No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Community Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

5600 E 16th St, Indianapolis, IN 46218 · Government - County · 115 certified beds · (317) 356-0911 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (317) 356-0911 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744)1 actual-harm citation$12,735 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $12,735 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-13)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Gallahue<0.1 mi
1640 N Ritter Ave · (317) 392-2564 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5543 E Washington St · (317) 359-8278 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1507 N Arlington Ave · (317) 600-3585 · Call to confirm hours
Park
N Emerson Ave · (317) 327-7275 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.7%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms21.1%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.8%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.1%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.8%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.7%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.5%79.0%79.4%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
1.33
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.38
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
67.7%
Total nursing turnover
77.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 44.9 residents a day — about 39% occupied, or roughly 70 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.33 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.67 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-23)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents reviewed for receipt of physician-ordered medications received their ordered anti-convulsant (seizure prevention medications) and/or anti-anxiety medications as ordered for 3 consecutive days, resulting in an increase in the number of seizures and a hospitalization related to the increase in seizures. (Resident B) Findings include:The clinical record of Resident B was reviewed on 11-12-25 at 11:14 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, traumatic hemorrhage of the cerebrum (brain bleed), seizures, general anxiety, impulse disorder, aphasia (does not speak/nonverbal). It indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], from an area hospital. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10-30-25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired, was nonverbal, had no concerns with his short-term memory, but his long-term memory was affected. The current physician's order indicated the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely initiate physician's orders for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions. (Resident 23) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 23 was reviewed on 4/20/26 at 8:30 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency (condition that prevented blood from returning to heart and caused blood to pool in lower extremities) A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, completed 3/25/26, indicated the resident had moderately impaired cognition and had no foot problems. A physician's order, dated 4/15/26, indicated the resident's right foot was to be wrapped in kerlix (type of gauze dressing) daily. The order was discontinued on 4/17/26. A care plan, initiated 4/16/26, indicated Resident 23 had an open blister on his right foot. He had intermittent edema (swelling) of his feet. He had a history of refusing treatments and labs at times. The goal was for the wound to heal without complications. A Skin and Wound note, dated 4/17/26, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely address residents' missing eyeglasses, ensure an ophthalmologist appointment was made and eye drops were administered as ordered for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for vision services. (Residents 8 and 10) Findings include:1.The clinical record for Resident 8 was reviewed on 4/20/26 at 8:30 a.m. The diagnosis included but was not limited to: dry eye syndrome (eyes do not produce enough tears). A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/31/26, indicated Resident 8 was cognitively intact. An eye visit report, dated 11/14/25, indicated Resident 8 has lost her eyeglasses. The eye doctor had recommended a new set of bifocals upon approval. An interview was conducted with Resident 8 on 4/20/26 at 8:42 a.m. She indicated she needed eyeglasses. She did have some, but they have been missing for a while. An interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 on 4/22/26 at 10:24 a.m. She indicated Resident 8 did wear eyeglasses, but the eyeglasses were unable to be found. An interview was conducted with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide fluids at the bedside for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hydration. (Resident C) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 4/21/2026 at 9:58 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, anxiety, and hypothyroidism (the thyroid gland fails to produce enough hormones, slowing metabolism). A physician's order, dated 5/1/25, indicated Resident C had a regular diet order with thin liquids. During an observation on 4/20/26 at 7:39 a.m., Resident C had a small clear cup of pink liquid sitting on a table across the room from Resident C's bed. During an observation on 4/21/26 at 10:27 a.m. and 2:13 p.m., Resident C did not have any fluids in her room or at her bedside. Resident C's bedside table was adjacent to her bed with a pillow lying on top. An observation of Resident C on 4/21/26 at 12:40 p.m., indicated she could independently hold a cup and drink through a straw without difficulties. During an observation on 4/23/26 at 9:50 a.m., Resident C had no fluids in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to change humidified oxygen for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident C) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 4/21/2026 at 9:58 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease that restricts airflow), and anxiety. A plan of care, dated 4/25/25, indicated Resident C had the potential for impaired gas exchange due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The interventions included, but were not limited to, administer oxygen as ordered. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/1/26, indicated Resident C was moderately cognitively impaired and received oxygen therapy. During an observation on 4/20/26 at 7:40 a.m., Resident C had an empty bottle of humidified oxygen, dated 4/13/26, hooked up to her oxygen concentrator. The April 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated Resident C had a new bottle of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility and the facility-contracted pharmacy failed to ensure an excessive dose of a medication was not administered to a resident for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident B).Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/20/26 at 10:12 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, completed 2/16/26, indicated Resident B was cognitively intact. A care plan, last reviewed 1/16/26, indicated the resident was at risk for adverse effects of hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) and hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) related to the use of glucose (blood sugar) lowering medications and a diagnosis of diabetes. The goal was for the resident not to experience hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia. The interventions included, but were not limited to, observe for signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, monitor blood sugar as ordered, and administer medications as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was clearly written for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for resident records. (Resident B)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/20/26 at 10:12 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, completed 2/16/26, indicated Resident B was cognitively intact. A physician's order, dated 1/20/26 with a start date of 1/27/26, indicated the resident was to receive Ozempic 1 mg/dose (4mg/3ml); 4 mg subcutaneously every Tuesday.A physician's progress note, dated 1/20/26, indicated Resident B's Ozempic was to be increased to 4 mg weekly. The first dose was to be given on 1/27/26.The March 2026 MAR did not contain documentation that Resident B had received her scheduled dose of Ozempic on 3/3 and 3/10/26. The March 2026 MAR did indicate the resident had received Ozempic 1 mg/dose (4mg/3ml); 4 mg subcutaneously on 3/24 and 3/31/26. The April 2026 MAR did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a resident's room in good repair contributing to a subsequent allegation of a resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for safe and clean environment. (Resident D)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 12/11/25 at 10:41 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to: major depressive disorder, cirrhosis of liver, liver transplant, severe alcohol dependence, and chronic kidney disease. The unedited 11/16/25, 7:33 a.m. nurse's note indicated, I was called to the first floor after a phone call from the police asking if there is problem. I replied that I would investigate. Upon reaching the first floor [name of Resident D] was yelling and accusing a new CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] of pushing him. She did not. The plumbing broke and spilled water on the floor. This was apparently the trigger of his anger The investigative file into the allegation of staff to resident abuse involving Resident D and CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) 2 was provided by the DNS (Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of staff to resident abuse to the ED (Executive Director) and IDOH (Indiana Department of Health) timely for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident D)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 12/11/25 at 10:41 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to: major depressive disorder, cirrhosis of liver, liver transplant, severe alcohol dependence, and chronic kidney disease. The 11/16/25, 7:00 a.m. nurse's note indicated, This writer was notified by a CNA that resident was cursing at her and yelling out false Accusations at approx [approximately] 5 am, situation began because of leaking water, staff was removed from res [resident's] room assignment and this writer instructed the staff to contact the ED [Executive Director] and DNS [Director of Nursing Services,] CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] spoke with DNS and DNS reported the situation to the ED, statements were written and left in ED office, Nurse on night shift was aware of situation and spoke with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide incontinent care timely for a dependent resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance (Resident F). Finding include:Review of the clinical record of Resident F on 12/10/25 at 11:08 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, muscle weakness, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. The plan of care for Resident F, dated 8/18/25, indicated the resident required assistance with ADL's. The interventions included, but were not limited to, assist with grooming, hygiene, toileting and incontinent care as needed. The resident concern/grievance form for Resident F, dated 11/10/25, indicated the resident's concern was she would turn on her call light to be provided incontinent care and the incontinent care was not provided in a timely manner resulting in the resident sitting in her own waste. The resident indicated this happened often. The grievance was marked resolved on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to transport a resident in wheelchair in a safe manner and failed to provide adequate monitoring for a resident who exited the facility without a responsible party for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident F and Resident B). Findings include:1. Review of the clinical record of Resident F on 12/10/25 at 11:08 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, muscle weakness, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident F, dated 11/18/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident was consistent and reasonable. The resident utilized a wheelchair for transportation and was dependent on staff for transport in the wheelchair. The resident did not ambulate. The progress note for Resident F, dated 9/20/25 at 2:13 p.m., indicated the resident complained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide oxygen as ordered by the physician and failed to maintain oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle in a sanitary manner for 1 of 1 random observation of oxygen use (Resident F). Review of the clinical record of Resident F on 12/10/25 at 11:08 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, muscle weakness, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. The plan of care for Resident F, dated 8/18/25, indicated the resident had impaired gas exchange and utilized oxygen. The interventions included, but were not limited to, administer oxygen as ordered. The December 2025 physician order for Resident F, indicated she was ordered oxygen 3 liters per nasal cannula every shift and change tubing and humidity every week on Sunday. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident F, dated 11/18/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident was consistent and reasonable. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's choice was honored pertaining to selection of food items of their choice for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 7/14/25 at 3:50 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, encephalopathy (group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction), hemiplegia (loss of strength leading to paralysis on one side of the body), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/3/25, indicated Resident B had moderate cognitive impairment, required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. A care plan, last revised 5/28/25, indicated Resident B required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) including eating and toileting. The approach included to provide assistance with eating as needed and assistance with toileting and/or incontinent care as needed related to Resident B being incontinent of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-14 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely implement a podiatry recommendation for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for foot care (Resident E).Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 7/14/25 at 2:15 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, polyneuropathy (disorder of the nervous system).A physician's order, dated 9/25/24, indicated Resident E could be seen by the Podiatrist.On 7/14/25 at 2:45 p.m., Resident E was observed with the Director of Nursing (DON) in her room. She was lying in her bed, and her feet were observed to have thick, yellowing, crusty toenails on both big toes. Resident E indicated she had been seen by the Podiatrist recently.A Podiatry Group note, dated 6/14/25, indicated she had been seen by the Podiatrist and the nails on both feet had been debrided (reduced in size). There was a recommended new order of urea 40% cream (medication for dry skin and damaged nails) to all toenails daily for sixty days. The clinical record did not contain an order for urea 40% cream to be applied to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was clean and in good repair, the staff contained their hair in the kitchen, and food was not open to air, labeled, dated and not expired. This had the potential to affect 54 of 54 residents that eat food prepared in the facility kitchen. B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to cover trash cans when not in use in the kitchen with the potential to affect 54 or 54 residents who receive food out of the facility kitchen. Findings include: A. On 4/21/25 at 6:25 p.m., the facility kitchen was observed with Dietary Aide (DA) 15. The walk- in refrigerator was observed to have a metal can of butterscotch pudding with a piece of plastic wrap covering the open can. The can did not contain a date on which it was opened. There was an undated plastic storage container of macaroni and cheese, an undated jar of beef base, an undated bottle of orange juice and grape juice which were half empty, an undated container of ranch and Caesar salad dressing, an undated jar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' respect and dignity were maintained for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity, 3 of 8 resident interviews in abuse investigations, and 3 residents randomly observed during dining. (Resident B, D, F, J, K, L, M, and N) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident J was reviewed on [DATE] at 11:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cellulitis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], indicated Resident J was cognitively intact. An interview was conducted with Resident J on [DATE] at 11:18 a.m. She indicated the staff were disrespectful during care. The staff needed training to not rush during care. They were rushing and jerk you around. It was rough, but not abusive. 2a. The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on [DATE] at 12:00 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression. The Quarterly MDS assessment, dated [DATE], indicated Resident D was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at palatable temperatures for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for food and 14 of 54 residents that attend resident council. (Residents' B, D, 22, J, K, 33, 28, 13, 31, 4, G, H, 25, 23, E, 41, 6, and 48) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident J was reviewed on 4/22/25 at 11:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cellulitis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/24/25, indicated Resident J was cognitively intact. An interview was conducted with Resident J on 4/22/25 at 11:18 a.m. She indicated the food was served cold. 2. The April 2025 resident council minutes were provided by the Activities Director on 4/23/25 at 9:31 a.m. The resident attendees were the following: Residents' 6, 23, H, 33, 41, 13, 25, 28, and G. The council indicated the food temperatures were not appropriate. During a resident council meeting on 4/23/25 at 11:05 a.m., the council attendees were the following: Residents' K, 33, 28, 13, 31, 4, G, H, 25, 23, E and 48. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on grievances for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for grievances. (Resident B and Resident 41) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/22/25 at 12:00 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 1/20/25, indicated she was cognitively intact. An interview was conducted with Resident B on 4/21/25 at 7:01 p.m. She indicated she had filed grievances and had not heard anything about a follow-up from the facility. Resident B indicated she was missing an arm sling, a backpack, a purse, and a box of crackers. An interview was conducted with the Social Services Consultant on 4/24/25 at 2:32 p.m. The Social Services Consultant indicated she could not find the grievances filled out by Resident B. Social Services Director (SSD) 4 indicated she spoke with Resident B and filled out grievances. SSD 4 indicated she did not know where the original grievances were located. 2. The clinical record for Resident 41 was reviewed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from abuse for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident 37 and Resident 42) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 42 was reviewed on 4/22/25 at 9:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, major depressive disorder, physical debility, unsteadiness on her feet, and anxiety disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/16/25, indicated Resident 42 was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident had impairments with her upper and lower extremities on one side. She utilized a walker and wheelchair. She required substantial assistance with dressing but was able to sit to stand independently with no assistance. A behavior care plan, dated 10/4/24, indicated Resident 42 had exhibited verbal aggression towards staff and anxiousness. 2. The clinical record for Resident 37 was reviewed on 4/22/25 at 9:57 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain evidence that an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident 37 and Resident 42). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 42 was reviewed on 4/22/25 at 9:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, major depressive disorder, physical debility, unsteadiness on her feet, and anxiety disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/16/25, indicated Resident 42 was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident had impairments with her upper and lower extremities on one side. She utilized a walker and wheelchair. She did need substantial assistance with dressing but was able to sit to stand independently with no assistance. 2. The clinical record for Resident 37 was reviewed on 4/22/25 at 9:57 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 3/24/25, indicated Resident 37 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely refer a resident with a new diagnosis of a psychiatric condition for a Level 2 assessment for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (Resident 33 and Resident 41). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 33 was reviewed on 4/22/25 at 2:33 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and schizoaffective disorder. A Psychiatric Progress Note, dated 5/15/24, indicated the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) had no history of serious mental illness, intellectual disability, or developmental disability. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 11/5/24, indicated Resident 33 was cognitively intact. The diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder was not included in the MDS assessment. A Physician's Assistant (PA) progress note, dated 11/4/24, indicated the diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder had an onset date of 10/30/24. The plan was to administer olanzapine (anti-psychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely pull a resident up in bed as requested repeatedly and provide consistent showers for 1 of 7 residents observed during medication administration and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. (Resident E and Resident B) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 4/22/25 at 10:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure, and stroke resulted in hemiplegia (loss of strength on one side). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/17/25, indicated Resident E was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident had upper and lower impairments on one side with substantial maximum assistance by a staff member to roll left and/or right and sit to lying position. An observation was conducted of Resident E during a medication administration with Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 10 on 4/21/25 at 6:47 p.m. The resident was observed in bed. The resident's head was not positioned at the top of the bed. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications and treatments as ordered for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for dignity, 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, and 1 of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. (Resident G, Resident 42, and Resident E) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident G was reviewed on 4/22/25 at 12:12 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, liver transplant and major depressive disorder. A physician's order, dated 10/10/24, indicated Resident G was to receive mycophenolate mofetil (immunosuppressive medication) 500 milligrams (mg) twice daily; to be given one hour prior or two hours after eating. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/24/25, indicated Resident G was cognitively intact. During an interview on 4/22/25 at 12:12 p.m., Resident G indicated he had a liver transplant and had gone several days without his immunosuppressive medications. The facility had run out of his medication. He was worried because he did not want to have his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's oxygen provided was as ordered for 1 of 7 residents observed during medication administration. (Resident E) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 4/22/25 at 10:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure, and stroke resulted in hemiplegia (loss of strength on one side). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 1/17/25, indicated Resident E was moderately cognitively impaired. A physician order, dated 9/25/24, indicated Resident E was to receive two liters of oxygen via nasal cannula (tubing that delivers oxygen through the nose) every shift. An observation was conducted of Resident E during a medication administration with Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 10 on 4/21/25 at 6:47 p.m. The resident was observed in bed with her nasal cannula out of her nose lying on her chest. QMA 10 educated the resident at that time; she needed the nasal cannula in her nose to receive the oxygen. QMA 10 assisted the resident with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate pain control for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for pain medication. (Resident D and Resident J) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 4/24/25 at 4:08 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed on 3/5/25, indicated she was cognitively intact. A physician's order, dated 3/4/25, indicated to administer Tylenol 1000 milligrams (mg) every six hours as needed for pain. During an interview with Resident D on 4/21/25 at 7:07 p.m., she indicated she asked Licensed Practical Nurse 5 (LPN 5) for Tylenol at 3:00 p.m. She indicated she was still waiting for LPN 5 to administer the requested Tylenol. An observation was conducted of an interview with LPN 5 with Nurse Consultant (NC) 13 on 4/21/25 at 8:20 p.m. LPN 5 indicated he had not gotten to Resident D's medication pass at that time. He was in the process of preparing medication for Resident D's roommate. NC 13 requested LPN 5 to stop…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely document behaviors and to initiate new interventions to the plan of care for a resident with dementia with behaviors of wandering and urinating in inappropriate places for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident H) Findings include: 1a. The clinical record for Resident H was reviewed on 4/22/25 at 2:40 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behavioral disturbance, Alzheimer's disease, and anxiety. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 2/24/25, indicated Resident H was severely cognitively impaired, was able to ambulate 150 feet in the corridor with supervision of staff, and was occasionally incontinent of urine. 1b. The clinical record for Resident 41 was reviewed on 4/23/25 at 2:00 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, borderline personality disorder. A Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 9/16/24, indicated Resident 41 was cognitively intact. Resident H's clinical record contained a progress note, dated 1/29/25, which indicated Resident H had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely follow-up on pharmacy recommendations for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident B) Findings include: A. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/22/25 at 12:00 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 1/20/25, indicated she was cognitively intact. A pharmacy recommendation, dated 2/19/25, indicated the discontinuation of fenofibrate (used together with a proper diet to reduce and treat high cholesterol and triglyceride [fat- like substance] levels in the blood) 54 milligrams (mg) daily. If medication was discontinued a fasting lipid panel was to be collected at the 4-week mark and every 12 months. On 2/29/25 the Doctor of Medicine (MD) signed the pharmacy recommendation in agreement to discontinue fenofibrate and lab recommendations. The MD ordered a fasting lipid panel to be drawn on 3/3/25. A physician's order, dated 2/19/25, was noted for a lipid panel lab draw for 3/3/25. The facility was unable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure open and/or expiration dates were on insulin medication for 1 of 3 medication carts observed. (Resident 7, Resident 22, and Resident F) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 7 was reviewed on 4/22/25 at 11:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus. A physician order, dated 9/4/24, indicated the staff was to administer 18 units of Novolin (intermediate-acting insulin) twice a day. 2. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 4/22/25 at 11:45 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus. A physician order, dated 3/11/25, indicated the staff was to administer 24 units of Humalog (fast acting insulin) three times a day. 3. The clinical record for Resident 22 was reviewed on 4/22/25 at 12:00 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus. A physician order, dated 4/18/25, indicated the resident was to receive a sliding scale of lispro insulin (fast acting insulin) three times a day. An observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained by utilizing hand hygiene prior to administering eye drop medications and to follow infection control practices by not timely removing feces and urine from a bedside table, and failure to wear a gown while disposing of bodily fluids for a resident in Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 2 of 7 residents observed during medication administration and 1 of 1 resident observed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions. (Resident H, Resident 29 and Resident 27) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident H was reviewed on 4/21/25 at 6:30 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, glaucoma (eye condition that damages optic nerve). A physician order, dated 4/17/25, indicated the resident was to receive one drop of timolol eye drops in both eyes twice a day. An observation was conducted of eye drop administration to Resident H with Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 10 on 4/21/25 at 6:35 p.m. QMA 10 was observed at the medication cart pulling the medications for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote a homelike environment for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for environment (Residents L, 9, and 17). Findings include: An observation was made on 4/21/25 at 7:49 p.m. The blinds in Resident L's room were broken. An observation was made on 4/22/25 at 9:41 a.m. Resident 9's room smelled strongly like urine and there was an area of scraped paint on the wall behind the bed. An observation was made on 4/22/25 at 10:14 a.m. The blinds in Resident 17's room were broken. In an interview with Resident 17, on 4/25/25 at 1:18 p.m., he indicated the broken blinds bothered him, especially when he had company, and they had been that way for three years. A walk-through tour was conducted with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) and Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) on 04/25/25 at 1:10 p.m. During the tour, Resident L and Resident 17's blinds were broken. Resident 9's room smelled like urine and the paint on the wall was scraped. The MS was interviewed on 4/25/25 at 1:14 p.m. He indicated he was aware of the broken blinds in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve breakfast at safe and palatable temperatures with the potential to affect 54 of 55 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: During a Resident Council meeting on 4/16/24 at 3:00 p.m., 8 of 10 residents who attended indicated that breakfast was often served cold. During an interview on 4/17/24 at 11:06 a.m., Resident 43 indicated that breakfast was served cold most days. A grievance form, dated 4/10/24, indicated that Resident B had a concern that the food was sometimes cold. On 4/18/24 at 8:25 a.m., breakfast service was observed in the facility kitchen. Three plates of fried eggs and 1 plate of scrambled eggs were observed sitting on the counter in back of the steam table. Seven plates of fried eggs were observed sitting on the shelf above the stove. FC (Facility Cook) 5 was observed taking a plate of fried eggs from the counter behind the steam table and placing them on a tray to be served. The tray was taken from the serving area and served to a resident. At 8:35 a.m., the DM (Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the first-floor shower room in good condition and to timely repair a leaking pipe for the pot filler in the kitchen with the potential to affect 55 of 55 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: 1. On 4/16/24 at 12:00 p.m., the facility kitchen was observed with the RD (Registered Dietician) and the (DM) Dietary Manager A pipe located to the side of the stove was observed to have a clear pasty substance present at the joints and rusted joint clamps. The copper pipe had a heavy patinated appearance. There was a puddle of water present under the pipe. The DM indicated the water on the floor was because the pipe of the pot filler was leaking and believed a work order had been done. The RD indicated that due to the appearance of the pipe and the rust present on the pipe clamps, the pipe had been leaking for a while. On 4/18/24 at 2:03 p.m., the Executive Director provided a service request, dated 4/16/24, requesting service to the water leak in the kitchen. 2. During an interview on 4/17/24 at 11:04 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely provide assistance with dressing for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for ADL (Acts of Daily Living) care (Resident 6). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 6 was reviewed on 4/16/24 at 3:21 p.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, dementia and heart failure. A care plan, initiated 6/16/2020, indicated Resident 6 required assistance with ADL care related to his dementia, heart failure and muscle weakness. The goal was for him to improve current functional status. The interventions included, but were not limited to, assist with toileting and/or incontinent care, start date 6/16/2020, and assist with dressing, grooming, and hygiene as needed. Encourage him to do as much for self as possible, start date 6/16/2020. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, completed 3/4/24, indicated he had moderately impaired cognition and needed cues and supervision with dressing. On 4/16/24 at 3:21 p.m., Resident 6 was observed sitting in his wheelchair in his room. He was wearing a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident's skin condition; timely clarify the dosage and administration time of a resident's antipsychotic medication; administer insulin as ordered; and monitor frequency of bowel movements for a resident with constipation for 1 of 1 resident review for constipation, 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for skin conditions. (Residents B and 27) Findings include: 1a. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/17/24 at 9:00 a.m. The diagnoses for Resident B included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, borderline personality disorder, somatization disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and bipolar disorder. A care plan dated 4/17/24 indicated .Resident is at risk for adverse effects of hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia related to use of glucose lowering medication and/or diagnosis of diabetes mellitus .Approach .medications as ordered .Monitor blood sugars as ordered . A physician order dated 4/1/24 indicated Resident B was to receive 10 units of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oral care, as ordered by the physician, and to timely obtain a physician's order to provide gastrostomy tube site care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding (Resident 23). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 23 was reviewed on 4/16/24 at 2:40 p.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, dysphagia (inability to swallow), aphasia (inability to speak), and gastrostomy (g-tube). A care plan, initiated 11/8/2018, indicated Resident 23 was at risk for complications related to enteral feedings. The goal was for him to be free from complications related to enteral feeding. The approaches included, but were not limited to, cleanse around site as ordered, initiated 11/8/2018, and elevate head of bead, initiated 11/08/2018. A physician's order, dated 1/28/2021, indicated to provide oral care every shift. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, completed 3/28/24, indicated his long- and short-term memory was intact. He was independent with decision making and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-22 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately monitor and document behaviors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for mood and behaviors and 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents 38 and 45) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 45 was reviewed on 4/17/24 at 1:43 p.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to: schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, insomnia, neurocognitive disorder, encephalopathy, and extrapyramidal and movement disorder. He was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from another skilled nursing facility. The 1/14/24 New/Worsening Behavior Communication Event indicated Resident 45 grabbed a female staff's breast/buttocks inappropriately. The intervention attempted in response to the behavior was to explain that it was inappropriate and encouraged not to do it again. The effectiveness of the interventions were somewhat effective, but Resident 45 did it again after the first action. The interventions put into place to prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent for 1 of 5 residents observed during medication pass. There were 34 opportunities with 2 errors resulting in a 5.88% medications error rate. The errors involved 1 resident (Resident 43) in the sample of 5. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 43 was reviewed on 4/17/24 at 1:00 p.m. The diagnosis for Resident 43 included, but was not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus. A care plan dated 2/27/24 indicated staff was to obtain blood sugars as ordered. The Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 43 was cognitively intact. A physician order dated 1/9/24 indicated the staff was to obtain blood sugars four times a day. The scheduled times were 8:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., 4:00 p.m., and 8:00 p.m. A physician order dated 4/16/24 indicated the resident was to receive 22 units of lantus insulin. A physician order dated 4/17/24 indicated the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$12,735 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $12,735 — penalty dated 2025-11-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.4-2.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 89 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Valparaiso Care & RehabilitationValparaiso, IN 2 of 5Arbor Grove VillageGreensburg, IN 2 of 5Bethany VillageIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Columbia Healthcare CenterEvansville, IN 2 of 5Eagle Valley MeadowsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Harcourt Terrace Nursing And RehabilitationIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Harrison TerraceIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Hickory Creek At New CastleNew Castle, IN 2 of 5Maple Park VillageWestfield, IN 2 of 5Park Terrace VillageEvansville, IN 2 of 5Riverside VillageElkhart, IN 2 of 5Trailpoint VillageSouth Bend, IN 2 of 5University Nursing CenterUpland, IN 2 of 5Williamsport Nursing And RehabilitationWilliamsport, IN 3 of 5Allisonville MeadowsFishers, IN 3 of 5American VillageIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Brownsburg MeadowsBrownsburg, IN 3 of 5Countryside MeadowsAvon, IN 3 of 5East Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterElkhart, IN 3 of 5Hickory Creek At CrawfordsvilleCrawfordsville, IN 3 of 5Hillcrest VillageJeffersonville, IN 3 of 5North Capitol Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Rosebud VillageRichmond, IN 3 of 5Rosewalk VillageIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Rosewalk Village At LafayetteLafayette, IN 3 of 5Spring Mill MeadowsIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Stonebrooke Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation CentreWabash, IN 4 of 5Beech Grove MeadowsBeech Grove, IN 4 of 5Clark Rehabilitation And Skilled Nursing CenterClarksville, IN 4 of 5Clinton GardensClinton, IN 4 of 5Creekside VillageMishawaka, IN 4 of 5Edgewater WoodsAnderson, IN 4 of 5Forest Creek VillageIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Franklin MeadowsFranklin, IN 4 of 5Heritage House Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterConnersville, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At ColumbusColumbus, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At MadisonMadison, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At PeruPeru, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At RochesterRochester, IN

Showing 40 of 89; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DRUMMER, CARLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
FEHRIBACH, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/14/2004
HANIFY, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
LAZARD, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/29/2021
MANTRAVADI, GEETAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/21/2021
MUKES-GAITHER, BEVERLYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
PAYNE, MONICAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/09/2021
BABCOCK, PAULIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/30/2020
CAINE, VIRGINIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/10/1994
HARRIS, LISAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/22/2003
AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/26/2026
DICE, MARKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
HEATH, GENEVAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/09/2026
LAPSLEY, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/18/2026
SHANE, ANDREWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
VAN CAMP, STEVENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
YATES, PATRICEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$472K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 88%Medicare 1%Other / private 11%

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $472K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$373per resident / day
operating cost
$11,334per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$308per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155029. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next