Good Samaritan - Hutchinson Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 52.3 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-08-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 51 residents residing on two halls, North and South. The South Unit had 14 cognitively impaired residents and one Resident, (R) 1, who stated a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) on duty was rough with her. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for 14 residents when CNA E reported to work tearful and stated she did not want to be there, which led to the CNA being rough/loud with R1, causing bruises/scratches during a transfer, and making the resident attend a meal when she stated she did not feel well. This put the 14 residents on the South Unit at risk for abuse. Findings included: - Resident (R) 1's signed physician orders dated 11/10/22 revealed diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 51 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the required annual performance reviews were completed at least once every 12 months for one Certified Medication Aide (CMA) and three Certified Nurse Aides (CNA).Findings included:- Review of the requested facility performance reviews noted the following staff lacked an annual review:CMA T's, hired on 01/11/08, last performance evaluation was completed on 05/31/24. The facility lacked evidence that a performance review was completed in the last 12 calendar months upon request. CNA NN's, hired on 12/19/14, last performance evaluation was completed on 05/31/24. The facility lacked evidence that a performance review was completed for CNA NN.CNA O was hired on 07/26/24. The facility lacked evidence that a performance review was completed for CNA O.CNA MM was hired on 11/19/24. The facility lacked evidence that a performance evaluation was completed for CNA MM.On 12/02/25 at 12:35 PM, CNA O stated she had not had a performance evaluation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 51 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sanitary food preparation and storage. This placed the 51 residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included: - On 12/01/25 at 08:20 AM, the walk-in refrigerator and freezer did not have thermometers inside.The November 2025 Temperature Log directions directed staff to obtain temperatures in the morning and afternoon. The log lacked recorded temperatures for both the morning and the afternoon on 11/01/25, 11/02/25, 11/03/25, 11/04/25, 11/05/25, 11/09/25, 11/13/25, 11/14/25, 11/22/25, and 11/27/25. The log documented the one temperature on 11/20/25 in the afternoon temperature, but lacked a morning temperature. On 12/02/25 at 11:40 AM, observation used dish rags sat next to clean pitchers in the dishwasher room. The magnetic knife holder above the make table had dried food on it. The toaster had a copious amount of dried bread particles on it and on the controls. On 12/01/25 at 08:20 AM, Dietary Staff BB verified the lack of thermometers in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 51 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove or dispose of expired medication in the facility's north medication room. Findings included: - On 12/01/25 at 03:07 PM, inspection of the facility's north medication room revealed:Three unopened bottles of magnesium chloride pills, with an expiration date of 10/2025. A box of 100 bisacodyl suppositories, with an expiration date of 09/2025. On 12/01/25 at 03:07 PM, Administrative Nurse E verified the expiration dates and stated staff were to remove expired medications from service. The facility's Medication Acquisition, Receiving, Dispensing and Storage policy, dated 03/04/25, stated nursing staff would routinely check for expired medications, and necessary disposal would be done in accordance with state/pharmacy regulations.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 51 residents. The sample included 14 residents with Resident (R) 6 reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a collaboration of care between R6's hospice provider and the facility, which included the information on what hospice services would be provided to the residents, as well as how often hospice staff would visit the facility.Findings included:- R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure), and chronic kidney disease (CKD- a long-term condition where the kidneys become damaged and cannot filter blood well, causing waste buildup).R6's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. R6 required partial to moderate assistance from staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow proper food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness. Findings included: - During the initial tour of the kitchen on 11/13/ at 08:30 AM, the refrigerator had the following areas of concerns: 1. One open bag of hotdogs, that lacked an opened date 2. One bag of turkey lunch meat that lacked an opened date and lack a use by date. On 11/13/23 at 08:30 AM, observation of the dry storage area revealed three bags of hot dog buns with a used by date of 10/30/23. In addition, there was one dented can of sliced beets and one dented can of fancy sauerkraut. Interview on 11/14/23 at 11:47 AM, Dietary staff I reported when the facility received a can with a dent from the vendors, staff need to take a picture of it and send it to the certified dietary manager, so the facility could get credit for the dented can, or just throw the dented cans of food in the trash. Food, including the breads should not be used if the date is past the use by date.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 resident with 12 residents in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to show respect and dignity to one Resident (R)4, by not having a dignity bag for the indwelling urinary catheter (a thin, hollow tube inserted through the urethra into the urinary bladder to collect and drain urine) collection bag. Findings included: - The Physician's Orders dated 10/10/23 revealed R4 had a diagnosis of urinary retention (the lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. R4 had an indwelling urinary catheter. The Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 10/12/23, revealed R4 arrived at the facility from the hospital with an indwelling catheter. The Care Plans dated 10/12/23 documented R4 would remain free from catheter-related trauma through review date. Monitor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 residents which included 12 residents sampled for reviewed for transmission of Minimum Data Set, (MDS) assessments. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically transmit Resident (R)51's Discharge Return not Anticipated MDS, tracking no later than 14 days after the assessment Reference date (ARD) of 08/23/23, and/or seven days after the completion date of the MDS as required. Findings included: - On 11/20/23 at 12:30 PM, review of Resident (R)51's Discharge Return not Anticipated Minimum Data Set' (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the MDS had not been electronically transmitted to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) after the assessment Reference date (ARD) of 08/23/23, and/or seven days after the completion date of the MDS as required. On 11/20/23 at 12:50 PM, Administrative Nurse Q confirmed the facility failed to electronically submit the MDS as noted above. She reported a corporate nurse completed the assessment and she was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 residents. The sample of 12 residents included one resident sampled for personal hygiene related to bathing. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for Resident (R)24, related to bathing and hair care. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 24's undated Physician's Orders, documentation included diagnoses of morbid (severe) obesity, communication deficit, weakness, and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Staff reported she preferred a tub bath. She required extensive assistance of staff for bed mobility, personal hygiene, and was totally dependent on staff for transfers, locomotion, toilet use, and one staff assist with bathing. The resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 53 residents with 12 residents included in the sample, including five residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment by failing to implement interventions prevent Resident (R) 106, with moderately impaired cognition, from having repeated falls. Findings included: - R106's signed Physician Orders dated 10/31/23 revealed the following diagnoses: peripheral vascular disease (PVD is an abnormal condition affecting the blood vessels), atrial fibrillation (rapid irregular heart rate), bradycardia (slow heart rate), shortness of breath, unsteadiness on feet, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The resident was occasionally incontinent of urine and continent of bowel. The resident had no complaints of pain. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 with 12 residents in the sample, and five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow recommendation of the pharmacist for Resident (R)17, related to Abnormal Involuntary Movement scale (AIMS- a clinician-rated scale to assess severity of dyskinesias [the inability to execute voluntary movements]) testing and on R6 and R24 regarding as needed (PRN) lorazepam (a medication used for severe agitation) to obtain a new prescription every 14 days. Findings include: - Review of the R17's signed Physician Orders dated 09/11/23, revealed the diagnosis of unspecified dementia moderated without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). Review of the Discharge Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) revealed a score of staff assessment for mental status with memory problems. R17 received seven days…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 56 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS