Maple Park Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 17.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 86.2 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-03-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by a CNA for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident D and F) This deficient practice resulted in Resident D thinking a staff member was going to kill him and signs he was scared after the abuse. Resident F had a history of abuse as a child and had two loose teeth in her mouth. The deficient practice was corrected on 2/20/26, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance.Findings include:1. During an interview, on 3/3/26 at 2:21 p.m., the Executive Director, Director of Nursing and Regional Director of Operations were in attendance and indicated Resident D was blind, had became combative while he was being changed, and CNA 5 put his hands on the resident.The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 3/5/26 at 2:29 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with mood disturbance, major depressive disorder, legal blindness, and pain.A care plan, dated 1/15/25, indicated Resident D was legally…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident from injury when the resident was left unattended in a bed which was not in the lowest position, and without a fall mat on the floor. The resident fell out of bed, sustained a laceration to the left side of the forehead and an acute left femoral neck fracture (a type of hip fracture of the thigh bone, just below the ball of the ball-and-socket hip joint). (Resident B) The facility also failed to ensure staff providing care were using/following the care sheet or electronic record which provides information on safety precautions put in place, resulting in Resident C had to be lowered to the floor, for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B and C) The deficient practice was corrected on 9/12/23, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include: 1. During a phone interview, on 9/19/23 at 10:04 a.m., the Power of Attorney (POA) for Resident B indicated Resident B was dressed and prepped for a full body mechanical lift, which should have had two people to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication was held according to the ordered parameters and the physician was notified of blood glucose readings as ordered for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 7 and 6)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 7 was reviewed on 9/12/25 at 8:26 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic diastolic heart failure, hypertensive heart, and chronic kidney disease with heart failure.A physician's order, dated 4/15/25 and discontinued 8/18/25, indicated to administer Entresto (a medication used to treat chronic heart failure) 49-51milligrams (mg) twice a day, with special instructions to hold the medication for a systolic blood pressure of less than 120.The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 7/1/25 to 7/31/25, indicated Entresto had been administered 13 times when Resident 7's systolic blood pressure was less than 120.The MAR, dated 8/1/25 to 8/18/25, indicated Entresto had been administered 5 times when Resident 7's systolic blood pressure was less than…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered medications included an appropriate supporting diagnosis and a medication included a stop date for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 11, 5 and 13)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 11 was reviewed on 9/12/25 at 10:36 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, muscle weakness, and encounter for other specified aftercare. A review of Resident 11's obsolete diagnoses indicated a diagnosis of herpes viral infection was placed on 5/20/24 and resolved on 7/23/24. A physician's visit note, dated 7/7/25, indicated Resident 11 had been experiencing painful blisters on her bilateral thighs and vaginal area, which was a chronic issue, and had been treated in the past. The treatment plan was to initiate a topical antiviral cream for 5 days, followed by valacyclovir (an antiviral medication used to treat infections) 500 milligrams (mg) every day. The physician's note did not include instructions regarding when the medication would be stopped…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) properly, wore the appropriate PPE when entering an isolation room, preformed hand hygiene, and changed gloves during a dressing change for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident 57, 34 and 5)Findings include:1. During a random observation, on 9/10/25 at 9:53 a.m., CNA 4 was observed to put on a protective gown, mask, and gloves outside of Resident 57's room. The gown was not tied at the neck. She then entered the room which had a sign posted to indicate it was a droplet/contact isolation room. The sign indicated to put on a gown and to tie the gown.During an interview, on 9/10/25 at 10:11 a.m., CNA 4 indicated the sign did indicate she should have tied her gown.During a random observation, on 9/11/25 at 8:48 a.m., CNA 3 was observed to put on a gown, mask, and gloves and enter Resident 57's room. She was not observed to put on the eye protection required for droplet precautions.During an interview, on 9/11/25 at 8:52 a.m., CNA 3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with continuous feeding through a Jejunostomy tube (J-tube) received the ordered amount of nutrient formula at the correct rate in the ordered time frame for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for enteral feedings. (Resident B) The deficient practice was corrected on 10/15/24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include: During an interview, on 10/18/24 at 8:42 a.m., the Executive Director indicated Resident B had received a total of 1000 ml (milliliters) of enteral feeding over a four (4) hour period via her J-tube. During an observation, on 10/18/24 at 1:29 p.m., the feeding pump was assessed. The Director of Nursing, Executive Director, Corporate Support Nurse and Regional [NAME] President of Operations were present. The history was not assessable as the pump had been disconnected from a power source since 10/14/24. The Executive Director indicated they had attempted to access the pump memory but kept receiving an error message. It was noted when the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct care plan meetings at least quarterly for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for care plan conferences/meetings. (Resident 5 and 59) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 10/8/24 at 1:49 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, chronic systolic heart failure, and hypertension. The last documented care plan meeting for Resident 5 was in March 2024. During an interview, on 10/10/24 at 2:34 p.m., the Social Service Director indicated the resident had a care plan in March of this year (2024). The resident should have had one in May and another one in early August. The resident was missing 2 care plan meetings. 2. The clinical record for Resident 59 was reviewed on 10/10/24 at 2:29 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hydronephrosis (a condition where one or both kidneys swell due to a buildup of urine), chronic atrial fibrillation, and acute chronic diastolic heart failure. The last documented care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were held according to the physician's ordered hold parameters for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 36 and 55) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 36 was reviewed on 10/10/24 at 11:02 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, essential hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. A physician's order, with a start date of 1/23/24, indicated to give metoprolol succinate (a blood pressure medication) 100 milligrams (mg) extended-release tablet once a day. Hold for a systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 110 or heart rate (HR) less than 60. A current care plan, with a start date of 1/30/24, indicated the resident was at risk for ineffective tissue perfusion related to hypertension and to administer medications as ordered. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated metoprolol succinate was administered on the following dates outside of the physician's ordered hold parameters: On 7/1/24, with a systolic blood pressure of 101…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure unlabeled food was not stored in a medication room refrigerator and medications were stored in the original containers in 1 of 2 medication rooms and 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. (200 hall refrigerator and 300 hall medication cart) Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview, on 10/11/24 at 11:49 a.m., the 200-hall medication room supplement refrigerator had 2 unlabeled cans of Canada Dry and a grocery sack with a to-go container of food in it which was unlabeled. Registered Nurse (RN) 3 indicated she was unsure who the 2 cans of Canada Dry and the food belonged to. They did not have labels on them, and they should have had labels. During an interview, on 10/11/24 at 12:05 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated food put in the refrigerator should be labeled.2. During an observation of the Moving Forward South medication cart there were 20 white oval tablets with marking 4H2 (cetirizine) and one round white table found in the bottom drawer. There was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff prepared pureed food in a sanitary manner for 1 of 1 staff member observed to puree food. (Cook 6) Finding includes: During an observation, on 10/8/24 at 10:36 a.m., [NAME] 6 was preparing pureed tuna casserole for lunch. During an observation, on 10/8/24 at 10:44 a.m., while preparing the pureed tuna casserole, [NAME] 6 licked the pureed tuna casserole off the first finger of her right hand. [NAME] 6 then attempted to take the food processor bowl off the base of the appliance to transfer the pureed food into a different container. During an interview, on 10/8/24 at 10:44 a.m., [NAME] 6 indicated she should not have licked the food off her finger and instead, she should have washed her hands. A current facility policy, titled Food Handling, dated 11/15 and received from the Director of Nursing on 10/10/24 at 8:49 a.m., indicated .To provide quality food that is handled in a safe and sanitary manner .All food preparation and serving areas shall be maintained in accordance with state and local…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a narcotic pain patch was administered at the correct time and new sites were used for the transdermal patch administration for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident B) and failed to ensure staff were signing the narcotic count sheets for 4 of 6 medication cart narcotic logs reviewed. Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 8/28/24 at 9:55 a.m., Resident B indicated she was experiencing pain and had been provided medication for the pain. The resident allowed observation of her Fentanyl pain patch. It was located on her right upper arm and dated 8/27/24. She indicated the patch was changed every three days. She was not aware of any missed doses of medications, including the narcotic pain patch. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 8/28/24 at 11:29 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fibromyalgia, chronic pain, and polyneuropathy. A physician's order, initiated on 12/30/23 and discontinued on 7/22/24, indicated to administer one Fentanyl patch 50 mcg per hour every 72…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received non-disposable utensils to eat their meals with for 17 of 17 residents reviewed for dining on the locked dementia unit. Finding includes: During an observation, on 10/5/23 at 11:34 a.m., the residents were sitting in the dementia dining area. The residents' trays were served by taking food off the tray. Plastic utensils were provided for all residents. During an observation, on 10/5/23 at 12:01 p.m., the residents in the main dining room were being served with non-disposable utensils. During an observation, on 10/11/23 at 11:42 a.m., the residents in the dementia dining room were being served paper napkins and plastic silverware including a spoon, knife, and fork. The staff put the residents' drinks in non-disposable plastic cups. During an interview, on 10/11/23 at 11:52 a.m., CNA 8 indicated a resident owned a restaurant and would take the silverware. CNA 8 indicated the resident might have gone after someone with a fork and everyone got plastic. During an interview, on 10/12/23 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $923K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN