No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Complete Care at Care Age

1755 N. Barker Rd., Brookfield, WI 53045 · For profit - Corporation · 110 certified beds · (262) 821-3939 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Jan 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$80,375 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $80,375 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-25)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1675 N Barker Rd · (414) 755-4898 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
19333 W North Ave # 390 · (262) 780-4430 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
20222 Union St · (262) 439-8930 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Wray Park0.5 mi
1430 Jaclyn Dr · (262) 796-3781 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.2%16.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.4%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.6%2.7%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms27.9%5.7%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.6%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.1%18.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.0%16.9%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.4%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control33.1%24.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.8%15.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.6%82.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.7%23.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.6%15.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.511.661.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.592.291.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 223 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.2%CMS range 40.5–53.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.4–12.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.6–9.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.701.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
1.04
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.67
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
69.0%
Total nursing turnover
52.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 71.1 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.33 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.45 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-25)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-20)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident receives the necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice (N6, Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act) after experiencing a change of condition for 1 of 11 residents reviewed (R20). R20 had an unintended sudden change of plane while being transferred by a sit to stand lift by a lone Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). While in the lift sling, the lift's battery died, and resident ended up in a squatting position with her buttocks touching the foot pads of the lift. This sudden change of plane resulted in a hip fracture. Staff did not follow R20's plan of care which included using 2 staff for transfers with a sit to stand lift, and staff moved resident twice without a Registered Nurse (RN) assessment after the change of plane. The facility failed to report R20 having a change of plane to the oncoming shift, failed to give details regarding R20's incident to R20's provider delaying medical treatment, failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Example 2 R35 was admitted to the facility 4/24/23 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, the following: Dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), diabetes mellitus type 2 (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar), abnormal gait (walking different than normal), chronic kidney disease (disease of the kidneys that will eventually lead to kidney failure), and hypertension (high blood pressure). On 4/24/23, the facility's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) documents the following: Monitor feet to ensure skin is intact and free from s/sx (signs/symptoms) of developing skin alterations. Notify MD (Medical Doctor) with any change in skin integrity. Every evening shift for prevention of skin impairment. R35's Braden's are as follows: 4/24/24: 19 (Not At Risk) 7/24/24: 20 (Not at Risk) 10/25/24: 18 (Mild Risk) 11/8/24: 15 (Mild Risk) 1/21/25: 14 (Moderate Risk) 2/13/25: 11 (High Risk) 5/3/25: 16 (Mild Risk) On 7/5/24, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents in 1 of 2 residents (R20) reviewed for falls resulting in actual harm, 1 of 1 resident (R31) reviewed for motorized wheelchair charging, and 2 of 4 units reviewed for lithium battery charging. R20 is being cited at Actual Harm/Isolated. R31 and 2 of 4 units is being cited at Potential for Harm/Isolated. R20 was care planned to be a two person assist with a sit to stand transfer. CNA L transferred R20 alone when the lift lost battery power. R20 ended up sitting on the ground, had a sudden drop from the lift, and a change of plane/fall. CNA L assisted R20 off the floor and did not report R20 ended up sitting on the ground, had a sudden drop from a lift, and a change of plane/fall immediately to the floor nurse or to the oncoming shift. CNA L reported that R20 was on the ground to CNA M. CNA M did not report R20 had a fall to the floor nurse. R20 was found to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility did not always ensure that 3 out of 4 residents ( R37, R2, R360) reviewed for pressure ulcers received the necessary care and treatment to promote healing of existing pressure ulcers and to avoid the development of new pressure ulcers. R37 developed a Stage #3 pressure ulcer to his middle finger of the right hand. R37's range of motion to the right hand had deteriorated and a contracture developed. R37 was not provided with pressure relief for the contracture to the right hand and developed the stage #3 pressure ulcer. R2 had a history of resolved pressure ulcers to the right ankle and left buttocks. On [DATE] R2 developed a new pressure ulcer to the right buttocks (stage 2) and an order was given to obtain an alternating air mattress to provide additional pressure relief. The facility acknowledged that R2 should have had this type of mattress on his bed prior to the development of the new pressure ulcer to the right buttock and also that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-01-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility did not ensure a Resident with limited range of motion received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 (R37) of 1 Residents reviewed for limited range of motion. On 5/25/22, R37 was transferred from the hospital to the facility. R37 had been hospitalized following a fall which resulted in a right hip fracture and right humerus fracture. There was no surgical repair of the right humerus and R37 was advised to keep the right arm in a sling. R37 was admitted to the facility with the supportive services of hospice care. The facility did not document the interventions to address R37's limited arm Range of Motion (ROM), or identity interventions to prevent further decline in the right arm ROM until after R37's right hand became contracted. Findings include: The Facility policy, entitled Prevention of Decline in Range of Motion, dated 10/1/22 documents Residents who enter the facility without limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety potentially affecting 45 of 67 residents who eat their meals in their room. Observations were made of staff delivering meal trays to residents in their room with uncovered dessert items and beverages.Findings include:The facility policy and procedure that is undated and titled Dining: Maintain Nutritive Values documents: 4. Food Service . b. Prepared food will be transported to other areas in covered containers.On 12/2/2025 at 12:15 PM, Surveyor was in R1's room when staff brought in R1's lunch tray. The tray had a bowl with chocolate cake that had not been covered and coffee that did not have a lid on. Staff had prepared R1's meal tray at the nurses' station down the hallway and carried the uncovered items through the hall to present to R1.On 12/3/2025 at 8:02 AM, Surveyor observed the breakfast service on the rehab (rehabilitation) unit. Trays were brought to the unit by the kitchen staff in an insulated cart. Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored, and distributed. This has the potential to affect all 57 residents who reside in the facility. The facility did not have a system in place for manually monitoring the internal concentration of the chemical dishwasher. Surveyor observed staff prepping food and in food preparation areas without hair restraints. Surveyor observed food in circulation to be opened and undated or pass the expiration date. Evidenced by: Example 1 Facility's policy, titled Recording Dish Machine Temperatures, undated, includes: Dishwashing staff will monitor and record dishwasher machine temperatures to assure proper sanitizing of dishes. The food service manager will train dishwashing staff to monitor dish machine temperatures throughout the dishwashing process. Staff will be trained to record dish machine temperatures for the wash and rinse cycles at each meal. The food service manager will spot check this log to assure temperatures are appropriate and staff is actually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident receives food and drink that is palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature. This has the potential to affect 4 of 4 sampled residents (R56, R23, R37, R29) reviewed for food palatability and 4 of 4 supplemental residents (R2, R8, R14, and R5). R56, R23, R37, R29, R2, R8, R14, and R5 voiced concerns with their food not being palatable. Surveyors conducted 2 test trays and both test trays were not palatable. Evidenced by: Facility policy, titled Record Food Temperatures, implemented 5/28/25, includes: . Hot foods will be held at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or greater . Potentially hazardous cold food temperatures will be kept at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Example 1 R29 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/9/25, indicates his cognition is moderately impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15. It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility has not established an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 19 sampled residents (R49, R23, and R41) and 1 of 1 supplemental residents (R19) observed for hand hygiene. Staff did not perform proper hand hygiene per standards of practice during wound care on R49 and R23. A nurse had a breach in infection control during medication adminstration observation for R19 when a nurse did not perform hand hygiene following a blood glucose test. A nurse had a breach in infection control during wound care for R41. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Hand Hygiene, dated 5/28/25, states, in part: . Policy: All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. This applies to all staff working in all locations within the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents are clinically appropriate to self-administer medications for 2 of 2 sampled residents (R36, 31) and 1 of 1 supplemental resident's (R24) reviewed for self- administration of medications. R36 was observed to have a cup of medications left on his bedside table for him to take independently. R36 does not have an assessment for self-administration of medications indicating that he is safe to administer medications independently. R31 had containers of medication at bedside and had scheduled medications left on her bedside table for longer than 1 hour. R31's self-administration assessment only allows Lactaid at bedside and requires nurses to follow up with R31 after 1 hour. R24 had an inhaler at his bedside. R24 does not have an assessment for self-administration of medications indicating that he is safe to administer medications independently. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Resident Self- Administration of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan included a sleep assessment and sleep tracking for 3 of 5 residents (R6, R18, and R43) reviewed for unnecessary medications. R6 is prescribed melatonin and does not have a sleep assessment or sleep tracking. R18 is prescribed melatonin and does not have a sleep assessment or sleep tracking. R43 is prescribed melatonin and does not have a sleep assessment or sleep tracking. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Use of Psychotropic Medication(s), dated 5/28/25, includes: Adequate indications for use refers to the identified, documented clinical rationale for administering a medication that is based upon an assessment of the resident's condition and therapeutic goals and after any other treatments have been deemed clinically contraindicated. 5. The indications for initiating, maintaining, or discontinuing medications(s), [sic] as well as the use of non-pharmacological approaches, will be determined by evaluating the resident's physical, behavioral, mental, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Example 2 R28 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection (2/25/25) , urine retention, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. On 6/10/25 at 10:56 AM Surveyor observed R28 being pushed in his wheelchair down the hallway. Surveyor heard something rubbing as R28 passed. Surveyor observed R28's catheter bag dragging on the floor. On 6/10/25 at 10:59 AM LPN Y (Licensed Practical Nurse) indicated R28's catheter bag should not be in contact with the floor. LPN Y stated, I will fix this. On 6/10/25 12:03 PM NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) indicated residents' catheters should not be touching the floor. On 6/10/25 at 1:53 PM DON B (Director of Nursing) indicated R28's catheter should not be in contact with floor. On 6/11/25 at 1:26 PM during wound care observation, Surveyor observed R28's catheter bag to be resting in contact with the floor. On 6/11/25 at 1:27 PM LPN G indicated R28's catheter bag should not be in direct contact with the facility's floor. Based on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents are free of any significant medication errors for 2 of 2 residents (R31 and R41) reviewed for medications. The facility did not ensure R31 took her evening medications as prescribed. R41 did not receive one dose of the intravenous (IV) antibiotic ordered for wound infection. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Medication Errors, dated 5/28/25, includes: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by ensuring residents receive care and services safely in an environment free of significant medication errors. Medication error means the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with the prescriber's order; manufacturer's specifications (not recommendations) regarding the preparation and administration of the medication or biological; or accepted professional standards and principles which apply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide food that accommodates resident preferences; appealing options of similar nutritive value to residents who choose not to eat food that is initially served or who request a different meal choice for 3 of 17 sampled resident's (R23, R31, & R37). R23 was being served foods that were listed on his meal ticket as disliked food. R23's food preferences were not being honored. R31 was being served gravy that was listed on her meal ticket as disliked food. R31's food preferences were not being honored. R37's received foods that are on the R37 has indicated she should not have. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Resident Food Preferences, dated 5/28/25, states, in part: . Individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team. Modifications to diet will only be ordered with the resident's or representative's consent. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Upon the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 5 (R3, R5, R6, R7 and R8) of 7 residents reviewed for medications. *R3, R5, R6, R7 and R8 had MD orders for narcotic pain medication. Facility staff did not consistently document the administration time of the pain medication directly after administering the pain medication as outlined in the facility policy. The late documentation could result in duplication of pain medication administration. *R5 had duplicate Medical Doctor (MD) orders for Oxycodone (a narcotic pain medication). Facility staff were using both MD orders for documenting the administration of Oxycodone. Findings include: The Wisconsin State Regulation entitled, DHS 132.60(5)(d)2. documents, in part: . Responsibility for administration. Policies and procedures designed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 16 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not report 1 (R2) of 2 incidents to the State Survey Agency and/or Nursing Home Administrator during the required timeframe. On 12/7/24 NHA (Nursing Home Administrator) was informed of a skin tear on R2's left wrist which CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-G reported to LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-E as occurring when taking off R2's sweat shirt. NHA-A was not informed on 12/7/24 of R2's allegation the skin tear occurred when CNA-G grabbed her arm. The allegation of CNA-G grabbing R2's arm was reported to DON (Director of Nursing)-B on 12/7/24 but DON-B did not report this to the State agency. The allegation of physical abuse was not reported to NHA-A or the State agency until 12/9/24. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation and last reviewed/revised 9/22/23 under policy documents: It is the policy of [name of facility] to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R2) of 4 residents care plans were revised. R2's care plan was not revised after an allegation on 12/7/24 of a CNA grabbing R2's wrist causing a skin tear. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change and implemented 10/21/24 under Policy documents The purpose of this procedure is to provide a consistent process for reviewing and revising the care plan for those residents experiencing a status change. Under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines documents 1. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed, and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change. R2's diagnoses includes osteoarthritis, anxiety disorder, hypertension, essential tremor, and depressive disorder. The ADL (Activities Daily Living) Functional Potential/Rehabilitation and/or Limited Mobility care plan initiated 9/29/23 documents the following interventions: *Bathing/Showering: Provide sponge bath when a full…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation is in progress. This had the potential to effect 19 of 19 residents on the 400 hallway. On 4/2/24 while providing cares, R1 accused Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-D of slapping her. CNA-D reported this to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C. LPN-C did not immediately report the allegation of abuse to administration resulting in CNA-D not being removed from the resident care area immediately pending investigation and was allowed to work the rest of the shift. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy with a revised date of 09/22/2023. Documented was: Policy: It is the policy of [this facility] to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures. The staff did not report the incident to the administration immediately after the incident and did not contact law enforcement to report this reasonable suspicion of a crime for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. On 4/2/24 while providing cares, R1 accused Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-D of slapping her. CNA-D reported this to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C. LPN-C did not immediately report the allegation of abuse to administration. Law enforcement was not called to report this reasonable suspicion of a crime. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy with a revised date of 09/22/2023. Documented was: Policy: It is the policy of [this facility] to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-20 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility did not ensure grievances and recommendations discussed during resident group meetings (Resident Council) were acted upon promptly and with feedback provided by the Facility. R2, R4, R20, and R51, expressed concern the Facility did not resolve grievances or provide feedback of steps taken to resolve grievances discussed at Resident Council Meetings. The grievance documents generated from Resident Council Meetings do not identify how the grievances were investigated, if interviews with staff/residents were completed, or the outcome of the investigation. Resident Council Minutes did not include actions taken regarding the concerns voiced by residents. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Resident Council Meetings policy and procedure implemented 2/20/23 and notes the following: . Policy: This facility supports the rights of Residents to organize and participate in Resident groups, including a Resident Council. This policy provides guidance to promoting structure, order, and productivity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the Facility did not thoroughly investigate a possible misappropriation of property for Residents receiving liquid morphine. This has the potential to affect 7 hospice residents who received liquid morphine on the 300 & 400 units in October 2023. Findings include: The Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy last reviewed/revised 9/22/23 documents alleged violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or others but has not yet been investigated and, if verified, could be indication of noncompliance with the Federal requirements related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property. Section V. Investigation of alleged abuse, neglect and exploitation documents A. An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation or reports of abuse, neglect, or exploitation occur. B. Written procedures for investigation include: 1. Identifying staff responsible for the investigation; 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not report 2 of 2 incidents to the State Survey Agency and/or Nursing Home Administrator. * A possible diversion of liquid morphine was not reported to the Nursing Home Administrator and State Agency. * R25's ankle fracture was not reported to the State Agency as an injury of unknown origin. Findings include: The Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy last reviewed/revised 9/22/23 documents alleged violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or others but has not yet been investigated and, if verified, could be indication of noncompliance with the Federal requirements related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property. Under VII Reporting/Response documents: A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not ensure 1 (R2) of 1 Resident's reviewed for communication received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing ability. R2 had an audiology consult on 2/19/24 for a lost hearing aid. Under recommendations for attending M.D. (medical doctor)/Nursing Staff documents Medical consult to obtain medical clearance for comprehensive evaluation for hearing aids. As of 3/20/24 medical clearance was not obtained and R2 does not have a right hearing aid. Findings include: The Hearing and Vision Services Policy dated 8/23 under policy documents It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all residents have access to hearing and vision services and receive adaptive equipment as indicated. R2's diagnosis includes dementia. R2's care plan documents the potential for alteration in communication r/t (related to) hearing loss care plan initiated 7/6/23 & revised 10/4/23 documents the following interventions: * Ask yes/no questions. Initiated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility did not ensure Residents with a pressure injury received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of pressure injuries and to promote healing for 1 (R2) of 5 Residents reviewed for pressure injuries. R2 has a stage 2 right buttock pressure injury with an intervention for an air cushion on R2's wheelchair. Observations were made on 3/18/24 & 3/19/24 of the air cushion not on. Facility staff were not aware the air cushion was off until brought to their attention by the Surveyor. Findings include: The Pressure Injury Prevention and Management policy implemented 12/1/23 under policy explanation and compliance guidelines includes documentation of: 4. Interventions for Prevention and Promote Healing. a. After completing a thorough assessment/evaluation, the interdisciplinary team shall develop a relevant care plan that includes measurable goals for prevention and management of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not ensure 1 (R30) of 4 Residents reviewed for falls received the supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. On 11/16/23 R30 fell out of bed during incontinence cares as CNA-I rolled R30 away from her and not towards her. Findings include: R30's diagnoses includes hypertension, spinal stenosis cervical region, and anxiety disorder. The Morse fall scale dated 11/6/23 has a score of 55 which indicates R30 is at high risk for falling. The quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an assessment reference date of 11/11/23 has a BIMS (brief interview mental status) score of 15 which indicates cognitively intact. R30 is assessed as having upper extremity impairment on both sides for functional limitation in range of motion. R30 is assessed as being dependent for toileting hygiene, upper & lower body dressing, rolling left to right, and chair/bed to chair transfer. R30 is always incontinent of urine & bowel. R30 has fallen since prior assessment with one fall with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure potential side effects of psychotropic medications were monitored and consents were provided for 1 (R25) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. *R25 received an order for Seroquel 25 mg (milligrams) on 12/18/2023. R25's activated Power of Attorney (POA) did not sign the medication consent for use of the Seroquel until 3/19/2024 after Surveyor inquired about the consent and no monitoring was documented for potential adverse side effects of the Seroquel until 3/19/2024. Findings include: R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of a fractured patella, coronary artery disease, muscular dystrophy, anxiety, depression, and dementia. R25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R25 had moderate cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 and was assessed as being dependent on staff for toileting with moderate to substantial assist with other activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-05 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA-G and CNA-H) of 5 reviewed for abuse training and 5 (CNA-D, CNA-E, CNA-F, CNA-G, and CNA-H) of 5 reviewed for dementia training who had been employed for over a year or providing direct care received dementia management & resident abuse prevention training. This has the potential to affect all 62 residents residing at the facility as staff work throughout the facility. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed the Facility Assessment with a revision date of 10/14/2022 to identify resources the facility needs to care for their residents. Documented under Staff Training/Education and Competencies was: .Abuse, neglect, and exploitation - training that at a minimum educates staff on (1) Activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property; (2) Procedures for reporting incidents, of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or the misappropriation of resident property; and (3) Care/management for persons with dementia and resident abuse prevention. Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility did not utilize proper infection control techniques to prevent and control the spread of infections such as COVID-19. The facility did not ensure all necessary staff were fit tested for N95's. The facility's last recording of staff having a fit test for N95's was 5/6/21 where 18 of the 175 staff members were noted to be fit tested. Findings include: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronovirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, updated 9/23/2022, states in part, 2. Recommended infection prevention and control (IPC) practices when caring for a patient with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection: Personal Protective Equipment: - HCP who enter the room of a patient with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection should adhere to Standard Precautions and use a NIOSH-approved particulate respirator with N95 filters or higher, gown, gloves, and eye protection (i.e. goggles, or a face shield that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview the facility did not provide care and services related to Restorative Nursing Services for dependent residents for 1 (R26) of 1 resident reviewed for therapy services. * R26 was discharged from Physical Therapy (PT) on 11/9/22. On 11/18/22 an order was written to begin Restorative Nursing Rehabilitation and was not completed per order and plan of care. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed facility's Restorative Nursing Services policy with a revision date of July 2017. Documented was: Policy Statement Residents will receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Restorative nursing care consists of nursing interventions that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitative services (e.g., physical, occupational or speech therapies). 2. Residents may be started on a restorative nursing program upon admission, during the course of stay or when discharged from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R29) of 5 resident reviewed for weight loss received the necessary services to assist with nutritional maintenance. R29 experienced a 9.4 pound weight loss (5.9%) from 11/23/22- 12/14/22 without having a comprehensive assessment or further interventions put into place to help R29 not to loose any further weight. This is evidenced by: Policy review: Weighing and Measuring the Resident revised March 2011. Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to determine the resident's weight and height, to provide a baseline and an ongoing record of the resident's body weight as an indicator of the nutritional status and medical condition of the resident, and to provide a baseline height in order to determine the ideal weight of the resident. Reporting: 1. Report significant weight loss/ weight gain to the nurse supervisor. 2. The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss/ gain will be based on the following criteria (where percentage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R13) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications had adequate behavior monitoring while receiving psychotropic medications. * R13 received psychotropic medications without adequate behavior monitoring. Findings include: R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R13 has diagnoses of Vascular Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety disorder. On 12/25/202, the physician ordered Remeron 7.5 (antidepressant) mg daily. R13 receives psychotropic medications including scheduled Remeron (antidepressant) on a daily basis. On 1/3/23 at 10:15 AM. Surveyor reviewed R13's medical record. Surveyor asked DON (Director of Nursing) -B where behavior monitoring would be located in the medical record. DON-B told Surveyor this information would be documented by nursing staff in the MAR (Medication Administration Record). Surveyor asked DON-B what the expectation would be for behavior monitoring for a resident receiving psychotropic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$80,375 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $26,125 — penalty dated 2025-06-25
  • $54,250 — penalty dated 2025-06-25
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-24 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.1-2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 84 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Complete Care At Chestnut Hill LLCPassaic, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care At HagerstownHagerstown, MD 1 of 5Complete Care At Harston Hall LLCFlourtown, PA 1 of 5Complete Care At Kimberly Hall NorthWindsor, CT 1 of 5Complete Care At Laplata LLCLaplata, MD 1 of 5Complete Care At Milford Manor LLCWest Milford, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care At Wayne Hills Rehab & Resp CenterWayne, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care at KensingtonWaukesha, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at Maple Grove LLCMadison, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at Margate ParkChicago, IL 1 of 5Complete Care at the BoulevardChicago, IL 2 of 5Complete Care At Brakeley ParkPhillipsburg, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Fox HillVernon, CT 2 of 5Complete Care At Harborage LLCNorth Bergen, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Harrington CourtColchester, CT 2 of 5Complete Care At HyattsvilleHyattsville, MD 2 of 5Complete Care At Inglemoor, LLCEnglewood, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Monmouth, LLCLong Branch, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Ocean Grove LLCOcean Grove, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Prospect Heights LLCHackensack, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Regent LLCHackensack, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Christian Home LLCWaupun, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Grande PrairiePleasant Prairie, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Heritage LLCDundalk, MD 2 of 5Complete Care at Linwood, LLCLinwood, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Nazareth LLCStoughton, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Voorhees, LLCVoorhees, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Wall LLCWall, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Fair Lawn EdgePaterson, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Holiday CityToms River, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Lehigh LLCMacungie, PA 3 of 5Complete Care At Oak Ridge LLCCharleston, WV 3 of 5Complete Care At Orange ParkEast Orange, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Phillipsburg, LLCPhillipsburg, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Severna Park LLCSeverna Park, MD 3 of 5Complete Care At Shrewsbury LLCShrewsbury, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Silver Lake LLCDover, DE 3 of 5Complete Care At SpringbrookSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Complete Care at Brick LLCBrick, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care at Corsica Hills LLCCentreville, MD

Showing 40 of 84; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PC CARE AGE OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/28/2025
PC CARE AGE TOPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2025
PEACE CAPITAL HOLDINGS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2025
SMS 2021 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2025
DES CAPITAL LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/28/2025
JRK INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/28/2025
KLUGMAN, JACOBIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/28/2025
STEIN, SHALOMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 05/28/2025
STERNBUCH, DANIELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/28/2025
HELLMAN, YOSEFIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/28/2025
CULP, KARENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/28/2025
GREEN, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/28/2025
RAMNANAN, KESHNIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/28/2025
SCHAEFER-TROWER, TOMINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/28/2025
CARE AGE OF BROOKFIELD PROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/29/2025
PC CARE AGE PROPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/28/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$599K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 34%Medicare 13%Other / private 53%

This home reported $599K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$398per resident / day
operating cost
$12,111per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$411per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525519. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next