Complete Care at Heritage LLC
7232 German Hill Road, Dundalk, MD 21222 · For profit - Corporation · 177 certified beds · (410) 282-6310 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $129,919 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-26)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.4% | 20.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 24.5% | 22.8% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.5% | 22.2% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.0% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 5.9% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.9% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.0% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 63.3% | 80.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.7% | 21.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.4% | 9.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.45 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.98 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 272 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 58.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 112 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.0%CMS range 47.6–59.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 8.0–13.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 58.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.7%CMS range 6.4–12.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 177 beds and averages 145.3 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
72 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 59 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of a facility reported incident, review of administrative and medical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of a significant medication error when a nurse incorrectly administered the medication Methadone to a resident instead of the prescribed medication Methylphenidate. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for unnecessary medications during a complaint survey. The failure of the facility to ensure that Resident #1 was free of a significant medication error resulted in the determination of an immediate jeopardy situation being identified on February 25, 2025, at 6 PM. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility after a brief hospital stay on 01/26/25 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Narcolepsy, muscle weakness and recurrent falls. On 01/28/25, the plan for Resident #1 was to be discharged home. Review of facility reported incident #MD00214721 revealed Resident #1 received 100 milligrams of Methadone on 02/15/25 between 12 noon and 1 PM.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record reviews, staff, and family interviews, it was determined the facility failed to: 1.) correctly assess a resident for smoking independently to include an accurate account of incidents of past unsafe smoking behaviors; 2) provide increased supervision and safety interventions after multiple unsafe smoking incidents; 3) keep a resident who had multiple smoking-related incidents from igniting flammable materials and safe from self-harm. This was evident for 1 of 4 (#92) residents reviewed for smoking. As a result of the deficient practice, residents were placed at risk for harm/injury causing an immediate jeopardy. The facility also failed to protect a resident who was totally dependent on staff for all aspects of activities of daily living, from an accident with injury (Resident #144). The failure resulted in harm to the resident who sustained a right arm fracture. The facility also failed to utilize the correct transfer tool to transfer a resident back to bed (R#157). This was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical records review, facility investigation review and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to protect cognitively impaired residents from physical, sexual, emotional, and verbal abuse which resulted in harm to Resident #144 and Resident #76. This was evident for 3 of 28 residents (Resident #144, #76, #103) reviewed for abuse during the survey. The Findings Include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of resident care. 1. Review of complaint MD00164757 on 8/18/23 at 12:54 PM revealed that on March 5, 2021, Resident #144 had her/his hair shaven to the scalp causing him/her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 5 (#5, #4, #2, #1, #14) of 14 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident.1) On 2/20/26 at 8:46 AM a review of Resident #5's medical record was conducted. Review of Resident #5's December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the administration of Gabapentin every 8 hours for neuropathy. Gabapentin is classified as an anticonvulsant drug and is commonly used to treat nerve pain as well as partial seizures.Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to protect a resident from verbal abuse from facility staff (Resident #8). This was evident for 1 of 11 residents reviewed for abuse during a complaint survey. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following this incident and prior to the start of this survey. The facilities plan and action were verified during this survey, therefore this deficiency was found to be past noncompliance with a compliance date of 12/5/25. The findings include: Review on 2/24/26 of a facility reported incident that occurred on 11/29/25 revealed Staff #19 (geriatric nursing assistant) witnessed Staff #25 (licensed practical nurse) tell Resident #8 hit me you (expletive language), you not gonna do (expletive language), I will beat the (expletive language) out of you. Staff #19 notified Staff #20 (nursing supervisor) who responded to the situation and also witnessed Staff #25 tell Resident #8 he will beat (expletive language) out of you. Review of Resident #8's medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interviews, and record review the facility failed to give Resident #12 a shower on Tuesday and Friday as ordered for the month of January 2026 and February of 2026. This was evident for one (Resident #12) of 1 resident reviewed for ADLs during the complaint survey. The Findings Include: An interview was conducted with the responsible party (RP) of Resident #12 on 2/20/26 at approximately 2PM. The RP of Resident # 12 complained that the Resident has had no shower in the last 2 months. An interview was held with Resident #12 on 2/20/26 at 12:30PM who is alert and oriented and can make his/her needs known. Resident #12 also stated he/she has had no shower in the last 2 months and stated he/she wanted a shower. There was one time in [DATE] that the resident refused a shower/bed bath because he/she had diarrhea. The Surveyor reviewed the treatment and GNA (Geriatric Nursing Assistant) record and the documentation showed Resident # 12 has only received a bed bath, but not a shower. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician (Resident #13). This was evident for 1 of 14 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include:Review of Resident #13's medical record on 2/24/26 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in December 2025 with a diagnosis to include acute prostatitis. Acute prostatitis is a sudden, severe bacterial infection of the prostate gland, often causing intense pain, fever, and urgent urinary symptoms. Review of Resident #13's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was ordered Ertapenem 1 gm intravenous antibiotic every day to end on 1/30/26. Review of Resident #13's January 2026 Medication Administration Record revealed the Resident did not receive Ertapenem on 1/30/26.Further review of Resident #13's physician ordered revealed the Resident's antibiotic was changed from Ertapenem to Meropenem 2 gm intravenous antibiotic every 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory services in accordance with professional standards of practice (Resident #1 and #13). This was evident for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory services during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #13's medical record on 2/24/26 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in December 2025 with a diagnosis to include Obstructive sleep apnea. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a sleep disorder characterized by repeated episodes of complete (apnea) or partial (hypopnea) collapse of the upper airway, causing oxygen desaturation or sleep arousal. Review of Resident #13's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was to continue on BiPAP for sleep. BiPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) is a noninvasive ventilation device used to treat breathing difficulties, such as sleep apnea, by delivering pressurized air through a mask. Review of Resident #13's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary and homelike environment for their residents. This was evident for 1) 1 of 2 nursing units in the facility and 2) observation of the laundry room during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:1) On 9/8/25 at 3:31PM during the initial rounding in the facility, the surveyor observed that the bathroom ceiling in room [ROOM NUMBER] was busted inwards where the water sprinkler was located about 10x4 inches long. Further observation of the ceiling on the second-floor hallway by the medication room and janitor's closet were three vents. All three were covered in dust and had multiple rusty brown colored stains plastered all over.On 9/10/25 at 8:55 AM, Staff #10, a maintenance director, in an interview, was asked if they round on the floors in the building and he said they do so daily. He was asked what they look out for during the rounds, and he said everything, mainly safety issues…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label oxygen (02) tubing with change dates. This was evident for 7 (#44, #127, #153, #149, #116, #76, #91) of 7 residents reviewed for respiratory care during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: A nasal cannula is a device that delivers oxygen directly to a person's nose through a flexible plastic tube that is attached to a piece of equipment that provides oxygen. The plastic tube can harbor bacteria and mold. It is important to change the tubing to prevent the spread of germs and to maintain health and safety during oxygen therapy. Staff should label the tube with a date to indicate when it had been changed. 1) On 9/8/25 at 8:30 AM during the initial rounding on the units, the following residents were noted to be on oxygen (O2) therapy: Resident #44, #127, #153 and #149. All 4 residents had their O2 tubing used to deliver O2 through the nose connected to a humidifier at the bedside but none of the O2 tubes were labelled with a date to indicate when it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of employee files and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a system to ensure newly hired Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) were competent in their skill sets. This deficiency was evident in four (GNA #15, # 17, 36, and #37) out of five GNA employee files reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey.Findings include:According to the American Nurses Association, nursing competence is an expected level of performance that combines knowledge, skills, abilities, and judgment.On 9/11/25 at 9:40 AM, a surveyor reviewed five randomly selected GNA employee files. The reviewed revealed four employees did not have records showing their competencies were verified upon hire: GNA #15 (hired March 2023), GNA #17 (hired December 2022), GNA #36 (hired September 2023), and GNA #37 (hired July 2024).During an interview on 9/11/25 at 2:05 PM, Staff #3 (an educator) confirmed that GNA skills are required to be verified before they can begin working on a unit. When the surveyor reviewed the files for GNAs #15, #17, #36, and #37 with Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to process linen in such a manner as to prevent infection, evidence by staff not wearing a protective gown to sort dirty linens and having drinks and personal items on the clean folding table next to clean laundry. This was observed during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On 9/12/25 at 9:30 AM an observation of the laundry room revealed 2 folding tables located to the left and right side of the room. On the clean folding table to the right was observed a large (20 oz) cup of ice coffee about 1/4 full lying on the table, a cell phone plugged in to an electric outlet charging on the table, 3 lunch bags, and a table fan with the blade cover removed and the blades covered in dust.On the clean folding table to the left was observed an open can of cold breeze berry energy drink about 3/4 full, a Remedy essential cleanse shampoo and body wash, an open packet of Twizzlers pull and peel candy (orange cream top), a lunch bag and a cell phone.In an interview with Staff #31 a laundry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-16 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observations and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This was observed during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:During the survey several observations were made of gnats in the building. On the first day of the survey on 9/8/25 at 7:35 AM, surveyors were placed in the facility's conference room with multiple flying gnats observed in the room. On 9/8/25 at 9:10 AM during initial rounds, the surveyor observed a brown insect and gnat flying around the resident in Room125. The resident tried to swat them and missed. S/he stated flies are a problem.Throughout the survey conducted from 9/8/25 through 9/16/25, there were observations made each day of gnats in the conference room. An interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director on 9/10/25 at 8:57 AM. During the interview he stated the facility had an insect/pest maintenance program by a company called Allstate who comes weekly. When…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 59 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of medical records and interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure that two physicians' certificates of incapacity were obtained and that Advance Directives were completed in accordance with the Health Care Decisions Act. This was evident for one resident (Resident #1) out of the four residents reviewed for advance directives during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings included:On 9/08/25 at 1:29 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #1's medical records. The review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in August 2025 with an altered mental status. The form named physician certification related to medical condition, substitute decision making and treatment limitation was completed on 8/14/25 by one physician, who noted that the resident was unable to make decisions due to a state of confusion. However, a second physician's signature was missing.During an interview with Staff #5 (Social Worker) on 9/09/25 at 9:14 AM, she explained the process for physicians' certification regarding residents' decision-making…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility records and interview with staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to: 1) immediately report an allegation of suspected resident abuse and 2) timely report allegations of abuse to the State Survey Agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This was evident for 1 (Resident #42) of 35 residents reviewed for intakes during the facility's recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:The OHCQ is the agency within the Maryland Department of Health charged with monitoring the quality of care in Maryland's health care facilities and community-based programs. Allegations of abuse, serious bodily injury, and misappropriation of resident property are to be reported to the OHCQ in a timely manner (within 2 hours for the initial report and within 5 working days for the final report).A facility reported incident involving Resident #42 was reviewed on 9/15/25 at 6:00 AM. The facility report indicated that facility staff, Guest Services Director (GSD) became aware of the allegation of verbal abuse on 12/11/24 at 8:59 AM. Further review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the matrix, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments diagnoses were updated. This was evident for 3 (Residents #82, #113, and #13) residents identified with a diagnosis of COVID on the matrix out of 74 resident records reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey process. The findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Active diagnoses documented on the MDS assessment should correlate with an accurate picture of the resident's current health status.The Facility Matrix is a tool used for assessing the care needs of residents and contains the active diagnoses pulled from the MDS. It also identifies care categories used to determine the appropriate level of care and resources required for each resident. The matrix is completed by the facility and must reflect all residents on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview with family, a review of resident medical records, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to hold care plan meetings at least quarterly. This was evident for 2 (Resident #13, # 2) out of 4 residents reviewed for care plans during the facility's recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: Care plans are developed for residents to guide the care that residents receive in the facility. They are required to be developed within 7 days of completion of a resident's admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and revised at least every quarter (or more often as needed). The facility is required to have care plans developed and revised by an interdisciplinary team including: the attending physician, a registered nurse, a nursing aide, a representative from dietary services, the resident, and the resident's representative (as practicable). 1) On 9/8/25 at 12:44 PM, Resident #13's responsible party (RP) was interviewed. During the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with residents, review of medical records, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that facility nursing staff failed to follow professional standards of nursing practice when documenting medications given to residents. This was evident for 1 (Resident #102) out of 2 residents reviewed for timely medication administration during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:It is the standard of nursing practice to document administered medications immediately after administration. Failure to do so can result in an inaccurate medical record where it cannot be determined when a medication was given and therefore has the potential to result in medication errors (such as a resident receiving a dose twice or two doses of a medication being given too close in time).On 9/8/2025 at 9:42 AM in an interview with Resident #102 s/he stated that the facility staff waited until his/her pain medications ran out or almost ran out before reordering them and so s/he received the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with residents, review of medical records, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide care and services to maintain or improve a resident's ability to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) of 2 residents reviewed for rehabilitative or restorative services during the facility's recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:ADLs are the basic, essential self-care tasks individuals perform to maintain their daily lives such as hygiene, eating, mobility, and toileting.On 9/8/25 at 8:32 AM in an interview with Resident #6 s/he stated s/he had requested an exercise band several times and was not provided with one. When asked who s/he made the request to s/he stated some aides and nurses, both of whom said Rehab [rehabilitation department: physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), and speech therapy] would have to make that determination. S/he stated a nursing staff member coordinated a phone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and a medical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide personal hygiene services to totally dependent residents. This was evident in 2 (Residents #96 and #42) of the 5 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a standardized screening and assessment tool for the health status of all residents in long-term care facilities that are certified to participate in Medicare or Medicaid. Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) are the basic, essential self-care tasks people need to perform to maintain their health, safety, and well-being, such as bathing, dressing, eating, and toileting. 1) During a phone interview on 9/08/25 at 9:53 AM. with Resident #96's responsible party, they reported that the resident had long toenails, and one had fallen off. On 9/10/25 at 11:23 AM, a surveyor observed Resident #96's toenail with Staff #21 (Registered Nurse).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint intake, resident and staff interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide quality of care services to their resident secondary to a delay in medication administration and wound treatments. This was evident for 2 (Residents #2, #174) of 37 residents reviewed for medication administration and wound treatment during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: 1) On 09/11/2025 at 2:39 PM review of a complaint incident #2580727 alleged that Resident #2's medications are given late and that this happens a lot. In an Interviews with Resident #2 on 9/9/25 at 9:30AM regarding late medication administration. The resident blamed it on the agency staff that the facility frequently uses and stated that his/her medications are given late most of the time. On 9/9/25 at 9:45 AM a review of the August 2025 Medication administration records (MAR) did confirm that numerous medications (Meds) were given 2-4 hours late on different days. For instance, on:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate fall risk assessments for residents who experienced frequent falls. This was evident in the cases of 3 residents (Resident #15, #16, and # 94) out of the five reviewed for fall risks during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings included: 1) During an interview with Resident #15 on 9/08/25, at 8:41 AM, the resident reported a fall that led to a hospital transfer a couple of months prior. An observation of the resident's room revealed the bed was high, with no fall mat or other precautions in place. A review of Resident #15's medical record on 9/09/25, at 1 PM, showed the resident was found on the floor beside the bed on 7/22/25, at 9:23 PM. The resident complained of hip pain and was transferred to the hospital for evaluation. Imaging at the hospital revealed a partial dislocation of the left arm and a compression fracture in the spine. The resident was re-admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the resident's medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to address a significant weight loss for a resident. This was evident for one (Resident #9) of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:During an interview with Resident #9 on 09/08/25 at 11:10 AM, the resident reported a weight loss.A review of Resident #9's medical records on 09/09/25 at 8:32 AM revealed that the resident had experienced significant weight loss multiple times while residing in this facility: On 03/12/25, weight was 127.2 lbs. (via mechanical lift). On 03/27/25, weight was 111.4 lbs. (via mechanical lift). This was a loss of 15.8 lbs. (12.4%) within 15 days. The resident remained in the facility and was not transferred to a hospital or for a procedure. On 06/06/25, weight was documented as 105.2 lbs. (via wheelchair). On 06/11/25, weight was 100 lbs. (via lift). This was a loss of 5.2 lbs. (4.9%) within 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on investigating complaints, medical record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide pain management timely. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #178) out of 10 residents reviewed for pain management during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: A complaint review on 09/11/25 at 9:00 AM showed that a complainant reported that Resident #178 experienced severe pain from approximately 9:00 PM on 05/12/24 until 10:20 AM on 05/13/24. The resident was reported to have cried and screamed in pain, but no pain assessment or medication was provided. On 9/11/25 at 9:57 AM, a review of Resident #178's medical records revealed that the resident was alert and oriented with a BIMS score of 15/15. A progress notes dated on 5/12/24 at 10:58 AM documented that the resident complained of bilateral leg pain with a pain level of 10/10, indicating severe pain. Additional progress noted dated 5/12/24 at 15:10 (3:10 PM) documented that “…MD ordered routine typenol 1000mg q 12 hrs and Tylenol 650 mg q 6 PRN (as needed), Tylenol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to properly label and store drugs and biologicals. This was evident in 2 of 4 medication carts observed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: According to the CDC and American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommend refrigerating unopened insulin at 36-46 F (2-8 C) until the expiration date, while opened insulin vials can be kept at room temperature (below 86 F or 30 C) for about 28 days, depending on the manufacturer's guidelines. The standard of practice requires that, when opened, a vial or pen of insulin would be labeled with both an opened date and or a discard after date which is 28 days later.On [DATE] at 10:55 AM, during an observation of the 2nd floor East Hall medication Cart accompanied by Staff #35 (Agency Nurse) revealed the following: 1) A unsealed Lantus 100 unit/ml vial labeled with Resident #192's name and not labeled with the date it was opened.2) An opened box of Ipratropium/Solution Albuterol (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, review of facility report incidents, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure residents' clinical records were complete and accurate. This was evident for 3 (Residents #4, #137, #190) residents out of the 74 in the survey sample of the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) During a recertification/ complaint survey conducted from 09/08/2025 through 09/16/2025 a review of facility complaint MD# 333479 was conducted. Review of the intake information revealed that the Baltimore County Fire Department was requested by the facility for a potential overdose of Resident #190 on 09/25/24. The Emergency Medical Response team complained that the facility did not allow them to review the residents' medication administration sheets. On 9/11/25 at 10:01 AM a review of the Resident #190's medical record noted that Oxycodone HCL Oral Tablet 10 MG (Oxycodone HCl) was ordered on 9/13/24, discontinued on 9/17/24 and reordered on 9/17/24 and placed on hold on 9/25/24 to 9/26/24. The narcotic count sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer pneumococcal vaccine as appropriate for residents. This was evident for 1(Resident #2) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On 9/12/15 at 1:00 PM a review of Resident #2's immunization records failed to show that a pneumococcal vaccine which protects against Pneumonia, a lung infection, was offered to the resident or that resident refused and was educated.On 9/12/25 at 2:15PM Staff #3 the Infection Preventionist (IP) was asked if the facility offers the Pneumococcal vaccine to their residents. She stated that they do offer it on admission. She was asked if Residents #2 was offered the vaccine and she said she will check.On 9/15/25 at 10:44 AM Staff #3 provided a Pneumococcal vaccine Informed consent form dated 9/15/25 and said that the vaccine was not offered initially to the resident on admission and that she just spoke with Resident #2 who consented to get the pneumonia vaccine. She was made aware that it was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to offer COVID-19 immunization as required or appropriate for residents. This was evident for 2 (Residents #1 and #2) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations during the recertification/complaint surveyThe findings include:A Covid -19 vaccine is a vaccine intended to provide acquired immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2.On 9/12/15 at 1:00 PM review of Resident #1 and #2's immunization records failed to show that a Covid 19 vaccine was offered to the residents or that both refused and were educated. Further review did not produce the missing documents.On 9/12/25 at 2:15PM Staff #3 the Infection Preventionist (IP) was asked if the facility offered Covid -19 immunizations to their residents and she said they do and explained that they offer it on admission. She was asked if both residents were offered the Covid-19 Immunization on admission and she said she would check and get back to the surveyor.On 9/15/25 at 10:44 AM Staff #3 provided two Covid-19 vaccine consent forms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of employee files and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate the implementation of a process to track nurse aide participation in required training's to ensure all nurses' aides received 12 hours of training that included abuse prevention and Dementia management, annually and addressed areas of weakness as determined in nurse aides' performance reviews. This was evident for 2 (GNA # 16 and #17) of 5 employees' files reviewed during this recertification/complaint survey.The findings included:On 9/11/25 at 9:40 AM, a surveyor reviewed five randomly selected Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) employee files, which revealed the following: GNA #16: Hired in July 2024, this employee's training records show that the second page of their abuse and neglect prevention training was not completed on 7/17/24. GNA #17: Hired in December 2022, this employee's training records contained no evidence that they received the required training in 2023.During an interview with Staff #3 (an educator) and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 9/11/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to provide a clean and comfortable environment for residents. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility and was found to be evident during the facility's Medicare/ Medicaid recertification survey. Findings include: On 7/18/23 at approximately 11:00 AM, an observation was made of the hallways on the first and second floor. The rugs, that were the length of the entire hallway, had large dark brown stains noted throughout length of the carpet. There was also a pungent odor present. The surveyor walked the hallways with the Director of Nursing (DON), and she confirmed that the carpet in the hallways needed cleaning and that the carpet would be replaced. On 7/19/23 at 1:15 PM, an observation was made of the linen carts on the first floor hallway. There were large dark colored drippings noted on the side covers of the cart. There was linen on the shelves of the cart. An environmental staff, that was in the hall at the time, was asked who was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on administrative record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to 1.)perform quarterly interdisciplinary care plan meetings for Resident # 92, 2.) update the care plan to the address the specific needs for Resident # 103, a cognitively impaired resident that experienced sexual contact by a cognitively intact resident, and for resident # 166 that was administered Narcan for substance abuse. This was found to be evident for 3 of 90 residents reviewed during the investigation stage of the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. Findings include, 1. On 07/24/23 at 2:57 PM, a review of Resident #92's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident did not have quarterly care plan meetings. The most recent meeting was held on 07/13/23 at 2:10 PM. The care plan meeting prior was held on 12/28/22 at 1:30 PM. The meeting prior to the December 2022 meeting was held on 08/24/22. During an interview with Licensed Master Social Worker (LMSW) #26 on 07/24/23 at 3:11 PM, they stated that resident care plan meetings are held quarterly. When…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility, 1.) failed to ensure that medications were administered to residents (#684, and # 438) as prescribed by the physician, 2.) failed to ensure that psychiatric consultations were done as ordered by the physician for resident (#123 and # 103) and 3.) failed to ensure that a Peripherally Inserted Central Line (PICC) was removed for resident (# 165) prior to discharge. This was evident for 5 residents of 90 residents reviewed during the investigation stage of the facility's annual Medicaid/Medicare survey. The findings include the following: 1. Ezetimibe is a medication used to lower high cholesterol levels. O 07/14/23 at 9:00 AM, a review of resident's (#684) medical record revealed that a physician ordered on 12/08/2022 to administer medication Ezetimibe tab 10 mg, give 1 tab by mouth one time a day, for cholesterol. Review of the 06/2023 Medication Administration Record, on 06/18/2023, 06/19/ 2023 and 06/21/2023 revealed that medication Ezetimibe was not documented as given to resident. On 7/14/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of medical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1.) ensure pharmacy recommendations to nursing were addressed during the monthly pharmacy reviews 2.) ensure the monthly reviews were reviewed by the physician and that the physician acted on and addressed irregularities identified by the pharmacist. This was found to be evident for 3 (R#106, #37 and # 10 ) out of the 5 residents sampled for medication regimen review during the facility's Medicare/Medicaid recertification survey. The findings include: 1. On 8/4/23, Resident #106's medical records were reviewed and revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in September 2023 for long term care. Review of the medication revealed the following: Hydroxyzine as needed, Seroquel, Remeron and Venlafaxine. Continued medical record review revealed that, on 12/29/22, 3/21/23, 6/29/23, the pharmacist recommended an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) test be performed at least every 6 months due to the prescribed medication Seroquel, an antipyschotic. Antipsychotics…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medication administration observation, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 %. This was evidenced by 6 errors observed during the medication administration of 31 opportunities for errors, that resulted in a medication error rate of 19.35%. This was found to be evident for 3 (R #101, # 99 #55) out of 5 residents observed during the medication administration. The findings include: 1. On 7/10/23 at 11:30 AM, surveyor observed a red/pink medication administration screen during medication administration. The surveyor asked what that color screen indicated and LPN #100 revealed that it meant the medication was late or they hadn't signed off the medicine administration. On 7/10/23 at 11:40 AM, LPN #100 was observed on the 2nd floor nursing unit preparing the following medications for Resident #101: Depakote 500 milligram 2 times a day due at 9 am, given at 11:35 AM Keppra 750 milligram 2 times a day due 9am, given 11:37 AM Doxycycline 100 milligram by mouth 2 times day at 9 am,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on administrative record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that complete and accurate records were maintained for residents. This was found to be evident for 3 (Resident # 240, # 92, and # 438) of 90 residents reviewed during the investigation stage of the facility's Medicare/Medicaid recertification survey. Findings include: 1. Intake # MD00174320 was reviewed on 7/25/23 for allegations of abuse. According to the facility's investigation, on 11/13/21, GNA # 31 reported that upon entering the facility's dining room, she observed Resident # 103 sitting on the lap of Resident # 240 who was in a wheelchair. Resident # 240 was observed with his/her pants lowered and Resident # 103 was wearing a gown. The staff immediately separated the residents and notified the supervisor. The staff stated that she did not see any genitalia exposed from either resident. Skin checks were done, and no concerns were noted. On 7/26/23 at 1:00 PM, during an interview with the DON, she stated that Resident # 240 was placed on one-to-one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-22 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to that ensure 4 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA)s received the required 12 hours of in-service training. This was found to be evident for 4 (GNA #11, #21, # 53, # 56) out of 5 employees reviewed for annual GNA training reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 07/20/2023 at 10:17 AM, The Director of Nursing (DON) #2 presented the surveyor with copies of the educational and human resources records for 5 employees. A discussion was held with the DON and the nursing home administrator (NHA) regarding the annual training requirements for GNAs. A minimum of 12 hours of nurse aide training per year are required. A record review of the human resources files for the following staff members on 07/21/23 at 09:30 AM revealed: 1. Staff # 11, Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA's) human resources file failed to show the required 12-hour clinical training between 06/15/21 through 08/22/23. 2. Staff # 21, (GNA)'s human resources file failed to show the required 12-hour clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record, administrative review, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to: 1.) Promote respect and dignity of a cognitively impaired resident when an employee posted a picture of the resident on a mobile photo-sharing application and social network and 2.) promote care for a resident in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced the resident's dignity and respect. This was found to be true for 2 (R#48 #76) out of 5 residents reviewed for dignity. The finding include: 1. Medical records review on 8/8/23 at 1030 AM revealed that Resident #48 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Dementia and Depression. Review of the Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 4/17/23, revealed that the facility staff entered a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 out of 15. BIMS is an assessment that assists staff in determining a resident's cognitive status. A score of 00-07 indicates severe impairment. Review of the investigation notes revealed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dignified existence to a vulnerable resident. This deficient practice was evidenced in 1 (#92) of 2 residents reviewed for dignity during a Medicare/Medicaid recertification survey. The findings include: During the initial observation rounds on 07/10/23 at 9:52 am, the surveyor observed Resident #92 sitting on the side of the bed with his/her hair and clothes in disarray. There was a urinal on the bedside table and spilled urine on the floor near the distal part of the bed. The wheelchair had brown matter around both wheels. On 07/18/23 at 10:25 am, the surveyor went to Resident#92's room and observed him/her lying in bed; the bottom of his/her feet were brown. There were two 120 ml cups of urine on the bedside table. When the resident transferred to the wheelchair, the surveyor observed a large wet spot on the back of his/her pants and the resident's hair was not combed. On 07/18/23 at 11:29 am, during an interview with Director of Nursing #2 reported that every resident had a shower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on the medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the physician of a medication that was not administered to a resident. This was evident for 1 resident (#64) out of 8 residents reviewed at the time of the survey. The findings include the following: On 07/14/23 at 9:00 AM, review of resident #64's medical record revealed that a physician ordered on 12/08/2022 to administer Ezetimibe tab 10 mg give 1 tab by mouth one time a day for cholesterol. During the review of the 06/2023 Medication Administration Record, on 06/18/2023, 06/19/2023 and 06/21/2023, it was noted that medication Ezetimibe was not given to resident (#64). There was no documentation provided or found verifying that the doctor was made aware that the medication was not given. During an interview on 07/14/23 at 12:30 PM with Director of Nursing (DON) #2 , she stated that there was no documentation that the physician was made aware that the medication Ezetimibe was not administered to the resident (#64).
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on administrative and medical record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident was kept free from physical restraints. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 150) of 28 residents reviewed for abuse during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. Findings include: Intake # MD00188916 was reviewed on 8/8/23 for allegations of abuse. According to the facility's investigation and a statement by staff # 62, a Registered Nurse (RN) stated that, on 2/12/23, he placed a sheet around resident # 150's Geri chair and tucked a sheet and blanket snugly around the resident and brought the resident close to the nurse's station. Resident # 150 was redirected to sit down upon standing and staff # 62 stated the resident was not restrained. Review of resident # 150 care plan on the same date reveals the resident was resistive to care, had cognitive and self-care deficits, history of falls and poor balance. During an interview with staff # 63 on 8/8/23 at 3:03 PM, she stated that, on 2/12/23, resident # 150 kept…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on administrative and medical record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to report allegations of abuse to the State Office and Certification Agency. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident # 103 and Resident # 144) of 28 residents reviewed for abuse during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. Findings include: 1. Intake # MD00174320 was reviewed on 7/25/23 at 10:00 AM for allegations of abuse. According to the facility's investigation, staff # 31 reported observing resident # 103 sitting on the lap of resident # 240 who was sitting in their wheelchair. The two residents were alone in the dining room at the time of the observation. Resident # 240 was observed with his/her pants lowered and resident # 103 had on a gown. Staff # 31 immediately separated the residents. On 7/25/23 at 3:40 PM, a phone interview was conducted with staff # 31, a Geriatric Nurse Assistant (GNA) and she was asked about the incident that occurred on 11/13/21. She stated the following: On 11/13/21 at approximately 8:00 PM in the evening,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on administrative record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate abuse allegations. This was found to be evident for 1 Resident # 103 of 28 residents reviewed for abuse during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. Findings include: Intake # MD00188482 was reviewed on 7/25/23 at 10:00 AM for abuse allegations. According to the facility's investigation, staff # 31 reported observing resident # 103 sitting on the lap of resident # 240 who was sitting in their wheelchair. The two residents were alone in the dining room at the time of the observation. Resident # 240 was observed with his/her pants lowered and resident # 103 had on a gown. Staff # 31 immediately separated the residents. A phone interview was conducted with staff # 31, a Geriatric Nurse Assistant (GNA) on 7/25/23 at 3:40 PM and she was asked about the incident that occurred on 11/13/21 and she stated the following: On 11/13/21 at approximately 8:00 PM in the evening, she was going through the dining room to get to her locker, and she heard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents were ordered treatments according to professional nursing standards. This deficient practice was evidenced in 2 residents (#78, #238) of 3 records reviewed for oxygen and/or colostomy orders reviewed during the Medicare/Medicaid recertification survey. The findings include: According to the Maryland Nurse Practice Act guide that governs nursing practice in the state of Maryland. Registered Nurses, Licensed practical Nurses, and certificate holders are expected to practice within the established regulations defined by the Nurse Practice Act. According to 10.27.09.03 (A) (1) The RN systematically shall evaluate the quality and effectiveness of nursing practice in the aggregate. According to 10.27.10.02 B (1) (a) (c) (iii) the LPN contributes to the nursing assessment by collecting data of the client through direct observation; from the review of the client's medical records including, but not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, and family interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow their own policies and procedures related to the use of siderails Additionally, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for continued use of the siderails. This was evident for 1 of 1 (resident #144) reviewed for siderails. The findings include: Entrapment: An event where a resident becomes caught, trapped or entangled in the space in or about the bedrail. A review of Resident #144's medical record on 07/11/23 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in December 2018 and totally dependent upon staff. The attending physician determined the resident to be lacking decision-making capacity (the ability to consent to treatment) on 10/09/20. On 08/18/23 at 12:30 PM, a review of Resident #144's medical records revealed that on 12/15/18, the resident was admitted with an order for side rails, however, there was no indication for their use. On 12/17/18, the order was discontinued, however,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolatedEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) received training to become a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) within the required 4-month timeframe. This was evidenced in 1 of 5 CNA/GNA employee records reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: On 08/03/23 at 2:24 PM, during an interview with CNA#90, he/she reported receiving his/her CNA certificate in September 2022 and has been working at the facility since October 2022. On 08/03/23 at 2:45 PM, a review of CNA #90's employee file revealed the staff member was a CNA, which was confirmed on the Maryland Board of Nursing website. On 08/03/23 at 3:15 PM, during an interview with Director of Nursing #2, she stated the facility employed two CNA's. On 08/07/23 at 2:11 PM, during an interview with Human Resources Director (HRD) #16, the facility sponsored the two employees to go through a learning center to become Geriatric Nursing Assistants. They were supposed to see them through the certification process. HRD # 16 verbalized being aware…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staffing information was complete and accurate. This deficient practice was discovered during the Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: On 07/20/23 at 9:40 AM, a review of the assignment sheets received from the Director of Nursing #2 on 07/19/23 at 1:55 PM revealed the assignment sheets for 07/10/23 were not completed for Station 2 during 3PM -11 PM and 11PM-7AM shifts. The assignment sheet for 07/19/23 and 07/20/23 Station 1 7-3 PM shift were incorrect and did not have GNA #67 on the schedule. On 07/20/23 at 11:55 AM, the surveyor went to Station 1 to verify that GNA #67 was working, spoke with the Unit Manager (UM), LPN (#19) and she verbalized the GNA was working in the dining area assisting with lunch. The surveyor walked to the dining room and observed GNA # 67 in the dining area. The UM reported the staff was on light duty; she served the resident's drinks on the unit, assisted with giving meals, and does vital signs. She was not on the schedule because she was on light…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to keep a resident free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #106) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the facility's Medicare/Medicaid recertification survey. The findings include: On 8/3/23 at 11:30 AM, Resident #106's medical records were reviewed and revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with the following, but not limited to diagnoses: major depressive disorder (single episode) and anxiety disorder. Further review of the medical records revealed an order for Seroquel 200 milligram every night for depression, Mirtazapine 7.5 mg every night for depression and Venlafaxine 37.5 mg every day for depression. Continued review revealed a psychiatrist NP #97 note, dated 3/15/23, regarding follow-up on psychiatric issues of anxiety, depression, and insomnia and assessment, plan, orders and a recommendation to begin a slow gradual dose reduction of medication as the resident had been without any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and family and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free of significant medication error as evidenced by the failure of the nurse to verify the correct dosage and/or medication prior to administration. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 10) of 6 residents reviewed during the annual survey for medications. The findings include: Diazepam used to treat anxiety disorders and severe muscle spasms, and spasticity associated with neurologic disorders. Methadone is an opioid medication used to treat severe pain and opioid addiction. When used to treat severe pain, methadone is available as a tablet or oral solution. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Muscular Dystrophy (a group of diseases that cause progressive weakness and loss of muscle mass) and anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities). The resident was alert and oriented and cognitively intact. Complaint MD000179262 alleged that Resident #10 received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to store food and fluids in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, during the annual survey. The findings include the following: On 07/10/23 at 09:10 AM, An initial tour of the facility Kitchen was completed with Dietary Manager staff (#4) and the following was found: 1. Expired fluids noted in the facility's dry storage room that included: (6) boxes of Thickened Orange Juice from Concentrate, moderately thick that had expired on 06/14/2023. (4) boxes of Thickened Lemon-Flavored Water, moderately thick that had expired on 06/19/2023. (3) boxes of Thickened Apple Juice from Concentrate, moderately thick that had expired on 5/08/2023. 2. A bread crate containing bread was found directly on the facility's dry storage room floor. 3. Ice buildup was noted on the floor in the facility's kitchen walk-in freezer. 4. Raw meat was found uncovered in the facility's walk-in refrigerator (#1). 5. A red color substance was noted to have spilled all over metal shelves in the facility's walk- in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of medical records and facility policy, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an effective infection control precaution during an outbreak of COVID-19 in the facility. This was evidenced by a nursing staff entering a COVID-19 isolated room without applying adaptable Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). The findings include: An N95 mask (respirator) is a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles. On 10/23/23 at 08:10 AM, the facility's receptionist stated that the facility was currently in a COVID-19 outbreak. At 9:30 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed that some of the residents' rooms had a sign of contact/droplet precaution on the 2-south unit. In the hall of each unit, a PPE drawer was placed with disposable gowns, N-95 masks, and hand sanitizers. On 10/24/23 at 8:51 AM, the surveyor observed a Geriatric Nurse Aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain effective pest control as evidenced by gnats in the residents rooms. This deficient practice was evidenced in 2 resident rooms (234 & 236) during the annual survey. The findings include: During observation rounds on 07/10/23 at 09:31 AM, the surveyor observed dozens of gnats flying around the living space of Resident #42 in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The gnats were observed flying around the light above the bed, on left side of curtain of the bed, and the trashcan. On 07/10/23 at 9:35 AM, Occupational Therapy Assistant #13 confirmed the surveyor's findings. On 07/10/23 at 9:44 AM, while the surveyor was in room [ROOM NUMBER], gnats were observed flying around in the bathroom. On 07/20/23 at 12:59 PM, during an interview with Maintenance Director #29 the facility does have a contract with a pest control company. The last time the company had been in the facility was 07/14/23; they treated three rooms for gnats not including room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that annual 12-hour competency training and annual Dementia and Behavioral Health training for geriatric nursing assistants (GNAs) were provided. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that a computerized educational training program, Relias, was available to their staff to ensure mandatory annual training on abuse, resident neglect, and resident rights, as well as training related to the topics previously mentioned, were kept up to date for all employees. This was evident to be true for 4 (GNA #11, #21, # 53, # 56) out of 5 employees reviewed for annual GNA training. This deficient practice resulted in the facility employing GNAs who were not clinical prepared to care for all types of residents. The findings include: A review of the human resources files for the following staff members revealed: 1. Staff # 11, GNA's human resources file failed to show any dementia or behavioral health training completed between the years, 06/15/21 through 08/22/23. Additionally, the total number…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolatedProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the behavioral health and dementia training for geriatric nursing assistants (GNAs) were provided. This was evident to be true for 4 (GNA #11, #21, # 53, # 56) out of 5 employees reviewed for annual GNA training. The findings include: On 07/20/2023 at 10:17 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) #2 presented the surveyor with copies of the educational and human resources records for 5 employees. A discussion was held with the DON and the nursing home administrator (NHA) regarding the annual training requirements for GNAs. The NHA #1 stated that the facility was working with a hospice organization to create a dementia training program for all facility staff. The NHA #1 stated that staff members were not receiving dementia training (including GNAs). On 07/21/23, a review of the human resources files for the following staff members revealed: 1. Staff # 11, geriatric nursing assistant's (GNA) human resources file failed to show that any dementia or behavioral health training was completed between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview while conducting the initial kitchen tour and observation of the walk-in refrigerator, it was determined that the dietary and facility staff failed to maintain the refrigerated food in a clean and sanitary manner. The findings included: On 1-16-19 at 8:50 AM during the initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager: The walk-in refrigerator had Jello and pudding stored in individual bowls without a cover. The pureed oatmeal was half covered and the shelf above had dried debris and lunch meat stored. The dessert refrigerator had 2 carrot cakes stored with out a covering to prevent against contamination. These findings were discussed with the Dietary Manager on 1-16-19 during the tour.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a resident's (#105) privacy. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents investigated for dignity. The findings include: On 1-16-19 at 12:16 PM with Unit Manager #4 it was confirmed that the facility had thumb tacked to the bulletin board in their room a copy of Resident #105's physician orders, initial nursing assessment, and care plans. This private information was left in view of anyone in the room and was unsecured. Unit Manger #4 did not know why the information was left on the bulletin board.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-22 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to honor 2 resident's choices. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents (#131) selected for review for advanced directives and 1 of 4 (#28) resident reviewed for choices. The findings include: 1. Maryland Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) is a portable and enduring medical order form covering options for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and other life-sustaining treatments. The medical orders are based on a resident's wishes about medical treatments. Resident #131's MOLST dated 12-20-18 and completed with his/her physician stated he/she did not want to have medical tests performed including blood drawn for laboratory testing. The physician ordered laboratory tests to be performed on 12/20/18, 12-30-18, 1-1-19, 1-3-19, 1-6-19, and 1-8-19. During interview with Resident #131 at 9:50 AM revealed he/she Stated sure it's okay to draw blood for laboratory testing. During interview with Physician #3 on 1-18-19 at 12:40 PM stated he/she wrote the MOLST with no laboratory tests to be performed because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment. The findings include: 1. On 1/16/2019 at 9:40 AM surveyors observed cracked caulking around the bathroom sink of room [ROOM NUMBER]. 2. On 1/16/2019 at 11:55 AM surveyors observed soiled chairs along with multiple chips and holes in the walls of room [ROOM NUMBER]. 3. On 1/16/2019 at 12:55 PM surveyors observed spills and debris on the floor of room [ROOM NUMBER]. 4. On 1/17/2019 at 8:26 AM surveyors completed a walkthrough of room [ROOM NUMBER] and identified multiple environmental issues. The table acting as the residents TV stand in room [ROOM NUMBER] was soiled and had multiple brown stains from spilled drinks. The heating unit under the window was observed to have broken fins and the linens on Bed A had multiple brown stains. A pile of soiled, wet, white rags with brown stains was observed piled in the corner of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom. The rim of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-22 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed staff to provide residents and or their representative (RP) with the proper paper documentation of the facilities bed hold policy. This was evident for 1 (Resident 142) out of 3 residents reviewed for discharge during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: A bed hold policy is written information to the resident or resident representative that specifies the duration that the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. It is given before a nursing facility transfers a resident to a hospital or the resident goes out on therapeutic leave. A medical record review for Resident #142 was conducted on 01/22/19 at 8:30 AM. Review of a progress note written on 10/14/18 revealed that the resident had an unplanned transfer to an acute care hospital. Further review of the medical record revealed that a copy of the facility's bed hold policy was not given to the resident or their RP. During an interview with the Administrator on 01/22/2019 at 1:15 PM she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to initiate, provide and implement comprehensive care plans for residents. This was evident for 3 (Residents #23, #342 and #13) of 54 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1. Medical record review for Resident #23 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but not limited to seizures. A seizure is a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain. It can cause changes in your behavior, movements or feelings, and in levels of consciousness. It was further noted; the facility staff assessed the resident on 10/9/18 and 1/8/19 and completed on the MDS-Section I 5400-Active Diseases: Y-Seizure Disorder- Yes. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the federally mandated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-22 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure medical appointments were made for the residents (#52). This was true for 1 out of the 1 resident reviewed for communication and sensory issues. The findings are: Resident #52 was interviewed on 1/16/19 at 9:36 AM. Resident stated he/she was supposed to have had an appointment for glasses but has not as of that date. A review of the clinical record revealed that the primary physician wrote an order on 10/31/18 for: Please schedule for next optometrist appt & Podiatry. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 1/22/19 at 11:06 AM. She was shown that the appointments have not been made nor was there evidence that an attempt to make the appointment was made. The DON confirmed on 1/22/19 at 12:27 PM that the appointment had not been made prior to this surveyor's review but she did share that appointments were made as a result.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide care in the highest practicable manner for Residents (#23 and # 116). This was evident for 2 of 54 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to thoroughly evaluate and determine if the correct blood test was ordered for Resident #23. Medical record review for Resident #23 revealed on 10/10/18 the facility staff obtained a potassium level with the results of 3.3 (normal range 3.5-5.5). Potassium is one of the most important minerals in the body. It helps regulate fluid balance, muscle contractions and nerve signals. At that time the physician was notified and ordered: potassium chloride 20 meq x 1 as a supplement to increase the potassium level. Further record review revealed the physician ordered laboratory blood work for 10/11/18. The facility staff took the laboratory blood test as BNP (Brain natriuretic peptide -BNP test is a blood test that measures levels of a protein called BPN that is made by your heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure residents were being turned and repositioned as ordered. This was true for 1 out of 4 residents selected to be reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings are: A review of Resident #28's clinical record revealed the primary physician wrote an order for the resident to not remain on his/her back. This surveyor observed on 1/16/19 at 11:16 AM a sign on the resident's wall behind the bed saying that the resident should stay on his/her back. The resident was observed on 1/18/19 at 9:37 AM, 11:07 AM, and 1:30 PM to be on his/her back. The Director of Nursing was interviewed on 1/22/19 at 11:02 AM. The observations were shared with her and she acknowledged what was said.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain weights as ordered on Resident #109. This was evident for 1 of 54 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #109 revealed on 12/30/18 (a Sunday) the physician ordered: weigh every week on day shift on Wednesday for 4 weeks then monthly. Further record review revealed the facility staff failed to weigh the resident on 1/2/19 (Wednesday). On 1/3/19 at 4:25 PM, the physician ordered: weigh 1/4/19; however, the facility staff failed to obtain the weight as ordered by the physician. On 1/7/19, the dietician in collaboration with the physician: ordered weigh 1/8/19; however, the facility staff failed to obtain the weight as ordered. (Of note, the facility staff obtained weight on 1/9/19). As noted, the documented weights obtained by the facility staff: 12/8/18: 161.8 (Saturday), 12/12/18: 157.6 (Wednesday)' 12/21/18: 153.5 (Friday) a 5.13. % noted weight loss 1/4/19: order to obtain weight, 1/8/19: order to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-22 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the physician failed to determine the significance and need of an ordered laboratory blood test for Resident #116. This was evident for 1 of 54 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident # 116 revealed on 12/8/18 the physician ordered: Eliquis 5 milligrams by mouth 2 times a day for A fib. Atrial fibrillation (A Fib) is the most common type of irregular heartbeat. The abnormal firing of electrical impulses causes the atria (the top chambers in the heart) to quiver (or fibrillate). It means the heart's normal rhythm is out of whack. Because the blood isn't moving well, blood can also pool inside the heart and form clots. Eliquis belongs to the group of medications called anticoagulants. Anticoagulants prevent harmful blood clots from forming in the blood vessels. They do this by reducing the ability of the blood to clot. Eliquis may also be used to prevent stroke or blood clots in people with atrial fibrillation. Further record review revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-22 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of employee files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide at least 12 hours of nursing aides' in-services within a year. This was evident for 3 of 5 randomly selected staff members reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Review of the facility assessment on 01/18/19 revealed the facility does care for residents that suffer from cognitive, behavior, and substance abuse issues. 1) Review of Employee #13's employee and education records on 01/22/19 revealed Employee #13's only received 4 hours of nursing aides' in-services in 2018. It was also noted that Employee #13 did not receive any additional dementia training in 2018. 2) Review of Employee #14's employee and education records on 01/22/10 revealed Employee #14's only received 4 hours of nursing aides' in-services in 2018. It was also noted that Employee #14 did not receive any additional dementia training in 2018. 3) Review of Employee #15's employee and education records on 01/22/19 revealed that Employee #15 did not receive any hours of nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record, facility policies, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure pharmacists' review recommendations were addressed and acted on by the physicians in a timely manner. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #342) of 3 residents reviewed for drug regimen review during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: On January 22, 2019 at 10:52 AM a medical record review was conducted for Resident #342. The resident was admitted in December 2018 with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and chronic pain. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of January 2019 revealed that the resident had orders for 2 types of laxatives, (Miralax and Glycolax). In addition, surveyor noted that the resident received 2 types of breathing medications, (Breo and Fluticasone). A review of the January 15, 2019 pharmacist review consultation report for Resident #342 confirmed the duplicate therapies and recommended that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record, facility policies, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure residents are free from unnecessary drugs. This was evident for 1 (Resident #342) of 3 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications during the survey. Findings include; A review of the pharmacist review consultation report dated January 15, 2019 for Resident #342 was conducted on 01/22/19 at 11:19 PM. The report revealed that that pharmacist noted duplicate therapies for breathing medications; Breo and Fluticasone, and 2 types of laxatives; Miralax and Glycolax. Further review of the report revealed the pharmacist recommended that the resident's physician evaluate if one of the breathing medications and the Miralax order should be discontinued. However, review of the resident's medical record revealed that there was no order to discontinue the laxative. Further record review failed to indicate a reason from the resident's physician to not discontinue the Miralax as recommended. A review of the facility's Pharmacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain a medication error rate less than 5%. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents observed for medication pass and 2 of 25 opportunities for error. The findings include: Error #1: The facility staff failed to administer medications to Resident #56. Medical record review for Resident #56 revealed on 1/19/18 the physician ordered: Duloxetine HCL delayed release 60 milligrams by mouth every day for depression. Duloxetine is used to treat depression and anxiety. Surveyor observation of medication pass on 1/17/19 at 8:10 AM revealed facility staff #16 failed to administer the medication to Resident #56. Error #2: The facility staff failed to administer medications to Resident #56. Medical record review for Resident #56 revealed on 4/10/18 the physician ordered: Vitamin D 3, 2000 international units by mouth, every day as a supplement. Vitamin D is essential for strong bones, because it helps the body use calcium from the diet. Vitamin D 3 can be taken as a supplement to improve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure medications were kept in a locked and secured location (2nd floor). This was evident for 1 out of the 2 facility nursing stations. The findings include: It was observed on 1-18-19 at 9:30 AM that the medications for a discharged resident (#344) were left unsecured and unattended on the desk top of the 2nd floor nursing station. The following medications were left unattended ascorbic acid, risperdene, sertraline, melatonin, aspirin, iron, famotidine, eye drops timolol, dorzolamide, igtanoprost, and 2 bottles of liquid antacid. From 9:30 AM to 9:45 AM no facility staff were in the nursing station. Staff #3 returned at 9:45 AM and stated the practice is for the medicine aides to pull discharged resident's medication from their cart and place it at the nursing station until the registered nurse can inventory and remove them. On 1-18-19 at 9:45 AM Staff #3 confirmed the medications were left unattended and unsecured. On 1-18-19 at 10:00 AM the Administrator was notified of the medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain the medical record for a residents (#342 and #13) in the most complete and accurate form. This was evident for 2 of 54 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: 1. A medical record is the official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. On 1-22-19 at 10:00 AM a review of Resident #342's medical record revealed that the physician had completed an initial History and Physical (H&P) on 1-2-19 and a followup visit on 1-8-19. The chart had a signed form from the physician that the work was dictated however the H&P and followup note were not on the medical record. Interview with Staff #9 on 1-22-19 at 10:00 AM confirmed the physician had dictated the visits but had not faxed to the facility to be included in the medical record.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and resident and staff interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to assess a Resident's (#343) ability to perform their own wound care. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for infections. The findings include: During initial resident interview on 1-16-19 at 12:50 PM Resident #343 stated the staff have given him/her the supplies to complete the daily ordered care to the open areas on the skin where the external orthopeadic devices were attached to his/her lower extremities. Resident #343 had continued to complete the daily wound care since admission. On 1-18-19 at 1:30 PM Unit Manager #4 confirmed Resident #343 does his/her own wound care. Unit Manager #4 confirmed the facility nurses had signed on the treatment record that they completed the daily ordered wound care when in fact the resident had accomplished the wound care themselves. Unit Manager #4 also confirmed the facility had not assessed Resident #343's knowledge and ability to complete the ordered wound treatment unsupervised.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-09-16 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to post all of the required staffing information on a daily basis and was observed during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On 9/08/25, at 7:30 AM, the survey team entered the facility for the annual survey. The team toured the facility and their observations of staffing post revealed that the required staffing information was not posted in a public area.During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/15/25, at 8:15 AM, she stated that the facility has assignments for each unit. However, they do not post the staffing information, including the facility name, date, resident census, and the total number and actual hours worked by nursing staff, in a public area. The surveyor shared this concern, and the DON validated it.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$129,919 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $60,132 — penalty dated 2025-02-26
- $69,787 — penalty dated 2023-08-22
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 84 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 84; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC MD OPCOS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/01/2021 |
| PC WTA OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2021 |
| SMS 2021 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2021 |
| SILVERBERG, NISANEL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/01/2021 |
| STEIN, SHALOM | Individual | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215135. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.