Complete Care At Oak Ridge LLC
1000 Association Drive, Charleston, WV 25311 · For profit - Corporation · 74 certified beds · (304) 347-4372 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $16,039 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-25)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.7% | 14.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.6% | 6.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 13.7% | 7.6% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.7% | 4.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.1% | 15.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.1% | 27.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.6% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.8% | 22.1% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.4% | 13.4% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.0% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.8% | 79.4% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.3% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.4% | 11.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.06 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.20 | 1.84 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 84.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.5%CMS range 46.6–64.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 8.0–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 84.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 76.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 86.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 4.2–11.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 71.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-07-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed ensure each resident maintains acceptable perimeters of nutrition. They specifically failed to timely assess and/or address a significant weight loss and the resident continued to lose weight. This failure resulted in actual harm for Resident #14. This was true for 1 (one) of 2 (two) residents reviewed for the care area of nutrition during the the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: Resident #14. Facility census: 63. Findings include: a) Resident #14 On 07/24/24 at 10:09 AM, a review of Resident #14's medical record was conducted which revealed the following periods of time when the resident suffered a severe weight loss: -- On 03/05/24 Resident #14 weighed 201.2 pounds and one (1) month later the resident weighed 187.2 on 04/03/24. This is a loss of 6.95 percent, which is considered a severe weight loss in one (1) month. -- On 01/06/24 Resident #14 weighed 205.6 pounds and six (6) months later on 07/03/24 the resident weighed 182.6 pound which was a 12.95 percent, which is considered a severe weight loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and resident interview the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity, by passing medications, and doing blood pressures in the dining room in a group setting and by not ensuring Resident Council Meeting was conducted with no interruptions. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Facility Census 71. Findings include: a) Resident council meeting During the Resident Council Meeting on 06/04/25 between 2:30 PM and 3:00 PM, the following staff opened the closed door and entered with residents, or was looking for someone: Registered Nurse (RN) #31 Nursing Assistant (NA) #80 and NA #35 The Resident Council in its entirety said that staff come in all the time while they are doing activities to give them medicine, and check their blood pressure. Resident Council [NAME] President, Resident #19, stated, I don't understand why they can't take us out to do that. During an interview on 06/04/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to ensure resident grievance forms were easily accessible to residents. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Facility Census 71. Findings include: During the Resident Council Meeting on 06/04/25 at 2:40 PM, Resident Council members as a whole said that they did not know where to find a form to file a grievance. An observation on 06/04/25 at 3:20 PM, of the front lobby area and the nurses station revealed no grievance forms were out and accessible to residents. During an interview on 06/04/25 at 3:25 PM, The Licensed Social Worker (LSW) stated, We keep them in a box behind the nurses station. The LSW confirmed, the grievance forms were not accessible to residents. .
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and equipment manual review the facility failed to keep the ice machine in safe operating condition. This has the ability to affect all Residents that get their nutrition from the kitchen, also residents that attend food related activities. Facility Census: 71. Findings Included: a) Ice Machines On 06/05/25 at 9:40 am the tour with the Maintenance Director found the ice machines located in the Kitchen area had a drain pipe running on the floor to a drain and the nutrition room on had no required air gap on the ice machine drains. The drain pipes were touching the drains. On 06/05/25 throughout the tour, the Maintenance Director confirmed the drain pipes / tubing should not be down in the drain or touching the drain. He states that he would get them fixed.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon record review and staff interview, the Facility failed to ensure the PASRR Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was current and coordinated with the MDS. This was true for one (1) resident of five (5) reviewed during the annual survey process. Resident identifier: #2. Facility census: 71. Findings included: a) Resident #2 Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #2 had a diagnosis of major depressive disorder dated 03/30/16. The resident received medications for depression. There were physician orders for: Quetiapine Fumarate Oral Tablet 100 MG (Quetiapine Fumarate) (Seroquel) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for Episodes of mania and depression r/t Bipolar Sertraline HCl Oral Tablet 100 MG (Sertraline HCl) (Zoloft) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for Depression Pharmacy Active 1/23/2 . The PASRR was completed by facility on 12/26/16. Major depression was not listed on the PASARR. The resident had the diagnosis prior to the PASARR being completed. This was reviewed with the DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to collaborate with Hospices services. This was true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for hospice services. Resident identifier #30. Facility Census: 71. Findings Included: a) Resident #30 A medical record review revealed Resident #30 was receiving Hospice Services starting on 03/31/25. A continued record review of physician's orders showed an order: --Order Summary: Resident is on hospice care related to: End of life care due to advanced dementia. Review of Resident # 30's Hospice documentation showed it did not contain an active care plan or collaborating documentation from Hospice Services. During an interview with the Director of Nursing #30 on 06/05/25 at 1:13 PM, she verified that Resident #30 was receiving Hospice Services and had no current coordinated plan of care with the Hospice on her medical record with the provider responsible for performing each or any specific…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview and observation the facility failed to ensure the environment in which it had control of, was free from accidents and hazards. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to effect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier #40. Facility census 71. Findings include: a) Resident #40's room An observation on 06/03/25 at 11:25 AM, revealed a gallon jug of Ecolab Lime-A-way underneath Resident #40's sink. The sink did not have an enclosure. During an observation with the Administrator on 06/03/25 at 11:35 AM, The Administration confirmed that the jug of Ecolab Lime-A-way was under the sink and should not be there. The Administrator then stated, I can only assume that the sink was stopped up and they accidently left it in here. I will have maintenance do a house wide sweep to make sure there is nothing else. b) Resident #40 A record review on 06/03/25 at 12:30 PM, revealed that Resident #40 has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's. Further record review revealed a care plan focus that reads as follows:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Observation, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to honor residents drink preferences. This has the potential to affect a more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers #32 and #40. Facility census: 71. Findings included: a) Resident preferences During an observation and interview of dining services on 06/02/25 at 12:45 pm Resident #32 had consumed his coffee and asked this Surveyor if he could have another cup. During an interview with the Activities Assistant (AA) 06/02/25 at 11:46 AM he stated that he was out of coffee and Resident #32 would have to wait until the coffee cart came out in about 15 minutes or so. Continued observation found Resident #32 table mate trying to pour her coffee in his cup. Subsequent observation at 12:05 PM of Resident #40 ask (AA) if he could have a second cup of coffee. AA stated he would have to wait until the drink cart came out. An observation at 12:25 PM found that Residents #32 and #40 had still not received a second cup of coffee. At this time, I ask the Dietary Manager if the residents could have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure it had a complete and accurate medical record. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (5) five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers #48, and #61. Facility census 71. Findings Include: a) Resident #48 A record review on 06/05/25 at 11:55 AM, of Resident #48's orders, revealed an order for Trazodone oral tablet 50 Milligrams (MG) to give (1) one tablet by mouth one time a day for Depression. Further record review of Resident #48's active diagnosis, revealed that Depression was not listed as a diagnosis. During an interview on 06/05/25 at 1:11 PM, Registered Nurse Unit Manager, (UM) stated, It's on the order, but I could not find it in the diagnosis. She confirmed that the diagnosis of Depression was not there as indicated for the Trazodone medication. B) Resident #61 A review of Resident #61's medical record found a physician order for a dysphagia advanced diet. There was a Speech and Language Pathologist evaluation completed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment related to a hole in the dining room counter top that would allow garbage into a storage cabinet. Facility census 71. Findings include: a) On 06/02/25 at approximately 12:00 p.m., this surveyor observed a hole in the counter top located in the back of the dining room. Observed in the counter top hole into the cabinet below what appeared to be a a used plastic utensil and opened salt and pepper paper packets located in the hole. b) Interview with the facility's Guest Services director on 06/02/25 at12:10 p.m. verified the finding. The finding was also acknowledged by the facility administrator on 06/02/25 at 12:15 p.m and upon exit on 06/05/25 at approximately 3:00 p.m.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-25 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was modified to make it facility centered to identify the staff competencies required to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the long term care survey process and had the ability to affect more than a limited number of residents. Identifier: Facility Assessment Tool. Census: 63. Findings included: a) Facility Assessment Tool On 07/24/24 at 10:55 AM during a review of the nursing competency requirements in the facility assessment it is identified that the facility assessment document provided is titled a Facility Assessment Tool. This document update was dated 12/28/23. The Requirement noted for this tool is (typed as written) Nursing facilities will conduct, document, and annually review a facility-wide assessment, which includes both their resident population and the resources the facility needs to care for their residents. It further stated that the requirement for the facility assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity. Resident #24 was provided care by a male Nurse Aide when it was known she preferred a female Nurse Aide to provide her care. In addition a Nurse Aide took photographs of Resident #63, #65, #24, #36, and #28 to prove they were in need of incontinence care before providing the needed care. This failed practice was true for five (5) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of dignity during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifiers: #63, #65, #24, #36 and #28. Facility Census: 63. Findings Include: a) Resident #24 During an interview on 07/22/24 at 1:29 PM Resident #24 stated, I don't think they can read to good here. When she was asked to elaborate the resident stated, They know I only want a female nurse aide. It is written down somewhere, but a few days not too long ago I had a male nurse side. He is a good aide and he took good care of me, but I did not like it because he was a man. A review of the residents care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on resident interview, staff interview, and record review the facility to ensure residents were free from mental abuse and additionally failed to identify what happened to the residents as Mental Abuse when the investigation was complete. Nurse Aide #160 took photos of Resident #63, #65, #24, #36, and #28 which to a reasonable person would cause the resident to suffer humiliation, shame and/or degradation. This was true for Five (5) of eight (8) residents reviewed for the care area of Abuse during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifiers: #63, #65, #24, #36 and #28. Facility Census: 63. Findings include: a) Nurse Aide (NA) #160 A review of the facility's reportable incidents found on 05/13/24 the facility reported five (5) separate reportable incidents related to the same nurse aide. A review of each reportable found they all contained the following allegation, Nurse aide took photos of resident to prove incontinence care was needed. Photos of resident's did not include their face; however…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to implement their policy titled: Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation. The faicliity failed to report all allegations of abuse related to Resident #12. Also for Resident #63, #65, #24, #36 and #28 the facility failed to identify the actions of Nurse Aide #160 as mental abuse when she took pictures of the residents in their briefs. This failed practice was true for six (6) of eight (8) residents reviewed for the care area of abuse during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifiers: #12. #63, #65, #24, #36, and #28. Facility Census: 63. a) Resident #12 On 07/24/24 at 1:28 PM the Director of Rehab (DOR) was interviewed in regards to a complaint investigation in which it was alleged Physical Therapist (PT) #102 was documenting and billing for therapy services which the residents never received. When asked if anyone had ever brought to her attention that PT #102 may be billing and documenting therapy services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to report all allegations of abuse and/or neglect to the appropriate agencies as required by regulation. Resident Identifiers: #12 and #5. Facility Census: 63 Findings included: a) Resident #12 On 07/24/24 at 1:28 PM the Director of Rehab (DOR) was interviewed in regards to a complaint investigation in which it was alleged Physical Therapist (PT) #102 was documenting and billing for therapy services which the residents never received. When asked if anyone had ever brought to her attention that PT #102 may be billing and documenting therapy services which the residents never received she stated, Yes Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA) #98 had reported this to her. She stated, she called her corporate office and they advised her to take the social worker and go talk to all the residents currently receiving therapy. During an interview with Social Worker #75 on 07/24/24 at 2:18 PM, Social Worker #75 stated, PTA #98 came into her office and reported that Resident #12 stated she did not receive her therapy yesterday. (She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident representative of the bedhold policy when Resident #23 was transferred from the facility on three (3) occasions. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalizations during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #23. Facility census: 63. Findings Include: a) Resident #23 A review of Resident #23's medical record on 07/23/24 found the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE], 05/31/24, and 07/12/24. The facility was asked to provide the bedhold policy notification for the three (3) discharges. They provided a bed hold policy for Resident #23 for each of the dates listed, however the bed hold policies were not signed by the resident and/or their representative. There was also no notes indicating the facility had verbally spoke with the resident and/or representative about the bed hold policy to see if they wanted to pay the bed hold fee. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to implement physicians orders, failed to follow their weight policy for reweighs and failed to identify a significant weight gain. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of nutrition during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #40 Facility Census: 63 Findings Include: a) Physician orders On 07/23/24 at 1:02 PM a review of Resident #40's medical record found a 17.6 pound weight gain from 07/09/24 until 07/16/24. According to the diagnosis sheet for this resident which was provided by the facility, Resident #40 had an active diagnosis of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF). According to further record review of the last six (6) months, the following weeks had no weight documented for this resident. 01/23/24, 04/16/24, 04/30/24 and 06/25/24. The facility failed to follow the active physicians order for: Weekly weights every Tuesday every day shift for Congestive Heart Failure. This was confirmed with the Director of Nursing on 07/23/24 at 1:30 PM who agreed with the missed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Nurse Aides (NA's) completed all required competencies. This was true for five (5) of five (5) NA competencies reviewed during the long term care survey process. Identifier: NA #9, NA #20, NA #28, NA #40 and NA #53 Census: 63. Findings included: On 07/23/24 at approximately 7:30 PM during a review of the completed competencies provided for NA #09, NA #20, NA #28, NA #40 and NA #53 the following competencies was identified. a) NA #09 - Date of Hire - 04/18/24 * NA safe O2 (oxygen) handling competency * Competency Validation Total Lift * Competency Validation Invacare Sit to Stand Lift b) NA #20 - Date of Hire - 12/16/21 * NA safe O2 (oxygen) handling competency c) NA #28 - Date of Hire - 09/22/09 * NA safe O2 (oxygen) handling competency * Competency Validation Total Lift * Competency Validation Invacare Sit to Stand Lift d) NA #40 - Date of Hire - 04/18/24 * NA safe O2 (oxygen) handling competency * Competency Validation Total Lift * Competency Validation Invacare Sit to Stand Lift e) NA #53 - Date of Hire -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the failed to ensure appropriate environmental controls for safe medication storage by not obtaining the temperature in the Medication Refrigerator and maintaining these temperatures on the temperature log on a daily basis. This discovery was made during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Facility census: 63. Findings include: a) Facility On 07/23/24 at approximately 2:30 PM, a observation was made of the facility medication storage room. At this time a log was noted for the medication refrigerator titled, Temperature Log for Refrigerator and Freezer which was dated July 2024. Upon reviewing this log, it revealed several areas without the required information documented. These areas were as follows: Staff Initials for dates 07/04/24 dayshift, 07/05/24 dayshift and 07/19/24 dayshift. Room temperature for dates 07/04/24 dayshift, 07/05/24 dayshift and 07/19/24 dayshift. Exact time for dates 07/04/24 dayshift, 07/05/24 dayshift and 07/19/24 dayshift. Furthermore, the instructions on this log states temperatures are to be checked in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, staff interview and the facility policy for Safe Handling for Foods from Visitors, the facility failed to ensure the freezers in the resident rooms was being monitored for temperatures daily. This was true for three (3) of three (3) refrigerators/freezers observed during the long term care survey process. Identifiers: Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]B, Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]B and Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]B. Census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]B, Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]B and Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]B During a tour of the facility, Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]B, Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]B and Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]B all were observed and had refrigerators with freezers. Temperatures were noted to only be documented for the refrigerator and not for the freezer. During a review of the facility policy for Safe Handling for Foods from Visitors it is identiifed on page one (1) under number five (5) stated the refrigerators/freezers will be properly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record Review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the residents medical record was complete and accurate. This was true for one (1) of 25 residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #10. Facility Census: 63. Findings Include: a) Resident #10 A review of Resident #10's medical record on 07/23/24, found an order for Hydrocodone five (5) milligram - 325 milligrams as needed every 24 hours. A review of the controlled substance log and medication administration record (MAR) since April 2024 through current found on through current found on the following days the Hydrocodone was signed out on the Controlled Substance log but was not documented as administered on the MAR: 04/24/24 04/30/24 05/09/24 05/13/24 and 05/21/24. An interview with the Director of Nursing on 07/23/24 at 11:55 AM confirmed the above findings.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to develop and implements an ongoing infection prevention and control program (PCP) to prevent, recognize, and control the onset and spread of infection. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: Resident #270 and #5. Facility census: 63. Findings include: a) Facility On 07/23/24 at 07:55 AM, a medication administration observation was made with RN #41. At this time, RN #41 entered Resident #270's room to administer medication and obtain a blood glucose reading using the glucometer from the medication administration cart. Upon entering Resident #270's room, RN #41 was observed to lay the glucometer on Resident #270's bed with no barrier. RN #41 then performed the blood glucose test on Resident #270. RN #41 then carried the glucometer out into the hallway and was observed to wipe the glucometer off with an alcohol prep pad and lay the glucometer on the medication cart, RN #41 was then was observed to place the glucometer into the top drawer of the medication cart. This Surveyor then asked RN #41,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all Nursing Assistants (NA's)received the required minimum of 12 hours of nurse aide training per year. This was true for one (1) of five (5) NA's reviewed during the long term care survey process. Identifier: NA #28. Census: 63. Findings include: a) NA #28 - Hire date - 09/22/09 On 07/23/24 at approximately 7:15 PM during a review of the 12 hours of nurse aid training, the NA training reviewed from 05/01/23 to current identified the following nurse aide training hours completed: *11/22/23 - Abuse Neglect and Exploitation - .75 hours * 07/07/24 - Catheter and Perineal Care - .25 hours In reviewing the required minimum of 12 hours of nurse aid training per year, and NA #28's one (1) hour of completed training with the Administrator on 07/24/25 at approximately 11:45 AM. The Administrator agreed NA #28 had not completed the required minimum of 12 hours of nurse aid training per year.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident and or representative was informed in advance by the physician, other practitioner or health professional of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative option preferred prior to the administration of an psychotropic medication. This was true for 1 (one) of 5 (five) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #5. Facility census: 63. Findings include: a) Resident #5 On 07/24/24 at approximately 2:24 PM, a review of Resident #5's medical record was performed which revealed Resident #5 was receiving 2 (two) antipsychotic's and 1 (one) antidepressant. The physicians orders were as follows: * Quetiapine Fumarate (Seroquel) 25 mg 1 (one) tablet by mouth at bedtime for dementia with behavioral disturbance. * Nuplazid 34 mg 1 (one) capsule by mouth one time a day for Parkinson's with psychosis as evidenced by delusions/hallucination. * Fluoxetine (Prozac) 20 mg 1 (one)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant weight loss for Resident #14. This was true for 1 (one) of 2 (two) residents reviewed for the care area of nutrition during the Long Term Care Survey Process.Resident identifier: Resident #14.n Facility census: 63. Findings include: a) Resident #14 On 07/24/24 at 10:09 AM, a review of Resident #14's medical record was conducted which revealed on 02/02/24, Resident #14 weighed 203.2 lbs. On 07/09/24, Resident #14 weighed 178.2 pounds which is a -12.30 % loss. Further review of Resident #14's medical record revealed no evidence te residents attending physcian had been notified of the residents weight loss. On 7/24/24 at approximately 2:30 PM, a review of Policy and Procedure titled, Weight Monitoring revealed that the physician should be informed of a significant change in weight. On 07/24/24 at 3:38 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON acknowledged that per facility policy and procedure Resident #14's physician should have been notified of the weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify the ombudsman when Resident #23 was transferred to the hospital. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalization during the Long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #23. Facility Census: 63. a) Resident #23 A review of Resident #23's medical record on 07/23/24 found the residents was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. An interview with Social Worker #75 on 07/25/24 at 9:45 AM found the resident did not print on the discharge list because he was on behold during this hospital stay. She confirmed the ombudsman was not notified of this transfer because he did not print on the discharge list for March 2024 and that is the list she faxes to the ombudsman monthly.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate [NAME] Virginia Pre-admission Screening (PASR) to include all diagnosis with a new condition. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents whose PASR's were reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier #1 and #20. Facility Census: 63 Findings included: a) Resident #1 During a medical record review of Resident #1 on 07/22/24 at 3:09 PM it was identified the most recent PASR was completed on 08/02/21 and this PASR did include a level II completion. A further review of this PASR found the PASR did not identify Resident #1's diagnosis of major depression disorder dated 07/01/21 and Resident #1 diagnosis of psychotic disorder with delusions dated 10/20/21 as Resident #1's current conditions at the time the PASR was completed. During an interview on 07/23/24 at approximately 9:15 AM with Registered Nurse Clinical Reimbursement Coordinator (RN CRC) #16, she stated, the diagnosis should have been added to the PASR and it would be resubmitted now. b) Resident #20 On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure an accurate comprehensive care plan was developed for Resident #37 in the area of dental and for Resident #64 in the area of pressure ulcers. This was true for two (2) of 25 sampled residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifiers: #37 and #64. Facility Census: 63. Findings Include: a) Resident #37 An observation of Resident #37 on 07/22/24 at 1:28 PM found the resident had metal pieces visible in lower gum line. On 07/24/24 at 2:45 PM the Director of Nursing was asked to look into the residents mouth to determine what the metal which was visible was. Upon the completion of the observation it was discovered the resident had a partial plate on the bottom and the metal was visible because she had no natural teeth left to hook it to. The Director of nursing was asked if she had any natural teeth in her mouth and she stated there was not any. A review of Resident #37's medical record found a care plan related to her dental status which read: Resident is at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update a care plan in regards to a diagnosis of psychosis r/t (related to) dementia. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, psychotropic medications, and medication regimen review during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #1. Facility Census: 63. Findings include: a) Resident #1 During a medical record review on 07/23/24 at 11:35 AM, Resident #1 was identified to have a physician diagnosis of Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, without mention of fluctuations, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere moderate with agitation and a diagnosis of psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition. It is further identified the resident receives seroquel which is ordered for Resident #1's psychosis r/t (related to) dementia with the pharmacy reference to the diagnosis of the dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, moderate with agitation and psychotic disorder with delusions due to know physiological…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to take appropriate measures when they had knowledge a resident's court appointed guardian was no longer able to serve as the guardian because they had lost decision making capacity for themselves while a resident at the same facility as Resident #68. Resident Identifiers: #68 and #372. Facility Census: 63. Findings include: A review of records on 07/23/24 at 10:24 AM of care plan note dated for 5/23/2024 at 4:18 PM revealed the following: Resident's niece requested to meet to discuss palliative care and hospice options. Nursing discussed resident has been declining and is not eating, drinking, etc. Her niece indicated she is agreeable to making resident palliative care and asked for a referral to hospice. She stated her biggest concern is resident be kept comfortable and pain managed. She noted she currently appears comfortable and does not appear to be in pain. No concerns or complaints voiced. Interview with Social Worker #77 on 7/23/24 at 3:10 PM in regards to why resident's niece was in attendance to meeting and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident had monthly drug regimen reviews. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, psychotropic medications, and Medication Regimen Review (MRR) during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #1. Facility Census: 63. Findings include: a) Resident #1 During a medical record review on 07/23/24 at 11:35 AM a review of the past 12 months of MRR's identified the month of 10/01/23 did not have an MRR on file for Resident #1. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 07/23/24 3:30 PM the DON stated the MRR for October had not addressed by the physician during the month of October so the pharmacy had made recommendation again 11/29/23. She further stated this November MRR order was not entered until 12/04/23. The DON stated she did not know what had happened to the MRR for October.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. During the kitchen tour it was discovered a dietary aide was not wearing a beard guard, a dirty drip pan and dirty dish racks. Also, no temperatures were taken for resident's personal refrigerators. This had the potential to affect any resident receiving nourishment from the kitchen or from personal refrigerators. Facility census: 67. Findings included: a) Kitchen tour During the kitchen tour on 02/13/23 at 10:07 AM, it was discovered Dietary Aide (DA) #123 was not wearing a beard guard. The drip pan for the gas stove had a great amount of grease buildup, and food debris was found on the storage dish racks. An interview with the Dietary Director #126 on 02/13/23 at 10:30 AM, verified DA #123 needed a beard guard and the drip pan had a grease buildup, and the dish racks needed to be cleaned. b) Resident refrigerators During a random opportunity for discovery on 02/13/23 at 1:10 PM, it was discovered Residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-15 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman of a facility-initiated transfer for Resident #71. This failed practice was true for one (1) on one (1) Residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Resident identifier: #71. Facility census: 67. Findings included: a) Record review A review of Resident #71's medical record found a transfer form dated 12/02/22 which stated: Resident went unresponsive at dialysis this afternoon. Received one liter of IV fluids while at dialysis. Resident alert, not talking. Family with resident requesting resident Resident to go to emergency room (ER) for evaluation. Resident was transferred to hospital at 8:40 PM. Record review indicated the Resident never returned to the facility from the hospital, and was discharged from the facility on 12/06/22 with return not anticipated. Record review showed no documentation to indicate the ombudsman was notified of Resident #71's transfer to the hospital. b) Staff Interview During an interview on 02/15/23 at 1:28 PM, Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #86 stated they only send planned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Residents on transmission-based precautions did not have signage at their doors to indicate the type of transmission based precautions to be observed and the personal protective equipment required. These were random opportunities for discovery that had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #21, #59. Facility census: 67. Findings included: a) Resident #21 On 02/13/23 at 11:30 AM, this surveyor entered Resident #21's room to interview the resident. The resident had no signage on the door to indicate the resident had transmission-based precautions. Subsequent review of Resident #21's medical records showed the resident had enhanced barrier precautions due to the presence of a feeding tube. During an interview on 02/13/23 at 12:27 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #43 confirmed Resident #21 had enhanced barrier precautions but did not have signage to indicate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-15 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on employee record reviews and staff interview the facility failed to provide the 12 hour training in-services required annually for nurse aides (NA). This was true for two (2) of five (5) employee training records reviewed for staffing during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Employee Identifiers: NA #4 and #40. Facility census: 67. Findings included: a) Annual 12 hour training. During a review of employee records on 02/14/23, it was discovered the required annual 12 hour in-services training for NA #4 and #40 were incomplete. NA #4 and #40 were three (3) to four (4) hours short of meeting the requirement. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on 02/15/23 at 12:38 PM, verified NA #4 and #40 annual 12 hours of required training was incomplete. .
- No harm found · C2025-06-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to post menu timely and adequately. This has the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Facility census: 71. Findings included: a) Menu Posting During an observation of the dining process on 06/02/25 at 11:35 AM, found the posted menu fried chicken, green beans, and potato wedges. During an interview with Resident #51 on 06/02/25 at 11:38 AM she stated, they never get what is on the menu. An observation of Activities assistant going around the dining room with a copy of the posted menu informing the residents in the dining room they were having fried chicken, green beans, and potato wedges. An observation at 06/02/25 at 12:35 PM of the meal served was chicken, potato wedges and okra. During an interview on 06/02/25 at about 12:50 PM the Dietary Manager stated that she never noticed the mistake on the posted menu. When asked how she notifies residents of changes to the menu, she stated that she tells the staff that ask. During an observation on 06/03/25 at about 8:40 AM found no breakfast…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-07-25 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse staff posting was accurate in the area of the number of staff with two (2) of eight (8) nursing staff postings reviewed and there were no total hours worked for the staff on eight (8) of eight (8) nurse staff postings reviewed. Census: 63 Findings include: a) Accurate data- Number of staff On 07/24/24 at 10:00 AM, during a review of the facilities Daily Staffing Posting forms, 07/06/23 and 04/21/24 forms it is identified the Registered Nurses (RN) listed is a total for three (3) for each day for the day shift RN staff. On 07/24/24 at approximately 10:12 AM during an interview with the Schedule Manager (SM) #80 she stated the Nurse Practice Educator/Infection Preventions (NPE/IP) hours was included in the RN's listed for both days (07/06/23 and 04/1/24). In reviewing the determination of direct care classifications for the staffing posting forms for the RN hours to be listed, a review was completed of the The Labor Classification/ Job Title section of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$16,039 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $16,039 — penalty dated 2024-07-25
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 84 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 84; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC WV OPCOS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/01/2021 |
| PC WTA OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2021 |
| SMS 2021 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2021 |
| STEIN, SHALOM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/30/2021 |
| BOWDEN, ROY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| COX, VICKIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| MANSFIELD, MELISSA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| SILVERBERG, NISANEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| TRIANA, JOSEPH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| AURORA GUARDIAN HOLDCO II CO-BORROWER, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/30/2021 |
| AURORA GUARDIAN HOLDCO II MEZZ BORROWER, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/30/2021 |
| AURORA GUARDIAN HOLDCO II, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/30/2021 |
| AURORA GUARDIAN II REALTY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/30/2021 |
| AURORA GUARDIAN PARTNERS II LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/30/2021 |
| J & R FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/30/2021 |
| L FRIEDMAN 2018 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/30/2021 |
| L FRIEDMAN FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/30/2021 |
| LANDAU FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/30/2021 |
| M FRIEDMAN 2018 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/30/2021 |
| OAK RIDGE REALTY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/30/2021 |
| PC WTA ACQUISITION LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| PC WTA MULTI-STATE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| PEACE CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| R&J FAMILY INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/30/2021 |
| PHILLIPS, JOANNA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/08/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
19 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $582K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515174. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.