Brownsburg Meadows

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 211 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 102 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 147 beds and averages 131.2 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was mechanically transferred using proper technique, resulting in harm when a resident had a fall resulting in an avulsion fracture at the tip of the distal fibula for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls with injury (Resident D). Findings include: A Facility Reported Incident (FRI), dated 8/30/25 at 4:39 p.m., indicated on 8/29/25 Resident D was being assisted with a transfer out of her wheelchair by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 10 when the resident began to experience pain in her right foot. The resident was gently lowered to the floor. On 8/31/25 Resident D was diagnosed with a probable subacute nondisplaced demineralized medial cuneiform (bones between the toes and ankle) fracture. The resident's activity level was upgraded to include non-weight bearing on the right lower extremity (RLE), and total mechanical lift for all transfers. On 9/3/25 at 2:28 p.m., Resident D was observed in a wheelchair (WC) at bedside, wearing a controlled ankle motion boot (CAM boot - a specialized walking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's right to dignity when she was kissed by a facility bus driver for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident abuse (Resident B). Findings include:A facility reported incident (FRI), dated 2/24/26 at 4:01 p.m., indicated Resident B reported a bus driver placed an unwanted kiss her on the forehead during transport. Bus Driver 5 was suspended pending investigation then later brought back with education. The resident care plan and profile were reviewed and updated, and the resident would be transported by third-party vendor to future appointments. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 4/15/26 at 11:32 a.m. Resident B was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included spinal stenosis with fusion of the lumbosacral spine and admission for orthopedic aftercare. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed on 2/3/26, assessed Resident B as being cognitively intact with no documentation of behaviors or rejection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-10-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' narcotic medications were protected from diversion resulting in 21 missing Oxycodone (a Schedule II narcotic medication) tablets, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation (Resident B). This deficient practice was corrected by 9/29/25 prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance.Findings include:A Facility Reported Incident (FRI), dated 9/19/25 at 3:59 p.m., indicated a medication discrepancy was found with Resident B's pain medication from the pharmacy. The Executive Director (ED), Director of Nursing Services (DNS), Physician (MD), Power of Attorney (POA), pharmacy, police department, and Adult Protective Services (APS) were notified, and a consumer complaint was filed. Registered Nurse (RN) 6 was suspended pending investigation and subsequently terminated. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed 10/16/25 at 10:45 a.m. Diagnoses on Resident B's profile included traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness (brain bleed), and chronic obstructive pulmonary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-10-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system for the reconciliation of controlled medications, resulting in diversion of at least 369 Oxycodone (a Schedule II narcotic medication) tablets from 4 of 4 hallways reviewed for diversion of narcotics (100, 200, 300, and 400 hallways). This deficient practice was corrected by 9/29/25 prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past NoncomplianceFindings include:A Facility Reported Incident (FRI), dated 9/19/25 at 3:59 p.m., indicated a medication discrepancy was found with Resident B's pain medication from the pharmacy. The Executive Director (ED), Director of Nursing Services (DNS), Physician (MD), Power of Attorney (POA), pharmacy, police department, and Adult Protective Services (APS) were notified, and a consumer complaint was filed. Registered Nurse (RN) 6 was suspended pending investigation and subsequently terminated.A Controlled Medication Reconciliation pharmacy audit report dated 8/22/25 - 9/22/25, documented 14 residents having been audited for narcotic medications. The audit indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain resident weights as ordered for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for weights (Resident 74 and 107). B. Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a newly admitted resident, (Resident C) had physician's orders in place and treatments rendered for a new surgical wound upon his admission for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. C. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident's (Resident B) physician's ordered were followed to apply and remove a transdermal medication patch for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: A1. On [DATE] at 11:04 a.m., a record review was completed for Resident 74. She had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to dementia, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), depression, and insomnia. She had an order, dated [DATE], to obtain her weight weekly on Monday. Her weight was not obtained on [DATE], [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to date insulin and eye drops when opened and failed to remove expired tuberculin serum and insulin from the refrigerator for 3 of 6 medication carts and 2 of 4 medication rooms. Findings include: On [DATE] at 1:03 p.m., 200 hall medication cart was observed. Resident 282 had an insulin pen dated [DATE]. Resident 281 had a vial of folic acid inside the refrigerator on 200-hall that was undated. The 300-hall medication cart was observed. Resident 25 had a NovoLog insulin pen undated, and glargine insulin pen undated. Resident 86 had an insulin pen Semglee with no date to indicate when it was opened. Resident 38 had a bottle of brimodine 0.2% with no date to indicate when it was opened. The 300-hall medication room was observed. Inside the refrigerator was a vial of tuberculin serum that had a date of [DATE] on it. The 400-hall back medication cart was observed. Resident 1 had a insulin pen glargine with no date to indicate when it was opened. On [DATE] at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0624 — isolated
  Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and orderly discharge from the facility for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 118) reviewed for transfers and discharges. Findings include: On 4/21/25 at 9:58 a.m. Resident 118 was observed as she lay in bed. There was a catheter drainage bag hanging on the side of the bed, with a small amount of dark yellow urine in the tubing. Resident 118 indicated that she was unhappy with her stay at the facility, and she wanted to leave. She did not know why she had a catheter, and she complained of being constipated for a week. On 4/24/25 11:04 a.m. Resident 118's medical record was reviewed. She was a rehabilitation resident whose diagnoses included but were not limited to malignant neoplasm of the larynx (throat cancer), constipation, and urinary tract infection (UTI). A progress note, dated 4/21/25 at 1:38 p.m., indicated an unidentified staff member was walking past the nurses' station when Resident 118 and her family member walked by with a couple of bags with them. They indicated Resident 118 was going…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a newly admitted resident, (Resident C) had a baseline care plan in place to address his immediate medical needs for a new surgical wound upon his admission for 1 of 3 new admission records reviewed. Findings include: 1. On 4/21/25 at 9:50 a.m. Resident C's wife was observed as she left the hall and stopped a nurse to ask about her husband's leg. She indicated to the unidentified nurse that his leg was still bleeding and had gotten all over his sheets. On 4/21/25 at 10:32 a.m., Resident C was observed as he laid in bed. He had a left below the knee amputation (BKA) which was wrapped up however, he had bleed through the dressing and bandage. A folded sheet had been placed under his soiled dressing and there was a moderate amount of bright red stains on the white sheet as well. Resident C indicated, he admitted to the facility on Friday the 18th. Everything had been find at the hospital after his amputation, but shortly after he arrived to the facility, he noticed he started bleeding through the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident 87) received care plan revisions to implement new goals and/or approaches to address her diabetic management for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: On 4/22/25 at 9:00 a.m., Resident 87 was observed in bed. A over-bed table with a breakfast tray was observed in front of her, but Resident 87 indicated she did not want to eat her breakfast. Resident 87 indicated she did not like the food and because of her diabetes, there were certain things she could or could not eat. On 4/23/25 at 10:16 a.m., Resident 87's medical record was reviewed. She was a long-term care resident with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to diabetes mellitus type II (a blood sugar disorder) and kidney failure. A nursing progress note, dated 2/21/25 at 10:14 p.m., indicated, Resident 87 had refused all evening medications and refused to have her blood glucose checked. She was asked three separate times but remained adamant about her refusal. An interdisciplinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prevent the potential for accidents when medications were left bedside with residents without self-administration assessments for 2 of 2 random observations (Residents 78 and 118), and when a nurse was observed leaving medications unattended on top of the medication cart during a medication pass observation which had the potential to affect 2 of 2 residents in the hallway when the medication was unattended. Findings include: 1. On 4/20/25 at 9:46 a.m. Resident 78 was observed sitting up in his wheelchair. On his bedside table was a clear cup and inside there were 7 pills ranging in color and size. Resident 78 indicated he had not taken them yet because he had an upset stomach. He indicated the nurse left them there for him to take. A record review was completed. Resident 78 had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to cerebral infarction (stroke), type 2 diabetes, difficulty swallowing, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. On 4/23/25 at 1:30 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated Resident 78 lacked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the medical record reflected accurate documentation of a pressure injury for a resident for 1 of 25 residents reviewed for accurate documentation (Resident 16). Findings include: On 4/22/25 at 10:15 a.m., Resident 16 was observed as he lay in bed. He was pleasantly confused at times, but he could answer most questions appropriately. He had a pressure-relieving boot on his right heel and another pressure-relieving boot was on the floor at the foot of the bed. On 4/24/25 at 1:35 p.m., Resident 16's medical record was reviewed. He was a long-term care resident whose diagnoses included but were not limited to Type 2 Diabetes and Urinary Tract Infections (UTI). A progress note, dated 11/15/24 at 10:35 p.m., indicated Resident 16 arrived at the facility in a wheelchair with bilateral edema in his lower extremities and a pressure ulcer on his right heel. A progress note, dated 3/16/25 9:59 p.m., indicated Resident 16 had a dressing changed to his right heel ulcer. An admission assessment, dated 11/15/24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN