No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

North Capitol Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

2010 N Capitol Ave, Indianapolis, IN 46202 · For profit - Corporation · 123 certified beds · (317) 924-5821 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (317) 924-5821 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Jan 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jan 2026
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1815 N Capitol Ave · (317) 925-7795 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1801 N. Senate Ave. · (317) 962-5606 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.8 mi
524 E 16th St · (317) 923-6858 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2334 N Capitol AVE · (317) 327-7275 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.5%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.8%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms26.2%25.2%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.6%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.8%23.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.1%3.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.2%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.8%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.1%79.0%79.4%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified65.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
1.19
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.47
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.27
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
45.1%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 67.9 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.53 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-30)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-03)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to irrigate (flush) a urinary catheter, as ordered by the physician, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident D).Findings include: The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 5/7/26 at 10:10 a.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, obstructive and reflux uropathy (urine cannot drain through the urinary tract). A care plan, last reviewed 3/11/26, indicated Resident D required an indwelling urinary catheter related to obstructive uropathy. The goal was that catheter care would be managed appropriately. The interventions included avoid obstruction in the drainage of the catheter and provide assistance for catheter care.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, completed 3/18/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and had an indwelling urinary catheter. A physician's order, dated 4/24/2026, indicated Resident D was to receive Clorpactin WCS-90 (antimicrobial solution) 60 milliliter (ml) instilled into the bladder through the indwelling catheter. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to be free from misappropriation of their narcotic medication for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for misappropriation. (Residents C, D, E, and F)Findings include:1.An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) on 1/28/26 at 10:59 a.m. The DNS indicated there were about thirty fentanyl patches unaccounted for. At 3:30 p.m., the DNS indicated the Fentanyl/Duragesic Controlled Substance Record logs should have been completed by the nurse who removed the old fentanyl patch and applied the new fentanyl patch every 72 hours. It should have been the same nurse for removal as for new application, and a different nurse for the witnessed entries. The logs didn't make any sense, because Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4 documented as the witness to Register Nurse (RN) 2's application, but they didn't even work the same shift. Once each log was completed, it was supposed to be filed and uploaded into the residents' electronic clinical record. There were multiple logs that were missing. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    F697Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents' pain medication, as ordered, and to verify placement of residents' fentanyl patches, as ordered, for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for pain management. (Residents C, D, E, and F)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 1/28/26 at 2:33 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to: chronic pain. The at risk for pain care plan, revised 1/19/26, indicated the resident was non-verbal and staff must anticipate her needs. Staff were to assess for non-verbal indicators of pain and provide intervention, as ordered. An approach was to administer her medications, as ordered, starting 3/17/22. The physician's orders indicated to apply a 72-hour fentanyl patch (75 mcg/hour) every three days, starting 6/8/24 and ending 9/29/25. The August, 2025 medication administration record (MAR) indicated the fentanyl patch was not applied on 8/20/25, because the medication was unavailable. The current physician's order, starting 2/19/23, indicated to verify placement of the fentanyl…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement pharmaceutical procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of narcotic medication; to ensure medication records were in order; and ensure that an account of all controlled medications was maintained and periodically reconciled for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for pain management. (Residents C, D, E, and F)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 1/28/26 at 1:56 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to: chronic pain. An interview was conducted with the Clinical Director of Resident F's hospice company on 1/29/26 at 12:49 p.m. She indicated she was the supervisor of the hospice nurse who first discovered the fentanyl patch issue at the end of September, 2025 at the facility. Resident F had just been admitted to hospice. Resident F was due for her fentanyl patch to be changed, and the hospice nurse asked the facility staff to apply one, but there were no fentanyl patches available for application. It didn't make sense,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-15 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a staff member did not initiate chest compressions to a hospice resident that had an advanced directive in place Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) code status. (Resident B)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on [DATE] at 9:45 a.m. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to: Alzheimer's disease. An Indiana Physician Orders Scope of Treatment (POST), dated [DATE], indicated Resident B had a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) advanced directive. A care plan, dated [DATE], indicated Resident B had an advanced directive in place, DNR. A care plan, dated [DATE], indicated Resident B has difficulty making self understood not able to communicate. A care plan, dated [DATE], indicated Resident B received hospice services related to Alzheimer's disease. A physician's order, dated [DATE], indicated Resident B's code status was DNR. An event, dated [DATE], indicated Resident B had an unwitnessed fall. The resident was found having…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during medication administration and failed to ensure that indwelling catheter tubing and drainage bag were kept off a fall mat and the floor for 6 of 8 residents reviewed for medication administration and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheter. (Residents' 5, 12, 26, 34, 40, 50, and 72) Findings include: 1a. The clinical record for Resident 26 was reviewed on 7/24/25 at 9:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, paranoid schizophrenia. An observation was conducted of a medication administration for Resident 26 with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 on 7/29/25 at 8:31 a.m. LPN 2 was observed obtaining the resident's blood pressure by utilizing a Dinamap (an electronic device for blood pressure monitoring). She then went to the medication cart and prepped for the resident's medication for administration. During that time, she was observed touching her hair, eye glasses, the computer mouse, keys, medication cards, medication cups, water pitcher and drinking cups.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a call light system and ceilings and walls in residents' rooms were in good repair for 7 of 7 residents reviewed for environment, and to provide a home-like environment in the memory care unit common area with the potential to effect 19 of 19 residents. (Residents 1, 2, 15, 31, 34, 35, and E)Findings include: 1. On 7/24/25 at 11:02 a.m., the walls in Resident E's room were observed to have scrapes with paint missing, as well as chipping in the baseboards. 2. On 7/24/25 at 11:32 a.m. a random observation was conducted of exposed wiring from a call light cord coming out of the wall in Resident 31's room.3. On 7/24/25 at 1:36 p.m. an observation was conducted of gouges in the walls and baseboards of Resident 35's room. During this observation, Resident 35 indicated the walls had been like that for a year and he would like it to be fixed. 4. On 7/24/25 at 1:42 p.m. a random observation was conducted of gouges on a wall and a missing baseboard in Resident 34's room.5. On 7/25/25 at 10:27 a.m., the walls in Resident 2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely coordinate care with hospice for scheduled pain medication and failed to administer medication as ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospice and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 11 and Resident D) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 11 was reviewed on 7/23/25 at 2:14 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, senile degeneration of the brain and generalized arthritis. A care plan, initiated 4/8/25, indicated Resident 11 required hospice services related to his diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The goal was for him to experience death with dignity and physical comfort. The interventions included, but were not limited to, administer pain medications as ordered and notify physician and hospice of unrelieved or worsening pain and for the hospice licensed nurse to visit two times weekly to obtain vital signs and provide medication management. A Hospice Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Report,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer gastric tube feeding as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for gastric tube feeding (Resident 5). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 7/25/25 at 10:17 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, epilepsy and gastrostomy (g-tube) status. A physician's order, dated 4/21/25, indicated she was to receive Glucerna 1.5 (type of nutritional formula) at 50 milliliters (mLs) an hour with 45 mLs of water flushes per hour. A care plan, last edited 7/3/25, indicated Resident 5 was at nutritional risk related to dependency on enteral nutrition (nutrition via gastric tube) for nutritional needs. The goal was for her to maintain her weight without significant weight changes. The interventions included, but were not limited to, provided enteral feedings as ordered by the physician. On 7/25/25 at 10:17 a.m., Resident 5 was observed lying in her bed. Her gastric tube (g-tube) feeding pump was running at 55 mLs per hour. On 7/28/25 at 2:37 p.m., Resident 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident with intrusive wandering, document new behavior events in the clinical record, and timely update the plan of care with new interventions for behaviors for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dementia care (Resident K and Resident 61). Findings include: 1a. The clinical record for Resident K was reviewed on 7/23/25 at 11:15 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behavioral disturbances, anxiety, and traumatic brain injury. He was readmitted to the facility, on 7/16/25, following an extended hospital stay. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 6/6/25, indicated he rarely/never made himself understood and sometimes understood what was said to him. He had short-term and long-term memory problems and severely impaired decision-making skills. He had displayed inattention. He displayed physical behaviors, such as hitting, kicking, scratching or pushing one to three times in the seven day look back period. He had displayed wandering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely identify and obtain physician's orders for a surgical wound that was present upon admission to the facility for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for wounds (Resident B). Findings include: The clinical record for resident B was reviewed on 2/6/25 at 11:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anal abscess (swollen area within body tissue, containing an accumulation of pus) and colostomy (colon was diverted to an artificial opening in the abdominal wall). She was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An admission assessment, dated 1/13/25 at 8:04 p.m., indicated she had a wound on her right buttock which was 28 centimeters (cm) in length and 13 cm in width. The depth of the wound was eight cm. There were no other wounds identified on the admission assessment. A Nursing Progress Note, dated 1/13/25 at 9:54 p.m., indicated .This writer notified [name of hospital that discharged resident] . regarding treatment orders for resident .unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required follow-up care with an Ears, Nose, and Throat (ENT) physician was provided transportation to those appointments 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident C) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 9/24/24 at 1:23 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, malignant neoplasm of oropharynx (a type of head and neck cancer that starts in the middle part of the throat), tongue cancer, laryngectomy (removal of part or all the voice box), glossectomy (removal of part or all the tongue) and hydrocephalus (a buildup of extra fluid within the brain). A list of Resident C's appointments for the last six months was provided by Executive Director (ED) on 9/24/24 at 11:09 a.m. The list indicated in the last six months the resident had appointments on 4/5/24, 4/16/24, and 6/27/24. The resident required transportation to appointments and to be accompanied by a Respiratory Therapist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's safety when using a mechanical sling lift by a staff member not securing the sling clip to the peg on the mechanical lift and causing a resident to fall to the floor for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident K) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident K was reviewed on 9/26/24 at 10:21 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy (a congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture), muscular dystrophy (a group of genetic diseases that cause progressive weakness and loss of muscle mass), and contractures (a permanent or temporary shortening of muscles, tendons, skin, and other soft tissues that causes joints to stiffen and limit movement). A Physical Therapy Evaluation, dated 5/20/24, indicated Resident K required a mechanical lift for transfers. A nursing note, dated 9/23/24 at 9:49 a.m., indicated the nurse was alerted by a certified nursing assistant (CNA) that Resident K fell. The resident was lying on the floor in the entry to his room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store foods in the kitchen. This affected of 60 residents in the facility who eat food from the kitchen. Findings include: An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 5/28/24 at 10:11 a.m. with Registered Dietician (RD). During the initial tour the following was observed: In the walk-in fridge: - On a shelf in the fridge was a metal pan which contained a package of meat. RD indicated, at the time of the observation, the meat in the pan was thawing and should have been labeled with the kind of meat it was and a date indicating when it was taken out of the freezer to ensure its use within 72 hours of thawing. - Two unopened half gallons of lactose free milk where found to be expired. The expiration dates on the containers of lactose free milk were May 12, 2024 and May 11, 2024 respectively. - Sitting on the floor of the fridge in a milk crate were two unopened gallon jugs of milk. According to the RD at the time of the observation, no food items should be stored on the floor of the fridge. - On a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, homelike environment related to splintered chair rails behind beds; scrapped walls with exposed drywall; phone [NAME] with exposed wires; not ensuring wheel chairs were clean; not assuring feeding pump poles were clean; bed linens, towels, and washcloths with stains; bedroom furniture on the vent unit with missing and scratched veneer; and floors with loose and missing tiles for 10 of 15 residents reviewed for environment (Resident D, 21, 24, 27, 28, 30, 36, 44, 53 and 55). Findings include: 1. On 5/28/24 at 10:28 a.m., Resident 44's room was observed. The chair rail behind his bed was splintered and broken. 2. On 5/28/24 at 10:21 a.m., Resident 36's room was observed. The wall by the sink was chipped and drywall was exposed. The chair rail behind his bed was broken and splintered. The telephone jack was pulled from the wall with wires exposed. 3. On 5/28/24 at 10:36 a.m., Resident 27's room was observed. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have the Interdisciplinary team (IDT) determine and document a self medication assessment was clinically appropriate for 1 of 1 residents randomly observed with medications by their side in a common area. (Resident 18) Findings include: A random observation of Resident 18 was made on 5/28/24 at 11:12 a.m. Resident 18 was sitting in the common area/lounge on the second floor and on a table beside her was a medication cup with pills in it. The cup had several unidentified medication tablets in it. Resident 18 indicated, she questioned the number of medications in the cup and did not want to take medications without knowing what she was given. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN 22) conducted on 5/28/24 at 11:17 a.m. indicated, she had given Resident 22 her morning medications and believed she had placed them in her mouth prior to leaving the resident. LPN 22 indicated, Resident 18 must have spit them out back into the cup after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dependent residents with oral care, complete bed bath, hair care, and emptying of a bedside commode for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). (Resident D, Resident E, and Resident F) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 5/31/24 at 3:05 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and muscle weakness. A care plan for skin integrity, dated 5/21/24, indicated Resident D had impaired skin integrity. He was on bedrest, limited in his ability to change positions, and a problem for shear and friction related to required maximum assistance with bed mobility. A physician order, dated 5/17/24, indicated to perform oral care three times a day. An observation conducted of Resident D, on 5/29/24 at 9:56 a.m., of a white coated substance to his tongue. An observation conducted of Resident D, on 5/29/24 at 10:43 a.m., of a white coated substance to his tongue. An observation conducted of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a low air loss mattress was functioning for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident D and Resident 45) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 5/31/24 at 3:05 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and muscle weakness. A care plan for skin integrity, dated 5/21/24, indicated Resident D had impaired skin integrity. He was on bedrest, limited in his ability to change positions, and a problem for shear and friction related to required maximum assistance with bed mobility. An approach was listed to utilize a pressure reducing/redistribution mattress on the bed/low air loss (LAL) mattress. An observation conducted of Resident D, on 5/29/24 at 9:56 a.m., laying on a mattress with a pump to the foot board. There were no lights on the pump to indicate it was on and functioning. An observation conducted of Resident D,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure flooring was in good condition to prevent accident hazards for a resident that had tripped on loose flooring and had fallen for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident E) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 5/31/24 at 10:31 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy status, dependence on ventilator, muscle weakness, morbid obesity, and diabetes mellitus. An ADL care plan, dated 8/4/22, indicated Resident E required assistance with ADLs including bed mobility, transfers, and toileting related to chronic respiratory failure, anxiety disorder, depression, and debility. An approach was listed to assist with toileting and/or incontinence care as needed. A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/4/24, indicated Resident E was cognitively intact, needed substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene and personal hygiene, and supervision/touching assistance with toilet transfer. An interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained during incontinence care and ensure follow-up regarding changes in urinary output from an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheter. (Resident F) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 5/31/24 at 10:03 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus, obesity, tracheostomy status, gastrostomy status, dependence on ventilator, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. An admission MDS assessment, dated 4/1/24, indicated Resident F was dependent for ADLs, totally incontinent of bowel, and had an indwelling catheter. An ADL care plan, dated 3/28/24, indicated Resident F required assistance with ADLs including bed mobility, transfers, eating, and toileting related to mobility deficits, respiratory failure, obesity, ventilator status, and muscle weakness. The approach listed to assist with bathing as needed, assist with bed mobility as needed, and assist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident with a tracheostomy (trach) after providing trach care for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for death; ensure infection control practices were maintained during tracheostomy care (Resident D), and oxygen tubing/tracheostomy mask were changed as ordered (Resident E) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 60) Findings include: 1. An observation was conducted of tracheostomy (trach) care for Resident D, on 5/30/24 at 11:45 a.m., by Respiratory Therapist (RT) 4 and RT 5. The bedside table was noted with a tracheostomy kit that was unopened. RT 4 and RT 5 donned personal protective equipment (PPE) that included clean gloves, gown, and a facemask. RT 5 removed the inner cannula with his clean gloves and discarded of such in the trash can. RT 4 prepared to suction Resident D. RT 4 connected the suction catheter to the suction machine and proceeded to suction Resident D. Resident D started to cough and coughed up large amounts of mucous after being suctioned. Mucous was noted within…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely obtain laboratory tests, as ordered by the physician, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 5). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 5/29/24 at 11:10 a.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, diabetes, hypertension, and epilepsy. A care plan, initiated 10/29/18, indicated Resident 5 had ineffective tissue perfusion related to his diagnosis of hypertension, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), and history of stroke. The goal was for him to maintain adequate tissue perfusion as evidenced by blood pressure within normal limits for resident, no change in mental status, no complaints of dizziness/lightheadedness/syncope, and no edema. The interventions included, but were not limited to, obtain labs as ordered, initiated 10/29/18, and administer medications as ordered by the physician, initiated 10/29/18. A physician's order, dated 3/28/24, indicated he was to have a CBC (complete blood count) with differential, CMP (complete metabolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained during medication administration, while providing a bed bath (Resident F), and ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was available to utilize prior to entering a room on transmission-based precautions (TBP) (Residents' 6, 21, 22, 41 and 56). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 5/31/24 at 10:03 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus, obesity, tracheostomy status, gastrostomy status, and dependence on ventilator. An admission MDS assessment, dated 4/1/24, indicated Resident F was dependent for ADLs, totally incontinent of bowel, and an indwelling catheter. An ADL care plan, dated 3/28/24, indicated Resident F required assistance with ADLs including bed mobility, transfers, eating, and toileting related to mobility deficits, respiratory failure, obesity, ventilator status, and muscle weakness. The approach listed to assist with bathing as needed, assist with bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0914 — isolated
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy curtains were present rooms shared by two resident for 4 of 15 residents reviewed for environment (Resident 14, 36, 43, and 53). Findings include: 1a. The clinical record for Resident 14 was reviewed on 5/31/24 at 11:30 a.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hypertension. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, completed 3/4/24, indicated he was cognitively intact. 1b. The clinical record for Resident 36 was reviewed on 5/28/24 at 10:21 a.m. On 6/3/24 at 11:20 a.m., Resident 14 and Resident 36's room was observed with the ED (Executive Director). There was no privacy curtain present between the residents' beds. During an interview on 6/3/24 at 11:20 a.m., Resident 14 indicated the privacy curtain had been missing for quite a while. 2a. The clinical record for Resident 43 was reviewed on 5/29/24 at 11:32 a.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, anoxic brain injury. 2b. The clinical record for Resident 53 was reviewed on 5/29/24 at 10:04 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program that included the elimination of clutter and debris for an area with a history of pest activity. This had the potential to affect 55 of 68 residents that reside in the facility. (Memory Care Unit and 200 Hallway) Findings include: An interview was conducted on 8/15/23 at 11:00 a.m., with Manager 2, who worked with the pest control company. He indicated there had been ongoing treatment for American cockroaches in the facility. The goal had been to conduct preventative measures and treat for such pests. There had been a concern with residents hoarding items to create clutter within their rooms. That can cause a barrier with treatment and not allow proper treatment to such area due to the clutter. An interview conducted with Resident B, on 8/15/23 at 12:00 p.m., indicated he had noticed cockroaches in his room and the 200-hallway on occasion. An interview conducted with Resident C, on 8/15/23 at 12:20 p.m., indicated she will see cockroaches, on occasion, in the common…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a functional and sanitary environment by not assuring the resident rooms were routinely dusted for 3 of 3 residents observed for environment (Resident 54, 56, and 66), and that the kitchen floor was in good repair with the potential to affect 60 of 69 residents who reside at the facility. Findings include: 1 a. The clinical record for Resident 66 was reviewed on 3/1/23 at 10:52 a.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure. On 3/2/23 at 1:22 p.m., Resident 66's room was observed. There was a purple fan on the windowsill. The fan grid had a large amount of dust present on the inside of the grid and there were pieces of dust, attached to the grid, which were moving being blown by the wind from the fan. On 3/3/23 at 1:30 p.m., Resident 66's room was observed. The purple fan was on the windowsill and continued to have a large amount of dust present on the inside of the grid. 1 b. The clinical record for Resident 56 was reviewed on 3/6/23 at 9:45 a.m. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was invited to participate in interdisciplinary care plan meetings for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for care planning (Resident 38). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 38 was reviewed on 3/1/23 at 2:54 p.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure and hypertension. A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, completed 1/18/23, indicated she was cognitively intact. During an interview on 3/1/23 at 2:54 p.m., Resident 38 indicated she had not attended an interdisciplinary care plan meeting for over a year. The clinical record did not contain any interdisciplinary care plan notes for the last 6 months. During an interview on 3/7/23 at 12:08 p.m., CS (Corporate Support) 1 indicated there were no care plan meeting notes present for Resident 38 for the last 6 months and that there was not documentation that she had been invited to care plan meeting during that time frame. On 3/7/23 at 12:36 p.m., the Executive Director provided the IDT…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities provided in the memory care unit was engaging to a cognitive impaired resident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for activities in the memory care unit. (Resident G) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident G was reviewed on 3/1/23 at 11:00 a.m. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dementia. A Quarterly 10/24/22 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated Resident G was severely cognitively impaired. An activities care plan for Resident G dated 2/10/23 indicated .Resident enjoys the following activities: watching movies with pop corn (classics), listening to music, playing board and card games, patio time, and socializing, family visit. Goals. Resident will participate in the daily cottage programming .Approach . Encourage resident to participate in activities he enjoys, such as watching TV (classics) listening to music, playing board and card games, patio time, and socializing . An observation was made of activities in the memory care unit dining room on 3/1/23 at 11:13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident's supplement, as ordered, to 1 of 1 resident reviewed for nutrition (Resident 61) and to administer medications as ordered for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident G) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 61 was reviewed on 3/1/23 at 11:00 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to: depression, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, and dementia. He admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The vitals section of the electronic health record indicated the following weights on the following dates: 2/6/23 at 147 pounds; 1/26/23 at 143 pounds; 1/20/23 at 145 pounds; and 1/12/23 at 145 pounds with a BMI (body mass index) of 20.8. The 1/22/23 registered dietician nutrition review indicated he was receiving 237 ml of Ensure Plus twice daily in between meals with good acceptance of the supplements. His estimated nutritional needs were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that hand hygiene was performed prior to donning sterile gloves and performing tracheostomy care of 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tracheostomy care (Resident 28). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 28 was reviewed on 3/1/23 at 11:38 a.m. The Resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure and dependence on ventilator. A care plan, dated 9/3/2015, indicated Resident 28 was at risk for respiratory distress related to tracheostomy. The goal was for her to be free of respiratory distress. The approached included, but were not limited to, provide tracheostomy care as ordered, dated 9/3/2015). A physician's order, dated 8/10/22, indicated she was to receive tracheostomy care, per standard of practice, with sterile water, and normal saline every shift. On 3/3/23 at 11:10 a.m., RT (Respiratory Therapist) 7 was observed providing tracheostomy care to Resident 28. RT 7 washed her hands with soap and water and donned non-sterile disposable gloves. She placed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident's pain that included location of the pain, intensity of the pain and effectiveness of an as needed (PRN) pain medication, and provide non-pharmacological interventions to address the resident's pain for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 3/1/23 at 1:30 p.m. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dementia. The Admissions 12/13/22 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated Resident B was cognitively impaired. A pain care plan for Resident B dated 12/5/22 indicated Resident is at risk for pain related to complaints of back pain, debility, PVD [Peripheral Vascular Disease], dx [diagnosis] depression, dx pain, lumbar fracture .Approach .Assist with positioning to comfort. Document effectiveness of prn medications .Offer non- pharmacological interventions such as quiet environment, rest, shower, back rub, reposition . A physician order dated 12/6/22 indicated Resident B was to receive 5-325 milligrams of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had adequate indication for use of an antibiotic, did not receive duplicate antibiotic therapy (Resident 58 and 31), and to monitor a resident's medication by not timely obtaining a VPA (valproic acid) lab, as ordered, (Resident 47) for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 58 was reviewed on 3/2/23 at 2:39 p.m. Resident 58's diagnoses included, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic kidney disease, diabetes type II, and syncope. A Nurse Practitioner's (NP) note dated 12/13/2022 at 12:01 p.m. indicated, Patient seen today for acute concern of cough, congestion, wheezing, fatigue, and chest pain. Patient reporting illness on 12/12/22 with STAT [sic, immediate] labs completed, CXR [chest x-ray]. WBC [white blood count] count on 12/12 is 5.1, and CXR was negative as well. Patient reported continued feeling of illness, fatigue, cough, congestion and right sided chest pain when breathing.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program which contains protocols to ensure residents who require antibiotics are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic, monitors/re-evaluates the use of antibiotics, provides appropriate indications for use, and failure to adhere to an algorithm for identification of a true infection for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents 58 and 31) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 58 was reviewed on 3/2/23 at 2:39 p.m. Resident 58's diagnoses included, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic kidney disease, diabetes type II, and syncope. A Nurse Practitioner's (NP) note dated 12/13/2022 at 12:01 p.m. indicated, Patient seen today for acute concern of cough, congestion, wheezing, fatigue, and chest pain. Patient reporting illness on 12/12/22 with STAT [sic, immediate] labs completed, CXR [chest x-ray]. WBC [white blood count] count on 12/12 is 5.1, and CXR was negative as well. Patient reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely administer a resident's influenza vaccination for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for vaccination. (Resident 56) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 56 was reviewed on 3/6/23 at 3:08 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure, anoxic brain damage, dependence on respirator, and Alzheimer's disease. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The physician's orders indicated she may have an annual flu vaccine, starting 3/1/22. Her 4/5/22 admission Agreement included an Influenza Vaccination Consent. The consent indicated she did not have any contraindications to receienving the influenza vaccine and wished to receive the influenza vaccine. It was docusigned by Resident 56 on 4/5/22 at 2:39 p.m. The Preventive Health Care section of the electronic health record indicated she received an influenza vaccine at the facility on 3/3/23. An interview was conducted with the IDNS (Interim Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 89 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Valparaiso Care & RehabilitationValparaiso, IN 2 of 5Arbor Grove VillageGreensburg, IN 2 of 5Bethany VillageIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Columbia Healthcare CenterEvansville, IN 2 of 5Community Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Eagle Valley MeadowsIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Harcourt Terrace Nursing And RehabilitationIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Harrison TerraceIndianapolis, IN 2 of 5Hickory Creek At New CastleNew Castle, IN 2 of 5Maple Park VillageWestfield, IN 2 of 5Park Terrace VillageEvansville, IN 2 of 5Riverside VillageElkhart, IN 2 of 5Trailpoint VillageSouth Bend, IN 2 of 5University Nursing CenterUpland, IN 2 of 5Williamsport Nursing And RehabilitationWilliamsport, IN 3 of 5Allisonville MeadowsFishers, IN 3 of 5American VillageIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Brownsburg MeadowsBrownsburg, IN 3 of 5Countryside MeadowsAvon, IN 3 of 5East Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterElkhart, IN 3 of 5Hickory Creek At CrawfordsvilleCrawfordsville, IN 3 of 5Hillcrest VillageJeffersonville, IN 3 of 5Rosebud VillageRichmond, IN 3 of 5Rosewalk VillageIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Rosewalk Village At LafayetteLafayette, IN 3 of 5Spring Mill MeadowsIndianapolis, IN 3 of 5Stonebrooke Rehabilitation CenterNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation CentreWabash, IN 4 of 5Beech Grove MeadowsBeech Grove, IN 4 of 5Clark Rehabilitation And Skilled Nursing CenterClarksville, IN 4 of 5Clinton GardensClinton, IN 4 of 5Creekside VillageMishawaka, IN 4 of 5Edgewater WoodsAnderson, IN 4 of 5Forest Creek VillageIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Franklin MeadowsFranklin, IN 4 of 5Heritage House Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterConnersville, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At ColumbusColumbus, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At MadisonMadison, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At PeruPeru, IN 4 of 5Hickory Creek At RochesterRochester, IN

Showing 40 of 89; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DRUMMER, CARLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
HANIFY, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
HORN, BRENDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/01/2023
LAZARD, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/29/2021
MANTRAVADI, GEETAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/21/2021
PAYNE, MONICAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/09/2021
BABCOCK, PAULIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/30/2020
CAINE, VIRGINIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/10/1994
HARRIS, LISAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/22/2003
AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/15/2026
DICE, MARKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
MANN, ROLANDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/15/2026
PIKE, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
SIGLER, MELANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/30/2025
VAN CAMP, STEVENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$798K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 2%Other / private 11%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $798K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$431per resident / day
operating cost
$13,101per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$377per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155226. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next