Rosebud Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 98.3 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a fall from a mechanical lift did not occur during a transfer from the bed to the chair, resulting in cervical and thoracic fractures of the spine, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident B) The deficient practice was corrected on 1-10-24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. The facility had completed assessments of the resident who had experienced a fall, conduct neurological checks, and audits related to fall events. Findings include: The clinical record of Resident B was reviewed on 2-13-24 at 5:40 p.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, depression, insomnia, aphasia and, nondisplaced fracture of the 7th cerebral vertebra and fracture of the 1st and 2nd thoracic vertebrae (neck area and upper spine area), sustained on 12-30-23. In an interview with CNA 3 on 2-13-24 at 4:26 p.m., she indicated she and CNA 4, were working on the secured memory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nail care and heel protectors were provided and a podiatry visit was completed for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for foot care. (Resident 37 and Resident 56)Findings include:1. a) The clinical record for Resident 37 was reviewed on 7/23/25 at 11:16 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, congestive heart failure, chronic pain, and osteoporosis. The ADL (activities of daily living) care plan, last reviewed/revised 5/23/25, indicated Resident 37 required assistance and/or monitoring for ADL care. The goal was to have her ADL needs met. An approach was morning care to include dressing, starting 10/6/15. The pressure ulcer/injury care plan, last reviewed/revised 5/23/25, indicated Resident 37 was at risk for skin breakdown due to slightly limited sensory perception, very moist skin, incontinence, chairfast, very limited mobility, and a problem with friction and sheer. The goal was for her to be free from skin breakdown. An approach was for her to wear heel…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling catheter drainage bag was free of the contact with the floor for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheter usage. (Resident 86)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 86 was reviewed on 7/28/2025 at 1:05 p.m. The medical diagnoses included cerebral palsy and neurogenic bladder.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 7/3/2025, indicated Resident 86 was cognitively intact, does not refuse care, was dependent on toilet hygiene and was partially to moderately dependent on assistance from staff for personal hygiene, and utilized an indwelling catheter. A urinary catheter care plan, last revised on 7/16/2025, indicated interventions for Resident 86's indwelling urinary catheter to not allow tubing or any part of the drainage system to touch the floor.A physician's order, dated 9/29/2021, indicated for Resident 86 to utilize an indwelling urinary catheter.During an observation on 7/22/2025 at 1:15 p.m., Resident 86 was laying in bed, and her indwelling urinary catheter bag…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate storage of a medicated cream for 1 or 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident 86)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 86 was reviewed on 7/28/2025 at 1:05 p.m. The medical diagnoses included cerebral palsy and neurogenic bladder.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 7/3/2025, indicated Resident 86 was cognitively intact, does not refuse care, was dependent on toilet hygiene and was partially to moderately dependent on assistance from staff for personal hygiene, and utilized an indwelling catheter. A physician's order, dated 9/29/2021, indicated Resident 86 to use a medicated cream routinely for pain control. During an observation on 7/22/2025 at 1:15 p.m., Resident 86 was laying in bed, and a tube of medicated prescription cream was noted to be on the over bed table. Resident 86 indicated staff leave the tube there and do not always administer it, so she will put it on her knees and hips.During an observation on 7/28/2025 at 1:20 p.m., Resident 86…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure misappropriation of residents' medication did not occur for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B and Resident E) This deficient practice was corrected on 3/13/25, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. The facility implemented a systematic plan that included the following actions: in-service education to nursing staff on medication administration and documentation, assessment of residents, and signing out controlled medications. The facility conducted an audit of all narcotic count sheets for all residents receiving narcotic medications and conducted interviews and assessments of all residents for pain with ongoing review presented to the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee for review. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/15/25 at 12:00 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin and dementia. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/11/25, indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete pain assessments for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pain medication and assessments. (Resident B) This deficient practice was corrected on 3/13/25, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. The facility implemented a systematic plan that included the following actions: in-service education to nursing staff on medication administration and documentation, assessment of residents, and signing out controlled medications. The facility conducted an audit of all narcotic count sheets for all residents receiving narcotic medications and conducted interviews and assessments of all residents for pain with ongoing review presented to the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee for review. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 4/15/25 at 12:00 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin and dementia. A physician's order, dated 10/24/24, indicated to administer hydrocodone-acetaminophen (narcotic pain medication)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had water or beverages of choice available for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. (Resident 2, Resident 89, Resident 54, and Resident C) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 6/3/2024 at 1:55 p.m. The clinical diagnosis included dementia. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/28/2024, indicated Resident 2 was cognitively impaired and needed set up assistance for eating tasks. A care plan intervention, dated 5/4/2015, indicated to encourage fluids for Resident 2. An observation and interview on 6/4/2024 at 11:30 a.m., indicated Resident 2 laying in bed at this time with her television on. Resident 2 stated she was very thirsty and hungry. No drink was available in Resident 2's room at this time. 2. During an observation on 5/30/24 at 12:53 p.m., Resident 54 was sitting in a wheelchair in his room, there were no fluids available in his room, the resident had an a empty medication cup on the bedside table. During an observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide their scheduled activity program on the Cottage Unit of the facility; implement and educate staff regarding a residents' individualized activity care plan; and redirect a resident with a history of wandering into other residents' rooms for 7 of 28 residents on the Cottage Unit of the facility. (Residents 6, 49, 35, 52, 60, 65, and 92) Findings include: 1. An observation of the common area of the Cottage Unit was conducted on 5/31/24 at 11:36 a.m. The common area of the unit was a very large room that consisted of a television area in the front corner with recliners around it. There was a sink and counter space in the opposite front corner of the room. It also served as the dining room with enough tables to accommodate the current census of 28 residents on the unit. Several of the tables were pushed together and served as the group activity tables as well as dining room tables. There were couches in the back of the common area. There were 17 residents in the common area at this time, and there were no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to fill out a grievance regarding missing items for 1 of 2 residents interviewed for missing items. (Resident 92) Findings include: An interview conducted with Family Member 9 on 05/30/24 at 12:18 p.m., indicated Resident 92 was missing her bottom dentures since 5/28/24 and a pair of tennis shoes since 5/14/24. Family Member 9 indicated that she reported both of these missing items to the Dementia Care Director on 5/28/24. An interview conducted with Dementia Care Director on 06/03/24 at 12:14 p.m., indicated that she was made aware of the missing items for Resident 92 by Family Member 9 and she, as well as other staff, had been looking for them. She indicated that she was not sure if a grievance was filled out. She indicated that she did not fill out a grievance because she was new and did not know the policy about filling out a grievance for a resident. An interview conducted with Executive Director (ED) on 06/03/24 12:19 p.m., indicated that anyone can fill out a grievance. That included residents, family, or staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent sexual abuse of two residents (Resident C and Resident F) perpetrated by (Resident E) and failed to prevent verbal abuse for (Resident B) for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview with CNA 13 on 5/30/24 at 12:57 p.m., indicated she was 1:1 with Resident E because he had touched Resident C inappropriately. Resident E was lying in bed and talked with me but was unable to be understood. During an interview with Resident C on 5/30/24 at 1:50 p.m., indicated about a month ago Resident E grabbed her right breast while she was sitting at the nursing station. It did not bother her that much because she felt like he did not know what he was doing, but it was disrespectful. The resident indicated the Executive Director and Social Services had talked with her about the incident. Review of the incident report provided by the Executive Director (ED) on 6/3/24 at 10:00 a.m., indicated Resident E extending his hand out and made contact with Resident C on 4/29/24.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had compression stockings in place without wrinkles for 3 of 4 observations of Resident 94's compression stockings. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 94 was reviewed on 6/4/2024 at 11:00 a.m. The medical diagnosis included heart failure. A physician order for 94, dated 4/29/2024, indicated to place thigh high bilateral lower extremity TED hose (compression stockings) in the morning and remove them at night. A care plan intervention, dated 3/29/2024, indicated for Resident 94 to utilize bilateral thigh high TED hose in the morning and remove them at night. An observation and interview on 5/31/2024 at 11:25 a.m. indicated that Resident 94 was sitting in his wheelchair at this time. He was wearing a pair of white compression stockings. The stockings were noted to be wrinkled at the knee joints on both legs. Two additional wrinkles were noted to the left stocking at about a third of the way between the ankle and knee and halfway between the ankle and knee. An additional wrinkle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN