Park Terrace Village
25 S Boehne Camp Rd, Evansville, IN 47712 · Non profit - Other · 96 certified beds · (812) 423-7468 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.7% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.7% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.4% | 25.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 3.9% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.0% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 33.0% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.7% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.0% | 3.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.2% | 23.3% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.6% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 70.0% | 79.0% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.0%CMS range 39.2–72.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 7.7–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 88.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 60.7 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.94 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served in a sanitary manner for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. (Kitchen) Finding includes: On 11/18/25 at 8:57 a.m., an observation was made of the kitchen. The following was observed:Dirt and debris on the floor, behind the stove, fryer, convection oven, and steamer.Dirt and debris under stainless steel tables and under racks. Debris and grease on top of the stove, sides of the stove, and sides of the fryer.Dirt and debris behind the ice machine, steam table, and plate warmer debris observed on surfaces. Dirt and debris on the floor and under the racks in the dry pantry. On 11/18/25 at 11:11 a.m., the same was observed. On 11/18/25 at 11:13 a.m., the Dietary Manager indicated the kitchen is cleaned daily, floors are usually cleaned at night, but did not get done last night due to being short-staffed. The staff follow a cleaning schedule. On 11/18/25 at 11:29 a.m., the Administrator provided the current policy on kitchen cleanliness with an original date of 06/25. The policy included, but was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of and labeling of medications for 3 of 5 medication carts and 1 of 2 wound treatment carts. Loose pills, food, and unlabeled medications were observed in the medication and treatment cart drawers. (Treatment Cart for B Hall, A Hall Medication Cart, B Hall Medication Cart, C Hall Medication Cart) Findings include: 1. On 3/4/25 at 10:49 A.M., the Treatment Cart for the B Hall was observed with the following: 1 bottle of Peri cleaner(cleaner) without label or resident name 1 can of soda in the third drawer in the third drawer 1 pair of toenail clippers no resident name or storage bag 2. On 3/4/25 at 11:00 A.M., the B Hall Medication Cart was observed to have an open package of chewing gum without identification of ownership. 3. On 3/4/25 at 11:15 A.M., the A Hall Medication Cart was observed with the following: 1 small round pill with the number 11 1 small round orange pill with the letter F and the number 50 1 bottle of Acetaminophen (pain medication) 500 milligrams (Mg) without label or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely store and produce food under professional standards related to food items not labeled or stored properly and sanitary kitchen surfaces for 1 of 1 dietary areas observed. Findings include: During a kitchen walk through on 3/4/25 at 9:03 A.M., the following was observed: Walk in refrigerator: One pitcher labeled sweet tea, no date One pitcher labeled apple juice, dated 2/28 use by 3/1 One opened bag and two closed bags of wilting lettuce, best by date 2/23/25 Bag of sliced American cheese, opened 2/26 use 3/4 Bag of shredded cheese, opened 2/26 use 3/4 Bag of mozzarella cheese open to air, opened 2/24 use by 3/3 Walk in freezer: Bag of Canadian bacon, dated 2/6 use by 2/9 Bag of meatballs, dated 2/20 Dry storage: Box of loaves of bread directly on floor Opened bag of instant mashed potatoes, no date Opened of penne pasta, dated 1/18 Opened of macaroni noodles, no date Opened bag of egg noodles, no date Opened bag of [NAME] rigate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices and standards were performed during 3 of 3 random observations. Staff observed not performing hand hygiene during a medication pass of B Hall, using Enhanced Barrier Protection (EBP), and changing gloves during care. ( Resident 28, Resident 39, Resident 19, Resident 48, Resident 41, Resident 18, Resident 22, Resident 3) Findings include: 1. On 3/6/25 at 7:19 A.M., during a random observation of a medication pass, Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 14 failed to perform hand sanitization prior to entering Resident 28's room. On 3/6/25 at 7:25 A.M., during a random observation of a medication pass, QMA 14 failed to perform hand hygiene prior to entering and exiting Resident 39's room. On 3/6/25 at 7:32 A.M., during a random observation of a medication pass, QMA 14 failed to perform hand hygiene prior to entering and exiting Resident 19's room. On 3/6/25 at 7:38 A.M., during a same random observation of a medication pass, QMA 14 sneezed into sleeve without performing hand hygiene…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity during a meal observation for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed for activities of daily living who required staff assistance to eat. (Resident 3) Finding includes: During an interview on 3/4/25 at 10:04 A.M., a family member indicated Resident 3 is not able to feed herself, and staff not always willing to assist her with eating. On 3/5/25 at 10:20 A.M., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 3's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertensive heart disease and congestive heart failure (CHF). The most recent Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 2/15/25, indicated Resident 3 was severely cognitively impaired and was dependant on staff (staff do all of the work) for eating, toileting, showering, and transfers, and received oxygen therapy. Current care plans included, but were not limited to: Resident requires assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living) including bed mobility, transfers, eating and toileting related to:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents that were self administering medications were assessed for capability to self administer medications for 1 of 1 residents observed with medications in their room. (Resident 8) Finding includes: On 3/4/25 at 10:04 A.M., a white pill and a red pill were observed in a medication cup on Resident 8's bedside table. On 3/5/25 at 12:25 P.M., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus and major depressive disorder. The most recent Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/16/25, indicated Resident 8 was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for rolling left to right, toileting, and bathing, and received antianxiety medication, antidepressants, hypnotics, anticoagulants, diuretics, opioids, and hypoglycemic medications during the seven day look back period (1/10/25 to 1/16/25). The clinical record lacked an assessment, order, and care plan related to the resident's ability to self administer medications. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory services were provided according to professional standards for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. Residents were receiving oxygen at a flow rate that was not consistent with the physician order.(Resident 8, Resident 3, Resident 47) Findings include: 1. On 3/4/25 at 10:10 A.M., Resident 8 was observed lying in bed receiving 4 liters (L) of oxygen via nasal cannula. At that time, Resident 8 indicated she was supposed to receive 3 L of oxygen. On 3/5/25 at 12:35 P.M., Resident 8 was observed lying in bed receiving 4 L of oxygen via nasal cannula. On 3/6/25 at 1:18 P.M., Resident 8 was observed lying in bed receiving 4 L of oxygen via nasal cannula. On 3/5/25 at 12:25 P.M., Resident 8's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The most recent Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/16/25, indicated Resident 8 was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff to roll left and right,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly prevent and/or contain COVID-19. Staff were observed not properly wearing PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) and practicing infection control practices. (Resident H, 200 unit) Finding includes: On 10/1/24 at 9:00 a.m., the Administrator indicated the facility had 16 residents who were COVID-19 positive. On 10/1/24 at 9:55 a.m., LPN 2 was observed to be wearing a gown, gloves, face shield, and a surgical mask underneath an N-95 mask before entering room [ROOM NUMBER], a COVID-19 positive room. room [ROOM NUMBER] had COVID-19 isolation precautions posted on the door. LPN 2 was observed to exit room [ROOM NUMBER] wearing the surgical mask, walk to the medication cart, laid the N-95 mask and face shield on top of a binder on the cart. LPN 2 was observed to prepare medications, touch the surgical mask she was wearing with bare hands, no hand hygiene done after. LPN 2 moved the face shield and N-95 mask off the top of the binder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was properly labeled, oxygen and medication for respiratory complications were properly administered, or proper tracheostomy suction was provided for 5 of 7 residents at risk for respiratory complications. (Resident B, Resident 30, Resident 55, Resident 62, Resident 119) Findings include: 1. On 2/14/24 at 9:15 A.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Resident B was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Congestive Heart Failure, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. The most recent Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 1/12/24, indicated resident B had moderate cognitive impairment and was receiving oxygen. Current orders included, but were not limited to: Furosemide tablet; 40 mg (milligram) Take for SOB (shortness of breath) or lower extremity edema PRN (once a day), start date 1/6/24. The administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secure, labeled correctly, stored at proper temperatures, and the temperature monitor logs were complete in 3 of 3 medication carts observed. (B/D/E hall medication carts) Findings include: 1. On 2/16/24 at 9:30 A.M., the medication cart for B hall was observed with the narcotic box within the medication cart unlocked. 2. On 2/16/24 at 9:44 A.M., the medication cart for E hall was observed with the narcotic box within the medication cart unlocked. There was a box in the top drawer of the cart that contained an opened vial of Tubersol (used to test for tuberculosis) with an open date 11/8/93. Two loose pills were observed in the cart; a pink oval pill with 5 on one side and 894 on the other, and an orange round pill with 277 on one side. During an interview on 2/16/24 at 9:50 A.M., RN 4 indicated the narcotic boxes should be locked and the loose pills should not be in the cart and then disposed of the loose pills in a drug buster solution located in the medication room. RN 4 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was served at palatable temperatures for 1 of 1 trays tested for temperature. Finding includes: On 2/12/24 at 10:13 A.M., Resident 51 indicated she was one of the last residents to get served food and her breakfast was not always hot. On 2/12/24 at 10:56 A.M., Resident 15 indicated the food was occasionally cold when it arrived to her room. On 2/12/24 at 11:29 A.M., Resident 60 indicated she had an issue with the temperature of the food. On 2/12/24 at 11:29 A.M., Resident 17 indicated the food was not always hot when it arrived to his room. On 2/12/24 at 1:27 P.M., Resident 45 indicated the food was not hot when served. On 2/12/24 at 1:47 P.M., Resident 52 indicated that the food was occasionally cold when it arrived to his room. On 2/13/24 at 2:30 P.M., Resident 32 indicated the food didn't taste good and the temperatures weren't consistently palatable. On 2/15/24 at 12:56 P.M., a test tray was obtained from the C Hall. The following temperatures were observed and recorded: Baked beans - 112…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents that were self administering medications were assessed for capability to self administer medications for 2 of 2 residents observed with medications in their room. (Resident 32, Resident 30) Findings include: 1. On 2/15/24 at 10:15 A.M., QMA (Qualified Medication Aide) 7 was observed taking medication into Resident 32's room. QMA 7 left the medication cup with pills in it on the resident's bedside table without watching the resident take the medication. On 2/15/24 at 10:58 A.M., Resident 32's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, hyperlipidemia, and major depressive disorder. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 11/21/23, indicated Resident 32 was cognitively intact. The clinical record lacked an order or evaluation for self administration of medications. On 2/16/24 at 9:16 A.M., LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 14 indicated there weren't any residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment was completed accurately for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for MDS discrepancy. (Resident 32) Finding includes: On 2/15/24 at 10:58 A.M., Resident 32's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, acquired absence of right leg above knee, and generalized muscle weakness. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 11/21/23, indicated Resident 32 was cognitively intact, was dependent on 2 or more staff for transfers, and had no falls since the prior assessment on 8/21/23. Progress notes indicated Resident 32 sustained falls on 8/25/23, 8/26/23, 10/25/23, and 11/5/23. On 2/20/24 at 10:45 A.M. the Administrator indicated the 11/21/23 MDS quarterly assessment should be marked yes for falls for Resident 32 and was unsure why it had been marked no. At that time, she indicated the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive care plan interventions were implemented for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for urinary catheter care. (Resident 57) Findings include: On 2/12/24 at 2:54 P.M. Resident 57 was observed sitting near the front door. Resident 57's catheter bag was hanging from the back of the wheelchair. There was no protective pouch covering the bag. On 2/15/24 at 7:34 A.M. Resident 57 was observed in the hall with the catheter bag hanging on the armrest of the wheelchair above waist level. There was no protective pouch covering the bag. On 2/16/24 at 8:47 A.M., Resident 57 was observed in the hall with the catheter bag hanging on the armrest of the wheelchair above waist level. There was no protective pouch covering the bag. On 2/14/24 at 9:15 A.M., Resident 57's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 57's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment was completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a friction abrasion from occurring for 1 of 2 residents observed for facility acquired skin alterations. (Resident 29) Findings include: During an observation on 2/12/24 at 2:12 P.M., Resident 29's mattress was observed to have a deep impression, and the metal bar of the bed frame beneath the mattress could be felt through the dip in the mattress. The resident expressed the wound on her bottom had occurred multiple times as a result of transferring over the spot in the mattress where the bar was palpable. She indicated the staff were aware of the defective mattress and the pressure it was causing against her skin. A new or different mattress was not provided. No grab bar was observed on the left side of Resident 29's bed. On 2/14/24 at 8:27 A.M., Resident 29's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Resident 29's most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 1/2/24, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received supervision and consistent implementation of interventions to prevent falls for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents related to falls. Fall interventions were not consistently implemented, thorough assessments of post fall needs was lacking, and care plans were not updated following falls. (Resident 32, Resident 60) Findings include: 1. On 2/13/24 at 2:30 P.M., QMA 12 was observed transferring Resident 32 from a chair to his bed using a slide board and no gait belt. On 2/15/24 at 10:58 A.M., Resident 32's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 32 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, acquired absence of right leg above knee, and generalized muscle weakness. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 11/21/23, indicated Resident 32 was cognitively intact, was dependent on 2 or more staff for transfers, and had no falls since the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor for behaviors in 1 of 2 residents reviewed for resident to resident altercations. (Resident 37, Resident 3) Findings include: On 2/12/24 at 9:48 A.M., Resident 3 indicated there was another resident (Resident 37) who was verbally aggressive with him, followed him around, and bothered him during the one time verbal altercation. He indicated the other resident (Resident 37) made him feel scared at that time but feels nervous sometimes now when he sees him in the hallway. At that time of the altercation, he indicated that he had made staff aware. On 2/16/24 at 1:16 P.M., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, mild intellectual disability, generalized anxiety, and depression. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 1/12/24, indicated Resident 3 was cognitively intact and had no behaviors. A progress note on 1/30/2024 at 7:57 P.M. indicated Resident heard hollering at another resident in the smaller dining area. Per resident, another resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure routine medications were available and dispensed according to physician's orders for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 15) Finding includes: On 2/12/24 at 10:59 A.M., Resident 15 indicated that on the evening of 2/7/24 she started having uncontrollable tremors and couldn't breathe. At that time, she learned from a nurse that she was out of lorazepam. She indicated the nurse left the room to retrieve lorazepam out of the emergency drug kit (EDK), but never returned. She began screaming for someone to come back, and after about an hour of no one coming, she called 911 for help. An ambulance arrived at the facility and she was transported to the hospital where she was diagnosed and treated for withdrawal. The resident indicated during that time she felt the most lonely she had ever felt in life and wondered if she was going to die. On 2/16/24 at 8:28 A.M., Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, major depressive disorder and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices and standards were in 2 of 2 residents observed during care. Staff was observed not performing hand hygiene, changing gloves during care.( Resident 55, Resident 29) Findings include: 1. On 2/19/24 at 12:59 P.M., RN (Registered Nurse) 3 was observed during tracheostomy care on Resident 55. The following was the observation of the procedure: RN 3 did not wash hands after gloves were removed following the cleaning of the aerosol collar for the tracheostomy and the inner cannula. RN 3 placed sterile gloves on hands and handles the yankauer (suction tool) with both sterile hands. RN 3 did not wash hands prior to the application of clean gloves, before the trach stoma was cleaned with sterile water and Q-tip. RN 3 did not change gloves prior to the application of ointment on the 4 x 4 dressing around the stoma. RN 3 did not wash hands after the removal of soiled gloves and applying sterile gloves, before the changing of the inner cannula. 2. On 2/20/24 at 9:58 A.M., RN (Registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0659 — isolatedProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. A resident was not made NPO (Nothing by Mouth) before an ordered medical test. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 1/11/24 at 9:28 a.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, other specified diseases of liver-hepatic hilum mass, atrial fibrillation, rhabdomyolysis, unspecified dementia. A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident B's cognition was intact. Care plans were reviewed and included, but were not limited to, Resident requires assistance with ADL's (activities of daily living), including bed mobility, transfers, eating, and toileting related to .hepatic hilum mass . September and October 2023 physicians orders were reviewed and included, but were not limited to: September 2023: Appointment with [name] MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) date/time : 9/25/23 12:30 p.m. Location: [name] diagnostic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL's (activities of daily living), care to 3 of 3 resident's reviewed for bathing. Bathing was not provided to residents. ( Resident B, Resident E, Resident F ) Finding includes: 1. On 1/11/24 at 9:29 a.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia, other lack of coordination, unsteadiness on feet, other abnormalities of gait and mobility. A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set), assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident B's cognition was intact, shower/bathe self- partial/moderate assistance. Resident B no longer resided at the facility. Care plans were reviewed and included, but were not limited to: Resident requires assistance with ADL's (Activities of Daily Living), including bed mobility, transfers, eating and toileting related to: weakness, decreased mobility, impaired balance, incontinence , HX of falls, fall risk, atrial fibrillation, dementia, hepatic hilum mass, HTN,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 for 2 of 4 observations. Staff were observed to enter COVID- 19 positive resident rooms without the proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment). ( room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER] ) Findings included: On 12/14/23 at 8:29 a.m., LPN 1 was observed to have on a surgical mask and gown. LPN 1 was observed to don gloves and enter room [ROOM NUMBER]. LPN 1 did not have on a N95 or eye protection before entering the room. room [ROOM NUMBER] had an isolation sign on the door and a sign with instructions on how to don and doff PPE (Personal Protective Equipment). The isolation sign included, but was not limited to: Isolation -Droplet/Contact Precautions. In addition to standard precautions, staff and providers must : Hand hygiene: when entering and exiting and wear all PPE listed below: Gown, N95 Respirator, Eye Protection ( face shield or goggles), Gloves.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care was followed for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for residents receiving dialysis services. Physician orders were not followed and routine assessments were not completed for residents receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD). (Resident B, Resident C) Findings includes: 1. During record review on 9/5/23 at 11:000 A.M., a facility reported incident, dated 8/27/23, included that Resident B received PD treatment while the treatment was on hold. Resident B's diagnoses included but was not limited to end stage renal disease, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and with stage 5 chronic kidney disease. Resident B's most recent admission MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated, 8/13/23 , indicated the resident's cognition was moderately impaired and that they had not received dialysis treatments during the prior 7 day look back period. Resident B's physician orders included, but was not limited to; daily weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with ADL's received a shower for 7 of 9 residents reviewed. (Resident C, Resident F, Resident B, Resident D, Resident G, Resident J, Resident H) Findings include: 1. On 9/21/22 at 1:48 P.M., Resident C's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and osteoarthritis. The Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 5/21/22, indicated the resident required the extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and was dependent on staff for bathing. Resident C was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident C's care plan included, but was not limited to, resident will have ADL (Activities of Daily Living) needs med, initiated on 11/19/19. The interventions included, but were not limited to, morning and afternoon care including bathing. Resident C's bathing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff followed recipes for 4 of 4 pureed meals observed. Kitchen staff failed to measure ingredients in accordance with the recipes. Finding includes: During an observation on 9/22/22 at 11:31 A.M., Dietary Manager prepared 4 (four) pureed meals. The Dietary Manager indicated he was preparing lasagna, Caesar salad, garlic bread, and peaches. The recipe binder was set on the table, closed. The meals were prepared as follows: Lasagna- The Dietary Manager added 4 (four) 6 (six) ounce scoops of lasagna and an undetermined amount of beef broth to the food processor. At that time, the Dietary Manager indicated it was probably about 1 (one) teaspoon of beef broth that was added. Caesar Salad- The Dietary Manager added an unknown amount of lettuce and salad dressing in the food processor, and 4 packets of parmesan cheese. At that time, the Dietary Manager indicated it was about 4 ounces of lettuce and about 1/3 cup of salad dressing. Garlic Bread- The Dietary Manager added 1 cup of pureed bread mix to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-23 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Quarterly MDS (MDS) assessments were completed timely for 2 of 22 residents reviewed. (Resident C, Resident 23) Findings include: 1. During record review on 9/21/22 at 1:15 P.M., Resident C's most recent Quarterly MDS assessment due 8/21/22 was still in progress. The last completed MDS assessment was a Significant Change assessment completed 5/21/22. 2. During record review on 9/23/22 at 10:40 A.M., Resident 23's most recent Quarterly MDS assessment due 9/14/22 was still in progress. Resident 23's last completed MDS assessment was a Significant Change assessment completed 6/14/22. During an interview on 9/23/22 at 11:32 A.M., the MDS Coordinator indicated they were new to the position and were trying to get caught up on the late assessments and that assessments should be completed every 3 months or during a significant change. On 9/23/22 at 11:50 A.M., the DON (Director of Nursing) supplied a facility policy titled, Resident Assessment (RAI) OBRA Required Assessments, dated 8/2019. The policy included, It is the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the plan of care for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pain and 1 of 4 residents reviewed for falls. A resident didn't receive a topical pain relieving gel as ordered by the physician and a resident's fall interventions were not in place. (Resident 49, Resident G) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 9/20/22 at 11:04 A.M., Resident 49 was lying in bed. A tube of ointment was lying on the bedside table next to the resident. Resident 49 indicated the tube on the bedside table was her Voltaren Gel (topical pain relieving gel), and that staff did not routinely apply the gel. Resident 49 indicated she had knee pain. During record review on 9/23/22 at 8:49 A.M., Resident 49's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, peripheral vascular disease, polyneuropathy, pain in right shoulder, and pain in left shoulder. Resident 49's most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated , 7/24/22, indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment and received scheduled pain medications. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care conferences with residents and family members were held at least quarterly for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for participation in care planning conferences. (Resident F, Resident 50, Resident 19, Resident 21) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 9/20/22 at 9:45 A.M., Resident F indicated they had not recently had a care planning conference. During record review on 9/22/22 at 12:00 P.M., Resident F's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety and dementia. Resident F's most recent Significant Change MDS (Minimal Data Set) assessment, dated 7/26/22, indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment. During an interview on 9/23/22 at 12:29 P.M., the Social Service Director (SSD) indicated Resident F had been scheduled to have a care planning conference and that their last care planning conference was held on 4/26/22. 2. During an interview on 9/19/22 at 12:50 P.M., Resident 50 indicated they had not had a care planning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 11) Finding includes: On 9/19/22 at 9:24 A.M., an empty box of cigarettes was observed lying on the resident's bed with a yellow lighter in it. On 9/22/22 at 9:52 A.M., 2 (two) cigarettes that had been lit and put out were observed in Resident 11's room. One on the bedside table and another one on the resident's nightstand. The room also smelled like smoke. During record review on 9/21/22 at 1:27 P.M., Resident 11's most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/21/22, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident 11's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, psychotic disorder (not schizophrenia), unspecified intellectual disabilities, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, and nicotine dependence. Resident 11's care plan included, but was not limited to, resident chooses to smoke (initiated on 3/18/22). It indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A resident received an antipsychotic medication every evening without having an adequate indication for its use. (Resident 19) Finding includes: During record review on 9/22/22 at 1:59 P.M., Resident 19's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance. Resident 19's most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/28/22, indicated Resident 19 received antipsychotics on a routine basis. Resident 19's current physician orders included, but were not limited to, Seroquel (quetiapine) (antipsychotic medication) 25 milligrams (mg) oral at bedtime for a diagnosis of unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance. During an interview on 9/23/22 at 2:14 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated that Resident 19 was admitted with the antipsychotic order and she does not have an appropriate diagnosis for the order. On 9/23/22 at 2:15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices and standards were maintained for 1 of 7 residents observed during medication pass, 1 of 6 resident rooms on contact/droplet isolation precautions, and during 1 random observation. Staff was observed entering an isolation room with an N95 over the surgical mask, staff handled medications with their bare hands, and staff was observed eating in the hall without a mask on within arms length of a resident. (CNA 3, CNA 4, LPN 5, Resident 109, Resident 11) Findings include: 1. On 9/20/22 at 11:06 A.M., LPN 5 popped two tablets out of medication cards into his bare hand and then placed the tablets into a medication cup. LPN 5 then administered the medications to Resident 109. 2. On 9/21/22 at 7:41 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 3 entered a resident room on contact/droplet precautions and placed an N95 mask over her surgical mask. CNA 3 then exited the room wearing a gown, gloves, faceshield, N95 over the surgical mask, and proceeded to put the gown and gloves in a clear bag…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-23 · tag F0888 — isolatedEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all staff received the COVID-19 vaccination and failed to follow the facility's contingency plan for 1 of 1 partially vaccinated staff. (Staff 2) Finding includes: On 9/21/22 at 8:34 A.M., Staff 2's COVID-19 vaccination status was reviewed. Staff 2 was elgible for the second dose of a 2 (two) dose Covid-19 vaccination on 6/19/22. During an interview on 9/21/22 at 12:24 P.M, the Infection Preventionist (IP) indicated Staff 2 was currently working on getting a medical exemption. On 9/22/22 at 10:18 A.M., Staff 2's work schedule was reviewed. Staff 2 was actively working with residents in the facility. On 9/21/22 at 10:20 A.M., a current COVID-19 Employee Vaccination Requirement, dated July 8, 2022, was provided and indicated All Current Employees, unless granted an exemption must, receive vaccines as per that below: .Received all shot doses .to be considered fully vaccinated by March 15, 2022 in order to meet the vaccine requirement .Please note that employees who are unvaccinated and whom do not have an approved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-02-21 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurately completed staff sheets were posted daily for 8 of 8 days during the survey. (2/12,2/13,2/14, 2/15, 2/16, 2/19,2/20,2/21) Findings include: On 2/12/24 at 8:48 A.M., a staffing sheet was observed sitting on a table across next to the receptionist desk. The sheet included but was not limited to the following information: Shift hours for RN (Registered Nurse), LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) and CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). Total number of RN, LPN, and CNA for each shift Total hours of RN, LPN, and CNA for each shift The sheet lacked specific hours worked when the discipline does not work a full 12 hour shift denitrified on the form (7 A.M. to 7 P.M. and 7 P.M. to 7 A.M.). On 2/13/24 at 8:00 A.M., a staffing sheet was observed sitting on a table across next to the receptionist desk. The sheet included but was not limited to the following information: Shift hours for RN, LPN, and CNA. Total number of RN, LPN, and CNA for each shift Total hours of RN, LPN, and CNA for each shift The sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2022-09-23 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurately completed staffing sheets were posted daily for 5 of 5 days during the survey. Finding includes: During a review of the posted nurse staffing sheets on 9/23/22 at 12:00 P.M., the posted nurse staffing sheets indicated total hours worked by nursing staff, but lacked specific hours for the following days during the survey period: September 19, 2022 September 20, 2022 September 21, 2022 September 22, 2022 September 23, 2022 During an interview on 9/23/22 at 9:27 A.M., the Administrator indicated the correct form was behind the incorrect form, but was not visible for residents or guests to view. On 9/23/22 at 10:11 A.M., a current Posted Nurse Staffing Data and Retention Requirements policy, dated 7/2019, was provided and indicated The facility must post the following information at the beginning of each shift .The total number and actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: Registered nurses, Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 89 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 89; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DRUMMER, CARL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2017 |
| HANIFY, THOMAS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2022 |
| HORN, BRENDA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 12/01/2023 |
| LAZARD, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/29/2021 |
| MANTRAVADI, GEETA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 07/21/2021 |
| PAYNE, MONICA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 08/09/2021 |
| BABCOCK, PAUL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/30/2020 |
| CAINE, VIRGINIA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/10/1994 |
| HARRIS, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/22/2003 |
| AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/15/2026 |
| CARR, WILLIAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/06/2026 |
| DEBES, AMBER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/14/2024 |
| DICE, MARK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2023 |
| HAYES, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/15/2026 |
| VAN CAMP, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $661K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155328. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.