arbor Grove VillageGreensburg, IN 2 of 5Bethany VillageIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Columbia Healthcare CenterEvansville, IN 2 of 5Community Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Eagle Valley MeadowsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Harcourt Terrace Nursing And RehabilitationIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Harrison TerraceIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Hickory Creek At New CastleNew Castle, IN 2 of 5Maple Park VillageWestfield, IN 2 of 5Park Terrace VillageEvansville, IN 2 of 5Riverside VillageElkhart, IN 2 of 5Trailpoint VillageSouth Bend, IN 2 of 5University Nursing CenterUpland, IN 2 of 5Williamsport Nursing And RehabilitationWilliamsport, IN 3 of 5Allisonville MeadowsFishers, IN 3 of 5American VillageIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Brownsburg MeadowsBrownsburg, IN 3 of 5Countryside MeadowsAvon, IN 3 of 5East Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterElkhart, IN 3 of 5Hickory Creek At CrawfordsvilleCrawfordsville, IN 3 of 5Hillcrest VillageJeffersonville, IN 3 of 5North Capitol Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Rosebud VillageRichmond, IN 3 of 5Rosewalk VillageIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Rosewalk Village At LafayetteLafayette, IN 3 of 5Spring Mill MeadowsIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Stonebrooke Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation CentreWabash, IN 4 of 5Beech Grove MeadowsBeech Grove, IN 4 of 5Clark Rehabilitation And Skilled Nursing CenterClarksville, IN 4 of 5Clinton GardensClinton, IN 4 of 5Creekside VillageMishawaka, IN 4 of 5Forest Creek VillageIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Franklin MeadowsFranklin, IN 4 of 5Heritage House Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterConnersville, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At ColumbusColumbus, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At MadisonMadison, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At PeruPeru, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At RochesterRochester, IN

Showing 40 of 89; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HORN, BRENDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/01/2023
BABCOCK, PAULIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/30/2020
AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2026
DICE, MARKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
HEAD, STEPHANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/29/2026
MACKEY, LINNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/12/2026
SANTOS OLIVERA, RAMONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/29/2026
VAN CAMP, STEVENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$876K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 4%Other / private 20%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $876K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$322per resident / day
operating cost
$9,776per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$331per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155066. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next