No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hoeger House

20911 West 153rd Street, Olathe, KS 66061 · Non profit - Corporation · 34 certified beds · (913) 397-2900 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (913) 397-2900 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
20805 W 151st St Ste 400 · (913) 390-8050 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
20375 W 151st St · (913) 393-4440 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.3 mi
20250 W 154th St · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
15500 S Lone Elm Rd · (913) 971-8563 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
910 W Frontier Ln · (913) 549-6942

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%73.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.3%22.4%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.7%11.5%12.0%better

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 225 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.39U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 126 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 45% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.5%CMS range 53.1–63.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 8.6–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge59.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.6%CMS range 3.0–8.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

2.00
RN hours/ resident / day
1.08
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.47
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.55
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.52
RN hoursweekends
62.5%
Total nursing turnover
23.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 34 beds and averages 27.8 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.78 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.19 to 1.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-14)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-31)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-08-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility documented a census of 28 residents. The sample included 13 residents with three reviewed for falls. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from preventable accidents when staff failed to ensure Resident (R) 67 had foot pedals on her wheelchair before staff propelled the resident down the hallway to her room. The resident was unable to hold her legs up and placed her foot on the floor which caused the resident to fall forward out of the wheelchair. The fall resulted in a broken left femur (thigh bone). Findings included: - R67's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of weakness, altered mental status (change in mental function that stems from illnesses, disorders and injuries affecting your brain), and generalized muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 28 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food by professional standards for food service safety and failed to consistently document dish machine temperatures. This placed the resident at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings included: - On 05/12/25 at 07:45 AM, during the initial kitchen tour, the two-door refrigerator had dried food particles all across the bottom shelf, and the handles to the refrigerator had dried food on them. The two-door freezer beside the refrigerator had a large, approximately 36 inches in diameter, round milky white frozen substance on the bottom shelf. The ninja blender had brown, crusty, dried food debris around the top of the base of the blender, the microwave was dirty on the outside and had dried red substance all on the walls inside. The toaster had dried food on the front of the toaster and the knobs of it. The second two-door silver refrigerator by the steam table had dried food particles inside it. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 28 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for re-hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) of Resident (R) 16's discharge from the facility. This deficient practice placed R16 at risk for impaired resident rights. Findings include: - R16's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of fracture of left lower leg, atrial fibrillation (rapid irregular heartbeat), end-stage renal disease with dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), and thrombosis (a clot that developed within a blood vessel) of deep veins of both lower extremities. R16's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 28 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organism which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) were used for Resident (R) 23, who had a surgical incision (a surgical cut made in the skin). The deficient practice placed residents in the facility at risk of infectious disease processes. Findings included: -On 05/13/25 at 03:35 PM, R23's room door had an EBP sign. R23 propelled herself into the bathroom, she had an elastic bandage wrapped from her foot to her knee around her left ankle and started to try to transfer herself onto the toilet. Further observation revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) G went into the bathroom and shut the door. After a short time, LN G came out and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 28 residents with one kitchen and one kitchenette. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain sanitary dietary standards related to sanitary food and equipment storage. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk related to food borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings Included: - On 08/29/23 at 07:05AM a walkthrough of the facility's kitchen was completed. An inspection of the facility's freezer unit revealed opened but undated/unlabeled bags of potato wedges, breaded meat patties, and sliced strawberries. An inspection of the equipment storage rack revealed a large pasta strainer on the top shelf stored upward (not inverted) towards the ceiling. An inspection of the facility's deep fryer station revealed a sheet pan covering the fryer unit. Large amounts of old food particles floated in the oil at the top of the deep fryer unit. An inspection of the preparation area revealed dust/debris covering the spice bottles on the rack. On 08/29/23 at 08:30AM a walkthrough of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 28 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to track and analyze infectious organisms related to its infection surveillance. The facility also failed to follow transmission-based precautions during wound care for Resident (R)169. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk related to infectious diseases. Findings included: - Review of the facility Antibiotic Stewardship Surveillance Logbook from July 2022 to July 2023 revealed that the contributing organism was not being tracked with trends noted on the surveillance log. On 08/31/23 at 09:25 AM Administrative Nurse E stated she was the Infection Preventionist since September 2022 and was certified since December 2022. Administrative Nurse E stated she had not been told that the causative organism or bacteria needed to be listed or tracked. Administrative Nurse E stated she was taught that only the antibiotic needed to be listed with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 28 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two residents reviewed for treatment/services to prevent/heal pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pressure reducing measures according to the plan of care were implemented for Resident (R) 69's bilateral lower extremities and a cushion in the wheelchair to prevent worsening of pressure ulcers. This placed R69 at increased risk for pressure ulcer development and worsening of right heel pressure ulcer. Findings included: - R69's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of need for assistance for personal care, diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 28 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one reviewed for bowel and bladder management. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement individualized interventions to improve Resident (R)167's bladder incontinence or prevent further loss. This deficient practice placed R167 at risk for complications related to incontinence. Findings Included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R167's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), repeated falls, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), neuralgia (severe nerve pain), and insomnia (inability to sleep). A review of the EMR indicated R167 admitted on [DATE]. No Minimum Data Set (MDS) or Care Area Assessments were completed for R167.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 28. The sample included 13 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement monitoring for behaviors and side effects associated with Residents (R)9's psychotropic medications (class of medications that chemically alter the brain to effect mood, perception, and behaviors). This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for ineffective treatment and unnecessary side effects. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R9's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), hallucinations (sensing things while awake that appear to be real, but the mind created), and obstructive sleep apnea (absence of breathing). R9's Quarterly Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 28 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label Resident (R)218's insulin (hormone which allows cells throughout the body to uptake glucose) pen with the date opened and discard date and failed store his medications securely. This placed R218 at risk for ineffective or diverted medications. Findings included: - On 08/29/23 at 07:10 AM an observation in the cabinet outside of R218's room revealed an unlocked medication storage drawer that contained the following: R218's Humalog (fast-acting insulin) pen. The pen lacked a date opened, and discard date. R218's Lantus (long-acting insulin) pen. The pen lacked a date opened, and discard date. Seven cards that contained various prescription medications. The inside of the cabinet door revealed a sign that documented insulin expired 28 days after opening. On 08/29/23at 07:23 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) I stated medication drawers should be locked if not being used. She stated that the insulin pens were R218's home medications, and she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 21 residents. The sample included 15 residents with five residents reviewed for food services. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to serve food at an appetizing temperature to resident (R) 8, R11, R12, R13, and R123. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for decreased nutrition and a delay in recovery. Findings Include: - The electronic medical record (EMR) documented the following diagnosis for R8: fracture of right tibia, osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), acute respiratory failure, hypercholesterolemia (greater than normal amounts of cholesterol in the blood), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), insomnia (inability to sleep), malaise (vague uneasy feeling of body weakness, distress or discomfort), hypoosmolality (decrease in the levels of electrolytes, chemicals, and other fluids in the blood required for adequate functioning), and hyponatremia (low sodium levels in the blood), and protein-calorie malnutrition ( body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 9 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 21 residents with one kitchen and one main dining room. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary food services and failed to document the daily cleaning and sanitation process. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for food borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings Include: - During the initial inspection of the kitchen on 01/25/22 at 07:15 AM the facility's dishwasher sanitation log was missing documentation in December of 2021 for 13 dates (12/13, 12/14,12/17, 12/18, 12/19, 12/21, 12/22, 12/24, 12/25, 12/26, 12/29, 12/30, and 12/31). An inspection of the main oven and fryer area revealed grease covering the top surfaces of the fryer and oven. Several old, cooked French fries sat in area between top burners and fryer. The inside of the oven was covered in a black grease residue with cooked food debris on floor of the oven. The spice rack on the rear wall had dust and spice particles covering the rack and spice bottles. The trash can lid in the oven area had a red sauce dried on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 21 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff did appropriate hand hygiene in between cares for residents and proper disinfecting of equipment used in between resident cares. This deficient practice placed the residents at risked for increased infection and transmission of communicable disease. Findings included: - Observation on 01/26/22 07:43 AM Certified Medication Aid (CMA) S failed to do hand hygiene between rooms 21 to room [ROOM NUMBER] and she used the vital machine on room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] without disinfecting the blood pressure cuff or pulse oximeter after use. Observation on 01/27/22 08:08 AM unidentified facility direct care staff removed a Hoyer lift (a mechanical lift used to raise and aide in transferring residents from one place to another) from room [ROOM NUMBER] and placed into room [ROOM NUMBER] without disinfecting the equipment. On 01/27/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 21 residents. The sample included 15 residents with two residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)12 an alternate method of summoning assistance which relayed directly to nursing staff during a call light system failure on 01/20/22. The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for a delay in care or assistance. Findings included: -The electronic medical records (EMR) documented the following diagnosis for R12: congestive heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), hypertension (high blood pressure), hypokalemia (low potassium levels in the blood), acute kidney failure, osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), and chronic pain. A review of R12's admission Minimum Data Set dated 01/11/22 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 21 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement a person-centered care plan that included the minimum information necessary to properly care for one resident (R), R14 who required off-site dialysis services, and failed to implement a baseline care plan for R18 who required the use of pressure reducing devices, which had the potential for R14 and R18 to have unmet care needs. Findings included: - R14's electronic medical record (EMR) documented under the Diagnoses tab diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), end stage renal disease (ESRD- a state in which there has been irreversible loss of renal function which requires dialysis), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 21 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with one resident reviewed for pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed ensure pressure reducing measures were placed on Resident (R) 18's bilateral lower extremities to prevent pressure ulcers. This placed R18 at increased risk for pressure ulcer development. Findings included: - R18's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and cerebrovascular accident (CVA- stroke, sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 21 residents. The sample included 15 residents. One resident (R) was sampled for dialysis (a procedure using a machine to remove excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally). Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services, and failed to monitor R14's dialysis access port (a vascular access to the bloodstream) daily, which had the potential for unwarranted and unidentified physical complications related to dialysis. Findings included: - R14's electronic medical record (EMR) documented under the Diagnoses tab diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), end stage renal disease (ESRD- a state in which there has been irreversible loss of renal function which requires dialysis), type…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 21 residents. The sample included 15 residents, which five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure antihypertensive medications (class of medication used to treat high blood pressure) were administered as ordered and physician notification for blood sugar outside ordered parameters for Resident (R) 120. This placed R120 at risk for unnecessary medication use and unwarranted side effects. Findings included: - R120's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) was in progress. R120's Care Area Assessment (CAA) was in progress. R120's Care Plan dated 01/15/22 documented he would be free from any signs or symptoms of hyperglycemia. The Care Plan documented he would be free from discomfort or preventable adverse reactions related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 21 residents. The sample included 15 residents with one resident reviewed for food preferences. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide R11 with food ordered on his dietary menu and did not notify of changes or substitutions to his meal. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for malnutrition and impaired quality of life. Findings included: -The electronic medical record (EMR) documented the following diagnosis for R11: hypertension (high blood pressure), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness), hypothyroidism (condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland), Irritable bowel syndrome (abnormally increased motility of the small and large intestines), constipation (difficulty passing stools), malaise (vague uneasy feeling of body weakness, distress or discomfort), fibromyalgia (condition of musculoskeletal pain, spasms, stiffness, fatigue and severe sleep disturbance), anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 21 residents. The sample included 15 residents with one resident reviewed for dietary drinks. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide R11 with drinks during meal service. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for dehydration and health complications. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) documented the following diagnosis for R11: hypertension (high blood pressure), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness), hypothyroidism (condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland), Irritable bowel syndrome (abnormally increased motility of the small and large intestines), constipation (difficulty passing stools), malaise (vague uneasy feeling of body weakness, distress or discomfort), fibromyalgia (condition of musculoskeletal pain, spasms, stiffness, fatigue and severe sleep disturbance), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.0+2.0 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 52.8+2.2 vs chain
The other 91 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Edgebrook Care CenterEdgerton, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan - IndianolaIndianola, IA 1 of 5Good Samaritan - Red OakRed Oak, IA 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - AtkinsonAtkinson, NE 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - BlackduckBlackduck, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Grand Island VillageGrand Island, NE 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - LakotaLakota, ND 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Mary Jane BrownLuverne, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - St Luke's VillageKearney, NE 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - WindomWindom, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society De SmetDe Smet, SD 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society MillerMiller, SD 1 of 5Salem Lutheran HomeElk Horn, IA 1 of 5Souris Valley Care CenterVelva, ND 1 of 5St Vincent's - A Prospera CommunityBismarck, ND 1 of 5Sunset Drive - a Prospera CommunityMandan, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan - AtwoodAtwood, KS 2 of 5Good Samaritan - Decatur CountyOberlin, KS 2 of 5Good Samaritan - EsthervilleEstherville, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan - MansonManson, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan - OttumwaOttumwa, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan - WaukonWaukon, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - BottineauBottineau, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Hastings VillageHastings, NE 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - OakesOakes, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Park RiverPark River, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care CommunityRobbinsdale, MN 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - St John'sKearney, NE 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - St Martin VillageRapid City, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - SuperiorSuperior, NE 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Waconia And Westview AcreWaconia, MN 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society CantonCanton, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society Luther ManorSioux Falls, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society New UnderwoodNew Underwood, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls CenterSioux Falls, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls VillageSioux Falls, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan-LiberalLiberal, KS 2 of 5The Good Samaritan Society-Kissimmee VillageKissimmee, FL 3 of 5Good Samaritan - AlgonaAlgona, IA 3 of 5Good Samaritan - DavenportDavenport, IA

Showing 40 of 91; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CEDAR LAKE VILLAGE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/20/2006
OLATHE MEDICAL CENTER INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 01/01/2019
THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 01/01/2019
KARAS, ALEXANDRIAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/27/2017
BOWEN, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/20/1998
BRADLEY, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/20/1998
FITZGERALD, RANDYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/02/2014
HERDINA, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/09/2013
SYVERSON, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/02/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 38%Other / private 62%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$595per resident / day
operating cost
$18,083per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$524per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175491. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next