Williamsport Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 23.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 62.1 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.483 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was in a sanitary condition and the facility failed to ensure cleaning logs were completed and kept up to date for 1 of 1 initial kitchen observations. This had the potential to affect 64 out of 64 people who consumed food out of the kitchen. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 6/9/25 at 10:00 a.m., the Dietary Cooperate Consultant was present during the initial tour. The convention oven burners were noted to have dark/chard particles caked on them. The grill next to the convention oven had food particles all around the outside rim of the grill. There was no food currently being cooked on the grill or oven at the time. The piping and wall behind the convention oven appeared dirty with old grease. The kitchen floor was dirty with food crumbs and pieces of paper towel throughout. Walk-in freezer contained food crumb/particles on the floor and shelving. During an interview, on 6/9/25 at 10:10 a.m., the Dietary Cooperate Consultant indicated the kitchen had a new dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and failed to serve food at the proper temperature for 1 of 1 test tray. This had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: 1. During an observation of the lunch service, on 6/9/25 at 11:50 a.m., The residents in the dining room were served a chicken salad sandwich, slice of lettuce, slice of tomato, beets, and sliced pears. This menu differed from what was to be served that day. The residents were to be served a bowl of tomato basil soup, hot tuna and cheese sandwich, pickled beets and sliced pears. During a dining room observation, on 6/9/24 at 12:27 p.m., Resident 31 was served her lunch tray, and she indicated she was tired of chicken salad, and they just had a chicken salad sandwich a couple of days ago. The resident also questioned the staff why they were also having chicken again for dinner. During an interview, on 6/10/25 at 2:44 p.m., the Dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's shower preferences were upheld for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for choices (Resident 54). Findings include: During an interview, on 6/9/25 at 11:16 a.m., Resident 54 indicated she wanted a shower every day but had never been asked how often she wanted one. Resident 54's record was reviewed on 6/12/25 at 11:08 a.m. Census information indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/1/25, indicated the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment, it was very important for her to choose the type of bath she received, and she required partial/moderate staff assistance with bathing. A preferences for customary routines and activities observation, dated 4/8/25, indicated the resident was interviewed to obtain the information in the document. The resident indicated it was very important for her to choose the type of bath she received, and she preferred to be bathed more…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the accurate coding of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 22 residents reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy (Resident 55). Findings include: Resident 55's record was reviewed on 6/11/25 at 11:58 a.m. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 4/15/25, indicated the resident received an anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication during the look-back period. A Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated April 2025, lacked documentation the resident received an anticoagulant medication. During an interview, on 6/13/25 at 10:17 a.m., the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) indicated she reviewed the MDS assessment, dated 4/15/25, and the resident's record. At the time of the MDS assessment, the resident was not on an anticoagulant medication. He was on an anticoagulant previously, but it was discontinued prior to the MDS assessment's look-back period. The assessment was coded in error. On 6/13/25 at 10:16 a.m., the DNS provided the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. During an interview, on 6/9/25 at 2:15 p.m., Resident 31 indicated she did not remember being invited to or attending a care plan meeting regularly. She did not recall when the last one was. Resident 31's record was reviewed on 6/11/25 at 11:29 a.m. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/30/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Census information indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Care Plan Summary note, dated 12/12/24, indicated a care plan meeting was conducted on this day for Resident 31. A Care Plan Summary note, dated 6/13/24, indicated a care plan meeting was conducted on this day for Resident 31. Resident 31's record lacked documentation of a quarterly care plan meeting being conducted for the last year from June 2024 to June 2025. The resident had two care plan meetings for the entire year. During an interview, on 6/11/25 at 1:28 p.m., the Social Service Director (SSD) indicated she would document a care plan summary note in the residents'…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were administered showers and shaved per resident preference for 2 of 24 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL), (Resident 50), (Resident 29). Findings include: 1. On 6/10/25 at 10:32 a.m., during initial observation and interview, Resident 50 observed to have extensive facial hair. The resident indicated he preferred to be shaved but the staff does not shave him, and due to poor vision he is unable to shave himself. The resident indicated he was scheduled to receive a shower on Monday and Friday, but he was not being administered regular showers. On 6/10/25 at 10:45 a.m., during an interview the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) indicated she was unsure how often the residents were shaved. On 6/10/25 at 10:46 a.m., during interview Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 5, indicated residents were shaved on the days they received a shower. She indicated they record administered showers on a shower sheet. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent potential accidents by ensuring medications were administered and disposed of according to medication professional standards for 2 of 5 residents reviewed (Residents 8 and 20). Findings include: 1. On 6/9/25 at 11:15 a.m., during an initial observation and resident interview, Resident 8 sat on side of bed. Two plastic medication cups containing several pills were observed. The resident indicated she had a rough night, and the nurse did not want to wake her up and left her medications on her overbed table. On 6/10/25 at 2:33 p.m., the medical record of Resident 8 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Admitting diagnoses included but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), alcoholic cirrhosis (a severe liver condition where healthy liver tissue is replaced by scar tissue due to long-term, excessive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had received a requested medication for muscle spasms (sudden involuntary powerful contraction of a muscle or muscle group) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain management (Resident 112). Findings include: During the initial pool interview, on 6/9/25 at 2:22 p.m., Resident 112 indicated she had requested an as needed (PRN) dose of her tizanidine (medication to treat muscle spasms) earlier in the morning when she had been given her pain medication. The nurse asked if she would consider waiting until after lunch due to the high risk of falling as the medication was known to lower blood pressure. The resident was confused as to why the nurse was concerned about her falling as she was in a wheelchair and was non-weight bearing (when no weight should be placed on an affected limb, usually after a surgical procedure). She indicated she reluctantly agreed, and requested, and was given, a Xanax (anti-anxiety medication). The nurse had not returned, after lunch, to check on her and offer the tizanidine, and now…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medication was labeled properly for 1 of 2 medication storage rooms reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: On 6/11/25 at 9:15 a.m., observed the North Hall medication storage room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 17. The refrigerator observed with an opened, undated vial of tuberculin solution. On 6/11/25 at 9:20 a.m., during an interview LPN 17 indicated medications must be dated when opened. On 6/11/25 at 11:30 a.m., during an interview the Director of Nurses (DON) indicated tuberculin solution must be dated when opened. On 6/11/2025 at 10:12 a.m., the DON provided a document, titled, Medication Storage and Expiration policy, dated 11/2024, and indicated it was the policy currently being used by the facility. The policy indicated, .9. Facility staff should record the date opened on the primary medication container (vial, bottle, inhaler) when the medication has a shortened expiration date once opened 3.1-25(j) 3.1-25(m) 3.1-25(n)

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a wound vacuum-assisted closure (vac) was placed properly for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wound treatment (Resident B). Findings include: Resident B's closed record was reviewed on 11/21/24 at 11:53 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute osteomyelitis (a serious bone infection that occurs when bacteria or other infectious agents spread to the bone) of the left ankle and foot, type 2 diabetes (a chronic disease that causes high levels of blood sugar, because the body doesn't produce enough insulin or doesn't use it properly) and diabetic foot ulcer (an open sore or wound that develops on the foot of a person with diabetes). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/18/24, indicated the resident had no cognitive deficit and required extensive assistance with daily living skills (the routine tasks that people perform to care for themselves and their surroundings). A care plan, dated 10/13/24, indicated the resident required implementation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $599K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN