Good Samaritan Society - Bethany

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 218 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 131 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 69.5 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.53 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.69 to 1.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for dignity related to dressing. Findings Include: R2's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 was admitted on [DATE], was able to communicate clearly and understand others, moderate to mild cognitive impairment category, and had the following diagnoses: anxiety, mood disturbance, and dementia. R2's care plan last revised 8/29/25, indicated R2 required an assist of one for dressing related to activity intolerance, Dementia, and impaired balance. The care plan also indicated R2 had enhanced psychosocial well-being related to individualized daily routine and honoring personal preference. During observation on 10/1/25 at 9:40 a.m., the following events occurred:- 9:40 a.m., R2 was observed lying in bed in the highest position, wearing only a brief with his door wide open. - 9:55 a.m. nursing assistant (NA)-A was walking down R2's hall and walked right past R2's room which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review failed to provide repositioning and toileting/incontinence cares for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) and who were dependent on staff for ADL's.Findings Include: R2's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 was admitted on [DATE], was able to communicate clearly and understand others, was moderate to mild cognitive impairment category, and had the following diagnoses: anxiety, mood disturbance, and dementia. R2's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 9/23/25 had a score of 14 indicating R2 is a moderate risk for skin breakdown. The intervention guide included frequent turning with a planned schedule and managing moisture. R2's care plan last revised 8/29/25, indicated R2 has bowel and blader incontinence related to Alzheimer's Disease. The care plan indicated R2 will remain free from skin breakdown due to incontinence and brief use. RS was to be checked for incontinence every two hours. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure acute, potentially distressing psychoactive symptoms were recorded and non-pharmacological interventions were attempted or recorded to ensure efficacy of as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medication for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R3) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R1's significant change Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses which included depression, anxiety, and R1 was cognitively intact. Identified R1 did not exhibit any behaviors. R1's care plan revised on 2/12/25, indicated R1 had a potential mood problem related to depression and anxiety disorder and directed staff to provide encouragement/assistance/support to maintain as much independent and control as possible, for relaxation: keep on classical music, essential oils (lavender), keeping clean (hand washing), lotion, and foot massage. Further, R1's care plan revised 2/11/25, indicated R1 had a behavioral symptom related to anxiety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to initiate appropriate transmission based precautions according to The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for 2 of 3 residents (R11, R224) reviewed for transmission based precautions, failed to track and trend potential/actual infections for 6 of 6 residents (R11, R35, R36, R24, R1, R224) identified to have potential/actual infections; and failed to conduct COVID-19 testing per CDC guidelines for 5 of 5 residents (R11, R35, R36, R24, R15) who were identified to have COVID-19 signs and symptoms. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Transmission-Based Precautions: R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R11 was [AGE] years old, cognitively intact and diagnoses included acute prostatitis (a disorder of the prostate gland associated with inflammation), urinary tract infection (UTI), COVID-19, and Type 2 diabetes. R11's care plan revised 7/24/24, identified R11 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter bag was placed in a privacy bag to maintain dignity for 1 of 3 residents (R25) reviewed for dignity. Findings include: R25's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R25's cognition was severely impaired and diagnoses included Huntington's disease (a rare genetic disorder that affects the brain and causes movement, cognitive and mental health problems). R25 used an indwelling urinary catheter due to having a neurogenic bladder (when the relationship between the nervous system and bladder function was disrupted by injury or disease). R25's care plan revised 2/12/24, identified R25 had an indwelling catheter due to urinary outlet obstruction and neurogenic bladder. The care plan directed catheter care was performed by nursing assistants twice daily with cares and as needed. A non-adhesive secure anchor on leg. However, the care plan failed to direct staff to keep the catheter bag in a privacy bag…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed ensure clinical monitoring was completed and documented for 2 of 3 residents (R37, R39) reviewed with recent COVID-19 infections. Findings include: R37's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R37 was [AGE] years old, had a severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease. R37's care plan revised 9/26/24, identified R37 had a respiratory infection: COVID-19 and directed staff to observe for symptoms and monitor/document/report new or worsening signs/symptoms of COVID-19. R37's Order Summary Report dated 10/1/24 - 10/13/24, directed staff to obtain clinical monitoring - infection/suspected infection two times a day for 12 days. R37's progress from 9/26/24 through 10/4/24, identified R37 was positive for COVID-19 on 9/26/24 and R37's urine was collected for a urinary analysis and culture on 9/30/24. However, the progress notes failed to identify any…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate provider's order and rational for use were obtained for an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 3 residents (R30) who were reviewed for catheter care. Findings include: R30's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified no cognitive impairment and identified R30 was always continent of bladder. R30's urinary/catheter assessment dated [DATE], identified resident was admitted to the unit with indwelling urinary catheter in place. The rational provided was the resident was on hospice. R30's provider's orders dated 9/30/24, identified an order for Foley Cath (catheter) Care dated 9/30/24. The provider's orders lacked any order for insertion or use of a Foley Cath, or the rational for the use of it. During observation on 10/16/24 at 12:25 p.m., R30 sat up in her bed and ate lunch. R30's Foley catheter bag was hanging on the side of her bed. During interview on 10/16/24 at 1:24 p.m., R30 stated she did not know…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care according to standards of practice and per physician orders for gastrostomy tube feeding for 1 of 1 resident (R15) reviewed for tube feedings. Finding include: R15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses of traumatic brain dysfunction, hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis or weakness), and seizure disorder. R15 was dependent on staff for bed mobility and had a gastrostomy tube (g-tube) for feeding. R15's Order summary report signed by the primary Physician on 8/28/24, identified an order for enteral feeding two times a day with Nutren 1.5 at 75 milliliters per hour (ml/hr., to run for 16 hours per 24-hour period. Elevate head of bed (HOB) greater than 30 degrees with tube feeding running, Start at 1700 (5:00 p.m.), end at 0900, for a total of 1200ml/day. Reset count to zero with new bag. R15's care plan dated 5/15/17, identified R15 required a tube…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a discontinued presciption topical antifungal medication was detroyed and not administered; and failed to ensure only authorizied staff administered prescribed adminstered prescribed creams for 1 of 1 resident (R15) observed to have nursing assistants apply prescribtion creams during cares without an order. Finding include: R15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R15 had severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses of traumatic brain dysfunction, non-Alzheimer's dementia, hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis or weakness), and seizure disorder. R15 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) such as personal hygiene, oral hygiene, bed mobility, and dressing. R15's Order summary report signed by the primary Physician on [DATE], identified Nystatin External Cream 1000 unit/gram (nystatin topical) and appply to under breast topically two times a day for rash related to rash and other nonspecific…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0660 — isolated
  Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to create an individualized discharge care plan, to develop interventions to meet the resident's discharge goals and needs to ensure a smooth and safe transition from the facility to the post-discharge setting, for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed. Findings include: R3's quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3 had diagnoses of heart failure, respiratory failure, and was cognitively intact. Further, assessment indicated there was an active discharge plan in place for R3 to return to the community and a referral had been made to the Local Contact Agency. R3's care plan dated 3/28/24, lacked evidence of a comprehensive discharge plan to address the goals for care, treatment preferences, identify needs that must be addressed before discharge, interest in and any referrals made to the local contact agency, as well as identifying post-discharge needs such as nursing, therapy services, medical equipment or modifications to the home, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 55 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN