No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Complete Care At Severna Park LLC

310 Genesis Way, Severna Park, MD 21146 · For profit - Corporation · 138 certified beds · (410) 544-4220 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (67) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 5 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
479 Jumpers Hole Rd · (410) 672-1244 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
540 Benfield Rd · (410) 384-1633 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.7 mi
540 Benfield Rd · (410) 647-9487 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(410) 544-4654 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.5%20.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms40.3%22.8%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.5%22.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.2%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.4%5.9%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.0%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.8%13.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.0%80.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.0%21.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.6%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.611.331.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.631.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 323 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
14.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
78.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 78.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 123 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.4%CMS range 46.2–57.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF14.4%CMS range 11.8–17.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge78.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge73.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge75.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 5.3–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.131.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.73
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.78
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.53
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.53
RN hoursweekends
57.8%
Total nursing turnover
52.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 118.8 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2021-07-26)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2018-08-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 5 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

67 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 57 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility-reported incident investigation, record review, policy review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident remained free from abuse. This was evident for 1 (Resident #29) of 7 abuse investigations reviewed during the recertification and complaint survey.The findings include: On 6/11/26 at 10:47 AM, a review of facility-reported incident #2975907 revealed that on 4/6/2026, at approximately 3:20 AM, Resident # 29 allegedly sustained injuries during an interaction with Geriatric Nurse Assistant (GNA) #31.A review of Resident #29's medical record revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment.According to a telephone interview conducted by the facility with GNA #31, Resident #29 exited his/her room in a wheelchair and approached GNA #31 in the hallway. GNA #31 stated that the resident grabbed his/her hand and repeatedly asked, Where is my table? GNA #31 reported telling the resident that he/she did not have the table; however, the resident continued to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-15 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of property specifically involving the diversion of narcotic medication. This was evident for 2 (Resident #136 and Resident #137) of 2 resident Facility Reported Incidents reviewed for missing narcotic medications during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:1. On 6/09/2026 at 9:08 AM, the surveyor investigated the facility's self-report intake #2784380 which indicated that Resident #136 had 3 pills of a Narcotic medication (Oxycodone: medication prescribed for severe pain) missing on 2/18/2026. The investigation surmised that Staff #41 was asked to go to the Unit Manager's office because the Nursing Supervisor noted that he/she was repeating words during a conversation and had pin pointed pupils. While Staff #41 had gone to the office, Staff #42 and Staff #43 counted the narcotics in the cart that Staff #41 was assigned to throughout the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility investigative materials, medical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a self-reported incident. This was evident for one (incident report #3003592) of 21 reports reviewed during this annual survey.The findings include:On 6/10/26 at 2:08 PM, the surveyor reviewed self-reported incident #3003592. The review revealed that Resident #122 reported to the unit manager on 5/04/26 that his/her nurses had allegedly used inappropriate language.In an interview with Resident #122 on 6/08/26 at approximately 1:00 PM, the surveyor noted that the resident was alert and oriented. The resident's most recent Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)-a short, standardized cognitive screening tool used primarily in long-term care settings to check memory, attention, and orientation-was conducted in April 2026, with a score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognitive function.Further review of the facility's investigation packet revealed that it contained no statement from Resident #122. Additionally, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide nursing care within professional standards of practice regarding safe medication administration. This deficient practice affected 1 resident (Resident #122) out of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration during the annual survey.The findings include:A review of Resident #122's medical records on 6/12/26 at 2:44 PM revealed that on 6/07/26, the resident's scheduled morning medications (ordered for administration between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM) were significantly delayed and not administered until 4:16 PM.The delayed administration included a scheduled 9:00 AM dose of Tylenol (acetaminophen) 650 mg. A further review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that a second scheduled dose of Tylenol 650 mg (ordered for 1:00 PM) was documented as administered just three minutes later, at 4:19 PM. The records indicate that Resident #122 received a combined total of 1,300 mg of Tylenol within a three-minute interval, exceeding the maximum safe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of resident medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received medications and care in a timely manner. This deficient practice affected 1 resident (Resident #122) out of 21 residents reviewed for care provision during the annual survey.The findings include:During the investigation of complaint #3036801 on 6/12/26 at 2:44 PM, a record review revealed that the complainant expressed severe concerns regarding Resident #122's care on 6/08/26, specifically alleging that the resident received delayed care.On 6/15/26 at 8:20 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #122's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR). The review revealed that on 6/07/26, scheduled morning medications (ordered for administration between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM)-which included a diuretic, Parkinson's medication, and blood pressure medications, some of which were scheduled for twice-daily administration-were not administered until 4:20 PM. There was no documentation within the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record reviews, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from accidents and hazards. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) thoroughly assess residents who smoke to ensure their safety, and 2) implement timely interventions for residents experiencing ongoing altercations with peers. This deficient practice affected 2 out of 5 residents reviewed for smoking (Residents #108 and #122), and 2 out of 2 residents reviewed for resident-to-resident altercations (Residents #56 and #81) during this annual survey.The findings include:1) Failure to Assess and Ensure Smoking SafetyDuring the entrance conference on 6/08/26 at 8:20 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated, This is a smoke-free building. However, alert and oriented residents can go outside of the facility's property after signing in and out on the Leave of Absence (LOA) form.On 6/09/26 at 1:36 PM, facility staff provided a list of five current smokers. A review of these residents' medical records revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of medical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary care and follow required clinical protocols for a resident with an indwelling urinary (Foley) catheter. This failure was identified in one resident (Resident #122) out of two residents reviewed for Foley catheter care during the annual survey.The findings include:On 6/08/26 at 1:03 PM, the surveyor investigated a complaint received from an outside source. The review revealed that Resident #122 did not receive appropriate Foley catheter care from the facility staff.A review of Resident #122's medical records on 6/09/26 at 11:27 AM revealed that the resident was evaluated by Urology on 1/23/26. The consultation note from the urologist stated, Remove catheter and have him/her changed every 4 hours. and consult one of our MDs for suprapubic catheter placement. However, there was no subsequent follow-up appointment documented in the facility's system.During an interview with Unit Secretary #8 on 6/09/26 at 12:33 PM, she verified that the most recent urology…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and Facility Reported Incident (FRI) #2980586, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to each resident with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #139) of 3 residents reviewed for pain management during the survey process.Findings included:Non-pharmalogical interventions are identified as an alternative method of treatment for a medical concern without the use of medication. This could include physical, psychological, and lifestyle interventions designed to reduce pain and improve quality of life. The CDC's 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids emphasizes non-pharmacological, non-opioid therapies as the first line of treatment for subacute and chronic pain.On 06/12/2026 at approximately 9:00 AM, a review of FRI #2980586 revealed that on 04/07/2026 at approximately 3 PM Resident #139's family member reported that the resident appeared to be over-medicated.On 06/18/2026 at 09:44 AM, in an interview with Staff #5 (unit manager), she was asked about the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) ensure the accurate documentation of controlled medications administered to residents by maintaining consistency between the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and the controlled substance record (narcotic book), and 2) ensure proper pharmaceutical procedures for the destruction of controlled substances. This was evident for 2 (Residents #71 and #108) of 3 residents reviewed for controlled medication administration and 1 (Resident #137) of 1 resident reviewed in a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) for destruction of discontinued narcotic medications during the recertification survey. The findings includes: 1) On 6/09/2026 8:55 AM, an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #6 revealed that the narcotic book was updated each time a controlled medication was administered and was reviewed during shift report. On 6/09/2026 at 9:26 AM, a review of the narcotic book and corresponding MARs for the month of June 2026 revealed the following: -Resident #108 had a physician's order for Morphine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered as ordered. This was evident for one resident (Resident #5) out of 6 residents reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:A review of facility self-reported incident #3016788 on 6/10/26 at 3:48 PM revealed that Resident #5 received a double dose of Retacrit (a prescription medication that stimulates bone marrow to produce red blood cells) on 5/15/26.A review of Resident #5's medical records on 6/11/26 at 7:30 AM revealed a cardiology follow-up progress note dated 5/13/26, which stated, Hematology has recommended that we increase his/her Retacrit from 20K units q weekly to 40K units q weekly.Further review of Resident #5's medical records noted that a physician's order was entered on 5/15/26 at 7:00 AM for Retacrit 40K units every shift for anemia. As a result, the medication was mistakenly administered twice on 5/15/26: once at 7:00 AM and again at 3:00 PM.The facility's incident investigation included interviews and statements from the nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 57 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' call bells were accessible to residents. This was found evident for 4 (Residents #15, #16, #17, and #20) out of 4 Residents reviewed for call bells during the complaint survey. The findings include:According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), a call bell-also referred to as a resident call system-is a communication device that allows residents to summon staff assistance when needed.On 10/20/2025 at 11:11 AM, this surveyor observed Resident #15 in his/her room. The Resident was lying in bed, and the call bell was found inside the bedside table drawer, out of the Resident's reach.On 10/20/2025 at 11:21 AM, this surveyor observed Resident #16 in his/her room. The Resident was seated in a wheelchair next to the bed, eating breakfast. The call bell was observed on the opposite side of the bed, out of the Resident's reach.On 10/20/2025 at 11:24 AM, Resident #17's call bell was observed wrapped tightly around the bed rail on the opposite side of the bed. The resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was found that the facility failed to have a functioning call bell system for residents. This was found to be evident for 7 (Resident #18, #19, #20, #22, #23, #24, and #25) out of 7 residents reviewed for call bell function during the complaint survey. The findings include:A call bell system is a communication device that enables residents to summon staff for assistance. The system activates a visual and audible signal to alert staff when a resident requests help. When staff respond and acknowledge the call, the signal is turned off, indicating that the resident's request has been addressed. The system is intended to ensure residents have reliable access to staff for timely care and assistance. TELS (Total Equipment Logging System) is the facility's computerized system used to document, track, and manage maintenance work orders and service requests.On 10/20/2025 at 11:45 AM, this surveyor conducted a dual observation with Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #8 in Resident #18's room to check the resident's call bell. When tested, the call bell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility-reported incident investigation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident remained free of abuse. This was evident for 2 (Resident #6 and #8) of 11 abuse investigations reviewed during the complaint survey. The findings include: 1) The facility's investigation related to facility-reported incident #2641751 was reviewed by the surveyor on 10/24/25 at 10:32 AM. The investigation revealed that the facility substantiated the allegation based on Resident #21's statement, which indicated that agency staff Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #4 engaged in verbally abusive behavior, including yelling and using inappropriate language, specifically stating, Shut the f* up if you are able to do it yourself, why don't you? while providing care to Resident #6. During record review on 10/24/25 at 8:00 AM, it was noted that the facility conducted an interview on 10/14/25 with Resident #21's family member (roommate). The family member stated that he/she overheard GNA #4 respond to Resident #6 by saying, I'm not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility-reported incident investigation, record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) within the required timeframe. This was evident for 2 (Resident #6 and #14) out of 2 residents reviewed for reporting abuse allegations during the complaint survey process. The findings include: 1) On 10/21/25 at 8:40 AM surveyor reviewed the facility-reported incident (FRI) #2620209 for Resident #6 revealed that on 9/16/25 at 3:30PM, Resident #6 sustained an injury of unknown origin (left hip fracture). Further review of the facility's investigation on 10/21/25 at 8:50 AM revealed that the facility submitted the initial report of the incident to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) on 9/17/25 at 3:17 PM. The final investigation report was not submitted to OHCQ until 9/25/25 at 9:19 PM. The facility is required to submit the initial report within 2 hours of the incident and the final investigation report within five working days. On 10/24/25 at 9:30 AM during an interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility-reported incident investigation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse. This was evident for 1 (Resident #8) of 11 abuse investigations reviewed during the complaint survey.The findings include: On 10/20/25 at 8:51 AM, a review of Facility- Reported incident #349643 revealed that on 7/3/25, at approximately 9:35 AM, Geriatric Nurse Assistant (GNA #8) allegedly grabbed tea bags from Resident #8's hands. The facility's interview with GNA #3 revealed that while distributing breakfast trays in Unit 2, GNA #3 observed Resident #8 took three tea bags from the cart. GNA #2 then took the tea bags from Resident #8's hands in what GNA #3 described as a tugging back and forth motion. A follow-up interview was conducted by the facility with Resident #8 on 7/3/25 at 10:30 AM, Resident #8 confirmed taking 3 tea bags from the cart and described that GNA #2 grabbed and was pulling my hands multiple times back and forth trying to take the tea bags from me. GNA#2 could have pulled me out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have accurate documentation for a resident. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #2) out of 1 Resident reviewed for accurate documentation during the complaint survey. The findings include:A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care.Speech-language pathology services are those services necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of speech, language and cognitive communication disorders which result in communication disabilities. Speech-language pathology includes evaluation and treatment of swallowing.On 10/24/2025 at 08:17 AM, this surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #2's care plan. The care plan included interventions stating, Please ensure the resident is supervised during meals and Resident to eat only with supervision.On 10/24/2025 at 10:05 AM, this surveyor conducted a record review of the Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) visit dated 05/16/2025. Under the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews is was determined that the faciliy failed to ensure Care Plans were revised and Care Plan meetings were held as required. This was found to be evident for 2 (Residents #91 & #61) out of 2 Residents reveiwed for Care Plan revisions and 2 (Residents #110 and #56) out of 2 Residents reviewed for Care Plan meetings during the annual survey. The findings include: According to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) a care plan meeting is a regularly scheduled gathering where healthcare professionals, residents (or their family representatives), and relevant staff from a facility discuss and review a resident's individual care plan, ensuring it accurately reflects their needs, preferences, and any necessary adjustments based on their current health status; these meetings are typically held quarterly and are a key part of quality care in nursing homes. 1) Surveyor review of a complaint (MD00216698) and facility reported incident (MD00216700) alleging that a facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of facility reported incidents,staff interview, and review of facility policy, it was determined that a facility staff member failed to treat a resident with respect and free from verbal and physical abuse. This was evident during the review of 2 ( Resident #127 and #90) out of 21 Residents reviewed for allegations of abuse. The findings include: Review of the facility reported incident #MD00205993 on 5/9/25 at 8:15 AM revealed that on 5/24/24 there was a witnessed verbal altercation between Resident #127 and staff GNA #32. According to witness statements in the facility investigation packet GNA #32 overheard yelling and cursing at Resident #127 when the supervisor, staff RN #4 separated the 2 individuals and told GNA #32 that she needed to leave the facility immediately. According to a statement from Resident #127, s/he stated that GNA #32 was yelling at him/her because s/he didn't want to see the pictures on his/her phone about the previous staff. Resident #127 just wanted him/her to leave him/her alone and leave his/her room and s/she wouldn't until the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to thoroughly investigate a complaint of abuse. This was evident for 1 (Resident #124) out of 64 residents reviewed during a complaint/annual survey. Findings include: Review of resident #124's facility reported incident (MD 00182893) on 5/13/25 at 8:30am revealed the resident made an allegation of abuse after the resident reported to the facility that a nursing staff member pushed and choked him/her on 8/29/2022. The surveyor review of the facility investigation on 5/13/25 at 1:10pm revealed that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate the events surrounding the allegation of abuse. The facility investigation did not contain other resident interviews disproving widespread abuse from staff. Interview with the Administrator on 5/13/25 at 1:35pm confirmed the facility investigation of resident #124's allegations did not contain resident interviews disproving widespread abuse from staff.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility staff and Resident interviews and surveyor record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to document the delivery of daily wound care for Residents with pressure ulcers. This was found to be evident in 2 (Residents #36 and #114) out of 2 Residents reviewed for treatment and services of pressure ulcers. The findings include: During the initial tour of the facility at 08:45AM on 05/05/2025 the surveyor observed Resident #36 sitting in the wheelchair with specialized heel protectors (Prevalon boots) on his/her lower extremities. Resident #36 stated that the heel protectors was for the wound that he/she had on the heel. The Medication and Treatment Administration Record (MAR/TAR) is a record used to keep track of every dose of medication or treatment that a Resident is administered. The MAR and TAR includes key information about the Resident's medication and treatment including the name, dose taken, special instructions and date and time. The surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #36's medical record on 05/09/2025 at 08:55 AM. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility staff interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents. This was found to be evident in 2 (Residents #70 and #91) out of 2 Residents reviewed for accident hazards during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1) The surveyor observed Resident #70 sitting in the wheelchair in the lobby at the front entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 01:15 PM. On 05/12/2025 at 12:35 PM the surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #70's medical record. Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #70 was found on the floor in his/her room on 05/12/2024 at 18:12 PM which was documented in the progress notes of the medical record. Additionally, it was documented that Resident #70's bed had flipped over on the side, but not on the Resident. The surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) at 06:30 AM on 05/13/2025 the facility's incident report for Resident #70's fall and incident for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to have an order to address and medicate different pain levels in a resident. This was evident during the review of a complaint for Resident #132 and the review of 1 of 6 residents' medication orders. (#132). The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #132 on 5/5/25 at 11:12 AM revealed admission to the facility post fall with multiple fractures requiring healing and physical therapy. Further review of the medical record for Resident #132 revealed physician orders on admission for Oxycodone 5 milligrams (mg) 2 tablets every 4 hours as needed for severe pain, a documented score of 7-10. However, a review at this time failed to reveal an order for pain medication for pain scores below '7.' A review of the medication administration record (MAR) for December 2024 noted that the Oxycodone was administered 64 times, 19 for pain scores of 0-6, in addition to 45 times for the score of 7-10. This concern was reviewed with the facility DON on 5/5/25 and again at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide trauma-informed care after a resident expressed past traumas to a facility staff member. This was evident for 1 (resident #24) of 64 residents reviewed during a complaint/annual survey. Findings include: Review of resident #24's medical record on 5/12/25 at 7:40am an admission document dated 9/19/24, the date of the resident's admission. The document described the resident's past trauma with his/her family which caused him/her to run away from home at a young age. Further review of resident #24's medical record on 5/12/25 at 8:10am revealed no evidence that the resident's care plan was created with interventions for the resident's past trauma. On 5/12/25 at 11:30am, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding the trauma informed care policy. The DON confirmed resident trauma informed assessments should be done at admission and after a change in condition. The surveyor pointed out that resident #24 alleged that he/she had family trauma at a young age that caused he/she to run away from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of a facility reported incident (FRI) #MD00205993 related to an allegation of abuse, a review of employee files and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) were competent with their skill sets. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 3 employee files reviewed for competencies and skill sets. The findings include: Review of the FRI #MD00205993 on 5/9/25 at 8:15 AM revealed a substantiated allegation of verbal abuse occurring between Resident #127 and GNA #32. A review of the facility investigation and concurrent review of the employee file for GNA #127 revealed that upon hire the month prior, there was no competency skills evaluations or check off sheets completed and available in her record for review. The DON was interviewed on 5/9/25 at 10:46 AM. This concern was brought to her attention as she was present and had completed this investigation and investigation packet. She was not aware of the blank competency check list. She was asked at this time for anything further or any education or training…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) monitor the behaviors of a resident on antipsychotic medications. 2) ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications. This was evident by 2 (Residents #61 and #111) out of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication during the recertification and compliant survey. The findings include: 1) Resident #61 diagnoses included Bipolar Disorder, Psychosis, Major Depressive Disorder and Schizoaffective Disorder. 05/06/25 at 11:38 AM a review of Resident #61's medical record revealed that the resident was receiving antipsychotic medications Fluphenazine daily for Bipolar Disorder and Olanzapine at bedtime for Schizoaffective Disorder. The resident's psychiatry notes dated 2/16/25, 2/16/25, 4/4/25 and 4/16/25, revealed an increase in hallucinations and other behaviors. Further review of Resident #61's medical record revealed that a Care Plan was initated on 11/17/23 for visual/auditory hallucinations, increased anxiousness and agitation. However, the medical record failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of medical record documentation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe and effective system for securing medication in their designated carts on nursing units with residents with documented cognitive deficits and wandering behaviors. This practice was noted on 2 separate random observations on 2 of 2 units. The findings include: 1. During a tour of the secure dementia unit on 5/6/25 at 9:06 AM a medicine cup with a clear liquid in it was identified on an unoccupied medicine cart. There were 2 residents identified in the immediate area. Resident #80's room was immediately to the right of the medication cart where the medication was located. Resident #80 was observed walking around in his/her room and coming in and out of the room looking around and talking to the surveyor. Additionally, another resident identified as #125 was also observed in the hallway walking up and down to the cart and the door to the exit. During this time there were no staff observed in the area. At 9:12 AM staff RN #2 appeared. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate resident records. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #111, #119) out of 2 residents reviewed for documentation accuracy during the survey during the survey process. The findings include: Neurological checks (neuro-checks) are a series of assessments conducted at regular intervals after a fall, especially when a head injury is suspected or cannot be excluded. Their purpose is to monitor changes in neurological status that may indicate complications such as concussion, intracranial bleeding, or increased intracranial pressure. These assessments typically include evaluation of level of consciousness and orientation, pupil size and reactivity, motor strength and movement, speech and behavior, as well as vital signs. Frequency and duration of neuro checks are guided by facility protocol, physician orders, and the resident ' s condition, often beginning with frequent intervals (e.g., every 15-30 minutes) and tapering as the resident remains stable. 1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of a facility reported incident and a complaint it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately document in a resident's medical record (resident #32 and #33) timely documentation of acute changes in condition, activities of daily living (adl) care, and resident information on the transfer record This was evident during the review of 2 of 52 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident # 32 on 10/31/23 at 10:25 AM revealed Resident #32 had multiple co-morbidities including epilepsy, dysphagia, bipolar, chronic pain syndrome and hydronephrosis with renal and urethral calculous obstruction. On 4/23/23 Resident #32 was transferred to the hospital secondary to abdominal distention. A continued review of the nursing progress notes and change in condition reports noted that they were initiated on the day of the event, however, they were not completed until days later. The e-interact form completed for the change in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interview with facility staff and policies it was determined that the facility staff failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse to Administration. This was evident during the review of 1 of 47 facility reported incidents. The findings include: Review of the facility reported incident (FRI) on 10/31/23 reported to the Office of Health Care Quality on 6/30/2023 revealed that the incident had occurred on 6/27/23 and staff did not intervene and report the incident until the following day. According to the facility investigation, on 6/28/23, 2 staff members approached the Director of Nursing reporting inappropriate behavior displayed by another employee towards not only staff but towards residents. This included aggression and loud communication. Again on 6/29 and 6/30 other employees including the house supervisor reported allegedly hearing GNA #34 using profanity towards Resident #38. On 6/30/23 Resident #38 was interviewed about the alleged verbal abuse from GNA #34. Resident #38, according to the FRI, was assessed as having a brief interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to throughly investigate a allegation of neglect as a result of facility nursing staff failing to obtain an accurate inventory of a resident's narcotic medication (Resident #9). This deficient practice affected 1 of 52 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: A Medication Administration Record (MAR) - a document that records when and how much medication a resident is administered. For as-needed pain medication, it also documents what pain score a resident is reporting and whether the pain medication was effective at easing that pain. Failure to maintain an accurate MARs prevents members of the healthcare team from knowing when and why medication has been given. This can result in medication mistakes, overdose, or denying practitioners information on how much medication a resident receives. On 7/29/22, the state of Maryland's Office of Health Care Quality received a facility reported incident report which reported RN #35 miscounted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical record and interview, the facility failed to add soft offloading boots to a resident's heels as an intervention in the care plan (resident #22). This was evident for 1 out of 52 resident reviewed during a compliant survey. Findings include: Resident was admitted to facility on 11/17/22 with a fracture of left hip and left elbow and a wound on the left heel. A medical record review was conducted on 11/16/23 at 12 noon revealed the faclity wound care team assessed the resident #22's left heel wound and ordered a soft offloading boot for heel protection on 11/10/23. Additional review of the medical record revealed the order for soft offloading boots for the resident's left heel weren't given to the Doctor to approve. Additional review of the resident's care plan revealed no interventions for alteration in skin integrity related to left heel pressure ulcer. A interview with Staff # 32, Regional Clinical Services and staff # 33 Corp. [NAME] President of Operations revealed the facility failed to have a care plan for resident #22's Left heel pressure ulcer.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow up with physician recommendations orders. This was evident during the review of a complaint. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident # 32 on 10/31/23 at 10:25 AM revealed Resident #32 had multiple co-morbidities including epilepsy, dysphagia, bipolar, chronic pain syndrome and hydronephrosis with renal and urethral calculous obstruction. In addition with a history of bowel and fecal obstruction. On 4/23/23 Resident #32 was transferred to the hospital secondary to abdominal distention at the request of a family member. Further review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed that on 4/22/23 Resident #32 was observed with abdominal distention. According to his/her medical record and hospitalizations, this was not the first time. The physician ordered an abdominal scan with 2 views and lab work according to a nurses 'late entry' progress note. This was all to be completed stat (immediately). Interview with the facility Administrator on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident complaint # MD00181865, and review of medical records (GNA [NAME]) the facility failed to change resident # 4 that cannot due by self. This was evident for 1 out of 1 resident. Findings include: A GNA (Geriatric Nursing assistant) GNA [NAME] is a record of what care is provided to residents on a daily basis. On 11/2/23 a medical record review was conducted for resident # 4. Family complained of resident being left wet and not changed on a regular basis for the month of August 2022. The GNA [NAME] was obtained by the Administrator. The record indicated the resident was not given care for toileting and hygiene. Resident was not given personal hygiene on the following dates: Aug. 2022 Day shift: 8/3/22 8/6/22 8/8, 9, 10, 8/22, 23 Evening shift 8/12/22 Night shift 8/7, 19, 22, 27 Toileting Aug. 2022 Day shift 8/3, 6, 8,9,10, 22, 23, 28 Eve shift 8/12/22 Night shift 8/7, 19, 22, 27. Administrator was made aware and stated that during that time period, agency was in the building due to Covid 19.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of medical records, Controlled Medication Utilization Record sheets, Medication Administration Record (MAR), and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently document the administration of an as-needed (PRN) pain medication on the electronic MAR and further monitor the resident's pain level and efficacy of the medication. This was evident during the complaint survey for Resident #30. The findings include: 1. A review of Resident #30's clinical record revealed that the resident's primary physician ordered oxycodone 5 mg every 4 hours as needed for pain. Oxycodone is a strong narcotic pain-reliever. A review of the April Control Medication Utilization Record revealed oxycodone 5 mg on the following days and times was removed from the controlled lock box on 4/13/23 at 11PM, 4/14 at 3:30AM, 4/16 at 1AM, 4/17 at 2AM, 4pm and 10PM, 4/18 at 2:30AM, 3PM, 4PM, 8PM, and 4/19 at 12MN, 3AM, and 4PM. Further review of the resident's clinical records revealed that the resident April Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that facility nursing staff failed to have an accurate inventory of a resident's narcotic medication (Resident #9). This deficient practice affected 1 of 52 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: A Medication Administration Record (MAR) - a document that records when and how much medication a resident is administered. For as-needed pain medication, it also documents what pain score a resident is reporting and whether the pain medication was effective at easing that pain. Failure to maintain an accurate MARs prevents members of the healthcare team from knowing when and why medication has been given. This can result in medication mistakes, overdose, or denying practitioners information on how much medication a resident receives. On 7/29/22, the state of Maryland's Office of Health Care Quality received a facility reported incident report which reported RN #35 miscounted resident #9's Xanax medication on 7/21/22 which resulted in 2 Xanax tablets being missing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-07-26 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility records and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to revise and document an accurate up-to-date facility-wide assessment. This was evident during review of the sufficient and competent nurse staffing task of the annual survey. This had the potential to affect all residents within the facility. The findings include: A facility-wide assessment is conducted to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The assessment is to include the care required by the resident population considering the types of diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, overall acuity, and other pertinent facts that are present within that population. A copy of the Facility assessment was requested at the initiation of the survey on 7/12/21. Review of the Facility assessment on 7/20/21, revealed the date of assessment or update was documented as 5/1/21. This date corresponded to the facility's Change of Ownership, effective on 5/1/21. The facility assessment did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-07-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon staff interview and a review of facility documentation it was determined that facility staff failed to develop and implement a process to ensure that the Residents electrical or electronic equipment was inspected and failed to ensure that all the mechanical lifts used to transfer residents were inspected on a routine and as-needed basis for safe and effective operation. The findings included: A review of the facility policy required that all resident electrical or electronic equipment be inspected and contain the date of inspection and the initials of the inspector before use in the resident's room. During a tour of this nursing care center on July 12, 2021, at 9 AM the following observations were made: 1. In Room A10-A, Resident #40 had a laptop and cell phone both with charging cables that was not inspected for safety. 2. In Room C08-B, Resident #65 had a laptop and cell phone both with charging cables that was not inspected for safety. On 07/19/21 at 9:19 A.M. an interview with the Maintenance Director (#15) revealed that he had not checked the resident's electric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of resident medical records, and interview with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to, 1) complete a resident's inventory of personal effects at the time of a resident's admission into the facility and update the inventory of personal effects document when a resident brings any new belongings into the facility, and 2) maintain the environment in a manner that was safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike. This was evident for 4 (Residents #42, #56, #76, #77) of 50 residents reviewed during the survey, and seven (Rooms E02, E06, E10, E12, E13, F02 and F12) of 30 rooms observed during the survey. The findings include: An Inventory of Personal Effects is a document that lists common articles of clothing, assistive devices, jewelry, appliances, and small furniture that a resident may bring into the facility. The document has space for staff to document and describe other items. A copy of this document is given to the patient or patient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that opened medications were documented with the date opened and included an expiration date for the medication. This was found to be evident in 2 out of 3 medication carts, 1 out of 2 treatment carts, and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms observed in the facility. The documentation of the medication refrigerator temperature in the medication storage was not compliant with the policies of the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 07/16/21 at 1:05 PM. There were three medication treatment carts, two medication storage rooms, and six medication carts within the facility. The surveyor performed the observation of three medication carts, one treatment cart, and one medication storage room during the annual survey. An observation of the Medication Storage Room located on Unit E was conducted on July 19, 2021, at 11:48 A.M.: On 07.19.2021 at 1148, the surveyor reviewed the medication refrigerator sign off checklist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-26 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident/resident representative in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 1 of (#53) of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: Review of Resident #53's electronic and paper medical record on 7/20/21 at 8:30 AM revealed on 5/3/21 at 11:30 PM Resident #53 was transferred to the hospital for a change in medical condition. Further review of Resident #53's medical record documentation revealed that the responsible party was called, however, there was no written documentation that the responsible party and/or resident was notified in writing of the hospital transfer. An interview was conducted with the Unit Manager (staff #19) on 7/20/21 at 11:00 AM. She indicated that there would be a form related to the bed hold and/or the written notification. The Unit Manager proceeded to review the paper chart and confirmed that a hospital transfer form notification for the resident or resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to orient, prepare, and document a resident's preparation for a transfer to the hospital. This was evident for 1 (#53) of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey. The findings include. Review of Resident #53's electronic and paper medical record on 7/20/21 at 8:30 AM revealed on 5/3/21 at 11:30 PM Resident #53 was transferred to the hospital for a change in medical condition. Review of a note timestamped for 5/4/21 at 00.08 revealed that Resident #53 was found on the floor with an eyebrow laceration and complained of hip pain. A Nurse Practitioner was notified at 11:14 PM and an order was received to send Resident #53 out via 911 to the emergency room for further evaluation. There was no written documentation found in the medical record that Resident #53 was oriented and prepared for the transfer in a manner that the resident could understand and there was no documentation of the resident's understanding of the transfer in the medical record. An interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of the bed hold policy upon transfer of a resident to an acute care facility. This was evident for 1 (#53) of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #53's electronic and paper medical record on 7/20/21 at 8:30 AM revealed on 5/3/21 at 11:30 PM that Resident #53 was transferred to the hospital for a change in medical condition. Further review of Resident #53's medical record documentation revealed that the responsible party was called, however, there was no written documentation that the responsible party and/or resident was given a copy of the bed hold policy. An interview was conducted with the Unit Manager (staff #19) on 7/20/21 at 11:00 AM. She indicated that there would be a form related to the bed hold and/or the written notification in the medical chart. The Unit Manager had proceeded to review the paper chart and confirmed that a Bed Hold Policy Notice form for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical record and interview with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately assessed the state of a resident's vision. This was evident for 1 (Resident #42) of 50 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure that each resident receives the care they need. The surveyor interviewed Resident #42 on 7/12/21 at 12:00 PM. During the interview, the resident stated that his/her glasses had gone missing. The resident stated that s/he had told so many people but none of them found his/her glasses or supplied him/her with new ones. The resident stated that s/he cannot read without glasses, which s/he stated was his/her primary form of entertainment. The surveyor reviewed Resident #42's medical record on 7/19/21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was reviewed by the interdisciplinary team and the resident or their representative at least quarterly. This was evident for 2 (Residents #23 and #42) of 50 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: Care plans are developed for residents to guide the care that residents receive in the facility. They are required to be developed within 7 days of completion of a resident's admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and revised at least every quarter (or more often as needed). The facility is required to have care plans developed and revised by an interdisciplinary team including: the attending physician, a registered nurse, a nursing aide, a representative from dietary services, the resident, and the resident's representative (as practicable). #1) The surveyor reviewed Resident #23's medical record on 7/21/21 at 11:30 AM. The review revealed that Resident #23 had received a care plan meeting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of resident medical record, and interview with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with an activity program that, based on residents' care plans, was designed to meet all residents' expressed interests and support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, as evidenced by Resident #42 being denied the opportunity to participate in group activities or go outside, in part because the resident was unnecessarily kept in bed. This was evident for 2 (Resident #42 and Resident #67) of 6 residents reviewed for activities. The findings include: The surveyor interviewed Resident #42 on 7/12/21 at 12:08 PM. During the interview, the resident stated that s/he hasn't gotten out of bed for about two weeks. The resident also expressed interest in going outside and participating in group activities. The resident was in bed at the time of the interview. The surveyor observed Resident #42 in bed on 7/12/21 at 2:04 PM, on 7/13/21 at 11:10 AM, on 7/14/21 at 1:19 PM, on 7/15/21 at 1:10 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical record, observation, and interview with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to determine if Resident #42 had glasses or required glasses for reading. This was evident for 1 (Resident #42) of 2 residents reviewed for communication and sensory needs. The findings include: The surveyor interviewed Resident #42 on 7/12/21 at 12:00 PM. During the interview, the resident stated that his/her glasses had gone missing. The resident stated that s/he had told so many people but none of them found his/her glasses or supplied him/her with new ones. The resident stated that s/he cannot read without glasses, which s/he stated was his/her primary form of entertainment. The surveyor observed Resident #42's room and could not locate any glasses or other forms of corrective lenses in the room. The surveyor reviewed Resident #42's medical record on 7/19/21 at 8:30 AM. The review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in August, 2020, with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's dementia, and that the resident's most recent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to apply a resident's resting hand splint as ordered. This was evident in 1 (Resident #77) of 2 resident charts reviewed for assistive devices. The findings are: Observation of Resident #77 on 7/13/21 at 1:30 PM revealed the resident was not wearing the resting hand splint. Review of Resident #77's medical record on 07/15/21 revealed a physician order written and dated 06/30/21: Resident to wear left resting hand splint; on during AM care off at bedtime. Check skin pre/post application every morning and at bedtime. Observation on 07/15/21 at 12:10 PM revealed Physical Therapist #30 was providing therapy to the resident. Resident #77 was not wearing his/her resting hand splint. In an interview with the Rehabilitation Director, #20, on 7/16/21 at 9:52 AM revealed that Physical Therapist #30 was working with Resident #77 for pain management and range of motion (ROM) for the left knee. When a device is recommended by rehab and in-service is done with the staff, and we keep a copy. Nursing is responsible to make sure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to thoroughly assess the need for pain medication for Resident (#12). This was evident for 1 of 2 residents selected for pain assessment and 1 of 50 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: Pain is often regarded as the fifth vital sign regarding healthcare because it is accepted now in healthcare that pain, like other vital signs, is an objective sensation rather than subjective. As a result, nurses are trained and expected to assess pain. A component of pain assessment-focusing on words to describe pain, intensity, location, duration, and aggravating or alleviating factors. It is the expectation the facility staff assess pain prior to and after the administration of pain medication to determine the need of the medication and the effectiveness of the medication. This pain scale is most used. A person rates their pain on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero means no pain, and 10 means the worst possible pain. On 7/15/21 a medical record review for Resident #12 on 1/27/21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to have a process to ensure that pharmacy recommendations were timely acted upon. This was evident for 1 (#50) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Resident #50's medical record was reviewed on 7/20/21. Review of the monthly Medication Regimen Review in the electronic health record (EHR) revealed that the pharmacist had made a recommendation on 5/29/21. Further review of the EHR and the paper chart did not reveal documentation related to the consultant pharmacist's recommendation of 5/29/21. Upon request on 7/20/21 at 2:50 PM, the Unit Manager/Director (staff #19) reviewed Resident #50's medical record and she did not find the consultant pharmacist recommendation from 5/29/21. A follow-up interview was conducted with staff #19 at 8:51 AM on 7/21/21. The Unit Manager revealed that she had to contact the pharmacy to get the report and had responded to the Pharmacist recommendations of 5/29/21. Resident #50 was receiving the antipsychotic medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was prepared and stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: The surveyor conducted an initial brief tour of the kitchen on 7/12/21 at 8:30 AM. During the tour, the surveyor observed a tray of pork tenderloin that was thawing in the refrigerator on a non-drip tray. A sealed cardboard box was canted in the tray and the cardboard box was in the juice of the thawing meat. At about 8:45 AM, the surveyor observed a cart full of trays of chocolate desserts that was positioned next to the handwashing sink. The cart was close enough that the cart was touching the sink. The desserts on the cart were uncovered. Dietary Assistant #36 was observed to rotate the cart so that he could reach the faucet of the sink, however, the cart remained very close to the sink. Dietary Assistant #36 washed his hands with the exposed desserts close enough that they were at risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that infection control practices were followed while providing wound care. This is evident in 1 (Resident #9) of 2 records reviewed for wounds. The findings include: On 07/21/21 at 10:37 AM a review of Resident #9's wound care order dated 07/01/21 revealed; Clean sacrum (bottom of the spine) with NSS (normal salt saline), pat dry and apply small amount of Medi-Honey (treatment for removal of dead cells or tissue), followed by CA Alginate (absorbent dressing), cover with Optifoam (absorbent outer foam dressing) dressing every 24 hours PRN (as needed). On 07/21/21 at 11:20 AM, surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN) #28 perform the ordered dressing change for Resident #9. The nurse did not wash her hands or sanitize the table used to create the dressing field. The dressing supplies were not placed on a sanitized surface. RN# 28 failed to wear gloves before picking up the 4x4 gauze that were used after cleansing the wound. The nurse removed scissors from her pocket and without sanitizing them,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0924 — isolated
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that hand rails were secured firmly to the wall. This was evident for 2 resident areas observed during the survey. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors on the unit. The findings include: On 7/16/2021 at 10:17 AM during a tour of the facility, the handrail outside Room A9 was observed to be loose and not securely affixed to the walls. It was also observed at this time that the handrails were missing from outside Room E5 adjacent to the fire doors. The Administrator and Director of Nursing were made aware of these findings during the exit conference on 7/26/2021.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-08-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medication cart observations and staff interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that the medical record was kept in a confidential manner. This was evident in 1 out of 3 medication carts. The findings include: On 8/21/18 at 10:40 A.M. on the A-wing Long Term Care Unit, the surveyor observed on top of a standing unattended medication cart ( #2) a single piece of paper that was visable for public viewing. On the paper was written the full vital signs data for the residents who resided in Rooms A-6, A-7 and Room A-7B. The document was not kept in a confidential manner. The Surveyor stood at this unattended medication cart #2 for ten minutes without nursing staff returning. On the same day 8/21/18 at 10:55 A.M., Nurse staff member #5, who was observed at the nursing station charting was interviewed by the Surveyor. Staff Member #5 replied, I didn't realize I left the paper on the cart. During the same interview Nurse staff member #5 informed the surveyor that, all medical information is to be kept in a confidential manner and out of public viewing. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-08-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that: 1) Resident #94 did not receive an unnecessary blood draw; and 2) blood pressure medication was held according to the physician's orders for Resident #57. This was evident for 2 of 49 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1) The Hemoglobin A1C (glycated hemoglobin) blood test is used to identify the average blood glucose (blood sugar) over a three-month period. Beginning on 8/15/18 at 9:45 AM during a review of the medical record for Resident #94, the following physician order was found: A1C every 3 months-follow/up for DM (diabetes mellitus) one time a day every 3 months starting on the 10th for 28 days. It is standard practice for physician treatment orders such as this one to be transferred to a Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the nurses to sign after administering the treatments. A review of the TAR from 8/1/18 through 8/21/18 revealed that some nurses were signing as though the orders were being completed daily and some were not. Days 10-15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews during an environmental tour, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide housekeeping services, necessary to maintain the residents sit to stand lift devices in a sanitary and clean manner. This is evident for 4 out of 10 medical transfer equipment devices during the survey process. Facilities use various medical equipment to assist residents at patient transfers. The stand-up lift is a product that ensures the caregiver's security and aids in standing residents that need it. The findings include: On 8/17/18 at 2:05 P.M. the surveyor observed on the E-wing hallway, at room E-4, an Invacare lift to stand. The device was observed to be dirty with dried white and red old fluid stains located on the knee leg brace. The foot plate was, also, observed dirty with old food debris not cleaned or sanitized with white dripping stains visible on the foot plate. On 8/17/18 at 2:08 P.M. the surveyor observed in the E/F-wing shared residents shower room, a dirty sit to stand lift by Invacare which was dirty with dried fluid stains,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-22 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that residents or resident representatives were notified in writing that they are being transferred out of the facility to a hospital and the reason why the facility is transferring the resident out. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 4 resident's involving Resident #74 (R#74) reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey process. The findings include: On 8/23/18 Resident #74's medical records were reviewed. This review revealed that a nurse's transfer to hospital note was written on 2/18/18 which revealed that Resident #74 had an unplanned change in condition which the resident was transferred to the acute hospital for medical evaluation. Review of the nurse's transfer note revealed that the resident's responsible person (RP) was called and given an update on the resident's status and that the resident was being transferred out to the emergency room. Further review of the medical records failed to reveal any documentation that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined facility staff failed to: 1) clarify an unclear physician order for Resident #94 and accurately document the treatment administration; and 2) document the status and resolution of a skin condition for Resident #371. This was evident for 2 of 49 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1) The Hemoglobin A1C (glycated hemoglobin) blood test is used to identify the average blood glucose (blood sugar) over a three-month period. Beginning on 8/15/18 at 9:45 AM during a review of the medical record for Resident #94, the following physician order was found: A1C every 3 months-follow/up for DM (diabetes mellitus) one time a day every 3 months starting on the 10th for 28 days. This order is confusing as evidenced by nursing documentation on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). The TAR for this facility is an electronic document where physician ordered treatments are listed and is used by nursing staff to sign after administering the treatments. A review of the TAR from 8/1/18 through 8/21/18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that personal hygiene equipment was properly stored to avoid possible cross-contamination. Residents #49 and #94 had the potential to have been affected by this. This was evident in the shared bathroom for 2 of 49 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 8/14/18 at 11:15 AM it was noted that bath basins labeled with the names of Residents #49 and #94 were stacked one inside of the other and sitting on the shared bathroom floor. As infectious organisms may be transmitted through indirect contact via inanimate objects, it is a minimal standard of nursing practice to store items separately that are designated for personal hygiene use. Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #1 was shown the findings and the Assistant Director of Nursing for this unit was made aware, as well.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2017-05-18 · tag F0164 — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that personal privacy and confidentiality was maintained for 6 residents (#2, #16, #189, #223, #289, and #300) of 44 residents selected for review in the Stage 2 sample. This practice created the potential for individuals other than those providing care for the residents to read specific confidential medical information that pertained to these residents. The findings include: HIPAA, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, is a Federal law that gives patients/residents rights over their health information and sets rules and limits over who can look at and receive residents' protected health information (PHI). The Privacy Rules applies to all forms of residents' protected health information, whether electronic, written, or oral. An observation conducted on 05/18/2017 on the D/E Unit at 9:00 AM revealed that resident order sheets had been pushed under the Assistant Director of Nursing's (ADON) closed and locked door. The orders were clearly visible from the hallway and were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2017-05-18 · tag F0241 — pattern
    Provide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that: 1) a resident's catheter drainage bag was covered, 2) that the environment was kept in a manner that enhanced the dignity of a resident, and 3) that an unwanted visitor was prevented from entering a resident's room without being invited. This practice affected 3 residents (#292, #6, and #25) of the 44 residents selected for review in the Stage 2 sample. The findings include: 1) At 11:30 AM on May 18, 2017, the surveyor observed Resident # 292 being transported in a wheel chair by an Occupational Therapist (Employee # 1) The resident was wearing shorts, with a catheter drainage bag clearly visible with no dignity cover. Catheter drainage bags should be covered to protect the dignity of residents using them. 2) Resident #6 is a cognitively intact resident currently residing at the facility without a roommate. An observation conducted on 05/17/2017 at 11:00 AM revealed a strong urine smell emanating from Resident #6's room that was detectable from the hallway. Observations were made on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2017-05-18 · tag F0253 — pattern
    Provide housekeeping and maintenance services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation while conducting the initial facility tour and confirmed while conducting environmental rounds with facility staff, the facility failed to ensure that resident areas were kept clean and in good repair. The findings include: On May 17, 2017, beginning at 10:20 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Director of Maintenance, the Corporate Environmental Services Director and the Nurse Practice Educator conducted environmental rounds. Random rooms were selected for inspection, based on availability. The following items were observed: 1) The thresholds between the resident bedrooms and adjoining toilet rooms was missing, leaving an unfinished surface that is unable to be cleaned in rooms E 8, E11, E12 and E13. 2) Floors were unclean in the E wing dining room, room E7, the Station 2 shower room, the E wing pantry, the Homestead carpeted hallway, the Homestead dining room, rooms F5, rooms D5, D7, and the central supply closet. In room D5, trash and a used glove were observed on the floor. 3) Raised toilet seats were rusty in rooms F3 and E 9, not allowing for cleaning and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2017-05-18 · tag F0441 — pattern
    Have a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation while conducting the initial facility tour and confirmed while conducting environmental rounds with facility staff, the facility failed to ensure that resident care items and toiletries were stored in a manner that reduces the risk of infection. The findings include: On May 17, 2017, beginning at 10:20 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Director of Maintenance, the Corporate Environmental Services Director and the Nurse Practice Educator conducted environmental rounds. Random rooms were selected for inspection, based on availability. The following items were observed: 1) An unlabeled urinal was hanging on the grab bar in the E 12 toilet room. 2) A pad for a wheelchair foot rest was on the floor in room E 11. 3) In the Station 1 shared shower, pillows were stored on a shower chair. A soiled dining chair. 4) In the A hall private shower, two bottles of body wash, a can of shaving cream, all unlabeled, were stored on the counter. 5) In room A4, a shared toilet room an unlabeled bottle of body wash was observed on the sink. 6) In room F3, bathroom tissue was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-05-18 · tag F0157 — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical records, staff interviews, and a family member, It was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the physician that Resident #256 refused a medication that was obtained as an emergency because the resident had become agitated and restless. This was evident for 1 out of 44 residents surveyed during Stage II of the survey process. The findings include: On 1/27/17, Staff #5 documented that Resident #256 was asleep in bed at the end of the evening shift. At around 1:00 AM the resident's bed alarm was heard beeping. When Staff #5 attended to the resident it was noted that the resident was agitated and restless, and refused vital signs. Staff #5 notified the physician and received an order for Seroquel 25 mg for agitation, a one-time only dose. Staff 5 documented that the resident refused the medication, therefore, the medication was not administered. The nurse failed to notify the physician about the resident's refusal to take the medication, or for further instructions as to whether to give the resident an intramuscular injection, or how to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-05-18 · tag F0244 — isolated
    Listen to the resident groups and act on their complaints and suggestions that affect resident care and life.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of documentation and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to act on the residents request during their monthly meetings. This was evident in 2 consistent months of resident council meeting minute notes of complaints of dirty hallways and cold food being delivered. The findings include: The Resident Council President was interviewed on 5/18/2017 at 10:00 AM, and confirmed that the main complaints at the last 2 monthly meetings were that the hallways were dirty and the food was being served cold. Review of the resident council meeting minute notes from 3/9/2017 and 4/13/2017 supported the complaint that the facility staff was not acting on the resident's grievances. During an interview with the Activities Manager on 5/18/2017 at 11:00 AM it was confirmed that the resident council meeting minute notes were accurate.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-05-18 · tag F0279 — isolated
    Develop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and medical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to initiate a nutrition care plan with the appropriate goals and interventions for 1 resident (#232) of the 44 residents selected for review in the Stage 2 sample. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is valuable in preventing avoidable declines in functioning or functional levels. It must reflect immediate steps for assuring outcomes which improve the resident's status and outcomes. A medical record review conducted on 05/17/2017 for Resident #232 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but was not limited to, low body mass index (BMI)-a measure of body fat. It was identified on the 12/02/2016 comprehensive assessment that the resident had a low BMI and it was decided that a nutrition care plan would be initiated. On 05/17/2017 at 1:30 PM when inquiring about Resident #232's nutrition care plan, the Nursing Home Administrator stated that a care plan was never initiated for nutrition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-05-18 · tag F0312 — isolated
    Assist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident's family & facility interviews it is determined that the facility staff failed to maintain appropriate oral hygiene care for Resident # 95. This was evident for 1 out of 44 residents surveyed during Stage II of the survey process. The findings include: On May 11, 2017 during the Stage I interview process, Resident #95's family member complained that the resident was not receiving the appropriate oral care based on the resident's teeth appearing brown with a lot of plaque. On May 17, 2017 at 2:24 PM. the resident's teeth were assessed by this writer and the resident's teeth appeared dirty, thick with saliva and had visible plaque across the bottom teeth. It is the facility's responsibility to make sure that the resident receives services for maintenance of personal hygiene, when the resident is unable to perform such services independently.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-07-26 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of daily staffing records, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to post the total number and actual hours worked by categories of Registered nurses, Licensed practical nurses, and Certified nursing aides per shift and failed to have the staff data requirements available in an accurate, clear and readable format. It was identified that the facility did not have staffing information readily available in a readable format for residents and visitors for the first 4 days of the survey. The findings include. Observations on 7/12, 7/13, 7/14, and 7/15/21 did not reveal the Federal requirements related to the posting of staff. The total number of and actual hours worked by categories of Registered nurses, Licensed practical nurses, and Certified nursing aides per shift was not observed in any part of the facility. An interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 7/15//21 at 9:48 AM. When asked where the facility posts the Federal requirements for the posting of staff she pointed to the Unit 2 staffing posting on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 84 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Complete Care At Chestnut Hill LLCPassaic, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care At HagerstownHagerstown, MD 1 of 5Complete Care At Harston Hall LLCFlourtown, PA 1 of 5Complete Care At Kimberly Hall NorthWindsor, CT 1 of 5Complete Care At Laplata LLCLaplata, MD 1 of 5Complete Care At Milford Manor LLCWest Milford, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care At Wayne Hills Rehab & Resp CenterWayne, NJ 1 of 5Complete Care at Care AgeBrookfield, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at KensingtonWaukesha, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at Maple Grove LLCMadison, WI 1 of 5Complete Care at Margate ParkChicago, IL 1 of 5Complete Care at the BoulevardChicago, IL 2 of 5Complete Care At Brakeley ParkPhillipsburg, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Fox HillVernon, CT 2 of 5Complete Care At Harborage LLCNorth Bergen, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Harrington CourtColchester, CT 2 of 5Complete Care At HyattsvilleHyattsville, MD 2 of 5Complete Care At Inglemoor, LLCEnglewood, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Monmouth, LLCLong Branch, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Ocean Grove LLCOcean Grove, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Prospect Heights LLCHackensack, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care At Regent LLCHackensack, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Christian Home LLCWaupun, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Grande PrairiePleasant Prairie, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Heritage LLCDundalk, MD 2 of 5Complete Care at Linwood, LLCLinwood, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Nazareth LLCStoughton, WI 2 of 5Complete Care at Voorhees, LLCVoorhees, NJ 2 of 5Complete Care at Wall LLCWall, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Fair Lawn EdgePaterson, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Holiday CityToms River, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Lehigh LLCMacungie, PA 3 of 5Complete Care At Oak Ridge LLCCharleston, WV 3 of 5Complete Care At Orange ParkEast Orange, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Phillipsburg, LLCPhillipsburg, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Shrewsbury LLCShrewsbury, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care At Silver Lake LLCDover, DE 3 of 5Complete Care At SpringbrookSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Complete Care at Brick LLCBrick, NJ 3 of 5Complete Care at Corsica Hills LLCCentreville, MD

Showing 40 of 84; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PC MD OPCOS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2021
PC WTA OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2021
SMS 2021 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2021
STEIN, SHALOMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
AMUSAN, IBIRONKEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/12/2023
COX, VICKIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
KETTERMAN, JANEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/19/2022
MANSFIELD, MELISSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
MIRZA, ZIADIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
SILVERBERG, NISANELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
AURORA GUARDIAN HOLDCO IV CO-BORROWER, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
AURORA GUARDIAN HOLDCO IV MEZZ BORROWER, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
AURORA GUARDIAN HOLDCO IV, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
AURORA GUARDIAN IV REALTY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
AURORA GUARDIAN PARTNERS M7 LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
J & R FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
J&R M7 FAMILY INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
L FRIEDMAN 2018 FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
L FRIEDMAN FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
LANDAU FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
M FRIEDMAN 2018 FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
PC WTA ACQUISITION LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
PC WTA M7 LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
PEACE CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
SEVERNA PARK MD OWNER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

19 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$867K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 16%Other / private 9%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $867K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$410per resident / day
operating cost
$12,458per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$405per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215143. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2021-07-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next