Good Samaritan-Olathe
20705 W 151st Street, Olathe, KS 66061 · Non profit - Corporation · 128 certified beds · (913) 782-1372 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.4% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.1% | 4.9% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.1% | 2.9% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.1% | 6.5% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.4% | 4.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.7% | 16.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.3% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.8% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.1% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.4% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.5% | 18.1% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.8% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.6% | 73.8% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.2% | 22.4% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.1% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.93 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.61 | 2.13 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
32.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 32.4%CMS range 21.3–47.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.9%CMS range 5.8–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 91.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 10.2%CMS range 6.4–15.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.87 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 117.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.11 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-12-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 114 residents. The sample included 23 residents with eight reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent weight monitoring per the professional standards of practice after admission, failed to obtain weekly weights as ordered by the physician, and failed to provide cueing for meals as needed for Resident (R) 38. The facility further failed to implement nonpharmacological interventions to prevent weight loss for R38 until after a significant unplanned loss occurred. These deficient practices resulted in a loss of 12.15% in three months. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R38's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), muscle weakness, chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 123 residents with one kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain sanitary dietary standards related to food storage and food temperature checks. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk related to foodborne illnesses and food safety concerns.Findings included:- On 07/21/24 at 07:00 AM, a walkthrough of the facility's secured 100 Hall was completed. An inspection of the unit's kitchenette refrigerator revealed uncovered and labeled food plates from the previous evening's dinner on the top two shelves. The refrigerator had food residue on the inside of the walls. An inspection of the Juice machine area revealed a cup caked in pink drink mix residue in a drawer directly under the juice fountain.On 07/21/25 at 07:28 AM, an observation in the kitchen's dry food storage room revealed a bread storage cart. The bread storage car had a sign that documented when bread was pulled from the freezer, staff were to mark it with a date and use that bread within seven days, no exceptions.On 07/21/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 123 residents. The sample included 24 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to secure chemicals in a safe, locked area, and out of reach of the twelve cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents. This placed the affected residents at risk for preventable accidents.Finding included:- On 07/21/25 at 07:05 AM, an initial walkthrough of the facility revealed an unsecured exam room on the 300 Hall. An inspection of the exam room revealed a container of purple disinfectant wipes on the counter. The label on the wipes contained the warning, Keep out of reach of children, hazardous to humans, can cause eye irritation, harmful if swallowed.On 07/21/25 at 10:00 AM, an inspection of the facility's secured 100 Hall revealed a kitchenette area. An inspection of the kitchenette revealed a container of purple disinfecting wipes in the cabinet underneath the sink. The label on the wipes contained the warning, Keep out of reach of children, hazardous to humans, can cause eye irritation, harmful if swallowed. Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 123 residents. The sample included 24 residents, with one resident reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide services in a dignified manner for Resident (R) 31 when staff stood over R31 while feeding her a yogurt cup. This deficient practice placed R31 at risk for impaired dignity and decreased psychosocial well-being.Findings included:- R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), bradycardia (low heart rate, less than 60 beats per minute), difficulty walking, and abnormalities of gait and mobility.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R31 needed set up or cleanup for eating, set up or cleanup for oral hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 123 residents. The sample included 24 residents. One resident was sampled for reasonable accommodations of the resident's needs. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 38's call light was within his reach. This deficient practice left R38 vulnerable to unmet care needs due to the inability to call for staff assistance.Findings included:- R38's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), psychotic disturbance (a loss of touch with reality characterized by altered thinking, perceptions, and behavior), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), bradycardia (low heart rate, less than 60 beats per minute), repeated falls, need for assistance with personal care, lack of coordination, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (the muscles that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 123 residents. The sample included 24 residents, with one resident reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to report an unwitnessed injury fall of Resident (R) 58 (severely cognitively impaired), resulting in emergency medical treatment to the state investigative agency. This placed the residents at risk for potentially unidentified and ongoing abuse and /or neglect.Findings included:- The Medical Diagnosis section within R58's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), insomnia (difficulty sleeping), muscle weakness, and abnormal gait/mobility.R58's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 06/06/25 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS noted she required substantial to maximal assistance with dressing, toileting, footwear, and personal hygiene, but could transfer and ambulate with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 123 residents. The sample included 24 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold and notification was provided to Resident (R) 1, and her representative was provided with a bed hold policy that included the facility's per diem rate to hold a bed. The facility failed to ensure R1 and her representative were provided a written notification of transfer upon her transfer to the hospital. This placed R1 at risk of miscommunication between the facility and the resident's representative, and the possible missed opportunity for healthcare services.Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hypertension (elevated blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), cerebrovascular disease (CVA- stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), and dementia (a progressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 123 residents. The sample included 24 residents, with four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) for dependent residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a shower/bath was provided for Resident (R) 52, who was dependent on staff assistance with ADLs. This deficient practice had the potential to cause skin breakdown and/or skin complications due to poor personal hygiene and impaired psychosocial well-being.Findings included:- R52's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, abnormalities of mobility, and cancer of the endometrium (mucous membrane that lines the uterus).The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 05/30/25 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R52 required substantial to maximum staff assistance with bathing, transfers, bed mobility, and personal hygiene during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 123 residents. The sample included 24 residents, with one resident reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete weekly wound assessments, including wound measurements, for Resident (R) 11's right knee wound. This placed R11 at increased risk for worsening pressure or skin injuries and delayed wound recovery. Findings included:- R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and open wound on right knee.The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 12/18/24 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R11 required substantial to maximum staff assistance for dressing upper body and mobility. The MDS documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 123 residents. The sample included 24 residents, with three residents reviewed for treatment and services to prevent or heal pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to effectively implement interventions to reduce the risk or promote healing of pressure injuries for Resident (R) 74 and R31, the facility further failed to ensure R3's offloading boots were placed on his heels. This placed R74, R31, and R3 at increased risk for pressure ulcer development.Findings included:- R74's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), history of falls, major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 123 residents. The sample included 24 residents, with two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 45's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep), and nasal oxygen tubing (medical device used to deliver supplemental oxygen therapy to individuals with low oxygen levels) were stored in a sanitary manner. This placed R45 at an increased risk for respiratory infection and complications.Findings included:- R45's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hallucination (sensing things while awake that appear to be real, but the mind created), metabolic encephalopathy (a condition in which brain function is disturbed either temporarily or permanently due to different diseases or toxins in the body), obesity (due to excessive calories), sleep apnea (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 123 residents. The sample included 24 residents, with six sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported when Resident (R) 54's hypotension (a medication that treats low blood pressure) medication Midodrine order lacked a diagnosis. The CP failed to identify and report when R54's Midodrine was administered by facility staff outside of the physician-ordered parameters. This placed R54 at risk of unnecessary medication administration and related complications. Findings included:- R54's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of orthostatic hypotension (blood pressure dropping with change of position), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), and syncope (fainting or passing out). R54's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 01/22/25 documented she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated intact cognition. R54 required setup to supervision assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 123 residents. The sample included 24 residents, with six sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 54's hypotension (a medication that treats low blood pressure) medication order, Midodrine, included a diagnosis for use. The facility failed to ensure R54's physician-ordered parameter for Midodrine was followed before the medication was administered. This placed R54 at risk of unnecessary medication administration and related complications. Findings included:- R54's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of orthostatic hypotension (blood pressure dropping with change of position), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), and syncope (fainting or passing out). R54's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 01/22/25 documented she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated intact cognition. R54 required setup to supervision assistance from staff. R54 received an antipsychotic (a class of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 123 residents. The sample included 24 residents, with five reviewed for nutritious diets. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at a palatable, safe, and appetizing temperature for Residents (R) 80 and R104. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for risks related to impaired nutrition and weight loss.Findings included:- On 07/21/24 at 07:00 AM, a walkthrough of the facility's secured 100 Hall was completed. An inspection of the unit's kitchenette revealed that the kitchen had an oven, and a microwave included in the kitchenette. The microwave had signage that noted When heating foods in the microwave, please make use of the thermometers provided to ensure that your food reaches the safe temperature of 165 degrees. An inspection of the cabinet to the right of the microwave revealed a thermometer and a box of disposable thermometer covers. An inspection of the refrigerator revealed uncovered and labeled food plates from the previous evening's dinner on the top two shelves.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 123 residents. The sample included 24 residents, with two residents reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to update Resident (R) 49's plan of care to reflect the services, medication, and equipment provided to R49 by hospice. This deficient practice created a risk for missed opportunities for services and delayed physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for R49. Findings included:- R49's electronic medical record (EMR) documented diagnoses of Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery (plaque buildup in and on the walls of the heart arteries) and cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 06/25/25 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R49 required partial to moderate assistance for showers or bathing, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 120 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to notify Resident (R) 1's representative of care plan changes and/or results. This deficient practice had the risk of miscommunication between R1, their representative, and the facility. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of heart failure (HF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) following cerebral infarction (cerebrovascular accident [CVA]/stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) affecting the right dominant side, and seizures. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 11/06/24, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status was not conducted due to R1 rarely or never understood. R1 had coughing or choking during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 114 residents with one kitchen and two main dining rooms. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary dietary standards related to cleanliness of the kitchen/dining room equipment, clean ventilation, equipment storage, hygienic serving practices, and food storage. This placed the residents at risk for food borne illness. Finding Included- - On 12/06/23 at 07:02AM an initial walkthrough of the kitchen was completed. An inspection of the air conditioning vents above the food warming station, stove/grill, food prep table, sink, and clean plates storage revealed layered debris/dust covering the vents. An inspection of the spice storage shelf revealed spilled spice particles covering the bottle and shelf. An inspection of the wet condiment shelf revealed sticky residue underneath the honey, vanilla, and vinegar bottles. An inspection of the storage area outside the kitchen revealed a buffet table with piles of clean cloth napkins covering the top of the buffet table exposed to the environment. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-12 · tag F0943 — widespreadGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 114 residents. Five Certified Nurse Aide's (CNA) were sampled for prevention of abuse, neglect, and exploitation training. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide evidence of the required prevention of abuse, neglect, and exploitation training for one of the five CNAs that were sampled. This placed the residents at risk for abuse. Findings included: - Employee record review of CNA OO revealed the facility failed to provide evidence that CNA OO received the required abuse, neglect, and exploitation training. On 12/11/12 at 02:24 PM Administrative Nurse D stated she contacted CNA OO and asked him to come in and complete the required education. On 12/12/23 at 02:41 PM Administrative Nurse D stated Consultant II oversaw and tracked the compliance and education requirements/hours for the employees at the facility. Administrative Nurse D stated it was also her responsibility to make sure employees were up to date on required training. An education policy was not provided by the facility. The facility failed to provide evidence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-12 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 114 residents. Five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) were sampled for required in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure two of the five CNA staff reviewed had the required 12 hours of in-service education which included dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care training. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of life and/or inadequate care. Findings included: - Review of the facility's in-service records revealed the following: CNA OO, hired on 11/30/05, had 1.75 hours of in-service in the past 12 months. Review of trainings for CNA OO for past year lacked evidence of the required education on the topic of dementia. CNA QQ, hired on 08/31/16, had 6.59 hours of in-service in the past 12 months. Review of trainings for CNA QQ for past year lacked evidence of the required education on the topic of dementia. On 12/11/12 at 02:24 PM Administrative Nurse D stated she contacted CNA OO and asked him to come in and complete the required education. On 12/12/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 114 residents. The sample include 23 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent activities for Resident (R) 7 and the other cognitively impaired residents who resided outside of the locked unit. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for decreased psychosocial wellbeing and boredom. Findings included: - On 12/11/23 at 09:50 a group of cognitively impaired residents sat in the fireplace social area. The residents were not alerted or invited to attend the scheduled 10:00AM. The residents did not attend the planned activity event from 10:00AM to 11:00AM. On 12/11/23 at 10:00AM the facility held a Name that Christmas song activity. The activity provided snacks for the residents as they listened for the mystery Christmas songs played. At 10:33AM R7 () wheeled herself down the hall and into the activities room. R7 wheeled herself around the room and residents attending the event. R7 wheeled herself to the front of the room by the activities staff. Staff did not invite…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 114 residents. The facility had three medication rooms and seven medication carts. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure accurate labeling of medications to facilitate consideration of precautions and safe administration of medications in accordance with professional standards. The facility failed to ensure safe and secure storage of medications. This deficient practice created a risk for adverse side effects and ineffective medication administration. Findings included: - On 12/06/23 during the initial tour, the Exam Room was unlocked. Inspection of the room revealed an unlocked medication refrigerator with multiple boxes of Covid-19 vaccine and multiple does of pneumococcal vaccine. The refrigerator contained one vial of opened but undated tuberculin serum The November temperature log was posted on the refrigerator and the temperatures stopped at 11/27/23 with no further evidence staff assessed temperatures after 11/27/23. There was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 114 residents. The sample included 23 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control practices. This placed the residents at risk for transmission of infectious disease. Findings included: - Observation On 12/06/23 during the initial tour, the Exam Room was unlocked. The room had a bin of hair products including clippers and a hairbrush with gray hairs in it. The brush was in with the clippers, on the counter, and was unlabeled with any resident name or room number. The desk-type chair in the exam room had short gray hairs all over the seat surface. The handwashing sink in the exam room was not equipped with paper towels for drying. Observation on 12/06/23 at 07:12 AM an unidentified staff member walked down the hall with no mask. The staff member held a piece of paper up to her face to cover her mouth and nose. Observation on 12/06/23 at 09:06 AM two sit to stand lifts and a Hoyer (total body mechanical lift) sat in the hallway and all three- of the lifts had debris…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 114 residents. The sample included 23 residents with three residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 60 and R209 each had a call light within reach. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care. Findings included: - R60'S Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnoses tab, recorded diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) and diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). R60's Quarterly Minimum Data Set [MDS] dated 10/27/23 recorded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 114 residents. The sample included 23 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a person-centered baseline care plan for Resident (R) 209 related to his bathing preferences. This deficient practice placed R209 at risk of impaired care related to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R209's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of need for assistance with personal care, dependence on a wheelchair, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] was in progress. R209's Care Area Assessment (CAA) was in progress. R209's Care Plan dated 11/28/23 documented the resident required (specify bathing options [reclining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 114 residents. The sample included 23 residents with five residents review for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 60's Care Plan was revised to include his use of insulin (hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood). This placed R60 at risk for complications related insulin use due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R60'S Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the :Diagnoses tab, recorded diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) and diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). R60's Quarterly Minimum Data Set [MDS] dated 10/27/23 recorded a Brief Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 114 residents. The sample included 23 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing for Resident (R) 7 and R209. This deficient practice had the risk for poor hygiene, skin infections, decreased self-esteem and impaired dignity. Findings included: - R7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of hearing loss, intellectual disabilities, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings pf sadness) and need for assistance with personal care. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a staff interview R7's long term memory was ok, short-term memory was ok and some difficulty in new situations. The MDS documented that R7 required extensive assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living (ADLs). The Quarterly MDS dated 09/08/23 documented a staff interview revealed R7's short term memory was ok, long-term memory was ok,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 114 residents. The sample included 23 residents with one resident reviewed for. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow a physician order for daily weights to monitor for fluid overload for Resident (R) 97. This deficient practice placed R97 at risk for delay in treatment related to fluid overload and untreated illness. Findings included: - R97's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and history of falls. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of five which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R97 required partial/moderate assistance moving from a sitting position to standing. The MDS documented R97 received a diuretic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 114 residents. The sample included 23 residents with seven reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, The facility failed to provide consistent Roam Alert (bracelet that sets off an alarm when residents wearing one attempt to exit the building without an escort) functionality checks on Residents (R) 25's Roam Alert band. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for elopement. The facility additionally failed to prevent avoidable accidents during R33's Hoyer (full body lift) lift transfers resulting in minor injuries and failed to utilize R87's care planned Hoyer lift while transferring her to her bed resulting in a non-injury fall. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R25 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), needs for assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 114 residents. The sample included 23 residents with two reviewed for incontinence management and urinary catheters. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide individualized incontinence interventions based on Resident (R)55's significant status change. The facility additionally failed to provide consistent monitoring of urinary catheter care for R101. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications related to incontinence and/or urinary tract infections (UTIs). Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R55's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Recent fracture (Bone Break) of the left femur (large leg bone), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and cognitive communication deficit. R55's Significant Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 11/10/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 114 residents. The sample included 23 residents with five residents review for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported irregularities with Resident (R) 60's insulin (hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood). This placed R60 at risk for complications related to insulin use. Findings included: - R60'S Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnoses tab, recorded diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) and diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). R60's Quarterly Minimum Data Set [MDS] dated 10/27/23 recorded a Brief Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 114 residents. The sample included 23 residents with five residents review for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 60 received his insulin (hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) as ordered by the physician and failed to ensure blood glucose levels outside of physician ordered parameters were reported to the physician as ordered. This placed R60 at risk for complications related to insulin use. Findings included: - R60'S Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnoses tab, recorded diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) and diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 114 residents. The sample included 23 residents with two residents reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to establish a communication process, including how the communication will be documented between the facility and the hospice provider, to ensure that the needs of the resident were addressed and met 24 hours per day for Resident (R) 47 and R202. The facility failed to ensure that R47 and R202's written plan of care included both the most recent hospice plan of care and a description of the services furnished by both the facility and hospice. This placed R47 and R202 at risk of decline and/or from maintaining the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R47 documented diagnoses of sequalae of cerebral infarction (conditions produced after the acute phase of an illness or injury due to a stroke), altered mental status (-a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 108 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, when kitchen observation revealed numerous expired food items. This placed the residents who received meals from the facility kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 02/07/22 at 08:15 AM, during initial tour of the main kitchen revealed the following items were expired: House Recipe Quick Grits (five containers, expired on 01/15/22) Thickened Cranberry Cocktail 46 ounce container (one container, expired on 01/18/22) light molasses one gallon container (three containers, expired on 12/22/17) Potato Pearls 29.3 ounce box (six boxes, expired on 11/06/21) Carnation Breakfast Essentials Pack (19 packs, expired on 09/09/21), Gelatin Mix Assorted Flavors three ounce pack (11 packs, with expiration dates of 06/2018, 07/2018, 08/2018, and 01/2021) Drink Mix Assorted Flavors 1.27 ounce pack (30 packs, with expiration dates of 12/2020 and 01/2021) Mousse Mix Assorted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 108 residents with 22 sampled including one reviewed for an indwelling catheter. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote dignity when staff failed to provide a privacy bag for the indwelling urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag) drainage bag for Resident (R) 22. This placed R22 at risk for impaired dignity and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings included: - Review of 22's Physician Order Sheet documented the following diagnoses of hydronephrosis (swelling of a kidney due to a build-up of urine) and obstructive uropathy (disorder of the urinary tract that occurs due to obstructed urinary flow). The 05/28/21 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a staff assessment indicated long and short-term memory problem with severely impaired cognition. R22 had an indwelling catheter. The Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 05/28/21 documented the resident had a permanent indwelling urinary catheter in place on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 108 residents with 22 sampled including one for an indwelling catheter. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide safe, sanitary, and hygienic catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag) care by allowing Resident (R) 22's indwelling catheter drainage bag to touch the floor. This placed the resident at risk for improper catheter care. Findings included: - Review of 22's Physician Order Sheet documented the following diagnoses: hydronephrosis (swelling of a kidney due to a build-up of urine) and obstructive uropathy (disorder of the urinary tract that occurs due to obstructed urinary flow). The 05/28/21 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a staff assessment indicated long and short-term memory problem with severely impaired cognition. R22 had an indwelling catheter. The Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 05/28/21 documented the resident had a permanent indwelling urinary catheter in place on admission. The Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 108 residents with 22 sampled with three residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide safe and sanitary care for oxygen tubing to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections for one Resident (R) 63. This placed R63 at risk for infections. Findings Included: - R63's Electronic Health Record (EHR) under the medical diagnosis tab documented the diagnosis of hypoxemia (abnormal deficiency in the concentration of oxygen in arterial blood). The 07/02/21 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R63 had a Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition, with no use of oxygen noted. The 02/02/21 Care Plan documented R63 had altered respiratory status. Staff were to monitor R63 for signs or symptoms of acute respiratory insufficiency and respiratory infection. R63 had oxygen (O2) therapy, as needed (PRN). The EHR documented a Physician Order on 12/04/21 for albuterol sulfate (bronchodilator- works by relaxing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 108 residents with 22 sampled including one for dialysis care. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to monitor Resident (R) 258's dialysis (procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) treatments appropriately by not sending or collecting the dialysis communication forms. This placed the resident at risk for complications and health decline. Findings include: - Review of Resident (R) 258's Physician Order Sheet documented the diagnosis of end stage (a terminal disease because of irreversible damage to vital tissues or organs) renal (kidney) disease (ESRD). The 11/29/21 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R258 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The resident required staff assistance with all her activities of daily living (ADLs) except eating which she could do with some set up help. R258 required dialysis. The 11/29/21 ADL Functional/Rehab Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R258 had ESRD and received dialysis three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 4.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 91 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 91; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SANFORD | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/2019 |
| THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/2019 |
| BROWN, GEORGE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| DYKHOUSE, DANA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| ENGBRECHT, WESLEY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| GASSEN, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| GULSVIG, NEIL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| HERSETH SANDLIN, STEPHANIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| LUNDEEN, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| MCCAUSLAND, MAUREEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| MOLBERT, LAURIS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| NORTH, ANDREW | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| SCHIEFFER, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| SHULKIN, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| TEIKEN, BRENT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| VENTLING-HERRMANN, MARNIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| WENZEL, THOMAS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| FLUIT, JOEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2022 |
| MIDDLETON, AIMEE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/27/2022 |
| OLSON, NICHOLAS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2024 |
| SCHEMA, NATHAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| MORRISON, TONY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| PITZL, FRED | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/03/2013 |
| ROBINSON, LEON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2022 |
| SANDGREN, DEEANDRA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/16/2023 |
| DTN STAFFING INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/02/2024 |
| FOCUSONE SOLUTIONS | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/04/2024 |
| GRAPE TREE MEDICAL STAFFING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/13/2018 |
| PHARMERICA CORPORATION | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 60 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175263. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.