Eagle Valley Meadows
3017 Valley Farms Rd, Indianapolis, IN 46214 · For profit - Corporation · 114 certified beds · (317) 293-2555 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.4% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.6% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 50.7% | 25.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.2% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.7% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 34.1% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.3% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.7% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.1% | 23.3% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.2% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.4% | 79.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 10.3% | 22.2% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.9% | 10.8% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 78.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.6%CMS range 37.3–71.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 8.0–17.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 78.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 78.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 67.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 6.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.05 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 79.1 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment on 3 of 4 hallways observed for cleanliness (Hallways A, B, and D). Findings include: 1. On 11/24/25 Resident CC's family member e-mailed the Executive Director (ED) requesting a deep cleaning of the resident's bathroom. The e-mail indicated during a visit the resident's room and bathroom floors were filthy, and she was requesting they be cleaned. During the initial tour of Hallway D the following was observed: a. On 12/8/25 at 10:58 a.m., Resident D was observed propped in a bed positioned against the wall, watching videos on her cellphone, and the television on but muted. There was a large area of dried dark substances on the wall near the resident's head. On 12/9/25 at 10:38 a.m. a second observation was made of Resident D's room. The large area of dried dark substances remained on the wall near the resident's head. b. On 12/8/25 at 11:05 a.m., Resident E was observed sitting on the side of the bed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respond to call lights for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dependent residents call light response times (Residents B and L). Findings include:1. On 12/8/25 at 12/8/25 at 12:12 p.m., Resident B was observed sitting in a manual wheelchair (WC) in her room and indicated she had been waiting for 15 minutes for staff to come change her wet brief. The resident's call light was observed not to be activated, and she indicated staff had shut the light off and told her they would return. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) 8 and 9 were observed in the hallway passing lunch trays, but they were not observed to enter the resident's room or speak to her. Resident B reactivated her call light. On 12/8/25 at 12:16 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 13 was observed entering Resident B's room, she turned the call light off, left the room, and returned to the nurse's station. On 12/8/25 at 12:27 p.m., Resident B was observed sitting in the same position…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to date items when opened and prepped for 1 of 1 kitchen observation. Findings include: On 7/27/25 at 10:02 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted. Observed a cell phone lying next to pies that were defrosting. [NAME] and chocolate milk had no date opened on the containers. A salad was prepped with no date on the wrap.On 7/27/25 at 10:30a.m., the cook indicated the milk should have had a date open on the container.A policy titled, Food Storage was provided by the Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCS) on 7/30/25 at 11:30 a.m. It indicated, .All foods shall be covered or wrapped tightly, labeled and dated.3.1-21(j)(1)3.1-21(j)(3)
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents residing in the Memory Care (MC) unit for 6 days of observations and 4 of 4 months of grievances reviewed. These deficiencies had the potential to lead to increased risk of infection, safety hazards, and an institutional rather than homelike setting for 20 of 20 residents residing in the MC unit.Findings include: 1.On 7/27/25 at 10:38 a.m., an Air Conditioning (AC) unit mounted to the wall in the MC front lounge was observed actively dripping water from built up condensation. The water leaked down the wall, and dripped on top of a cushioned chair. The paint on the wall under the AC unit was observed to peel away and showed evidence of long-term water damage. On 7/29/25 at 9:55 a.m., Resident 48 was observed as she sat in the cushioned chair under the mounted AC unit which continued to drip onto the back of the chair. During an interview on 7/30/25 at 9:45 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) such as, dressing, grooming, hygiene, toileting, and repositioning for multiple dependent residents in the Memory Care (MC) unit for 5 of 8 residents reviewed for ADLs (Residents 27, 57, 34, 58 and 56). Findings include:During an initial observation in the secured memory care unit (MC) on 7/27/25 at 10:38 a.m., the following was observed:Multiple residents were observed in the main dining/activity lounge who wore unclean, ill-fitted socks and clothing with unkempt, tangled or greasy hair.Resident 27 sat in a wheelchair (wc) which had a copious about of bright orange duct tape to the brake handles and inside panel. The tape was peeled away in several areas with bits of unidentifiable debris, hair and lint stuck to the peeled sides. Her hair had been pulled into a ponytail, but the band was loose, and her hair was falling out around it, and appeared as if she slept on it. She wore a long-sleeve purple shirt which appeared too big for her and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing was provided to meet resident care needs. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 20 of 20 residents who resided in the secured memory care unit and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for NOMNC notification. (Residents 17 and B)Findings include:1. On 7/27/25 at 11:00 a.m., the day shift time and attendance records for nursing staff assignments on the 6:00 a.m. -2:00 p.m. shift, with a resident census of 77, were reviewed. According to the timesheets, the following staff were physically present in the building during the 6-2 shift:Licensed Nurses:Registered Nurse (RN) 9: 6:52 a.m. - 2:52 p.m.Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 11: 7:45 a.m. - 11:40 a.m.LPN 12: 6:42 a.m. - 2:01 p.m.LPN 13: 5:44 a.m. - 2:13 p.m.Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs):CNA 14: 5:44 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.CNA 15: 6:01 a.m. - 2:10 p.m.CNA 16: 5:56 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.CNA 17: 6:06 a.m. - 4:12 p.m.CNA 18: 6:04 a.m. - 2:11 p.m.The total actual CNA worked hours for the 6-2 shift was 72.43 hours, resulting in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place for 4 of 4 residents randomly observed for infection control during the survey (Residents 10, 47, 20, and 34).Findings include:1. On 7/28/25 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 10 was observed resting on her right side with her eyes closed. Resident 10 had a catheter bag in a basin on the floor draining urine. There was an EBP sign on the bathroom door and a PPE cart across the hall between two rooms. On 7/28/25 at 1:35 p.m., Resident 10 was observed as she received peri care from Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 5. The CNA was wearing gloves only while providing care. On 7/29/25 at 12:04 p.m., Resident 10's medical record was reviewed. She was a long-term care resident whose diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and personal history of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection (MRSA). A care plan that was last reviewed 5/14/25 indicated Resident 10 was at risk of transferring or becoming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record accurately reflected the resident's wishes related to advance directives for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident 75). Findings include: On 8/1/25 at 9:35 a.m. Resident 75's medical record was reviewed. She was a long term care resident whose diagnoses included but were not limited to atrial flutter (a heart rhythm disorder where the heart's upper chambers beat rapidly and regularly, but not in a coordinated manner with the lower chambers) and myasthenia gravis (a chronic autoimmune disease that causes weakness in the voluntary muscles.). Resident 75 had an order for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), dated 4/15/25, with a discontinue date of 4/15/25.Resident 75 had an order for full code, dated 4/15/25 with a discontinue date of 5/9/25, when the resident was discharged . A progress note, dated 4/22/25 at 1:31 p.m., indicated social services found that the Out of Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OHDNR) paperwork was not filled out correctly. The note indicated social services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a pre and post dialysis assessment for a resident on his dialysis days for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident 40) . The deficient practice was corrected 2/20/25 and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include: On 7/29/25 at 12:43 a.m., a record review was completed for Resident 40. He had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to end stage renal disease, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety, sleep apnea, insomnia, and heart failure. Resident 40 had an order, dated 1/27/25, for dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. He was missing dialysis pre and post assessments for the following days: 2/3/25, 2/5/25, 2/7/25, 2/10/25, 2/12/25, 2/14/25, 2/17/25, 2/19/25, 2/21/25, 2/24/25, 2/26/25, 3/5/25, 3/7/25, 3/14/25, 3/17/25, 3/21/25, 3/24/25, 3/26/25, 3/28/25, and 3/31/25. Resident 40 had a care plan dated 1/27/25. It indicated Resident was receiving hemodialysis and was at risk for complications such as fluid imbalance, bleeding or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all medications and treatments were stored and labeled properly for the facility in 1 of 1 medication storage rooms and 1 of 1 medication carts reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 78 of 78 residents that resided in the facility who received medications. Findings include: On [DATE] at 9:57 a.m., the medication storage room was observed with Director of Nursing (DON). The medication storage room was observed to have a large quantity of various medications and treatments which needed to be returned. The medications were stacked and scattered throughout the room. There were two full bins which overflowed on to the counter and floor and one sink was observed to be full of medications which overflowed into the second sink. The DON stated all the medications observed came off the medication carts this week. The DON indicated one bag of medication was mixed in with the to-be-returned to pharmacy medication and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was not left at bedside without a self-medication assessment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medication self-administration (Resident B). Findings include: On 10/10/24 at 10:16 a.m., Ventolin (albuterol) and Symbicort inhalers were observed on Resident B's over the bed table. On 10/10/24 at 11:24 a.m., Resident B's self-administration assessment was reviewed. It indicated on 9/5/24, she was approved to self-administer bacitracin (topical antibiotic) to her nose. No other medications were listed to self-administer. A current policy, titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, dated 4/30/24, was provided by the DON, on 10/10/24 at 11:30 a.m., a review of the policy indicated, .Verify each time a medication is administered that it is the correct medication, at the correct dose, at the correct route, at the correct rate, at the correct time, for the correct resident This citation relates to Complaint IN00443579. 3.1-11
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, (Resident B) was comprehensively assessed for her nutritional status and person centered interventions were implemented for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: During an interview on 10/9/24 at 11:36 a.m., Resident B indicated, she did not like the food and was tired of only being able to receive hamburgers as food substitutes. She was supposed to be on a low sodium diet, but did not feel like she had been provided with a variety of options or healthier options. Resident B indicated when she asked for alternative food options, staff told her the alterative menu would also be a hamburger. Resident B indicated she had never been visited by the Registered Dietician (RD). She wanted the RD to see her, review her new low sodium diet, and give more options than just a hamburger. On 10/9/24 at 1:11 p.m., Resident B's lunch tray was observed, and the meal had been consumed. Resident B pointed to her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were competent with medication administration for 2 of 2 residents observed for medication administration (Residents B and E) Findings include: On 10/10 24 at 10:09 a.m., LPN 8 was observed at the B Hall Medication Cart. During a medication administration for Resident B, LPN 8 provided a Symbicort inhaler (treats asthma and COPD-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), the resident took a puff of the inhaler. Immediately after, LPN 8 provided albuterol (treats asthma and COPD) and Spirva (dilates bronchial passage ways) with no delay between puffs. He provided water for the resident to rinse her mouth. She swallowed the water. On 10/10/24 at 10:35 a.m., LPN 8 was observed preparing medication for Resident E. He was observed pouring 15 mL (milliliters) Robitussin (cough suppressant) into a medication cup. He was observed lifting the round cardboard from the touch of the bottle with his bare fingers. He double checked the level of medication at eye-level and indicated 15 mL. The physician's order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were provided according to the physician's order (Resident B) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: On 10/10/24 at 9:45 a.m., Resident B expressed concern about missing some of her medications. She indicated she missed her clonazepam (antianxiety) four times this week. On 10/10/24 at 11:24 a.m., Resident B's October Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed for missing medications. According to the MAR: a. Her clonazepam 1 mg, a scheduled IV tablet (controlled substance), was not given on 10/3/24 at 10:00 p.m., 10/4/24 at 2:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m., 10/7/24 at 2:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m., 10/8/24 at 10:00 p.m., and 10/9/24 at 10:00 p.m. b. Her dicyclomine tablet (for irritable bowel), 20 mg was not given on 10/3/24 at 10:00 p.m., 10/4/24 at 10:00 p.m., 10/7/24 at 10:00 p.m., 10/8/24 at 10:00 p.m., 10/9/24 at 10:00 p.m., and 10/10/24 at 8:00 a.m. c. Her dorzolamide-timolol 2-0.5 % (treat glaucoma) was not given at 7:00 p.m. on 10/3/24, 10/4/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the potential for the spread of a highly contagious virus when staff failed to perform hand hygiene and don personal protective equipment (PPE) in a COVID-19 positive isolation room for 2 of 2 days of observation. This deficient practice had the potential to effect 22 of 78 residents who resided on the D-hall of the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 10/9/24 at 11:36 a.m., Resident B indicated she was worried about catching COVID-19 because she knew staff were not using the appropriate PPE to enter isolation rooms. She indicated she often sat at the nurses station and watched as staff entered COVID-19 positive rooms and they did not put on a gown, gloves or new masks. On 10/9/24 at 1:30 p.m., Resident C's room was observed from the hallway. The door was open, but there was a bright red sign which indicated PPE was required to enter the room due to droplet isolation precautions. On 10/9/24 at 1:48 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 6 entered Resident C's room. She did not perform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the dignity and the right to refuse services of 1 of 5 residents reviewed for resident rights (Resident S). Findings include: On 8/20/24 at 11:43 a.m., during an initial observation and interview, Resident S was observed the resident lying in bed. The call light was within reach on the right side of her bed attached to her bed rail. She was on a low air loss mattress to facilitate comfort and prevent skin breakdown. The resident was cognitively intact, alert, and pleasant. The resident indicated she was able to stand and transfer to her wheelchair with assistance from the staff. She preferred to have meals in her room, but she was able to go to the dining room. The resident indicated on 8/17/24 (she was unsure of the time), she was in the lobby with her daughter, and she removed her oxygen tubing from her nose because she did not feel any air in the tube. She indicated Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 was sitting at the nurse's desk and she asked the nurse three times for help. She indicated LPN 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable environment to ensure pest control interventions were effective for 5 of 5 months of recommendations reviewed. This deficiency had the potential to affect 75 of 75 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. During a kitchen tour, on 6/2/24 at 10:47 a.m., several dozen flying insects were observed alighting from clean dishes when the clean dish shelf was slightly wiggled. On 6/2/24 at 10:48 a.m., [NAME] 16 indicated she had seen flying insects all around the kitchen. On 6/2/24 at 10:49 a.m., the Dietary Manager (DM) indicated she had seen the Maintenance Man (MM) using a vacuum device to remove the flying insects. On 6/2/24 at 10:57 a.m., the DM indicated the large tub under the 3 compartment sink was there because the sink leaked. The tub was observed with standing water. On 6/2/24 at 11:00 a.m., a wet blanket was observed around the bottom of the ice machine in the kitchen. The DM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, the facility failed to label and date medications when opened and remove expired medications from use for 2 of 4 medication carts and 1 of 1 refrigerator. Findings include: 1. A hall medication cart a. Resident 64 had a vial of Haldol in the medication cart. The vial was a one time use only and lacked a date when opened. b. Resident 2 had breo in the medication cart. It lacked a date when opened. 2. B hall medication cart a. A bottle of Systane eye drops was in the medication cart. It did not have a label on the bottle. b. Resident 226 had a bottle of Systane eye drops in the medication cart with no date to indicate when it was opened. 3. Refrigerator had the following: a. Resident 54 had 2 bottles of lorazepam in the refrigerator. One bottle lacked a date to indicate when it was opened. The other bottle was opened on 2/22/24 that had expired. b. Resident 6 had a bottle of lorazepam in the refrigerator. It lacked a date to indicate when it was opened. c. There was a bottle of lorazepam in the refrigerator. It lacked a label on the bottle. A medication storage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure linens were not contaminated for 4 of 12 residents during dining service (Resident 3, 9, 7, 21, and 46) and failed to ensure kitchen temperature logs were completed. Findings include: 1 On 6/2/24 at 12:18 p.m., the Social Services Director (SSD) was observed bringing tablecloths and clothing protectors into the dining room. She was holding them up against her body and sleeve. She indicated she was just making sure everyone had tablecloths and clothing protectors. On 6/2/24 at 12:20 p.m., the SSD was observed putting a table cloths on a table while Resident 9 was sitting at the table, then she provided him with a clothing protector. On 6/2/24 at 12:23 p.m., the SSD was observed to pick up trash from the dining room floor and threw it away. She did not do any hand hygiene and put a table cloth on Resident 21's table and provided clothing protectors for Resident 21, Resident 46, Resident 7, and Resident 3. A current policy, titled, Laundry/Linen dated 12/2021, was provided by the Executive Director (ED),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to designate an Infection Preventionist (IP) who was available for a minimum of 20 hours a week and did not share the duties/responsibilities of other departments, to ensure daily monitoring and implementation of the Infection Control and Prevention program for 5 of 5 months reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 75 of 75 residents who resided in the facility: Findings include: Upon survey entrance, name and certification of the facilities IP was requested and provided. The Executive Director (ED) indicated the facility's IP was Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN) 4, who also served as the full time Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator. On 6/4/24 at 10:24 a.m., the Regional IP Consultant (RIPC) indicated the facility had been without a full-time IP for a couple of months, but he came to the building about 1-2 times a month in order to update the infection tracking binder, complete the infection mapping and antibiotic stewardship reports. The RIPC indicated, his time in the building was less than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a bariatric bed with mobility bars and her call light was in reach for 1 of 5 resident reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident 43). Findings include: On 6/2/24 at 11:23 a.m., Resident 43 was observed lying on her left side on the edge of her mattress. The upper portion of her mattress was outside of the bed frame. Her call light was observed on the floor. On 6/3/24 at 2:18 p.m., Resident 43's was in her room, in her wheelchair, and her call light was observed on the floor. On 6/4/24 at 10:04 a.m., Resident 43 was in her room, in her wheelchair, and her call light was observed on the floor. On 6/5/24 at 9:39 a.m., Resident 43 was observed sitting on the edge of her bed with her feet on the floor. Her mattress was observed to be askew, the top portion of the mattress was outside of the bed frame. She indicated she wanted mobility bars to be able to move easier in bed. On 6/5/24 at 10:27 a.m., Resident 43's record was reviewed. On 5/1/23 her weight was recorded as 382 pounds. Her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess 1 of 4 residents for coordination of preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) who required a referral for a level II assessment based on medical diagnoses and medication usage (Residents 64). Findings include: On 6/5/24 at 9:49 a.m., a record review was completed for Resident 64. He had the following diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy (a chemical imbalance in the brain), psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, anxiety disorder, and depression. Resident 64 had a level I. The level I lacked information to include resident's mental illness diagnosis and use of Haldol (a psychotropic medication used to treat mental and mood disorders). This information would have triggered a level II to be completed if, not omitted. A policy titled, PASRR Policy, was provided by the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) on 6/5/24 R 11:55 a.m. It indicated, .Any resident with an intellectual, mental disability or related condition will be referred to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide nail care for a resident who was unable to care for his own nail care for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 67) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLS). Findings include: During an observation on 6/3/24 at 9:40 a.m., Resident 67's nails were long and dirty. When asked if he wanted his nails that long, he indicated he called his daughter to have her cut them, but she was too busy working. During an observation on 6/4/24 at 3:25 p.m., Resident 67's nails were still long and dirty. During an observation on 6/5/24 at 9:41 a.m., Resident 67's nails were long and dirty. A record review was completed on 6/5/24 at 10:30 a.m. He had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to malignant neoplasm of the prostate (cancer), anemia, hypertension, and age-related physical debility. During an interview with the DNS on 6/5/24 at 9:41 a.m., she was informed of resident's nails being long and dirty. She indicated she would inform the nurse to trim his nails or she would trim them herself. Resident 67 had a care plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory equipment had the equipment they needed and the equipment was covered when not in use for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory equipment (Resident 43 and 106). Findings include: 1. On 6/2/24 at 11:23 a.m., Resident 43's respiratory equipment was observed. She was observed to be on 4 liters of oxygen per minute by nasal cannula and had a BIPAP machine (non-invasive ventilator to assist with breathing) on her bedside table. Respiratory tubing was observed leading into a plastic bag, there was no BIPAP mask in the plastic bag. Resident 43 indicated a CNA (Certified Nursing Aide) threw it away and she was unable to use her BIPAP machine at night. On 6/3/24 at 2:19 p.m., the BIPAP mask was observed to be missing. The resident indicated she asked for another BIPAP mask. On 6/4/24 at 10:04 a.m., Resident 43 did not have a BIPAP mask in the plastic bag with the BIPAP tubing. She was unable to use it.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was utilized during high contact resident care, to prevent the potential for the spread of infection for a resident for (Resident 62) who had an open wound with recurrent infections for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Findings include: During a random observation on 6/4/24 at 9:43 a.m., Resident 62 was observed in the spa room on the secured memory care unit, where she received a shower from an unidentified nursing assistant (CNA). The CNA did not have an isolation gown or gloves on as she conducted Resident 62's shower. Resident 62 was seated on a shower chair, and evidence of stool incontinence was present by smell and stool was observed on the shower floor near the drain. When asked where the Resident's wound was, the CNA gently asked the resident to lean forward, and with her bare hand lifted the skin of her right buttock to reveal the wound. The wound dressing was not in place and the open wound was in direct contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure failed to ensure fall interventions were personalized, implemented, and care planned for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident B). Findings include, An Indiana State Department of Health Survey Report System report, dated 3/6/24 at 8:26 a.m., indicated Resident B had an unwitnessed fall with injury, and was unable to explain how incident happened. Resident B had an acute oblique distal clavicle fracture and was sent to the emergency room (ER) once results received. All interventions were in place prior to fall to include call light in reach and non-skid footwear, call before you fall signage, and body pillow. On 3/11/24 a follow up indicated the root cause of the fall was determined to be resident attempting to go to work. An anonymous interview indicated Resident B had fallen 3 times while in the care of the facility where she had resided less than 3 weeks. On Sunday 3/3/24 the family was informed the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not have significant weight loss for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for weight loss (Resident L). Findings include: On 3/7/24 at 11:29 a.m., Resident L was observed as Activity Assistance (AA) 9 assisted Resident L to a dining room chair. Resident L was observed walking on her own with a walker. AA 9 gave her a coloring page and crayons. She indicated lunch would be arriving soon. On 3/7/24 at 12:20 p.m., Resident L was observed to receive a regular lunch of three large sweet and sour meatballs, a deep fried eggroll, sugar snap peas, steamed rice, mandarin oranges, and vanilla ice cream. No one cut-up her food for her. No staff member directed, cued, or assisted her with eating. During a limited interview during lunch, on 3/7/24 at 12:35 p.m., Resident L indicated she was having trouble chewing her food and she did not like it. She had been observed taking very few and small bites from the eggroll and chewed for a long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all resident rooms were adequately cleaned for 19 of 20 residents reviewed for cleanliness and home-like environment (Resident B, C, D, E, G, H, J, L, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, and X). B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a memory care (MC) resident's refrigerator did not contain spoiled, undated food for 1 of 1 MC refrigerators reviewed for spoiled, undated food (Resident D) and failed to ensure other resident refrigerators had completed refrigerator temperature sheets for 4 of 4 residents' refrigerator observed (Resident F, J, and L). C. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep a hall clear of open soiled bags of linen and trash outside a resident's room for 1 of 15 resident rooms observed (Resident M). Findings include: A. On 8/17/23 at 9:35 a.m., during a general observation of the building, only one housekeeping cart was observed by a resident's room on the B Wing. On 8/17/23, during a continuous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to reconcile and document the disposition of medications for 4 of 5 discharged residents reviewed for discharge (Residents 64, 67, 68, and 69). Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 10:51 a.m., Resident 64's medical record was reviewed. He had the following diagnoses, which included, but were not limited to, diabetes type II, congestive heart failure, essential hypertension, major depression, anxiety bi-polar disorder, osteoarthritis of the knee, and reduced mobility. Resident 64's medication regimen included acetaminophen, atorvastatin, biofreeze, clopidogrel, cyclobenzaprine, doxycycline, escitalopram oxalate, ferrous sulfate, gabapentin, insulin lispro, Levemir insulin, melatonin, metformin, metoprolol tartrate, nitroglycerin, pantoprazole, quetiapine, ranolazine, tamsulosin, thera-M vitamin, tramadol, and zinc. 2. On [DATE] at 10:35 a.m., Resident 67's medical record was reviewed. She had the following diagnoses, but not limited to Alzheimer's disease,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's, (Resident 31) comprehensive care plan was updated to reflect the change of his Advance Directive status and wishes, and failed to ensure a physician's order was obtained for a resident (Resident 66) who received hospice care and had an Out of Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Advance Directives. Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 11:52 a.m., Resident 31 was initially observed. He sat upright on the edge of his bed; he was alert and oriented. During the interview he was asked if he had advance directive plans and he indicated that there was a recent meeting where he decided to change his status like his brother to a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). On [DATE] at 12:00 p.m., Resident 31's medical record was reviewed for advance directive status. He had a Physician Order for Scope of Treatment (POST) which indicated he was a DNR status, while his comprehensive care plan indicated Resident 31…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was updated after removal of a nephrostomy tube for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident 21). Findings include: On 3/13/23 at 11:28 a.m., during a random interview and observation, Resident 21 was seated in a wheelchair, in her room. She wore a hospital gown and a blue sweater. A small catheter bag, which contained clear yellow liquid, was observed on the resident's lap. A larger urinary catheter bag, which was covered for dignity, was attached underneath her wheelchair. Resident 21 indicated she had a suprapubic (catheter inserted through the abdomen to the bladder) fastened under her chair, the smaller bag was a drain to her kidney. She did have two drains, one to each kidney but the urologist was able to remove one. On 3/16/23 at 10:14 a.m., Resident 21's medical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included but were not limited to sepsis (severe systemic infection), chronic kidney disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and adult failure to thrive. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify change in condition and ensure timely transfer to the hospital after residents experienced change of condition for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents 16 and 26). Findings include: 1. On 3/14/23 at 10:22 a.m., Resident 16 was initially observed. He laid in his bed which was in a raised position, slightly higher than regular height. Although the head of his bed was elevated, he asked that it be raised higher to make it easier for him to speak. There was a long flexible arm device attached to the left side bedrail and positioned directly near his mouth. He was observed to be overweight, and indicated he was unable to move due to being quadriplegic. He wore a nasal cannula (NC) which was hooked up to a concentrator beside his bed set at 4 liters (L). He indicated he had gotten an infection in his spine which gradually paralyzed him, most recently he had lost even more control of his hands and arms. He was soft…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the potential for falls for a resident who had a history of falls with fracture for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 34). Findings include: During an observation on 3/17/23 at 1:12 p.m., Resident 34 was observed lying in bed. She had a low air mattress, regular size with grab bars. The mattress did not have bolsters (build up edges for boundaries) on it. During an observation on 3/20/23 at 12:57 p.m., Resident 34 was observed lying in bed. She had a regular low air loss mattress without bolsters. A comprehensive record review was completed for Resident 34 on 3/20/23 at 9:32 a.m. She had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, senile degeneration of the brain, fracture of the right femur, protein-calorie malnutrition, dementia, osteoporosis, and muscle weakness. On 8/8/22, Resident had a fall and was sent to the hospital for surgical repair of her right femur. Resident 34 returned to the facility on 8/12/22. An Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatments/services for a resident who had a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for PTSD (Resident 56) Findings include: On 3/14/23 at 9:36 a.m., Resident 56 was observed sitting up in a standard chair with bright tape on the arms of the chair in her room. The door to the room was shut. On 3/15/23 at 10:32 a.m., Resident 56 was observed lying in bed on her right side. Her eyes were closed. On 3/15/23 at 2:34 p.m., Resident 56 was observed sitting up in a chair in her room. The door to her room was shut. On 3/16/23 at 9:23 a.m., Resident 56 was observed sitting up in a chair in her room. The door to the room was shut. On 3/16/23 at 12:16 p.m., Resident 56 was observed sitting up in her wheelchair in the dining room. She was alert and did not display any behaviors. On 3/20/23 at 9:51 a.m., Resident 56 was observed sitting in the lounge area with other residents. She was alert and did not display any behaviors. On 3/15/23 at 2:02 p.m., a comprehensive record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly label medications for 2 of 2 residents randomly observed during a medication storage observation (Residents 21 and Resident 4) . Findings include: 1. During an observation on 3/15/23 at 8:55 a.m., Resident 21 had an order for thera-M 9mg/400mcg by mouth daily. RN 9 removed the bottle of medication from the cart. The bottle lacked a prescription label. It had her name on it. 2. During an observation on 3/16/23 at 11:43 a.m., Resident 4 had a box with her name on it. LPN 5 indicated these medications were stored in the narcotic box. She had two boxes. One was 1:3 releaf oil. The other was social CBD. LPN 5 indicated one goes on her skin and the other was oral. The medications lacked a prescription label. On 3/17/23 at 10:20 a.m., a policy titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, was provided by the DNS (Director of Nursing Services). The policy indicated, .Facility staff should not administer a medication if the medication or prescription label is missing or illegible. 3.1-25(j) 3.1-25(m)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.4 | -2.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 89 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 89; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DICE, MARK | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 06/01/2023 |
| KELSEY, DONNA | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 06/01/2016 |
| STORDY, DAVID | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 09/15/2016 |
| THOMAS, ROBERT | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 11/16/2015 |
| VAN CAMP, STEVEN | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 09/06/2019 |
| BABCOCK, PAUL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/30/2020 |
| AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2003 |
| HOLDER, NICOLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/03/2022 |
| LANE, SHANNON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/19/2022 |
| MCGLOTHLIN, TARA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/04/2018 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $745K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155291. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.