Hickory Creek At Crawfordsville
817 N Whitlock Ave, Crawfordsville, IN 47933 · For profit - Corporation · 36 certified beds · (765) 362-8590 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (18) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.8% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.7% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.7% | 25.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 3.9% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.0% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.8% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.1% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 3.6% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.1% | 23.3% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.5% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 36 beds and averages 34.8 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff (RN 4) were properly trained, monitored, and compliant with medication administration and infection control practices for 4 of 6 residents observed for medication administration (Residents B, D, E, and F). Findings include:A complaint during the survey indicated Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 6 had not administered eye medications to Resident B according to her orders or failed to administer the eye medications but documented she had administered them. QMA 6 also was not placing lidocaine patches (used to relieve localized pain) on residents but documenting she had. Grievances logs, dated 2/11/26, 3/10/26, and 4/21/26, indicated Resident B or her representative had reported the resident had not been receiving her eye drops as ordered from QMA 6. During a random observation on 5/4/26 at 7:40 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) 4 was presetting medications on top of a medication cart on the back hallway. There were 15 medications cups on the top of the cart with resident names written in black sharpie,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff (RN 4) washed his hands per policy before, between, and after medication administration for 5 of 6 residents observed for medication administration (Residents B, D, E, F, and N). Findings include:1. On 5/4/26 at 7:35 a.m., RN 4 was observed taking a preset cup of unidentified medications for Resident N from the top of a medication cart and going to the main dining room where he obtained Resident N's vital signs and then administered her medications. RN 4 was not observed to sanitize his hands before or after administering the resident's medications. 2. On 5/4/26 at 7:45 a.m., RN 4 was observed taking a preset cup of unidentified medications for Resident D from the top of a medication cart and going to her room at the opposite end of the hallway. RN 4 obtained Resident D's vital signs and then administered her oral medications in her room. RN 4 donned gloves and administered Restasis drops into both of Resident D's eyes, then immediately instilled Systane 0.6% eye drops into both of her eyes. RN 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%, when 2 errors were observed during 25 opportunities for errors during medication administration resulting in an error rate of 8.0% (Residents D and B). Findings include: 1. On 5/4/26 at 7:45 a.m., RN 4 was observed taking a preset cup of unidentified medications for Resident D from the top of a medication cart and going to her room at the opposite end of the hallway. RN 4 donned gloves and administered Restasis drops into both of Resident D's eyes, then immediately instilled Systane 0.6% eye drops into both of her eyes. RN 4 was not observed to sanitize his hands before or after administering Resident N's medications. Resident D's clinical record was reviewed on 5/4/26 at 10:58 a.m. Diagnoses on Resident D's profile included low back pain and dry eye syndrome. Physician's orders included, a. On 4/3/26, Restasis 0.05% (cyclosporine - prescription eye lubricant used to treat chronic dry eye syndrome) eye drops administer 1 drop in each eye twice a day.b. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed according to infection control practices for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration (Residents E, R, S, T, and U).Findings include, On 1/13/26 at 7:50 a.m., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 10 was observed passing medications during breakfast service in the main dining room. QMA 10 handed Resident R a cup of medications, and while she waited for the resident to swallow her medications, she reached to remove a piece of bacon from Resident X's shirt. QMA 10 lifted her long hair from her neck, scratched her head, and ran her fingers through her hair. When Resident R had finished taking her medications, QMA 10 returned to the medication cart. QMA 10 did not wash or sanitize her hands before she started setting up medications for Resident S. On 1/13/26 at 8:11 a.m., QMA 10 was observed to spoon feed Resident S his medications crushed in applesauce. As QMA walked back to the medication cart, she tweaked the shoulder of Resident U's shirt as she joked with her. QMA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered by manufacturer's specifications for not altering extended release and enteric coated medications during 4 of 32 medications observed being administered (Residents S and U). Findings include:1. Observation of a medication pass in the main dining room included:On 1/13/26 at 8:11 a.m., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 10 was observed to spoon feed Resident S his morning medications crushed and served in applesauce. The medications included Memantine (medication used to treat symptoms of moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease). Review of Resident S's clinical record was completed on 1/13/26 at 9:41 a.m. Diagnoses on Resident S's profile included vascular dementia. Physician's orders included:a. On 11/28/24, memantine 10 milligram (mg) tablet, give 1 by mouth twice daily.b. On 4/17/25, may crush appropriate medications and mix with applesauce or other food source as needed. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), completed 12/5/25, assessed the resident as having severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) coverage of at least 8 consecutive hours each day for 7 days a week, for 1 of 4 quarters of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ-a detailed report that tracks staffing and payroll information, primarily used in the healthcare sector) report reviewed. Findings include: During the entrance conference meeting, on 6/27/25 at 9:56 a.m., review of the PBJ report indicated the facility had failed to have at least 8 consecutive hours of RN coverage on, 1/12/25, 1/17/25, 1/26/25, 2/2/25, 2/8/25, 2/9/25, 2/16/25, and 2/23/25. On 6/27/25 at 12:11 p.m., staffing sheets were provided by the Executive Director (ED). The staffing sheets indicated the following: a. The staffing sheets for 1/12/25, lacked documentation of an RN working in the facility on any shift for that date. b. The staffing sheets for 1/17/25, lacked documentation of an RN working in the facility on any shift for that date. c. The staffing sheets for 1/26/25, lacked documentation of an RN working in the facility on any shift for that date. d. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's nebulizer (a medical device that turns liquid medication into a fine mist, which is then inhaled through a mask or mouthpiece to deliver medication directly to the lungs) mask was maintained in a safe and sanitary manner for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident 88). Findings include: During a random observation, on 6/30/25 at 9:54 a.m., Resident 88's nebulizer mask was observed sitting un-bagged, on the resident's bedside table. During a random observation, on 6/30/25 at 11:55 a.m., the resident's nebulizer mask was observed sitting un-bagged, on the resident's bedside table. During a random observation, on 6/30/25 at 2:11 p.m., the resident's nebulizer mask was observed sitting un-bagged, on the resident's bedside table. Resident 88's record was reviewed on 6/30/25 at 1:48 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease that makes it hard to breathe) and acute and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were followed to prevent possible contamination of work surfaces, with potential to affect residents for 1 of 1 glucometer (a small, portable device that measures the amount of glucose in the blood) observation. Findings include: On 6/30/25 at 10:42 a.m., observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 7 complete glucometer blood sugar assessment for Resident 13. The LPN placed the glucometer on top of the medication cart without a barrier. Once the assessment was completed the nurse removed a hand sanitizing wipe from a canister and wrapped the glucometer in the wipe and placed the glucometer into a plastic cup. On 6/30/25 at 10:45 a.m., during an interview, LPN 7 indicated the hand sanitizing wipes were the wipes she used to clean the glucometer after use. On 6/30/25 at 11:00 a.m., during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the nurse should use specific disinfecting wipes to clean the glucometer after use. The hand sanitizing wipes were not the approved wipes to be used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse was in the facility for 8 consecutive hours during a 24-hour period for 2 of 3 months of the first quarter of 2024 reviewed for sufficient staffing (10/23, 10/29, 12/3, 12/9, 12/10, 12/14, 12/16, 12/17, 12/23, 12/24, 12/25, and 12/30). Findings include: A Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing report, for the first quarter (October 1-December 31) of 2024, indicated the facility failed to have Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 8 consecutive hours on 10/23, 10/29, 12/3, 12/9, 12/10, 12/14, 12/16, 12/17, 12/23, 12/24, 12/25, and 12/30. During an interview on 5/22/24 at 11:37 a.m., the Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCS) indicated they had reviewed the PBJ and she could not verify if the information on the PBJ was correct and would pull staffing reports. She indicated the facility submitted the PBJ data to the home office who reviewed and submitted it for them. During an interview on 5/22/24 at 12:14 p.m., the RDCS provided staffing schedules and indicated they did not have RN coverage for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled properly and the facility failed to ensure expired medications were disposed of for 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed for medication storage (Residents 22, 11, and 8). Findings include: 1. On 5/22/24 at 10:19 a.m., the front hall medication cart contained an undated and opened bottle of eye drop solution. The eye drops solution bottle contained a label that indicated it was for Resident 22. During an interview, on 5/22/24 at 10:20 a.m., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 9 indicated eye drops were good for 28 days once opened and should have an open date on the bottle when opened by staff. Resident 22's record was reviewed on 5/22/24 at 10:48 a.m. A physician order, dated 5/17/24, indicated to administer Refresh Optive Advanced (relieves dry, burning, and irritated eyes) 0.5-1-0.5%, 2 drops in each eye twice a day. 2. On 5/22/24 at 10:25 a.m., the back hall medication cart contained an undated and opened insulin pen. The insulin pen contained a label that indicated it was for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 8 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that personal funds were available on the weekends for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for personal funds (Resident 19). Finding includes: During an interview, on 5/17/24 at 11:36 a.m., Resident 19 indicated she was not able to get money on the weekends and hadn't been able to for a while. Resident 19's record was reviewed on 5/22/24 at 2:00 p.m. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/1/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview, on 5/22/24 at 2:30 p.m., the Business Office Manager (BOM) indicated the residents could obtain their money out of their personal funds Monday through Friday. She was not at the facility on the weekends and had not been employed by the facility for very long. She wasn't aware of the procedure for the weekends. During an interview, on 5/22/24 at 2:33 p.m., the Corporate Business Office Specialist indicated a money bag should be kept at the nurse's station so the residents could obtain the money on the weekends. She was not sure where it was kept exactly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were shaved, for 2 of 16 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs- activities related to personal care) (Residents 30 and 17). Findings include: 1. During the initial observation, on 5/17/24 at 2:17 p.m., Resident 30 was observed with long facial hair. At the same time, the resident indicated he had not been shaved for quite a while. The staff had told him the facility had run out of razors. His preference was to be shaved when he received his shower. He did not wish to shave himself because of his seizure disorder and his fear of having a seizure while shaving. During a random observation. on 5/20/24 at 11:18 a.m., The resident was observed sitting in the dining room waiting on his lunch meal to be served. The resident was observed to be unshaven. Resident 30's record was reviewed on 5/23/24 at 10:11 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dining meal service was completed in a sanitary manner, for 1 of 2 dining service observations. Findings include: During the initial dining meal service observation, on 5/17/24 at 12:36 p.m., Registered Nurse (RN) 3 was observed assisting Resident 9 to cut her sandwich. The nurse was observed to hold a portion of the sandwich with her ungloved left index finger while cutting the sandwich. On 05/17/24 at 12:37 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4 was observed assisting Resident 24 with cutting her sandwich. The CNA was observed to push down on the resident's sandwich with her ungloved hand as she cut the sandwich for the resident. During an interview, on 5/22/24 at 2:50 p.m., the Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCS) indicated it was not appropriate for staff to touch resident food items with ungloved hands. The facility would follow the Indiana retail food guidelines. Section 410 IAC 7-24-171 of the Indiana Department of Health Retail Food Establishment Sanitation Requirements, effective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices were in place to mitigate and prevent the potential for the spread of the COVID-19). This deficient practice had the potential to effect 33 of 33 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: On 11/9/23 at 9:00 a.m., upon entrance into the facility, Resident D (who was later discovered to be COVID-19 positive) was observed seated in the main dining room with three other unidentified residents. None of them were wearing masks as the finished their breakfast meals. Several staff member, unidentified at that time, walked in and out of the dining room, past Resident D. He was not encouraged to wear a mask to return to his room. On 11/9/23 at 9:21 a.m., Housekeeper (HK) 7 was observed in a Red Room (an isolation room with a COVID-19 positive resident). She was observed to wear a surgical mask underneath an N-95 and did not have any eye protection on at that time. On 11/9/23 at 9:25 a.m., Resident C (who was later discovered to have close contact to COVID-19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the family/responsible party of the resident's gradual dose reduction of an antipsychotic medication recommended by pharmacy for 1of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 181). Findings Include: On 3/6/2023 at 2:30 p.m., Resident 181 was observed outside of his room speaking with staff. Resident indicated to staff he wanted the code to get out of here. On 3/9/2023 at 11:48 a.m., Resident 181 was observed ambulating in hallway wandering around looking into different rooms. Resident 181's record was reviewed on 3/8/2023 at 2:30 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Heart failure (a condition in which the heart doesn't blood pump as well as it should), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), Dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning) in other diseases classified elsewhere, mild with anxiety (a feeling of worry,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly clean and store nebulizer (small machine that turns liquid medication into a mist that can be easily inhaled) and oxygen equipment for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents 21, 1, and 16). Findings include: 1a. On 3/6/2023 at 1:53 p.m., Resident 21's nebulizer tubing and equipment was observed to be in a clear plastic bag and was unlabeled and not dated. The clear plastic bag was hanging from the nebulizer machine. On 3/7/2023 at 11:01 a.m., Resident 21's nebulizer tubing and equipment including mouthpiece was observed to be out of the bag sitting next to the nebulizer machine. No date noted to be on the tubing. Resident was resting in her recliner resting. The clear plastic bag for nebulizer observed to be on the floor next to side table. On 3/7/2023 at 12:00 p.m., Resident 21's nebulizer tubing and equipment including mouthpiece was observed to be out of the bag sitting next to machine. Resident was resting in her recliner. On 3/7/2023 at 12:59 p.m., Resident 21's nebulizer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications and blood sugars had been documented as administered and obtained, and they failed to ensure physician documentation addressing pharmacy recommendations for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 18 and 26). Findings include: 1. Resident 18's record was reviewed on 3/8/2023 at 10:49 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (a type of nerve damage caused by long term high blood sugar levels), phantom limb syndrome with pain (pain in the part of limb that is no longer there), chronic kidney disease stage 2 (mild damage to your kidneys), and unspecified atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm that can lead to blood clots in the heart). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/4/2023, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive deficit and received routine insulin medications. A care plan, dated 1/14/2020, indicated the resident received insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper handwashing for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. Findings include: The initial kitchen observation was conducted, on 3/6/23 at 10:07 a.m., with the Culinary & Nutritional Manager (Manager). On 3/6/23 at 10:09 a.m., the Manager was observed to washed hands for less than 20 seconds and touch the faucet handles, without paper towels, when turning off the water. On 3/6/23 at 10:13 a.m., the Manager was observed to wash his hands a second time. He again was observed to washed hands for less than 20 seconds and touch the faucet handles, without paper towels, when turning off the water. During an interview, on 3/6/23 at 10:24 a.m., the Manager indicated he knew better than not to use the paper towel to turn off the faucet and was unsure how long he had washed his hands for. On 3/7/23 at 11:40 a.m., the Executive Director provided a document, with a revision date of July 2022, titled, Hand Hygiene, and indicated it was the policy currently being used by the facility. The policy indicated, .Procedure Steps:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 89 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 89; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HENRY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 05/07/2025 |
| CHIES, STEVEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 03/01/2021 |
| DYNES, SHELDON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| JACKSON, BLAKE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 03/01/2021 |
| JACKSON, ETHAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 03/01/2021 |
| JACKSON, MARK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 03/01/2021 |
| JACKSON, MICHAEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 05/14/2024 |
| JACKSON, WESSLEY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 03/01/2021 |
| JUSTICE, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 03/01/2021 |
| KELSEY, DONNA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 07/18/2024 |
| PIDGEON, JOHN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| SHORE, MARION | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| STITLE, STEPHEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 03/01/2021 |
| WARE, DEBORAH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 08/27/2021 |
| WRIGHT, THERESSA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 05/21/2021 |
| RING, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/01/2022 |
| AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2021 |
| ANDERSON, LESLIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/21/2026 |
| DICE, MARK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2023 |
| FOXWORTHY, RACHEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/22/2026 |
| HAFIDH, SAAD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/18/2025 |
| SHANE, ANDREW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| VAN CAMP, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $683K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155419. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.