No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Complete Care at Maple Grove LLC

3401 Maple Grove Dr., Madison, WI 53719 · For profit - Corporation · 184 certified beds · (608) 845-1000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0609, F0610) — most recent May 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$153,657 in federal fines3 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (82) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $153,657 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-05)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3102 Meriter Way · (608) 417-8800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.3 mi
6601 Mckee Rd · (608) 848-8285 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3197 Maple Grove Dr · (608) 410-7050 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4350 Mounds Park Rd · (608) 437-5711 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3102 Prairie Rd · (608) 515-8855

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.3%16.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.4%5.1%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.9%2.1%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%2.7%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.2%5.7%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.3%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.2%18.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.0%16.9%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%5.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control35.4%24.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.9%15.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.8%82.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.2%23.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.1%15.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.051.661.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.372.291.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 143 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
72.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 72.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.4%CMS range 39.5–54.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 7.5–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge72.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.7–12.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.841.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.04
RN hours/ resident / day
0.70
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.23
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.97
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.74
RN hoursweekends
64.0%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 184 beds and averages 110.1 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 74 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.04 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.23 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.18 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.16 to 0.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-05)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-02)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

82 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 65 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident (R) received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for altered diets out of a total sample of 6. R2 has had two choking episodes within a month's time. On 7/27/24, R2 choked on a hot dog. The Heimlich maneuver was performed, and R2 was sent to the emergency room and admitted to the hospital for acute hypoxic respiratory failure, aspiration event/choking on a hot dog, and aspiration pneumonitis. On 8/13/24, R2 was to receive a Level 6: soft and bite sized (no hot dogs), thin liquids consistency diet. CNA G (Certified Nursing Assistant) provided R2 a bowl of chunked honeydew that was not part of a Level 6 soft and bite sized diet with his supper, resulting in an aspiration event and another hospitalization. The facility's failure to supervise R2 and ensure R2 received food items consistent with R2's prescribed diet created a finding of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 8/13/24. Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each staff implemented proper safety interventions as directed by a resident's plan of care and did not ensure residents were free from accidents and hazards for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls. On [DATE], a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) attempted to provide care to R1 without maintaining the proper safety interventions as directed in R1's care plan. R1 rolled off the bed and fell approximately 2 feet to the floor, hitting her head. R1 suffered multiple fractures and a subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space surrounding the brain), resulting in death. This created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE]. The facility's failure to to ensure all staff follow proper safety interventions to prevent accidents created a finding of Immediate Jeopardy that began on [DATE]. Surveyor notified the NHA A (Interim Nursing Home Administrator) of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 1:30 PM. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure fall interventions were in place per the care plan and each residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 3 of 23 sampled Residents (R27, R59, & R82) reviewed for falls and supervision. R27 is being cited at scope/severity level 3 (isolated/actual harm). R27 was a fall risk and has had 23 falls since admission on [DATE]. R27's falls typically occurred in the dining room or resident room; there were similarities to the falls including location and time of day. The facility completed a root cause analysis (RCA) and collected data on the falls; however, there is no evidence the interdisciplinary team (IDT) comprehensively reviewed the data or considered increasing R27's supervision. R27 fell resulting in a head injury requiring sutures. R59 is at risk for falls and is care planned to walk with her walker and to have a sign in her room to remind her to walk with her walker. Surveyor observed two instances on different…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure that the facility was free of accident hazards in 1 of 7 residents R9 reviewed for accident hazards of 14 sample residents. The facility failed to prevent a fall for R9 Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Prevention Program, dated 02/28/25, indicated Policy: Each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls. Definitions: A fall is an event in which an individual unintentionally comes to rest on the ground, floor or other level, but not as result of an overwhelming external force .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The facility utilizes a standardized risk assessment for determining a resident's fall risk. A. The risk assessment categorizes resident according to low, moderate, or high risk .5. Low/Moderate Risk Protocols: a. Implement universal environmental interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for supervision and accidents. R5 was served coffee while in his bed and dropped the coffee cup in the bed on his right side which pooled up against him. R5 sustained superficial partial thickness burns to right flank and right buttocks, estimated approximately 7% Total Body Surface Area (TBSA). Facility had no process in place regarding safety to residents with hot liquid temping or any type of safety assessment. After the incident occurred, coffee brewers were temped at 185° Fahrenheit. Evidenced by: The facility policy titled Food Safety: Preventing Burns dated 2021, states, in part: Policy: Hot food and beverages will be served at a safe temperature that prevents burns. Procedure: 1. Staff will monitor hot food and beverage temperatures at the point of service . 5. Appropriate supervision to obtain hot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY UNCORRECTED AT VERIFICATION VISIT. See SOD for Event ID OC8I11. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision or fall interventions were in place for residents who required increased supervision to prevent accidents/hazards from occurring for 2 of 5 sampled Residents (R5 and R7). R5 did not have fall interventions in place. R5's care plan documents: Do not leave unattended in the Bathroom. R5 ambulated independently to the bathroom and her alarm was sounding. CNA N (Certified Nursing Assistant) heard the alarm sounding and identified that R5 ambulated independently to the toilet. CNA N turned the alarm off, exited the room, and shut the door leaving R5 unattended in the bathroom. CNA N did not assist R5 or alert other staff that she had self-transferred on the toilet. CNA N is aware that R5 is not to be left alone in the bathroom and does not use her call light for assistance. Ten (10) minutes later R5 ambulated independently from the bathroom and fell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not implement professional standards of practice to prevent pressure injuries (PI) from worsening for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for PIs, out of a sample of 34 residents (R104). The facility did not ensure weekly measurements/assessments and treatments were being completed to R104's sacral PI. MD (Medical Doctor) notifications were not done when changes were noted to the wound. R104 was admitted to the facility with a stage 2 PI which progressed into a stage 4 PI causing R104's PI to become infected and R104 was placed on antibiotics. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy, entitled Pressure Injuries (Management/Treatment,) with a revision date of 12/22, states, in part: The purpose of the policy is to help assure residents with pressure injuries prompt assessment, treatment, and services by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to promote healing, prevent infections and prevent new injuries from developing while maintaining optimal quality of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored, and distributed. This has the potential to affect all 103 residents who reside in the facility.Surveyor observed food not properly covered in the walk-in refrigerator.Surveyor observed a scoop left in the flour bin.Surveyor observed a kitchen staff with facial hair not wearing a beard restraint.Surveyor observed food brought in by family members not properly labeled and dated.Evidenced by:The facility policy, Food Safety requirements, dated 1/26, states, in part;.labeling, dating, and monitoring refrigerated food, including, but not limited to leftovers, so it is used by its use-by date.keeping foods covered or in tight containers.Dietary staff must wear hair restraints (e.g., hairnet, hat, and/or beard restraint) to prevent hair from contacting food.The facility policy, Use and Storage of Food Brought in by Family or Visitors, dated, 3/26, states, in part.All food items that are already prepared by the family or visitor brought in must…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal hygiene for 5 of 21 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs out of a sample of 25. R15 was observed in bed without access to a call light. R41 was observed in bed without access to a call light. Surveyor observed R11 to not have a call light within reach. Surveyor observed R24 to have long facial hair. R75 was observed in bed without access to a call light. Evidenced by: The facility's Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response policy, dated 1/26, states, in part: The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. 5. Staff will ensure the call light is within reach of resident and secured, as needed. 6. The call system will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents are clinically appropriate to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 residents (R2) observed with medications at bedside out of a sample of 25. R2 was observed on 2 separate occasions to have medications left on her bedside table for her to take independently. R2 does not have an assessment for self-administration of medications indicating that she is safe to administer medications independently.This is evidenced by:The facility's policy, Resident Self-Administration of Medication, dated 1/26, includes: A resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medications may be self-administered safely. Each resident is offered the opportunity to self-administer medications during the routine assessment by the facility's interdisciplinary team. The results of the interdisciplinary team assessment are recorded on the Medication Self-Administration Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not make prompt efforts to document, investigate, and resolve grievances a resident may have for 1 of 3 residents (R121) from a total sample of 25 residents reviewed for grievances.R121 voiced a grievance to the facility. Staff did not write his concern up as a grievance, complete an investigation, or follow up with the complainant. This is evidenced by:The facility's policy, titled Resident and Family Grievances, reviewed/revised in 2/2026, states in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's and family member's right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal, or fear of discrimination or reprisal.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The Administrator has been designated as the Grievance Official. The Grievance Official or their designee is responsible for overseeing the grievance process; receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusion; leading any necessary investigations by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not follow through with the appropriate steps of the PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) process for 1 of 9 residents (R2) reviewed for PASARR screening out of a sample of 25.R2 did not have a level II PASARR screening completed.This is evidenced by:The facility's policy, Specialized Rehabilitative Services, dated 1/26, includes: It will also ensure that residents with Mental Disorder (MD), Intellectual Disability (ID) or related conditions receive services as determined by their Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder.R2's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, accepted date 6/12/26, has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15. This indicates R2 is cognitively intact. R2's PASARR Level I Screen Summary, undated, includes:Does this person have a major mental disorder? YESScreening Result Resident is suspected of having a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that Residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R5) of 6 residents reviewed for assessments out of a sample of 25 residents.R5 fell and facility did not complete on-going monitoring and assessments, and the following evening R5 went to ER by ambulance.The facility policy, Fall Prevention Program, dated 1/25, states, in part;.monitor for changes in resident's cognition, gait, ability to rise/sit, and balance.monitor vital signs in accordance with facility policy.document all assessments and actions.R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses including stroke, difficulty in walking, and unspecified fall.R5's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) indicates R5 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 8 indicating R5 is moderately cognitively impaired.R5's most recent care plan states, in part;.resident is at risk for falls and history of falls.R5 experienced a fall on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice (SOP), to prevent pressure injuries (PI) for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for pressure injuries of a total of 25 sampled residents.R1 is at risk for PI (pressure injury) development and has a history of pressure injuries. Staff did not obtain measurements for two weeks of a newly developed pressure injury, and failed to ensure that care planned interventions were in place to prevent worsening of the pressure injury.Evidenced by:The AMDA (American Medical Directors Association) clinical practice guideline titled, 'Pressure Ulcers and Other Wounds,' dated 2017, states in part: .A pressure ulcer (Injury) is localized damage to the skin or underlying soft tissue, usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. The ulcer may present as intact skin or as an open ulcer and may be painful. The ulcer occurs as a result of intense or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents from occurring for 1 of 4 residents (R31) of 25 sampled residents reviewed for safety concerns.R31's Care Plan instructed that he was to be given plastic silverware at meals; however, he was repeatedly observed to be given regular silverware at meals.This is evidenced by:The facility's policy, titled Accidents and Supervision, reviewed/revised in 3/2026, states in part: Policy: The resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as is possible. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. This includes: 1. Identifying hazard(s) and risk(s). 2. Evaluating and analyzing hazard(s) and risk(s). 3. Implementing interventions to reduce hazard(s) and risk(s). 4. Monitoring for effectiveness and modifying interventions when necessary.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with an indwelling catheter received the appropriate care and services to prevent infections or complications for 1 of 1 resident (R95) reviewed for catheters out of 25 sampled residents.Surveyor observed R95's suprapubic indwelling catheter bag to be resting in direct contact with the floor.This is evidenced by:The facility's policy, titled Catheter Care, implemented 11/2025, states in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy while indwelling catheters are in use. Policy Explanation: .2. Privacy bags will be available and catheter drainage bags will be covered at all times while in use.The CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) lists the following recommendation from the Guideline for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (2009): Keep the collecting bag below…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 3 residents (R102) reviewed for trauma informed care out of a sample of 25 residents.R102 disclosed trauma and does not have a complete trauma assessment or a care plan addressing triggers, resident specific approaches, or interventions.This is evidenced by:The facility's policy, Trauma Informed Care, dated 1/26, includes: It is the policy of this facility to provide care and services. and address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. The facility will use a multi-pronged approach to identifying a resident's history of trauma. This will include asking the resident about triggers that may be stressors or may prompt recall of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
Show the remaining 65 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the hospice services meet professional standards and principles that apply to individuals providing services in the facility for 1 of 1 resident (R44) reviewed for hospice services out of sample of 25 residents. R44 was receiving hospice services and the facility failed to obtain hospice care plan and notes. Evidenced by: The facility policy titled Coordination of Hospice Services, dated 1/26, states, in part: Policy: When a resident chooses to receive hospice care and services, the facility will coordinate and provide care in cooperation with hospice staff in order to promote the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Policy Explanations and Compliance Guidelines: . 2. The facility and hospice provider will coordinate a plan of care and will implement interventions in accordance with the resident's needs, goals, and recognized standards of practice. 3. The plan of care will identify the care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure Residents are free of significant medication errors for 1 of 10 sampled Residents (R3) Facility staff did not administer R3's scheduled Parkinson's medications as ordered. Findings include: Review of the package insert, Sinemet CR, dated 03/2020, and located at https://mohpublic.z6.web.core.windows.net/IsraelDrugs/Rishum_14_228460120.pdf, indicated, Always take SINEMET CR exactly as instructed by your doctor. Take them at regular time intervals according to your doctor's instructions. Do not change the times at which you take your tablets. You should not take SINEMET CR tablets at intervals of less than 4 hours apart. If you forgot to take SINEMET CR at the specified time do not take a double dose to make up for a forgotten dose. Resume your regular dosing schedule and consult the doctor. Review of the manufacturer [NAME] Pharmaceuticals access data, Sinemet CR, located on the FDA website, revised 07/2014, and located at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 of 1 incident reviewed.RN C (Registered Nurse) burned sage in the facility and the facility did not verify that the sage was extinguished and did not provide education to the staff regarding safety.Evidenced by:Surveyor requested policy related to fire safety / flames in building. No policy provided.Facility email from RN D to NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) and DON B (Director of Nursing), dated 7/18/25, states, in part: .came into work today, 7/17/25.at about 11:30 PM, smelled marijuana so strong, so I started to walk through all the units, but the smell remained at the atrium.asked RN C about the smell and RN C admitted stating it is me don't say nothing please I am burning sage the smell will go away. Then she demanded for me to give her the narcotic box key stating want to count.I walked away.RN C came back to me erratic requesting the narcotic box key the second time then I became suspicious that she is impaired at this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect all 94 residents who reside at the facility. Surveyor observed staff taking temperatures of food during lunch meal. Staff did not take temperatures of all foods on steam table. Surveyor observed staff taking temperatures of food during lunch meal. Staff did not allow time for thermometer to dry after using alcohol wipe and placed directly into food. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Record of Food Temperatures, dated, 2/25, states, in part; .6. Measure and record the temperatures for each food product and milk at all meals. Record temperature on temperature log. 7. When holding hot foods for service, food temperature should be measured when placing it on the steam table line .14. Food temperatures will be verified using a thermometer which is both clean, sanitized and calibrated to ensure accuracy . On 4/30/25 at 11:03 AM, Surveyor observed DA Q (Dietary Aide) taking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that every resident was treated with respect and dignity for 2 of 2 sampled Residents (R71 & R146) and 2 of 2 supplemental Residents (R13 & R67) reviewed for Resident rights. R13, R67, R71, and R146 expressed concerns about R82 wandering into their private rooms uninvited. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled Promoting/Maintaining Resident Self-Determination dated 4/22/25 states: It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights by facilitating resident self-determination through support of resident choice. The facility will ensure that each resident has the opportunity to exercise his/her autonomy regarding those things that are important in his/her life such as food, interests, and preferences. Example 1 R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include: vascular dementia, hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure drugs and biological's used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional practices and include the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed for compliance. Surveyor observed the following: R36's fluticasone propionate nasal spray did not have an open date and R36's Systane Ultra Ophthalmic Solution 0.4- 0.3% eye drops had an open date of 3/15/25. R45's PRN (as needed) Hydralazine card expired on 2/22/25. R32's PRN Chest Congestion Relief card expired 2/27/24 and PRN ondansetron card expired on 2/22/25. R48's PRN stimulant laxative card expired on 2/27/24. R194's PRN calcium antacid card expired on 2/25/24. R16's PRN ondansetron card expired on 2/22/25. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Medication Storage dated 2/28/25 states in part .4. Unused Medications: All medication rooms are routinely inspected by the consultant pharmacist for discontinued, defective, or deteriorated medications with worn, illegible, or missing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents are clinically appropriate to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 residents (R17) reviewed for self- administration of medications. R17 was observed to have a cup of medications left on her bedside table for her to take independently. R17 does not have an assessment for self-administration of medications indicating that she is safe to administer medications independently. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Resident Self- Administration of Medication dated 4/17/25 states in part, .3. When determining if self- administration is clinically appropriate for a resident, the interdisciplinary team should, at a minimum consider the following: a. The medications appropriate and safe for self- administration; b. The resident's physical capacity to open medication bottles, administer injections. c. The resident's cognitive status, including their ability to correctly name their medications and know what conditions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not document a thorough investigation and did not resolve grievances as outlined in the facility policy for 1 of 4 residents (R26) reviewed for grievances. R26 voiced concern about staff being on their cell phones. The facility failed to follow up on the grievance. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Resident and Family Grievances, dated 10/23, states, in part; .3. The Grievance Official is responsible for overseeing the grievance process; receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusion; leading any necessary investigations by the facility; maintaining the confidentiality of all information associated with grievances and notifying the person filing the grievance of the decisions and outcome . Surveyor reviewed January 2025 Resident Council Minutes. Minutes indicate R26 voiced concern about staff on their personal cell phones while working. On 4/30/25 at 1:53 PM, Surveyor observed LPN HH (Licensed Practical Nurse) on their personal cell phone attempting to open a bank account. On 4/30/25 at 1:57 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident is free from physical restraints that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for restraints (R27). R27 was placed in a low Broda chair (a specialty wheelchair that assists with positioning) that has brakes located on the back of the wheels at the bottom of the chair. R27's brakes were engaged while R27's was at the dining table, not allowing R27 to move the chair. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Restraint Free Environment dated 2/2025 states in part .Physical Restraint refers to any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. Physical restraints may include, but are not limited to: .Using devices in conjunction with a chair, such as trays, tables, cushions, bars or belts, that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan to meet personal preferences and goals, or address the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 3 of 23 residents (R53, R70, and R28). R53's care plan does not include a focus, goal, or interventions for religious preferences. R70's care plan does not include a focus, goal, or interventions for religious preferences. R28's care plan was not followed for using the interpretive services to communicate with R28 in her preferred language. Evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans states, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident's rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and ALL services that are identified in the resident's comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop a discharge plan that reflected the resident's goals for 1 of 23 residents (R76) reviewed for discharge planning. R76's discharge care plan did not match his discharge goals. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Discharge Planning Process dated 2/28/25 states in part . Procedure: 1. The facility will support each resident in the exercise to participate in his or her care and treatment, including planning for discharge. 2. The facility will determine the resident's expected goals and outcomes regarding discharge upon admission, routinely in accordance with the MDS (Minimum Data Set) cycle, and as needed .b. Subsequent assessment information and discharge goals will be included in the resident's comprehensive plan of care .5. If discharge to the community is a goal, an active discharge care plan will be implemented and will involve the interdisciplinary team, including the resident and/ or representative. The plan shall be documented on (list…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that 2 of 19 Residents (R53 and R70) received the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing in accordance with their comprehensive assessment and plan of care. R53 is a Muslim whose custom is to pray seven times a day. R70 is a Muslim whose custom is to pray seven times a day. Evidenced by: The facility policy, titled Quality of Care dated 2/28/25, states, in part: Policy: Based on comprehensive assessments, the facility will ensure that residents receive treatment and care by qualified persons in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the residents'' choices . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Each resident will be provided care and services to attain or maintain his/her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 2. A comprehensive care plan will be developed for each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide toileting assistance for dependent residents for 2 of 19 residents (R37 & R293) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) assistance. Staff did not assist R37 with toileting assistance after several incontinent episodes despite R37 requiring toileting assistance per his plan of care. R293 was observed sitting in the dining room in his pajamas with his hair sticking up, and scraggly (not neat or even) whiskers on his face approximately 1/4 inch long. Evidenced by: Facility policy, titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), dated 2/25, states, in part: Policy: The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate . Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care; 2. Transfer and ambulation; 3. Toileting . Policy Explanation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident with a pressure injury (PI) received necessary treatment and services, consistent with standards of practice to promote healing for 1 of 3 residents (R40) reviewed for PIs. R40 has a stage 4 pressure injury, with physician orders to not be in her wheelchair for more than an hour at a time, to be repositioned every 30 minutes while in her wheelchair and to not lay on her left hip while in bed. R40's interventions were not completed as ordered. Evidenced by: Surveyor requested the facility's policy regarding Pressure Injury's; however, none was provided. R40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: hypertensive chronic kidney disease (high blood pressure within the kidneys), trochanteric bursitis (inflammation of small, fluid-filled sac on the outer edge of the left hip), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 5 residents (R31) reviewed for pain. R31 was admitted to the facility with chronic pain that became exacerbated with the use of the EZ stand lift. The facility did not address her pain needs or seek alternative transfer options. Evidenced by: The facility policy titled Pain Management, dated 2/8/25, states in part, The facility must ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents goals and preferences . Recognition: . In order to help a resident attain or maintain his/her highest practicable level pf physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and to prevent or manage pain, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to follow the prescribed easy to chew diet for 1 of 1 resident (R6) reviewed for proper diet texture out of 14 sampled residents. R6's diet orders stated Level & easy to chew. R6 had several snacks in R6's room that did not follow this diet order. The facility failed to have an order in R6's medical record indicating exceptions to the diet order or a risk and benefit to consume items outside the diet order. Findings include: Review of the undated document provided by the facility titled: Level 7: Easy to Chew revealed: This diet is for individuals who have difficulty chewing and/or swallowing regular textured foods. This diet requires the ability to bite soft foods and chew and orally process food for long enough that the person forms a soft cohesive - bolus that is swallow ready. Tongue force and control is required to move the food for chewing and to keep it within the mouth during chewing, and tongue force is required to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 1 out of 14 sample residents (R5) reviewed for medical records. R5's plan of care had confliciting information regarding R5's ability to self-administer medication. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 02/28/25, revealed It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and ALL services that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment and meet professional standards of quality .5. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS assessment. Review of R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-11 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure correct installation, use, and maintenance of bed rails for 4 of 5 (R3, R6, R7, and R8) residents reviewed. R3, R6, R7, and R8's bedrails were installed without a Bed System Measurement Device Test ompleted to ensure proper installation to reduce the risk of entrapment. Findings Include: The Facility policy, Bed Devices and Device Assessment, date of issue, March 21, 2024, indicates, in part: Policy .2.Physical devices will be reviewed for safety and used according to manufacturer's recommendations. 5.Physical devices include, but are not limited to, side rails (half or full); grab bars, halo bars, positioning poles . The Facility policy, Bed Inspection, date of issue, March 21, 2024, indicates, in part: Policy - It is the policy of this facility to conduct bed inspections to prevent entrapment and other safety hazards associated with bed rails, frames, and mattresses .The facility will conduct regular bed inspections, utilizing an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (R1). R1 fell out of bed due to facility staff''s failure to follow R1's plan of care and the facility did not ensure all staff were trained to help ensure a similar event did not occur. Findings include. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) includes a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. Her care plan states she is an assist of 2 with bed mobility due to potential for complications with deficits with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Her [NAME] states, Bed mobility - 2 assist. Roll slowly. Quarter bedrails on left and right sides of bed. Additionally, her [NAME] states she requires a Hoyer lift and 2 staff for transfers. On 10/27/24, the facility documented the following incident for R1: Around 10:50 AM, writer was charting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents (R) receiving a psychotropic medication, were free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 1 residents (R1). R1 receives psychotropic and antipsychotic medications. The facility is not tracking quantitative measurements during behavior tracking, which is required to measure efficacy of medication therapy, nor are side effects of psychotropic medications being adequately monitored. R1 does not have an appropriate diagnosis for antipsychotic medication. This is evidenced by: Facility policy entitled Unnecessary Medication - Psychotropic Medication, Dated April 1, 2008, with last revision date September 22, 2017, states in part: .A. 2. Antipsychotic drugs should not be used unless the resident's medical record clearly indicates that the resident has one of more of the following specific conditions: . i. Demented illnesses with associated behavioral symptoms . 3. A. Criteria: Since diagnoses alone do not warrant the use of antipsychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 of 5 randomly sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), who had been employed at the facility for over a year, had documented performance reviews (CNA J, CNA K, and CNA L). CNA J, CNA K, and CNA L's annual performance evaluations were not conducted yearly. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Competency Assessment and Validation, dated 6/12/2024, states, in part: SSM Health (SSM) will ensure all employees are competent to perform their assigned responsibilities and to establish a consistent and effective process to measure staff competence unique to job classifications, duties and responsibilities .II. Competency Process . B. Validation . 2. Competency should be assessed annually. On 9/12/24, Surveyor reviewed the list of CNAs that had worked for the facility longer than one year. The employment list documented: CNA J was hired on 10/12/2015. CNA K was hired on 6/29/2006. CNA L was hired on 10/27/1999. On 9/12/24, Surveyor reviewed the provided CNA yearly performance review documentation that was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was a need to alter treatment for 1 of 4 residents (R5) reviewed for physician notification. The facility did not update R5's physician when a medication was not administered as ordered. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy Notification of Change with a revision date of 11/2022, indicates, in part: Policy - The community will consult the resident's physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant and notify the resident representative or an interested family member when there is: .Acute illness or a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (i.e., deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications). A need to alter treatment significantly (i.e., a need to discontinue or change an existing form of treatment due to adverse consequences or to commence a new form of treatment)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure prompt resolution of all grievances for 1 of 4 reviewed (R8) out of a sample size of 8 residents. R8 said that R8's recent concern was not followed up on. R8 indicated about a week ago an agency CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) became frustrated with R8 because R8 needs help with setting up her meal. R8 stated the CNA was frustrated and left R8 sitting in bedroom unable to eat her meal. Evidenced by The facility policy, Grievance Process, dated 11/22, states, in part; .It is the policy to support each resident's right to voice grievances and to assure that after receiving a complaint or grievance to seek a resolution and keep the resident appraised of progress. Prompt reporting is encouraged so that constructive action can be taken. It is the goal of the community to resolve grievances as quickly as possible to the satisfaction of the resident and/or person initiating the grievance . R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported to the administrator and other officials in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse of a total sample of 8. R1's daughter emailed NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) a verbal abuse allegation that the facility did not report to the State Agency. This is evidenced by: The Facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy and Procedure, dated November 2023, documents in part: .It is also the policy of this community to take appropriate steps to ensure that all alleged violations of federal or state laws which involve mistreatment, neglect, abuse, injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property (alleged violations) are reported immediately to the administrator of the community .it must be reported to the State agency immediately but no later than two hours after forming the suspicion per State and Federal regulation . Per Facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate accusations of abuse for 2 of 5 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for abuse. On 6/6/24, the facility became aware of an allegation of neglect involving R2 and a thorough investigation was not completed. R1 did not have a thorough investigation completed for a reported verbal abuse allegation. This is evidenced by: The Facility policy titled Caregiver Misconduct, Patient Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property, and Harassment, revised 11/17/23, indicates in part: Outcome Statement: To ensure timely and thorough investigations and reporting of all incidents in a healthcare setting where patients are abused, neglected, harassed, or where their property is misappropriated. To ensure compliance with Federal and State laws and regulations .Definitions: .II. Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment, with resulting physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or death. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not implement professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent pressure injury (PI) development for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for pressure injury out of a sample of 8 residents. R3 is at risk for PI. The facility did not implement PI interventions to prevent PI development. R3 developed an avoidable PI to her left foot bunion (a bony bump that forms on the joint at the base of the big toe). R3's PI became infected requiring oral antibiotics. Evidenced by: The facility policy, titled Pressure Injury/Skin Integrity with a revision date of 5/24, states in part: It is the policy of this facility to enable nursing staff to manage wounds and select appropriate interventions according to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPUAP). Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, (facility) will ensure .A resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents (R) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for diabetic foot care for 1 of 3 (R3) residents reviewed for diabetic foot out of a sample of 8 residents. The facility did not provide diabetic foot checks to R3 daily in accordance with the current standards of practice. Evidenced by: Facility policy, titled Foot Care - Diabetic with a revision date of 10/22, states, in part: The community will ensure that residents receive proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health. For those residents with the diagnosis of diabetes: .2. Provide foot care daily . The current standard of practice per the American Diabetes Association copyright 1995-2024, https://diabetes.org, includes, in part: .1. Check your feet daily for sores, cuts, cracks, blisters, or redness . Example 1 R3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. R3's Physician Orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and safety to prevent accidents from occurring for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents/supervision (R6). R6 had a fall on 6/27/24 and staff failed to maintain 1:1 supervision that had been implemented for safety concerns. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Accidents/Falls ., with a review date of November 2023, indicates, in part: Policy - The facility strives to promote safety, dignity, and overall quality of life for its residents by providing an environment that is free from any hazards for which the facility has control and by providing appropriate supervision and interventions to prevent avoidable accidents . R6 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include, in part: Other Frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, Muscle Weakness, Other Reduced Mobility, and Muscle Weakness. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicates a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biological's to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (R5). R5 had a physician order for Vitamin B Complex-C Oral Capsule (B Complex with C) and the facility did not ensure this medication was available for administration. This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled, Pharmacy Services (General) with a reviewed date of May 2020, includes in part: The community pharmacy provides routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to the residents .The community provides pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquisition, receipt, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident. The community obtains the services of a licensed pharmacist who: 1. Provides consultation on all aspects of the provisions of pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility has not established an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This has the potential to affect all 106 residents (R) in the facility. The facility did not ensure daily infection control surveillance for staff. The facility's infection control line lists for staff and residents are incomplete. The facility's monthly infection control rates were not calculated according to current standards of practice. The facility's March 2024 COVID outbreak summary was incomplete and inaccurate. CNA G did not disinfect R80's bedside table after placing a urinal on it without a barrier in place. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program (General), with a reviewed/revised date of 2/2024, includes, in part: Policy: The community will maintain an organized,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II when it was realized that a resident would reside in the facility for more than 30 days. This affected 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for PASARR out of a total sample of 27 (R89, R41) and 2 supplemental residents (R36, R103). R89, R41, R36, and R103 stayed longer than 30 days in the facility and required a PASARR Level II screen, but the facility failed to complete. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), revised 1/2017, includes: . Complete a PASARR Level I screen on all new admissions . Those residents whose attending physician has certified, before admission to the community that the individual is likely to require less than 30 days of nursing facility services, do not require a PASARR (Level 2 screen) to be completed. Example 1 R41 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Generalized Anxiety Disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This affects 3 of 3 sampled residents (R41, R79, R24) reviewed for activities out of a total sample of 27 and 4 supplemental residents (R42, R53, R22, and R59). R41, R79, R24, R42, R53, R22, and R59 voiced concerns during Resident Council of the facility's activity program. Evidenced by: (It is important to note the facility has two separate resident neighborhoods, one is called long term care and the other is a semi-locked unit called memory care.) The facility policy, entitled Activities, issued February 2021, includes, in part: . Policy: To provide each resident with activities and lifestyle choices that are appropriate, stimulating, and promote the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of the residents . Procedure: The program provides appropriate activities for each resident, Activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional practices and include the expiration date when applicable in 1 of 2 medication rooms and 4 of 7 medication carts reviewed for compliance. Surveyor observed the following: --undated, open stock medication in medication room. --medications that should be refrigerated were in the medication carts and not refrigerated. --undated, open eye drops in a medication cart. --different medication administration routes co-mingled in the same bag. --unlabeled medications in medication carts. --expired medications in medication carts. --medications with illegible expiration dates in medication cart. This is evidenced by: Surveyor reviewed the facility Medication Storage policy with a reviewed date of 1/24. Policy, in part, Medications and biologicals are store properly, following manufacturer's or provider pharmacy recommendations, to keep their integrity and to support safe, effective drug…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Example 3 R83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 2/14/24, R83's Nurse Practitioner (NP) ordered a urinalysis due to dysuria with urination. Records indicate the urinalysis was collected on 2/14/24 at 7:50 PM. A nursing home visit note, dated 2/15/24, states, .Ampicillin 500 QID started--culture still pending . Results returned on 2/16/24 at 10:14 AM that stated, >=100,000 CFU/mL mixed gram-positive flora. No further workup performed .suggest recollection if clinically indicated. R83's NP again visited him on 2/19/24 with the NP noting, Patient treated for UTI due to gross hematuria and positive UTI, culture showed mixed morphology. Plan to stop treatment--he will have had a 5 day plus one tablet coarse. Continue to monitor. Facility Medication Administration Record (MAR) for R83 indicates the Ampicillin order was 4 times per day for 10 days, starting 2/15/24. R83 took this antibiotic three times on 2/15/24, four times on 2/16/24--2/19/24, and once on 2/20/24. On 5/2/24 at 9:45 AM, Surveyor interviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported to the administrator and other officials, and that the residents are protected during the facilities investigation for 2 of 3 abuse investigations reviewed (R43 and R41) of a total sample of 27 residents. During R43's investigation, the alleged staff member named in allegation was not suspended per the facility's Abuse Policy and Procedure. On 4/17/24 the facility became aware that R41's narcotic pain patch was unable to be located and this was not reported to the administrator. This is evidenced by: The Facilities Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy and Procedure, dated November 2023, documents in part: .It is also the policy of this community to take appropriate steps to ensure that all alleged violations of federal or state laws which involve mistreatment, neglect, abuse, injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate a potential misappropriation of a narcotic medication for 1 of 2 residents (R41) reviewed for abuse. On 4/17/24 the facility became aware of a potential misappropriation involving R41's narcotic pain patch and this was not reported to the Nursing Home Administrator so that an investigation could be completed. This is evidenced by: The Facility Policy, titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, with a reviewed date of November 2023, indicates, in part: Policy: it is the policy of this community to take appropriate steps to prevent the occurrence of Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of resident property .The community investigates each such alleged violation thoroughly .Procedure: .Investigation: a. Any person who knows or has reasonable cause to suspect that a resident has been or is being abused, neglected, or exploited shall immediately report such knowledge or suspicion to the administrator .c. Allegations of abuse, neglect, or exploitation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure comprehensive assessments were completed as required for 1 of 3 closed records reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (R12). R12 passed away on [DATE] and the facility failed to complete a discharge MDS assessment. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled MDS (Minimum Data Set) Timing, dated [DATE], includes It is the policy of this community to follow the guidance for the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Manual when determining the timing of MDS assessments. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' RAI Version 2.0 Manual, includes: Factors Impacting the Skilled Nursing Facility Medicare Assessment Schedule: . Resident expires or transfers .If a resident dies or is discharged . whatever portions of the RAI that have been completed must be maintained in the resident's discharge record . A discharge- return not anticipated is completed when it is determined that the resident is being discharged with no expectations of return . A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the assessments must accurately reflect the resident's status for 1 of 1 (R43) Minimum Data Set reviewed for accuracy of a total sample of 27. R43's MDS dated [DATE] does not have her Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP; machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep) coded correctly. This is evidenced by: The Facility does not have a Policy and Procedure for MDS accuracy. The Facility follows the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual. Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual dated 10/23, documents the following, in part: .The RAI process has multiple regulatory requirements. Federal regulations at 42 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 483.20 (b)(1)(xviii), (g), and (h) require that (1) the assessment accurately reflects the resident's status . R43's Physician Orders include: - CPAP orders start 6/16/22 R43's MDS dated [DATE] documents the following, in part:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed for wound out of a total sample of 27 residents (R85). R85 does not have weekly measurements documented for left stump wound. This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled Pressure Ulcer/Skin Integrity with a reviewed date of 4/2022 contains, in part: Policy .A resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice . Procedure: 6. Documentation a. Routine ongoing documentation should be conducted related to the resident's skin condition and the resident's response to the care and treatment of the skin. The frequency of documentation shall be determined based on the resident's individual needs in accordance with accepted standards of practice. b. Wound documentation is more detailed than routine skin documentation and shall include information related to the wound based on a clinical assessment. Of note,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents are free of significant medication errors for 1 of 1 supplemental resident's (R19) reviewed for medication errors. R19 was not administered two doses of an antipsychotic medication in April as directed by the physician order. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Medication Administration, dated 1/23, states, in part: . Policy: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have familiarized themselves with the medication. Procedures: Medication Preparation: .3. Prior to administration, review and confirm medication orders for each individual resident on the Medication Administration Record . Medication Administration: 1. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber . Documentation:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure that food and drink that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 27 residents observed during dining (R7). R7 was given cold food. Findings include R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include dementia. Her most recent Minimum Dat Set (MDS), dated [DATE], did not include a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as she is rarely understood. Additionally, this MDS indicates R7 requires moderate assistance for eating and is able to perform less than half the task herself. On 4/29/24 at 11:42 AM, Surveyor observed R7 sitting at a dining room table, asleep in her wheelchair with a plate of food in front of her. Surveyor continuously observed this plate of food sit in front of R7 until 12:16 PM at which time CNA C (Certified Nursing Assistant) sat next to R7 and began feeding her a portion of the lasagna on her plate. R7's eyes remained closed and only slightly moved her lips to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility must develop policies and procedures to ensure that residents and/or the resident's responsible party receives education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunization prior to offering the immunization and documentation is noted in the medical record on whether the resident received or declined the immunization. This affected 3 of 5 residents (R41, R63, and R102) reviewed for pneumococcal immunizations. R41's medical record contained a consent form titled Pneumococcal Vaccine (Prevnar 20) Consent/Declination without evidence of administration. R63 and R102's medical records did not contain evidence of a declination, consent, or administration of Pneumococcal Vaccinations. This evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Immunization: Pneumococcal with a review date of 4/4/2024 indicates, in part: Policy: All residents are encouraged to obtain all pneumococcal vaccines for which they are eligible unless contraindicated. There is a system to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident for 6 of 15 (R4, R5, R7, R13, R18 and R21) residents reviewed for medications. R4, R7, R18 and R21 did not receive their medications as ordered. R5 did not receive her scheduled Lasix on 2/28/24. R13 did not receive her scheduled Tylenol Claritin, melatonin, and trazodone on 2/21/24. R13 did not receive her scheduled calcium on 3/2/24 and 3/5/24. R13 did not receive her scheduled magnesium on 3/25/24, 3/26/24, and 3/30/24. R21 did not receive scheduled Seroquel on 3/4/24 and did not receive scheduled lamotrigine on 3/8/24. Evidenced by: Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Medication Administration, dated 1/23, states, in part: . Policy: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with dignity and respect for 1 of 6 sampled residents (R1). R1's APOAHC (Activated Power of Attorney for Health Care) has chosen for R1 to see physicians outside of the facility. The facility failed to provide a support person to assist R1 so that she may attend medically necessary physician appointments. As evidenced by The facility's admission Resident Rights, undated, indicates the following: The resident has the right to be free of interference, coercion, discrimination, and reprisal from the facility in exercising his or her rights to be supported by the facility in the exercise of his or her rights. The resident representative has the right to exercise the resident's rights to the extent those rights are delegated to the resident representative. The facility has no policy and procedure regarding appointments, transportation, and supervision while at appointments. R1 was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not make prompt efforts to resolve resident grievances for 1 resident (R1) out of 7 residents reviewed for grievances, out of a total sample of 24 Residents. R1's APOAHC (Activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare) expressed concerns to the previous DON (Director of Nursing) regarding the way CNA C (Certified Nursing Assistant) treated R1. The facility did not record details regarding the grievance, has no documentation that the grievance was investigated, or any details regarding the allegation. This is evidenced by: The facility Policy and Procedure, Grievance Process, with a revised date of 11/2022, includes, in part: Residents have the right to voice grievances to the community or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished, as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and of other residents and other concerns regarding their stay…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure care plans were reviewed and revised for 1 (R1) of 20 sampled residents. Facility staff did not revise R1's care plan to address her need for a support person while out of the facility at appointments. Findings include: R1 was admitted to the facility 6/16/22 with diagnoses including, but not limited to dementia without behavioral disturbance, multiple sclerosis, fibromyalgia, polyosteoarthritis, cauda equina syndrome, muscle weakness, and optic neuritis. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 2/12/24 indicates a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 13 indicating she is cognitively intact. R1 was incapacitated 8/6/21 and has an APOAHC (Activated Power of Attorney for Health Care). R1's APOAHC lives out of the country. On 2/13/2024 at 1:00 PM, R1's Progress Note indicates the following: Called to front entrance to observe resident going out the door to wait for cab. This writer attempted to redirect resident unsuccessfully. Activities aide attempted to redirect resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents who are unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received the necessary services for assistance with incontinent cares for 3 of 6 residents (R16, R23, & R24) reviewed for ADLs. R16 indicates she has double briefs on almost every night due to being a heavy wetter. R23 indicated she has a blue liner and a pullup on due to being a heavy wetter. Surveyor observed a blue liner and pullup placed on R23 during am cares. R24 indicates she gets double briefed at times due to being a heavy wetter. This is evidenced by: Facility unable to provide policy on incontinence products. Example 1 R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and has diagnoses that include hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (another term for hemiplegia), urinary incontinence (loss of bladder control), history of urinary tract infections (an illness in any part of the urinary tract, usually starts when bacteria get…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that it was free of medication error rates of 5% or greater. There was 1 error in 12 opportunities that affected 1 out of 2 residents (R21) included in the medication pass task, which resulted in an error rate of 8.3%. R21 received the wrong dose of Venlafaxine. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Medication Administration, dated 1/23, states, in part: . Policy: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have familiarized themselves with the medication. Procedures: Medication Preparation: . 3. Prior to administration, review and confirm medication orders for each individual resident on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Compare the medication and dosage schedule on the resident's MAR with the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-08 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all residents have a means of directly contacting caregivers while in their room for 1 (R6) out of 11 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure R6 had call light pendent in working condition and near R6 while in R6 was in his room. Evidenced by: The facility policy, titled, Resident Call System, dated 5/20, states, in part; .All residents have call system access while in bed or while sitting at their bedside or in the bathroom. Residents who are unable to use their call system, due to decreased physical or mental ability, are so identified with needs anticipated to best of abilities. All staff responds promptly when the call system is activated. R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: paranoid schizophrenia, presence of intraocular lens, glaucoma secondary to other eye disorders, weakness, restless legs syndrome, respiratory failure, altered mental status, displaced fracture of base of neck of right femur,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated for 4 of 7 sampled residents (R2, R3, R5, R7). R2's self report, dated 10/22/23, was not thoroughly investigated. The facility did not ensure residents were protected when an allegation of abuse was reported for R3. R5 did not have thorough follow-up after responding to interview questions. R7 did not have thorough follow-up after responding to interview questions. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 1-2023, states, in part; .c. Allegations of abuse, neglect, or exploitation will be thoroughly investigated. The investigation will be initiated upon receipt of the allegation. The administrator, or designee, will complete the investigation process. d. The investigation can include, but is not limited to: i. The name(s) of the resident(s) involved ii. The date and time the incident occurred iii. The circumstances surrounding the incident iv. Where the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure all allegations of abuse were reported timely to the state survey agency (SSA) for 1 resident (R3) of 8 sampled residents. The facility failed to timely report to the SSA when an allegation of abuse was reported to administration. Evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, revision date 1-23, states, in part: .It is also the policy of this community to take appropriate steps to ensure that all alleged violations of federal or state laws which involve mistreatment, neglect, abuse, injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately to the administrator of the community. If the events that caused the allegation involve abuse or serious bodily injury, it must be reported to the State agency immediately but no later than two hours after forming the suspicion per State and Federal regulation. Events that do not involve abuse and/or do not result in serious bodily injury must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, and policy review it was determined the facility failed to ensure that physicians' orders were accurately implemented for 5 out of 8 residents Resident (R23, R6, R22, R24, R21) reviewed for medication errors. A review of the facility's Incident Audit report indicated at least five residents were administered medications incorrectly by facility staff. This failure placed these residents and potentially other residents at risk of harm. Findings include: According to the facility's ''Physician/GNP [Gerontologic Nurse Practitioner] Orders'' policy, revised 02/06/19, ''Outcome Statement: Physician/Gnp orders will be taken only by an SMCC [facility name] licensed nurse (RN [Registered Nurse] or LPN [Licensed Practical Nurse]) or pharmacist. It is the responsibility of the licensed nurse signing and noting the order (beneath the physician's signature) to ensure that all steps in this policy and procedure have been completed. The following medication orders require a second nurse verify that the order has been entered into the electronic medical record [a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to report a resident's missing pain patch, as outlined in their abuse policies related to the misappropriation of residents' property, for 1 (R11) out of 4 residents prescribed Fentanyl patches for pain. This failure placed R11 and other residents requiring the use of a pain patch at risk of breakthrough pain and for the unlawful use of the residents' property without their permission. Note: Fentanyl is a schedule II pain medication that is unlawful to use without a physician's prescription and the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and including injuries of unknown source are reported to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (R28). Findings include: A review of the facility's ''Abuse - Prevention of Including Misappropriation of Property'' policy, dated October 2010 defined ''Misappropriation of Resident Property .'' as ''The deliberate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to investigate a resident's missing pain patch, as outlined in their abuse policies related to the misappropriation of residents' property, for one out of four residents Resident (R11) prescribed Fentanyl patches for pain. This failure placed R11 and other residents requiring the use of a pain patch at risk of breakthrough pain and for the unlawful use of the residents' property without their permission. Note: Fentanyl is a schedule II drug that is unlawful to use without a physician's prescription. Findings include: A review of the facility's ''Abuse - Prevention of Including Misappropriation of Property'' policy, dated October 2010 defined ''Misappropriation of Resident Property.'' as ''The deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent.'' The facility's ''Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation'' policy, dated revised January 2023, noted '' . c. Allegations of abuse, neglect, or exploitation will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect all 104 residents. Raw hamburger was not being thawed in accordance with standards of practice. Clean dishes were found undried and stacked. Findings include Example 1 The Food and Drug Administration's 2022 Food Code states, under section 3-501.13: Time/Temperature Control for SAFETY FOOD shall be thawed: (A) Under refrigeration that maintains the FOOD temperature at 41 degrees Fahrenheit or (B) Completely submerged under running water: (1) At a water temperature of 70 degrees Fahrenheit or below, (2) With sufficient water velocity to agitate and float off loose particles in an overflow On 2/20/23 at 2:45pm, Surveyors observed two large tubes of raw hamburger submerged in water, lying on the bottom of the sink. The water was warm to the touch and the faucet was running. HC D (Head Cook) was nearby and confirmed she was thawing raw hamburger. When asked what the process is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure that garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. This has the potential to affect all 104 residents. On 2/15/23 at 9:28 AM, Surveyors observed the following outside, on the ground near the facility's main garbage dumpster: *8 gloves *A face shield *plastic CPAP/oxygen mask *Numerous broken plastic bottle caps *Opened/used feminine hygiene products *paper towels *Various pieces of scattered cardboard On 2/15/23 at 10:40 AM, NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) observed the garbage area and reported to Surveyors that the facility could use some improvements as it pertains to disposing of garbage and refuse properly. NHA A stated the task of cleaning the dumpster area is completed regularly but would be added to the monthly cleaning list to ensure consistent proper disposal and cleaning is carried out.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Example 15 R25 has the following diagnosis: Alzheimer's Disease, Osteoarthritis, Polyosteoarthritis, Anemia, Urge Incontinence, and Unsteadiness on Feet. R25's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], section B0700 indicates R25 is rarely or never understood. In R25's most recent MDS, section G0110 indicates extensive assist of two staff is needed with bed mobility and dressing. R25 is total dependent of 2 plus staff members for physical assist for transfers, hygiene and toileting. R25's Alteration in elimination care plan documents, in part: . check and change schedule: AM- 7am, 10am, 1pm and as needed . On 2/16/22 from 7:37 AM- 11:02 AM, Surveyor observed R25 sitting at the breakfast table and staying in the dining room area. At 9:30AM, Surveyor noted the smell of stool. On 2/16/22 at 11:07 AM, Surveyor observed R25's incontinent of a large amount of bowel and urine during personal cares with the assist of 2 CNAs. On 2/16/23 at 11:02 AM, Surveyor sought out and interviewed CNA I (Certified Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 6 of 26 residents reviewed for staffing (R25, R32, R45, R60, R35 and R83), as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnosis of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment. R25 was observed not receiving incontinent cares per her individualized care plan. Facility staffing census documentation indicates fewer staff hours than the Staffing Plan in the Facility Assessment for specified shifts. R32, R45 and R60 complained of long call light wait times. R35 complained of not receiving showers. R83 is fed by a family member due to lack of staff. Evidenced by: The facility's Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-27 · tag F0811 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that feeding assistants completed a state approved training course for 4 of 34 sampled residents (R83, R19, R38, & R24). A staff member reported to Surveyor that she assists R83, R19, R38 & R24 with dining and she has not completed a Certified Nursing Assistant Course or a state-approved paid feeding assistant training course and who, otherwise by Wisconsin law, should not be allowed to feed residents. FM V (family member) reported to Surveyor that her and a staff member assists residents with dining due to short staffing at the facility. This is Evidenced by: Facility unable to provide policy on paid feeding assistants as the facility does not offer a paid feeding assistant training course. Example 1 R83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and has diagnoses that include Vascular Dementia, Aphasia following Cerebral Infarction, and Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal Phase. R83's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Date Set) Assessment, dated [DATE] shows R83 is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not make prompt efforts to resolve resident grievances for 1 of 26 residents (R265) reviewed for grievances out of a total sample of 34 Residents. R265's family voiced a concern to the facility staff regarding R265's hearing aid being lost. The facility did not file a grievance or follow-up with the family to resolve these concerns. This is evidenced by: The Facility's grievance policy, titled, Grievance Process, with most recent revision dates of 3/2018 and 11/2022, includes, in part: Policy: Residents have the right to voice grievances to the community or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment .and other concerns regarding their stay in the community. The community will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances the resident may have .The Executive Director is the grievance officer and is responsible for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-27 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident's right to be free from physical restraints for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for restraints (R97) out of a total sample of 34 residents. The facility employed a full body-length pillow on the edge of R97's bed without an assessment for its use. Findings include The facility's restraint policy states the following: *A restraint is defined as any manual method or physical mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot easily remove and restricts movement or normal access to one's body. *Before a resident is restrained, the facility must determine that the resident has specific medical symptom that cannot be addressed by another less restrictive intervention and a restraint is required to treat a medical symptom, protect the residents' safety and help resident maintain his or her highest level of physical and psychological well-being. *There must be a ling between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with an indwelling catheter received the appropriate care and services to prevent a urinary tract infection (UTI) for 1 of 2 sampled residents (R104) and 1 of 1 supplemental resident's (R14) reviewed for catheters out of a total sample of 34 Residents. Surveyor observed R14's catheter bag uncovered and in direct contact with the floor. CNA L (Certified Nursing Assistant) did not perform proper hand hygiene during catheter/peri care on R104. Evidenced by: Facility policy & procedure entitled Catheter/Urinary Daily Care, undated, does not contain any information, approaches, and interventions for infection control. Example 1 R4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, anxiety disorder, spasmodic torticollis, history of urinary tract infections, history MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus) and resistance to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 6 residents (R96) of a total of 24 residents reviewed had a drug regimen free from unnecessary drugs. R96 did not meet criteria for collection of a urinalysis or meet criteria for antibiotic thearapy. As evidenced by The facility policy, Antibiotic Stewardship, undated, indicates in part, the following: The facility has established, implements and maintains an Antibiotic Stewardship Program designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use. The program includes prevention, overall oversight, tracking and reporting antibiotic use and outcomes, and education. The facility recognizes that antibiotic stewardship is a continuous process. Antibiotic overuse can increase the risk for serious diarrheal infections from Clostridium difficile, increased adverse drug events and interactions and colonization and/or infection with antibiotic-resistant organisms. Process: Prevention: A. Evaluate clinical signs and symptoms when a resident is first suspected of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that it was free of medication error rates of 5% or greater. There were 2 errors in 40 opportunities that affected 2 out of 4 residents (R54 & R19) included in the medication pass task, which resulted in an error rate of 5%. *R54 was administered nasal spray incorrectly. *MT (Medication (Med) Tech) administered R19 an enteric coated (ec) bisacodyl crushed. (enteric coating is a special coating that prevents the medicaiton from breaking down in the stomach) This is evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Nasal Medications, dated 1/1/22, states, in part: . Nasal medications may be installed with drops, spray, or aerosol (nebulizer) . PROCESS: . V. Atomizer (Nasal Spray): A. Resident should be sitting upright with head tilted back slightly. B. Occlude one nostril with finger. C. Insert atomizer tip into open nostril. D. Instruct resident to inhale and squeeze atomizer once, quickly, and firmly . The facility policy, entitled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-05-02 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the nurse staffing posting was accurate and posted in an accessible area which has the potential to affect the census of 106. Multiple daily staff postings did not reflect the actual hours of the nursing staff. The posting was posted up high on the wall with small text making it difficult to read. Findings include: On 5/2/24, Surveyor observed the posted nurse staffing (utilized to communicate to residents and the public daily staffing levels per census) dated 4/17/24, 4/18/24, 4/19/24, and 4/27/24 did not reflect the actual hours of the nursing staff. The Daily Census/ Staffing document reflects the first shift of each day begins at 6:00 AM to 2:30 PM, the second shift is 2:00 PM to 10:30 PM and the night shift is from 10:00 PM to 6:30 AM. On 5/2/24, Surveyor reviewed nurse staffing postings dated 4/17/24, 4/18/24, 4/19/24, and 4/27/24 and cross-referenced actual hours worked per the facility schedule and noted the following: On 4/17/24, the Daily Staff Roster (schedule) did not reflect that LPN D…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$153,657 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 3 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $58,354 — penalty dated 2025-05-05
  • $34,356 — penalty dated 2025-03-28
  • $12,048 — penalty dated 2024-10-21
  • $15,642 — penalty dated 2024-09-12
  • $15,239 — penalty dated 2023-12-04
  • $18,018 — penalty dated 2023-12-04
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-03 for 21 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-15 for 8 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-30 for 48 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.1-2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.3+1.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 84 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Complete Care At Chestnut Hill LLCPassaic, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care At HagerstownHagerstown, MD 1 of 5Complete Care At Harston Hall LLCFlourtown, PA 1 of 5Complete Care At Kimberly Hall NorthWindsor, CT 1 of 5Complete Care At Laplata LLCLaplata, MD 1 of 5Complete Care At Milford Manor LLCWest Milford, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care At Wayne Hills Rehab & Resp CenterWayne, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care at Care AgeBrookfield, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at KensingtonWaukesha, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at Margate ParkChicago, IL 1 of 5Complete Care at the BoulevardChicago, IL 2 of 5Complete Care At Brakeley ParkPhillipsburg, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Fox HillVernon, CT 2 of 5Complete Care At Harborage LLCNorth Bergen, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Harrington CourtColchester, CT 2 of 5Complete Care At HyattsvilleHyattsville, MD 2 of 5Complete Care At Inglemoor, LLCEnglewood, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Monmouth, LLCLong Branch, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Ocean Grove LLCOcean Grove, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Prospect Heights LLCHackensack, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Regent LLCHackensack, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Christian Home LLCWaupun, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Grande PrairiePleasant Prairie, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Heritage LLCDundalk, MD 2 of 5Complete Care at Linwood, LLCLinwood, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Nazareth LLCStoughton, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Voorhees, LLCVoorhees, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Wall LLCWall, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Fair Lawn EdgePaterson, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Holiday CityToms River, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Lehigh LLCMacungie, PA 3 of 5Complete Care At Oak Ridge LLCCharleston, WV 3 of 5Complete Care At Orange ParkEast Orange, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Phillipsburg, LLCPhillipsburg, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Severna Park LLCSeverna Park, MD 3 of 5Complete Care At Shrewsbury LLCShrewsbury, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Silver Lake LLCDover, DE 3 of 5Complete Care At SpringbrookSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Complete Care at Brick LLCBrick, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care at Corsica Hills LLCCentreville, MD

Showing 40 of 84; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PC WCM OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/28/2025
PC WCM TOPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/28/2025
PEACE CAPITAL HOLDINGS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/28/2025
SMS 2021 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/28/2025
KLUGMAN, JACOBIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
STEIN, SHALOMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
HELLMAN, YOSEFIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/28/2025
CHOLES, DIANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/02/2005
MAINA, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
MURPHY, SEANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
STERNBUCH, DANIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
DES CAPITAL LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
JRK INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
PC WCM PROPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
LEVERENTZ, LUANNEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$499K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 10%Other / private 25%

This home reported $499K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$513per resident / day
operating cost
$15,590per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$434per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525276. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next