Forest Creek Village
525 E Thompson Rd, Indianapolis, IN 46227 · For profit - Corporation · 110 certified beds · (317) 787-8253 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
- a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.8% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.7% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 54.5% | 25.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.2% | 3.9% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.3% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 37.3% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 25.8% | 95.4% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 3.6% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.2% | 23.3% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.1% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 68.9% | 79.0% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.2%CMS range 30.1–61.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.1–17.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 4.2–16.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.14 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 89.8 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to reflect only the accurate code status for 2 of 24 residents reviewed for care plan accuracy. (Resident 4, Resident 62)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 3/8/26 at 12:50 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and type 2 diabetes.An active physician's order, with a start date of 7/1/25 and with no stop date, indicated that Resident 4's code status was DNR (Do Not Resuscitate).An Indiana Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form, signed and dated by the resident's representative and the physician on 3/13/25, indicated Resident 4 had elected a DNR code status.A care plan, dated 6/25/25, regarding Resident 4 as a new admission to the facility included an approach with a start date of 6/25/25 which stated, Honor resident wishes including discharge goal: LTC, code status: full code.A care plan, dated 7/1/25, stated, Resident/legal representative has formulated an advanced directive: DNR.2. The clinical record for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed to self-administer his own medications prior to leaving the resident's medication in his room unsupervised for 1 of 3 random observations. (Resident B) Findings include:On 1/15/26 at 8:08 a.m., observed two pill cups sitting on Resident B's dresser. One pill cup with Resident B's name written on the side contained an unmarked small white pill. The other pill cup was not labeled with a name and contained a large piece of candy, an unmarked small white pill, a yellow capsule, and a large white tablet. During an interview on 1/15/26 at 8:15 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 opened the medication cart and compared the pills in the cups to Resident B's medications and indicated the medications belonged to Resident B. The small white pill was melatonin (prescription medication used to treat insomnia) 5 milligrams (mg), the yellow capsule was gabapentin (prescription medication used to treat nerve pain) 300 mg, and the large white tablet was gabapentin 600 mg. LPN 1 indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean sanitary environment was provided for 3 of 3 random resident rooms observed. Urinals were left on the floor, soiled paper products were left in a trash can without a trash bag, toilets were dirty and leaking. (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER]) Findings include: 1. On 1/15/26 at 8:08 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed. A full closed urinal sitting on the floor with dark yellow urine inside was observed. The window side of the room was cluttered with personal belongings sitting along the wall. At that time, Resident B indicated the full urinal had been sitting on the floor for a couple days.During an interview on 1/15/26 at 8:15 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 indicated Resident B's urinal should have been emptied and not left sitting on the floor. 2. On 1/15/26 at 8:25 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed. In the bathroom, there was a strong odor of urine and feces. Dried feces on the rim of the toilet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program when pests were observed in a residents rooms for 2 of 3 rooms observed. (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER]) Findings include:1. On 1/15/26 at 8:08 a.m., inside room [ROOM NUMBER], observed a dresser with a meal tray sitting on top that had dried peas, potatoes, and an open chocolate pudding cup. A small roach-like insect was observed to be crawling out of the peas. At that time, Resident B indicated he hadn't seen a roach in his room in approximately a week, and the meal tray was from dinner the previous night. A Pest Control Report, dated 10/27/25 at 2:22 p.m., indicated cockroaches were noted during service in resident rooms and hallways. Access for service was limited due to clutter and stored items. Most resident rooms had too much clutter to actually service. Please remove or store items to allow access for service. 2. On 1/15/26 at 8:17 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed. In the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from mental abuse when a staff member took a picture of a cognitively impaired resident and posted the picture on a social media website for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B, Activity Assistant) Findings include:On 12/16/25 at 8:48 a.m., the Administrator provided a copy of a facility reportable incident, dated 11/26/25 at 9:21 p.m. A review of the reportable incident indicated Resident B's picture had been posted online by an activity assistant that worked in the facility.During an interview on 12/16/25 at 10:40 a.m., the Administrator indicated an Activity Assistant posted a picture of Resident B online. The Activity Assistant was terminated because she violated a facility policy. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 12/16/25 at 10:42 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, delusional disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. Resident B was severely cognitively impaired and resided on the secured memory care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was served in a sanitary environment for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. The kitchen floors were dirty. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 6/23/25 from 8:26 a.m. until 8:32 a.m., observed buildup of an unknown dark substance, dust, debris, a screwdriver, and several plastic lids under a freezer of the main kitchen area. A buildup of dust and debris under the shelves in the dry storage room was observed. At that time, the dietary supervisor indicated the floors under the freezer and in the dry storage room should have been cleaned. On 6/24/25 at 11:45 a.m., the Director of Nursing provided a copy of a facility policy, titled Cleaning Floors, Tables, and Chairs, dated 7/2015, and indicated this was the current policy used by the facility. A review of the policy indicated kitchen floors will be kept clean and sanitary. This citation relates to Complaint IN00461884. 3.1-21(i)(2) 3.1-21(i)(3)
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure person-centered care plan interventions were implemented for a resident with a high risk for a falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident B) Findings include: On 6/23/25 at 11:08 a.m., observed Resident B's lying in bed. The bed was approximately two feet from the floor, not in the lowest position. At that time, Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 1 entered Resident B's room and indicated the bed should not have been left that high. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/23/25 at 9:29 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure, diabetes, and respiratory failure. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/4/25, indicated Resident B was moderately cognitively impaired and had a history of two or more falls with one injury while a resident at the facility. A care plan, dated 3/6/25, indicated Resident B was at risk for falls. The interventions included, but were not limited to, bed in lowest position. A current physician's order,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received meals that were palatable and at a proper temperature for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for palatability and proper temperature of food. (Resident C, Resident D) Findings include: On 6/23/25 at 8:35 a.m. until 8:45 a.m., observed a metal cart sitting in the hallway with a meal tray for Resident C. At that time, CNA 2 indicated the meal trays had been delivered to the hall at approximately 8:30 a.m. and then CNA 2 walked away from the cart. On 6/23/25 at 8:50 a.m., observed CNA 1 remove a meal tray for Resident C and deliver it to Resident C's room. CNA 1 removed the lid from the plate and asked Resident C to let him know if she needed anything else. CNA 1 left Resident C's room. On 6/23/25 at 8:51 a.m. observed Resident C try to cut a sausage link on her plate with a fork but was not able to do so. Resident C had a frustrated look on her face and tasted the scrambled eggs. At that time, Resident C indicated she rarely received hot food because the food sat in the hallway. Resident C…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (the use of gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities for residents that are at increased risk to transfer or become infected with multi-drug resistant organisms) were implemented for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident B) Findings include: On 6/23/25 at 8:58 a.m., observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 and CNA 1 transferring Resident B to the bed with a mechanical lift. Hanging on the door inside Resident B's room, personal protective equipment was observed with individually wrapped plastic gowns, gloves, and masks. Once Resident B was transferred to bed, observed LPN 1 hang Resident B's urinary catheter bag on the bed frame below the mattress. LPN 1 was wearing gloves but no gown and CNA 1 was not wearing gloves nor gown. During an interview on 6/23/25 at 9:14 a.m., CNA 1 indicated staff should have been wearing a gown and gloves when transferring Resident B. The clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment for the residents for 1 of 1 random observations. Findings include: During the initial tour of the 100 Hall on 6/23/25 from 8:30 a.m. until 8:35 a.m., observed buildup of an unknown black substance along the floorboards and the floorboard trim throughout the 100 hall. On 6/23/25 at 11:30 a.m., observed approximately six inches of the black substance along the floorboards and the floor trim be scraped up. The substance was thick, black, and tar like with hair and other debris mixed with it. At that time the Director of Nursing indicated that should have been scraped up when the housekeeper cleaned the floor. During an interview on 6/23/25 at 11:41 a.m., the Housekeeping Supervisor indicated the floors are cleaned daily and the staff should be scraping the buildup off the floor at that time. On 6/24/25 at 12:10 p.m., the facility was unable to provide a policy by survey exit. This citation relates to Complaints IN00461884 and IN00461240. 3.1-19(f)
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a self medication administration assessment was completed for 1 of 1 residents observed with medications at the bedside. (Resident C) Findings include: On 5/20/25 at 8:36 a.m., observed a small pill cup with a round brown tablet sitting on Resident C's bedside table. Resident C was resting in bed. During an interview on 5/20/25 at 8:37 a.m., LPN 2 indicated the brown tablet was senna (medication used to treat constipation) 8.6 milligrams (mg) and should not have been left in Resident C's room. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 5/20/25 at 9:43 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes and metabolic encephalopathy. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/28/25, indicated Resident C had minimum cognitive impairment. The clinical record lacked a self medication administration assessment. During an interview on 5/21/25 at 12:45 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated there was no self medication administration assessment completed for Resident C. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed for a resident that was admitted with an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of the MDS assessment. (Resident F) Findings include: The clinical record was reviewed for Resident F on 5/20/25 at 11:50 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, neurogenic bladder, severe morbid obesity, and diabetes. An admission Observation, dated 3/28/25, indicated Resident F was admitted with an indwelling urinary catheter An admission MDS assessment, dated 4/4/25, indicated Resident F did not have an indwelling urinary catheter when he was admitted . A physician's order, initiated on 3/28/25 and discontinued on 4/10/25, indicated Resident F had an indwelling urinary catheter. During an interview on 5/21/25 at 9:25 a.m., RN 1 indicated Resident F's MDS assessment should have indicated he had an indwelling urinary catheter. On 5/21/25 at 12:58 p.m., reviewed the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, dated 10/2023. A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing had been changed, a nebulizer machine was cleaned, and the nebulizer tubing was changed for 3 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident B, Resident D, Resident E) Findings include: 1. On 5/20/25 at 8:43 a.m., Resident B's nebulizer machine (small machine used to administer liquid inhalation medications) was observed to be stained a purplish color and dusty. The nebulizer machine was sitting on the floor next to the heating unit under the window. A clear tube extended from the nebulizer machine up and connected to a clear face mask shaped to fit over the nose and mouth with a small chamber to hold the liquid inhalation solution. The nebulizer face mask was not in a bag but was lying directly on the heating unit. The nebulizer face mask was dated 4/13/25. During an interview on 5/20/25 at 8:51 a.m., LPN 1 indicated a nebulizer machine should not have been placed on the floor and oxygen tubing, the nebulizer tubing, and mask should have been changed weekly. The clinical record for Resident B was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prescription medications were secured for 2 of 2 random observations. Two prescription medications were sitting on top of an unlocked medication cart in a high traffic resident area unsupervised by staff; and two vials of a prescription aerosol medication were sitting in a resident's room who was not prescribed the aerosol medication. (Resident B) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 5/20/25 at 8:05 a.m., observed the west 200 hall medication cart to be unlocked and sitting against the wall near the nurses station. There was no staff supervising the medication cart. On top of the medication cart, observed a white plastic bottle labeled H-Chlor12 0.125% (prescription wound cleanser used to prevent infection) with approximately two ounces of solution remaining in the bottle and a full plastic bottle labeled lactulose (prescription medication used to treat hepatic encephalopathy and constipation) 10 grams (gm)/15 milliliters (ml) solution. During an interview on 5/20/25 at 8:07 a.m., LPN 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was complete and accurate for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for documentation. (Resident B, Resident F) Findings include: 1. On 5/20/25 at 8:43 a.m., observed Resident B's dirty nebulizer machine (small machine used to administer liquid inhalation medications) sitting on the floor next to the heat unit under the window. A clear tube extended from the nebulizer machine up and connected to a clear face mask shaped to fit over the nose and mouth with a small chamber to hold the liquid inhalation solution. The nebulizer face mask was not in a bag but was lying directly on the heat unit. The nebulizer face mask was dated 4/13/25. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 5/20/25 at 10:37 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, dementia, and morbid obesity. The current physician's orders indicated: - Ipratropium-albuterol (prescription medication used to help breathe more easily) 0.5 milligrams (mg)/3 milliliters (ml) inhalation solution administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for infection control. A nebulizer machine and tubing were not maintained in a sanitary manner, a catheter bag was on the floor, and soiled linens, and a brief were not disposed of in a sanitary manner. (Resident B, Resident E, Resident F) Findings include: 1. On 5/20/25 at 8:43 a.m., observed Resident B's dirty nebulizer machine (small machine used to administer liquid inhalation medications) sitting on the floor next to the heat unit under the window. A clear tube extended from the nebulizer machine up and connected to a clear face mask shaped to fit over the nose and mouth with a small chamber to hold the liquid inhalation solution. The nebulizer face mask was not in a bag but was lying directly on the heat unit. The nebulizer face mask was dated 4/13/25. During an interview on 5/20/25 at 8:51 a.m., LPN 1 indicated Resident B's nebulizer machine should not have been placed on the floor and should have been cleaned. The nebulizer mask…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from roaches for 1 of 1 random observations. Finding includes: On 5/20/25 at 9:09 a.m., observed a brown cockroach crawling on the floor outside a resident's room. At that time, Resident H indicated he had seen a roach near his door. On 5/21/25 at 8:15 a.m., the Administrator provided a copy of a facility policy, titled Pest Control, dated 9/2023, and indicated this was the current policy used by the facility. A review of the policy indicated the facility will maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free from pests. This citation relates to Complaint IN00458615 3.1-19(f)(4)
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of a medication error rate greater than 5 percent for 4 of 25 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 16 percent. Resident B , Resident C) Findings include: 1. On 3/14/25 at 7:23 a.m., observed RN 1 administer Wixela 250/50 micrograms (mcg) (prescription metered dose inhaler used to treat asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and Incruse Ellipta 62.5 mcg (prescription metered dose inhaler used to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) to Resident B. RN 1 did not ask Resident B to rinse her mouth with water and spit the water out before RN 1 left Resident B's room. At that time, RN 1 indicated he had finished administering Resident B's medications. RN 1 didn't need to have Resident B rinse her mouth and spit after he administered Wixela nor Incruse. The instructions for use for Wixela 250/50 mcg were reviewed on 3/14/25 at 9:00 a.m. A review of the instructions indicated rinse mouth with water after breathing in the medicine. Spit out the water. Do…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure self-administration medication assessments were complete for 1 of 1 residents observed with medications at the bedside. (Resident E). Findings include: On 3/14/25 at 8:09 a.m., observed a small purple pill, a small white pill, and a yellow capsule sitting inside a small plastic medication cup on Resident E's bedside table. There was no staff in Resident E's room. During an interview on 3/14/25 at 8:25 a.m., LPN 1 indicated the three pills that were left in the plastic cup on Resident E's bedside table should not have been left in his room. On 3/14/25 at 9:29 a.m. Resident E's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes and thyroid disorder. The clinical record lacked a self-administration medication assessment. On 3/14/25 at 12:10 p.m., the DON indicated Resident E did not have a self-administration medication assessment and the medications should not have been left at the bedside. On 3/14/25 at 9:15 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) provided a copy of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were dated when opened for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. (200 Hall Medication Cart) Findings include: On 3/14/25 at 7:23 a.m., observed Wixela 250/50 mcg (micrograms) (prescription inhaler used for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) sitting inside a clear baggy in the top drawer of the 200 hall medication cart. The label on the Wixela inhaler indicated Resident B, 60 doses were filled, on 1/22/25, and 47 doses remained. There was no opened date written anywhere on the inhaler package nor the inhaler itself. A Lantus Solostar 100 unit/ml (milliliter) insulin pen was observed sitting in the top drawer of the medication cart. The seal was broken on the Lantus Solostar insulin pen. There was no opened date written anywhere on the Lantus Solostar label nor on the insulin pen itself. During an interview on 3/14/25 at 7:47 a.m., RN (Registered Nurse) 1 indicated the Lantus Solostar insulin pen and the Wixela inhaler should have been dated when they were opened. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices for 1 of 1 random observations. Staff did not perform hand hygiene prior to putting on and taking off gloves and did not remove gloves prior to exiting the room. (Resident D, LPN 1) Findings include: On 3/14/25 at 7:58 a.m., observed LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 1 walk into Resident D's room holding two insulin pens. LPN 1 told Resident D she was going to administer his insulin. LPN 1 put on a pair of clean gloves and administered the insulin to Resident D. No hand hygiene was observed. Then LPN 1 walked out of Resident D's room and removed the dirty gloves. At that time, LPN 1 indicated she should have performed hand hygiene before she put on the gloves and after she removed the gloves. LPN 1 should have removed the gloves before she left Resident D's room. On 3/14/25 at 9:15 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) provided a copy of a skills competency, titled Insulin Pen Administration, dated 10/2019, and indicated this was the current skills competency used by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure potentially hazardous materials were kept secure behind locked doors to prevent resident's access to the materials for 2 of 2 observations. Finding included: On 1/27/25 at 9:05 a.m., observed the door to the Soiled Utility Room on the west hall across from the laundry room to be unlocked with no staff in the immediate area. In the room, four full sharps containers were observed. One sharps container was not secured and was lying on its side with used needles exposed. During an interview on 1/27/25 at 9:10 a.m., the Maintenance Director indicated that the door to the Soiled Utility Room was supposed to be locked. During an observation on 1/27/25 at 10:00 a.m., the door to Soiled Utility Room was observed to be unlocked with no staff in the area. During an interview on 1/27/25 at 10:11 a.m., Director of Nursing (DON), indicated that the door was supposed to be locked. On 1/27/25 at 10:52 a.m., the DON provided, a copy of American Senior Communities Policy title: Bloodborne Pathogens Exposure Control Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document the drug dispositions for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for drug disposition. (Resident 295, Resident 91) Findings included: 1. On 1/29/25 at 10:35 a.m., the clinical record of Resident 295 was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease and transient cerebral ischemic attack. A physician's order summary report of medications, dated for active orders as of 6/16/24, included, but were not limited to: - Eliquis 6 mg (milligrams) for transient cerebral ischemic attack - Norvasc 10 mg for hypertension - Vitamin D3 for vitamin D deficiency A progress note, dated 12/27/24 at 3:04 p.m., indicated Resident 295 was transferred to another facility along with her medications. Resident 295's clinical record lacked documentation listing any name, type, or amount of medications that were sent home with the resident or resident's representative. During an interview on 1/29/25 at 10:50 a.m., the Regional Director of Nursing indicated that the facility lacked documentation for drug dispositions for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0659 — isolatedProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a staff member (QMA 2) followed pain medication administration protocols by administering a controlled substance on the wrong day at the wrong time for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pain medications. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 10/24/24 at 9:00 a.m., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, respiratory failure, COPD (a lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), opioid dependence, and hepatitis C (a viral infection that affects the liver). A physician's order report, dated 9/1/24 to 10/24/24 indicated: Fentanyl (a potent synthetic schedule II controlled opioid drug given for pain relief) was prescribed on 9/26/24 with a stop date of 9/29/24. Staff were to apply the 12 mcg (micrograms) Fentanyl transdermal patch once every three days and to rotate the site of application. A new physician order, dated 9/29/24 with no end date, indicated apply Fentanyl 12 mcg transdermal patch every three days and rotate the site. The old patch was to be removed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were served in a sanitary and safe manner for 3 of 4 kitchen observations. Staff hair was not covered while in the kitchen food preparation area. (Cook 5, Dietary Staff 6) Findings include: 1. During the initial kitchen observation on 2/11/24 from 9:35 a.m. to 9:45 a.m., observed [NAME] 5 walking throughout the kitchen area. [NAME] 5 had hair pulled from the front to the back of the head and hair in front of and behind the ears. The hair was observed to not be covered. 2. During a follow up kitchen observation on 2/11/24 from 12:20 p.m. to 12:30 p.m., the following was observed: - [NAME] 5 was working at the steam table where the noon meal was being held. [NAME] 5 was observed obtaining the noon meal starting temperatures. [NAME] 5's hair was pulled from the front to the back of the head and hair in front of and behind the ears. The hair was not observed to be covered. - Dietary Aide 6 was observed walking throughout the kitchen area and at the steam table where the noon meal was being held.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an Advanced Directive (code status) preference was documented accurately in the clinical record for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. (Resident 196) Finding includes: On 2/12/24 at 8:50 a.m., Resident 196's clinical record was reviewed. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 1/28/24, indicated Resident 196 was moderately cognitive impaired. The main screen tab portion of the electronic clinical record included an overview of Resident 196's vital information. A review of the tab indicated Resident 196's Advanced Directive (code status - decision regarding health care intervention) as DNR (Do Not Attempt Resuscitation - meaning no desire for life sustaining measures to be implemented). The Physician Orders, dated 1/24/24 and with no end date noted, indicated Resident 196 was a full code (desire for all life sustaining measures to be implemented). Resident 196's care plan, start date: 2/5/24 and valid through 6/27/24, indicated .problem: Resident/legal representative has formulated an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurate for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospice. (Resident 32) Finding includes: On 2/12/24 at 1:46 p.m., the clinical record of Resident 32 was reviewed. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dementia. The Physician's Orders included, but were not limited, admit to hospice services due to dementia, initiated 3/27/23, with no end date was noted. Resident 32's care plan included, but was not limited to, .start date 3/1/23 problem: Resident requires hospice R/T [related to] progressing dementia .target date 2/27/24 goal: advanced directive wishes will be honored .approach: resident requires hospice R/T progressing dementia . The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/6/24, indicated Resident 32 was severely cognitive impaired and was not receiving hospice services. The Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/14/23, indicated Resident 32 was severely cognitive impaired and was not receiving hospice services. During an interview on 2/13/24 at 9:30 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to ensure a gastrostomy site dressing was changed for a resident with a g-tube used for enteral feedings for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for gastrostomy services. (Resident B) Findings included: During an interview on 2/12/24 at 10:48 a.m., Resident B indicated the facility had not changed his gastrostomy tube (g-tube) dressing recently. Resident B indicated the facility had not changed the dressing daily like they are supposed to. During an observation on 2/11/24 at 1:00 p.m., observed Resident B's g-tube dressing to be undated. During an observation on 2/12/24 at 10:30 a.m., observed Resident B's g-tube dressing to be undated. During an observation on 2/13/24 at 11:00 a.m., observed Resident B's g-tube dressing to be undated. During an interview on 2/13/24 at 11:15 a.m., LPN 3 indicated Resident B's g-tube dressing should have been dated after each dressing change. On 2/11/24 at 11:00 a.m., the clinical record of Resident B was reviewed. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled with an open date for 1 of 3 medication carts observed. (Moving Forward/Split Cart) Finding includes: On 2/13/24 at 8:50 a.m., the Moving Forward/Split Cart was observed. In the cart, three opened vials of Insulin Lispro (a short acting medication to treat Diabetes Mellitus) 100 units/ml (milliliter) and one opened Insulin Glargine (a long acting medication to treat Diabetes Mellitus) Flex Pen 100 units/ml were observed. The vials and Flex Pen were not labeled to indicate the date the medication was opened. During an interview at that time, LPN 8 indicated the vials should have been dated at the time they were opened. On 2/13/24 at 10:24 a.m., the Director of Nursing provided a policy titled, Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals, dated January 2002, and indicated it was the current policy being used by the facility. A review of the policy indicated 5. Once any medication or biological package is opened; Facility should follow manufacturer or supplier…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately and completely document services provided for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for catheter care. (Resident 88) Findings include: On 2/11/24 at 1:20 p.m., Resident 88 was observed resting in bed. An indwelling urinary catheter (a medical device that helps drain urine from the bladder) was connected to the catheter tubing which was connected to the catheter drainage bag (a medical bag that held urine) was observed. On 2/14/24 at 9:22 a.m. Resident 88's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, malignant neoplasm of prostate (prostate cancer); neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (urinary condition where people lack bladder control); and urine retention (difficulty urinating and completely emptying the bladder). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/25/24, indicated Resident 88 was moderately cognitively intact and had an indwelling urinary catheter. Resident 88's care plan indicated .Problem start date: 11/20/23 .Resident requires an indwelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-02-15 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the posted nurse staffing included the actual worked by nursing hours and was updated daily for 3 of 5 days observed during the survey. Findings included. On 2/11/24 at 8:45 a.m., the Staff Posting Report, dated 2/9/24, was observed in the front lobby. The posted Staff Nursing Hours were observed to not indicate the actual hours worked and was not observed to be updated to the current date (2/11/24). On 2/12/24 at 8:30 a.m., the Staff Posting Report was observed to not indicate the actual hours worked. On 2/13/24 at 10:33 a.m., the Staff Posting Report was observed to not indicate the actual hours worked. During an interview at that time RN 2 indicated the only posted nursing hours were kept in the front of the facility in the main lobby. During an interview on 2/13/24 at 10:45 a.m., the Director of Nursing indicated she was not aware the actual worked hours were to be listed on the posted Staff Nursing Hours. On 2/13/24 at 11:00 a.m., the Director of Nursing provided a policy titled Posted Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 89 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 89; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DRUMMER, CARL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2017 |
| HANIFY, THOMAS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2022 |
| HORN, BRENDA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 12/01/2023 |
| LAZARD, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/29/2021 |
| MANTRAVADI, GEETA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 07/21/2021 |
| PAYNE, MONICA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 08/09/2021 |
| BABCOCK, PAUL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/30/2020 |
| CAINE, VIRGINIA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/10/1994 |
| HARRIS, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/22/2003 |
| AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2003 |
| DICE, MARK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2023 |
| PATEL, NEHA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/15/2026 |
| SMITH, DANIELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| SWEENY, BRENDAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2024 |
| VAN CAMP, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155241. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.