No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Complete Care at Brick LLC

415 Jack Martin Blvd, Brick, NJ 08724 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 137 certified beds · (732) 206-8000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (732) 206-8000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
222 Jack Martin Blvd · (732) 840-4666 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1659 State Highway 88 · (848) 241-3129 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ALDI0.4 mi
Jack Martin · (833) 460-7069 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1890 Route 88 · (732) 955-8288 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.1%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.6%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms22.7%12.1%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.9%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.6%18.8%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.5%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.4%15.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.8%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine33.8%80.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission36.7%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.3%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.152.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.141.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 482 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 107 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.0%CMS range 55.3–64.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 8.5–12.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.2%CMS range 6.5–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.54
RN hours/ resident / day
0.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.54
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
71.9%
Total nursing turnover
94.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 137 beds and averages 87.0 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-12)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity during dining for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident (R)85) when staff stood while feeding the resident. This failure could cause humiliation, loss of self-worth, and increase the risk of choking and/or aspirating food or liquid into the lungs.Findings include: Review of R85's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, located under the MDS tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) and with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/04/25, revealed R85 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included non-Alzheimer's dementia; gastritis, unspecified, without bleeding; and depression. It was recorded R85 scored five out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. It was recorded R85 received a mechanically altered diet. Review of R85's Care Plan, revised 08/31/23 and located in the EMR under the Care Plan tab, revealed, [R85]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure the code status was updated in the electronic medical record (EMR) to match the code status ordered for one of 26 sample residents (Resident (R) 78) reviewed for code status. The deficient practice could result in a resident who did not want to be resuscitated receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Findings include: Review of R78's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the EMR, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a fracture of the left femur. Review of R78's Care Plan, located under the Care Plan tab of the EMR and dated [DATE], revealed the resident's advance directive was a ''Do not resuscitate, No intubation.'' Review of R78's ''Profile'' screen, located under the ''Profile'' tab, and ''Physician's Orders,'' located under the ''Orders'' tab of the EMR, revealed Full code ordered on [DATE]. Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care related to dialysis within 48 hours of admission for one of 26 sample residents (Resident (R) 51) reviewed for baseline care plans. Failure to develop and implement a baseline care plan could place residents at risk for unmet care needs.Findings include: Review of R51's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed the resident was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dependence on renal dialysis and surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system. Review of R51's Physician's Orders, located under the Orders tab of the EMR, revealed an order, dated 08/22/25, for dialysis. Review of R51's five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), located under the MDS tab of the EMR and with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/29/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop person centered comprehensive care plans for out-patient therapy, dialysis, and/or a dialysis catheter for two of four residents (Resident (R)51 and R5) reviewed for care plans out of a total sample of 26. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of life and quality of care. Findings include: 1. Review of R51's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dependence on renal dialysis and surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system. Review of R51's five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), located under the MDS tab of the EMR and with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/29/25, indicated the resident received dialysis on admission and while a resident; and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure regularly scheduled care conferences were conducted and residents were invited to participate in their care plan processes for two of four residents (Residents (R) 68 and R9) reviewed for care planning out of a total sample of 26. The deficient practice had the potential to cause poor health decisions and treatment and decrease resident satisfaction with care. Findings include: 1. Review of R68's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 08/06/25 and located in the MDS tab of the electronic medication record (EMR), revealed an admission date 04/30/22. It was recorded R68 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated R68 was cognitively intact. It was recorded R68 had diagnoses of cancer, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. Review of R68's Care Plan Note, dated 02/12/25 and located in the EMR under the Progress Notes tab, revealed, . Care plan meeting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide care for a dialysis catheter after dialysis was discontinued for one of three residents (Resident (R) 51) reviewed for dialysis and failed to ensure the wound vac settings were correct for one of one resident (R97) reviewed for wound vac of 26 sample residents. The deficient practice has the potential to cause infection or tissue damage.Findings include: 1. Review of R51's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed the resident was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dependence on renal dialysis and surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system. Review of R51's five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), located under the MDS tab of the EMR and with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/29/25, indicated the resident received dialysis on admission and while a resident and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident (R) 6) reviewed for entrapment hazards did not have a large gap between their side rail and mattress. Large gaps between the siderails and the mattress have the potential to entrap the resident which could cause strangulation death or injury. Findings include: Review of R6's Care Plan, dated 08/11/24 and located under the Care Plan tab of the EMR, revealed focuses related to side rail safety. Goals included the resident maintaining independence and mobility using side rails and not incurring injury related to the side rails. Review of R6's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), located under the MDS tab of the EMR and with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/21/25, revealed R6 had degenerative dementia, upper and lower extremity impairments on one side, required moderate help to rolling from side to side and from sitting to standing. It was recorded R6 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to provide a packed meal for dialysis according to the physician order for one of four residents (Resident (R) 100) reviewed for dialysis out of a total sample of 26. Failure to provide a diabetic and renal patient meals could result in a change in blood sugar levels or kidney function.Findings include: Review of R100's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type II diabetes mellitus with mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy without macular edema, dependence on renal dialysis, and chronic kidney disease. Review of R100's Physician Order, dated 09/03/25 and located under the Orders tab of the EMR, revealed R100 was to receive a packed breakfast to take to dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. Review of the admission care plan, dated 09/05/25 and located under the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to assess the entrapment risk of a new perimeter mattress used to prevent falls for one of three residents (Resident (R)6) reviewed for accident hazards out of a total sample of 26. Failure to assess and determine hazards could lead to injury, entrapment, or death.Findings include: Review of R6's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity without behavior disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, muscle weakness, and delusional disorder. Review of R6's Care Plan, dated 08/11/24 and located under the Care Plan tab of the EMR, revealed focuses related to side rail safety. Goals included the resident maintaining independence and mobility using side rails and not incurring injury related to the side rails. Review of R6's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents (Resident (R) 46) observed for medication administration was free from significant medication errors when R46 did not receive the correct ordered dosage of Gleevec (a chemotherapy, cancer treatment medication) of 26 sample residents. This failure had the potential to cause adverse drug reactions with the lack of effectiveness of the medications in the event of underdosing.Findings include: Review of R46's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic myeloid leukemia having not achieved remission. Review of R46's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), located under the MDS tab of the EMR and with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/01/25 revealed R46 had a diagnosis of cancer. Review of the September 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR), revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint # NJ169666, NJ170088, NJ167481 Based on observation, interview, and review of the medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that incontinence care was provided to dependent residents in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #23, #30 and #12) on 1 of 2 nursing units (Starlight Unit) observed for incontinence care and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F725 1.) On 05/20/24 at 9:17 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) who stated the unit census was 42 residents, six (6) aides and three (3) nurses. On 05/20/24 at 9:23 AM, the surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 who stated that she was assigned to nine (9) residents. CNA #1 further stated that seven of the nine residents that she was assigned to were incontinent and that she still had four incontinent residents left to change. At that time, CNA #1 entered Resident #23's room and requested permission to provide incontinence care to the resident in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ 169584, 169666, 169916, 167481, and 170088 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient nursing staff on a 24-hour basis in accordance with the facility assessment to a.) maintain the required minimum direct care staff-to resident ratios as mandated by the State of New Jersey, b.) provide appropriate incontinence care to dependent residents (Resident #12, #23 and #30), c.) provide residents with scheduled showers (Resident #45), and d.) prevent the increase of falls for (Resident #9, #56, #232, #233, #234, #235, #236, #237, #238, #241 and #242). This deficient practice was identified for 6 of 6 residents and 9 of 9 closed records reviewed, affected all residents on 2 of 2 units, and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F677 1.) Reference: New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) memo, dated 01/28/2021, Compliance with N.J.S.A. (New Jersey Statutes Annotated) 30:13-18, new minimum staffing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of psychoactive medication (mood altering drug) in the absence of targeted behaviors and obtain a psychiatric consult for the use of a psychotropic medication. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for unnecessary medications and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #24 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, depression and unspecified dementia with other behavior disturbances. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment that facilitates care, dated 03/04/24, indicated that Resident #24 was sometimes understood, and ability was limited to making concrete request. The MDS also indicated that the resident responded to simple direct communication however able. The MDS reflected that the resident was taking psychotropic medications and was not exhibiting behaviors. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) label, date, and store potentially hazardous foods appropriately to prevent food borne illness and b.) maintain kitchen equipment in a manner to prevent microbial growth. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 05/15/24 at 09:52 AM, accompanied by the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), the surveyor made the following observations in the kitchen during the initial tour: 1.) The surveyor observed the can opener blade, shaft, and base of the can opener had sticky brown food particles throughout. The surveyor interviewed the Executive Chef (EC) at that time who stated that the can opener was usually cleaned daily, however, was not cleaned yet. 2.) The surveyor observed a large plastic bin of dry rice with scooper left inside the bin. The EC stated that the scooper should not be left inside the bin and removed it. 3.) On a bottom shelf of a preparation table, the surveyor observed a large bin of loose onions, some of the onions were whole…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ169584 Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete by not documenting the completion of medications and treatments for 3 of 22 (Resident #19, #131, and #182) sampled residents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #19 was admitted with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 03/10/24, revealed that Resident #19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #19's Order Summary Report (OSR) with active orders as of 05/01/2024, revealed a physician order dated 03/04/2024 for atorvastin calcium oral tablet give one tablet by mouth at bedtime for HLD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ168787 Based on observation, interview, and review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) follow transmission-based precautions (TBP) to prevent the potential spread of infection by not utilizing personal protectice equipment (PPE) for a resident on contact precautions for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #63) reviewed for TBP, b.) obtain a physician's order to include a resident's transmission-based precautions (TBP) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #182) reviewed for pressure ulcers, c.) maintain a resident's urinary catheter bag off the floor for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #5) reviewed for urinary catheter, and d.) test residents for influenza (flu) in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #2, #8, #231, #239, and #240) reviewed. This deficient practice and was evidenced by the following: 1.) According to the admission Record, Resident #63 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that maintained and promoted dignity by not applying an appropriate device to protect a resident's clothing for 1 of 19 residents (Resident #24) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #24 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, depression and unspecified dementia with other behavior disturbances. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment that facilitates resident care, dated 03/04/24, indicated that Resident #24 was sometimes understood, and ability was limited to making concrete request and that the resident responded to simple direct communication, however able. The MDS also indicated that the resident was dependent with activities of daily living ADLs. On 05/15/24 at 10:56 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #24 sitting up in a wheelchair with a shower blanket (medical linen that provides…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint # NJ168787 Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a change in condition for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #231) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidence by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #231 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where you do not have enough oxygen in the tissues in the body), Alzheimer's Disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). Further review of the admission Record included contact information for the resident's responsible party. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 08/02/23, included the resident's cogntion was moderately impaired. A review of the individualized Care Plan (CP), initiated 05/12/23, included a focus that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to keep a resident's room clean by placing a soiled incontinence brief in a garbage receptacle without a bag liner, leaving used disposable gloves on the floor, and not emptying a closed-lid garbage receptacle with exposed personal protective equipment. The deficient practice effected 2 of 7 residents (Resident #22 & #57) and was evidenced by the following: On 05/20/2024 at 12:09 PM, while visiting Resident #22 in his/her room, the surveyor observed a soiled incontinence brief in the garbage receptacle adjacent to his/her bed. The receptacle did not have a bag liner in it. The surveyor also observed a pair of inside-out disposable gloves on the floor. On 05/21/2024 at 08:42 AM, while outside of the same room, the surveyor observed the closed-lid garbage receptacle overflowing with yellow, disposable, protective gowns. The surveyor also observed a disposable glove and a piece of paper-like product on the floor near Resident #57's bed. On 05/21/2024 at 09:33 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) provide services according to the resident's communication needs documented on the Care Plan (CP) and b.) update the CP to accurately reflect the communication needs for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #24) evaluated for communication. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #24 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses, which included but were not limited to, depression and unspecified dementia with other behavior disturbances. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment that facilitates resident care, dated 03/04/24, indicated that Resident #24 was sometimes understood, and ability was limited to making concrete request. The MDS also indicated that the resident responded to simple direct communication, however able. On 05/15/24 at 10:56 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #24 sitting in his/her wheelchair. The resident's call bell was observed in reach of the resident's right hand. The resident was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint # NJ167481, NJ169584 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure that an air mattress was accurately set according to the resident's weight, and b.) thoroughly investigate a facility acquired pressure ulcer. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #131 and #182) reviewed for pressure ulcers and was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 05/17/24 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #182 lying in bed asleep. The resident had an air mattress which was set to 280 lbs. (pounds). On 05/20/24 at 9:46 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #182 lying in bed asleep and the resident's air mattress was set to 280 lbs. On 05/21/24 at 9:30 AM, the survey observed Resident #182 lying in bed awake and the resident's air mattress was set to 280 lbs. When asked about the air mattress, the resident stated he/she thought the mattress was not set correctly because he/she could feel a dimple in the mattress on his/her backside. The resident further stated that he/she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving enteral feeding received appropriate care and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding, specifically by having the enteral feeding pump running while disconnected resulting in nutritional formula dripping onto the floor, failing to replace the irrigation syringe every twenty-four hours, and failing to clean nutritional formula residue off of the pole supporting the enteral feeding pump. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #22) investigated for tube feeding and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #22 had a diagnosis which included, but was not limited to, Unspecified Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. A review of Resident #22's physician's orders located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed an order for Enteral Feed four times a day for prevention of clogging use 225mL (Milliliters) water for flush. Further, the EMR revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and pertinent record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of the Narcotic Shift Count logs were completed in accordance with facility policy and accurately account for and document the administration of controlled medications. This deficient practice was identified on 2 of 3 medication carts and was evidenced by the following: On 05/16/24 at 11:44 AM, during medication storage observations, the surveyor, in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN #1), observed the controlled substances inventory and count logs for the Seabreeze nursing unit's medication Cart 3. The following was observed: Narcotic Shift Count log for May 2024 was missing a nursing signature for: -05/03/24 11 PM - 7 AM shift going off duty nurse -05/04/24 3 PM - 11 PM shift going off duty nurse -05/06/24 11 PM - 7 AM shift going off duty nurse -05/07/24 11 PM - 7 AM shift coming on duty nurse -05/07/24 7 AM - 3 PM shift going off duty nurse -05/09/24 11 PM - 7 AM shift going off duty nurse At that time, LPN #1 confirmed that there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) properly secure medications during medication administration, and b.) properly secure a resident's home supply medications. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 nurses observed during medication administration, and 1 of 1 resident (Resident #28) reviewed for pain management, and was evidenced by the following: 1.) On [DATE] at 8:34 AM, during medication administration observation, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN #1) prepare to administer medications to Resident #21. After preparing the ordered medications including docusate sodium (a facility stock supply of over-the-counter stool softener), LPN #1 left the bottle of docusate sodium, which contained medication, on top of the locked medication cart in the hallway and proceeded into the resident's room to administer their medications. At 8:38 AM, the LPN returned to the medication cart, at that time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required members were present during the quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program committee meetings. This deficient practice occurred during 3 of the 4 quarterly QAPI meetings reviewed and was evidenced by the following: On 05/21/2024 at 09:40 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) regarding the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process in the facility. The surveyor reviewed the quarterly QAPI meeting sign in sheets in the presence of the LNHA. According to the quarterly sign in sheets provided by the facility, there was no Infection Preventionist (IP) in attendance at the quarterly QAPI meeting that was held on 04/18/2024. When the surveyor reviewed the sign in sheets for the quarterly meetings, the sign in sheets were missing the Director of Nursing (DON) signature indicating that the DON had not been in attendance for two of the four meetings held on 07/26/2023 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ 166617, NJ 166695, NJ 166489, NJ 166505, NJ 166489, NJ 166461 Based on interview, review of staffing sheets, facility assessment, and policy review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to meet resident needs and/or provide care in a timely manner for nine out of 18 sampled residents (R9, R2, R4, R18, R16, R6, R5, R15, and R10). Residents expressed concerns related to staffing not being able to go to the dining room and extended wait times for assistance. Findings include: 1. During an entrance conference on 08/29/23 at 10:30 AM, the Administrator and Interim Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed staffing has been an issue for the facility. They stated the facility used agency for both nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), sometimes the agency would call out one hour before their shift because they can go to another facility and make more money. They stated the facility has been offering sign-on bonuses, flexible hours, overtime and giving extra $200.00 bonuses for working…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ 166617, NJ 166695 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who self-administered medications had a self-administration of medications assessment, a physician's order, and a care plan completed for one of one resident (Resident (R) 5) reviewed for self-administration of medications. Failure to assess and care plan resident for self-administration of medications increases the potential of medication errors for residents. Findings include: During interview on 08/29/23 at 12:12 PM, R5 stated she had been at the facility for about two weeks due to a stroke which left her right side weak. R5 stated last night on the 11-7 shift, she asked about getting a pain pill because she was having pain (seven out of ten) and asked the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) three times to speak with the nurse, who never came. R5 said she was having pain in her chest, and she had to take a nitroglycerine pill twice, which she keeps on her person. R5 stated she wanted the nurse to take her blood pressure. R5 indicated she was a retired nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ 166617, NJ 166695 Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one out of three medication carts were locked on one of two floors. In addition, the facility failed to ensure medication was locked in a secure place when out of nurse's eyesight. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving an inaccurate dosage of medication. Findings include: Upon arriving on the floor on 08/30/23 at 5:23 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 was observed entering the medication room, located behind the nursing station with another staff member. Surveyor then walked down the middle hallway and observed the unnumbered medication cart parked on the left side of the hallway. The cart was unlocked and had a clear plastic cup sitting on top of the medication cart with orange crushed unknown substance inside of the cup. The nurse did not return to the medication cart until five minutes later. LPN2 confirmed the medication cart had been left unattended and unlocked. LPN2 confirmed medication cups should not be left on top of the cart. LPN2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/21/2022 from 9:37 AM to 10:24 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Food Service Director (FSD), observed the following in the kitchen: 1. In the walk-in freezer an opened bag of chicken fingers on a middle shelf had no dates. The FSD stated, They should be labeled with an open and use by date. 2. In the same walk-in freezer on a lower shelf, an opened package of frozen hash browns removed from its original container had no label or dates. On interview the FSD responded, Same thing. Needs an opened and use by date. On an upper shelf a plastic bag contained frozen garlic bread and was removed from its original container. The garlic bread had no label or dates. 3. A Dietary Aide (DA) was observed working in the dish…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to perform adequate handwashing to prevent the spread of infection as well as failed to follow their own Hand Hygiene policy. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) observed during medication administration. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following. On 06/24/22 at 8:19 AM, the surveyor observed the LPN begin medication administration for an unsampled resident. The LPN went to the resident room to obtain a blood pressure (BP) reading. After obtaining the BP reading, the LPN entered the resident's bathroom. At 8:20 AM, the surveyor observed the LPN turn on the faucet, wet her hands, apply soap, create friction outside the stream of water for 11 seconds, rinse her hands, dry her hands, and turn off the faucet. The LPN did not use alcohol-based hand sanitizer. The time was counted on the New Jersey Department Of Health computer clock. The LPN returned to the medication cart and gathered the resident's medications,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 84 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Complete Care At Chestnut Hill LLCPassaic, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care At HagerstownHagerstown, MD 1 of 5Complete Care At Harston Hall LLCFlourtown, PA 1 of 5Complete Care At Kimberly Hall NorthWindsor, CT 1 of 5Complete Care At Laplata LLCLaplata, MD 1 of 5Complete Care At Milford Manor LLCWest Milford, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care At Wayne Hills Rehab & Resp CenterWayne, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care at Care AgeBrookfield, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at KensingtonWaukesha, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at Maple Grove LLCMadison, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at Margate ParkChicago, IL 1 of 5Complete Care at the BoulevardChicago, IL 2 of 5Complete Care At Brakeley ParkPhillipsburg, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Fox HillVernon, CT 2 of 5Complete Care At Harborage LLCNorth Bergen, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Harrington CourtColchester, CT 2 of 5Complete Care At HyattsvilleHyattsville, MD 2 of 5Complete Care At Inglemoor, LLCEnglewood, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Monmouth, LLCLong Branch, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Ocean Grove LLCOcean Grove, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Prospect Heights LLCHackensack, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Regent LLCHackensack, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Christian Home LLCWaupun, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Grande PrairiePleasant Prairie, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Heritage LLCDundalk, MD 2 of 5Complete Care at Linwood, LLCLinwood, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Nazareth LLCStoughton, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Voorhees, LLCVoorhees, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Wall LLCWall, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Fair Lawn EdgePaterson, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Holiday CityToms River, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Lehigh LLCMacungie, PA 3 of 5Complete Care At Oak Ridge LLCCharleston, WV 3 of 5Complete Care At Orange ParkEast Orange, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Phillipsburg, LLCPhillipsburg, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Severna Park LLCSeverna Park, MD 3 of 5Complete Care At Shrewsbury LLCShrewsbury, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Silver Lake LLCDover, DE 3 of 5Complete Care At SpringbrookSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Complete Care at Corsica Hills LLCCentreville, MD

Showing 40 of 84; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PC HMH OPCO HOLDNGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/16/2023
PC HMH HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/16/2023
SMS 2021 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/16/2023
STEIN, SHALOMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2023
HOCH, ROBERTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/16/2023
HILLER, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2023
LOZOWSKI, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2023
MERCADO, WANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2023
SOLARZ, JEFFREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/16/2023
BRICK PROPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2023
BRICK PROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2023
EEF CAPITAL LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2023
PC HMH PROPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2023
PC HMH PROPCO INTERMEDIATE 9 LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2023
PEACE CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2023
PULIZZANO, MICHELEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2023
SCHLAFF, BENNYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2023
SCHLAFF, NACHUMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-25.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.8M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 45%Medicare 29%Other / private 26%

This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$566per resident / day
operating cost
$17,195per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$452per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315342. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next