Clinton Gardens

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 72.6 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had effective pain management for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pain management (Resident 43). Findings include:On 8/05/2025 at 2:42 p.m., during an interview, Resident (43) indicated she received pain medication twice daily and indicated it was not helping to control her pain. The resident had asked for an increase in pain medication but was told she could not have more. She indicated they did administer Tylenol, but it was not effective. The resident demonstrated physical signs of pain during interview. On 8/08/2025 at 9:39 a.m., the medical record of Resident 43 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Admitting diagnoses included but not limited to displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur (fracture of the right thigh bone), subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) (a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medication according to physician orders and held medications without a physician order for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 6). Findings include:On 8/7/25 at 11:00 a.m., the medical record of Resident 6 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA) (stroke), dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities) and type 2 diabetes (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high).A physician order, dated 7/16/25, indicated to administer insulin glargine (the process of administering the hormone, insulin to a person, by injection to help regulate their blood sugar levels) 100 unit/mL (milliliter) (3 mL); amount: 10 units; subcutaneous (under the skin) twice a day.A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication prescription label matched the physician's order for 1 of 35 medication administrations observed (Resident 28). Findings include:On 8/8/25 at 8:47 a.m. Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 9 administered mirtazapine (antidepressant) 15 milligrams (mg), 2 tablets to Resident 28. The label on the mirtazapine medication card, dated 7/8/25, indicated mirtazapine 15 mg, 1 tablet by mouth daily. There was no directions changed sticker or indication that two tablets were ordered. At the same time, QMA 9 indicated the medication order was changed to two tablets on 8/4/25. Resident 28's record was reviewed on 8/8/25 at 2:39 p.m. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/23/25, indicated the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment and received an antidepressant during the assessment look-back period. A physician's order, dated 7/9/25 and discontinued on 7/15/25, indicated mirtazapine 15 mg by mouth once daily for appetite stimulation A physician's order, dated 7/15/25 and discontinued…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an influenza vaccination was offered or administered to 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident 1). Findings include:Resident 1's record was reviewed on 8/11/25 at 10:39 a.m. Census information indicated the resident was hospitalized from [DATE] to 9/17/24, 10/31/24 to 11/1/24, and 11/17/24 to 11/18/24. The resident's preventative health care record, dated 10/31/24, indicated the influenza vaccine was not administered related to other-transferred to hospital for further evaluation. The preventative health care record lacked further documentation regarding the resident's influenza vaccine. Progress notes, dated September 2024 to December 2024, lacked documentation the influenza vaccine was offered or declined during the flu season, or evidence it was clinically contraindicated. During an interview, on 8/11/25 at 1:25 p.m., the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) indicated the resident was not given an influenza vaccine because of her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician ordered medication was administered and documented appropriately for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident B) Findings include: During an interview on 6/9/25 at 1:35 p.m., Resident B indicated he had not received his nicotine patch 3-4 days last week and then again today. During the interview with Resident B, QMA 3 entered the room with his pain medication and indicated she had not applied his nicotine patch this morning because he had been in therapy. During a follow-up interview on 6/9/25 at 2:20 p.m., Resident B indicated QMA 3 had returned to his room, around 1:40 p.m., shortly after the initial interview and applied his nicotine patch. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/9/25 at 12:21 p.m. Diagnoses included displaced right hip fracture with routine healing following surgical intervention, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and adjustment disorder with depressed mood. Current signed physician's orders for the resident included, Nicotine patch 21…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration assessment had been completed for a resident who was observed to self-administer her medications for 1 or 1 random observation (Resident 15). Findings include: During a random observation of the breakfast meal in the main dining room, on 8/12/24 at 7:40 a.m., a medication cup containing 4 pills sat on the table in front of Resident 15. She self-administered the medications when her tray was delivered. No staff were present to observe the resident self-administer her medications. Resident 15's record was reviewed on 8/15/24 at 9:19 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, essential hypertension (a condition in which the blood vessels have persistently raised pressure), heart failure (a condition that occurs when the heart can't pump enough blood and oxygen to the body) and age-related macular degeneration (an eye disease that causes a breakdown of cells in the center of the retina, which is the light-sensitive tissue at the back of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were completed timely for 2 of 24 residents reviewed for care plan meetings (Residents 12 and 24). Findings include: 1. During an interview on 8/12/24 at 11:10 a.m., Resident 12 indicated she could not remember having any care plan meeting in the last three years. On 8/13/24 at 2:24 p.m., Resident 12's record was reviewed. Care plan meeting documentation was located for 5/8/24, 2/13/24, and 9/11/23. The record lacked care plan meeting documentation from between 9/11/23 and 2/13/24. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 7/29/24, indicated Resident 12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating she was cognitively intact. During an interview on 8/14/24 at 10:39 a.m., the Social Services Director (SSD) indicated she might have done the assessment but did not complete the meeting note. During an interview on 8/14/24 at 11:17 a.m., the SSD indicated that she did not have any notes,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) followed proper standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care (Resident 218). Findings include: During an interview, on 8/12/24 at 9:29 a.m., Resident 218 indicated she had several open areas to her bottom, and they had been there since before her admission to the facility. She acquired the areas while living at home. During an interview, on 8/14/24 at 7:50 a.m., QMA 3 indicated Resident 218 was getting ready to take a shower and therefore she would not be doing the dressing change until after her shower. She further indicated the dressing changes would be completed by the wound Nurse Practitioner, the Assistant Director of Nursing, or other staff working the hall. During an interview, on 8/14/24 at 8:30 a.m., Resident 218 indicated QMA 3 had completed her pressure ulcer dressing changes before to her bottom. Resident 218's record was reviewed on 8/13/24 at 2:23 p.m. The profile…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication storage areas were free from personal drinks, and failed to ensure expired medication was disposed of (Resident 38) for 2 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: 1. During observation of medication storage and labeling on 8/15/24 at 10:58 a.m., in the bottom drawer of the A-hall medication cart, observed a plastic restaurant cup with a label on the outside indicating it to be iced coffee from 8/15/24. The drink was stored amongst residents medications. During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 16 on 8/15/24 at 10:59 a.m., she indicated the drink belonged to her, and food or drink were not to be stored inside the medication carts. During an interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 8/16/24 at 9:57 a.m., she indicated staff were not supposed to have personal drinks in patient care areas, including the medication carts, and were supposed to keep them in the break room. 2. During an observation of medication storage and labeling on 8/15/24 at 11:19…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper food handling for 1 of 2 dining observations and failed to ensure proper handwashing for 3 of 3 dining observations. Findings include: 1. During a dining observation, on 5/30/23 at 11:32 a.m., Activity Assistant 14 was preparing drinks for the residents. She scooped ice into 2 glasses and returned the scoop into the ice bucket. The Activity Assistant served the drinks to 2 residents and returned to the cart to prepare more drinks. At 11:41 a.m., the ice scoop remained in the ice bucket. At 11:43 a.m., another staff member approached the ice bucket and placed the ice scoop into an empty pitcher next to the ice bucket. During an interview, on 6/5/23 at 11:01 a.m., the Culinary Manager indicated staff were not to leave the ice scoop in the ice bucket. They were to return it to the empty pitcher on the cart by the ice bucket. On 6/5/23 at 1:37 p.m., the Executive Director provided a document, dated 2/02 with a revised date 5/23, titled. Food Storage, and indicated it was the policy currently used by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $831K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN