Stonebrooke Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 30.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 69.1 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.85 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.48 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from mental abuse by a staff member obtaining a photograph of the resident's genitalia without the resident's permission and showing other staff members resulting in unauthorized photographs taken for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) Using the reasonable person concept, it is likely this would lead to humiliation, confusion, anxiety, and embarrassment for Resident B. Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/12/26 at 10:26 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, morbid (severe) obesity, Alzheimer's disease (progressive, irreversible brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills) with late onset, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. A physician's order, dated, 2/3/26, indicated Resident B had Dakin's Solution (a diluted hospital-grade bleach formula used as an antiseptic to cleanse wounds) with special instructions to cleanse scrotal abscess with NS (Normal Saline), pat dry, pack open area with Dakin's Solution, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of mental abuse of a resident by a staff member taking a picture of the resident's genitalia in a timely manner to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) Finding include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/12/26 at 10:34 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, muscle weakness, Alzheimer's disease (progressive, irreversible brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills) with late onset, and anxiety. A facility reported incident, dated 2/8/26 at 8:55 a.m., indicated a staff member took unauthorized photo of resident. A phone interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2, dated 2/8/26 at 10:23 a.m., indicated she did take a picture of Resident B's wound earlier in the week of 2/2/26. CNA 2 indicated she was unsure what day she took the picture or what nurse she showed it to and was unsure if she had shown any other staff members as well. During an interview with Qualified Medical Assistant (QMA)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dignified incontinent care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident D). Finding include:During an interview with Resident D on 10/22/25 at 1:00 p.m., the resident indicated the facility staff treated her with dignity except CNA 3. CNA 3 was rough during incontinence care and it made her sore. The resident had told CNA 3 to go easy and he would say ok, but did not. CNA 3 was rushing with care and the resident felt it was disrespectful to her. Resident D indicated other than CNA 3 rushing, he was a good guy. The resident had reported this to a nurse and some of the other CNA's about Resident 3 being rough and rushing during care, but did not know their name. The staff have not fill out a grievance for her related to this matter. Review of the clinical record of Resident D on 10/23/25 at 11:31 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute and chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free of verbal abuse for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident C and Resident F). Findings include:1. During an interview with Resident C on 10/22/25 at 1:05 p.m., they indicated Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 9 had come onto shift one morning to assist CNA 2 with incontinence care. Resident C indicated CNA 9 was upset with her upon entering the room and asked rudely, didn't they change you already?, and indicated she apologized for being wet and she couldn't control her bladder and CNA 9 kept saying hush it and using hand gestures for her to shut her mouth when she was trying to speak. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 10/22/25 at 1:45 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, lymphedema (swelling in the body's tissues due to blockage in the lymphatic system), hypertensive heart disease, and post-traumatic stress disorder. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/25/25, indicated Resident C was cognitively intact, dependent with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely report an incident of alleged verbal abuse to the Executive Director for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for reporting abuse. (Resident C) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 10/22/25 at 1:45 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic pain syndrome, major depressive disorder, and hypertension.The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/25/25, indicated Resident C was cognitively intact.During an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 on 10/23/25 at 11:30 a.m., they indicated Resident C was upset and tearful on 10/15/25 after receiving incontinent care from CNA 9. CNA 2 indicated CNA 9 had hushed Resident C when she was apologizing for being wet, making hand gestures for her to shut her mouth and stop talking, and throwing dirty linens on the floor and saying in front of Resident C, great, now I'm covered in piss. CNA 2 indicated she wrote out a statement of the incident and placed it under every director's door the night of 10/15/25, so they received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers as preferred for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). (Resident B and Resident E) Findings include: 1. During an interview with Resident E's daughter on 5/14/25 at 1:00 p.m., she indicated she did not think her mother was receiving her showers as regularly as she preferred. The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 5/16/25 at 9:42 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, chronic kidney disease, repeated falls, and chronic pain syndrome. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/17/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision making. The resident was dependent on the staff for showering. The plan of care for Resident E, dated 4/4/25, indicated the resident required assistance with ADLs related to a mobility deficit, recent right hip fracture, and dementia. The interventions included, but were not limited to, assistance with bathing as needed per resident preference and to offer showers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a chair cushion was in place for a resident with stage 2 pressure ulcers (partial thickness skin loss) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident E) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 5/16/25 at 9:42 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, repeated falls, and chronic pain syndrome. During an observation on 5/14/25 at 1:25 p.m., Resident E had a chair cushion laying on the floor beside a chair. An interview with Resident E's daughter at that time indicated she had soiled the cushion the day before. So, the staff took the cover off for washing and put the cushion on the floor. During an observation on 5/15/25 at 10:26 a.m., Resident E was sitting in a wheelchair with no cushion in the seat. The cushion was lying on the floor beside a chair. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/17/25, indicated Resident E was severely cognitively impaired, was at risk for pressure ulcers, and used a pressure reducing device for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was weighed, as ordered, and a resident was provided with an adaptive drinking device, as ordered, for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 50 and Resident 59) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 59 was reviewed on 5/15/25 at 12:39 p.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis and malnutrition. He was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The 5/6/25 ADL (activities of daily living) care plan indicated he required assistance with eating with an intervention to assist with eating and drinking, as needed. The vitals section of the clinical record indicated a weight of 100 pounds and a BMI (body mass index) of 16.64 (less than 18.5 was considered underweight) on 5/5/25. The 5/5/25 Malnutrition Criteria assessment indicated he met the criteria for malnutrition. The physician's orders indicated, Regular, Honey Thick/Moderately Thick, Pureed, Special Instructions:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions when residents were kissing in the common area on the memory care unit for 1 of 1 observation of behaviors (Resident 35 and Resident 53). Findings include: During an observation on 5/14/25 at 1:22 p.m., Resident 35 was sitting at a dining room table when Resident 53 bent down and kissed Resident 35 on the lips. This was reported to Registered Nurse (RN) 7. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 6 attempted to separate the residents and was unable to. Resident 35 and Resident 53 were holding hands, going up and down the hallway, and into their shared bedroom with the door shut unsupervised. CNA 6 indicated she attempted to separate them, but they were roommates and there was nothing she could do. CNA 6 indicated the residents were care planned for behaviors, but she was unsure what the interventions were. RN 7 was unsure what the interventions were and was looking them up on the computer. The Memory Care Coordinator indicated she had not seen this behavior of them kissing before and only previously…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control measures were maintained during incontinence care for 1 of 1 resident observed for pressure ulcers. (Resident E) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 5/16/25 at 9:42 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, repeated falls, and chronic pain syndrome. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/17/25, indicated Resident E was severely cognitively impaired, was at risk for pressure ulcers, and was dependent on staff for toileting needs. During an observation of Resident E on 5/16/25 at 9:51 a.m., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 2 and CNA 3 entered Resident E's room to clean her up after being incontinent of bowel and bladder while lying in bed. CNA 2 and CNA 3 both donned gowns and gloves due to the resident being in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to wounds on the right and left buttock and labia. CNA 3 was cleaning Resident E's peri-area (area between the anus and the genitals) with a soapy wet washcloth. Each…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to routinely document the meal intakes for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident assessment. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record of Resident B was reviewed on 4-9-25 at 10:55 a.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia, heart failure and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Her most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, a significant change assessment, dated 2-18-25, indicated she was severely cognitively impaired, required supervision or touching assistance for meal consumption, had been identified for weight loss within the last six months, and received a therapeutic and mechanically altered diet. In an interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 4 on 4-9-25 at 12:35 p.m., she indicated Resident B had a big decline in eating and drinking abilities, prior to being sent out to an area hospital on 3-11-25. In an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 4-9-25 at 12:45 p.m., she indicated in the weeks prior to Resident B being sent out to an area hospital, one of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN