Harrison Terrace

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 77.4 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by Resident F hitting Resident G in the eye for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident F and Resident G). The deficient practice was correct on 5/7/26 prior to the start of the survey, and therefore past noncompliance. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 6/03/26 at 9:30 a.m. The diagnosis included but was not limited to: dementia (decline in mental ability) and delusional disorder (beliefs that are not reality).A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 4/30/26, indicated Resident F was cognitively impaired. The resident had no upper or lower extremity impairments. She independently ambulated with walker. 2. The clinical record for Resident G was reviewed on 6/03/26 at 10:00 a.m. The diagnosis included but was not limited to: dementia (decline in mental ability).An admission MDS Assessment, dated 2/12/26, indicated Resident G was cognitively impaired.A nursing note for Resident F, dated 5/6/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the implementation of a care in pairs intervention that were put in place for behavior management for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/2/26 at 1:30 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia (decline in mental ability) and psychotic and mood disturbance (emotional disturbances combined with detachment of reality).An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 4/16/26, indicated Resident B was cognitively impaired. A behavior care plan, dated 4/13/26, indicated Resident B would become aggressive with staff, hitting them, yell and/or curse, become combative with redirection and may make threatening statements towards his peers.and staff. At times will turn on his call light, when staff arrive to help, he responds with insults, inappropriate, foul language, and delusional thinking. Resident would state that he owns the facility and that people are using his name to purchase things. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were utilizing infection control practices with hand hygiene during a dining observation in Mapleton Dining Room. This had potential to affect 16 of 16 residents observed in the dining room. (Resident 43 and Resident 68) Findings include: An observation was conducted of the Mapleton Unit dining room during a lunch meal service on 9/2/25 at 12:06 p.m. Activities Director (AD) was observed passing out silverware at each table for the residents in the dining room. During that time, AD was reaching inside container pulling out silverware and placing it on napkins. Then touching his face and eyeglasses. There was no observation of AD utilizing hand hygiene after touching his face and eyeglasses. After, AD was observed passing out meal trays and assisting residents with beverages. During that time, he was observed pulling up his pants. There was no observation of hand hygiene after he touched and pulled up his pants. During an observation of the Mapleton Unit dining room on 9/2/25 at 12:07 p.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free of odor, clean and in good repair with linens and walls for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for physical environment. (Residents' D, F, G, and H) Findings include: A. During the initial tour of the facility on 9/2/25 at 9:55 a.m., the main entry smelled strongly of urine. Upon entering the Meridian Hills Unit, the floor in the hallway was sticky, especially around rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. The floor between the entrance door and the nurse's station had an approximate six-inch black spot. There was a wet floor sign in the dining room beside the spot. During an observation on 9/2/25 at 2:28 p.m., the floor on the Meridian Hills Unit, between the entrance door and the nurse's station, had an approximate six-inch black spot. During a Confidential Interview 20, they indicated the Meridian Unit does have a urine odor. B. Upon entering the Mapleton Unit on 9/2/25 at 9:57 a.m., a strong urine odor was noted. An observation was conducted of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had his face washed and shaved for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. (Resident K) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident K was reviewed on 9/2/25 at 10:55 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and acute osteomyelitis. A care plan, last reviewed/revised on 8/21/25 and obtained from the electronic health record on 9/4/25 at 9:19 a.m., indicated Resident K needed assistance with ADL care. The goal was for him to maintain his current functional status. The interventions included, but were not limited to, assisting with bathing as needed, assisting with dressing, grooming and hygiene as needed, and encouraging him to do as much for himself as possible. A care plan, last reviewed/revised on 8/21/25 and obtained from the electronic health record on 9/4/25 at 9:19 a.m., indicated Resident has a DX [Diagnosis] of Vascular Dementia. Resident has impaired daily decision-making skills and poor insight into care. Resident will refuse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer an antibiotic as ordered by the physician, obtain blood sugars and administer insulin as ordered by the physician, and to administer insulin per the manufacturer's guidelines for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 2 of 20 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident K, Resident F, Resident 20, and Resident 59)Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 9/2/25 at 10:55 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and acute osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) of the right ankle and foot. A Significant Change of Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 8/15/25, indicated he was severely cognitively impaired. A care plan, initiated 7/31/25, indicated Resident F had impaired skin integrity with a pressure injury to the sacrum and right heel. The goal was for his wounds to heal without complications. The interventions included, but were not limited to, obtain labs as ordered, provide treatment as ordered by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care planned fall interventions were implemented appropriately for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 22)Findings include: On 9/3/25 at 9:45 A.M., Resident 22 was observed in her room in her bed. The resident's wheelchair was several feet away from the resident near the other bed in the room but was still visible to the resident from where she was lying. A black recliner with a remote control was in the room a few feet away from the resident to the right of her bed.On 9/3/25 at 12:57 P.M., the resident was observed in her room in her bed. The resident's wheelchair was several feet away from the resident near the foot of the other bed in the room but was still visible to the resident from where she was lying. A black recliner with a remote control was in the room a few feet away from the resident to the right of her bed.On 9/4/25 at 10:01 A.M., the resident was observed in her room in her bed. The resident's wheelchair was a few feet away from the resident in between the two beds in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the urinary output for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheter. (Resident 49) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 49 was reviewed on 9/5/25 9:32 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and retention of urine. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 8/7/25, indicated he was severely cognitively impaired. A physician's order, dated 8/28/25, indicated he should receive catheter care, and the nurse was to record the urinary output every shift. The August and September 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) did not include documentation of Resident 49's urinary output each shift.The urinary output documented in the electronic health record (EHR), under vital signs, were as follows:8/29/25- night shift large, day shift large, evening shift medium,8/30/25- day shift large, evening shift 500 milliliters (ml), night shift large,8/31/25- night shift medium, day shift large,9/1/25- night shift…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely develop and implement an individualized plan of care for a resident with dementia who displayed a new behavior of making physical contact with peers for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident B and Resident C). Findings include: 1a. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 9/2/25 at 11:37 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, anxiety, and insomnia. He was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 1b. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 9/3/25 at 8:55 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with psychotic disturbances and psychotic disorder with delusions. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident C had room changes on the following dates: 5/27/25, 7/1/25, 7/16/25, 7/24/25, and 7/25/25.A Social Service Progress Note, dated 7/24/25 at 12:11 p.m., indicated Resident C's daughter gave approval for him to move rooms. A Social Service Progress Note, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0914 — isolated
  Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy curtains that extended completely around the bed in a room shared by two residents for 2 of 2 residents randomly observed for privacy. (Resident 16 and Resident 49)Findings include: 1 a. The clinical record for Resident 49 was reviewed on 9/5/25 9:32 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and retention of urine. 1 b. The clinical record for Resident 16 was reviewed on 9/8/25 at 10:20 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. On 9/8/25 at 9:50 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 12 and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) were observed providing urinary catheter care for Resident 49. Resident 49's privacy curtain was drawn between Resident 49 and Resident 16. The privacy curtain for Resident 49's bed did not go around the entirety of the ceiling track and did not obscure view from the room walkway leading to the bathroom. Resident 16's privacy curtain did not extend the entirety of the track and did provide total visual privacy for his bed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $762K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN