Complete Care At Springbrook
12325 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20904 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 93 certified beds · (301) 622-4600 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.0% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.1% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 77.7% | 22.8% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.5% | 22.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.1% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.5% | 5.9% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.3% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.0% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 80.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.2% | 21.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.8% | 9.8% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.03 | 1.33 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.50 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 169 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 62.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.4%CMS range 44.5–62.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 8.0–13.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 62.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 60.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 58.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.4%CMS range 6.4–14.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.28 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 82.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment for the residents. This was evident for multiple areas within the facility observed during the annual survey. The findings include: 1.On 04/27/2026 at 07:31 AM, an observation of the dining room revealed the wall across from the door to the basement stairs by the kitchen door, which had a hole in the wall that was approximately 4 inches long and 2 inches wide. On 04/27/2026 at 7:52 AM, an observation of the left bottom corner wall outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]-CD when looking into the room revealed a piece of the dry wall which was missing, a portion of the wall that exposed through a cracked, and the footboard which was detached from the wall at the end. On 04/27/2026 at 7:53 AM, an observation of the hallway wall outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] which had a large horizontal hole in the wall which was approximately 36 inches long and 2 inches wide. On 04/27/2026 at 7:58 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 14 days after the assessment reference date. This was evident for 6 (Resident #22, # 41, #80, #47, #58, and #69 ) of 7 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: 1, The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on these individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. The MDS is to be completed 14 days after the assessment reference date (ARD). On 4/28/2026 at 9:35AM medical record review of the MDS assessment revealed that Resident #22 the MDS completion date of 4/13/2026 was late. Resident # 41 the MDS completion date of 4/13/2026 was late. Resident #80 the MDS completion date of 4/13/2026 was late. 04/30/2026 8:27 AM Staff #18, the Regional Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment material and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to transmit MDS assessments within 14 days of completion of the assessment. This was evident for 5 (Resident #22, #41, #80, #47 and #58 ) of 7 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: 1.On 4/28/2026 at 12:05 PM information from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) regarding transmission of Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were reviewed. The review revealed that the MDS was not transmitted timely. Resident #22 The assessment Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 4/13/26 was transmitted to CMS late. Resident #41 The assessment ARD 3/20/26 was transmitted to CMS late. Resident #80 The assessment ARD 4/13/26 was transmitted to CMS late. 04/30/2026 8:30 AM Staff #18, the Regional Director of Reimbursement, MDS was Interviewed and confirmed the above MDS assessments were overdue and were not transmitted timely. 2. On 04/29/2026 at 10:35 AM, review of Resident #47's medical record revealed the MDS completed on 4/13/2026 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, Resident and staff interviews and surveyor record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to code Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments accurately for Residents. This finding was found to be evident in 2 (Resident #13 and #23) out of 2 Residents reviewed for falls and continence. The findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated, standardized clinical assessment tool used in Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes to evaluate a Resident's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status, including skin and health conditions, nutrition, continence, medications, treatments, and active diagnoses. It drives care planning, quality monitoring, and reimbursement, with assessments required upon admission, quarterly, annually, discharge and significant changes in status of Residents. The assessment is completed by licensed health care professionals employed by the nursing home, such as a Registered Nurse (RN). The information is transmitted electronically to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were served meals according to their meal ticket. This was evident for 11 (Resident #14, #19, #30, #39, #41, #51, #58, #66, #70, #87, and #92) of 83 trays observed during the lunch meal tray lineThe findings include:On 04/29/2026 at 11:35 AM, an observation of the kitchen lunch tray line revealed [NAME] (Staff #15) started to plate the food. On 04/29/2026 at 12:07 PM, Resident #19's meal ticket was placed on the tray and [NAME] (Staff #16) noted that it indicated the resident was supposed to receive garlic egg noodles as the main food item for the meal. [NAME] (Staff #15) indicated they did not have any garlic egg noodles. Staff #15 gave Resident #19 the regular main for the meal that was on the menu which was turkey.On 04/29/2026 at 12:24 PM, Staff #15 indicated they had finished the unit trays and would start on the dining room trays for those who are eating in the dining room. On 04/29/2026 at 12:33 PM, a follow up observation of the kitchen revealed they ran out of the squash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain residents dignity by staff knocking prior to entering their rooms. This was evident for 3 (Resident #48, #67, #73) of 24 residents screened during the initial pool process of the annual survey.The findings include:1) On 04/27/2026 at 9:03 AM, during the initial interview with Resident #73, Geriatric Nursing Assistant (Staff #20) entered the room when the door was closed, without knocking. As Staff #20 noticed the surveyor, she proceeded to say, knock knock knock, after she had already opened the door and walked into the room.On 04/27/2026 at 9:04 AM, further interview with Resident #73 revealed that some of the staff do not knock prior to walking into the room. 2) On 04/27/2026 at 11:59 AM, during the initial interview with Resident #68, Geriatric Nursing Assistant (Staff #4) opened the door and entered the room without knocking. As Staff #4 noticed the surveyor, she proceeded to knock on the side of the door where the handle was, after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews and surveyor record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to develop/implement a comprehensive care plan for a Resident. This finding was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #13) out of 4 Residents reviewed for care plans.The findings include:A Care Plan is a formalized, dynamic document outlining a Resident's health conditions, goals, and specific interventions, created collaboratively by healthcare professionals, patients, and families. The care plan ensures personalized care, tracks progress, and includes medication, treatment plans, and provider information to improve health outcomes and safety, especially for chronic conditions. The key components of a care plan include assessment (identification of Resident needs, symptoms, and medical history), nursing diagnosis (identification of specific patient health problems), goals/desired outcomes (actionable, measurable, and patient-centered targets), interventions (specific, planned actions to be taken by the interdisciplinary care team), and evaluation (regular review of the plan's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene. This was evident for 2 (Resident #54 and #109) of 3 residents reviewed for ADLs during the annual survey, The findings include The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated, standardized clinical assessment tool used in Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes to evaluate a resident's functional, medical, psychological, and cognitive status.1.On 4/27/2026 at 11:17 AM Resident #54 stated that a Geriatric Nursing Assistant #23(GNA) puts double diapers on them at night and did so again last night 4/25/27. That GNA #23 worked a double shift, 3-11 and 11-7 shift that night. The resident stated that s/he was developing redness on their peri area and bottom because of the double diapering.A review of resident #54's care plan with initiation dated of 3/13/26 and 3/24/26 respectively, documented that resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of medical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to respond to recommendations made by consulting pharmacists in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Residents #88) of 5 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include:On 04/30/2026 at 8:22 AM: A review of Resident #88's medical record showed that the Medication Regimen Review (MMR) for December 3, 2025, lacked documentation of a review being conducted.The pharmacy had recommended that the Multivitamin be given 4 hours after the Levothyroxine was administered. The recommendation was Please Administer Multivitamin at least 4 hours after the Levothyroxine.A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for April 2026 revealed that Resident #88's Levothyroxine continued to be administered at 6 AM and the Multivitamin at 9 AM, which is only 3 hours apart instead of the recommended 4 hours apart.04/30/2026 at 9:58 AM: Staff #14, the Regional Clinical Nurse, was interviewed and stated they would check on whether Resident #88's December 3, 2025, MRR was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and surveyor record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician medication orders had 1) appropriate indication for usage of the medications and 2) appropriate monitoring and documenting for side effects of medications for a Resident. This finding was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #111) out of 3 Residents reviewed for physician medication orders.The findings include:The surveyor conducted an observation of medication administration on 4/29/2026 at 7:49 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #10 for Resident #111.Apixaban (Eliquis) is an anticoagulant medication, blood thinner.Furosemide (Lasix) is a diuretic medication, water pill.At 10:45 AM on 4/29/2026 the surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #111's medical record. Review of the medical record revealed that Resident had physician medication orders for Apixaban (Eliquis) 2.5 mg by mouth two times a day, and Lasix (Furosemide) 40 mg by mouth one time a day for pleural effusions. The Eliquis order did not have an indication for usage of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food was stored to maintain food safety. This was evident during the initial observation of the kitchen upon survey entry.The findings include:1) On 04/27/2026 at 7:34 AM, an initial observation of the kitchen revealed in the freezer there were french toast sticks, green beans, and chicken patties which were all opened and unlabeled.At the same time, further observation of the kitchen fridge next to the freezer revealed turkey bacon which was opened and unlabeled.On 04/27/2026 and 7:46 AM, further observation of the kitchen on a top shelf above a preparation table revealed a box of, quick creamy wheat, which was opened and unlabeled, plastic square containers with lids of what looked to be oatmeal and creamy wheat, which were opened and unlabeled, all purpose flour opened and unlabeled, and a large jug of, salsa picante, which was opened and unlabeled with the date it was opened. At the same time, further observation of the kitchen fridge with salad dressings had a plastic container with a lid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure resident medical records were accurately documented and maintained according to professional standard of practice. This was evident for 3 (Resident #3 #78 and #13) of 7 residents reviewed for advance directives and medical records accuracy. The findings include: 1.On 04/28/2026 at 7:55 AM, review of Resident #3's medical record revealed a document titled, Social Services Assessment and Documentation, dated 3/20/2025 signed by Director of Social Services #3 that indicated on line 5b. that the resident did not have an advanced directive, on line 5c. that additional conversation regarding advanced care planning was not provided, 5d. that the opportunity to complete an advanced directive was not provided, and 5e. that advanced directive educational materials were not provided to the resident. On 04/28/2026 at 8:14 AM, review of Resident #78's medical record revealed a document titled, Social Services Assessment and Documentation, dated 3/02/2026 signed by Director of Social Services #3 that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was the determined that the facility failed to report an incident involving a resident who had a serious injury of unknown source, where abuse or neglect had not been ruled out, to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) as required. This was evident for 1 (Resident #12) of 13 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include:The Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) is the agency within the Maryland Department of Health charged with monitoring the quality of care in Maryland's health care facilities and community-based programs.On 04/01/2026 at 10:46 AM, a review of Resident #12's clinical record revealed that on 03/23/2026, Resident #12 had an unwitnessed event in the facility. The resident's spouse reported the resident's legs were hanging off the side of the bed and were put back in place. Staff did not witness the event, and the resident could not explain what happened. The resident complained of left leg pain and was sent to the hospital on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a thorough and timely investigation of an incident involving a resident who had a serious injury of unknown source. This was evident for 1 (Resident #12) of 13 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: On 04/01/2026 at 10:40AM, a review of Resident #12's clinical record revealed that on 03/23/2026, Resident #12 had an unwitnessed event in the facility. The resident's spouse reported the resident's legs were hanging off the side of the bed and were put back in place. Staff did not witness the event, and the resident was not able to explain what happened. The resident complained of left leg pain and was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of Emergency Department (ED) records dated 03/24/2026 showed the resident had an acute left hip periprosthetic (around an artificial joint or implant) fracture. On 04/03/2026 at 11:13 AM, during an interview, the Administrator stated that Resident #12's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) discharge assessments were completed for a discharged resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #2) of 13 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident.On 4/1/26 at 12:12 PM a review of Resident #2's medical record was conducted and revealed Resident #2 was transferred to an acute care facility on 2/3/26. Review of MDS assessments in Resident #2's medical record failed to produce a discharge MDS assessment.On 4/1/26 at 12:15 PM an interview was conducted with the MDS Coordinator. The MDS Coordinator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure implementation of care planned interventions necessary to prevent accidents for a resident identified as high risk for falls. This was evident for 1 (Resident #12) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents during the complaint survey.The findings include:On 04/01/2026 at 10:46 AM, Resident #12's clinical record was reviewed to reveal the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, altered mental status, hydrocephalus, seizures, intracranial injury, and muscle weakness.Review of Resident #12's care plan revealed the resident had a history of multiple unwitnessed falls, including 01/09/2026, 01/15/2026, 02/12/2026, and 02/19/2026. The fall care plan, initiated on 02/19/2026, included the use of a fall mat for fall prevention.Review of Resident #12's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, facility staff interviews, the facility failed to provide medication administration that meets professional standards for 5 of 8 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident #27, Resident #23, Resident #28, Resident #29 and Resident #30). 1. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of diabetes. A review of the physician's orders dated 11/22/25 revealed Resident #27 was prescribed insulin lispro injection solution; inject as per sliding scale if 0 - 150 = 0 units; 151 - 200 = 2 units; 201 - 250 = 3 units; 251 - 300 = 4 units; 301 - 350 = 5 units; 351 - 400 = 6 units Blood sugar above 400, give 7 units. Repeat Blood Sugar in 15 minutes and call provider., subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for diabetes. A medication administration observation was conducted on 12/16/25 at 11:49 am with Staff Nurse #6. Staff Nurse #6 was observed checking Resident #27's blood glucose level. Staff Nurse #6 indicated that Resident #27's blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations and recorded reviews, the facility failed to provide a direct communication system which relays Resident(R) calls when assistance was needed to ensure appropriate response from staff members at a centralized staff working station for three Residents, R35, R36, and R37. The facility census was 78. Findings Include: Record review of the facility undated policy titled Call Lights, Accessibility and Timely Response documented, the purpose of the policy was to assure the facility equipped Residents with a call light at each Resident bedside, toilet and bathing area to allow Residents to call for assistance. Call lights will directly be relayed to staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response. Policy directed staff to ensure the call light was within reach and secured as needed. Policy further directed staff to report problems with a call light system immediately to the supervisor and or maintenance director and provide immediate or alternative solutions, such as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews of observations and recorded reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for three Residents(R). R13, R33 and R34, when facility failed to replace a damaged and leaking commode toilet in R33 and R34s bathroom for several months and failed to provide a sanitary environment in R13s room. The census was 78.Findings Include: Record review of the facility undated policy titled Safe and Comfortable Environment dated 12/11/2024 and last reviewed on 2/11/2025 documented; in accordance with Residents rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment. The facility will minimize odors by disposing of soiled linens promptly and reporting lingering odors and bathrooms needing cleaning to the Housekeeping Department. 1.Record review of R13s face sheet (a document containing Resident information and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, facility and pharmacy staff interviews, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered by the physician to meet the resident's need of 3 of 8 sampled residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident #23, Resident #29 and Resident #30). a. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of seizures adjustment disorder, hypertension, diabetes and dysarthria. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact. A review of the physician's orders dated 11/3/25 revealed Resident #23 was prescribed Biofreeze cool the pain external gel 4% (menthol topical analgesic) apply to right shoulder topically two times a day for pain. A medication administration observation was conducted on 12/16/25 at 9:22 am with Staff Nurse #5. Staff Nurse #5 was observed to not have administered the medication biofreeze cool the pain external gel 4%(menthol topical analgesic) to Resident #23 as per physician orders. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review , staff and pharmacist interviews, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% as evidenced by 5 errors out of 43 opportunities observed. The medication error rate was 11%. 1. A review of the physician's orders dated 11/3/25 revealed Resident #23 was prescribed Biofreeze cool the pain external gel 4% (menthol topical analgesic) apply to right shoulder topically two times a day for pain. A medication administration observation was conducted on 12/16/25 at 9:22 am with Staff Nurse #5. Staff Nurse #5 was observed to not have administered the medication biofreeze cool the pain external gel 4%(menthol topical analgesic) to Resident #23 as per physician orders. During interview on 12/18/25 at 10:33 am, Staff Nurse #5 stated that she thought she administered the medication to Resident #23. 2. A review of the physician's orders dated 12/11/22 revealed Resident #28 was prescribed amlodipine besylate 2.5mg 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and staff and pharmacist interviews, the facility failed to label opened insulin pens with the patient name, physician name, date used for 1 insulin pens for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage (West Wing Medication Cart). The [NAME] Wing Medication Cart was observed on 12/16/25 at 11:49 am in the presence of Staff Nurse #6. The observation revealed 1 opened and used insulin pen of Humalog (insulin lispro) that was stored with no label indicating patient name, physician name and order. The facility insulin pens policy copyright 2025, provided by the Director of nursing , indicated that Insulin pens must be clearly labeled with the resident name, physician name, date dispensed, type of insulin, amount to be given, frequency, and expiration date.During interview on 12/17/25 at 12:33pm, Staff Nurse #6 indicated that he used an unlabeled insulin lispro kwikpen , to administer insulin. Staff Nurse #6 stated that the kwikpen, had a room number, manually handwritten on the kwikpen, with a black marker. Staff Nurse #6 indicated that he did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were administered to a resident as ordered. This was evident for 6 (Resident #77, #7, #38, #48, #90 & #85) out 14 residents reviewed for medication regimen review and medication administration. The findings include: 1a) On 3/7/25 at 10:46 AM the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #14 prepare medications that were scheduled to be given at 9 AM for Resident #77. LPN #14 stated that lactulose was not available but had 2 of the medications, amlodipine Besylate and Loratadine. The surveyor next observed LPN #14 administer the medications to Resident #77 at 10:51 AM. The surveyor noted this was over an hour from the due time. 1b) On 3/7/25 at 10:56 AM the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #14 prepare medications that were scheduled to be given at 9 AM for Resident #7. LPN #14 stated that fluticasone furoate-vilanterol inhaler and furosemide were not available and had to be re-ordered. Ferrous sulfate, folic acid, extra strength tylenol,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to meet the needs of a Resident. This was found evident of 1 (Resident #85) of 19 Residents reviewed for care planning during an annual and complaint survey. The findings include: On 3/14/25 at 8:18 AM, the surveyor reviewed Physical Therapy (PT) notes for Resident #85. The review revealed a note written on 1/21/25 that stated, Resident # 85 was educated and engaged in bilateral (both) lower extremities home exercise program to improve strength. It further stated that the Therapist communicated with the unit manager about the Resident's inability to see and hear. On 3/14/25 at 12:30 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #85's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] and 1/21/25. The review revealed that on 10/15/25 Resident #85 was assessed to have adequate hearing ability and on the 1/21/25 Resident #85 was assessed to have minimal difficulty (difficulty in some environments,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, meal ticket review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the residents' food preferences were honored. This was found to be evident for 1(Resident #9) out of 38 residents reviewed for food/nutrition. The findings include: Observation of the kitchen serving lunch, on 03/12/25 at 11:40 AM, found that East unit #1 food cart arrived at 11:43 AM in the hallway. Resident #4 refused his lunch tray containing rice, he stated because he dislikes rice. Reviewing his meal ticket revealed that no rice was printed on his meal tickets. Shared above info. with the Kitchen's Manager (Staff #4) that he agreed it was an error. Interview, on 03/12/25 at 01:20 PM, the Administrator stated that he agreed to the error that kitchen staff made as a deficiency practice.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse within the required timeframe for 3 (Residents #13, #27, and #32) of 19 residents reviewed for abuse allegations. Findings included: The facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, revised on 09/12/2024, indicated, The facility strictly prohibits abuse, mistreatment, neglect, or exploitation of all residents, or the misappropriation of resident property. The facility will report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations within prescribed timeframes. 1. Resident #27's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident in October 2018. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into an allegation of neglect by failing to conduct interviews with facility staff assigned to care for the resident. This affected 1 (Resident #13) of 19 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, revised [DATE], specified, The facility will perform an investigation that focuses on whether abuse or neglect occurred and to what extent, clinical evaluation for any signs of injury, causative factors, and interventions to prevent further injury. Resident #13's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident in [DATE]. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of paraplegia, end stage renal disease, pressure ulcer, and dependence on renal dialysis. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and services were provided to promote healing of pressure ulcers for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #21) of 13 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure weekly wound assessments were consistently completed and documented as per the care plan and to promptly consult with the attending physician or wound nurse practitioner (NP) regarding deterioration of a pressure ulcer for Resident #3. Additionally, the facility failed to provide wound treatments as ordered for Resident #21. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Participation - Assessment/Care Plans, revised 10/2019, indicated, The resident and his or her representative are encouraged to participate in the resident's assessment and in the development and implementation of the resident's care plan. The policy further indicated, The resident/representative's right to participate in the development…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a physician-ordered intervention for bed rails was consistently implemented to assist the resident with safe bed mobility and minimize the risk of falls out of bed for 1 (Resident #4) of 5 residents reviewed for falls. Findings included: The facility policy titled, Fall Prevention Program, revised on 09/05/2023, indicated, Each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls. The facility policy titled, Use of Bed Rails, initiated on 03/14/2023, indicated, It is the policy of this facility to utilize a person-centered approach when determining the use of bed rails. Appropriate alternative approaches are attempted prior to installing or using bed rails. If bed rails are used, the facility ensures correct installation, use, and maintenance of the rails. The policy also indicated, Informed consent from the resident or resident representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the complete medical record was retained for a minimum of five years from the date of the residents' discharge for 2 (Resident #33 and Resident #34) of 45 residents whose medical records were reviewed. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Maintenance of Electronic Clinical Records, revised on 03/14/2023, indicated, Policy: This facility will maintain electronic records for each resident in accordance with acceptable standards of practice. The Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines specified, 5. Records will be retained in the electronic database per state law or five years from the date of discharge when there is no requirement in state law. 1. Resident #33's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 08/13/2021. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of acute hematogenous osteomyelitis of the left ankle and foot, anemia in chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-09-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to label drugs and biologicals in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 1 of 1 medication storage room selected for medication storage inspection during the survey. The findings include: On 09-16-2020 at 12:45 PM, a surveyor observed a 5 ml vial of TB (tuberculosis) skin test in the refrigerator with an open date marked 07-30-2020. It should have been discarded on 08-30-2020. Further observations revealed more than 100 syringes of 5 ml heparin flush with an expiration date of 06-13-2019 in medication storage room. The surveyor also observed multiple expired phlebotomy tubes (used to draw blood for lab testing). There were 3 cases (each case with 50 tubes) of red top tubes with an expiration date of 09-10-2020, six (6) additional red top tubes with an expiration date of 02-05-2020, one (1) green tube with an expiration date of 09-12-2019, and 15 purple tubes with expiration date of 11-11-2019. The charge nurse of the unit discarded expired tubes. On 09-16-2020 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-09-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, review of clinical records, facility policy and procedures and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure infection control practices to prevent development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for residents. This finding was evident for 3 of 25 residents reviewed during annual survey (Resident #16, #67, and #281). The findings include: 1. On 09-10-2020 at 8:30 AM, surveyor tour of Resident #67's room revealed oxygen tubing connected to an oxygen concentrator (a device which concentrates the oxygen from the surrounding air). The tubing was observed on the floor with the nostril section (nasal cannula, the tip that goes into the nose) under the resident's bed. Further observation revealed that the tubing and the humidifier bottle was dated 07-19-2020. Surveyor review of the clinical records for Resident #67 revealed a physician order to Change and date oxygen tubing every week and as needed. Rinse oxygen concentrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-09-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, interviews and observations, the facility failed to safeguard the disclosure of medical information. This was evident for 1 resident of 25 residents reviewed during the survey (Resident #63). The findings include: During observation of medication pass on 09-15-2020 at 8:50 AM, surveyor observed a poster with range of motion exercises in room [ROOM NUMBER]-A where Resident #65 resided post; however, the poster had Resident #63's name on it. On 09-15-2020 surveyor review of Resident #63's medical records revealed that the resident had started physical therapy on 07-16-2020 and that the physical therapist had instructed the Geriatric Assistant Nurses (GNAs) on therapeutic exercises for Resident #63. On 09-15-2020 at 9:56 AM, surveyor interviewed Staff #3. Staff #3 acknowledged that the poster should not have been posted and that it was in the wrong room. Staff #3 further stated that upon residents' discharge from physical therapy, the physical therapists instruct the nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-09-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to assist residents to file a grievance on a missing personal belonging. It was evident for 1 of 1 resident selected for the personal property review (Resident #74). The findings include: On 09-10-2020 at 3:17 PM, an interview with Resident #74 revealed the resident's robe was missing since 04-25-2020. Resident #74 reported the missing robe to Registered Nurse (RN) #4. However, RN #4 did not assist the resident to file a grievance for her/his missing robe. On 09-14-2020 at 1:35 PM, an interview with RN #4 confirmed Resident #74 reported the missing a robe to her. RN #4 told the surveyor she went through the resident's belongings in the resident's room and also checked with laundry department, but no one found it. However, RN#4 did not assist Resident #74 to file a grievance and did inform he pass management that Resident #74 reported missing property. On 09-14-2020 at 2:36 PM, an interview with the administrator revealed no additional information.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-09-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to meet professional standards of care. This finding was evident for 1 of 25 residents reviewed for standards of care during the survey (Resident #2). The findings include: On 09-15-2020 at 1:41 PM, Resident #2's record review revealed she/he was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] from a hospital. Upon readmission, the resident's attending physician discontinued orders for Depakote (Depakote is an anticonvulsant used to treat seizure disorders, certain psychiatric conditions such as manic phase of bipolar disorder and to prevent migraine headaches). Further review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed the resident had a visit with a psychiatrist on 09-10-2020, the psychiatrist listed Depakote 500 mg twice a day for mood stability as current medication. However, the resident ' s record review revealed she/he was not on Depakote since 06-08-2020 and there was no evidence the facility staff communicated this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-09-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow physician order to provide resident care. This finding was evident for 1 of 25 residents reviewed for quality of care during the survey (Resident #278). The findings include: On 09-16-2020 at 10:10 AM a review of Resident #278's record revealed the resident had a physician's order, dated on 08-22-2020, to administer Humulin 70/30 (It is a mixture of 70% intermediate-acting insulin (isophane) and 30% short-acting insulin (regular). It starts to work as quickly as regular insulin but lasts longer) 45 units subcutaneously (A subcutaneous injection is a method of administering medication under the skin) twice a day (7:30 AM and 4:30 PM) for diabetes. The medication was ordered to be given 30 minutes before meals. Further record review revealed the resident did not receive Humulin 70/30 on 08-23-2020 at 4:30 PM and on 08-24-2020 at 7:30 AM. Record review revealed there was no documented evidence as to why Resident #278 did not receive Humulin 70/30 as ordered by the physician.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-09-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, review of the clinical records and facility staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion. This finding was evident for 1 of 5 residents selected for review of range of motion during the survey (Resident #5). The findings include: On 09-14-2020 at 9:15 AM, surveyor review of Resident #5's clinical record revealed that the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #5 nursing assessment upon admission revealed resident has contractures and a loss of range of motion and physical limitations of the left upper extremities. Further record review revealed physical therapy assessment and recommendations dated 10-02-2019 for a left palm protector and elbow splints to be worn 6-8 hours every shift to prevent further contractures and further decline. However, surveyor observations on 09-10-2020 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-09-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor review of the clinical record, surveyor observation and interview with a resident and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a current physician's order was in place for the use and assessment for oxygen use by residents. This finding was evident for 2 of 3 residents selected for the Respiratory Care review. (#37,#55) The findings include: On 09-08-19 at 11 AM, surveyor observation revealed that resident #55 had an oxygen concentrator (portable oxygen) in his/her room with a nasal cannula connected and an oxygen setting at 2 liters/ minute. Further observation of the resident's room on 09-09-19 at 11:28 AM revealed thst the oxygen concentrator was in place with a setting of 2 liters/minute, and the nasal cannula, which was dated for 09-08-19 was found at the resident's bedside. In addition, a portable nebulizer machine ( turns liquid medicine into a mist to help treat asthma) was sitting on the resident's bedside stand with an attached face mask, that was dated for 09-08-19. On 09-09-19 surveyor review of the clinical record for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-09-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a complete baseline care plan. This finding was evident for 1 of 25 residents selected for review during the survey. (#9) The findings include: On 09-10-19 at 01:30 PM, surveyor review of resident #9's clinical record revealed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a physician's order to take Simvastatin. Simvastatin is a medication that is used to lower cholesterol. There was no evidence in the clinical record that a care plan was developed regarding the use and monitoring of Simvastatin or associated medical conditions. On 09-11-19 at 1 PM, interview with the Director of Nursing revealed no new information.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on surveyor review of the clinical record and facility staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive resident centered care plan to meet residents' medical condition. This finding was evident in 1 of 25 residents selected for review during the survey. (#61) The findings include: On 09-12-19 at 9:15 AM, surveyor review of resident #61's clinical record revealed that the resident had been receiving Trazodone, a psychotropic (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions or behavior) medication since July 2019. However, review of the care plan for resident #61 revealed that there was no care plan developed specific to the use of the Trazodone. On 09-12-19 at 10:10 AM, surveyor interview with the director of nursing (DON) revealed no additional information.
- Potential for harm · D2019-09-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor review of the clinical record, interview with facility staff and with residents' court appointed guardian, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that interdisciplinary care plan conferences were conducted timely after each resident's MDS assessment. This finding was evident for 3 of 25 residents selected during the survey. (#55, #20,#21) The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive and accurate assessment of each resident's functional capacity and health status to assist nursing home staff in identifying health problems. MDS assessments are required for residents on admission to the nursing facility and then periodically, within specific guidelines and time frames. 1. On 08-11-19, surveyor review of the clinical record for resident #55 revealed that a quarterly MDS was completed with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 05-13-19. However, there was no documented evidence in the clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor review of the clinical record, surveyor observation of medication pass and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure nursing standards of practice for residents. This finding was evident for 2 of 25 residents selected for review during the survey. (#23 and #68) The findings include: 1. On 09-10-19 at 5:34PM, surveyor observation of medication administration for resident #23 revealed LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) # 1 administered 9 medications to the resident. However, review of the clinical record and the September 2019 MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed that 7 of the 9 medications administered were scheduled for administration at 4:30PM and 5PM daily. The other 2 administered medications were not scheduled until 9PM. Further observation at 5:45PM on 09-10-19 revealed that LPN # 1 signed for the administration of the 4:30PM and 5PM medications after administration. However, there was no evidence that the medications that were scheduled for 9 PM were signed by LPN # 1 after administration. On 09-10-19 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor review of the clinical record and facility staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders. This finding was evident in 1 of 5 residents selected for unnecessary medication review during the survey. (#72) The findings include: On 09-10-19 at 08:30 AM, surveyor review of the clinical record for resident #72 revealed a physician order, written on 08-15-19, that read check blood sugar before meals and at bedtime for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Please notify provider for blood sugar less than 70 and greater than 250. Additional record review of medication administration record (MAR) for the month of August and September revealed facility nursing staff documentation of blood sugar results on the following days: 08-17-19 before breakfast 47 09-03-19 before lunch 294 09-03-19 before dinner 375 09-04-19 before lunch 324 09-04-19 before dinner 320 09-05-19 before lunch 321 09-06-19 before lunch 342 09-06-19 before dinner 351 09-07-19 before breakfast 61 There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2019-09-12 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor review of the clinical record, review of the Beneficiary Protection Notifications and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide resident #23's responsible party with the NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) and SNFABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage) in a timely manner. This finding was evident for 1 (#23) of 3 residents selected for the Beneficiary Protection Notification review. The findings include: On 09-11-19, surveyor review of the clinical record for resident #23 revealed that 06-07-19 was the last effective date of Medicare coverage for skilled services. However, review of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) revealed documentation by the facility staff that resident #23's responsible party was not notified until 06-06-19 via a voice mail message, which was not within the requirement of a 48 hour time frame for notification. Further review of the NOMNC revealed there was no evidence of a signature by either the facility representative nor resident #23's responsible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2019-09-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately document a resident's responsible party on the face sheet. This finding was evident for 1 of 25 residents selected for review during the survey. (#28) The findings include: On 09-09-19, surveyor review of resident #28's clinical record revealed that they was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was self-responsible. On 07-09-19, resident #28's family member was granted financial power of attorney for the resident. On 07-10-19, resident #28 was certified by 2 physicians as being incapable of understanding or making decisions due to a medical condition. On 09-09-19, surveyor review of resident #28's facesheet revealed that the resident was still listed as self-responsible. On 09-10-19 at 01:00 PM, interview with resident#28 revealed that the family member who was appointed their financial power of attorney also makes medical decisions for the resident. On 09-10-19 at 01:45 PM, interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMPLETE CARE — 85 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 84 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 84; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC MD5 OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/01/2023 |
| PC MD5 TOPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2023 |
| SMS 2021 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2023 |
| DES CAPITAL LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| JRK INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| KLUGMAN, JACOB | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| STEIN, SHALOM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| STERNBUCH, DANIEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| COX, VICKIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| DAVE, MITUL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| ELUDOYIN, OLUDAPO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| MANSFIELD, MELISSA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| SILVERBERG, NISANEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| SCHONFELD, AKIVA | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2021 |
| ADESSE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| ADESSE MD PEACE MD5 PROPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| ADESSE MD5 PROPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| HC FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| MD 4 PROPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| PEACE CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| SILVER SPRING TWO MD PROPCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| SALAMI, MOJIRAYO | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $536K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215052. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.