Creekside Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 258 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 117 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 92.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff accurately administered physician ordered medications and treatments for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for standards of care. (Residents 1 and 18)Finding includes:1. During an observation on 3/25/2025 at 2:22 P.M. Resident 1's oxygen concentrator was dirty and dusty. The filter on the back of the concentrator had a clump of dust clinging to it. A record review for Resident 1 was completed on 3/27/2026 at 8:40 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema. Physician Orders, initiated on 3/12/2024 for Resident 1 included, but were not limited to, change oxygen tubing, change humidity, clean oxygen concentrator, and clean filter once a day on Sundays. A Medication Administration Record for Resident 1, dated March 2026, showed the oxygen tubing and humidity, and the oxygen concentrator and filter were documented as having been cleaned as indicated by staff initials on: -3/1/2026 initialed as completed by QMA 3. -3/8/2026 initialed as completed by QMA 3.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatments to address a skin condition were administered for 1 of 1 reisdents reviewed for skin conditions. (Resident 18)Findings included:The clinical record of Resident 18 was reviewed on 3/30/2026 at 10:33 A.M. The resident's diagnoses included, but were no limited to: Parkinson's disease, cellulitis of right lower limb, urinary tract infection, lymphedema, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, muscle weakness, hypertension, pemphigus foliaceous, presence of pacemaker and personal history of other venous thrombosis and embolism. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/11/26, indicated Resident 18 was moderately cognitively impaired. Physician Orders included, but were not limited to: Eucerin Original (lanolin-mineral oil), dated 3/25/2026, lotion; was to be applied twice daily to dry skin and Hydrocortisone Ointment: 2.5 % strength, dated 3/25/2026, was to be applied to face, legs and lower abdomen (not the folds) for redness twice a day.A March Medication Administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide oxygen according to the standards of practice regarding changing oxygen tubing and cleaning the oxygen concentrator and filter for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents 1 and 61)Findings include: 1. During an observation on [DATE] at 2:22 P.M. Resident 1's oxygen concentrator was found to be dirty and dusty. The filter on the back of the concentrator had a clump of dust clinging to it. A record review for Resident 1 was completed on [DATE] at 8:40 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema. Physician Orders, initiated on [DATE] for Resident 1 included, but were not limited to, oxygen at 2 liters per minute every shift, change oxygen tubing, humidity, clean oxygen concentrator, and clean filter once a day on Sundays. A Medication Administration Record for Resident 1, dated [DATE], indicated oxygen tubing was changed and the concentrator and filters were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a monitor medications for 1 of 5 residents whose medications were reviewed. (Resident 3)Finding includes:Resident 3's record review was completed on 3/27/2026 at 9:15 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: dementia, major depressive disorder, morbid obesity, congestive heart failure, hypothyroidism and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Review of the physician's orders for medications for Resident 3 indicated the resident was to receive the following diabetic medications: Freestyle [NAME] insulin 5 units three times a day, Jardiance 10 mg tablet once daily and Insulin Glargine 20 units sq once a day. In addition, the resident was receiving the following medication to address thyroid issues: Levothyroxine 100 mcg once daily. A Physician's order, dated 3/20/2026, indicated Resident 3 had a blood laboratory order to have his hemoglobin A1C (measures average blood sugar levels) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (measures thyroid levels)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-31 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an order for oral surgery was transcribed timely and followed timely for 1 of 19 residents who were reviewed. (Resident 3)Finding includes:During an interview on 3/25/2026 at 11:19 A.M., Resident 3 indicated he was scheduled for oral extractions for that day, but the procedure had been cancelled because the facility had not held his medication. Resident 3's record review was completed on 3/27/2026 at 9:15 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: dementia, major depressive disorder, morbid obesity, congestive heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Pre-Surgical Procedure/Surgery Instructions from a local oral surgery center dated, 3/10/2026, indicated Resident 3 was scheduled for oral surgery on 3/25/2026. The instructions indicated the facility was to hold the resident's scheduled doses of Jardiance four days prior to his surgery.A current Physician's order dated, 10/17/2024, indicated Resident 3 had been receiving 10 mg tablet of Jardiance once a day.A review of Resident 3's March 2026 Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a controlled narcotic medication was either secured in a locked environment or under direct observation of the staff member administering the medication for 1 of 1 residents observed for medication administration and safety. (Resident D) Finding includes: During an observation and interview on 3/21/2025 at 10:11 A.M., Resident D had a breakfast tray and a disposable scouffle cup of medications on his bedside table by the foot of the bed. He indicated they always left his pills on his table and there was a pain pill in the cup for him. During an interview on 3/21/2025 at 10:56 A.M., LPN 2 indicated Resident D had refused his medication and he plamned to go back later to see if Resident D had taken them. He identified the medications in the cup as the following: Eliquis 2.5 mg(milligrams) (blood thinner), tamsulosin 0.4 mg (prostate), lexapro 5 mg and 10 mg (antidepressant), daily-vite (vitamin) hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 mg (narcotic pain medication) and mucinex 600 mg (expectorant). He indicated he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure individual and group activities were provided per individual preferences for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for activities (Resident 11). Finding includes: During an observation, on 1/07/2025 at 11:00 A.M. Resident 11 was observed gazing off into the distance while seated in her reclining gerichair. Resident 11's chair had been placed was in the living room area of nursing pod in front of a television. The television was on, but Resident 11 was not watching the television. There was no other activity being provided that included Resident 11. During an observation on 1/08/2025 at 9:34 A.M., Resident 11 was seated in her reclining gerichair in front of the television in the living room area of the nursing pod. Resident 11 was not looking at the television during the observation nor was she involved in any type of activity program. During an observation on 1/09/2025 at 10:20 A.M., Resident 11 was observed seated in her reclining gerichair in the living room area of the nursing pod. She was noted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident's skin or notify the Physician of the need for a treatment timely for 1 of 3 residents who were reviewed for a skin condition (Resident 30). Finding includes: During observations on the following dates, Resident 30 had multiple scratches across the top of his head in various stages of healing. Six of the scratches had thick scabs covering part of the scratches: 1/7/2024 at 11:07 A.M., 1/8/2024 at 2:06 P.M. and 1/9/2024 at 9:35 A.M. During an interview with CNA 7, completed on 1/9/2025 at 9:43 A.M., she indicated Resident 30's scratches on the top of his head were from the resident scratching himself. CNA 7 indicated Resident 30 refused nail care often and it was the family's preference that the family provided Resident 30's nail care. Resident 30's record review was completed on 1/9/2025 at 10:50 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, cerebral palsy, schizophrenia, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain an admission weight and weekly weights of a newly admitted resident that resulted in an undetermined weight loss for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for a weight loss (Resident 62). Finding includes: During an interview on 1/8/2025 at 1:15 P.M., the family of Resident 62 indicated they were worried about the resident's weight because it appeared to the family the resident was losing weight. Resident 62's record review was completed on 1/9/2025 at 3:00 P.M. She was admitted on [DATE] and her diagnoses included, but were not limited to: fracture of left femur, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, hypertension and abnormal weight loss. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated , 11/27/2024, indicated Resident 62 did not have a swallowing problem, required supervision for meals and weighed 125 pounds. Resident 62's record lacked documentation that she had been weighed upon admission. A Nutrition Observation form was completed by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to enternal feedings and water flushes for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a gastronomy tube (G-tube) (Resident 27). Finding includes: During an observation on 1/7/2025 at 1:40 P.M., a bottle of Jevity 1.5 (enteral therapy) was disconnected from Resident 27 and hanging on an intravenous line (IV) pole. The bottle of Jevity 1.5 was dated 1/6/2024 and had 200 milliliters (mLs) left in the bottle. During an observation on 1/8/2025 at 10:40 A.M., a bottle of Jevity 1.5 was disconnected from Resident 27 and hanging on an IV pole. The bottle of Jevity 1.5 was dated 1/7/2024 and had 75 mLs remaining in the bottle. During an observation on 1/10/25 at 8:40 A.M., a bottle of Jevity 1.5 was disconnected from Resident 27 and was hanging on an IV pole with 225 mLs still remaining in the bottle. The date on the bottle was 1/9/2024. During an interview on 1/10/2025 at 8:41 A.M., LPN 5 indicated there was 225 mLs remaining in the bottle of Jevity 1.5 and it was normal for Resident 27 to have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN