Complete Care At Shrewsbury LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 516 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 155 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 107.8 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision of residents by specifically failing to prevent Resident (R) #60 from wandering into other residents' rooms leading to physical altercations with other residents. Due to the vulnerable nature of the nursing home population, a potential for serious injury or serious physical or psychosocial impairment from being hit by R #60, or R #60 being hit, existed, and the likeliness of R #60 hitting another resident or being hit by another resident in the facility was high and required immediate action to prevent further events of physical abuse by or to R #60. This deficient practice was identified for one out of two residents (Resident #60) reviewed for resident to resident abuse. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 11/27/23, the date of the first incident of resident abuse by R #60. Review of Nurse Notes located in the EMR under the Progress Notes tab revealed the following entries related to R…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident of three (Resident (R)53) of 33 sampled residents were treated with dignity in toileting. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the quality of life and self-esteem for the affected resident.Findings include: Review of R53's admission Record located in the resident's EMR section titled Profile revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms. Review of R53's annual MDS with an ARD of 05/10/25 located in the resident's EMR tab titled MDS revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out 15 points which indicated the resident's cognition was intact and able to make his own decisions. The resident was assessed to have an indwelling catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. The resident required substantial assistance with toileting. Review of R53's Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-25 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was coded accurately for five residents (Residents (R)44, R9, R133, R6, and R80 in a total sample of 33 residents. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs.Findings include: 1. Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (an inadequate oxygen supply to the body). Review of an 06/16/25 Nursing Progress Note located in the Progress Notes tab of the EMR revealed, .Patient received via stretcher from [hospital name withheld] at approximately 11:35 PM. Patient is alert and awake. Noted with moments of forgetfulness. Respirations easy and unlabored on oxygen at 2L [liters] via nasal cannula. Review of a modified quarterly MDS located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an ARD…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed and/or implemented for five residents (Residents (R) R1, R7, R14, R36, and R104) from a total sample of 33 residents. This failure had the potential that residents would not receive all necessary care and services.Findings include: 1. Review of R1's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) tab titled Profile revealed the resident was admitted to the facility initially on 03/28/21 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included Asperger's syndrome (developmental disorder to effectively socialize and communicate. Review of R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/11/25 located in the EMR tab titled MDS revealed for Active Diagnosis listed the resident with Asperger's syndrome. Review of R1's Care Plan with a revision date of 09/15/25 located in the EMR tab titled Care Plans revealed the care plan did not address…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure four of five residents (Resident (R)12, R82, R89, and R129) reviewed for immunizations out of a total sample of 33 residents had been offered and/or provided a pneumococcal immunization This failure increased the risk of residents contracting pneumonia.Findings include: 1. Review of R12's electronic medical record (EMR), located under the Census tab revealed R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses found under the Medical Diagnosis tab included encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery of the digestive system, colostomy, and an incisional site infection. Review of R12's paper medical record revealed no documentation that the resident had been offered a pneumococcal immunization. 2. Review of R82's EMR , located under the Census tab of the EMR, revealed R82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses found under the Medical Diagnosis tab included acute cystitis without hematuria, unspecified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual the facility failed to ensure that a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed for one resident (Resident (R)6) from a total sample of 33 residents. This failure had the potential for residents not to receive appropriate care in timely manner.Finding include: Review of R6's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) tab titled Profile revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease, bipolar disorder, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, and heart failure.Review of R6's Physicians' Orders dated 05/01/25 located in the resident's EMR tab titled Orders revealed Affinity Hospice was to evaluate and treat.Review of R6's Affinity Care Facility Notification of Admission dated 05/05/25 located in the resident's EMR tab titled Miscellaneous revealed the resident was accepted into the hospice program on 05/05/25.Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to revise care plans for two residents (Residents (R) 137 and R9) from a total sample of 33 residents. This failure had the potential for residents to have unmet care needs. Findings include: 1.Review of R137's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) tab titled Profile revealed the resident was admitted initially to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease with dialysis dependency. Review of R137's Physicians Orders dated 12/17/24 and located in the EMR tab titled Orders revealed the resident was to receive dialysis Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. The order included for nursing to Monitor Bruit and Thrill to Left arm fistula every shift. Monitor Hemodialysis site for signs/symptoms of complications (e.g., bleeding, swelling, pain, drainage, odor, hardness, or redness at site). Notify the physician and dialysis center…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing assessments of a surgical incision were provided for one resident (Resident (R)132) in a total sample of 33. This failure placed residents at risk of health complications and hospitalization.Findings include: Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R132 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of a right hip fracture with surgical repair. Review of the 09/16/25 admission Comprehensive Nursing Assessment located in the Assessments tab of the EMR revealed under the Skin Assessment section revealed that R132 had a surgical wound. There was no further documentation to show an assessment of the surgical site. Review of the 09/16/25 admission Nursing Progress Note located in the Assessments tab of the EMR revealed, .XXX[AGE] year-old male patient arrived at facility via wheelchair accompanied by one transport from [hospital name withheld] with primary diagnosis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to monitor the effectiveness of wander guards and modify interventions for two of 33 sampled residents (Resident (R)16 and R69). This failure had the potential to interfere with the residents' right to self-determination and their right to make choices about significant aspects of their life in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of R16's Resident Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Resident tab, revealed an admission date of 10/21/23 with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease. Review of R16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the EMR under the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/01/25, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, indicating R16 was moderately cognitively impaired. This same MDS indicated there were no changes in R16's mental status and there were no wandering…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the Social Service Director job description, the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Social Services Assessment was completed upon admission for one resident (Resident (R)66) in a total sample of 33 residents. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet psychosocial needs.Findings include: Review of an undated Social Services Director job description revealed, .The Social Services Director (SSD) is responsible for overseeing the development, implementation, supervision and ongoing evaluation of the Social Services.The Social Services Director will complete and/or delegate the completion of the social services component of the comprehensive assessment. Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a recent stroke with left-sided paralysis, major depressive disorder, and adjustment disorder with depression. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore the proper Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) when caring for two of two residents (Resident (R)6 and R14) identified as requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) out of a total sample of 33 residents. This failure increased the risk of cross-contamination of microorganisms to other residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R6's admission Record located in the EMR tab titled Profile' revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include moderate protein calorie malnutrition. Review of R6's Weekly Skin Review dated 08/27/25 located in the EMR tab titled Assessment revealed the resident had developed a pressure ulcer to the left buttocks. Review of R6's Physician Orders' dated 09/07/25 located in the EMR tab titled Orders revealed the resident was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) related to wounds. Observation on 09/24/25 at 8:20 AM revealed Certified Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$53,780 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $53,780 — penalty dated 2024-05-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ