Complete Care At Fair Lawn Edge

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 174.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.14 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #NJ 165064 Complaint #NJ 166666 Based on interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to 1.) provide adequate supervision for a cognitively impaired, exit seeking resident and ensure exit doors were securely locked which resulted in Resident # 353 eloping from the facility on 06/15/2023 and 2.) follow facility elopement policy which resulted in Resident # 355 eloping from the facility on 08/17/2023. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents (Resident # 353 and Resident # 355) reviewed for elopement. The facility failed to monitor and supervise a cognitively impaired, exit seeking resident from being able to exit the facility through an unsecured exit door. This posed a serious and immediate risk to the health, safety, and well-being of Resident #353. During an annual Recertification survey on 04/19/24, the survey team identified an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) running from 06/15/23 at 8:53 PM, when the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # 2693362 Based on observation, interviews and review of other pertinent facility documents on 12/22/2025,12/23/2025 and 12/29/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a procedure to safely acquire and receive physician ordered Methadone, (a controlled Substance) from a third party clinic; by assigning an unlicensed staff a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1) to travel to an outside third party clinic to pick up Methadone (a controlled substance) for Residents #6,#7 and #8. CNA #1 would take the locked box with the key which contained the Methadone and drive to the facility in her personal car. An interview with the third-party's clinic staff and with facility's CNA #1 confirmed that CNA #1 picked up Methadone from the outside clinic and had access to the key for the box with the Methadone. Review of document from the third-party clinic which was provided to the Department of Health (DOH) by the facility, stated that CNA #1 performed this function of picking up the Methadone for residents on 11/19/2025 until 12/15/2025. During an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure the facility was maintained in a safe, clean, and homelike environment. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 units (3rd and 4th floors) and 2 of 2 shower rooms.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 8/13/25 at 9:55 AM, the surveyor with the Housekeeping Director (HD) toured the 3rd floor and observed the following inside the shower room:-Upon entry, toward the right side of the shower room in the 1st cubicle, there was a shower chair with ripped chair cover, and across the 1st cubicle was a plastic tray. The 1st cubicle wall tiles and moldings with yellowish stain. The HD informed the surveyor that the plastic tray was part of a wheelchair that should have not on the floor. The HD confirmed that the tiles should have been cleaned.-The 2nd cubicle floor safety strips were peeling off. The HD stated that the safety strips were safety measures to prevent resident from falling while in shower and should have been fixed. Both the surveyor and the HD…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the interview and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to issue the Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC, which is an official document issued by Medicare-certified healthcare providers and serves as a formal notice informing beneficiaries about the termination or denial of coverage for specific health care services) or Form CMS - 10123, required notice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #182) reviewed for beneficiary notification. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following On 8/11/25 at 10:51 AM, the surveyor reviewed the NOMNC or Form CMS -10123 review completed by the facility for Resident #182 as follows: A review of the Progress Notes (PN) dated 4/9/25 at 4:19 PM stated that the resident was transferred to another health care facility. A review of the electronic Medical Records (eMR) revealed that there was no documented evidence that the NOMNC was done, nor the reason why it was not done. A review of the physician certification and re-certification form with a handwritten name of Resident #182 and with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently follow standards of clinical practice by following a physician's order for the administration of medications and clarifying a physician's order for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #19 and #21). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as casefinding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident receive treatment and care as specified by hospital discharge orders, in accordance with professional standards of practice and facility policies and procedures for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #169) reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist.Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure, a.) proper handling and storage of linen and laundry and b.) proper disposal of garbage to prevent the potential spread of infection in accordance with standards of clinical practice, and the facility's policy. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 laundry area, 1 of 3 linen rooms, and 1 of 2 shower rooms observed during infection control tour.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 8/13/25 at 9:38 AM, the surveyor toured the laundry area in the presence of the Laundry Staff (LS). Both the surveyor and the LS observed the following:-Upon entry to the laundry area, there was an electric fan on the floor blowing air toward the clean hung personal clothes of the residents. The electric fan with heavy accumulation of grayish substances and the personal clothes of the residents were uncovered. The LS confirmed that it was accumulation of dust that was in the electric fan and should have been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to acceptable standards of nursing practice. This deficient practice was identified in 4 of 7 residents who had medication improperly prepared for administration, 1. Resident #86, #199, #73, #200, 2. facility failed to ensure a resident's medication times were adjusted to accommodate their dialysis (a clinical purification of blood as a substitute for the normal function of the kidneys) schedule for 1 of 3 Residents reviewed for accurate dialysis scheduling of medication times, Resident #84, 3. failed to ensure that the oxygen rate was administered according to Physician's Order (PO), for 1 of 1 Residents reviewed for Oxygen use, Resident #2 4. facility failed to ensure recommendations made by the Registered Dietician was acted upon in a timely manner as per facility policy and in accordance with professional standards of clinical practice for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) maintain infection control practices to reduce the risk of infection during a pressure ulcer (PU) treatment; b.) to assess a resident for risk for pressure ulcer quarterly and c.) ensure a physician's order was administered as ordered consistently for preventative measures for skin for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for PU/injury. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/15/24 at 11:44 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #25 asleep in bed with resident's daughter at the bedside. The surveyor interviewed Resident #25's daughter who stated that the resident had a PU, and that the PU was getting better. Resident #25's daughter further stated that the staff turned and changed the resident. On 4/18/24 at 9:56 AM, the surveyor observed the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 perform Resident #25's PU treatment. The ADON and LPN #1 performed hand hygiene (HH) with an alcohol based…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  3. On 4/22/24 at 12:23 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #352's hybrid medical records. The resident was discharged from the facility on 1/31/24. The admission Record (AR) documented that Resident #352 had diagnoses that included but were not limited, Acute Respiratory Failure, Pneumonia, Type II Diabetes Mellitus and Bipolar Disorder. A review of the physician progress notes (PN), revealed there were no notes written by Physician #1 from November 2023 to January 2024. 2. On 4/18/24 at 9:45 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #142's hybrid medical record which revealed that the resident's physician only documented one visit which was dated 4/11/24. There was not a documented physician's visit for Resident #142's admission and subsequent monthly visit for February 2024 and March 2024. On 4/18/24 at 9:47 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Unit Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse (UM/LPN) of the second floor unit. The UM/LPN stated that Resident #142's physician visited residents a couple times a week but that she did not know how often the physician would write a note regarding the visit.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to properly store and accurately label medications found during the initial unit inspection. This deficient practice was observed for 1 of 3 facility units examined, as evidenced by the following: On 4/15/24 at 12:50 PM, the surveyor inspected the 2nd floor low medication cart. Within the low medication cart the surveyor observed an opened 10ml bottle of Acetylcysteine 20% that was not labeled. Further examination of the bottle of Acetylcysteine revealed that the bottle did not have any documentation of a date or time the bottle was opened. Inspection of the bottle of Acetylcysteine 20% indicated on the label, Store in refrigerator after opening. and Discard opened vial after 96 hours. The surveyor interviewed the 2nd floor UM/LPN#1 who stated that it might belong to Resident #146 who does have an order for Acetylcysteine. The UM/LPN#1 confirmed that the medication should not have been stored without a label, date/time opened. Review of the facility admission Sheet for Resident #146…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,036 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,036 — penalty dated 2024-04-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ