No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Complete Care at Linwood, LLC

201 New Road And Central Ave, Linwood, NJ 08221 · For profit - Corporation · 174 certified beds · (609) 927-6131 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (609) 927-6131 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Oct 2024
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1701 New Rd · (609) 653-6403 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
191 New Rd · (609) 601-3001 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
23 Bethel Rd · (609) 927-8133 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1410 Wabash Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.7%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.4%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.3%12.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.3%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication54.7%18.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%5.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.4%15.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.3%12.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.3%80.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.1%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.7%8.1%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.242.071.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.491.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 383 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
80.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 80.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 146 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.8%CMS range 56.4–65.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 9.3–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge80.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.9%CMS range 6.0–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
1.62
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.17
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.07
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
50.9%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 174 beds and averages 136.8 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.27 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-19)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/12/2025 from 09:12 AM until 10:20 AM, the surveyor observed the following in the kitchen in the presence of the Regional Food Service Director (RFSD):1. In the dry storage closet an open bag of gelatin mix wrapped in plastic wrap and an opened bag of potato chips had no labeled open or used by date. The RFSD acknowledged it should be dated, and the items were removed. 2. The high-temperature dishwasher is set to operate between 150 F and 180 F, the final rinse temperature should be 180 F. The surveyor observed the wash temperature at 134 F, the RFSD confirmed the temperature and indicated it should be 150 F. The final rinse temperature was recorded as 150 F, the RFSD confirmed the machine was not at operational temperature and indicated the temperature should be180 F. The dishwasher was immediately stopped…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public by failing to keep the garbage container area free of garbage and debris and failed to have a closed cover over the opening of 1 of 3 garbage containers. This deficient practice was evidenced by:On 02/12/2026 at 10:11 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Regional Food Service director (RFSD), observed the facility's outdoor trash disposal area. The surveyor observed three garbage containers (GC) situated at the rear of the property. One of the GCs had an open lid and contained trash which was exposed to the elements, and another GC observed overflowing with refuse. The area surrounding the three GCs was littered with debris, including but not limited to cardboard boxes and milk crates.On 02/17/2026 at 11:04 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Environmental Service Supervisor (EVSS) stated that the GCs should remain free from debris and the lids should be closed. The EVSS stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility provided documentation, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect during A.) incontinence care for 1 of 2 (Resident # 10) and B.) 3 of 3 dining rooms observed during the Dining Task.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:A) During initial tour on 02/12/2026 at 9:23 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #10 in bed wearing two incontinence briefs. During an interview at the same time with the surveyor, the certified nurse's assistant (CNA) #1 said that they are not supposed to be wearing two incontinence brief. CNA # 1 said that the overnight staff are responsible. She concluded saying when we come and find it, we report it to the nurses.A review of Resident #10's admission record revealed that Resident # 10 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of but not limited to, Dementia (a syndrome characterized by a decline in cognitive function), and type 2 diabetes.A review of Resident # 10 Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and facility provide documentation, the facility failed to ensure staff and vendors utilized appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during resident care in accordance with facility policy and accepted standards of infection control practice.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:During initial tour on 02/12/2026 at 10:12 AM surveyor #1 observed an ultrasound technician (UT) performing an ultrasound on Resident # 152 while in their room. The door to room indicated that the resident was on enhanced barrier precautions (a set of rules where nursing home staff wear gowns and gloves during high-contact care for certain residents to stop the spread of dangerous germs). The ultrasound technician was observed not wearing a protective gown while performing an ultrasound. A review of Resident # 152's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that Resident #152 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of but not limited to prostate cancer, and obstructive and reflux uropathy (a blockage in the urinary tract that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility-provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for 1 of 4 units (South). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/12/2026 during the initial tour, Surveyor # 2 observed the following: At 10:56 AM, Surveyor # 2 observed the Sub-Acute soiled utility room. There was a filled garbage bag on the floor garbage overflowing from the receptacle bin. At 11:02 AM, Surveyor # 2 observed the soiled biohazard room across from room [ROOM NUMBER]. There were filled garbage bags left on floor. A 11:08 AM, Surveyor # 2 observed the biohazard room located in the secured unit. There were filled garbage bags on floor. Also at that time, the surveyor observed a broken hand sanitizer dispenser next to room [ROOM NUMBER]. During initial tour on 02/12/2026 at 9:12 AM, the surveyor observed the following on the South Unit: An incontinence brief and used disposable glove on the floor near a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary facial care to maintain proper grooming and personal hygiene. The deficient practice was observed for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living, (Resident #153).The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 2/12/2026 at 10:37 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #153 resting in bed wearing a hospital gown. The resident's face had thick and untrimmed beard and moustache about 2 inches long. Their hair appeared oily and unkempt. There was a malodorous smell in the room. On 2/13/2026 at 11:38 AM, the surveyor observed the resident in bed wearing a hospital gown. The resident's face was shaven. Their hair appeared oily and unkempt. The resident stated to the surveyor that they did not want to go to the shower but wanted their face shaved. The resident stated that they had been in the facility for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of medical record and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was identified as having a contracture (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity or rigidity of joints) received services to prevent further decreased range of motion (ROM) after discharge from therapy. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for position and mobility, (Resident #12) and was evidenced by the following: On 2/12/2026 at 9:43 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #12 alert but non-verbal and resting in bed. The resident was mechanically ventilated via tracheostomy (a surgical opening in the neck created with a tube to keep the airway open for breathing). The surveyor noted the resident's right hand flexed from the wrist and the right fingers flexed in a fist. The fingernails of the right hand were observed to be trimmed. No positioning device was observed on the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other pertinent facility records, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately implement a physician prescribed fluid restriction order for 1 of 1 resident's (Resident #11) reviewed for dialysis. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 02/13/2026 at 08:59 AM the surveyor observed and interviewed Resident #11 in his/her room. Resident #11 stated that he/she has been receiving dialysis for about 2 months. The surveyor observed a bottle of diet soda, a bottle of water, a carton of milk, a small juice cup, and two clear glasses of a pink colored beverage on the resident's bedside table tray. The surveyor questioned Resident #11 whether he/she was on a fluid restriction. Resident #11 replied that they were unsure if they were. A review of Resident #11's admission Record revealed that, Resident #11 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4 (kidneys no longer work as they should to meet your body's needs) and dependence on renal dialysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of medical record and pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) label and store treatment medications securely inside the treatment cart for 1 unsampled resident (Resident #25), b.) monitor the temperature of refrigerated drugs and biologicals in 1 out of 5 medication rooms (north wing) inspected , and c.) store medications securely in their packaging inside the medication carts for 2 out of 5 medications carts (north wing front cart and east wing even cart) inspected during the medication storage and labeling task. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 2/12/2026 at 10:15 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #25 in bed connected to a mechanical ventilator (a life-support machine that assists a person to breathe). The surveyor observed an uncapped, unlabeled, and unbagged 4-ounce tube of zinc oxide ointment on top of the overbed table located at the foot of the resident's bed. The surveyor also observed an uncapped, unlabeled, and unbagged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolated
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that infection control education was provided and documented for 1 of 1 agency staff members (CNA; Certified Nurse Aide) # 1 providing care to a resident in a room requiring Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/13/2026 at 11:34 AM during a tour of the [NAME] Unit, Surveyor # 2 observed Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) # 1 inside Resident # 102's room.Outside of the doorway of the room was a sign indicating the room required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP; a set of rules where nursing home staff wear gowns and gloves during high-contact care for certain residents to stop the spread of dangerous germs). At that time, the surveyor observed bed sheets on the floor, the privacy curtain half-way drawn, and CNA # 1 operating the bed remote control of Resident # 102 who was laying in the bed. CNA # 1 was not wearing a protective gown or disposable gloves. Upon exiting the room, during an interview with Surveyor # 2, CNA # 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) properly label and date food products stored in a refrigerator, spice rack, and meat freezer; b) properly discard food products on or before the expiration date; and c) properly store food products in a manner without covers. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/02/2024 from 9:47 AM to 10:48 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Dietary Director (DD) and later at 10:47 AM joined by the Regional Dietary Director (RDD), observed the following: 1.) Next to the preparation table near the sink, the surveyor observed breadcrumbs inside a clear container labeled flour and not labeled with an open and use by date. The surveyor then observed a refrigerator referred to as the everything refrigerator. Within the refrigerator, the surveyor observed the following: 2.) A stick of butter opened to air and not labeled with an open and use by date. 3.) Two tomatoes in plastic wrap labeled with a use by date of 09/24/2024. 4.) One quarter pan of cooked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to address the recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for medication management (Resident #70, Resident #92, and Resident #50). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/03/2024 at 08:48 AM the surveyor requested from the Director of Nursing (DON) the CP's recommendations for Resident #70, Resident#92, and Resident # 50, from the last 6 months. 1. A review of the admission Record for Resident#70 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but were not limited to Heart Failure, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel). On 10/03/2024 at 01:17 PM, the DON provided the surveyor with Resident #70's CP recommendation reports for April 2024 through September 2024. The CP recommendation dated 09/12/2024, indicated that the medication Carvedilol (medication used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #NJ167309 Based on interview, record review and document review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain documentation and ensure that a complete and thorough investigation was conducted for residents that had unwitnessed fall. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #278) reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #278. A review of the admission Record (AR) revealed that Resident #278 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system and retroperitoneal abscess (an infection between the abdominal wall and spine). A review of the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 7/17/2023, reflected a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #278's electronic medical record (EMR) Progress Notes revealed the following entries: On 07/22/2023 at 11:40 AM, a nursing progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint: NJ00167309 Based on interview, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan to identify the nursing intervention required to care of a surgical wound infection. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 26 residents (Resident #278) reviewed for care planning. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #278. A review of the admission Record (AR) revealed that Resident #278 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system and retroperitoneal abscess (an infection between the abdominal wall and spine). A review of the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 7/17/2023, reflected a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. Under Section M (Skin Conditions) identified that Resident #278 had a surgical wound and surgical wound care. A review of Resident #278's Order Summary Report did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3.) A review of Resident # 70's admission Record indicated Resident #70 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which include but were not limited to Heart Failure, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a condition that occurs when the body doesn't respond properly to insulin, causing high blood sugar levels), and Morbid Obesity Due to Excess Calories ( a complex disease that occurs when the body stores to much fat due to an imbalance between calories consumed and calories used). A review of Resident #70's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for March 2024 revealed a physician's order (PO) with an order date of 03/14/2024, for negative pressure therapy wound vac with Y connect to B/L [bilateral] hips, change every Mon, Wed, Fri for wound treatment. Surveyor #3 observed a blank on the TAR, there were no nurse's initials indicating the treatment was administered on 03/15/2024. Surveyor #3 observed a PO with and order date 03/07/2024 for Negative pressure therapy wound vac with Y connect to B/L hips, change every Mon, Wed, Fri for wound treatment. Surveyor #3 observed blanks on the TAR,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint # NJ00177156, 00176805 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received showers as scheduled for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #21), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/03/2024 at 10:39 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #21 in the room. He/She stated they would rather be home, but had no issues with this facility. According to the admission Record Resident #21 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included but were not limited to intellectual disabilities and depression. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 08/28/2024 reflected that Resident # 21 was moderately cognitively impaired and that resident required substantial assistance with showering. A review of the September 2024 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident #21 reflected that the Resident was scheduled for showers every Sunday and Thursday on the day shift and if the resident refused a shower, staff should document in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store, label, and remove expired drugs from the facility inventory. The deficient practice was observed in 1 of 3 medication rooms and 1 of 9 medication carts reviewed under the Medication Storage Task. On 10/04/2024 at 9:26 AM, the surveyor observed the [NAME] Wing Medication Storage room in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) #1. At that time, the surveyor observed the following concerns: Three cultures that expired on 09/23/2024. Three cultures that expired on 08/08/2024. Two urine vacutainers that expired on 06/30/2024. One 1000 milliliter (mL) bag of Dextrose solution that expired in July of 2024. Two bottles of Pantoprazole 2 milligram(mg)/mL with a use-by date of 08/30/2024. One bottle of Pantoprazole 2mg/mL with a use-by date of 09/27/2024. At that time, during an interview with the surveyor, the LPN/UM # 1 stated that all medication should have an opening date. Further, she stated that she did not know when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to A.) perform hand hygiene before applying gloves and between changing gloves and B.) failed to follow transmission-based precautions, specifically by not using a gown within a resident's room who was on transmission-based precautions. The deficient practice was observed for 1 of 2 nurses observed for Medication Administration task and 1 of 1 Resident (Resident # 425) reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A.) On 10/03/2024 at 08:18 AM during the Medication Administration task, surveyor #1 observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 1 putting on personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to administering medications to Resident #100. LPN# 1 did not perform hand hygiene prior to putting on gloves. On 10/03/2024 at 08:33 AM surveyor #1 observed LPN # 1 put on a pair of gloves without performing hand hygiene to place a medication patch on Resident # 32. LPN #1 then realized her pen was in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ00160150, NJ00169450, NJ00159215 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to, a.) provide sufficient staffing numbers to meet minimum staffing requirements and b.) provide nursing and related services to assure the residents safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care in accordance with the facility assessment. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #13, and #14) observed for incontinence care and was evidenced by the following: Refer F677(D) a.) Reference: New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) memo, dated 01/28/2021, Compliance with N.J.S.A. (New Jersey Statutes Annotated) 30:13-18, new minimum staffing requirements for nursing homes, indicated the New Jersey Governor signed into law P.L. 2020 c 112, codified at N.J.S.A. 30:13-18 (the Act), which established minimum staffing requirements in nursing homes. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00160150 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper incontinence care was provided to dependent residents. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #13, and #14) observed for incontinence care and was evidenced by the following: On 12/29/23 at 7:52 AM, the surveyor accompanied by Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) completed an incontinence tour on the South Wing Nursing Unit. Three random residents who were identified by the CNAs as being dependent on staff for care, were observed for incontinence care. Surveyor #1, Surveyor #2, and CNA #3 entered Resident #13's room. Resident #13 was in bed wearing a hospital style gown. At that time, the resident granted permission for the surveyors to observe his/her incontinence brief. Surveyor #1 observed an incontinence brief applied to the resident. The CNA opened that brief exposing an additional brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Compliant Number: NJ00159616 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide indwelling urinary catheter (a tube that is placed inside the bladder to facilitate the flow of urine) care in a manner to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for catheter care and urinary tract infection and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but not limited to: neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (person who lacks bladder control due to brain, spinal cord, or nerve problems), chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function over time), and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease of inadequate control of blood levels of glucose). According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 9/20/2022, revealed that Resident #6's cognitive skills were severely impaired, and had an indwelling catheter. Additional review revealed active diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-29 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ00160024, NJ00160394, NJ00160202 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident nurse call system to operate as designed for 3 of 5 call bells observed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/29/23 at 8:00 AM, the surveyor observed North Wing Unit, no resident rooms had a call bell light illuminated above room doors. On 12/29/23 at 8:12 AM, the surveyor entered the Star Spa Bathroom (shower room) on North Wing and observed three call systems. The call bell located next to the toilet was activated by the surveyor at 8:12 am. The surveyor waited three minutes and exited the Star Spa Bathroom and notice no light was illuminated above the door. On 12/29/23 at 8:15 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Unit Clerk (UC). She indicated that if a call system is activated that the phone at the nurses station will sound and indicate what room it was triggered in, additionally the lights…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-19 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and facility job description review, the facility failed to employ either a full time Registered Dietitian (RD) or a qualified Dietary Manager (DM) to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service since March 2023. This failure had the potential to affect 115 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: During an interview on 05/16/23 at 9:35 AM, the DM stated she had been employed as the facility's DM since March 2023. The DM confirmed that she recently completed the Serv Safe course but was not a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The DM stated the facility's Registered Dietitian (RD) was employed on a consultant basis and usually visited the facility once or twice per week. During an interview on 05/19/23 at 2:39 PM, the DM stated she worked as the facility's assistant dietary manager for a year prior to becoming the DM two and a half months ago. The DM confirmed she did not have prior experience working as a director of food and nutrition services in a nursing facility, was not a CDM and was not currently enrolled in a CDM course.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-19 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident, staff, and Ombudsman interviews, the facility failed to provide access to the resident identified telephone, for three of four units (West, East, and North), where calls can be made without being overheard. This failure created the potential for residents to be without private telephone communication. Findings include: On 05/17/23 at 1:00 PM, a Resident Council Meeting was conducted with seven residents (R31, R36, R39, R72, R84, R89, and R91) including the Resident Council President and the Resident Council [NAME] President. The residents present regularly attend the facility's monthly Resident Council meetings. R91 said the Resident Telephone, located at the end of the [NAME] Wing just before entering the secured South wing, is always blocked by wheelchairs and the lift. R91 further stated residents who do not have a private phone or a cell phone cannot access the phone. The other six residents, in attendance, confirmed R91's statement. R91 stated the concern had been raised numerous times with the Ombudsman (resident advocate) without any changes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident, staff, and Ombudsman interviews, the facility failed to provide a functioning ice/water machine on one (West) of four wings. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the proper hydration status of 38 residents who resided on the [NAME] unit. Findings include: 1. Review of R96's electronic face sheet, located on the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder and anemia. Review of R96's Physician Orders, located under the Orders tab of the EMR, revealed no orders for a fluid restriction for R96. Review of R96's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/24/23 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R96 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated R96 was cognitively intact. The assessment recorded R96 was independent in locomotion,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-19 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, review of Resident Council meeting minutes, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have sufficient dietary staff to assure resident meals were served as scheduled. The failure had the potential to affect 115 residents who consumed meals prepared from the facility's kitchen. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes, dated 04/25/23 and provided by the facility, revealed the following concern, . lunch and dinner has been served late . The staff response was . lunch trucks delivered at 11:30 AM and 4:30 PM . dietary must notify staff on the unit floor when trucks arrived . 2. A group interview was conducted on 05/17/23 at 1:00 PM with seven residents whom the facility identified as reliable historians. During the meeting, seven of the seven residents (Residents (R) 31, R36, R39, R72, R84, R89, and R91) voiced complaints about meals being served later than scheduled. R84 stated The food is always cold, tastes terrible, and it's late being delivered. R91 stated Meal trays are brought out on a cart, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, tasting of foods on a requested test tray, record review, review of Resident Council meeting minutes, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and hot to eleven of eleven residents (Resident (R) 33, R34, R67, R111, R31, R36, R39, R72, R84, R89, and R91) reviewed for food palatability. This failure had the potential to affect 115 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen. Findings include: 1. Review of R33's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/17/23 located under the MDS tab. The assessment recorded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 of 15 for R33, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on 05/16/23 at 10:40 AM, R33 stated the food served at meals was not hot. R33 specified the food served at the breakfast meal was cold more often than the other meals. 2. Review of the electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-19 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's meal schedule, the facility failed to have no more than 14 hours between the resident evening meal and breakfast meal the following day. This failure had the potential to affect 115 residents who received meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Food Truck Delivery Schedule, revealed the following scheduled resident evening and breakfast meal delivery times for each unit and the total time scheduled between these two meals that exceeded the 14-hour time frame requirement: Ventilator Unit: Dinner 4:40 PM and Breakfast 7:45 AM- A total of 15 hours and 5 minutes scheduled between the resident evening meal and following breakfast meal. South Unit cart 1: Dinner 4:45 PM and Breakfast 8:20 AM- A total of 15 hours and 35 minutes scheduled between the resident evening meal and following breakfast meal. Low North Unit: Dinner 4:50 PM and Breakfast 8:10 AM- A total of 15 hours and 20 minutes scheduled between the resident evening meal and following breakfast meal. West…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to keep the kitchen's milk refrigerator, electric slicer, three kitchen drawers, and canned food storage racks clean and sanitized and failed to date opened bread products and discard creamed soup and hot dog buns with expired use by dates. This failure had the potential to affect 115 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen. Findings include: 1. Observation during the initial kitchen inspection on 05/16/23 from 9:45 AM to 10:30 AM, with the Dietary Manager (DM) present, revealed the following unclean food preparation and storage equipment: a. The interior of the kitchen's milk refrigerator had a very strong odor of soured milk. Observation under the crates of milk stored inside this refrigerator revealed a brownish and white colored liquid pooled in the bottom of refrigerator that smelled like soured milk. b. The kitchen's electric slicer, covered and ready for use, was unclean with a greasy residue and food debris on its blade and base. c. Three kitchen drawers, with food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy to one of 43 residents (Resident (R)101) on the South unit during care. The failure created the potential for R101 to be exposed to other residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: Record review of the Medical Diagnoses, located in the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, gastrostomy, and colostomy. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/15/23, located in the ''MDS'' tab of the EMR, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. R101 was assessed to require extensive assistance of two persons for activities of daily living (ADL's). R101 was observed on 05/16/23 at 3:47 PM lying in bed in his room. The door to the room was open as well as the privacy curtain which permitted the resident to be seen, without obstruction,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 43 facility residents on one of four wings (South). For seven of 43 residents (Resident (R) 76, R17, R60, R122, R35, R30, R82) the environment was not maintained. Throughout the South unit the temperature was not controlled in a comfortable range creating a warm environment for residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: ENVIRONMENT Observations of the South wing, a secured unit with 43 residents, on 05/16/23 10:44 AM, revealed the following: Resident (R)76's room: Part of a floor tile, approximately five by eight inches, near the head of bed B was heavily damaged with tile missing. There was an unsightly glue-like substance underneath the length of the windowsill that appeared to have run down and dried on the wall. The paint on the bathroom door was heavily marred and scarred. R17's room: There was a broken stationary chair, missing the right arm which exposed an approximate seven-inch spindle where the armrest should have been. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of two medication carts on the secured unit was locked while unattended. This had the potential to affect 10 (Resident (R) 80, R93, R30, R57, R240, R115, R13, R95, R17 and R10) of 43 residents who were at risk for wandering on the secured unit. Findings Include: Review of R80's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located under the MDS tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) and with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/10/23, revealed R80 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15, which indicated R80 was severely cognitively impaired. The MDS recorded R80 had diagnoses which included dementia, anxiety, and major depressive disorder, and self-propelled per wheelchair. Review of R93's significant change MDS, located under the MDS tab of the EMR and with an ARD of 02/23/23, revealed R93 had a BIMS score of 0 out of 15, which indicated R93 was severely cognitively impaired and had diagnoses including dementia with agitation, major depressive disorder, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 84 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Complete Care At Chestnut Hill LLCPassaic, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care At HagerstownHagerstown, MD 1 of 5Complete Care At Harston Hall LLCFlourtown, PA 1 of 5Complete Care At Kimberly Hall NorthWindsor, CT 1 of 5Complete Care At Laplata LLCLaplata, MD 1 of 5Complete Care At Milford Manor LLCWest Milford, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care At Wayne Hills Rehab & Resp CenterWayne, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care at Care AgeBrookfield, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at KensingtonWaukesha, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at Maple Grove LLCMadison, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at Margate ParkChicago, IL 1 of 5Complete Care at the BoulevardChicago, IL 2 of 5Complete Care At Brakeley ParkPhillipsburg, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Fox HillVernon, CT 2 of 5Complete Care At Harborage LLCNorth Bergen, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Harrington CourtColchester, CT 2 of 5Complete Care At HyattsvilleHyattsville, MD 2 of 5Complete Care At Inglemoor, LLCEnglewood, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Monmouth, LLCLong Branch, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Ocean Grove LLCOcean Grove, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Prospect Heights LLCHackensack, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Regent LLCHackensack, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Christian Home LLCWaupun, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Grande PrairiePleasant Prairie, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Heritage LLCDundalk, MD 2 of 5Complete Care at Nazareth LLCStoughton, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Voorhees, LLCVoorhees, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Wall LLCWall, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Fair Lawn EdgePaterson, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Holiday CityToms River, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Lehigh LLCMacungie, PA 3 of 5Complete Care At Oak Ridge LLCCharleston, WV 3 of 5Complete Care At Orange ParkEast Orange, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Phillipsburg, LLCPhillipsburg, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Severna Park LLCSeverna Park, MD 3 of 5Complete Care At Shrewsbury LLCShrewsbury, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Silver Lake LLCDover, DE 3 of 5Complete Care At SpringbrookSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Complete Care at Brick LLCBrick, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care at Corsica Hills LLCCentreville, MD

Showing 40 of 84; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
EEF CAPITAL LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST40%since 06/13/2018
PEACE CAPITAL LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST59%since 06/13/2018
SCHLAFF, BENNYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 06/13/2018
SCHLAFF, NACHUMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 06/13/2018
STEIN, SHALOMIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/13/2018

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$20.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.2M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 14%Other / private 21%

This home reported $3.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$424per resident / day
operating cost
$12,882per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$421per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315185. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next