Complete Care At Laplata LLC
1 Magnolia Drive, Laplata, MD 20646 · For profit - Corporation · 142 certified beds · (301) 934-4001 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $21,764 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-09)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.3% | 20.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.0% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 48.2% | 22.8% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.3% | 22.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.0% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.5% | 5.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 31.6% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.2% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.1% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.6% | 80.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.1% | 21.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.3% | 9.8% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 228 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 55.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.1%CMS range 45.3–58.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.4%CMS range 10.9–18.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 49.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 4.6–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 142 beds and averages 132.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
63 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to identify and evaluate factors contributing to a resident's falls and ensure appropriate interventions were implemented to prevent future occurrences. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm to Resident #1. This was evident for 1 (#6) of 1 resident reviewed for accidents/hazards.The findings include:Care plan - is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Person-centered care: means to focus on the resident as the locus of control and support the resident in making their own choices and having control over their daily lives.MDS (Minimum Data Set) - is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status.On 1/2/26 the state agency (SA) received a complaint 2708089 regarding Resident #6 alleging that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from accidents and hazards. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #22) out of 1 Resident reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm cited as past noncompliance. The findings include: On 03/20/25, at 8:00AM, during a medical record review, it was found that Resident #22 sustained second degree burns on the right fourth and fifth digits, abdomen, and thigh from hot coffee on 02/23/25. As a result, the resident was admitted to the hospital for burn treatment. During an interview conducted on 03/20/25 at 8:05 AM, the Surveyors were unable to communicate with Resident #22 because he/she was non verbal. During an interview conducted on 03/20/25 at 8:12 AM, the Kitchen Manager stated that at the time of the incident coffee was served at 150 degrees Fahrenheit. He further stated that the appropriate serving temperature for hot beverages was 135 degrees Fahrenheit. During an interview conducted on 03/20/25 at 8:13 AM, the District…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility reported incident 3018652, medical record, and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to notify a resident's responsible party of the addition and discontinuation of treatment. This was evident for 1 (#6) of 8 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include:On 6/9/26 at 1:42 PM a review of facility reported incident 3018652 and Resident #6's medical record was conducted.A wanderguard bracelet is a discreet device worn by at-risk individuals that alerts staff when the resident approaches a monitored or restricted door. It prevents residents with memory impairment who exhibit wandering or exit seeking behaviors from exiting through the door into an unsafe environment.Review of a 2/21/26 at 1638 (4:38 PM) nurse's note documented that Resident #6 was an elopement risk per the night supervisor and a wanderguard bracelet was placed on the resident's right ankle.Further review of Resident #6's medical record failed to produce documentation that the responsible party was notified the wanderguard bracelet was applied.Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility reported incident 3018652, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 1 (#6) of 8 residents reviewed for complaints during a complaint survey.The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. A wanderguard bracelet is a discreet device worn by at-risk individuals that alerts staff when the resident approaches a monitored or restricted door. It prevents residents with memory impairment who exhibit wandering or exit seeking behaviors from exiting through the door into an unsafe environment.On 6/9/26 at 1:42 PM a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on investigation into a complaint, observations, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to reassess and continue an established intervention for contracture management following a resident's readmission from the hospital. This was evident for 1 (Resident #2) of 8 residents reviewed during the complaint survey.The findings include:Hemiplegia is a severe or complete loss of strength or paralysis on one side of the body. A contracture is the abnormal shortening of muscle tissue, rendering the muscle highly resistant to stretching which can lead to permanent disability. On 6/9/26, complaint #3003711 was reviewed related to care concerns involving Resident #2.On 6/9/26 at 10:07 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2 in bed. A right hand splint was not observed.On 6/9/26 at 3:37 PM, the surveyor again observed Resident #2 in bed. A right hand splint was not observed.On 6/10/26 at 8:05 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2 in bed. A right hand splint was not observed.On 6/10/26 at 8:25 AM, review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of meal selections by posting current menus for resident review prior to meal service. This was evident for 1 (Resident #8) of 8 residents reviewed during the complaint survey and had the potential to affect residents who relied on posted menus to make meal selections.The findings include:On 6/10/26 at approximately 11:30 AM, an interview with Resident #8 revealed current menus were not posted for at least one week and residents were not able to review meals in advance. Resident #8 stated s/he requested a salad for lunch because s/he did not know what meal was being served. Resident #8 stated that when lunch was served, s/he learned a different meal option was available and stated s/he would have selected that meal had they known it was being served.On 6/10/26 at 11:55 AM, the surveyor observed three menus posted outside the nurses' station on the 200 unit. The menus were dated 6/1/26, 6/2/26, and 6/3/26.On 6/10/26 at 12:15 PM, an interview with the Food Service Director (FSD)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of complaint 3014373, facility reported incident 3018652, medical record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 2 (#1, #6) of 8 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate.1)On 6/9/26 at 11:36 AM a review of complaint 3014373 was conducted along with Resident #1's medical record.Review of a 3/6/26 at 15:26 (3:26 PM) change in condition note documented, Fall. The note documented that no changes were observed. There was no further documentation of the fall. There was no documentation of how the resident fell, what precipitated the fall, where the fall occurred, the positioning of the resident after the fall, or if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Pharmacy Recommendations were implemented. This was found to be evident for 3 (Resident # 3, Resident #14 & #15) out of 6 Residents reviewed for Pharmacy Medication Regimen Review (MRR) during the recertification and complaint survey. The findings include: 1)The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a standardized assessment tool used in nursing homes to evaluate a resident's clinical condition, functional status, and care needs. Antipsychotic medications are drugs used to treat certain mental health conditions and behaviors, and because these medications can have significant side effects, facilities are expected to routinely evaluate their ongoing need. A Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) is the stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued. Psychotropic drug is defined in the regulations as any drug that affects brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that resident had a homelike environment to live in. This was evident for 2 of 2 nursing units in the facility. The findings include:A tour of on 1/7/26 at 9:46 AM of the C and D nursing unit revealed the following observations:1. A partially dissembled hand sanitizer dispenser laying on a personal protective equipment (PPE) cart outside room [ROOM NUMBER].2. There were wheelchairs (w/c), geriatric chairs, and mechanical lifts stored in 3 of the hallways.3. There were 2 paper cups and a plastic drip tray for a hand sanitizer dispenser laying on the handrail to the left of room [ROOM NUMBER].4. There was a box of gloves on the handrail and a green mesh bag containing trash bags hanging on the handrail outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. A tour of the A and B wing nursing unit on 1/7/26 at 9:55 AM revealed the following observations: 1. In room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a trash bag with linens laying on the floor beside the A bed to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with staff and resident representative (RP) it was determined that the facility failed to keep a representative updated and notified of changes in condition and refusals of treatments including medications. This was evident for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #7) reviewed during a complaint. The findings include:Review of complaint #2666803 on 1/7/26 at 1:35 PM revealed representative concerns for Resident #7 that they were not notified regarding changes in the resident condition when s/he had a fall and then was transferred to the hospital for altered mental status days later. Resident #7's family representative was interviewed on 1/7/26 at 2:35 PM. The submitted complaint information was reviewed regarding the failure of the facility to notify her of changes in condition related to an 11/7/25 fall. Additionally, she stated that there was a plethora of failures to notify her of changes throughout the residents' stay. Continued review of Resident #7's medical record on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to respond to a resident's concern by failing to provide a resolution. This was evident for 1 (#10) of 3 residents reviewed for grievances. The findings include:On 1/9/26 at 12:15 PM a review of 9 grievances received by the facility revealed 2 grievances regarding Resident #10. On 12/9/25 three concerns regarding Resident #10 were reported to the social services staff. The statement was that the briefs leaked more than the previous ones and the resident's clothing had a urine smell more frequently, there were 2 medical shoe boots missing, and the smell of construction was bothering the resident. The form noted that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) investigated the grievance. The response failed to mention the concern about the incontinence briefs leaking. It was signed as resolved on 12/10/25. A second grievance form dated 12/24/25 that was completed by unit manager (UM) #4 was regarding Resident #10's incontinence briefs leaking on his/her clothing and smelling of urine. The resident noted that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and review of the facility abuse policy, it was determined that the facility staff member failed to treat a resident with respect and free from verbal abuse. This was evident during the review of 1 of 8 facility reported incidents and complaints (Resident #3). The findings include: Review of the facility reported incident 2634927 on 1/8/26 at 3:10 PM revealed that on 10/3/25 at approximately 4:10 PM during the 4 PM smoke break a verbal altercation occurred between activity assistant staff #12 and Resident #3. According to a statement from the investigation, Resident #3, who was unable to be interviewed during the survey process due to independent activities, stated that when activity assistant staff #12 came out to the smoking area he asked the group if they wanted to listen to music and the majority of the people said they didn't want to listen to the music. However, staff #12 went ahead and played the music anyway. Resident #3 reported that s/he didn't like the music choices because they were derogatory in nature, inappropriate for public…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 51 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of a facility reported incident 2598625, medical record review, interview with facility staff and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents medications were free from misappropriation. This was evident for 1 of 1 allegation of misappropriation.The findings include:The facility reported incident 2598635 was reviewed starting on 1/7/26 at 2:50 PM. The facility had initially only provided the initial report and an initial report that was sent to the Board of Nursing regarding staff RN #3, the previous Unit A manager. According to what was provided, on 8/11/25 the previous unit manager took 2 sheets of narcotics (Oxycodone) from a medication cart and destroyed them without following proper procedures including having a witness. Staff RN#3 also left early that day and failed to notify the nurse of that medication cart. Therefore, when the nurse that was working on that cart went to appropriately waste the medication from her cart, she found that it was already gone. She contacted staff RN #4, asking if she did it.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse was reported to the state agency (SA) within the required 2-hour timeframe. This was evident for 2 (Resident #1 and 2598625, 2593945 ) of 7 residents/investigations reviewed for abuse allegations.The findings include: 1. A medical record review for Resident #1 on 1/9/26 at 10:36 AM revealed a care plan meeting note initiated on 8/12/25 at 3:19 PM by unit manager (UM) #4 was incomplete. Another care plan meeting note was entered by Social Services Director (SSD) on 8/13/25 as a late entry for 8/12/25 at 10:33 AM, indicating the care plan meeting occurred at that time. On 1/8/26 at 4:19 PM a review of the facility's investigation file for the facility reported incident #2593945 revealed the initial report form that documented Resident #1 made an accusation that 2 male therapists kicked him/her in the chest and stomach. Staff documented they became aware of the allegation of abuse on 8/12/25 at 4:00 PM and failed to include to whom it was reported. Review of the final…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation and ensure a written record of the investigation was maintained. This was evident for 2 (#1 and #5) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse allegations and an incident (2598625) regarding misappropriation. The findings include: Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. 1. A medical record on 1/9/26 at 11:29 AM for Resident #5 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with the assessment reference date of 10/10/25. Review of the MDS revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment. Staff documented in section F that it was very important for the resident to choose if s/he wanted a shower or a bed bath. Staff documented in section I that the resident had a diagnosis of chronic pain syndrome (which is chronic pain associated with significant psychosocial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, interview and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the verification of the narcotic count at the end of each shift was signed and completed. This was evident for 1 of 2 medication carts on the A wing. The findings include:The narcotic logbooks for the A wing were reviewed on 1/7/26 secondary to a facility report from August 2025 that there were discrepancies when the previous Unit Manger allegedly wasted narcotics without a witness.Review of the narcotic logbook on 1/7/26 at 3:10 PM revealed multiple days between August 2025 and December 2025 where staff failed to ensure that there were 2 nurses verifying the narcotic count at shift change.The unit manager for Unit A, staff # 2, was interviewed on 1/7/26 at 3:15 PM about the process for signing out narcotics and what is to occur at shift change. She stated that 2 nurses are to sign each shift and if someone works a double shift, they are to do the narcotic count with the shift supervisor. She was notified at that time of the multiple holes that were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on random observations, interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to keep resident medications secure from vulnerable residents. This was evident during a random tour of the facility.The findings include: During tour of the facility on 1/8/26 at 4:20 PM upon approaching the C/D unit, a medication cart was observed pushed up against the nursing station. On this medication cart were; 2 insulin syringes, 2 hypodermic needles, and Budesonide (steroid inhaler). There was a ward clerk sitting at the desk and the C/D unit manager staff #13 was observed in her office, however, neither were assigned to or in charge of the medication cart. The facility Nurse Practice Educator (NPE), staff #14 arrived down the same hall minutes after this surveyor walked down and immediately made the same observations and was seen looking for the nurse that belonged to the medication cart that was observed against the nursing station. He was notified by this surveyor of the same observations, time frame of waiting and that this surveyor too was waiting for the nurse. He then spoke to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure required information was sent to the hospital when the resident was transferred. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 1) out of 2 resident complaints. The findings include: On 4/10/25, a review of Resident #1's closed medical record revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was transferred to the hospital on 3/24/25. Review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation to indicate the resident's care plan goals were sent to the hospital when the resident was transferred on 3/24/25. No documentation was found to indicate the education provided included review of the specific information required to be sent to the receiving facility at the time of transfer. In an interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) on 4/10/25 at approximately 11:25 AM, the DON stated that Resident #1 was sent back to the hospital to be evaluated for wandering into other resident rooms, being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide a notice of discharge to Resident #1 before or during before being sent back to the hospital on [DATE]. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 1) out of 2 resident complaints. The findings include: On 4/10/25, a review of Resident #1's closed medical record revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was transferred to the hospital on 3/24/25. Review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation to indicate the resident's care plan goals were sent to the hospital when the resident was transferred on 3/24/25. No documentation was found to indicate the education provided included review of the specific information required to be sent to the receiving facility at the time of transfer. In an interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) on 4/10/25 at approximately 11:25 AM, the DON stated that Resident #1 was sent back to the hospital to be evaluated for wandering into other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide documentation to Resident #1 or the responsible party before being transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 1) out of 2 resident complaints. The findings include: On 4/10/25, a review of Resident #1's closed medical record revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was transferred to the hospital on 3/24/25. Review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation to indicate the resident's care plan goals were sent to the hospital when the resident was transferred on 3/24/25. No documentation was found to indicate the education provided included review of the specific information required to be sent to the receiving facility at the time of transfer. In an interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) on 4/10/25 at approximately 11:25 AM, the DON stated that Resident #1 was sent back to the hospital to be evaluated for wandering into other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice to Resident #1 or the responsible party before being transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 1) out of 2 resident reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 4/10/25, a review of Resident #1's closed medical record revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was transferred to the hospital on 3/24/25. Review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation to indicate the resident's care plan goals were sent to the hospital when the resident was transferred on 3/24/25. No documentation was found to indicate the education provided included review of the specific information required to be sent to the receiving facility at the time of transfer. In an interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) on 4/10/25 at approximately 11:25 AM, the DON stated that Resident #1 was sent back to the hospital to be evaluated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to issue an involuntary discharge to Resident #1 before being transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. This failure did not allow Resident #1 to become aware of all his/her legal rights as a resident in a Long Term Care Facility. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 1) out of 2 resident reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 4/10/25, a review of Resident #1's closed medical record revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was transferred to the hospital on 3/24/25. Review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation to indicate the resident's care plan goals were sent to the hospital when the resident was transferred on 3/24/25. No documentation was found to indicate the education provided included review of the specific information required to be sent to the receiving facility at the time of transfer. In an interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) on 4/10/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-24 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — widespreadEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was prepared in a form designed to meet the needs of individuals with alterations in their ability to chew and swallow. This was evident during 1 of 1 observation of meal preparations in the kitchen. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents on a therapeutic diet. The findings include: Some individuals may require food consistency to be altered due to their inability to chew and/or swallow. If the consistency required for a resident is not followed, it could result in the resident having food blocking their airway or entering their lungs resulting in serious breathing complications. A pureed Diet has a pudding-like texture that is smooth, blended, or pureed. A mechanical soft diet consists of foods that are easily chewed and swallowed, often involving modifications like chopping, grinding, or pureeing to create a softer texture, and is suitable for individuals with difficulty chewing or swallowing During a kitchen observation on 3/19/25 at 13:27 PM Pureed food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of the Kitchen it was determined that the facility failed to maintain food service equipment in a manner that ensures sanitary and safe food service operations. This was evident during multiple observations of the kitchen food service operations. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all Residents. The findings include: During observations in the kitchen on 3/17/25 at 8:40 AM the freezer was found to have a buildup of ice and an ice sickle hanging from a pipe connected to the cooling unit. Further investigation showed ice [NAME] had formed on the wire food rack below the pipe. Additional tracking of the ice led to the discovery of a clump of ice on top of a box of Vanilla Magic Cup Dessert below the ice [NAME]. The wire rack below the Magic Cups had a box of Precooked Lunch Patty with a layer of ice buildup on top of it. During an interview with the Kitchen Manager on 3/17/25 at 8:40 AM he said he had just noticed the ice buildup a couple of days ago. During an interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed 1) to use appropriate infection control practices such as Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during a high contact care for residents with indwelling urinary catheters, tracheostomy tube, feeding tube and wounds. This was evident for 3 (Resident #45, #384 and #386) of 51 residents reviewed for infection control practices during the recertification survey and 2) to properly store and handle personal clothing. This was evident during the observation of laundry services and has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: Per Centers for Disease Control (CDC), EBP are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition (e.g.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with access to their call bell. This was found to be evident for 4 (Resident #102, #29, #42, #25) of 4 residents reviewed for call bells. The findings include: On 03/17/25 between 09:00 AM and 09:45 AM, it was observed that Residents #42, #29, #102 and #25 did not have access to their call bells. When asked if they could demonstrate reaching their call bells, it was observed that each of these residents could not reach them. On 03/20/25 at approximately 2:00 PM, this surveyor was walking in the halls when Resident #102 called out from his/her room for the surveyor. Resident #102 reported that he/she was miserable and needed to sit up. When asked if the Resident had tried to call for help, he/she reported, No, I can ' t. The call bell was observed wrapped around the bed rail. The Resident was unable to reach the call bell. It was also observed that Resident #29 was not able to reach his/her call bell - it was lying on top of the nightstand where the Resident could not reach it. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) ensure the dignity of the residents as evidenced by the nursing staff (#7) not knocking on resident room doors before entering resident rooms and nursing staff (#8,9,10 and 11) not wearing a name tag and 2) provide an environment that promotes resident respect and dignity. This was evident for 3 (Resident #46, #112 and #76) of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. The findings include: 1) On 03/17/2025 at 08:20 AM the surveyor conducted an initial tour of the A/B Wing nursing unit. The surveyor observed 4 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) not wearing name badges. GNA #8, 9,10 and 11 on the A/B Wing nursing unit did not have name badges visible for Resident identification. At 10:15 AM on 03/17/2025 Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #10 was later observed with a piece of tape on her uniform with her name on the tape. At 10:55 AM on 3/17/2025 Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #11 entered room [ROOM NUMBER]. GNA #11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, surveyor record review and facility staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1) a resident that was dependent on dialysis and 2) the resident's discharge status. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #112 and #132) of 2 residents reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. The findings include: Hemodialysis is a treatment that filters waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no longer able to do so. It is a life-sustaining treatment for people with end-stage kidney disease. A person who receives hemodialysis requires an arteriovenous (AV) fistula shunt because it is the preferred method of vascular access for hemodialysis, providing a direct connection between an artery and vein, creating a larger, stronger blood vessel that allows for efficient blood flow and easier needle insertion during dialysis treatments. 1) On tour of A/B Wing nursing unit on 03/18/2025 at 09:00 AM the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for the use of oxygen. This was evident for 2 (Resident #45 and #46) of 51 residents reviewed for care planning during the recertification survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The care plan consists of focus, goal and interventions. 1) On 3/17/25 at 9:37 AM, Resident #45 was observed lying in bed. An oxygen concentrator (a machine that concentrates oxygen from the air) was on the left side of the resident's bed. The resident was on humidified oxygen at 2 liters/minute via nasal cannula that was connected to the concentrator. A nasal cannula consists of a flexible tube that is placed under the nose. The tube includes two prongs that go inside the nostrils to deliver oxygen. On 3/17/25 at 4:57 PM, a review of Resident #45's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct care plan meetings and failed to review and revise the residents' care plans. This was evident for 7 ( Resident #4, #23, #45, #105, #55, #76, #66, and #11) of 51 residents reviewed for care planning during the recertification survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each Resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the Resident's care. On 03/17/2025 at 08:20 AM the surveyor conducted a tour and interviewed Resident #4 and #23 on A/B Wing nursing unit. Resident #4 was interviewed at 11:39 AM regarding care plan meeting and Resident #4 stated what is that when asked if he/she was invited to care plan meeting and if he/she attended care plan meeting. Resident #23 was interviewed at 12:29 PM about care plan meeting and stated that he/she has not attended care plan meeting, but maybe my daughter attended the meeting. The surveyor reviewed Resident #4's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to residents with parenteral and intravenous (IV) access device. This was evident for 2 (Resident #23 and #385) of 2 residents reviewed for parenteral and IV care and services during the recertification survey. The findings include: Intravenous means within a vein. Most often it refers to giving medicines or fluids through a needle/catheter or tube inserted into a vein. This allows the medicine or fluid to enter your bloodstream right away. 1) On tour of the A/B Wing nursing unit on 03/17/2025 at 08:20 AM the surveyor observed Resident #23 with intravenous (IV) tubing attached to the IV needle/catheter in the right upper arm. Further observation revealed Resident #23 with an intravenous antibiotic infusing through the tubing into the IV needle/catheter in Resident's right upper arm. The intravenous tubing was not labeled and dated. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each Resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care services for residents by failing to 1) label oxygen administration equipment 2) put an oxygen order in place and 3) put up a sign Oxygen in use, no smoking. This was evident for (Residents #45 and #46) of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care during the recertification survey. The findings include: Oxygen therapy is a treatment that provides a person with extra oxygen to breathe in. It is also called supplemental oxygen. It is only available through a prescription from your health care provider. 1) On 3/17/25 at 9:37 AM, Resident #45 was observed lying in bed. An oxygen concentrator (a machine that concentrates oxygen from the air) was on the left side of the resident's bed. The resident was on humidified oxygen at 2 liters/minute via nasal cannula that was connected to the concentrator. A nasal cannula consists of a flexible tube that is placed under the nose. The tube includes two prongs that go inside the nostrils to deliver oxygen. However, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility did not provide drinks that adequately meet the needs of residents. This was observed in 1 (Resident #92) out of 1 resident observed for drink-related needs. The findings include: Nectar-thick liquids refer to liquids with a consistency similar to that of fruit nectars, milkshakes, eggnog, or tomato juice. The purpose of a nectar-thick liquid diet is to make swallowing easier and reduce the risk of liquids entering the airway. Thin liquids like water and juice can be thickened using special thickening packets, allowing them to reach the desired consistency, such as nectar-thick or honey thick. A dys-adv diet, also known as a dysphagia advanced diet, consists of foods that are close to normal textures but easy to swallow. These foods are typically moist, bite-sized pieces that resemble near-normal textures. This diet excludes hard, sticky, or crunchy foods, such as dried fruits or nuts, which could be difficult to swallow. A Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) test utilizes a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement measures to provide warm palatable food to the facility residents. This was evident for 2 of 2 test trays sampled and has the potential to affect all residents who receive meals from the facility kitchen. The findings include: A complaint was reviewed on 12/2/24 at 8:00 AM which included an allegation that the resident's meals were cold. During an interview on 12/2/24 at 10:46 AM, Resident #9 was asked about meal/food temperatures. S/he indicated that the food was not warm sometimes. On 12/2/24 at 12:01 PM, the surveyor requested a test tray during lunch service. At 1:03 PM, the food cart with the test tray was delivered to the C-wing accompanied by Staff #16 the Food Service Manager (FSM). The last tray was delivered from the tray cart to the residents at 1:28 PM and the test tray was sampled immediately afterward. The test tray contained a slice of roast pork, mixed vegetables and rice on a plate covered by a dome lid. There was no base or pellet under the plate. Pellets are metal disks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate assessments of a resident related to the use of 1. side rails and 2. functional use of extremities on the quarterly and annual minimum data set (MDS). This was determined during the review of side rails for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (#29, #5, #30). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure that each Resident receives the care they need The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 on 11/21/24 at 2:10 PM and observations on multiple occasions including on 11/21, 11/25 and 11/26/24 revealed the presence of 1/2 size side rails on the bed. A review on 11/25/24 at 2:29 PM of Resident #29's MDS, section 'P' restraints revealed for the first section 'A,' 'not used' was coded for bed rails used for the following assessments:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to removed their personal protective equipment based on the Centers for Disease Control's guidelines during a COVID 19 outbreak. This was evident for 1 of 1 COVID 19 unit. The findings include: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) - gloves, gowns, eye protection (safety glasses or shield), and mask. Center for Disease Control (CDC) 2007 Guidelines for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in a Healthcare Settings that was last updated 9/2024 states that for a resident on contact isolation, staff should remove their gloves and gown before exiting the resident's room. www.cdc.gov An observation of the designated COVID 19 unit on 11/21/24 at 8:42 AM, the hallway was cluttered on both sides with several items to include isolation bins sitting outside the resident's rooms and open trashcans. The isolation bins had drawers that were left open across from room [ROOM NUMBER]. The isolation bin outside of room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for their residents. This was evident for 3 (Unit A, B, D) of 4 nursing units. The findings include: 1. On 11/21/24 at 8:42 AM, the surveyor toured the A wing unit. The hallway that contained rooms 101 -120 was cluttered on both sides of the hallway leaving less than 3 feet to maneuver down the hallway. At the end of the hallway was an empty wheelchair (w/c) sitting in front of the exit door beside room [ROOM NUMBER]. Also lined up on the left side of the hallway were 2 w/c, dining room chair, isolation cart, trashcan, and a bed pan with a toilet plunger was on the left side of the hallway. On the right side was an isolation cart. Two beds and a dresser were in hallway between 115 and 116 and between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was two beds. Bedside tables, isolation cart, and a dresser were between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. An interview with the Unit Manager for Unit 2 on 11/21/24 at 9:28 AM, while she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the wishes of a resident as identified in his/her advanced directive and follow the wishes of the resident's representative for decision making purposes. This was identified for 1 (#5) of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Advance Directive is a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law related to provision of health care when the individual is not able to make their own decisions. A Maryland MOLST (Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form is used for documenting a resident's specific wishes related to life-sustaining treatments. The MOLST form includes medical orders for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and other medical personnel regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation and other life-sustaining treatment options for a specific patient. The findings include: A review was completed on 11/21/24 at 9:20 AM secondary to a complaint for Resident #5 submitted by a family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview with staff it was determined the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse timely to the State Agency. This was evident for 1 (#8) of 43 residents reviewed during the complaint survey. The findings include: Facility reported incident #MD00205961 was reviewed on 11/25/24 at 12:47 PM. The report revealed that on 5/22/24 at approximately 5:30 PM, Resident (R)#8 reported to Staff #21 a Licensed Practical Nurse, that s/he was hit on the right and left cheek at approximately 3:00 AM by a male and female staff member. The facility reported the allegation of abuse to the state agency on 5/22/24 at 10:30 PM, 5 hours after staff were made aware of the allegation, not within 2 hours as required. The Director of Nursing was made aware of these findings on 11/25/24 at 1:55 PM.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of resident abuse. This was evident for 1(#6) of 43 resident's reviewed during the complaint survey. The findings include: Facility report #MD00206238 was reviewed on 11/22/24 at 12:08 PM. The report indicated that, on 6/2/24, a family member reported that Resident (R)#6 was struck on the hand by Staff #19 a receptionist on the night of 5/31/24. The report also included that R#6's family member indicated the resident's roommate confirmed it was true. The facility investigation documentation included an assessment of the resident and statements from staff. The facility was unable to conclude that the alleged abuse occurred. However, during their investigation the facility failed to interview R#6's roommate and other residents. During an interview on 11/25/24 at 11:00 AM, Staff #5 an Assistant Director of Nursing, confirmed she investigated R#6's 6/2/24 allegation of abuse. She indicated that her process for investigating included talking to the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to assess residents (resident #22 and #28) after a significant change, a reduction of elopement risk score, causing the residents to be monitored using a elopement deterrent device when it was not necessary. This was evident for 2 out of 43 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Findings include: 1.Review of resident #22's medical record on 11/22/24 at 11:09 am revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a stroke left the resident unable to care for him/herself. The stroke caused the resident to require a cane to assist with the resident's balance while walking. The resident was assessed by two physicians on 12/18/15 and 12/30/15 to lack adequate decision-making capacity. Additional review of resident #22's medical record on 11/22/24 at 11:30am revealed that the resident eloped from the facility on 8/3/23. The facility assessed the resident for elopement risk after the 8/3/23 elopement and determined that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to update the resident's care plan after a change in status (Resident # 1). This was evident in 1 of 43 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 11/21/24 at 1:03 pm, the surveyor reviewed facility reported incident MD00197571 and complaint MD00211157 sent to the Maryland's Department of Health Office of Health Care Quality Long Term Care Unit in 9/2023. The complaint and the facility reported incident expressed concern from resident #1's family regarding the resident's g-tube care. Review of Resident #1's medical records on 11/21/24 at 1:30pm revealed the resident had several incidents when his/her g tube became dislodged, and the resident needed to be transferred to the local hospital for a g tube replacement. The resident was sent out for g tube replacement after the resident's g tube became dislodged on the following dates: 8/20/22, 9/3/23, 7/10/24, and 10/7/24. The facility investigation for each incident determined that facility staff did not cause the g tube to be dislodged.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to document that care was provided to a resident that was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL). This was evident during the review of a complaint for 2 of 3 (#11 and # 16) residents related to quality of care. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure that each Resident receives the care they need The findings include: 1. Review of the complaint #MD00180328 revealed concerns related to quality of care and activities of daily living (ADL) and care for incontinence episodes provided in 2021. Resident #11 had since been discharged to the hospital and expired. Review on [DATE] at 10:19 AM revealed multiple days where staff failed to document that care related to bowel and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a process to determine if residents with a history of trauma received the appropriate trauma informed care. This was evident for 1 (25) of 3 residents reviewed for trauma informed care. The findings include: A medical record review for Resident #25 on 11/25/24 at 9:30 AM revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed no evidence that an assessment or care plan had been completed to ensure the resident received trauma informed care. On 11/25/24 at 1:13 PM, an interview with Social Worker #7, stated that trauma informed care assessment was done on admission, and annually. Social Worker #7stated that the facility was not administering the trauma informed care assessment at the time s/he was admitted . Social Worker #7 further stated that the trauma informed care assessment was presently incorporated in facility assessments. Further record review revealed that a trauma…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to assess a resident for the use of side rails when there was a documented change in condition in the resident's functional status. This was evident for 2 of 2 residents observed and reviewed (#26 and #3) during a complaint survey. Bed rails -Adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed. They are available in a variety of types, shapes, and sizes ranging from full to one-half, one-quarter, or one-eighth lengths. Synonymous terms are side rails, bed side rails, and safety rails. The findings include: 1. On 11/21/124 at 2:10 PM, the surveyor toured and observed Resident #26 lying in bed, leaning to the right with his/her face against the right-side rail. S/he was making motions with the left arm but could not grasp the side rail. Resident #26 was reviewed and observed secondary to a facility report (FRI) related to Resident #26 having a fractured nasal bone from falling out of bed over the side rails Record review on 11/21/24 at 2:30 revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors as evidenced by facility staff failing to administer medications in accordance with professional standards. This was evident for 1 (#17) of 1 resident reviewed for medication administration. The findings include: Medication is to be administered according to the five rights of medication administration: right person, right medication, right route, right dosage, and right time. On 12/2/24 at 11AM, a review of Complaint MD00199498 alledged that Resident #17 medications were not given as prescribed by the physician. A record review of Resident #17's medication administration audit for 11/2023 revealed Resident #17 had been receiving his/her medications late on a regular basis. On 11/23/23, the following medications were administered outside the 1-hour time frame: Tylenol tablet 325 mg by mouth 3 times a day via G-Tube. It was scheduled for administration at 8 AM,12 noon and 8 PM, however this medication was administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician was notified of lab results. This was evident for 1 of 5 lab results reviewed. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident # 27 on 12/2/24 at 11:55 AM revealed multiple comorbidities including uncomplicated diabetes of which medication coverage was recently stopped and anemia (when you have low levels of healthy red blood cells to carry oxygen throughout your body). The facility Nurse Practitioner (NP) saw Resident #27 on 10/12/22. During that visit, she reviewed the previous labs that were completed on 9/19/24 and the resident's active diagnosis including leukocytosis (a condition where the white blood cell (WBC) count in the blood is higher than normal) that was noted on the previous lab report with no 'apparent source of infection.' The NP ordered a repeat CBC (complete blood count, a blood test that measures the number and quality of cells in your blood, including red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets) for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0775 — isolatedKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an ordered lab report was available on the chart for review. This was evident for the review of 1 of 5 labs reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident # 27 on 12/2/24 at 11:55 AM revealed multiple comorbidities including uncomplicated diabetes of which medication coverage was recently stopped and anemia (when you have low levels of healthy red blood cells to carry oxygen throughout your body). The facility Nurse Practitioner (NP) saw Resident #27 on 10/12/22. During that visit, she reviewed the previous labs that were completed on 9/19/24. The NP ordered a repeat CBC (complete blood count a blood test that measures the number and quality of cells in your blood, including red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets) for the morning of 10/13/22. Surveyor reviewed the paper and electronic medical record. The lab report and results for the 10/13/22 lab was not available on the chart. This surveyor requested the lab report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, and record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to honor resident food preferences. This was evident for 1(#9) of 43 residents reviewed during the complaint survey. The findings include: A complaint alleging that residents food preferences were not honored by the facility staff was reviewed on 12/2/24 at 9:53 AM. The complainant indicated that Resident (R)#9 did not like shrimp, so when shrimp was served, R#9 did not eat. In an interview on 12/2/24 at 12:01 PM, Staff #16 the Food Service Manager (FSM) was asked to describe the process for honoring the residents' food preferences. She explained that the actual dislikes were not listed on the resident meal ticket, that preferences were entered into the system, the alternative food item would print on the resident's meal ticket for each meal that the disliked item is served, and staff would provide the alternative rather than the disliked item. She indicated either she or the Dietician were responsible for identifying the residents' dislikes. She was asked to provide the surveyor with a list of food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility administration failed to provide a surveyor with QA and risk management records after an incident when a resident (resident #41) sustained injury from being burned by a hot liquid. This was evident for 1 out of 43 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Findings include: On 12/2/24 at 10:45 am, the surveyor reviewed complaint MD00176117 sent to the Maryland's Department of Health Office of Health Care Quality Long Term Care Unit in 12/2021. The complaint expressed concern from resident #41's family regarding the facility's failure to monitor the resident, causing the resident to be burned by hot liquids. Review of Resident #41's medical records, on 12/2/24 at 11:30am, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] due to complications involving Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The resident required extensive assistance and modified drinkware/utensils when eating due to numbness in hands and fingers as a result of MS. Change in condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility administration failed to maintain QA and risk management records for five years after a resident was discharged from the facility. This was evident for 1 (resident #41) out of 43 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Findings include: On 12/2/24 at 10:45 am, the surveyor reviewed complaint MD00176117 sent to the Maryland's Department of Health Office of Health Care Quality Long Term Care Unit in 12/2021. The complaint expressed concern from resident #41's family regarding the facility's failure to monitor the resident causing the resident to be burned by hot liquids. Review of Resident #41's medical records on 12/2/24 at 11:30am revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] due to complications involving Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The resident required extensive assistance and modified drinkware/utensils when eating due to numbness in hands and fingers as a result of MS. Change in condition documentation on 12/4/21 revealed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medication cart observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that residents medical records were kept in a confidential manner. This was evident in 1 out of 9 medication carts. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) / Treatment Administration Record (TAR) is commonly referred to as a drug chart, its report serves as a legal record of the drugs administered to a patient at a facility by a health care professional. This record is a permanent record in the patient's medical record/chart. The findings include: On 01/26/20 at 10:10 A.M. on A-wing Long Term Care Unit, the surveyor observed on top of a standing unattended medication cart in front of room [ROOM NUMBER], an opened Treatment Administration Record (TAR) book that was not kept in a confidential manner. There were visible nursing notes concerning residents' medications, treatment orders and wound measurements with comments visible for public viewing. This practice involved resident's R#82, R#127,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medication carts were not left unlocked and unattended. This was evident for 1 of 4 observations of medication carts. The findings include: During an observation of Nursing Wing D that took place on 1/26/20 at 11:00 AM, it was noted that a medication cart was unlocked and unattended on the unit. Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #15 was present at the end of the hallway and stated that the cart was used by the nurse. GNA #15 also identified that Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #16 was responsible for the cart that morning. LPN #16 was located in one of the resident rooms on the D unit immediately. LPN #16 joined the surveyor at the mediation cart and confirmed it was unlocked, describing it as the G-tube (gastrostomy tube) cart. The nurse demonstrated that the cart contained medication for residents who had a G-tube, as well as, other supplies necessary to care for residents with G-tubes. LPN #16 locked the cart at that time, stating that she did not know that it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-07-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to treat residents with respect and dignity by knocking on resident's room doors before entering rooms. This was evident for 2 out of 39 residents (R#10 and R#68) during the survey process The findings include: On 7/23/18 at 3:00 PM an interview occured with Resident #68 and a family companion to Resident #68 at bedside with the room door closed. The Surveyor observed that both Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA), staff #3 and #4, knocked on Resident #68's room door. However, they entered the room without waiting for the resident to grant staff permission to enter his/her room during the interview. On 7/23/18 at 3:05 PM during staff interviews, with (GNA's) staff members #3 and #4, both stated, they both knocked on the resident's door and didn't wait for permission from the resident to grant permission to enter the room. On 7/25/18 at 12:35 PM during an interview with Resident #10 and his/her family member, the door to the room was closed. The Surveyor observed that Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2018-07-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This has the potential to impact all residents. The findings include: An interview on 7/20/18 at 11:00 AM with Resident #10 took place in the resident's room at his/her bedside. The surveyor observed flies flying around and landing on Resident's #10 face, hands, arms, chest, and bedding which R#10 replied I have and use my fly swatter to keep the flies off of me but what can I do. On 7/23/18, 7/24/18, 7/25/18, 7/26/18 and 7/15/18 the surveyor observed that flies were still in Resident #10's room and flying and landing on and around the resident. On 7/25/18 at 1:00 PM during a staff interview with the B-Wing Unit Nurse Manager who accompanied the surveyor to Resident #10's room, it was verified and observed that flies were still flying and resting on and round Resident #10. On 7/25/18 at 10:30 AM a staff interview ws conducted with the facilities Director of Maintenance who replied that he/she had the pest control contractor in the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-07-27 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews the facility staff failed to document interdisciplinary Care Plan Meetings that informed Resident #31 of the resident's admission status and discharge planning. This was evident for 1 out of 39 residents investigated during the survey process. The findings include: On July 20, 2018 at 10:30 AM while interviewing Resident #31, the resident was asked if the resident was aware of what was going on with therResident. Resident #31 expressed to the writer that no one talks to the resident, and that the resident did not know what was going on. Review of the residents' record revealed documentation about the resident, 8 times from 11/10/17 - 5/3/18. At no time did the Social Worker document any meetings with the resident or the resident's daughter at a care plan meeting or discuss anything about the resident's status or any plans for the resident's future. During a meeting with the Social Worker on 7/24/18 at 11:17 AM, the Social Worker confirmed that the meetings never took place.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-07-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews the facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #76's finger nails and hands were clean when assessed. This was evident for 1 out of 39 residents investigated during the survey process. The findings include: On 07/23/18 during resident interviews, the surveyor noted that both of Resident #76's hands were contracted. Further assessment of the resident's hands revealed dirty fingernails with a broken nail hanging from the 5th digit of the left hand. Both hands were noted to have a foul odor to them. The surveyor notified the Unit 2 Manager. It is the staffs responsibility to maintain appropriate hygiene for residents needing extensive assistance, for infection control, and to maintain resident dignity.
- Potential for harm · D2018-07-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review it was determined the facility failed to document activities conducted with Resident #232. This was evident for 1 of 39 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: Residents #232 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has multiple diagnoses which include a stroke. The resident requires extensive assistance from staff for personal care and is dependent upon staff for transferring from the bed into a Geri chair. A Geri chair is an upholstered recliner on wheels that can be pushed around like a wheelchair. The resident also breathes through a tracheotomy and requires oxygen and suctioning at times. On 7/23/18 and 7/24/18, Resident #232 was seen up in a Geri chair in his/her room and was not observed attending activities or receiving activities in his/her room. According to his resident's Activity Care plan initiated on 7/11/18, the resident likes to go out of the room to attend religious services or sit outside and likes to stay in his/her room to read,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-07-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews the facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #31 had a sufficient amount of oxygen in the portable oxygen tank prior to transferring the resident to Therapy. This was evident for 1 out of 39 residents investigated during the survey process. The findings include: On 07/20/18 at 10:40 AM while interviewing Resident #31, the resident complained that the facility ran out of oxygen for the resident and had to go and find some for the resident. On 07/25/18 around 3:10 PM the writer observed the resident being pushed down the hall from the room for therapy by Staff #6. The writer observed the resident with a portable oxygen tank on the wheel chair and the cannula in the resident's nose. This writer stopped staff #6 and asked to see the O2 (oxygen) tank. The O2 tank gauge was in the red section that said replace. When the staff saw that the tank's gauge was in the red zone the staff yanked the tank out of the holder stating this needs to be replaced and proceeded to exchange the portable oxygen tank. The Surveyor asked staff #7 in Physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-07-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly dispose of expired medications. This was evident in 2 out of 8 medication storage areas observed during the survey process. The findings include: 1) On 7/20/2018 at 10:00 A.M. the surveyor observed expired medications in one of the medication carts on D wing. The expired medication was Hydrocortisone Acetate 25 mg Suppositories that were individually packaged. 4 of the suppositories had an expiration date of 6/2017 and 3 of the suppositories had an expiration date of 5/2017. The Unit Manager of D wing confirmed that the medications were expired. 2) On 7/20/2018 at 10:30 A.M. the surveyor observed expired medication in one of the medication carts on A wing. The expired medication was a multi-use bottle of low dose 81 mg aspirin. The expiration date was 4/2018. The Unit Manager of A wing was made aware and confirmed that the medication was expired.
- Potential for harm · D2018-07-27 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and review of medical records, the facility failed to follow the Doctors orders for 1 resident (#107) out of 39 during the investigation phase of the survey process. The findings include: On 7/20/2018 the surveyor observed on two occasions that Resident #107 heals were lying flat on the bed. This occurred at 11:27 A.M. and 1:02 P.M. on 7/20/2018. The Doctors order were written on 6/7/2018 that Resident #107 heals were to be, float both heels at all times while in bed. Interview with the Director of Nursing confirmed that the Doctors orders are for float both heals at all times while in bed. But that the resident keeps kicking the pillows out from under his/her legs. Failure not to follow the doctor's order has the potential to cause harm to the resident. The facility is responsible to find a way to keep the heals elevated at all times while in bed.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-07-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and review of medical records, it was determined that the facility staff failed to properly document in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). This occurred for one resident (#107) surveyed during the investigation stage of the annual facility survey. The findings include: On 7/26/2018 at 11:00 AM a review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) and the facility's Progress Notes for July 6, 7, and 18 of 2018 revealed that an order for Float Both Heels At All Times was not filled out for Resident #107. The Progress Notes did not support that the staff elevated the resident's heels on those dates. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 7/26/2018 at 12:00 PM verified that the documentation was not done and that the documentation was required for that resident to be assessed daily. Failure to keep resident heels off the bed has the potential to cause unnecessary skin brake down for Resident #107.
- No harm found · B2026-01-09 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have 3 years of survey results available for residents, family members, and visitors to review. This was evident during the survey. The findings include:On 01/07/2026 at 12:18 PM a review of the survey binder that was on the table in the front lobby, failed to reveal the last 3 years of survey results. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 01/07/2026 at 12:20 PM revealed he had reviewed the binder. He stated the standard was to have 1 year of survey results available in the binder. Reviewed the concerns with the NHA.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$21,764 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $11,406 — penalty dated 2026-01-09
- $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-03-24
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.1 | -2.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 84 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 84; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC MD OPCOS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/01/2021 |
| PC WTA OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2021 |
| SMS 2021 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2021 |
| SILVERBERG, NISANEL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/01/2021 |
| STEIN, SHALOM | Individual | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $959K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215151. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.