Complete Care At Milford Manor LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 138 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 106 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.97 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.19 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure methadone (an opioid pain medication) was ordered in a timely manner to provide a resident with chronic pain their methadone for three days (03/01/25 through 03/03/25) which caused the resident to miss six doses of the pain medication that resulted in the resident experiencing withdrawal symptoms including; mental pain and physical pain all over their body. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 38 residents reviewed for pain (Resident #1), and was evidenced by the following: On 03/03/25 at 11:19 AM, Resident #1 was observed awake in bed and stated they did not feel well enough to talk, but wanted to talk later. On 03/03/25 at 1:26 PM, Resident #1 was observed awake in bed and stated that they wanted to talk tomorrow, but they were still not feeling well enough to talk at that time because they were recuperating from the weekend. On 03/04/25 at 11:43 AM, Resident #1 was observed in their room sitting in a chair, dressed in a night gown. Resident #1 stated they were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ187267 Based on observation, interviews, review of medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 6/24/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to follow a Physician's order for a Stat (immediate ) x-ray. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #2), as evidenced by the following: A review of the medical record according to the admission sheet, Resident #2 was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 4/14/25 (Comprehensive), Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment and needed supervision or touching assistance with eating. A review of Resident #2's Order Summary Report (OSR) with a print date of 6/23/25, received from the Licensed Nursing Home administrator (LNHA), revealed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to plan menus for two of 46 residents (Resident (R #1 and R #80) reviewed for menus and for puree and mechanical soft diets. This deficient practice could cause residents to choke on food and/or lose weight. Findings include: A facility policy for menus was requested and not provided. Review of the facility policy titled Food: Quality and palatability, dated 02/02/03, provided by the facility revealed 1. The Dining Services Director and Cook(s) are responsible for food preparation. Menu items are prepared according to the menu, production guidelines, and standardized recipes. Review of the facility's 2024-25 Fall/Winter North Week 1 menu extensions for the week of 03/02/25 through 03/08/25 provided by the facility, revealed diets were planned only regular, NAS [no added salt], CCD [carbohydrate-controlled diet], Renal, and Veg [vegetarian] diet. Review of the facility's diet roster, dated 03/06/25, revealed 35 residents were prescribed a mechanical soft diet and 11 residents were prescribed a pureed diet. 1.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had accurate vaccine records and were current with their pneumococcal vaccines for five of five residents (Resident #1, #7, #39, #45, and #91 reviewed for pneumonia vaccinations out of a total sample of 38 residents. This practice had the potential to increase the risk for these residents to contract pneumonia. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pneumococcal vaccine (Series), dated 09/01/24 and reviewed 05/09/24 revealed, . It is our policy to offer residents and staff immunization against pneumococcal disease in accordance with current CDC guidelines and recommendations. 1. Each resident will be assessed for pneumococcal immunization upon admission. Self-report of immunization shall be accepted. Any additional efforts to obtain information shall be documented, including efforts to determine date of immunization or type of vaccine received . The type of pneumococcal vaccine (PCV15, PCV20,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — pattern
  Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, personnel files review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure four of five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA #7, #18, #19, and #14) whose personnel files were reviewed received training on the facility's infection control program, including standards, policies, and procedures of the program. This had the potential to affect all 107 residents in the facility related to Infection Control. Findings include: 1. Review of CNA18's personnel files revealed CNA 18 had a date of hire (DOH) 05/23/22. Review of CNA18's personnel file revealed she had not received Infection Control training since her hire date at the facility. 2. Review of CNA19's personnel files revealed CNA 19 had a DOH of 11/27/23. Review of CNA 19's personnel file revealed she had not received Infection Control training since his hire date at the facility. 3. Review of CNA14's personnel files revealed CNA 14 had a DOH of 05/23/22. Review of CNA14's personnel file revealed she had not received Infection Control training since her hire date at the facility. 4. Review of CNA7's personnel files…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0946 — pattern
  Provide training in compliance and ethics.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, personnel files review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure five of five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA #7, #18, #19, #12, and #14) received education related to the facility's Compliance and Ethics program. This had the potential to affect 107 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: Review of the undated, Certified Nursing Assistant Job Description, revealed . Compliance as a condition of employment and performance appraisal. Agreement to abide by all standards, policies and procedures of the facility, including the facility's compliance and ethics program, is a condition of employment . 1. Review of CNA 18's personnel files revealed CNA 18 had a date of hire (DOH) 05/23/22. Review of CNA18's personnel file revealed she had not received Compliance and Ethics training since her hire date at the facility. 2. Review of CNA19's personnel files revealed CNA 19 had a DOH of 11/27/23. Review of CNA 19's personnel file revealed she had not received Compliance and Ethics training since his hire date at the facility. 3. Review of CNA12's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
  Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, personnel files review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure five of five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA #7, #18, #19, #12, and #14) received mandatory Behavior Health training. This had the potential to impact all 107 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of CNA18's personnel files revealed CNA 18 had a date of hire (DOH) 05/23/22. Review of CNA18's personnel file revealed she had not received Behavior Health training since her hire date at the facility. 2. Review of CNA19's personnel files revealed CNA 19 had a DOH of 11/27/23. Review of CNA 19's personnel file revealed she had not received Behavior Health training since his hire date at the facility. 3. Review of CNA12's personnel files revealed CNA 12 had a DOH of 05/23/22. Review of CNA12's personnel file revealed she had not received Behavior Health training since her hire date at the facility. 4. Review of CNA14's personnel files revealed CNA 14 had a DOH of 05/23/22. Review of CNA14's personnel file revealed she had not received Behavior Health training since her hire date at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to: 1.) notify the physician of a hypoglycemic event that required medication intervention for one of one resident (Resident (R) 40) reviewed for diabetic management out of a total sample of 38. This placed R40 at risk of harm related to hypoglycemia; and 2.) notify the Responsible Party (RP) of an alteration in treatment for one of one (Resident (R) 76) reviewed for notification out of a total sample of 38. R76 was started on a prophylactic regime of Tamiflu without the RP's notification. This prevented the RP from having input into R76's treatment. Findings include: 1. Review of R40's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), indicated R40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus. Review of R40's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the EMR under the MDS tab and with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/18/25, revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to privacy during care for one of 38 sampled residents (Resident (R) 8). This failure had the potential to have a negative impact on the residents' psychosocial well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's Statement of Residents Rights, located in the admission packet, revealed, Right to Privacy: Each resident shall have the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal care and clinical records . The facility's foremost concern is to achieve and to maintain the optimum level of independence and dignity of our residents while, at the same time, providing a safe and secure environment . During an observation on 03/05/25 at 5:23 AM, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA)4 was performing personal care for R8. The door of the resident's room was ajar, and the resident's privacy curtain was not drawn. R8 was visible from the hallway and was fully undressed. Review of 8's quarterly Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions were consistently implemented and weekly skin assessments were completed for one (Resident (R)37) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers out of a total sample of 38 residents. This failure increased the risk of existing pressure ulcers worsening and/or the development of new pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Pressure Ulcer Management, dated 01/24, revealed c. Licensed nurses will conduct a full body skin assessment on all residents upon admission/readmission, weekly, and after any newly identified pressure injury. Findings will be documented in the medical record . c. Evidence-based interventions for prevention will be implemented for all residents who are assessed at risk or who have a pressure injury present. Basic or routine care interventions could include, but are not limited to: i. Redistribute pressure (such as repositioning,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent weight loss for two of five residents (Resident (R) 85 and R80) reviewed for nutrition out of a total sample of 38. This had the potential to cause harm to R85 and R80 related to unaddressed weight loss. Findings include: Review of a policy provided by the facility titled Weight Policy, dated December 2024, indicated Based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable god weight range . If nutritional goals are not achieved, care planned interventions will be reevaluated for effectiveness and modified as appropriate. 1. Review of R80's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/16/25 and located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the MDS tab, revealed an admission date of 11/10/24 and a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$3,595 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $3,595 — penalty dated 2025-03-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ