Clark Rehabilitation And Skilled Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 36.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 72.5 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-03-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. The clinical record for Resident 47 was reviewed on 3/9/22 at 10:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (problems with thinking, movement, behavior, and mood), unspecified intellectual disabilities, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, ESBL (extended beta-lactamase) resistance, osteomyelitis, and pressure ulcer of sacral region Stage IV(full skin loss extends below the subcutaneous fat into the deep tissues, including muscle, tendons, and ligaments). The care plan, dated 3/31/21 and last revised 3/7/23, indicated the resident had impaired skin integrity including a pressure area to her coccyx. She was at risk for further skin breakdown due to sensory perception being slightly limited; skin was very moist; she was chairfast; had very limited mobility; her nutrition was probably inadequate; and friction and shear was a problem. She preferred to lay flat on her back most of the day, she would occasionally turn slightly for very short periods of time, despite education. She frequently refused to turn,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate intervention to prevent a fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls, which resulted in the resident having broken bones, bruising, and skin tears. (Resident 35) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 35 was reviewed on 3/9/23 at 2:18 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, a fall slipping, tripping, and stumbling; muscle weakness; stiffness of the left ankle; pain in the right knee; stiffness of the right hip and right ankle; idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy; contracture of the left and right ankle; mechanical complication of the internal fixation device of the right femur for a displaced supracondylar fracture; abnormal posture; and the need for assistance with personal care. The physician's order, dated 2/8/22, indicated the resident was to have two quarter side rails to enhance bed mobility related to weakness. The order was discontinued on 3/2/23. The care plan, dated 11/08/18…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' (Residents B, C, D and E) medication administration records reflected medications administered for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for medical records. Findings include:1.The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 1/21/26 at 1:51 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, a history of a deep vein thrombosis (dangerous formation of a blood clot inside a vein or artery) and neuropathy (nerve damage or dysfunction). Review of the January 2026 medication administration record (MAR) indicated the resident was to receive the following medications:-Eliquis (blood thinner) 5 mg (milligrams) twice daily between 7:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. and again between 7:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m.-Gabapentin 600 mg in the evening at 10:00 p.m. The January 2026 MAR lacked documentation of the administration of the above medications on the following dates and times:-Eliquis 5 mg, between 7:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m., on 1/12/26, 1/13/26, 1/15/26, 1/16/26, 1/17/26 and 1/20/26.-Gabapentin 600 mg at 10:00 p.m. on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-29 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure misappropriation of residents' property did not occur for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents B, C, and D) Findings include:1.The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 10/29/25 at 11:14 a.m. The residents' diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fibromyalgia, depression and chronic pain syndrome. The resident's admission minimum data set assessment indicated the resident's cognition was intact. The physician's order, dated 10/6/25, indicated the resident was to receive Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (narcotic pain medication) 10-325 mg (milligrams) every 8 hours as needed for pain.Review of the October 2025 controlled substance record indicated on 10/9/25 at 4:00 a.m., the resident was administered a dose of the narcotic pain medication from Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 10.The October 2025 medication administration record, dated 10/9/25 at 4:53 a.m., indicated LPN 10 documented the administration of the resident's narcotic pain medication.Review of the timeline provided by the Executive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a staff followed the scope of practice for certified nursing assistants for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for services provided. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 10/29/25 at 11:14 a.m. The residents' diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fibromyalgia, depression and chronic pain syndrome. During an interview, on 10/29/25 at 1:48 p.m., the Regional Nurse Consultant indicated it was identified that on 10/8/25, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 10 provided Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 11 with a resident's pain medication in a cup and CNA 11 entered Resident B's room with the medication cup. Review of the timeline provided by the Executive Director on 10/29/25 at 2:26 p.m., indicated the following: -The video footage was reviewed starting on 10/8/25 at 10:30 p.m., LPN 10 entered Resident B's room at 10:40 p.m. with a medication cup and water. LPN 10 exited the room in less than a minute and then entered another resident's room, at which time, Resident B turned her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication administration records accurately reflected the administration of controlled substances 4 of 4 residents reviewed for medical records. (Resident B, C, D and E) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/30/25 at 10:45 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, chronic pain and gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the rectum. The June 2025 medication administration (MAR) record indicated the resident was to receive Oxycodone 15 mg (milligrams) every 4 hours for pain at 12:00 a.m., 4:00 a.m., 8:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., 4:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. The June 2025 controlled substance record indicated the resident received the Oxycodone on the following dates and times: - 6/02/25 at 8:00 p.m. - 6/03/25 at 8:00 p.m. - 6/04/25 at 12:00 a.m. - 6/05/25 at 12:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. - 6/06/25 at 12:00 a.m., 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. - 6/07/25 at 4:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. On 6/9/25, the resident was admitted to the hospital and returned on 6/16/25. The physician's order,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was in place for a resident (Resident B) for an additional dose of a narcotic pain medication and failed to ensure scheduled medications were administered to a resident (Resident C) on dialysis days for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/30/25 at 10:45 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, chronic pain and gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the rectum. The physician's order, dated 2/27/25, indicated the resident was to receive Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) 15 mg (milligrams) every 4 hours for pain at 12:00 a.m., 4:00 a.m., 8:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., 4:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Review of the May 2025 controlled substance record indicated on 5/31/25 at 12:00 a.m., the medication was signed out as given twice by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4. On 7/1/25 at 9:53 a.m., the Executive Director and Assistant Director of Nursing provided a statement from LPN 4 and indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided consistently for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living care. (Residents 19 and 67) 1. The record for Resident 19 was reviewed on 4/1/24 at 11:03 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, sepsis, muscle weakness, vascular dementia, personal history of traumatic brain injury, anxiety, flaccid hemiplegia affecting the left nondominant side and bipolar disorder. The care plan, dated 8/5/18 and revised on 2/20/24, indicated the Resident required assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living) included bed mobility, transfers, eating and toileting. The interventions included, but were not limited to, assist with oral care at least two times daily, and assist with bathing as needed per resident preference. Staff were to offer the resident's showers two times per week and provide a partial bath in between. The Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 2/15/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. He was dependent on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a splint device was provided to prevent a decrease in range of motion for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for range of motion. (Resident 40) Findings include: The record for Resident 40 was reviewed on 4/3/24 at 2:07 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting the left non-dominant side, spastic hemiplegia affecting the left nondominant side, attention and concentration deficit following cerebral infarction, spastic hemiplegia affecting left dominant side, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. The care plan, dated 9/13/19, indicated the resident required assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) including bed mobility, and transfers related to a decrease in strength and an increase in weakness, and a CVA (cardiovascular accident) with left sided hemiplegia. The interventions, dated 11/12/19, included, but were not limited to, apply the LUE (left upper extremity) hand splint…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0776 — isolated
  Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure radiology results were obtained, in a timely manner, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for radiology services. (Resident B) Findings include: On 1/31/24 at 1:40 p.m., the resident was observed sitting up in his wheelchair with his call light in reach with no signs of any pain or discomfort. He indicated his shoulder was still a little sore but was much better. His pain was controlled and they check on him frequently. He had no concerns with his care. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 1/31/24 at 10:56 a.m. The diagnosis included, but were not limited to, left sided hemiparesis and left clavicle fracture. Review of the August 2023 - December 2023 indicated the resident had not complained of any pain. The progress note, dated 8/27/23 at 2:13 p.m., indicated the resident was found on floor during rounds. The resident was assessed and denied any pain or discomfort. The IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) note, dated 8/28/23 at 12:06 p.m., indicated the resident had a fall on 8/27/23 and denied any pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen concentrator filters were applied and maintained for 6 of 18 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents 33, 35, 56, 170, 171, and 49). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 33 was reviewed on 3/9/23 at 12:55 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, copd (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) with acute exacerbation, malignant neoplasm of upper lobe, left bronchus or lung, emphysema, and anxiety disorder. The physician's order, dated 10/4/22, indicated staff were to change the resident's oxygen tubing and humidity, and clean the concentrator and filter once a day on Sunday. The care plan, dated 10/5/22 and last revised on 1/21/23, indicated the resident was at risk for impaired gas exchange related to the COPD with shortness of breath while lying flat, decreased mobility, opioid use, emphysema, and lung cancer. The interventions, dated 10/5/22, indicated staff were to administer oxygen as ordered at 4 L (liters) via NC (nasal cannula), and to monitor the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen, dry storage room and equipment were clean and in good repair during 3 of 3 kitchen observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 66 of 67 residents who received meals in the facility. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen, on 3/8/23 at 9:17 a.m., the following concerns were observed: -There was various food debris, one straw, a sugar packet, an ink pen, and built up brown grime on the floor under the two compartment sink counter. -There was a heavy accumulation of black dust on the expanders of two window unit air conditioners above the prep counter. There was duct tape and foam which was poorly secured around the border of the air conditioners and a heavy draft of cold air could be felt coming in. - There was heavy gray dust and brown streaks of grease running down the wall beside the outlet next to the prep counter. - Inside the dry storage there were crumpled creamer packets by and under the ice machine. There was a silver tumbler and a styrofoam…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $717K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN