Harcourt Terrace Nursing And Rehabilitation
8181 Harcourt Rd, Indianapolis, IN 46260 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (317) 872-7261 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.8% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.2% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 23.6% | 25.2% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.2% | 3.9% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.7% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 32.0% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.6% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.6% | 23.3% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.9% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.1% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.8% | 79.0% | 79.4% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.4%CMS range 29.2–61.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 6.2–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 81.4 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a diagnosis of dementia was provided effective person-centered dementia care and was not relocated to locked memory care unit without a documented reason which resulted in a resident-to-resident altercation for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dementia care. (Resident H and G) This deficient practice resulted in an altercation between Resident H and G. Resident G received an intertrochanteric femur fracture (a broken hip around the upper thigh bone) which required surgical intervention.Findings include:An anonymous email, dated 5/3/25 at 4:52 p.m., indicated a resident-to-resident altercation occurred in which Resident G was pushed down by Resident H. Resident G complained of pain and required surgery. Facility management were not taking reports seriously, were hiding and sweeping concerns under the rug and were lying to families.A facility reported incident (FRI), dated 4/27/26 at 5:30 p.m., indicated Resident G walked by Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective person-centered dementia care was provided to a resident with known physically aggressive behaviors for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for dementia care. (Residents H and J) This deficient practice resulted in an altercation between Resident H and J. Resident J received a fractured left wrist and a laceration above his right eye. The deficient practice was corrected on 7/10/24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include: A facility document, titled Indiana State Department of Health Survey Report System, indicated on 7/2/24 at 9:30 p.m., Resident J complained of arm pain after an interaction with Resident H. Resident J received a fractured ulna (left wrist bone) during the altercation with Resident H. Resident H was sent to a psychiatric hospital for evaluation and treatment. A facility document, titled Event Report, dated 7/1/24 at 7:00 p.m., indicated Resident H was in the dining room hitting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0560 — isolatedProtect a residents' right to refuse some types of non-requested transfers within the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a relocation planning conference meeting was held with the resident's responsible party and the Executive Director prior to moving the resident onto a locked memory care unit and prior to moving the resident out of the locked memory care unit and back to the skilled unit for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for transfers. (Resident H)Findings include:During an interview, on 5/19/26 at 1:05 p.m., Resident H's resident representative indicated due to his profession, he was unable to visit Resident H often but the last time he went to the facility to visit, all Resident H's belongings were gone, and Resident H was not in his room. He asked a staff member where Resident H was and was told the dementia unit. Resident H's son explained he had not been to the dementia unit before and did not know where the unit was, so he asked the staff member how to get there. To get to the dementia unit, he had to go through two sets of locked doors. When he entered the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse and intimidation (Resident B) by another resident (Resident C) for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse.Findings include:During an observation and interview, on 3/30/26 at 11:04 a.m., Resident B was lying in bed, covered with a sheet and had a back scratcher resting on the right side of the bed next to him. Resident B indicated he had no complaints regarding the staff, but Resident C cussed at him last evening (3/29/26) while a nurse was providing tracheostomy care for him. Resident C was his old roommate and now lived in the room across the hall from him. Resident C yelled and cussed at him for no reason.During an observation and interview, on 3/31/26 at 12:18 p.m., Resident B was lying in bed, covered with a sheet and had a back scratcher resting on the right side of the bed next to him. His right hand was resting on the back scratcher. Resident B indicated it bothered him when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered, labs were obtained, and admission orders were transcribed according to the physician's orders for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident J and E)Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 3/30/26 at 11:00 a.m., Resident J indicated on the morning of 2/7/26, the facility staff did not give him his insulin medication. The clinical record for Resident J was reviewed on 3/30/26 at 11:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes, anemia, and hypertension A physician's order, dated 12/2/25, indicated to administer 16 units of lispro insulin three (3) times a day with meals. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated, on 2/7/26, the 7:30 a.m. dose was not administered. During an interview, on 3/31/26 at 11:55 a.m., Unit Manager (4) indicated due to the resident's preference, Resident J did not want her to administer his insulin the morning of 2/7/26. She passed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the same size tracheostomy canula was kept at bedside as ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident B)Findings include:During an observation, on 4/1/26 at 11:21 a.m., Resident B had a tracheostomy.The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/1/26 at 12:00 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure and sleep apnea.A physician's order, dated 2/2/26, indicated the tracheostomy type and size was a Bivona tracheostomy XL 7 (a silicone, wire-reinforced, extra-length tracheostomy tube deigned for adult patients who require deeper airway access).A physician's order, dated 2/2/26, indicated to keep a small tracheostomy canula and the same size tracheostomy canula at bedside.During an interview, on 4/1/26 at 11:25 a.m., RN 2 indicated the tracheostomy canula stored at the bedside was a size 6. She would have to check to see if the facility stored the same size canula at bedside.During an interview, on 4/1/26 at 11:30 a.m., the Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were disposed of in a secure and safe method to prevent diversion and/or accidental exposure for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident E)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 3/30/26 at 11:05 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right dominant side, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), aphasia (inability to produce speech), and dysarthria (motor speech disorder which impairs control of the muscles used for speech).Resident E was admitted , on 1/14/26 at 11:08 a.m., from a rehabilitation (rehab) hospitalThe rehab hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated speech-language pathology evaluated the patient for dysphagia and communication deficits. The patient was found to have mild oral phase deficits, characterized by right anterior loss and pocketing, intermittent cough with thin liquids and solids.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a provided diet was comparable and compatible to the diet ordered from a rehabilitation hospital on admission for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. (Resident E)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 3/30/26 at 11:05 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right dominant side, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), aphasia (inability to produce speech), and dysarthria (motor speech disorder which impairs control of the muscles used for speech).Resident E was admitted , on 1/14/26 at 11:08 a.m., from a rehabilitation (rehab) hospitalThe rehab hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated speech-language pathology evaluated the patient for dysphagia and communication deficits. The patient was found to have mild oral phase deficits, characterized by right anterior loss and pocketing, intermittent cough with thin liquids and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure speech therapy was initiated and provided to a resident who admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of dysphagia (swallowing disorder) and on a therapeutic diet for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for therapy services. (Resident E)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 3/30/26 at 11:05 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right dominant side, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), aphasia (inability to produce speech), and dysarthria (motor speech disorder which impairs control of the muscles used for speech).Resident E was admitted , on 1/14/26 at 11:08 a.m., from a rehabilitation (rehab) hospitalThe rehab hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated speech-language pathology evaluated the patient for dysphagia and communication deficits. The patient was found to have mild oral phase deficits, characterized by right anterior loss and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated items were labeled with a received dated and disposed of by the discard date in 2 of 2 reach-in refrigerators reviewed in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 81 of 81 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include:During an observation and interview, on 1/5/26 at 9:47 a.m., five (5) gallons of 2% milk were in the reach-in refrigerator and did not a have a receive date label. Culinary manager 12 indicated she would place received dates on them. During an observation and interview, on 1/5/26 at 9:50 a.m., there was one (1) cottage cheese container which had a use by date of 12/29/25 and another cottage cheese container which was not labeled with a received date and had a best by date of 12/28/25. Neither had been discarded. Culinary manager 12 indicated both containers should have been discarded.During an interview, on 1/9/26 at 10:36 a.m., the Director of Nursing indicated there were no residents in the building with a nothing by mouth (NPO) diet.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment when entering isolation rooms and to ensure a 2-Step tuberculosis test was documented as completed in the recommended timeframe for 4 of 8 residents and 1 of 5 new employees reviewed for infection control. (Resident 44, 48, 53, 56 and Activity Assistant 7)Findings include:During a telephone interview, on 1/6/26 at 8:30 a.m., a resident's family member indicated one of their concerns was the facility had a Covid outbreak and the staff were not wearing PPE such as gowns and masks when entering the rooms.1. During an observation, on 1/5/26 at 10:53 a.m., an isolation cart was observed outside the residents' room and signs indicated the room was a droplet/contact precaution isolation room. The sign indicated, in addition to standard precautions, everyone must wear a gown, an N95 Respirator (a specific mask), eye protection, and gloves. The room was a double occupancy room shared by Resident 44 and 48.During an observation, on 1/5/26 at 3:31 p.m., QMA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident or the resident's representative was informed of the risks and benefits of a medication, all available treatment options, and to document their chosen treatment option for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 72, 73 and 24)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 72 was reviewed on 1/7/25 at 12:01 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia with anxiety, depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, opioid dependence, chronic pain, severe bipolar disorder with psychotic features, Wernicke's encephalopathy, insomnia, and alcohol dependence in remission. A physician's order, dated 10/16/24, indicated to administer sertraline (an antidepressant medication) 150 milligrams (mg) once a day. A physician's order, dated 12/18/24 and discontinued 5/20/25, indicated to administer Depakote Sprinkles (a seizure medication also used to treat manic episodes related to bipolar disorder) 125 mg twice a day. A physician's order, dated 5/20/25, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to document a resident's behaviors or distress which required the increase or addition of a psychotropic medication or the non-pharmaceutical interventions used to treat the behaviors for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 72)Findings include:During an observation, on 1/5/26 at 10:57 a.m., Resident 72 was in bed with her eyes closed and her arm hanging off the bed. During an observation, on 1/5/26 at 2:47 p.m., Resident 72 was in bed with a flat effect and was speaking very slowly. During an observation, on 1/6/26 at 10:05 a.m. and 1:57 p.m., Resident 72 was in her bed with her eyes closed. During an observation, on 1/7/26 at 11:01 a.m. and 2:20 p.m., Resident 72 was asleep in her bed. During an observation, on 1/8/26 at 10:59 a.m., Resident 72 was lying on her side asleep in her bed. During an observation, on 1/9/26 at 10:38 a.m., Resident 72 was slowly ambulating to the bathroom without assistance. The clinical record for Resident 72 was reviewed on 1/7/25 at 12:01 p.m. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman was notified of residents' discharge for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 21 and Resident 73)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 73 was reviewed on 1/6/26 at 9:42 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, Alzheimer's dementia, and major depressive disorder. The clinical record indicated Resident 73 was discharged to a psychiatric facility on 10/29/25. There was no documentation to indicate the Ombudsman was notified of the transfer/discharge in the clinical record. The list of residents on the transfer/discharge notification to the Ombudsman, for October, November and December 2025, was reviewed on 1/6/26 at 3:50 p.m. Resident 73 was not found to be listed on the documents. 2. The clinical record for Resident 21 was reviewed on 1/7/26 at 11:47 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, syncope and collapse, and hypertension. The clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) tracking assessment was transmitted as required for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for MDS. (Resident 12)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 12 was reviewed on [DATE] at 1:56 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, heart failure, and generalized anxiety.A nursing progress note, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 12 had expired with his family at the bedside.The MDS tracking assessment for the death in the facility was not located in the medical record. During an interview, on [DATE] at 2:18 p.m., MDS Coordinator 1 indicated the assessment for death in the facility needed to be completed in seven days. If the assessment was not completed in seven days, it would be late. The resident should have had the MDS completed by [DATE].During an interview, on [DATE] at 12:18 p.m., the Director of Nursing indicated the facility did not have a policy for MDS. During an interview, on [DATE] at 9:36 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was set on the correct liter flow according to the physician's order for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 62)Findings include:During an observation, on 1/6/26 at 10:10 a.m., Resident 62 was receiving oxygen, and it was set between 3 and 3.5 liters. During an observation, on 1/7/26 at 9:07 a.m., Resident 62 was receiving oxygen, and it was set on 3 liters. During an interview, on 1/7/26 at 9:10 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 11 indicated she changed the setting from 3 liters of oxygen to 2 liters of oxygen. It was supposed to be on 2 liters of oxygen according to the physician's order.The clinical record for Resident 62 was reviewed on 1/6/26 at 12:15 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure and sleep apnea. A physician's order, dated 10/22/20, indicated to administer 2 liters of oxygen continuously when the resident was not wearing a BiPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) machine. A care plan, dated 10/22/20, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were free from loose pills, medications contained pharmacy labels, opened medications were labeled with the date the medication was opened, unopened medications which required refrigeration were stored properly, expired medications were not stored in the medication cart, and damaged medication packaging was not secured with tape for 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed for medication labeling and storage. (Willow Bend 2/Moving Forward cart and Augustes Cottage CB cart)Findings include:1. During an observation, on 1/8/26 at 10:03 a.m., the [NAME] Bend 2/Moving Forward medication cart had the following:a. Breztri Aerosphere inhalation (an aerosol respiratory inhaler) with 25 of 28 administrations remaining did not contain a pharmacy label, was not in the medication packaging, and was missing an open date.b. Latanoprost eye drops with instructions to keep the medication refrigerated until it was opened did not have an open date and the sealed medication cap was still present on the bottle.c.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure furnishings remained in a safe and homelike condition in 1 of 1 dining room observed for environment. (Men's Memory Care Unit)Findings include:During an observation, on 1/5/26 at 11:58 a.m., a dining table placed in front of the nursing station and close to the window was observed to have approximately one quarter of the laminate coating torn off which exposed a composite board surface. A male resident was seated at the spot where the cover was missing and was running his hand on the loose material. There was no debris around the resident to indicate he had removed the table laminate.During an observation, on 1/6/26 at 12:11 p.m., the table was observed in use and in the same condition.During an interview, on 1/7/26 at 8:26 a.m., LPN 9 indicated she was not sure if the table had been reported to maintenance.During an interview, on 1/7/26 at 8:27 a.m., LPN 19 indicated she would put another maintenance request in for the table and the tabletop was peeled off last night (1/6/26).During an observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident B)Findings include:A facility reported incident, dated 9/22/25, indicated a staff member had a concern regarding a female resident who was treated roughly by a QMA (Qualified Medication Aide) during care on 9/15/25 at 8:01 p.m. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 9/23/25 at 1:45 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with other behavioral disturbances, Alzheimer's disease, generalized anxiety disorder, pain, difficulty in walking, and cognitive communication deficit.A care plan, dated 10/19/23, indicated Resident B refused medications and ancillary services. The interventions included, but were not limited to, offer other staff as needed, provide Resident B with safety and redirect the resident as needed.A care plan, dated 10/19/23, indicated Resident B had a hearing loss. The interventions included, but were not limited to, facing the resident when speaking, obtain the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activity of Daily Living (ADL) care was provided in a safe and comfortable manner for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Resident B and C)Findings include:A facility reported incident, dated 9/22/25, indicated a staff member had a concern regarding a resident who was treated roughly by a QMA (Qualified Medication Aide).1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 9/23/25 at 1:45 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with other behavioral disturbances, Alzheimer's disease, generalized anxiety disorder, pain, difficulty in walking, and cognitive communication deficit.A care plan, dated 11/8/22, indicated Resident B required assistance with ADLs including bed mobility and transfers. The interventions included, but were not limited to, assist with bed mobility, transfers, and locomotion/ambulation as needed.A facility document, titled Employee Communication Form, dated 9/19/25, indicated QMA 1 was terminated from the facility for a violation of resident rights related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary, and homelike environment was provided for 1 of 12 rooms reviewed for environment. (room [ROOM NUMBER]) Findings include: During an observation, on 7/2/25 at 9:18 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] had an old urine smell to it. There were approximately 7 different flies in the room. 2 flies were crawling on top of Resident B as he was sleeping. There were also 2 flies in his cup of juice and a sock on his bedside table. The bedside commode had a very small amount of dark yellow urine in the basin. In room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom, there was a dried, dark drown substance smeared on the toilet with 2 flies crawling on the substance. There was also a puddle of liquid on the floor with dark yellow liquid on the trash can liner. Resident B and C resided in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 7/2/25 at 10:15 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, osteoarthritis, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy was provided during personal care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident 376) Findings include: During an observation, on 1/27/25 at 10:54 a.m., LPN 5 entered Resident 376's room to administer a gastrostomy tube (a feeding tube inserted into the abdomen directly into the stomach) bolus (a method of administering liquid food directly into the stomach) of Jevity 1.5 (a nutrition supplement). The resident's door was left open. LPN 5 pulled the resident's cover back and lifted his gown exposing his abdomen. The privacy curtain in the resident's room was not closed and three people walked by the resident's room. The clinical record for Resident 376 was reviewed on 1/23/25 at 3:42 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your body tissue), convulsions, congestive heart failure, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and atrial fibrillation. During an interview, on 1/27/25 at 11:35 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for a resident with a hand splint for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident 33) Findings include: During an observation, on 1/22/25 at 12:10 p.m., Resident 33 was sitting in the dining room. Unit Manager 4 entered the dining room and placed a blue hand splint on the resident's right hand. During an observation, on 1/23/25 at 11:00 a.m., the resident was sitting in the activity room, and a hand splint was on her right hand. During an observation, on 1/27/25 at 10:27 a.m., the resident was sitting in the activity room, and a hand splint was on her right hand. The clinical record for Resident 33 was reviewed on 1/23/25 at 3:19 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, transient ischemic attack (temporary disruption in the blood supply to a part of the brain), hypertension, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. The electronic medical record did not include a physician's order or a care plan for a right-hand splint. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services were obtained timely to support a resident's healthcare needs for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident 376) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 376 was reviewed on 1/23/25 at 3:42 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, convulsions, congestive heart failure, emphysema, and encephalopathy (a change in your brain function due to injury or disease). A care plan, dated 3/8/24, indicated the resident was at risk for injury related to seizure activity. Interventions included, but were not limited to, administer medications as ordered. A physician's order, dated 1/9/25, indicated to give Lacosamide (an anticonvulsant medication) 10 milligrams (mg)/ 1 milliliter (ml) solution twice a day. The physician's order for Lacosamide 10 mg/1 ml solution was ordered on 1/9/25 and was not available until 1/22/25. The resident received his first dose on 1/22/25 at 11:05 a.m. The resident missed 26 doses of the medication. During an interview, on 1/27/25 at 9:53…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for side effects of antipsychotic medications with the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) according to the policy and procedure for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 37 and 45) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 37 was reviewed on 1/27/25 at 10:44 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, dementia with other behavioral disturbance and agitation, bipolar disorder, mood disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and moderate recurrent major depressive disorder. A care plan, dated 10/10/23, indicated the resident was at risk for adverse side effects related to the use of psychotropic medication, antipsychotic, antidepressant and antianxiety medication. A physician's order, dated 1/1/24, indicated to give risperidone (an atypical antipsychotic medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg) twice a day. A physician's order, dated 5/2/24, indicated to give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was complete and accurately reflected the care provided for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for accurate documentation. (Resident 55 and 18) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 55 was reviewed on 1/27/24 2:52 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus, dementia, and hypertension. A care plan, dated 7/25/23, indicated the resident was at risk for altered nutritional status related to dementia, hypertension, and schizophrenia. Interventions included, but were not limited to, offer bedtime snacks. A physician's order, dated 11/7/23, indicated to administer a bedtime snack to the resident. The January 2025 Medication/Treatment record indicated snacks were not administered because they were not available on January 6th, 13th, 15th and 20th. The documentation indicated that the resident was given 0 (zero) bedtime snacks on those days. 2. The clinical record for Resident 18 was reviewed on 1/28/25 at 3:03 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had been assessed to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medication administration. (Resident B) Finding includes: During an interview and observation, on 10/23/24 at 9:16 a.m., Resident B was up in her room. A clear plastic cup was noted on the table with approximately eight pills in the cup. Resident B indicated the nurse brought the medications to her when she was bathing or dressing and she was to take the medications when she ate, so the nurse left the pills in the room. The resident's breakfast tray was noted to be on the table and untouched. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 10/23/24 at 10:27 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease, and chronic systolic heart failure. There was no physician's order, care plan or assessment to indicate the resident was able to self-administer medications found in the record. During an interview, on 10/23/24 at 9:45 a.m., RN 1 indicated she went to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure cups were free of film/build up from hard water prior to using the cups to serve drinks to residents for 1 of 1 dishwasher reviewed. Finding includes: During an observation of the kitchen, on 10/23/24 at 8:59 a.m., clean cups were found to be stored in the dishwasher room. They were stored bottom up in large plastic dishwasher crates in a shallow square container with wheels that set up off the floor approximately six inches. There were 18 of 29 cups found to have a white film in the bottom, inside of the cups. The film could be scrapped off the bottom of the cup. There were also an additional 9 of 9 cups with handles, found stored in a separate dishwasher crate, also containing a film at the bottom. During an interview, on 10/23/24 at 9:01 a.m., Dietary Staff 2 indicated the cups were used to serve fluids. The Kitchen Manager supplied the salt, and they were out of salt. All the cups had been washed. During a random observation, on 10/23/24 at 9:09 a.m., Resident B was observed to move his bedside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure weights and physician notification were completed as ordered for residents with congestive heart failure (CHF), to document accu checks (finger stick blood sugars) and insulin administration and failed to ensure a resident with routine orders for Ativan and morphine received the medication as ordered for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 8, 10, 75 and 81) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 8 was reviewed on 12/07/23 at 9:39 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic (congestive) systolic heart failure and chronic kidney disease stage 3. A physician's order, dated to 10/19/23, indicated to obtain daily weights for congestive heart failure and to notify the physician for a weight gain of 3 pounds in a day or 5 pounds in a week. A Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 10/1/23 to 10/31/23, indicated 4 missing weights for 10/14, 10/15, 10/16, and 10/19/2023. There was incomplete information on 10/3, 10/4, 10/5, and 10/6/23. A MAR, dated 11/1/23 to 11/30/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications administered orally were separated from topical medications, to store cleaning supplies separately from medications, medication carts were clean and free of loose medications, medications were not relabeled for use for another resident, opened medications were dated, medications were stored in the refrigerator until opened, discontinued and expired medications were disposed of routinely and medication storage refrigerators were clean for 3 of 3 medication carts reviewed and 1 of 1 medication storage rooms reviewed. (The women's memory care medication cart, the men's memory care medication cart, the [NAME] Bend medication cart #2 and the women's memory care medication storage room). Findings include: 1. During a medication cart observation with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), on 12/7/23 at 11:03 a.m., the women's memory care unit cart was observed to have the following: a. The top left drawer had bisacodyl (a stool softener) suppositories sitting next to one bottle of eye drops and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-11 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was documentation to show the resident/representative made the choice about the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) and to ensure the resident's financial representative was notified of the SNF ABN for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notification. (Resident 6 and 56) Findings include: 1. The SNF ABN for Resident 6 indicated the resident no longer required skilled nursing care and did not need skilled rehabilitation on a daily basis. Beginning on 11/19/23, the resident's stay would not be covered under Medicare. The options indicated the resident/representative was to check only one box and the facility could not choose a box for the resident/representative. Option 2 was checked to indicate the resident/representative wanted the care listed above and did not want Medicare billed. The resident/representative understood they may be billed now because they were responsible for the payment of the care. They could not appeal because Medicare would not be billed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-11 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a new PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) level I when a resident was started on a new psychotropic medication for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 44 and 38) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 44 was reviewed on 12/8/23 at 10:25 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, major depression with agitation, bipolar disorder, and other personality and behavioral disorder. A PASARR level I, dated 4/18/2019, indicated the resident had one mental health diagnoses of personality change and was not taking any antipsychotic medications. A PASARR level II, dated 8/11/22, indicated the resident was added a bipolar diagnosis and was not taking any antipsychotic medications. A physician's order, with a start date of 9/2/22 and an end date of 9/21/23, indicated the resident took Olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication) 5 milligrams (mg) at bedtime. There was no new PASARR done after the resident was started on an antipsychotic medication. During an interview, on 12/8/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was documentation in the Electronic Health Record to include if the resident went to the scheduled dialysis treatments for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis. Resident 39) Finding includes: The record for Resident 39 was reviewed on 12/7/23 at 10:38 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, generalized anxiety disorder, and chronic embolism and thrombosis of the right jugular vein. A physician's order, dated 6/20/23, indicated dialysis days on Monday, Wednesdays, and Fridays with a chair time of 9:15 a.m. The was no documentation in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for 11/15/23, 11/22/23, 11/24/23 and 11/29/23 to indicate if the resident went to dialysis or did not go to dialysis. There were no progress notes, no dialysis events, and no dialysis communication form. There was no event for dialysis on 10/30/23, 11/6/23, 11/8/23, 11/10/23, 11/13/23, 11/27/23, 11/29/23 or 12/4/23 for the dialysis treatment. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the narcotic count sheets were signed by two nurses to verify the correct count of controlled substances between shifts for 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed. (the women's memory care medication cart and the [NAME] bend #2 medication cart) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 12/7/23 beginning at 11:03 a.m., the following was observed on the Shift Change Verification of Controlled Substances form, dated December 2023, for the women's memory care unit: a. The form was labeled the Cedar Bay unit for December 2023. a. The same nurse signed the on-coming nurse space and the off-going nurse space for the night shift on December 2. b. There were no nurse signatures on the day shift and evening shift for December 5. c. The same nurse signed as the on-coming and off-going nurse for the evening shift on December 6. d. There was only one nurse signature on the on-coming nurse space and no signature for the off-going nurse for the day shift on December 7. e. There was only one nurse signature on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of odors on the south hall and around the nursing station on the skilled unit for 1 of 3 units reviewed for environment. (Willow Bend Unit) Findings include: During a walk through of the facility, on 10/23/23 at 9:27 a.m., a very strong smell of urine was noted in the south hall of the skilled care unit (Willow Bend Unit). The smell was strongest between rooms 15-18. During an interview, on 10/23/23 at 9:32 a.m., RN 5 indicated staff was changing residents at the time and then walked down the hall. She returned at 9:33 a.m., and indicated she would call housekeeping and locate the source of the urine smell and have it cleaned if needed. She then walked down the hall towards the end to a room on the left and knocked on the door, and again returned and indicated the smell was coming from that room, the resident refused care and was care planned for refusing care. During a random walk through of the [NAME] Bend Unit, on 10/24/23 at 8:33 a.m., a smell of urine was noted at the nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident from abuse when the resident was reported to have been hit in the back of the head/neck by a staff member for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. The deficient practice was corrected on 10/13/23, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Finding includes: An Incident Report to the Indiana Department of Health, dated 10/8/23, indicated the Executive Director was notified by staff another resident made contact with a resident in the TV room. They type of injury was redness to the back of the neck. The action taken by facility included ensuring resident safety, the Executive Director was notified, the employee was immediately suspended pending an investigation. The investigation was to include staff and resident interviews and skin assessments for residents who were unable to be interviewed. During an observation, on 10/23/23 at 3:49 p.m., Resident B was up in a recliner in the television room (also referred to as Man Cave and Theater Room) on the men's memory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored safely in the original containers until the time of administration for 12 of 17 residents on the [NAME] Cottage Memory Care Unit. (Residents 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13) Finding includes: During an observation, on 10/25/23 at 8:42 a.m., QMA 3 was observed to remove a clear plastic medication cup of medications from the top drawer of the medication cart. She was not observed to set up the medications individually using the computer or medication cards to prep the medications. The drawer of the medication cart contained multiple cups of medications with names written on each cup. QMA 3 indicated there were 10 cups of medications in the drawer. Before the QMA could answer any questions, LPN 4, who had been standing approximately three feet behind the QMA approached the medication cart and indicated to the QMA medications could not be set up in cups, they needed to be prepped one at a time. The QMA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-26 for 19 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.4 | -2.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 89 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 89; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DRUMMER, CARL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2017 |
| HANIFY, THOMAS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2022 |
| HORN, BRENDA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 12/01/2023 |
| LAZARD, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/29/2021 |
| MANTRAVADI, GEETA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 07/21/2021 |
| PAYNE, MONICA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 08/09/2021 |
| BABCOCK, PAUL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/30/2020 |
| CAINE, VIRGINIA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/10/1994 |
| HARRIS, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/22/2003 |
| AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2011 |
| BRUME, TEGA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/18/2025 |
| DICE, MARK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2023 |
| HUNTER, KIMBERLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/28/2026 |
| KALU, CHIJIOKE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2024 |
| VAN CAMP, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $873K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155149. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.